On Apr 1, 9:21 am, Ray_Net wrote:
> Terry R. wrote:
> > The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim,
> > googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
>
> >> On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote:
> >>> The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on
When daylight savings changed, on 1/2 my PCs I had to remove and re-
install the latest DST patch to get things to work.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote:
> The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim,
> googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net
> > wrote:
> >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> >>> On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net
> >>> wrote:
>
On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net
wrote:
> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net
> > wrote:
> >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> >>> Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
> >>> composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
> >>> that star
On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net
wrote:
> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net
> > wrote:
> >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> >>> Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
> >>> composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
> >>> that star
On Mar 30, 9:28 pm, Leonidas Jones wrote:
> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, "Terry R." wrote:
> >> The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim,
> >> googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
>
> >>> On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hi
On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, "Terry R." wrote:
> The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim,
> googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
> > wrote:
> >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> >>> Sorry - i'm viewing on the
On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net
wrote:
> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> > Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
> > composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
> > that starts "Me". When I go into the sent folder and do a view ->
> > message source, the
On Mar 30, 5:41 pm, Leonidas Jones wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>
> > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> >> On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
> >>> again, others have asked that you email them an html
> >>> message and then we'll go from there, and so far you
> >>> have
I agree that, for any message, if you take select Options -> Format ->
send as Rich Text. It will travel as HTML. My request is a way to
make this the default (i.e., override AutoDetect as the default in
Options -> Format). I will now send you an email that, even though is
composed as HTML, and S
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
wrote:
> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
> > Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was
> > trying to be space efficient.
>
> not everyone is viewing this group on google groups.
> Some of us are using the mozilla newsgroup a
Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was
trying to be space efficient.
"If you choose to send in HTML then it wont be converted, it will be
sent as html."
This is a false statement. True statement: "If you choose to send in
HTML, and there is nothing in your messag
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
that starts "Me". When I go into the sent folder and do a view ->
message source, the blank line is there (although the message has been
converted to text).
However
I wish Mozilla did allow me a choice. No matter how hard I try to
have messages go, by default, in HTML. Mozilla looks at them and says
"yeah, plain text is good enough" and converts them.
that's the problem.
All I'm suggesting is an OPTION to disable the auto-conversion. I
can't believe how m
Yes - putting stuff in every message that forces the converter to say
"send in HTML" is a common workaround that a lot of people do (see the
original thread I referenced at the top of this one). Having a fancy
HTML signature also works as a workaround.
In fact, it looks like the workarounds are g
Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50
or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems
sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time,
if I send in a proportional font, I want people to read it in a
proportional font, etc. I
Yes, Thanks for the welcome, but I've been on since '96. Many people
choose to view in the format that people send.
No offense, because this isn't directed primarily at you, but I never
thought I would stumble across a religious "EMail must travel as plain
text if at all possible" war here. I ju
Hi
1) I obviously cannot send you a sample.txt file for an INTERMITTENT
issue.
2) We both agree that, for example, if I write a message in Comic Sans
MS, and want my messages to go out IN THAT FONT (because that's the
way I like people to see my messages), there's no way to do that
without
a) ma
The problem is - I tried just now to create a test message, but it
looked proper when I sent it. Then I looked back in my sent folder.
Out of 6 messages I sent today, one was garbled, the other 5 looked
fine. I don't know how to reproduce the problem on demand as it is
intermittent. But the most
Hi Ray-net - actually a good Email, as you confirmed my issue -
Thanks. However, your conclusions are incorrect...
"if you don't use any html gadget when composing your mail... the mail
is sent in plain text."
I absolutely agree - thanks!
"In this case, there is no need of a conversion, because
I don't designate domains as "text" or "HTML" at all. and my #3
setting is HTML only. Yet, if I type a 1-line message (no signature,
etc), and send it, even to myself, it appears in the sent folder, and
(if i'm the recipient) in my inbox, only as plain text. No one has
said that they do this and
I haven't tried SM2 - still using SM1 - this was a request for SM2
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sir - why would you change the subject of my request, which I have
proven is legitimate, to "OT:"?
I'm sorry your solutions don't work. Your logic "If I can't help him,
then I don't want anyone else to" is so counter to the spirit of this
forum, and this program, that I can't begin to understand
Dear Mr. Potamus...
ME "I have it set to send ONLY HTML, and I get back plain text"
YOU: "if you have the setting to "HTML and Plain text, scroll down to
see the HTML:
ME: "I have it set to send ONLY HTML, and I get back ONLY plain text,
nothing to scroll down to"
YOU: "To view, its: View, Messa
Dear Mr. Potamus. You should really View Message Source and you will
see what i mean. I just sent myself an Email composed in HTML, and
having that setting you refer to set to HTML only. Here's what I
received...
-
Subject: test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; f
Thanks Peter - that's indeed an option, for, as posted "when sending
formatted messages and one or more recipients are not listed as being
able to receive HTML". However, if you don't fill in any HTML or
PlainText Domains, then, regardless of which of the 4 settings you
choose from that menu, Seam
Yes Ray - that option is there - Feel free to set it. I have mine
set. Doesn't make any difference. Seamonkey will STILL convert your
messages to plain text when it thinks it's appropriate. So if you
want to be sure that you send in HTML, you MUST do something for EACH
Email. This is well doc
I only wish I could. The only way to do this requires me to do
Options -> Format -> Rich Text
EVERY TIME I send an email.
If i just write an email, and send it. The conversion is automatic,
unheralded, and unstoppable.
Just a suggestion - read the top of the thread before you reply - it's
all u
I'm sorry - my prior response was incorrect, I misread Lee's message
Hi Lee - What you propose does not in any way solve my problem. No
matter what I select in that window, SM will still convert all
messages to plain text that it thinks can be converted to plain text.
The setting in Preferences
Yes Lee, I can. But I'm a bit tired of having to do Options -> Format
-> Send
for -every- single email that I send.
That's why I'm politely requesting the option "disable auto-
conversion to plain text".
Thanks! 8-}
/j
> Look in Send Format.
>
> You can make your preferred selection there.
>
I agree with Mr. Barclay, but there is much to do and only so much
free labor. So I limit my request to simply providing an option to
turn off the "I think you should send plain text, so I will convert it
for you" feature.
/j
>
> Perhaps there's some lynx or links2 code that could be used in Sea
Add F7 as a keyboard shortcut equivalent to clicking on the SPELL
Icon?
(F7 is the shortcut for Spellcheck in Microsoft Word)
just an idea... I'm so used to using that shortcut...
/j
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On Mar 16, 4:02 pm, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> See the original threads I quoted. What I am asking for,
> > which is
>
> > Disable automatic conversion to plantext.
>
> So the message will be readable by all the mail agents which handle HTML but
> not
> plaintext?
>
> Why do you care? I assume ther
Mr Gehr - that option is there, and does the opposite of what I want
it to do. Not choosing that option does not keep SM from converting
my message. See the original threads I quoted. What I am asking for,
which is
Disable automatic conversion to plan text.
Is NOT a current option anywhere in
Mr. Hansen - I don't think you're following.
In order to "don't do that", I have to go Options->Format->Rich (HTML)
Text, for -every- message. I believe that SM starts with each message
set to HTML, but after I click Send, I believe SM reviews the message
and decides whether to convert to Plain T
"I don't know if SM converts from html to plain text badly or not,
but,
if it does convert badly, wouldn't that be an even better reason to
NOT
send in htlm so that there is no conversion necessary??? "
SM converts from HTML to Plain Text BADLY. Take my word for it.
Biggest problem is that paragr
36 matches
Mail list logo
