Hello ETM,
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:42:42 -0400 GMT (02/06/2004, 06:42 +0700 GMT),
ETM wrote:
E Marck, would you please give me a sample cut mark (template?
E macro?) for my signature for use only when replying to this
E list since all my other mailing lists use top posting and
E therefore a cut
Hi Allen,
Tuesday, June 1, 2004, 7:37:29 AM, you wrote:
A Even if all that is irrelevant, there is some value in a strictly inforced
A 'my way or the highway' approach--if there were conditions on when top
A posting was and was not accepted, it would be near impossible to enforce
A any
unacceptable and assumes that all readers thread their messages. This
AM actually annoys me more than top posting does.
Same here. Even with threaded view: There may be subthreads, so I have
read a couple of other messages before I get to the one I'm reading.
No quoting at all, I would have to scroll up
Peter Meyns wrote:
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
I'm copying this over to TBOT to move discussion there.
I'm curious about the logic of the above point from Peter's tag line
(which I agree with) and applying the same logic
electronically
since we can easily insert text between segments of the original and
easily specially mark the original to differentiate it from the reply
text. In this way, context is better gleaned and followed. Why restrict
ourselves by top posting since this is the format we use with snail
Hi ken,
On Mon, 31 May 2004, at 11:05:24 [GMT -0500] (which was 10:05 AM where
I live) you wrote:
kg I'm curious about the logic of the above point from Peter's tag
kg line (which I agree with) and applying the same logic to message
kg list view.
On folders where I view threads (mainly lists),
arguing against the list rule of top-posting at
all. I was asking whether staunch anti-top-posters always viewed
their messages lists with new messages at the bottom.
I only threw in the comment at the end about the physical Inbox
because it was a different way of doing things - not as an argument
Hello Ken,
Monday, May 31, 2004, 6:05:24 PM, you wrote:
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
kg It would seem that if logical flow of conversation is a main
kg argument for top-posting, a similar argument could be used for viewing
kg
of
C recursive top-posting or however you might want to call it.
Moving to TBOT
And can you imagine the enormous overhead a server would have if it
had to parse each and every message to determine where to stick its
hop information instead of just sticking it on top.
Sometimes top posting
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
kg I'm curious about the logic of the above point from Peter's tag line
kg (which I agree with) and applying the same logic to message list view.
kg Do the anti-top-posting crusaders (or even those
Hi Wayne,
On Mon, 31 May 2004, at 21:54:21 [GMT -0600] (which was 9:54 PM where
I live) you wrote:
WK In the latter case, it very much annoys me to have to scroll down
WK past the quoted text to read the response. One especially annoying
WK example was a message in this list that I just read. I
On Monday, May 31, 2004, 6:33:23 AM, you wrote:
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because
Got it. (blush
Hi,
On Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 7:16:27 PM, Cyrille wrote:
LLM En fait, ce qu'on te reproche, c'est de répondre « au-dessus » des
LLM citations. Tu fais ça :
LLM Alors qu'il faut faire ça :
LLM C'est mieux expliqué dans le lien que je t'ai donné plus haut.
Oh, that's nice. Does this list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 9:36:09 PM
Subject: Mod: Top posting (was: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...)
LG Hi WilWilWil,
LG On Tue, 25 May 2004, at 21:33:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:33 PM where
LG I live) you wrote:
W It is the only one filter...
LG moderator
LG Note
Allie Martin wrote:
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Microsoft made a grand mistake. When you reply to an email using one
of their email programs, you get the flashing cursor at the top of
the text. So it appears that it's okay to just type what you want to
say *there*.
It's not okay though.
I don't
Hi,
On Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 5:49:00 PM, WilWilWil wrote:
I apologize if I do not respect rules. You explain these rules but I am French
and I've a lot of difficulties to understand what was wrong in my post and what
you explain to me.
You can have a look at
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 9:49:00 AM, you wrote:
WilWilWil I apologize if I do not respect rules. You explain these
WilWilWil rules but I am French and I've a lot of difficulties to
WilWilWil understand what was wrong in my post and what you explain
WilWilWil to me.
No problem.
On Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 18:19:52, Allie Martin wrote:
I don't know if it's Microsoft that started it but it's certainly not
only Microsoft e-mail clients that does this.
Actually, just putting the cursor at the top, is not such a bad thing (I
modified my TB templates to do this) - it's
Hello Ludovic,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 6:28:48 PM, you wrote:
LLM En fait, ce qu'on te reproche, c'est de répondre « au-dessus » des
LLM citations. Tu fais ça :
LLM Alors qu'il faut faire ça :
LLM C'est mieux expliqué dans le lien que je t'ai donné plus haut.
Oh, that's nice. Does this list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 11:23:24 AM, Pete Holsberg wrote:
Microsoft made a grand mistake. When you reply to an email using one
of their email programs, you get the flashing cursor at the top of
the text. [...]
I don't know if it's
Hi Marck,
Saturday, April 17, 2004, 7:43:26 PM, you wrote:
MDP This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
MDP Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
MDP message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
MDP encouraged and we actually request
Dear Daveiw,
@17-Apr-2004, 19:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [D] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
MDP Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
MDP message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
MDP
Hi Marck,
Thank you for reminding me of the rules. I somewhat forgot
them...nearly 2 years since I last posted here.
Apologies to all forum members.
--
Best regards,
jlaikan
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
LG Top posting, i.e., typing ...[snip]
LG Thank you.
LG /moderator
Now, I am not 'sucking up to the moderators!...but the way the mods
pull us back into line is one of the good things about this list
ie as far as I have seen
S J Love, [SJL] wrote:
SJL The mods on this list are refreshingly different.!
Thanks for your encouragement. We do work hard to please, and feel a
sense of satisfaction when we see comments like yours. :) What you've
seen is our exact intent!
Have a good one. :)
--
-= allie_M =- | List
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote:
Hello Jack,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote:
JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too.
Thanks... grin
JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100%
JM happy, but you're getting close enough for
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:25:03 PM, you wrote:
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote:
Hello Jack,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote:
JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too.
Thanks... grin
JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make
Hi Jack,
on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500GMT (01.10.03, 22:25 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JM Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:57:11 +0100
JM Received: from .
JM . for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:50:29 -0800
JM Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500
Friday, January 9, 2004, 3:13:54 PM, you wrote:
Hi Jack,
on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500GMT (01.10.03, 22:25 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JM Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:57:11 +0100
JM Received: from .
JM . for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan 2004
to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Mark.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Mark.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your message
and following it with all quoted text below, is not encouraged and we
actually request that you not do so
Hello Marck,
Thursday, November 13, 2003, 4:27:04 AM, you wrote:
MDP Hi Mark,
MDP @13-Nov-2003, 03:54 -0700 (13-Nov 10:54 UK time) Mark Thomas said to
MDP Terry:
I have the template installed in the new template section. Using
The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
MDP moderator
MDP
Hi Mark,
@13-Nov-2003, 04:37 -0700 (13-Nov 11:37 UK time) Mark Thomas said to
Marck:
MDP .. Please don't feel singled out Mark.
No problem. I take it constructively. It's been a long day!
Thanks for that! Apologies for the double whammy too. Looks like
Allie and I are both on and in
Hello Marck,
Thursday, November 13, 2003, 5:20:59 AM, you wrote:
MDP Hi Mark,
MDP @13-Nov-2003, 04:37 -0700 (13-Nov 11:37 UK time) Mark Thomas said to
MDP Marck:
MDP .. Please don't feel singled out Mark.
No problem. I take it constructively. It's been a long day!
MDP Thanks for that!
if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out David.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request
...
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Laura.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Eddie.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 02:16:02 +0100 GMT (9/30/2003, 6:16 PM +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
snip
MDP The third explanation is that we're just a bunch power hungry
MDP megalomaniacs who love to see our admonishments hurled around the
MDP planet in the form of irate electrons.
Hello Leif,
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:10:41 -0600 GMT (10/1/2003, 7:10 AM +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
snip
LG Alas, what Marck said also is most true... We just like to hear
LG ourselves talk. ;-)
And so we return to JFW. :)
--
Best regards,
Dennis
- HCI: Helping Criminals,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
BB The problem with lists is that when people see something done
BB wrong and no correction is issued on the list, the lesson learned
BB is that the inappropriate behavior is correct and
Why these repetitve instructions?!?
Maybe some of us need to be reminded about the list rules constantly.
For example, the message about inserting a sig delimiter doesnt seem
to have reached you yet :(
--
regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 2.00.18
Hello Clive,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 12:28:29 AM, you wrote:
CT Maybe some of us need to be reminded about the list rules
CT constantly. For example, the message about inserting a sig
CT delimiter doesnt seem to have reached you yet :(
*Exactly* the point! There are boatloads of lurkers on
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:10:41 AM, you wrote:
[]
I've had this same conversation with Yuki off-list. Marck, Allie and I
have been moderating the TB lists for ages now. We've just about tried
every form and fashion of moderation known to mankind, and we stick
with what works for us over
Hallo Jack,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JM I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually
JM need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the prototype on
JM how to run one efficiently.
Okay, admit
Hello Jack,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote:
JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too.
Thanks... grin
JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100%
JM happy, but you're getting close enough for government work.
Since I work for the gov't that
At 3:52 PM on 10/1/2003, Melissa Reese typed ...
M By the way...shouldn't this thread be moved to TBOT? ;-)
No thread praising the administrators should moved anywhere.
--
Bill Blinn Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - 10/1/2003 at 4:20 PM
Technology Editor, Newsradio 610 WTVN, Columbus,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:43:24 PM, you wrote:
Hallo Jack,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JM I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually
JM need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the
Hello Melissa,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:52:30 PM, you wrote:
MR When it comes to typing, some of us are all thumbs...so I'll add
MR my extra thumbs to yours! :-)
MR By the way...shouldn't this thread be moved to TBOT? ;-)
True enough
Not that I think anybody would like to move to
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote:
JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100%
JM happy, but you're getting close enough for government work.
Since I work for the gov't that makes it just fine! ;-)
I should probably quit while I'm ahead, eh? :)
--
Best
This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this
on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain
threading.)
Point taken - but to those who don't follow TBOT, I'd like to say:
Please spank me no more! Weeeny! I am a repentant! Have Mercy! :)
--
Hello St,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 3:05:47 PM, you wrote:
SMN Point taken - but to those who don't follow TBOT, I'd like to
SMN say: Please spank me no more! Weeeny! I am a repentant! Have
SMN Mercy! :)
Sorry, gotta do it one more time... The sig delimiter is:
dash dash space
It looks
don't feel singled out Pranav.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because
Why is it that each time someone violated the list rules regarding top
posting then the rest of us are punished with that extra error message
that apparently was meant for mr. Don T. Feelsingledout?!?
Why these repetitve instructions?!?
/ St
At 8:38 PM on 9/30/2003, the otherwise nameless St at Musaic.Net
typed ...
S Why these repetitve instructions?!?
I do not speak for the list owners of this list, but I think I
understand where they're coming from. As a list owner, there is one
thing I never, ever, do -- and that is question
Hi Bill,
@30-Sep-2003, 20:48 -0400 (01-Oct 01:48 UK time) Bill Blinn
Technology Editor [BB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said to St:
BB The problem with lists is that when people see something done
BB wrong and no correction is issued on the list, the lesson
BB learned is that the inappropriate
this reply. Please don't feel singled out Paul.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your message
and following it with all quoted text below, is not encouraged and we
actually request that you not do so on this list
don't feel singled out Pranav.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because
have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Olena.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:41:03 PM, you wrote:
MDP Hi Olena,
MDP This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
MDP Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
MDP message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
MDP encouraged and we
to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Alexander.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following
04.09.2003, U wrote:
Hi Alexander,
@4-Sep-2003, 12:42 +0600 (07:42 UK time) Alexander A. Gomanyuk [AAG]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Alexander:
AAG more details... everything works fine ONLY between TB2 and TB2
AAG but makes BUG if sending on TB1 or OE
[skiped]
... and the answer is -
Hi Alexander,
@4-Sep-2003, 17:18 +0600 (12:18 UK time) Alexander A. Gomanyuk [AAG]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... and the answer is - it's not a bug. It's the inability of v1
and OE to comprehend PGP/MIME. ...
... snip
AAG How i can make, that PGP/MIME to be off by default
to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out David.
This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below
regarding top posting.
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your message
and following it with all quoted text below, is not encouraged and we
actually request that you not do so on this list because
a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the top
Hello Kevin,
Thursday, July 3, 2003, 11:01:06 PM, you wrote:
KC In Bat groups like this, including the mid:; line helps if
KC someone didn't see the original post and wants to read it in its
KC entirety.
For the, err, fanatics of TB like us who do keep all the messages, I
totally agree with the
top posting with full quote makes
sense, but I am now on an academic mailing list where top posting is
the rule. Not only that, most replies come in by PM, people offer help
and mean this personally. What follows is a conversation ruled by top
posting.
It is a very low-traffic mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leif,
On Monday, July 07, 2003 at 08:18 GMT -0600, Leif Gregory [LG] wrote
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
KC In Bat groups like this, including the mid:; line helps ...
LG For the, err, fanatics of TB like us who do keep all the messages,
LG I
Hallo Kenneth,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:36:30 -0400GMT (3-7-03, 23:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
KSR I have to say in this situation, I definitely prefer top posting
KSR over bottom posting
I'd prefer trimming quotes above top posting. I might be generalizing,
but I've never received a top
Hello Roelof,
,- [ ]
| Yes
| 2
| Tomorrow
|
| Followed by a fully quoted message containing three questions.
`-
And to be honest that sucks.
I get many of those everyday, most of my work related e-mail. As I have
said before on this list, that is very common in business
ON Friday, July 4, 2003, 11:12:37 AM, you wrote:
RO I'd prefer trimming quotes above top posting. I might be generalizing,
RO but I've never received a top posted message with trimmed quotes. What
RO I receive on a regular base are messages like this:
RO ,- [ ]
RO | Yes
RO | 2
RO | Tomorrow
For business email I top post simply because I fear people won't read
everything I've written otherwise!
Doug
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello MAU,
I get many of those everyday,
And I forgot to say that I do send them too :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Roelof,
Friday, July 4, 2003, 5:12:37 AM, you wrote:
RO I'd prefer trimming quotes above top posting. I might be generalizing,
RO but I've never received a top posted message with trimmed quotes. What
RO I receive on a regular base are messages like this:
RO ,- [ ]
RO | Yes
RO | 2
RO
* Kenneth S. Rhee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ some strange people seem to prefer top postings ]
This has to do with a group of us who also access our e-mails
using cell phones or smart phones (CDMA or GPRS). I as a general
rule, do not download the full message but first 5 to 10 lines or
a
04-Jul-2003 07:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You couldn't separate me from my Palm
...just imagine all the blood spilling around!
SCNR
--
Best regards,
neurowerx (http://www.neurowerx.de)
Freedom is not an essential and basic condition for the growth of science;
the care and diligence of
Hello Carsten,
Friday, July 4, 2003, 8:39:09 AM, you wrote:
CT If you want to communicate and don't have enough bandwidth ...
CT --/.-/-.--/-.../. -.--/---/..- ...//---/..-/.-../-.. -/.-./-.--
CT .../---/--/. -././.-- ---/.-../-.. -/.-./.-/-./.../..-././.-.
CT
Hello Wayne, you wrote:
You couldn't separate me from my Palm, but I never saw an advantage of
using it for email. I use it for about everything else though!
What kind of stuff do you use it for?
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Hello Kenneth,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 01:22:53 -0400 GMT (04/07/03, 12:22 +0700 GMT),
Kenneth S. Rhee wrote:
I think we are getting off topic here, and I'll stop here.
ACK. My reply is on TBOT.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
The trouble with doing
* Kenneth S. Rhee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Carsten, Friday, July 4, 2003, 8:39:09 AM, you wrote:
If you want to communicate and don't have enough bandwidth ...
--/.-/-.--/-.../. -.--/---/..- ...//---/..-/.-../-.. -/.-./-.--
.../---/--/. -././.-- ---/.-../-..
Hello Carsten,
Friday, July 4, 2003, 2:16:10 PM, you wrote:
CT Don't these toys give you access to a webmail application via a
CT builtin browser or can't you install a ssh client[1] on them?
CT * Can't you use IMAP? That means reading mails online and downloading
CT only those mails that
On Friday, 4 July 2003, at 9:36:30 a.m., Kenneth S. Rhee wrote:
...discussion on top versus bottom (or strategic) posting.
... e-mails using cell phones or smart phones...
Aren't we missing the point here? The discussion was regarding *this*
mailing list. Given that TB! is not available on
in this situation, I definitely prefer top posting over
bottom posting (or I appreciate people who use top posting), and that seems to be a
consensus in that group.
Perhaps as more of us migrate over to such technology, perhaps the
guideline might needs to be modified somewhat or we cannot frown
Hello Kenneth,
Thursday, July 3, 2003, 3:36:30 PM, you wrote:
KSR Perhaps as more of us migrate over to such technology, perhaps
KSR the guideline might needs to be modified somewhat or we cannot
KSR frown on others who might prefer top posting over bottom posting.
Or better yet... If people
Hello Leif,
Thursday, July 3, 2003, 5:42:19 PM, you wrote:
LG Or better yet... If people would trim their quotes.
I would second that. . .
--
Best regards,
Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62r
don't understand the
reason why.
Perhaps as more of us migrate over to such technology, perhaps the
guideline might needs to be modified somewhat or we cannot frown on
others who might prefer top posting over bottom posting.
I see your point but am amazed that you see more and more people
Hello Thomas,
Friday, July 4, 2003, 12:30:05 AM, you wrote:
TF I see your point but am amazed that you see more and more people
TF migrating *to* that technology. I would have thought it's very
TF nineties.
Actually smartphones are 21st century technology (cell + PDA). The
first popular PDA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kenneth,
On Thursday, July 03, 2003 at 17:36 GMT -0400, Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
KSR ... I definitely prefer top posting over bottom posting (or I
KSR appreciate people who use top posting), and that seems
Hello Kenneth,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:49:22 -0400 GMT (04/07/03, 11:49 +0700 GMT),
Kenneth S. Rhee wrote:
Actually smartphones are 21st century technology (cell + PDA). The
first popular PDA didn't come about till 1996, and the first
combination smartphone didn't hit the market till 2000.
I
Hello Kevin,
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 1:01:06 AM, you wrote
re: Top posting:
KC Top posting or bottom posting, IMHO, wastes bandwidth and forces one
KC to hop back and forth between the new message and the old text,
KC sometimes repeatedly, to follow the writer's train of thought
Hello Thomas,
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 1:06:15 AM, you wrote
re: Top posting:
TF I have friends in both Europe and Asia who used PDAs. In the
TF beginning, they were in love with their news toys, but each and every
TF one of them has thrown them into a corner after an average of 2 years
TF
Hello Thomas,
Friday, July 4, 2003, 1:06:15 AM, you wrote:
TF Yes, I have seen one guy recentlywith what looked like a very huge
TF mobile phone with which he could also do other things. Looked bulky
TF and uncomfortable to me. Also, I fail to see why someone needs to be
TF reachable by email
Hello Barry2,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:04:55 +0100 GMT (22/10/02, 00:04 +0700 GMT),
Barry2 wrote:
Question - would that make TB! the virus writer's target of choice
too... ??
I don't think so, because TB just doesn't have the makret share to
give enough fun to the virus-writers.
But then
Hello Anne,
Monday, October 21, 2002, 3:44:24 AM, you wrote:
A Additionally, step-by-step instructions for setting up the basic
A parts of the program would be good - e.g. we did one for setting up
A the mail dispatcher which has been sent to various TB new users as
A a guide to how to make it
know how to manage the re-send, after I figured out what I'd
done, so I set it up again in Reply.
Below is the answer I sent you:
MB Hi, Walt,
WN Re your message: Removing top posting--how?
WN On Friday, October 18, 2002 at 21:21:41, Mary Bull said, more or less, the
following:
MB ...I am
Saturday, October 19, 2002, 8:15:23 PM,myob wrote:
m Hello Scott,
m Saturday, October 19, 2002, 8:10:39 PM, you wrote:
SM How about this: we sit down and agree on a set of templates, etc.,
SM that should be offered to newbies
m which appeals to this newbie.
An excellent suggstion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anne,
21-Oct-2002, 04:29 Anne [A] in
mid:92139992380.20021021042920;gmx.co.uk said:
A Yes please Marck - that'd be very useful. Shall I mail you the
A dispatcher one offlist to have a look through?
Please.
A (BTW I can never get your sig to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anne,
21-Oct-2002, 03:44 Anne [A] in
mid:130137295700.20021021034424;gmx.co.uk said:
A Additionally, step-by-step instructions for setting up the basic
A parts of the program would be good - e.g. we did one for setting
A up the mail dispatcher
Hello Leif
LG Next time though, you'll get the trout!
Another term to puzzle a newbie! Although I've been using TB! for well
over a year I've no idea of the origin of this piscatorial reference.
--
Regards
William
Flying with The Bat! 1.61 www.ritlabs.com/the_bat
Windows 2000 Pro 2195
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi William,
19-Oct-2002, 09:06 William Moore [WM] in
mid:953230104.20021019090620;dsl.pipex.com said:
LG Next time though, you'll get the trout!
WM Another term to puzzle a newbie! Although I've been using TB!
WM for well over a year I've no idea
Hi Leif,
Friday, October 18, 2002, 21:27 -0600 (11:27 PM here) Leif Gregory
[LG] in mid:3176395796.20021018212751;pcwize.com said to Mary Bull:
LG After you get done playing with Pegasus, come back. We'll leave
LG the light on for ya! grin
I would like to echo Leif's comments Mary. I used to
201 - 300 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
