I've often thought of the idea of a Footpath editor which could be used in
the field to automatically add footpaths/bridleways to OSM.
It should be possible to do, though it would rely on connecting to the live API
in the field to both read and write data, to avoid duplication.
As it would be
I might be interested depending on the date - missing SOTM for the first time
this year, not because of the distance (I quite fancy seeing Japan) but because
it's difficult to get a lot of time of work in September. Would be good to have
some sort of big OSM meetup locally (as in Western
It is a bit frightening that this sort of thing is required for a mapping
party! Why is the, to my mind, utterly common-sense do it at your own risk, if
you have an accident it's YOUR responsibility, not ours attitude so alien to
the world today?
In other words you shouldn't need insurance,
Locally we have splash-pads where young children can run in and out of a
spray of water. Very useful in hot weather but not something I'd expect to
see in the UK for example
Sorry - just had to comment on this :-) June 2012 is not typical of UK summers!
Typical of UK autumns perhaps though.
What I wouldn't personally like is a mess where the Hampshire ROW line *and*
the line on the ground are *both* in OSM. This would make the data messy and
confusing to work with.
In cases like this maybe the ROW has, to all intents and purposes, shifted and
the Hampshire data is out-of-date.
Hi,
As promised I've put together a summary blog post on how I produced OpenHants
(simple site overlying the Hampshire rights-of-way data on a kothic-js based
OSM map), this can be found at:
http://www.free-map.org.uk/wordpress/?p=247
Nick
___
This is not HCC doing something with OSM - this is HCC releasing their
rights-of-way data under an open licence. The link provided is my own mash-up
of OSM and HCC data.
Nick
-Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote: -
To: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
From: Gregory
Hello Rob,
Sorry for the late reply on this. Basically how it works is:
- the shapefile was converted to Postgres SQL using shp2pgsql;
- the data was imported into a PostGIS database;
- some custom code (actually same underlying code as Freemap) was written to
fetch data as GeoJSON from the
Hello everyone,
Re: the Hampshire ROW data - this is the response I got from the person I am in
contact with.
In answer to the queries below, the data is free to use as is the OS
open data on their website.
The data was originally captured against the 10k raster data, meaning it
carried OS
Hello Gregory,
The quotes are used to quote the email. So the 'so in summary...' bit is mine
and the 'so in short' is theirs.
Nick
-Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote: -
To: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
From: Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com
Date: 11/06/2012 02
Hello everyone,
Re: the Hampshire ROW data - this is the response I got from the person I am in
contact with.
In answer to the queries below, the data is free to use as is the OS
open data on their website.
The data was originally captured against the 10k raster data, meaning it
carried OS
Hello Gregory,
The quotes are used to quote the email. So the 'so in summary...' bit is mine
and the 'so in short' is theirs.
Nick
-Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote: -
To: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
From: Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com
Date: 11/06/2012 02
Hello Rob, (and all)
I've emailed the Hants CC guy once - he was away so the email bounced.
I've emailed him again tonight.
Nick
-Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: -
To: talk...@openstreetmap.org, nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk,
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Rob
Hello Rob, (and all)
I've emailed the Hants CC guy once - he was away so the email bounced.
I've emailed him again tonight.
Nick
-Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: -
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org, nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk,
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
From: Rob
Hi,
While waiting for the decision as to whether we should use the Hants CC data,
I've started work on a small side-project OpenHants which overlays the Hants
CC footpath data as a separate layer on top of a kothic-js rendered OSM map
(basically same server side code as for Freemap). Footpaths
Looking at other locales (e.g. fr, de) it's interesting how few English place
names have local names in other languages compared to the other way round (or
at least have been tagged as such in OSM) - only London seems to have local
names - whereas many towns in Germany and Italy (less so
(UCRs)
While we're on this topic actually, I notice that West Sussex has started
signing these Public Way. Not public byway, or public bridleway, but just
plain public way - you can tell them because formerly there was no waymarking
at all.
Nick
Hello everyone,
Some good news! As from yesterday, Hampshire County Council have released their
Rights of Way data under the OS OpenData licence.
Details here:
http://www3.hants.gov.uk/communications/mediacentre/mediareleases.htm?newsid=534104
Slippy map, and downloadable raw data (shp or kml
Hence, unfortunately, I don't think we can use the Hampshire data
(going forward under ODbL) unless we get explicit permission from the
copyright holders. For the maps, this would presumably mean both the
council and OS. It's a real pain that OS felt it necessary to fork the
Open Government
I guess the thing to do is just use the most common reference.
I am aware of several schemes:
Hampshire uses parish plus number e.g. Tichborne Footpath 5, West Sussex uses
a county-wide, 3 or 4 digit number (e.g. 1263, 2005) and I've also seen XXX/YY
(in Wrexham borough, Wales) and very
Whatever. I've certainly seen footpaths classified as roads in commercial
online maps for instance.
This is a very one sided argument and assumes that commercial online maps are
accurate. It also completely neglects the fact that you can use OSM data
without a fee andf without someone telling
Sorry but I do have to say this. In an area (UK outside of Scotland)
where sadly, you're not free to roam where you like, access rights are
*absolutely vital detail* for walkers and other users of the countryside
and indicating them explicitly where known, either via designation, or
People map to the level of detail they're comfortable with, and that's a
strength not a weakness. Legal designations, access rights and surface
type are pointless detail to a new mapper.
Sorry but I do have to say this. In an area (UK outside of Scotland) where
sadly, you're not free to roam
P.S. Please don't yawn in your emails, it's rude.
Seconded. There's no need for this sort of disrespectful rudeness and sarcasm
on this list.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 02/05/12 16:41, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
One project goal might be to consolidate the various scattered
information on the wiki describing how to map RoWs in the first place.
Come up with *one* consensus approach. We seem to be settling on
designation=* + highway={foot,cycle,bridle}way
One project goal might be to consolidate the various scattered
information on the wiki describing how to map RoWs in the first place.
Come up with *one* consensus approach. We seem to be settling on
designation=* + highway={foot,cycle,bridle}way, by the looks of it (full
disclosure; it's the
I have used suspected=orpa for one or two of these in Hampshire. By doing
this you're not stating it's a right of way, but on the other hand you are
adding additional information which means it's *more likely to be* a right of
way than a random path through private land used as an informal
We probably shouldn't be using ORPA in OSM as this is an OS-specific
term, that AFAIK only exists on their maps.
I'm not so sure. In Hampshire in particular there are large numbers of tracks
which obviously have public access (e.g. footpaths end on them, evidence of
frequent foot/horse use)
I'm up for it. Finding enough to sustain a mapping party might be
difficult (South Hants is more or less road and footpath complete) but
we could make it a social. Anyone else interested?
Andy
Yes, I'd be interested. Robert - I'm aware of you via 'robbieonsea' edits
(usually in the
It is a bit early though, they're normally late April/Early May.
I have seen a few this year though.
I guess the warm March and cold, wet April must confuse a fair few things,
though it seems a good one for blossom. The colder weather seems to have put a
brake on the over-advanced development
Maybe we should organize an East Hampshire OSM people (maybe for a pub walk
/ or mapping party ) get together some time this summer - it would be
great to meet AndyS, NickW and any other like minded individuals.
I'm up for it. Finding enough to sustain a mapping party might be
difficult
Had some quite extraordinary problems trying to get a GPS signal this afternoon
in the Fisherstreet area, on the Surrey/W Sussex border a few miles SE of
Haslemere.
Between around 1300 and 1400 BST I could get no signal whatsoever. I lost the
signal in a wooded area around 1255 BST and then
Andy's aware of it. Could be zealotry or an honest mistake by an inexperienced
mapper... that or someone's used it as a nuclear test site :-)
Nick
-Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote: -
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
From: Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com
Date: 29/03/2012
On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with
odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with iffy
sources?
While we're on this topic, could I urge all of those working
While we're on this topic, could I urge all of those working on Andy Street's
area
to remap all constituent nodes of a way, rather than just the way itself,
I've
come across at least 3 users who have re-constructed ways but left Andy's nodes
intact. I'd have thought that remapping the ways
I ask as I am intending to do some remapping of Andy Street's paths in the
Bishops Waltham/Meon Valley area and wondering whether I have to actually
walk the paths again or just tag with odbl=clean
You don't have to walk the path if you can map it using other
techniques, such as GPS traces,
Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with
odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with iffy
sources?
I ask as I am intending to do some remapping of Andy Street's paths in the
Bishops Waltham/Meon Valley area and wondering whether I have to
I'm trying to do footpaths as and when, but it'll be a slow process as I've got
quite a lot of other things on my plate at the moment.
I've done a few round Bishops Waltham and the Meon Valley, and may well do more
this weekend, but I'd welcome any other contributions as there is no way I am
Hi,
As from yesterday (March 18th) the default version of Freemap
(www.free-map.org.uk; UK OSM-based countryside mapping site) has become the
kothic-js based 0.6.
As well as client-side rendering using kothic-js, the new version features
* Ability to add annotations to the map (as before)
I tried the route we went on holiday as a family in the 80s... Fernhurst, W
Sussex, to Münstertal in Germany. Impressively fast.
The route was much as I remember as far as Reims... but then, rather than
routing you along the A4 autoroute to Strasbourg and then down the German
autobahn (forget
+1
I don't have a problem with people surveying us for research purposes, even if
they do not contribute to the project.
What harm does it do?
Obviously surveying us for marketing purposes is rather more iffy, and any
survey made for that purpose should be clearly warned as such.
Nick
sp far has been based on 6-month old mapping trips from
last summer/autumn) rather than copying tags from the old CC-SA.
Nick
-Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote: -
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
Date: 09/03/2012 11:50AM
As for the data consumers, Australia does have one great advantage: you're
an island (albeit a big one!). That makes it perfectly possible for data
consumers to use pre-1st April Australia data and post-1st April for the
rest of the world - probably three lines of Osmosis or so, and a slightly
Yes, it is OSM. Look at the layout of the footpaths on that green/open area in
the Portsmouth example.
I actually remember surveying that as part of the Portsmouth mapping party a
couple of years ago...
There are other footpaths on that green area which I didn't get time to do. And
they're
I agree. Another reason not to is that the looming deadline is actually
motivating people to stop waiting for CT-undecideds to respond and do
remapping - I know it's motivating me and other people I've talked to.
Take away the deadline and you demotivate remappers, while also putting
off the
Hello everyone,
As I've said before there is quite a major problem with Hampshire rights of way
post-licence-change, due to the fact that very large numbers of footpaths in
mid-Hampshire were contributed by a declining former mapper, Andy Street, and
they will be deleted. Since this is my
I think both have their advantages - I like the idea of a good signposted
rights of way network, but I intensely dislike the Anglo-American attitude
towards private property compared to say Scotland or Germany (naming two
countries I've walked in where they seem to be more easy-going)
On the
Hi,
As I've indicated already, in my local area - Hampshire - there are very large
numbers of footpaths contributed by a former mapper who has declined the CTs
and so obviously I'm concerned about the impact of April 1st.
Remapping these on the ground is going to be a huge job and something
3. Re-marking countryside source=npe stuff traced by people (normally
back in OSM history before highway=path was invented). Because OS New
Popular Edition maps were made before rights of way were codified,
it's impossible to tell if a dotted line on the old map is a bridleway
or a footpath - or
---
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#JOSM_presets_now_available
Comments on these presets and how they might be improved are welcome!
I may have not been reading this list thoroughly but I did not realise
that highway=path is a vexed issue. I have
This is a somewhat contentious issue, but all I can say is that this is
precisely what I do and several others.
Remember to also use the designation tag to specify the rights,
public_footpath / public_bridleway / byway_open_to_all_traffic etc.
highway is generally taken to indicate the physical
since a few weeks, we had the idea for a global action, that we'd like
to announce today: www.nightofthelivingmaps.org
At Thursday, the 07.02.2012 we stay awake a whole night long, to trace
aerial imagery for the areas, that where we currently lack a lot of
informations: the countryside.
Hi Mike and Graham,
We should not assume that contributors' acceptance of the new licence means
that they are particularly in favour of it - they may have just accepted
because it was easier than getting involved in the argument, and did not see
it as doing any harm. From a personal
Actually this is probably a perfect example of the sort of stuff that SHOULD
be
available as secondary layers? Like the contour information on freemap would
be
nice as a selectable layer.
Incidentally it is already available as a vector layer (GeoJSON or own-format
XML) as it happens, e.g.
Just to add: this is OS LandForm PANORAMA contour data so any use needs to be
credited to them.
Nick
-Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent wrote: -
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent
Date: 25/01/2012 01:29PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] proprietary keys and values, machine
Hi,
Do you mean a geojson overlay on a mapnik map, i.e. markers?
I think openlayers has a geojson layer: Leaflet certainly does.
There's some material on the Leaflet site on creating a geojson layer.
You might also want to look at
http://www.free-map.org.uk/course/ewt/webmapping2.xhtml
Nick
; see examples on the webmapping2.xhtml page).
A 'drag end' event is captured; this then then sends an AJAX request to a
GeoJSON server. Again see the Leaflet site for explanation of how it works.
Nick
-Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: -
To: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
Hi,
Have sent this both here and to the fosm mailing list.
Anyway, to summarise I don't care about the licence and am fully intending to
continue contributing to OSM after the licence change.
However I am concerned about severe loss of footpath data in my area and
consequently I'm looking to
I'd just like to add that one of the top contributors down as declined is
actually undecided due to Ordnance Survey OpenData compatibility concerns, not
sure why he's down as declined, whether that was a mistake on his part.
I've emailed him to get him to decide one way or the other, but as I
Hello everyone,
Just a reminder that I will be in the Llangollen area, North Wales, from Monday
2nd Jan (11.30am) until late afternoon Thursday 5th if anyone fancies any new
year mapping / walking to work off Christmas over-eating :-)
Please sign up on the wiki page
Hi,
Over Christmas I've been knocking together a demo which uses kothic-js client
side rendering for Freemap, incorporating LandForm PANORAMA contours.
You can see it at http://www.free-map.org.uk/0.6/; full details on the blog
post at http://www.free-map.org.uk/wordpress/?p=221. It's best
Hi,
I've mentioned this before, but have actually booked some accommodation now so
it's definitely happening.
I'm staying in the Llangollen area of North Wales for a few days in the new
year, from Monday January 2 to Thursday January 5, aiming to do some walking
and mapping. It's a hilly and
As I posted a month or two ago I have prepared some tiles containing Vector Map
District raster tiles overlaid with LandForm Panorama contours.
For the past two months or so they have been available as a slippy map on
Freemap (http://www.free-map.org.uk/vmd/). However, they are taking a huge
One option would be to develop a separate app, of course: the osmdroid library
for Android is fairly easy to use if you know Java.
Nick
-Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: -
To: andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
From: Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org
Date: 16/12/2011 04:05PM
Doesn't make any difference to the CTs, but I've noticed but I'm not the first
named author of a few ways which I'm 99.99% sure that I created: the ways with
the ID 2232-2235. I still remember the surveying/editing session in which I
created the ways.
These were very early ways (spring 2006)
(I'm also keen BTW to deal with a possible licencing issue here.
A long-standing contributor has mapped many footpaths in
Hampshire already but has not signed up to the CTs. Naturally
I'm keen not to see all his hard work lost, and TBH, while I'm
licence-neutral, I've got better things
Yes indeed. Just looked at Fernhurst, W Sussex for instance. The place is
absolutely crawling with non-existent roads.
Seems anything tagged with highway=track in OSM would qualify as a road in
that...
Nick
-Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: -
To: talk-gb OSM List
Hello everyone,
2012 could be the year in which we complete, or almost complete, all the
rights of way in some English counties. One likely target is my local county -
Hampshire. OSM road coverage of many parts of the UK is virtually complete in
many areas, but footpaths are still lagging
. Seriously tempted to give it a play.
Nick
-Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: -
To: d...@openstreetmap.org
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Date: 01/12/2011 01:42PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] speeding up loading an OSM dump into PostGIS?
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
It's certainly
It worked well. It planned a route to the bus terminal in Seoul, which
generally matched the route the bus actually took (naturally, I had no
influence over the route the driver took). The moving map is quite
mesmerising and all drawn from OSM vector data in real time.
Incidentally do any of
Hello everyone,
Thought I'd email this as I have some thoughts as to how Freemap
(free-map.org.uk; countryside-orientated mapping for UK users) could operate
without excessive demands on a single server.
Basically, I'm wondering if anyone has unused server space/bandwidth allowances
who might
to donate money of course.
Nick
-Philip Stubbs phi...@stuphi.co.uk wrote: -
To: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
From: Philip Stubbs phi...@stuphi.co.uk
Date: 24/11/2011 03:01PM
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone interested in participating
Side issue re. Overpass API
How might it compare with the osm2pgsql route (in performance, and memory usage
for the import process) for running a local API for a fairly small area, and
with limited data, e.g. highways and wood/water feature polygons in the UK?
I have rather limited memory
If SOTM could be later in July, that would be super duper awesome for people
who want to attend both.
One issue with this for UK people at least is that excessive fares could be
charged for travel due to the Olympics. Apparently Eurostar are only charging
premium fares between mid July and
Hello everyone,
I have a week I can take off immediately after new year, so was wondering
whether anyone would be interested in a countryside-orientated mapping party
then. I know it's not the ideal time of year for outdoor events, but I thought
starting the new year with a mapping party
Hi,
Not sure who maintains the out-of-copyright stuff, but I thought I'd best ask
this in the light of recent discussions.
I am developing an Android app OpenTrail - which amongst other things shows
tiles from Freemap (my own) plus out-of-copyright tiles from
ooc.openstreetmap.org. I have
Anyone else got opinions on the date? We could go for a two day mapping
party?
I
might be interested depending on the type of mapping. Not so interested
in addressing etc, but if it's road surveying/naming I'd be tempted.
ATM can do any weekend except 12/13th.
Nick
Thought it would be a good time to ask about this as the whole topic of running
your own OSM tileserver has come up a lot lately.
Am wanting to develop Freemap (coubtryside-orientated OSM site) and its mobile
client, OpenTrail, further but the thing that's always holding me back, and
forcing
Hi,
Did an initial experiment with this a while back but now I've extended the area
of coverage to include much of England and all of Wales.
Anyway, Freemap-VMD (working title) is a combination of VectorMap District
raster tiles, LandForm PANORAMA contours and rights of way and permissive
Hi,
Did an initial experiment with this a while back but now I've extended the
area of coverage to include much of England and all of Wales.
[snip]
Oops - forgot the URL! http://www.free-map.org.uk/vmd/
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Hello Mick,
See my reply to you about this.
Nick
-Mick bare...@tpg.com.au wrote: -
To: talk@openstreetmap.org talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Mick bare...@tpg.com.au
Date: 20/10/2011 04:49AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] 'wget'ing largish portion of planetOSM
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:58:28 -0400
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I've downloaded all of UK from nick.dev.openstreetmap.org and
extracted the bit I want, its a bit old (28 Oct 2009) but mayhap I can
update it without massive downloads. I've got most of the area current
to last week.
It's your decision entirely of course but I utterly
Mick,
On 10/20/11 08:22, Mick wrote:
I've downloaded all of UK from nick.dev.openstreetmap.org and
extracted the bit I want, its a bit old (28 Oct 2009) but mayhap I
can update it without massive downloads. I've got most of the area
current to last week.
It's your decision
-Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: -
Hi,
just a quick note that (because some people were asking) I've now
added a daily Greater London .osm.pbf/.shp.zip to
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/great_britain/england/
This includes, somewhat incorrectly I guess, the
Please bear in mind that, even if we wanted to offer free tiles to every
commercial app in the world, our hosts would not permit us to do so. Nor is
it OSM's role to give OpenMaps a competitive advantage by providing it with
a free server when (for example) the OffMaps developers offer similar
Having the OSMF provide commercial tiles is a bad idea. It would:
- reduce services available to the community
- hurt the community by competing against it
Why do I think that having the OSMF provide commercial tiles is such a
bad idea?
Hi Richard, yes I can see there are some issues
Related to the ongoing discussion on talk, and given the large memory
requirements of osm2pgsql imports, has anyone published a tiled import
script, where the import area is broken into say degree tiles, and each tile
imported as a separate osm2pgsql job? If not, I'm inclined to do one myself
-
Related to the ongoing discussion on talk, and given the large memory
requirements of osm2pgsql imports, has anyone published a tiled import
script, where the import area is broken into say degree tiles, and each tile
imported as a separate osm2pgsql job? If not, I'm inclined to do one
Hello everyone,
There will be a footpaths orientated mapping party in the Dunsfold and
Chiddingfold area, S Surrey, on Saturday October 22nd. Surrey is mostly
complete - even footpaths - but there is still a big gap in this area.
Details here:
Hello everyone,
Partly following on from the recent Shere mapping party, I'd like to hold a
footpaths mapping party in the Dunsfold area of Surrey sometime in the next
month, before the evenings get too dark. I'm extending to the first weekend in
November but after that it really will be
Hi 80n,
Sorry I'm missing this - but I just arrived back from Colorado yesterday and
have had a family occasion too, so consequently a bit tired!
Would be good to know of any missing footpaths still in that area though after
today - am looking for an excuse to do some in-fill Surrey footpath
I would go so far as to say, don't delete *anything* until legally you
absolutely have to. There are a number of non-CT-accepting contributors in my
area, for instance, and I don't think the map should be interfered with unless
it's absolutely necessary. Remember that by doing so, the quality
Could this be distributed to other parts of the UK I wonder?
The Monarch's Way passes near me, we could probably do something down south too.
Nick
-SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: -
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
From: SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
Date:
From: Steve Dobson st...@dobbo.org
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sat, 20 August, 2011 16:44:45
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] To delete or not to delete, that is the question...
Nick
On 20/08/11 14:52, Phil Endecott wrote:
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Around Easter
[snip]
Someone suggested the definitive map, maybe I'll see if the relevant council
(it's not my local one) has an online map and verify it with that.
As it happens, the problem seems to have gone away. Since I originally surveyed
the track, the designation tag has been removed by an
Had an experience yesterday which raises an interesting legal question. Around
Easter 2010, IIRC, I surveyed what appeared to be a footpath in good faith: the
footpath sign appeared to point down a gravel track across a field. Yesterday,
as part of another mapping expedition, I followed said
To: Nick Whitelegg nick_whitel...@yahoo.co.uk
From: Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
Date: 20/08/2011 11:23AM
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org, legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] To delete or not to delete, that is the question...
On 20/08/11 11:11, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
This does
Interesting site! Would agree that a zoom would be nice.
Not sure where my edits in the eastern central USA, Taiwan and western Africa
have come from (nickw), as I've not visited any of these places - I'm guessing
these were from early experiments with the API back in the day.
Nick
Yes surely that is the situation - use the source tag when using something
other than gps.
I have accepted the ToC, TBH I really don't give a monkeys either way though
have something of a preference for PD as it keeps life simpler, and I believe
the small minority of OS OpenData I have
I don't normally get involved in licencing stuff, but I disagree with
unnecessary data destruction.
While I have accepted the CTs, and to be honest don't care one way or the other
about ODBL, CC, etc I would urge most strongly that this is *not* done. Tim
is a decent guy and has
301 - 400 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
