Kansas just tested them this morning. There is one on the roof of the
building I work in. But even looking at the high res (1m) photos
available from the county GIS website, all I can see is there is
something there but I can't pick out a distinctive siren shape. This
would definitely take boots
My county uses ArcIMS to serve up their GIS data. I have received
permission to use their 6 resolution aerial photos for tracing things
in OSM and when asked about accessing the data, I was pointed at the
ArcExplorer software. Now I just need to figure out how to use it. It
seems like ArcExplorer
familiar with this
format and/or would there be much demand in the OSM community for
something that uses it?
Toby
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
My county uses ArcIMS to serve up their GIS data. I have received
permission to use their 6 resolution aerial
, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Toby,
Toby Murray wrote:
Oh cool. Do you know how to determine if the server is indeed running
the WMS Connector and what the URL would be? I found a how to
configure page about the connector which seems to indicate that it
should live at /servlet
According to the Key:source page on the wiki, an object can have
multiple source tags. So if you go out and survey a TIGER road and
discover that the name is incorrect you could change the name and add
a source:name=survey tag. I guess this allows you to distinguish the
source of specific elements
Another thing I noticed with the GNIS data is that it doesn't seem to
distinguish between airports and helipads. There was an airport in the
middle of my city and I wondered where in the world that data came
from. Turns out the coordinates were off by a mile which didn't help
but it is actually a
I just downloaded the Kansas extract from cloudmade:
http://downloads.cloudmade.com/north_america/united_states/kansas
After rendering I noticed that the northern border was missing.
Looking at it some more, the extract seems to be cut off about a half
mile too far south. The cutoff for the other
It doesn't seem too far behind. Maybe a couple of weeks. New features
I added in early June are there but a few I did more recently aren't.
Also, I see they are rendering highway shields. Didn't I see a big
discussion about that here recently? :)
Wonder if they are using the route relations to
Well I took a look at the blog post with the technical details. They
are using a vanilla osm2pgsql/mapnik setup, just custom styles from
Cartifact. They mention enhancing mapnik. Have these changes already
made it back upstream or will that happen in the future? In particular
I'm guessing the
are
there? It doesn't really make much sense to represent information
about such a large area in a single point on the map.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I was commenting the other day on IRC
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Curious why they use a starburst symbol that looks
like an explosion for the trailblazer shield, though.
It's a sunflower :)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the goals of the chapter is collect this data and work with
governments (and other organizations) who wish to make their data
available to OSM.
Great!
So, even charging isn't an awful thing, if the rest of the
I'm not really speaking for/against abbreviations in general, just
adding information. It would definitely be Pkwy and Blvd. The USPS has
documented standards for prefixes, suffixes and any other fixes you
may want. 208 pages worth:
http://pe.usps.com/cpim/ftp/pubs/pub28/pub28.pdf
Toby
On Tue,
So I was happily tracing a lake last night when I noticed a bunch of
completely unconnected nodes with no tags in the area. I mentioned it
on IRC and came up with a couple of JOSM filters to weed them out and
ended up deleting over 2,000 of them around the lake.
Looking at them last night I
Alrighty then. Glad that's sorted out. I hope my deleting a couple
thousand of the nodes won't make reverting more difficult.
As a side note, I was using the USGS NAIP imagery to trace the lake
when I noticed these nodes. So on balance I don't think I'll hold it
against you :)
Toby
On Thu, Aug
://www.microimages.com/geodata/us-orthophotos/
-Eric
-=--=---===---=--=-=--=---==---=--=-=-
Eric B. Wolf 720-334-7734
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Alrighty then. Glad that's sorted out. I hope my deleting
Looks like it was actually Ian who posted this WMS URL a couple weeks ago:
http://isse.cr.usgs.gov/ArcGIS/services/Combined/USGS_EDC_Ortho_NAIP/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetMapformat=image/jpegservice=WMSversion=1.1.0layers=0STYLES=default;
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Toby Murray
I have been curious about this as well. In my opinion it would be
great to be able to update untouched TIGER ways with the new data. I
agree that this would likely have to be a county-by-county decision.
Could there be a tool like OWL but that would allow looking at a whole
county at a time to
Bah! All you city slickers. I'm a 2 hour drive from any semblance of
an urban area (Kansas City). I suppose if there were regular meetups I
would probably make an effort to make it to at least some of them.
Other than that, Denver is probably the nearest city but it is 8 hours
away. Guess I need
Well just for fun I fixed one speed limit bug. However I am not
comfortable fixing most of the speed limit bugs in the area I was
looking at (Wichita, KS) because they are just points and do not
describe for how long the reported speed limit is valid. The speed
limit is 50 at this location isn't
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
This is why we have route relations. It's getting to the point of
ridiculous that we don't have proper rendering of something as basic as
a route relation.
Didn't we determine that Mapquest is most likely using
So to get back to the basics of this thread... I think we can all
agree that we should (and are) using relations to represent highway
routes and that we need to get renderer support for route relations
ASAP.
So then the question is what tags to use on relations. From what I
have seen in the wiki
So I just started my first blog on Friday night. I made the first real
post today about a class project I just finished in which I made a
thematic map concerning the TIGER ways in Kansas. I'm hoping it will
further the discussion about the 2010 TIGER data. The blog made it's
worldwide debut on IRC
Odd. I-70 shields are only missing between Topeka and Oakley. On the
other hand, all of I-135 is missing shields.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2010-July/003672.html
The results are a bit different
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
Some have commented that placing exit sign information in the name results
in a cluttered map because the name renders instead of the ref. I agree
with this.
I am not opposed to changing however just to be clear, both mapnik
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 10/25/2010 08:43 AM, Zeke Farwell wrote:
For Michigan route 12:
ref=12
network=state
state=michigan
For Bennington County route 16 in Vermont:
ref=16
network=county
state=vermont
county=bennington
I like it,
A friend of mine found a flickr set from MODOT with more aerial
imagery (not rectified but high resolution)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/26387...@n06/sets/72157621103069705
This makes it obvious that there is indeed a direct link over to
Norton and that it is open as you can see cars driving on
Someone in my area decided to try and make a bicycle map. He used this scheme:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Class:bicycle
And rendered this map:
http://bikemanhattan.info/
Now I know people are going to complain that this is a subjective tag
and that it shouldn't be in OSM. And I don't
I think there is pretty good consensus on interstates and US highways as far
as rendering goes. As I recall the debate centered about how to tag them and
also whether to render individual state shields since there is much more
variety and some of them may not look as good at low pixel counts.
But
Well I've been using it in JOSM for a good chunk of the day now,
editing I-70 in western Kansas and eastern Colorado along my drive to
wherecamp. It has been working pretty well. Every once in a while it
seems to slow down a bit but it is certainly usable.
I am using the tilecache in the imagery
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24,
which was cut down to a couple ways in western Kansas for a few
months.
Hmm it wasn't me who broke US 24 out west, was it? I have been known
to tinker
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
How much of that is there, anyway?
Look at the TIGER edited map. There is *lots* of untouched TIGER data in
OSM:
http://open.mapquestapi.com/tigerviewer/index.html?zoom=9lat=40.07546lon=-76.32layers=B
At the risk of
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
Looks like any road that was last edited by balrog-kun is set to red,
regardless of where it came from originally.
Yes, yesterday we determined that the TIGER edited map only looks at
the latest version of a way.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
I don't know how to back to git directly, plus I have no way to test
this, but I've attached the logic to check TIGER version as I understand it.
At first I thought this wasn't quite right but actually I guess it
might be. The
Nice!
Slight bug: It looks like amenity=bench nodes are being labeled with
with push pins when you select the dollar sign labeled Banks in the
show me this category bar at the top.
There are no banks in this park. There ARE however 4 benches :)
http://open.mapquest.com/link/8-qDCJmGzf
Toby
On
We have discussed [1] a cheaper way of doing it to at least be a
better approximation and Antony commented on my blog saying that they
would try to incorporate this.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2010-December/004977.html
(and the following 3 messages)
Toby
On Tue, Dec 21,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Having said that - this is what he had in mind when we invented addr:*,
but of course if the wider community wants to use addr:* for different
stuff then I guess we cannot keep them from it...
It looks like the
My county seems to be pretty good. I haven't done any work on the
relation itself, just aligning the member ways. But I believe it is
complete and well tagged. Individual ways are shared with the
neighboring county's boundary relation which makes sense
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
Sorry, the village of Summerhaven, which I totally reworked in Sep 2009 is
still shown in red:
http://open.mapquestapi.com/tigerviewer/index.html?zoom=12lat=32.438lon=-110.75635layers=B
I haven't checked every way in
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
The OpenCycleMap elevation data comes from the SRTM dataset, which was
obtained by taking stereoscopic images from the Space Shuttle.
I thought the R stood for Radar, not steReoscopic? But yes, SRTM data
is known for being
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:57 -0500, Phil! Gold wrote:
(TopOSM also shows a lot of intermittent streams from the USGS National
Hydrography Dataset.)
Can we get this USGS dataset loaded? It would be more accurate than
Seems like out here in Kansas/Nebraska a lot of cities are a member of
some tri-city region but I think it is almost always made up by the
local weather man who just wants a quick way to refer to this area
here while pointing at his magic green screen. It is nothing I would
want to see on a map.
*Like*
The bicycle router picks almost the exact route I take to work when I
tell it to avoid hills.
One thing I've noticed is that starting and ending positions are kind
of weird when they involve a building polygon. I'm guessing buildings
are reduced to a centroid point in the routing engine
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I looked it up again, and I was partly wrong. Turns out only five
states disallow bicycles statewide on freeways: Ohio, Minnesota, Maine,
Indiana, Hawaii and Georgia. The rest may allow it and post such
restrictions at
For what it's worth, I did something similar here in Kansas. The
Department of Transportation didn't have any obvious notices about
copyright on the website so I sent them an email and asked. They
replied and said that all the maps published on their website are
public domain. So I added exit
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
User ToeBee has, in several changesets in February, aligned state borders to
exact lat/long. The problem is that this is not how the borders are defined;
instead they are based on work that the 19th century surveyors
Thank you for the apology.
I don't think that revert is going to happen though. Even if I agreed
that this was the solution, it would be a nightmare. I did a lot of
boundary work in that changeset involving splitting circular county
border ways, creating relations, deleting superfluous nodes and
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
That's nowhere near the extent of the damage.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?node=83787064 is supposed to be on the state
line. On
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/topo/250k/txu-pclmaps-topo-us-moab-1962.jpg
(a bit
The western border has been aligned. I'm not in the business of making
guarantees but in general I believe the error should be under 10
meters, compared to the TIGER shapefile. And yes, the shapefile has
the border running a few meters to the north of the center of the Four
Corners Monument,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to apologize for specifically naming ToeBee and Techlady in subject
lines, and any connotation that may have been attached to screwup. The
former was my error at reading the tea leaves of node histories, and
In rural areas, the names on the sign tend to be towns that may be
upwards of 10 miles away from the interstate.
Example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.0631lon=-96.2784zoom=13layers=M
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Andrew Cleveland
evil.salt...@gmail.com wrote:
Though that might be making things more complicated than they need to be.
Yes. It is unreasonable to expect mappers to use special characters.
That is just asking for inconsistencies in our data. IMHO, if it can't
be
Yeah... consensus would be great but seems to be rather elusive.
Here is a case in point. Another mapper has been tagging ways on
Kansas highways as K-xx which is how people usually pronounce it.
Street signs usually just have the number inside of the sunflower logo
without any kind of lettering
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Craig Hinners cr...@hinnerspace.com wrote:
Of course, it would be desirable to have consensus on the syntax of the
conceptual-level tag, be it highway:network:us:fl=123, or
highway:network=us:fl:123, or highway=fl:123, but that's a
diversion from the crux of the
Every time I go editing in some new place, I always find another
reason to hate imports.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5186568
I will contact this user and revert the changeset shortly.
Dear importers: CHECK YOUR SHIT!
kthx,
Toby
___
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
I didn't look very far, but
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5190419 also looks bad: old
upload, all nodes, an area sampling shows a string of ghost nodes. There
are probably other bad imports there also.
Arg! I was
So it gets worse. It seems that the failure of this changeset was
probably noticed. Later the same day, another changeset[1] was created
that uploaded duplicate nodes but also got at least some (but
apparently not all) of the ways in there.
Then some god damned bot came along and merged all the
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can catch the xapi when it's up,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Xapi#Child_Element_Predicates might be
easier. Unfortunately I don't think you can do both [not(tag)] and
[not(way)], so you'll have to filter
OK, seriously... I guess I just need to save myself some effort and
start using a form letter for this.
I was looking at more untagged/unconnected nodes in the area and found
two more users who left a steaming pile of nodes in their wake:
jumbanho:
jumbanho does indeed have nodes in Minnesota which brings his total in
the area up to 10,569
And I discovered some new badness in Minnesota.
Jeff Ollie with an impressive 60,290 empty nodes.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3845229
Most of the features uploaded by him seem to have
Just added talk-us since this affects the US map. To summarize for
anyone new to this thread:
Someone in Arkansas started importing massive amounts of parcel data
against community advice and with technical deficiencies. The uploads
were stopped and I was under the impression that they had all
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Nathan Mills nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011 12:09:30 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm thinking the differences between motorways and trunks are minor.
Trunks may have intersections, motorways don't.
That's the simple way to state my opinion. It
FYI the early bird sale ends in 5 hours :)
Toby
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
One of the first times I remember having a similar thought of how do
I tag this? was with the office supply store Staples. I ended up
using shop=office but doing a quick XAPI query now I see that out of
the ~250 Staples shops mapped, the tags look like this like this:
6 office_supply
17
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/29/2011 3:28 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
mailto:nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/29/2011 2:49 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
It also avoids the
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
By that logic all tags should have dates. Perhaps a fair point, but not
where tagging is.
On manually mapped data, the tag is known to be accurate as of the day
it was added to the way and can be viewed in the way history.
Tiles are not being re-rendered after edits right now because of this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_Maintenance_Q3_2011
I'm not sure why it disappeared but if you look at the data, it is
clearly there so I would wait until the current outage is over and the
tile rendering has caught
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Henk Hoff toffeh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com wrote:
And once we set our standard here in the US, how do we get it adopted
world-wide?
-
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
Shared routes use semi-colons, like any other multi-use object.
ref=CA 60;I 215
or
network=US:CA;US:I
ref=60;215
Difficult to
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jason Straub strau...@yahoo.com wrote:
As the person that just got done labelling each TX state highway, I'll chime
in here with some comments.
For the network tag, I think that the labelling should be (country : state
network : network within the state :
Frederik's message on the imports mailing list reminded me... I was
going to ask if anyone knows about the import performed in these two
changesets in California:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9090477
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9091078
The result is clearly
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/31/2011 9:57 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
Anyways that is why I am interested in how you plan to attack it.
I haven't started, but I plan to convert to .osm using gpsbabel and then use
the JOSM 'routes' plugin to color
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/1/2011 1:19 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/31/2011 9:57 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
Anyways that is why I am interested in how you plan
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/1/2011 2:16 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/FL_maxspeed.osm.gz
If you have trouble dealing with the extra spaces I can clean it up
tomorrow. Bed time now. But it looks like it is just putting
Re: Kansas
Every person riding a bicycle upon a roadway shall be granted all of the
rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of
a vehicle ...
Toby
On Sep 9, 2011 10:00 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:55 -0400, Anthony wrote:
This might be partially a tagging issue but I think it affects rendering
too.
It would be nice to change the zoom level at which cities/towns are rendered
in rural areas. I should not be able to get a map with no place names on it
in western Kansas
Toby
On Sep 12, 2011 6:15 PM, Jeffrey Ollie
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Brad Neuhauser
brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
Towns appear at zoom level 9 in Mapnik, which seems pretty decent to me.
There are tagged towns in SW Kansas that show up, but some villages
probably need retagging to towns in the N and W. The Place page
/9365434
These changesets are all nodes. I assume the ways are coming in a
subsequent changeset. This is pretty risky so I will keep an eye on
this tomorrow.
Toby
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederik's message on the imports mailing list reminded me... I
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I heard back from the user - this import is described at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2010-October/000673.html
I'm following up on using smarter-sort.py for subsequent work, as well as
using a separate
I would put splitting cardinal directions out into their own tag on
the same level as breaking them out on streets. I'm sure some people
do it (in fact I seem to recall a discussion about that a few months
ago?) but I don't plan on making it a priority for myself any time
soon.
The one address
Some of his combinations seem to be mostly harmless except to tiger
tags. For example I see at least one where he combined two ways that
crossed a county line so the tiger:county tag is doubled up. But yeah
several are definitely bad and end up with things like lanes=2;3;4
Wonder if this is
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
highway=service, access=no
I haven't added any myself but when I have come across some that were
in TIGER data (imported as residential or somesuch nonsense) this is
how I have retagged them.
Toby
So I just noticed that this was never sent to talk-us. Some of you
have probably already seen it but for those who haven't:
http://opengeodata.org/big-baseball-project-2011
It is an easy thing for new users to do. I got someone to sign up with
OSM to add some fields in the Kansas City area. And
So NE2 just did a bunch of work on Kansas highway relations.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NE2/edits
Some of it was ok but he also removed the name=* tag from the
60-something relations I have already done. I know that the name tag
isn't really needed for some of these relations but it is a
Well this may not be ideal but there were already some conflicts
creeping in so I decided to pull local rank and revert since by
tomorrow night there would probably be a lot more conflicts.
Sorry for undoing what I'm sure was a good chunk of work but
unilaterally retagging other peoples work on a
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I see I have some new enemies, and the old ones are coming back to slander
me.
The fact that you keep making new enemies might be something to stop
and think about. And for the record, I'm not really an enemy... I do
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/2011 10:40 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2011-March/005466.html
I
might add
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Alexander Roalter alexan...@roalter.it wrote:
I'll be pushing Michigan back for a bit and continue westwards of Iowa.
FYI I've already relationalized the counties in most states west of
Iowa. The first few I did I did not combine with the state boundaries
though.
I noticed the Arkansas import[1] in Bentonville as I was driving
through. When I went back and added a few things along the way it
seemed to be of pretty good quality although I didn't look at it too
closely.
As wary as I am of imports, I do think addresses are one of the things
that CAN actually
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Which brings me to the conclusion that there's no point in importing
TIGER address information. A geocoder can simply try to find the
address in OSM, and fall back to TIGER if the address isn't in OSM.
Then, once the lat/lon is
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:14:03 -0600
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
But let's discuss: are
address imports useful (I say yes, for geocoding and routing they're
indispensable), necessary (I say yes, potential
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:33 AM, CrystalWalrein closed...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Golf Geek golfgeek2...@hotmail.com wrote:
After reviewing the Import/Guidelines wiki, I realize I should have posted
here first, but here's a quick after action report on a recent import.
Better late than never. :)
Why didn't you read this before the import?
://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43332671
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/42280171
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/98180901
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/129025203
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/126614718
Toby
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
the difference in speed between the HOV lane and general
access is frequently in excess of 60 MPH during peak traffic periods
in sections where the HOV lane is isolated.
Which brings up another point that the speed
So it looks like I'll be spending a few days before the new year in
Richardson. Anyone in the Dallas area who wants to get together for a
beer or something? When I looked for a mapping event on meetup.com
in the Dallas area I got back, among other things, Starting Over:
Divorce Recovery soo... not
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, it is interesting (to say the least) that hte TIGER 2011 data appears
to have address info in it for all roads.
Once the licence change is complete and our dat is stable then this must be
of considerable
I actually contacted this person a while ago and kind of forgot to
follow up. I suggested putting the store number in the ref tag. Part
of his response:
Hi, I am a Vons employe and as apart of my training we have been told
to call all stores as by their proper name like in Brea (the store I
work
Thanks for sharing the details. I have done some limited mapping based
on TIGER 2010 and 2011 data. But so far I've done it by hand. Drawing
ways from bing and then copying the name from TIGER. This works for
the few small neighborhoods I've done it with but assuming no one has
any improvements to
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 1/13/2012 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* Remap data that remains at risk of being removed, following the
guidelines on the wiki (see links below).
1 - 100 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
