[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Thanks Mark, I am trying to use this now. I have duitfuly tagged it $:/tags/Macro saved and reloaded in Both the key tiddler and below placed <> used other field names and ways of referencing the field name yet nothing apears. I have looked around but can not see why this would not work,

Re: [tw] Re: Search text too short - set it with a spinner

There is a compatibility table for this feature here http://caniuse.com/#feat=input-number (notes for iOS Safari - 'UI widget does not include increment/decrement buttons'. 'UI widget does not take the "step", "min" or "max" attributes into account.') On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 4:31:14 AM

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Hi Tony, I really hope we can use your experiences as a further spur to improving the documentation for Tiddlywiki. It's something the community have been aware of a long time and which we have (imo) yet to seriously address. Some measure of the difficulty we experience in this regard is in

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Here's an improved (?) version that uses the existing field value as a default: \define editnsave(field) <$vars tid="$:/temp/$(currentTiddler)$" fld= "$:/temp/$(currentTiddler)$!!$field$" fldx= "{{$:/temp/$(currentTiddler)$!!$field$}}" > $field$: <$edit-text tiddler=<> field="$field$"

[tw] Re: Search text too short

Thank you a lot, from Japan! It's a must for Kanji(Chinese) character! Example→例 How to→方法 2017年5月14日日曜日 12時50分07秒 UTC+9 Birthe C: > > Tiddler $:/config/Search/MinLength is default set to 3. > > > > Birthe > > > Den søndag den 14. maj 2017 kl. 05.32.44 UTC+2 skrev chaonuo: >> >> hi, >> >> I rely

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Mark, I am yet to test this but could it be extended as follows <> But idealy <> to prepopulate it? It is often helpful to utilise the edit of a value to display it as well so that you can save screen realestate. Regards Tony On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:12:47 AM UTC+10, Mark S.

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Arlen Please detail your usage of the set widget that would help because I ghave not yet being able to set a relaible psudo constant as what passes through is subseqently evaluated. Thanks Tony On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:02:02 PM UTC+10, Arlen Beiler wrote: > > And, since no one

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Richard, Thanks for your empathy. The best example of the first case Psudo constants is in the post above, this works for me in subtiddlers however as it returns the constant only in the form <> it is still of limited value. Lets imagin I have a value it may even be the tiddler name I have

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Thanks all for your comments, I will investigate the possibilities here, However my key point is it should be fairly trivial to find a clear solution coded in the the core and documented thoroughly in the documentation. My Key point is these basic needs are not addressed in the current

Re: [tw] Comments on an online service

Hi Arlen, If the sky is the limit: It would be great to have a service which would make it possible to transform TWs into mobile apps and deploy them in the appstores. Talking monetarisation I could imagine free apps which are paid in advance and some way to share the gain on apps which are

Re: [tw] [TW5] Table of Contents

Considering that you've just bumped a 3 year old thread, I wouldn't hold my breath. The TOC macro will use the caption field by default, and you can have more than one tiddler with the same caption. Maybe that will give you better results? Good luck, Mark On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Re request #2, use the following macro. Put it in a tiddler tagged $:/tags/Macro. Then put <> anywhere in the tiddler that you want to edit the field. This will create an edit field and a reset button. Use the * button the first time you use the field to synch it with the current values. Edit

Re: [tw] [TW5] Table of Contents

I still think anchor tags that can be used to generate a toc within a tiddler could be useful. One example where I would like to use them is in code documentation. If you generate a document for each module, you may want a section with a heading Change Log. From my experience, you can't create

[tw] Re: [TW5] Translucent Tiddlers

Thanks Eric! I was missing the 'a' in hsla when I tried it. I prefer this way to rgb(a) On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 11:08:23 PM UTC+10, Eric Shulman wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 5:50:34 AM UTC-7, RichardWilliamSmith > wrote: >> >> I'll answer my own question :) one way is to

[tw] Re: [TW5] Translucent Tiddlers

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 5:50:34 AM UTC-7, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > I'll answer my own question :) one way is to use 'rgba', like this > - rgba(52,200,52,0.2) where the last value it the alpha. Should also be > able to use 'hsl' but that doesn't seem to work (?) > The values for

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

You'll have to explain what you mean. The method I described doesn't lose focus. On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 12:28:42 AM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > > > El miércoles, 9 de agosto de 2017, 6:14:48 (UTC+2), Mark S. escribió: >> >> Adding to what Richard suggests, if you only want your

[tw] Re: [TW5] Translucent Tiddlers

I'll answer my own question :) one way is to use 'rgba', like this - rgba(52,200,52,0.2) where the last value it the alpha. Should also be able to use 'hsl' but that doesn't seem to work (?) On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:20:35 PM UTC+10, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > Hi Mat, > > What

[tw] Re: [TW5] Translucent Tiddlers

Hi Mat, What would you put it if you wanted it only 50% transparent (~translucent). It seems like 4/8 digit codes (with alpha channel in the last 1/2) are part of the css 4 spec, but don't seem to be implemented right now (?) Richard. On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:44:55 PM UTC+10, Mat

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

And, since no one mentioned it yet, the set widget is probably what you're looking for for pseudo constants. Documentation is on tiddlywiki.com. On Aug 9, 2017 07:53, "RichardWilliamSmith" wrote: > Just to add that you can go to Tiddlywiki.com and create a new

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

Just to add that you can go to Tiddlywiki.com and create a new Tiddler with the text <$edit-text field="text"/> and give it the tag $:/tags/ViewTemplate you get a live edit field that doesn't lose focus. I guess the difference between this and an edit-text widget as part of the tiddler content

[tw] Re: [TW5] Translucent Tiddlers

charleyc...@gmail.com wrote: > > Everything white being translucent. Or dark grey, in my case (custom > palette). Ok, then you can go to that custom palette and simply locate the color fields that have that dark gray color code, and exchange the color code for the word *transparent*. I think

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

The method I suggested works without losing focus when tested on Tiddlywiki.com. I just tried transcluding the body element itself ($:/core/ui/EditTemplate/body) and that works too. I do remember there being an issue with losing focus when updating the content of a tiddler, as you describe,

[tw] Re: [TW5] Translucent Tiddlers

Everything white being translucent. Or dark grey, in my case (custom palette). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw] Re: Comments on an online service

Ciao Arlen 1 - Would payment be through Amazon? IF SO, that is very *good*. Its proven resilient & pretty clear. 2 - Part of the problem you might face is that the current TYPE of user (i.e. a lot of us in this group) are cheapskates--I can't see you making money from people like us :-) 3 -

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

El miércoles, 9 de agosto de 2017, 6:14:48 (UTC+2), Mark S. escribió: > > Adding to what Richard suggests, if you only want your special fields to > appear, you can make a tiddler with $:/tags/ViewTemplate and populate it > with: > You are missing the point that you CAN NOT edit a field on