We have at leat three general patterns represented here on TT:
1. Drive-by or protest evangelism.
2. Ivory tower evangelism.
3. Mentor evangelism.
I have made my choice.
Enough said.
jd
For enquiring minds:
JD chose plan B
ZER0 Evangelism
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have at leat three general patterns represented here on TT:
1. Drive-by or protest evangelism.
2. Ivory tower evangelism.
3. Mentor evangelism.
I have made my choice.
Enough said.
jd
What's that Kevin "delusory evangelism" or one of the
three below??
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:25:50 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: For enquiring minds: JD chose plan B
ZER0 Evangelism --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have at leat three general patterns
I knew a guy that got so bothered dealing withcult members, in frustration he said "let them go to hell" He meant it and so many today might as well, since their Evagelistic efforts amount to ZER0The new increasingly popularprogram of evangelism is the HOTtest thing. Based on the Japanese
Well, I certainly think you qualify as the house pro on zero.
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I knew a guy that got so bothered dealing withcult members, in frustration he said "let them go to hell" He meant it and so many today might as
Tell us about some ofyour AMAZING sucess stories!Have you discipled any other Bishops? Who are they?I am so excited waiting for the exciting stories![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Well, I certainly think you qualify as the house pro on zero. -- Original message
I made the mistake of answering this line of questioning in detail, before. No point in doing it again.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tell us about some ofyour AMAZING sucess stories!
Have you discipled any other Bishops?
Who are they?
O that is right I remember, now.You said two door Blue[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I made the mistake of answering this line of questioning in detail, before. No point in doing it again. jd-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tell us
In the past two days, some 28 posts similar to this one in terms of content. Number 29 is only a few minutes away.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O that is right I remember, now.
You said two door Blue[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made
In a message dated 1/29/2005 6:00:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, Knpraise writes:
In a message dated 1/28/2005 12:18:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as John goes, if he wants to question the orthodoxy of the fall, I say let him do so. Who is Adam but the old man?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/29/2005 6:00:40 PM
Pacific Standard Time, Knpraise writes:
In
a message dated 1/28/2005 12:18:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as John goes, if he wants to question the orthodoxy of the fall,
I say let
Perhaps I do not
see the sin event as a tragedy. Rather, it
was and is (us all ) that which springs from unregenerate man. It was going to
happen -- BECAUSE GOD IS NOT FINISHED WITH US YET. Adam
needed the same Author and Finisher as we. It is not simply
that we share in Adam because of
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:10:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm interested in what you and others think about the fall of man being orthodox doctrine or pop theology.
No one on this forum, except you, allows for the doctrine of the "fall of man" to be "pop theology."
In a message dated 1/28/2005 12:18:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as John goes, if he wants to question the orthodoxy of the fall, I say let him do so. Who is Adam but the old man? When Christ died, we died with him -- and the old man died, too. The debt of the
Have
been pondering this. I think there is only one story. The Word of God is, and
illuminates, history--doesn't tell us all movement in time and space,
but tells us ["us" advisedly--rather than"me"] its meaning and traces its
purposeful continuity, and brackets it with eternity; history
-
Adam sinned and we share
in his sin BECAUSE we all have sinned.
JD
JD, Yes, we HAVE sinned,
which is why we need a Savior, to deliver us from the penalty and effects of
sin, and to free us from the bondage of having to continue sinning. We not longer HAVE to live in the flesh;
now we
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:28:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD, Yes, we HAVE sinned, which is why we need a Savior, to deliver us from the penalty and effects of sin, and to free us from the bondage of having to continue sinning.
You draw a distinction between past
JD, Yes, we HAVE sinned, which is why we need a Savior, to
deliver us from the penalty and effects of sin, and to free us from the bondage
of having to continue sinning.
You draw a distinction between past sins and the continual sin circumstance
when you capitalize HAVE in the
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:23
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
In a message dated 1/27/2005 8:45:22 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
David Miller wrote:What about your
perspective that therewas no fall of man
Izzy wrote:
JD you have associated yourself with your Triad friends.
And since when do the Righteous proclaim that they
sin every day?
LOL. Excellent point, Izzy. And since when do the righteous proclaim a
vulgar and profane man like Jon Stewart to be a prophetic voice into our
culture?
Izzy wrote:
The Good News is that we are now FREE
from sinning, and FREE to live in the Spirit!
Oh, what a happy thought for starting the
day!!!
Amen. Preach it sister. This is the gospel of Jesus Christ. The kingdom
of God is here!
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your
vid Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 10:09
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
Hi John. I don't have a lot of time, so my
response is in red. This is becoming much too personal, so I think we
should just drop this exchange until you are able
approximated such as this.
- Original Message -
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 26, 2005 19:26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T, You and DavidM sound irate, partic at the conservatv church-goers of
America
DAVEH: Ohhcool music, Kevin! :-)
Kevin Deegan wrote:
http://theologue.info/church_movie.htm
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email
Gary wrote:
T, You and DavidM sound irate, partic at the
conservatv church-goers of America;
Don't you think God is angry at hypocrite Christianity?
Gary wrote:
are you mad at them for sendg GWB back to the WH?
It took a lot more than conservative church-goers to retain George Bush in
So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary wrote: T, You and DavidM sound irate, partic at the conservatv church-goers of America;Don't you think God is angry at hypocrite Christianity?Gary wrote: are
David Miller wrote:
What about your perspective that there
was no fall of man in the garden?
Isn't that part of modern pop theology?
John wrote:
Why ask that question?
Because I was surprised to hear you say that there are no pop theologies in
this forum. I would consider a disbelief in
David Miller wrote:
To say that truth is unobtainable without
the voice of others is error.
John wrote:
Well then -- guess that does it for authors of the
biblical message, for the prophets, for the evangelists,
for the pastors, for the teachers, for those who are
spiritual (helping
it's on the flip side of sinless
perfection; existentially our sin is core orthodoxy as is our (actual,
existential) redemption in Christ
neither sinlessness nor sinless
perfection square with reality
ftr, existential 'reality'is unorthodox
outside of the Word of God (a commentfor
In a message dated 1/27/2005 8:23:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
Bless your heart. It is so much easier to come up with tidbits such as the above rather than fulfill the
In a message dated 1/27/2005 8:45:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Miller wrote:
What about your perspective that there
was no fall of man in the garden?
Isn't that part of modern pop theology?
John wrote:
Why ask that question?
Because I was surprised to hear you
In a message dated 1/27/2005 8:52:29 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Miller wrote:
To say that truth is unobtainable without
the voice of others is error.
John wrote:
Well then -- guess that does it for authors of the
biblical message, for the prophets, for the
Here is a tidbit for you
If the shoe fits wear it[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/27/2005 8:23:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.Bless your heart. It is so much easier to
Out of respect for my friends in the Righteous Triad (I like that more
than liberal, don't you?), I believe that I am the only one who has
fallen from the fall. It fits in with the
equation Lance, Jonathan, Billy T and poor old John
Smithson.
An so you try to force me onto the
Lets continue the "tidbit" theme for a second with "go thou and do likewise." Now that was easy enough, but equally immature. Was any good accomplished by this quoting of scritprue from your dear brother Smithson? Quoting scripture while thinking you are actually ministering the Word is the
In a message dated 1/27/2005 7:41:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD you have associated yourself with your Triad friends. And since when do the Righteous proclaim that they sin every day? Izzy
Since the very moment we were made to be righteous by the Great God Almighty.
How thoughtless of me. I need more community.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets continue the "tidbit" theme for a second with "go thou and do likewise." Now that was easy enough, but equally immature. Was any good accomplished by this quoting of scritprue from your dear brother Smithson? Quoting
In a message dated 1/27/2005 9:04:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How thoughtless of me. I need more community.
Probably not, Kevin. Sounds as though you have it all figured out.
JD
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie Sawczak
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005
10:26 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
I am realizing just how big a part the
will plays in understanding.
Debbie
-Original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/25/2005 6:34:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds good on the surface, John. It may even be true for some who are
more dependant than independant. It certainly would not apply, however, to the
shepherd
:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 26, 2005 08:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/25/2005 6:34:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds good on the surface, John. It may even
holy smoke! you and
me and Servetus'd be inseperable, T
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:50:47 -0600 Terry Clifton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
myself..a burning desire to stay as far from
hypocrites as possible.
y, January 25, 2005 10:26 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
I am realizing just how big a part the will plays in understanding.
Debbie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 20
In a message dated 1/26/2005 3:37:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, thats so true--whether or not we will to be conformed to the image of Christ (who came to set us free from sin), or whether we will to be conformed to the pop theologies of the day (invented to excuse
John wrote:
There are no pop theologies on this forum ...
What about your perspective that there was no fall of man in the garden?
Isn't that part of modern pop theology?
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
Terry wrote:
It's the pretend christians that make
me gag. Makes me want to spew
them out of my mouth.
You tell 'em, Terry. You are speaking for our Lord now. :-)
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how
John wrote:
... we need each other or God would not have
put us together. Why any would feel the need
to correct this opinion is beyond me.
Perhaps perspective makes a difference. Does our Lord want us to have the
attitude that we need each other in order to obtain truth, or the attitude
In other words--to connect
the belowwith my immediately preceding post whose thread I retitled "Word
of God"--if it is a form of "dependency" to need each other to be, and help
understand, reality, then so is needing to sleep, eat, and exercise.And
of course it works both ways--we can and
T, You and
DavidMsoundirate, partic atthe conservatv church-goers of
America; are you mad at them for sendg GWB back to the WH?
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:50:47 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||
It's the pretend christians that make me Gag.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T, You and DavidM sound irate, partic at the conservatv church-goers of
America; are you mad at them for sendg GWB back to the WH?
==
Not mad or angry, G, just disappointed. To me, the Bible is the
dead institutions and moving where He is allowed. What do you think? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
11:44 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
http://theologue.info
, 2005
2:25 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
In other words--to
connect the belowwith my immediately preceding post whose thread I
retitled Word of God--if it is a form of dependency to
need each other to be, and help understand, reality, then so is needing
G, its the pretend
category that voted against GWB. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
4:27 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
T, You
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 4:27
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
T, You and
DavidMsoundirate, partic atthe conservatv church-goers of
America; are you mad at them for
sendg GWB back
In a message dated 1/26/2005 11:08:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To say that
truth is unobtainable without the voice of others is error.
Well then -- guess that does it for authors of the biblical message, for the prophets, for the evangelists, for the pastors, for the
the teacher is
omitted?
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:50:07 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To insist on calling such "pop theology" is to insult
the teaching rather than deal with the issue,
itself.John
DeeganSent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:44 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
http://theologue.info/church_movie.htm
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
7:06 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
In a message dated 1/26/2005 11:08:59 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
8:30 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
The point is we do not go to the world to see what works there, and
then bring it in to the church.
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin, thanks for the interesting
video
In a message dated 1/26/2005 6:02:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the teacher is omitted?
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:50:07 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To insist on calling such "pop theology" is to insult the teaching rather than deal with the issue, itself.
John
A
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
9:02 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
In a message dated 1/26/2005 6:02:41 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/24/2005 5:34:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is unity prerequisite to locating *truth*, below ..what's the role of
toleration (here, on TT) ..the relationship betw unity toleration?
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005
TERRY SAYS: It certainly would not apply, however, to the shepherd boy named David who had for company only sheep, nor to John the Baptist, who lived alone in the wilderness, or to Elija, or to Paul following his experience on the Damascus road, or to John on the isle of Patmos, or to Job and many
Everyone who settles for an elementary knowledge in the Faith is reduced to a life, a spiritual life, of immaturity. But exposure to that which is beyond the elementary issues of faith and practice leads to a sensitive and well trained disciple, one who is then, and only then, able to
=
Sounds good on the surface, John. It may even be true for some who are
more dependant than independant. It certainly would not apply, however,
to the shepherd boy named David who had for company only sheep, nor to John the
Baptist, who
Mother Teresa? Did she ever really work out her faith?
Mother Teresawrote in 1958: "My smile is a great cloak that hides a multitude of pains."
MT "The damned of hell suffer eternal punishment because they experiment with the loss of God. In my own soul, I feel the terrible pain of this
Mother Teresa? Did she ever really work out her faith?
Mother Teresawrote in 1958: "My smile is a great cloak that hides a multitude of pains."
MT "The damned of hell suffer eternal punishment because they experiment with the loss of God. In my own soul, I feel the terrible pain of this
, January 25, 2005
11:07 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
Mother Teresa? Did she ever really work out her
faith?
Mother Teresawrote in 1958: My smile is a
great cloak that hides a multitude of
pains.
MT The damned of hell suffer
l the 24 hours, touching Him in His distressing disguise.
Mother Theresa
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:07 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
Mother Teresa? Did she ever r
your Father who is in heaven.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005
12:58 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
Doubt may occur but when that doubt is in the very
existance of god
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:52:38 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||
MK 6:31..*he* said unto them, Come ye
yourselves apart into a desert place, and rest
a while:..*they* had no leisure so much as to
eat.
who are you referring to--who is
'we'?
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:33:29 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
We can only
speculate ..
Those of us who are not God.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005
5:21 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Evangelism
who are
you referring to--who is 'we
In a message dated 1/24/2005 10:01:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I see. I agree with you.
You are emphasizing the corporate, and I am emphasizing the searching. I think truth is not obvious the way we would sometimes like it to be; many things are "hidden", some
In a message dated 1/24/2005 10:09:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't mention the Holy Spirit. We need him in order to find and understand the truth. But that doesn't obviate the search.
Debbie
I didn't think for a second that you had forgotten. He hides between
is this what you
mean?
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:46:43 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Those of us who are
not God...can only speculate
..
In a message dated 1/25/2005 6:34:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
Everyone who settles for an elementary knowledge in the Faith is reduced to a
life, a spiritual life, of immaturity. But exposure to that which is beyond
the elementary issues of faith and practice
This is just plain silly. The effect of what I wrote earlier is this: we need each other or God would not have put us together. Why any would feel the need to correct this opinion is beyond me. Those who resist the fellowship (read: partnership and read it with emphasis) of the saints are those
In a message dated 1/25/2005 7:59:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KD Are you talking abut the "Life Long Learning"
of the Purpose DRIVEN Church?
I have the book in my library. Never have taken the time to read it. 'Life long learning?"
In a message dated 1/25/2005 3:25:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:52:38 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
MK 6:31..*he* said unto them, Come ye yourselves apart into a desert place, and rest a while: ..*they* had no leisure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just plain silly. The effect of what I wrote earlier is this: we
need each other or God would not have put us together. Why any would feel
the need to correct this opinion is beyond me.Those who resist the
fellowship (read: partnership and read it
I am
realizing just how big a part the will plays in
understanding.
Debbie
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 8:40
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] EvangelismThis is just
plain
In a message dated 1/25/2005 8:16:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am realizing just how big a part the will plays in understanding.
Debbie
Amen.
In a message dated 1/25/2005 6:34:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds good on the surface, John. It may even be true for some who are more dependant than independant. It certainly would not apply, however, to the shepherd boy named David who had for company only sheep,
John wrote:
David, why in the world do you oppose perhaps
90% of the things I share on this forum?
My perspective is that I agree with about 90% of what you share. I would
like to agree 100% of the time. It would be nice if we could speak the same
thing and have the same mind.
John wrote:
In a message dated 1/22/2005 7:39:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Corporate agreement is often seen as "truth." If I have my hat on correctly, truth is not possible without a corporate (read: communal) searching.
[Debbie]
Someone quoted me a verse recently from which
is
unityprerequisiteto locating*truth*, below
..what's the role
oftoleration (here, on TT) ..the relationship betw unity
toleration?
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:48:51 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/22/2005 7:39:05 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/22/2005 7:39:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Corporate agreement is often seen as truth. If I have my hat on
correctly, truth is not possible without a corporate (read: communal) searching.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corporate agreement is often seen as truth. If I
have my hat on
correctly, truth is not possible without a corporate (read:
communal) searching.
The truth is not established by the opinion of the
In a message dated 1/24/2005 5:34:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is unity prerequisite to locating *truth*, below ..what's the role of toleration (here, on TT) ..the relationship betw unity toleration?
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:48:51 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a
In a message dated 1/24/2005 6:34:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The truth is not established by the opinion of the majority. Truth is determined by DNA testing.
In the search for "truth," the majority does not matter at all. Disagreement on this issue gives rises to
In a message dated 1/24/2005 8:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, Knpraise writes:
In a message dated 1/24/2005 5:34:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is unity prerequisite to locating *truth*, below ..what's the role of toleration (here, on TT) ..the relationship betw unity
Yes, I
see. I agree with you.
You
are emphasizing the corporate, and I am emphasizing the searching. I think truth
is not obvious the way we would sometimes like it to be; many things are
"hidden", some of the most glorious truths are buried like treasure,
andsearching them out is part of
I
didn't mention the Holy Spirit. We need him in order to find and understand the
truth. But that doesn't obviate the search.
Debbie
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 7:49
PMTo:
Corporate
agreement is often seen as "truth." If I have my hat on
correctly, truth is not possible without a corporate (read: communal)
searching.
[Debbie]
Someone quoted me a verse recently
from which they extracted something similar: Proverbs 25:2 "It is the glory of
God to conceal a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:33 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Evangelism
David, is there some place on the web where I can read more of this?
Terry
David
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Terry,
David got them from E-Sword. Use this link:
http://www.e-sword.net/files/setup752.exe
Then go to this page http://www.e-sword.net/extras.html and download
http://www.e-sword.net/files/extras/ante-nicene.exe.
9 volumes of the Ante-Nicene Fathers await you.
So you have settled it in your mind.
It adds nothing to your Mind.
OK - enjoy[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/20/2005 1:34:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi John.I remembered in some past post you had expressed appreciation for the church fathers. Have you
I know what F.E is, David. While we are on this subject - one which has nothing to do with Is 58 -- what churches present F.E to the exclusion of preaching or teaching the gospel?
Good Question! You are right almost all of them talk about evangelism, very few Do anything with it. Some do door to
In a message dated 1/21/2005 9:42:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know what F.E is, David. While we are on this subject - one which has nothing to do with Is 58 -- what churches present F.E to the exclusion of preaching or teaching the gospel?
Good Question! You are
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
