Cedar wrote:
Any suggestions as to another firewall to try with AVG?
...and what is this compussion people have to blockquote IN ENTIRETY
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Cedar wrote:
Any suggestions as to another firewall to try with AVG?
Micros~1's firewall is crap.
It doesn't filter OUTBOUND traffic
--ignoring the main reason to have a SOFTWARE firewall.
Get the **OLDEST** versaion of the ZA firewall.
http://www.oldapps.com/zonealarm.php
...and what is this
[1:05 pm re-post of a 12:25 pm post]
Barclay, Daniel wrote:
[Excuse this if it's a duplicate. Local evidence suggests that the
first attempt to sending this didn't make it to the list.]
Bookmark this page.
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey
Google Groups archives everything
scott wrote:
[...]I see some eml thing and the wmv in the attachments [pane??]
... but it is useless... his stuff is unforwardable
Both of those are M$'s proprietary crap.
Their whole purpose for existing IS TO BE INCOMPATIBLE.
Previous discussion on this:
ST wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble viewing breitbart pages.
That site is a steaming pile.
It doesn't even pass the pre-test:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://breitbart.com
...unable to validate this document
because on line 119 it contained
one or more bytes that I cannot interpret
Ray_Net wrote:
The problem is created by optimist guys
putting the Gold status too early
The KDE team had a similar problem with KDE 4.0.
To get anyone to write apps for the updated codebase,
they had to remove the Beta status.
They, however, noted that 4.0 was a
*This will eat your children*
Devil's Advocate wrote:
[...]I'd like to have a way of clicking on a site and blacklisting it
[...]
Getting a big muscle bound company like Google to implement it
may take forever[...]
...or perhaps they've had it for ages and you weren't aware of it.
Campy wrote:
[...]I am talking sites such as Yahoo, Google, EBay, etc.
[...]My wife's computer (XP, SeaMonkey 1.17) and mine
are connected through a router to coble internet
and she does not have this problem.
Make your DNS settings the same as hers?
Ant wrote:
Is there a way to change/disable these keys?
Edit the source code and recompile it.
(Isn't Open Source Software great?)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Christian Mondrup wrote:
[...]
(http://www.jyskordbog.dk/hjemmesider/jyskiso.exe).
This file is in fact a zip file containing 3 truetype fonts.
I've stored these fonts in the
~/.fonts and /user/share/fonts/truetype directories
of my Ubuntu 9.10 workstation
When I point the Konqueror browser to
Devils_Advocate wrote:
I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey,
then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again.
I note that you didn't give an example URL.
There are a lot of bozos who are putting up Web pages
but who have NO IDEA what they are doing.
Phillip Jones wrote:
[...]sites[...]that use[ActiveX].
Yup.
Site owners who insist on using junk that only *some* folks have
is another case of stupidity that surfers have to deal with.
Webmaster who don't know how to sniff for browsers properly
has also been mentioned.
Folks who go to stupid
Phillip Jones wrote:
(I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings
using the HTML Validator extension)
I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is
Mozilla's Home Page and my website.
There are plenty of non-bozos out there:
Rick Merrill schrieb:
Is there a fix to the registry
to make .HTM or .HTML files edit with Composer?
Martin Freitag wrote:
Why registry already?
Have you tried editing FolderOptions = FileTypes already?
There you can edit the Open and Edit commands etc.
Under Windoze,
where is it that you think
JD wrote:
You can report their error to them or change a setting in SM.
William Greenwood wrote:
Change what setting in SM?
The most commonly asked question in this group:
leigh wrote:
My post yesterday was very clumsy.
Netiquette 101:
When posting additional details about your issue
post to the SAME thread you started initially.
DONT start a *new* thread.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
leigh wrote:
[...]facebook[...]
Topic rerouted by OP to:
news:mfodnswld_gno-3wnz2dnuvz_vydn...@mozilla.org
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
James Greenidge wrote:
[...]Any cosmetic issues I might have
pales to my concern that Tiger support continues[...]
For those who are saying Huh?:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/02/08/151240threshold=5
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/02/08/151240threshold=5#31060688
Norm Cohler wrote:
I just tried twice on 2 different PCs, both running Windows 98SE,
to install SeaMonkey 2.0.2
This runs on Win98-era machines and will run modern software:
http://tinyurl.com/ReplacementForWin98
http://lightlinux.blogspot.com/2009/01/antix-8-test-release-reviewed.html#main
James Greenidge wrote:
Some sites require IE or Firefox 2.0+ to log on or do forms.
Well, require is the wrong word
--loaded with the developer's ignorant prejudice.
David E. Ross wrote:
For an explanation of what is happening, see Sniffing at my
Arne wrote:
Bing Map[...]
There is worse examples of sites that do browser sniffing.
There is *no* need to sniff for *standards-compliant* browsers;
JUST CREATE STANDARDS-COMPLIANT PAGES.
(Of couse, this would break M$'s foul business model.)
The ONLY need to sniff is for NON-compliant browsers.
Arne wrote:
Bing Map[...]
There is worse examples of sites that do browser sniffing.
JeffM wrote:
There is *no* need to sniff for *standards-compliant* browsers;
JUST CREATE STANDARDS-COMPLIANT PAGES.
Arne wrote:
Agree, was my post in any way defending any browser sniffing?
You're too easy
BJ wrote:
[...]IE will display the page,
but if the code is not written in IE standards[]
...and you have to specify **which** IE standards.
Each *version* of IE renders the same code differently.
IE is a complete botch.
Even the latest IE only gets 20 percent on Acid3
while other browsers
Phillip Jones wrote:
Page designers that design pages for w3c [compliance]
should add a notation.
/This website was written to World Wide Web Consortium Standards
and should show properly on the vast Major of Web browsers
There's even a tag for that.
Put this in an HTML file and view that with
JeffM wrote:
IE is a complete botch.
BJ wrote:
that doesn't stop a lot of noobs from using it
8-(
If people were charged for each infection they spread,
the n00bs would fall out of love with IE really fast.
The popularity of M$ would look like it fell off a cliff.
I think the EU has the best
Philip Chee wrote:
Lots of people in the SEO forums complain that
it takes up to several months before Bing notices
a new high traffic website they put up
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck
is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners.
--Ernst Jan Plugge
whereas Google
Ray_Net wrote:
Is OpenOffice able to save a word page into an html file(s) ?
OOo isn't even able to save an HTML page as HTML.
Try this:
Take a page that passes the W3C Validator,
open it with OOo, and do a Save on it.
Now run *that* thru the Validator.
DO NOT USE A WORD PROCESSOR TO MAKE HTML
JeffM wrote:
If you are going to put something on a Port 80 location,
make it **REAL** HTML.
Rick Merrill wrote:
Real?
Have you ever tried to get google/yahoo/cnn html code to validate?!
I have said here MANY times that
there is a great number of people trying to pass themselves off
as qualified
Tom Pamin wrote:
I'm having a lot of problems using 1.1.18 to print web pages.
I'm only getting parts of pages,
and it sometimes leaves off whole pages.
Running Lightning?
Bill Davidsen wrote:
http://twitter.com/WilliamGail/statuses/9896362150
What a crap link.
A page with 4 instances of unnecessary JavaScript
and not even the actual link to the page
but a shortened link.
Here's the actual link:
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/development/50-awesome-css3-animations/
JeffM wrote:
What a crap link[...]not even the actual link to the page
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Would you have neglected to credit
the person who brought it to your attention?
Wouldn't have bothered me a bit.
There's gratitude and then there's nonsense.
If someone else had linked you to that guy
James Greenidge wrote:
I've come across several batch odt to doc converter macros
This is NOT a word processor group.
If you want to continue to discuss that topic,
find a group about that topic.
http://www.openoffice.org/
___
support-seamonkey mailing
John Klein wrote:
I need a way to create several HTML email messages
for transmission by 3rd party email list owners.
First, tell them that is the stupid way to do things.
Email is a plain text medium.
HTML is for Web pages.
1) Create the HTML page.
2) Upload the page to a server.
3) Email only
Paul wrote:
I NEVER use html in email though and consider it a security risk.
So far we've covered incompatibility / rendering problems
and embedded exploits.
MCBastos wrote:
Bold or italics to make meaning clear,
As Ross mentions in his page,
too often people think tricks are a substitue for clearly-written
prose.
links with the URL and display text separate for clarity.
People who still click links in email deserve what they get.
(Phished.)
Bill
JeffM wrote:
People who still click links in email deserve what they get.
(Phished.)
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Not so fast. Not all links are bad,
and there are good practices that help you avoid that.
...like not clicking on the links.
If you are going to follow a link in email,
cut it and paste
First, the name nuke_anything_enhanced-1.0.2-fx+sm.xpi
is a lie--at least, in part.
I get an Install script not found error with SM1.
I unzipped it
and edited **install.rdf** so that minVersion is 1.1.
(The addons.mozilla.org/.../firefox page
says it works with Firefox 2.0 (Gecko 1.8) or later;
Mark Hansen wrote:
JeffM wrote:
First, the name nuke_anything_enhanced-1.0.2-fx+sm.xpi
is a lie--at least, in part.
I get an Install script not found error with SM1.
I unzipped it
and edited **install.rdf** so that minVersion is 1.1.
(The addons.mozilla.org/.../firefox page
says it works
question wrote:
Anyone figure how to Stop Optmd.com's Pop unders?
Tried your HOSTS file yet?
http://google.com/search?q=%22+HOSTS-file
Bernard Mercier wrote:
I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security.
You use *Puppy* and you're worried about *security*??
Phillip Jones wrote:
doesn't 2.03 use gecko 1.1.8
and 2.0.4 use 1.1.9 (the same as in the latest FireFox.
Close, but no cigar.
You've either got too few or too many dots and ones in there.
SeaMonkey 1.x -- Gecko 1.8
SeaMonkey 2.0.3 -- Gecko 1.9 (aka 1.9.1.8)
SeaMonkey 2.0.4 -- Gecko 1.9 (aka
Philip Chee wrote:
Kaze is currently busy backporting KompoZer
to comm-central/seamonkey trunk.
KompoZer uses FireFTP for normal FTP uploads
and a compiled binary for SFTP uploads.
Perhaps we'll see what happens
when Kaze completes his backport.
A good guy to have working with the team.
Paul wrote:
I also don't see why every one is so worried about viruses, zombies, etc.
When you use an OS that has you always running as root
(e.g. the standard version of Puppy),
drive-by infections and the ability of any user to bork the OS
are constant worries.
The logical solution is to get
Yalmez Yazaw wrote:
How do I export my emails into a format that I can use in outlook?
Start by jabbing an icepick into your eye.
(This will be least-painful part of the process.)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
flyguy wrote:
What would I see if there is a web bug?
In the broadest sense, any included URL is a Web bug.
It only *needs* to refer to a (transparent) 1-pixel graphic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_bug#E-mail_web_bugs
The more convoluted the included URL (uniqueness),
the more likely it is to
Ken wrote:
Will SM's browser NEVER be fully compatible with the Microsoft
browser for which such pages are evidently designed?
Never. The race to the bottom is not a goal.[1]
A better question would be:
When will books on Web design
start mentioning validation to standards
(specifically the W3C
L. Mark Hall wrote:
[...]
I am not able to access the site, boston.redsox.mlb.com
[...]
Major Leagu Baseball has hired incompetent people
to build and maintain their site.
Those employees/contractors have chosen to build the site
using non-standard techniques so that the site will only work
Dick Hoffman wrote:
When trying to view the video at the site
http://www.nbc.com/who-do-you-think-you-are/video/susan-sarandon/1222188/
the site loads so far and then stops with either Done
or Read www.nbc.com at the bottom left of the screen.
That page is a steaming pile of bad.
Russ Hunt wrote:
unless SeaMonkey can be configured so as to avoid this
without this pretty obscure individual fix,
David E. Ross wrote:
The problem is not in SeaMonkey.
Yup.
sniffing
Yup.
The proper way to address this problem requires three actions:
2. Contact the owner of Web sites that
David E. Ross wrote:
I'm definitely NOT a fan of using Google-groups to post to newsgroups.
Anyone who is using SeaMonkey 2.x
already has a mail-news capability to subscribe to this newsgroup.
...but do those folks still have an NNTP provider?
Many ISPs gladly dropped Usenet feeds
when e.g. this
Ray Chandler wrote:
Sorry about the lack of info. I'm running SM 2.0.4 and the OS is Linux,
Ubuntu 10.4
I
did look in the SM helper apps but didn't see an entry for .doc or .odt
files. But then there's no mention of pdf, ps or spreadsheet files
either, but they all download OK with the
Ray Chandler wrote:
Sorry about the lack of info...
When you REPLY to an *existing* thread, hit **Reply**.
DO NOT start a new thread with each new post.
Phillip Jones wrote:
What they ought to do is [write] SM/FF with Self-healing built in.
That way if a monkey wrote the website FF could read it.
...because, apparently it isn't impressive enough
to build a browser that can render proper HTML.
To impress some folks, you have to imagine -EVERY-
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I'm no advocate for Micro$oft,
False--at least by proxy, you are.
but I recognize when they do something well,
Clueless.
Internet Exploder was designed to BREAK the 'Net.
and coping well with coding errors
counts as doing something well in my book.
Your book is
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I would praise any browser that coped well with coding errors.
...except that's not what's happening with Internet Exploder.
If you shoot at a blank wall
then draw concentric circles around your best grouping,
it doesn't make you a sharpshooter.
JeffM wrote:
Clueless
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I'm no advocate for Micro$oft,
but I recognize when they do something well,
A related item in the news:
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/07/02/1157241mode=nestedthreshold=5lowbandwidth=1#32772754
___
support-seamonkey
Samuel S wrote:
[...]it is restricted to about 1/10 of the page size when opened
and cannot be increased to view the full page.[...]
Bo
A trick I use on these webmaster-knows-better-than-you-do idiocies
is to go to my history (Ctrl-H) and right-click the item.
Copy link location.
Open a blank
Thorsten Dorr wrote:
I always get this pop-up message
when I try to connect to my IMAP account:
---
| Sicherheitsfehler: Domainnamen stimmen nicht �... |
Sie haben versucht, eine Verbindung mit imap..de aufzubauen.
Allerdings
. It is possible, but unlikely that
someone tries to your communication with this site be obtained.
How can I deactivate this message?
Ray_Net wrote:
Nobody can help this guy ?
Is it or is it not a SM problem ?
JeffM wrote:
There was a great deal of chatter last Summer at Slashdot
about
Gus Richter wrote:
Another post talks about the throbber. What is a throbber?
stan wrote:
http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=throbber
An even more tightly-focused search for technical terms:
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:throbber
What is the advantage of having it?
None if you
Jens Hatlak wrote:
[...]http://acid3.acidtests.org [...]
Peter Potamus wrote:
I tried that site with SM 1.1.14, FF 3.0.5, Chrome Safari 3.2.1,
Opera 9.63, and Chrome 1.0.154.48, and a few others,
and not one passed.
...because those browsers are **not** W3C-compliant.
In fact, they aren't even
J.O. Aho wrote:
All of the key combinations you use in the Linux (and *nixes using X11)
has some differences to the default key combinations, for example Mark
All Read and it seems there will be even more coming by looking at the
improvements for SM2.
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Actually one of the
NoOp wrote:
Most WinXP apps run just fine in Win2K - but I never
could get Silverlight to run (think the threads regarding Olympics...)
on Win2K.
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
I know that this isn't what you want to hear but, . . .
anything that runs on xp
should have no problems running
Arne wrote:
That site is a disaster! The page the given url goes to:
Has Total HTTP Requests: 301
Total Size is: 1012882 bytes
and has 1040(!) Errors, 24 warning(s)
All that and the fact it is aspx makes it a nightmare and probably cause
the described effect when scrolling. It's wonder it works
flyguy wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rickles wrote:
I am using SM 1.1.14 on WinXP Pro, SP3. Media Player install is v10,
and system is up to date with security patches. This has been an
anoyance for some time, and I'm out of ideas.
From time to time I receive a WMV attachment in
HeavyDuty wrote:
Seamonkey 1.1.14, WinXP Pro SP3
I received an e-mail from a professional organization that
provided a link to a website.
http://newsletter.swd.ca/link.php?M=98038N=220L=119F=H
When I clicked the link, a full screen video captured my computer.
No way to stop it (without shutting
JeffM wrote:
Have either of you considered trying a different media player
--one that is superior to M$'s PoS?
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/features.html
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
flyguy wrote:
No, we haven't. Does it work with SM 1.1.14 and SM 2?
http://google.com/search?q=cache:q8n
Palikari ATL wrote:
[...]since upgrading from 1.1.13[,] images are not
displaying correctly or at all on certain web sites.
robert.gault@ att.net wrote:
You need to post one or more urls that cause a problem.
Palikari ATL wrote:
http://maps.google.com
http://picasaweb.google.com
[...]On Google
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I saw these today:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/09/02/26/Safari_4_rivals_Google_Chrome_in_JavaScript_race_1.html?source=NLC-DAILYcgd=2009-02-26
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9128512
and I do think that there are people
Nobody wrote:
As of 3.30 pm PST Fri 27 Feb, the basic site dukeandthedoctor.com
won't even load for me SM 1.1.14 WinXP Home SP3,
let alone give me access to the streaming audio.
Mebbe the whole site's down?
Nobody wrote:
Out of curiosity, tried again ~8.10 p.m. PST and the site loaded
terje wrote:
[...]
3) But I found out one way it works:
If I [specifically start] the [Seamonkey] Email client
and use FileOpen_File and select file.eml,
then the image is displayed correct in the message.
The task still is to save it as a file.html
so that it can be loaded in a web browser or
Joseph Puentes wrote:
Hi,
I just bought a new computer[...]
If you have a doubt about whether your post went thru,
there is a second check you can make via your browser:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/topics
This is an archive of the group
and (most days) posts appear
Ant wrote:
http://www.officedepot.com/catalog/txtSearchDD.do?jopa=s5SHQCC0IOOaUna7xLgXh3Unorefinement=truesearchTxt=Logitech+Z-2300#
Yet another steaming pile of broken code:
John Boyle wrote:
To All: There could also be a problem with Office Depot's site itself,
There isn't any could about it.
This has already been addressed in this thread:
278ccb23-f841-4937-9d5a-dc0531dbd...@v39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
as they are experiencing financially caused shrinking
John Boyle wrote:
To All: There could also be a problem with Office Depot's site itself,
JeffM wrote:
There isn't any could about it.
This has already been addressed in this thread:
278ccb23-f841-4937-9d5a-dc0531dbd...@v39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
as they are experiencing financially caused
google00@ kwcpa.com wrote:
SM converts from HTML to Plain Text BADLY. Take my word for it.
Biggest problem is that paragraph breaks are reduced,
eliminating blank line between paragraphs.
Text also sometimes wraps improperly
(Newlines appear in the middle of lines).
So i compose in HTML by
mail2news wrote:
I see that we talk about SM 2.0 (noux in 2.0 Alpha 3)
but I hope that you continue to update SM 1.1.x
SM 2.x is not compatible with old Windows versions (Windows 9x, Me, NT)
ou with old computer but there are many and many offices
and professionnal computers that use it...
You
HeavyDuty wrote:
I have created an HTML file using composer.
Does anyone know to drop an *.HTML file into Craigslist?
Upload it to the space you ISP gives you
or get a Blogger.com account.
Within your ad, link to it that.
(I wish more people would use a similar technique
rather than sending HTML
W. Watson wrote:
I've found that my SM mailer will not accept anything over 10M[...]
However, I've recently gotten 18M wmv files from others.
I guess it's all about one's ISP?
Martin Feitag wrote:
yes this ist an ISP limit. Nevertheless, keep in mind that
FTP was invented for large
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
When you click on File, Print, the window that pops up
is coming from the Operating System, not SM or FF.
Bill Davidsen wrote:
More likely the window manager. Unlike Windows,
Linux readily allows a choice of WM to suit your preferences.
Yes, I have heard
stan wrote:
When I go to this site:
http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/269-R-Carver-Rd_Plymouth_MA_02360_1106838463
The window looks like this:
http://www.fototime.com/96EAA4802CC856E/standard.jpg
Notice how the realtor info covers up details about the house.
[...]Is it the
HeavyDuty wrote:
Are there ftp sites one can upload to?
How does one go about sending a file to an FTP site?
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
Here's just one of many:
http://www.sendspace.com/
Can you show evidence that DOWNLOADS FROM that site are via FTP?
All I find is that UPLOADS TO the site can be
David E. Ross wrote:
I also looked at the quality of the HTML in HTML-formatted messages.
The mean number of errors reported by http://validator.w3.org/
was 9.1 errors per KB of file size.
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
but for the average person sending an email, this means nothing.
JeffM wrote:
3) AFTER he had a standards-compliant page,
if he wanted it to look right in IE,
he would have **added** the needed tweaks
for those using the LEAST-compliant browser.
Daniel wrote:
Sorry, Jeff, are you suggesting that
MSIE cannot display a standards-compliant page??
Apparently
Lester Caine wrote:
[...]It's only the one machine that is NOT seeing these sites.
Just discovered that it does not like microsoft.com
either so I can't run windows update :(
Raise your right hand and repeat this:
I know that these sites use the LEAST-SECURE mechanism on the planet
yet I am
Lester Caine wrote:
[...]when I select www.pctools.com it seems to be saying
the domain does not exist,
jet the same search and link works fine on the machine next door.
[...]trying to update the pctools anti virus fails, and
following the link in seamonkey also fails.
A quick peek at that site
Lester Caine wrote:
Not having any pigging windows disks for the machine,
I ended up hitting it with 'HP Recovery',
and to my surprise it worked reasonably well.
Only taken 2 days to put back all the windows updates
and restore the programs it missed
- so now can I charge the customer for two
jon q public wrote:
http://www.cwtv.com/cw-video/supernatural/full/?play=448-5399
not that it matters SM 1.1.15 under linux etc
We're sorry, but only the following operating systems are supported at
this time:
Microsoft Windows XP/Vista
(i386) Apple Macintosh OS X or later
(PPC) Apple Macintosh
saint satin stain wrote:
I formerly used Firefox and Thunder in Windows XP Pro as my
browser/email client. Thunderbird is supported by PGP Desktop.
I recently decided to try SeaMonkey 1.1.15 .
I could experiment and find out, but I believe that
wisdom is learning from the experiences of other
Bob wrote:
I want Seamonkey to stop asking if i want it or not.
David E. Ross wrote:
Me too. I don't want Chinese or Japanese fonts;
I don't read either of those languages. Instead,
I want an option to suppress the request to install those fonts.
You seem to be in an infinite loop.
HeavyDuty wrote:
Anybody know of an internet file posting site?
I can use imageshack.com to post and share out an image
file, but I am wondering about a place to upload to and then
place a link in an e-mail where others can download a file.
Here's a page with some details:
HeavyDuty wrote:
After I learned what the search name was for what I wanted
(file hosting), I searched and tested 15 sites and concluded
that bigfiles.com met my needs best. Very simple interface
and not much advertising. Also, after a ten second delay,
very easy to down load.
It doesn't sound
P.N. wrote:
I wonder, why cacert (http://www.cacert.org/) isn't installed
as a certificates issuer - any problems with it?
Can I trust it, or shouldn't I for some reason?
Starting last Summer, there has been quite a dust-up
over the way Gecko handles certs.
DoctorBill wrote:
[...]led me to right click and Save Target as...[...]
At least now I can bypass SM having to load
Adobe Reader up to see the file.
In addition, double-clicking the downloaded file
doesn't add the bulk of the browser's frame to the PDF viewer's frame,
taking up yet more of your
DoctorBill wrote:
I have been using the Regular downloader
that comes with SeaMonkey 1.1 when I download
(I am on dial-up).
Gecko's Download Manager *is* quite pathetic;
a glaring deficiency in the package.
A Download Manager that won't resume a broken download
shouldn't even be able to call
Rex's Mom wrote:
Well, nothing I have tried has sorted out my video issue.
If *I* was the one having the problem,
things *I* would have considered are:
1) Continue posting to the thread that described the problem.
2) Linked to the thread with the original problem.
3) Described the original
Philip Chee wrote:
Here is another alternative.
First install xSidebar for SeaMonkey:
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/
Then install Scrapbook for SeaMonkey:
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modified.html#scrapbook
Scrapbook is a Firefox extension, which helps you to save Web pages and
easily manage
gNeandr wrote:
[...]SM1.x don't offer a real add-on manager[...]
Also I know SM2 isn't released,
is it wise to recommend it right now ... for such situations??
(Unlike Internet Exploder)
it's possible to keep *multiple* Gecko browsers on your system.
Whether a particular piece of software is apt
and reinstall SM. Then everything works.
JeffM wrote:
Thought about nuking your default profile?
Charles Milton Ling wrote:
Haven't. Would you recommend that?
Well, when you overwrite all the executables with a reinstall,
all that is left is the profile(s)--which are in another location.
(Do I
Michael Gordon wrote:
This is beginning to look like
you have a corrupted installation of SeaMonkey.
Beyond that, it appears
the installation file that was downloaded is corrupt.
[...]Download a fresh copy of SeaMonkey
Agree.
...and make sure the checksum for the download passes muster.
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
