On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:06 +, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> This is not a new issue. Juniper issued an advisory for it back in
> August.
You can imagine why no-one jumped to upgrade, however:
"MPCs (Modular Port Concentrators) installed in an MX Series router may
crash upon receipt of very specifi
On 31/01/12 15:35, Leo Vegoda wrote:
I note that PCI DSS poses a problem for IPv6, in that section 1.3.8
(my copy is dated October 2010) mandates that private IP addresses
(they clearly mean RFC1918) are not revealed to or routable from the
internet (my paraphrasing).
Are RFC 4193 addresses not
On 08/06/12 17:44, Rob Parker wrote:
We do - IX Reach are in 10 major data centres in London and offer
connectivity between them all, and the same in other cities as well
(e.g. Manchester, Amsterdam, Frankfurt etc).
... And the service is excellent. :)
Tom
On 11/10/13 15:46, James Bensley wrote:
I was wondering if anyone can recommend a small 1-to-2u rack mount
unit that is a copper/fibre media converter for 6 or 8 connections. In
my head I can imagine a switch with half copper ports and half
SFP/SFP+ slots. Something I can drop into a central PoP.
(Apologies for the useless e-mail, I'll try again...)
On 11/10/13 15:46, James Bensley wrote:
I was wondering if anyone can recommend a small 1-to-2u rack mount
unit that is a copper/fibre media converter for 6 or 8 connections. In
my head I can imagine a switch with half copper ports and half
S
On 21/11/13 22:33, Nat Morris wrote:
> Having said that, for connections into compute nodes at 10G with
cable runs of perhaps 2m it seems a tad excessive to be putting in a
pair of optics at c.a. GBP 75 each when we're picking up the Cisco DA
cables for [I think] GBP 25 a *pair*.
Think you're b
On 21/11/13 19:29, Timothy Creswick wrote:
I guess the most important question is what failure mode are you
observing? Are the cables effectively DOA? If that's the case then it
sounds like the most prudent solution would be to test each cable
ourselves before they go into production in future.
On 24/11/13 21:40, Nat Morris wrote:
Not so, you can get one off optics at that price if you know where to
look.
Source? Surely we could all benefit from something like this? ;)
Tom
On 15/12/13 19:30, Gord Slater wrote:
ripe atlas probes allow you to do user-defined tests, trading credits
for tests, credits build up over time by having it plugged in, you can
do some pretty advanced stuff if you get clever with the system. Seems
to be used for DNS root reachability tests a l
On 30/01/14 14:25, Robin Williams wrote:
Unfortunately they're looking for native FC rather than FCoE and won't
budge (which is making life harder). As far as I can tell, OSA is about
the only option. I'm fairly used to the Ethernet offerings, but
wondered if there is any specialised products g
On 01/05/14 18:04, John Bourke wrote:
As we only have a mandate to distribute to the UK, I am thinking that I
can just peer with UK ISPs and deliver the data to their customers.
Time to peer with the bigger ISPs might be higher than you expect. Some
might not want to peer at all; it will depen
On 22/07/14 19:50, Tim Chown wrote:
http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-reaches-key-milestone-in-launch-of-ipv6-broadband-network
*1Tb/sec* of IPv6 traffic. That is quite some milestone...
Tom
On 12/08/14 11:31, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> what sort of access services are you talking about?
And why not backhaul them to your PoP in Manchester? :)
(I'm sure there's a reason, but I'm just curious as to why London's
preferable.)
Tom
On 28/08/14 08:53, James Bensley wrote:
> I couldn't find anywhere in BT documentation a statement saying you
> can't use both links simutaneously such as in a LAG but nothing that
> said you couldn't either - fear the ambiguity when it comes to all
> this BT!
BT Wholesale do have a list of approv
On 10/09/14 11:10, Will Hargrave wrote:
> Absolutely! I was pleased to see so many folks from south of the
> border too, and the interesting Ireland-related content.
Yes, this: it was great to have such an interesting & integrated meeting
of the two isles. The ION conference added another helping
On 16/09/14 13:56, Chris Russell wrote:
> IPVPN - VM version of IPClear (over 3G, Broadband, etc etc)
Including National Ethernet, too. 20Mbit lines terminated on Alcatel
NTEs *and* 3900 ISR G2s.
*grumbles at rack utilisation*
--
Tom
On 15/09/14 10:39, Donal Cunningham wrote:
> I propose a variant on Godwin's Law (I suggest "Hilliard's Law")
> which states that "As an online discussion grows longer, the
> probability of Fr. Ted being quoted approaches 1".
Motion seconded.
--
Tom
On 10/11/14 13:17, Tom Bird wrote:
> Who's the current favourite for some memory, 1 gig for a 3bxl sup, and a
> 2 gig for a 7201?
Crucial appear to cover the 7200..? (So long as it's not NPE-G2,
apparently). No luck there for the 3BXL though.
--
Tom
On 04/12/14 10:08, James Bensley wrote:
> Upon reflection, a more likely scenario is that the support engineer
> was wrong or has his facts mixed up.
"bio-directional" was the clue.
--
Tom
On 02/01/15 21:12, Michael Banks wrote:
> Have you checked PeeringDB for a contact?
Have you ever tried peering with Level3?
Thomas: ask your AM for the copy of the escalation matrix, and use it to
the letter. I've had decent success by politely asking, "Please could
you escalate this ticket". :)
On 04/01/15 09:39, Thomas Greer wrote:
> Unknown who account manager is… Trying to find that out :) Do you
> have a copy of the escalation matrix?
This is more of a formality; just ask support to escalate the ticket.
You can find out whom your AM is later (or ask support, or I can put you
in the d
On 10/04/15 12:28, Ben King wrote:
> Can anyone point me in the direction Irish providers that can provide
> layer 2 services from Ireland and hand off in London Telehouse?
I've dealt with EUNetworks for this stuff in the past. It was a pleasant
experience at the time (~4 years ago).
--
Tom
On 11/04/15 01:01, David Croft wrote:
> Perhaps if you hadn't hijacked this thread immediately into a tedious
> sales pitch, this wouldn't have become an equally tedious pissing match
> about the pros and cons of different resilience mechanisms. The very
> fact that you've sent 50% of the messages
On 11/04/15 19:37, Tom Hill wrote:
> I shall echo the sentiments above, Rod. The tangential arguments that
> you have frequently "contributed" to various threads in recent times are
> rarely helpful or constructive.
>
> If it were the first time I wouldn't mi
On 11/04/15 20:50, Chris Russell wrote:
> Can I remind the list at this point of the UKNOF Respect Policy -
> available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.uknof.org.uk/Respect_at_UKNOF
>
> If you feel an individual is not adhering to the respect policy,
> please approach a UKNOF Committee member at an
On 2015-04-13 13:52, Simon Green wrote:
We're just about to go out to try and acquire some more address space.
I'm wondering if anyone on the list knows what the going rate is and
what I should expect when I start looking around?
You probably can't go far wrong firing off some emails to the ve
On 15/04/15 19:31, Lou Ashtonhurst wrote:
> If you'd like to come along, please let me know by Friday morning and
> I'll get somewhere booked.
Count me in :)
--
Tom
On 04/06/15 23:26, Robin Williams wrote:
>
> I've seen it happen in some exchange areas - previously EO lines, new
> PCPs dropped outside the exchange (along with an FTTC cab) and the EO
> lines pulled back to the cabinet. Seems to be a way around the ANFP not
> allowing VDSL directly from the ex
On 07/09/15 15:27, Robin Williams wrote:
> Of course, it may just be us that doesn't like it :)
Oh, of course not:
http://www.revk.uk/2013/12/wires-only-fttc.html
http://www.revk.uk/2014/10/bt-losing-plot-on-fttc.html
I did just wonder if it's worth the time of a few of the
smaller ISPs to g
On 09/09/15 22:37, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
> This is a game you can't win, best not play it with them
In principle, I agree on the fact that Openreach are reducing the
service that existed - and was improved upon - when FTTC was first
introduced. I also empathise with anyone that has to deal wi
On 09/09/15 23:37, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> And if you did this, could you force BT Openreach to accept a change
> of demarc to the ether socket on the modem rather than the phone
> master socket, because you're using equipment they have fully tested
> and approved of?
I was thinking more along the
On 10/09/15 00:03, Dave Bell wrote:
> With ADSL a lot of faults got passed back to the CP with a message
> along the lines of "fault not on our network, its on the customers
> network". They would then threaten with a charge (£150?) to send an
> engineer out to go look at the fault. FTTC fixed this
On 10/09/15 00:05, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>> 2. Unifying such a CPE/NTE product could also serve to provide a
>>> unified voice with which to deal with Openreach over faults
> Might be a hard battle, what % of lines aren't the big 5? How many do
> we need to have an effect?
Good point...
>>>
On 14/09/15 13:32, Robin Williams wrote:
> I'm sure there's a sound technical reason, but again, it disadvantages
> smaller CPs disproportionately who may only have a few customers on each
> switch.
I know if I were building it, I'd be avoiding switch stacking at _any_ cost.
--
Tom
On 26/10/15 11:46, Charlie Boisseau wrote:
> I’ve already tried the usual suspects; Virgin Media do have their HCS
> platform there, but it’s super expensive. SSE aren’t on-net for
> their own WDM platform.
Surf Telecom have a lot in the area, right? The NextGen website suggests
they're already d
On 02/11/15 14:31, Alistair Key wrote:
> My current supervisors hold up to 1 million routes and each have 1GB
> DRAM each for the route and switch processors.
Sounds like Cisco SUP720 3BXL? Whilst there's a bit of headroom left in
the TCAM, the 1GB RP memory they sport is beginning to look straine
On 02/11/15 22:51, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> NHR (they have a new name)
Indeed, they're now called Curvature - and to help with the transition,
everyone's tame account manager (Neil) also moved on to another business.
(I can provide contact details for his replacement off-list if anyone
needs them,
On 17/12/15 13:51, Matthew Walster wrote:
> 1. Don't use uRPF on a peering router, and if you are, loose mode seems
> pretty dumb on a full transit router.
Spoofed source, to the point where there isn't even a route for it in
the DFZ, is a thing you'll see without loose-mode URPF enabled on your
t
t hosts its Tier 3 standard data centre inside Equinix’s London
Park Royal facility."
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWj+rkAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6X7gH/0CsDm6Vg9lR0RHMvmwt
nt, but then I've never
had the luxury of having any of that. :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWj/QUAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6ck8IAI6t51ad11NZYA9AEJeTFv1e
I68Y6kfvF8BL4
ake it less annoying.
Still, RFC2544 produced some accurate results I think - it was nice
having it baked into the CPE, as it could be ran whenever we needed it. :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
On 20/01/16 17:14, Brian Candler wrote:
> Maybe that's true for mobile phone networks, who often funnel clients
> through their own NAT/proxy devices for the purposes of saving IP
> addresses and compressing content. But it's clearly not the case for
> fixed-line ISPs.
You may have forgotten that
On 20/01/16 13:01, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> How many customers will buy VPNs though? How many actually have a clue what
> DNS is?
I was quite surprised to see just how many Netflix customers have learnt
about VPNs, just by the prevalence of "hey if you run this at the same
time as watching Netflix,
ommon sense.
--
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 (0) 1904 890 890
On 20/01/16 21:18, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>> And of course, the age-old argument; criminals. The minute the
>>> Government realise that they can't see 'into' VPNs terminating
>>> in $other_country, is the minute they'll want to mitigate their
>>> use. "We're not breaking encryption, we're just blocki
more lines closer to 80Mbit.
I also wonder (as it isn't mentioned on the product page) as to
whether that 100Mbit port also supports baby jumbos, for PPPoE support
without resorting to a 1492b MTU. You'd hope so, but...
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.c
ble, I guess) :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW6+YfAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6Zy8IAIM4QnUCE/bYhctIIZaoHqeg
mI6J7e7o7nrl/daNp2GWYvSTfv0DLXZrl1pQ5/GLNqs105/uniRu1TI4Vifh
speak to at those.
(The Geo people I knew left when Zayo took over...)
--
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 (0) 1904 890 890
068748181/permalink/10153614073363182/
... But you might be too late for it. Perhaps there'll be a
second-string pick-up group (not me though!)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
er with you.)
Also, please do join Peering DB. You don't have to be at a public
exchange to this any more! :)
All the best,
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEB
is likely yet to change
further).
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXK4pyAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6lbIIAL4Qr3c54Dla5nY/T6lN9wWW
3EMQ0W2wmNy9by5GncpB4wShiabIiDAEOD7BgYh28eQj6ZfvSItBhjw2wiU
) interconnection.
Based on what you've said above, I'd hazard a guess that this is now
the "official" method. It's a shame, but it's not entirely surprising
at this point.
Prerequisite reading:
http://www.libertyglobal.com/oo-bs-ip-interconnection-portfolio.html
;t have any racks and/or power,
but they recently converted a very large suite (3A I believe) to
shared colo space. Lots of shiny new Rital racks therein, and "about
4kW" was mentioned as the upper power limit.
YMMV :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark
over the last 12 months, most recently at
LINX, and prior to that UKNOF in London if I recall correctly.
See: http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ for more figures. :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP
here they running IPv6-only here on this LAN? Surely
dual-stack wouldn't have been an issue with regards to AWS?
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
ces go, easier
> without than with.
I think it's the lack of external IPv6 that makes their decision to
use IPv6-only internally a pretty weird idea in the first place.
Whilst I'm glad someone's tried it, it's not overly representative of
the dual-stack environment that Sky is r
oved much in this area.
There were definitely better options back in 2012 - even OpenBSD
would've done a better job, where feature parity is concerned anyway.
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
ures that indicate far more traffic by
volume to these sites - and with IPv4 in decline.
It also speaks to what Neil's said elsewhere in the thread; use of
IPv6 doesn't yet remove your requirement for IPv4, and thus extending
v4's life (eg. CGN) and implementing IPv6 are concurrent
over 36 months
5) With the exception of INEX, all the prices used are publicly available
6) The average utilization of an IXP port is 40%
[1] http://mailman.nlnog.net/pipermail/nlnog/2016-May/002593.html
[2] https://www.peeringforum.com/the-real-cost-of-public-ixps
- --
Tom Hill
-BEGI
unk of the industry seems to be converging on YANG for
automation of network hardware, so that might be your best bet.
(I am *not* an expert on this subject matter; I will defer to someone
that's actually used it and tells us that it's rubbish...)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark
; inline PGP messages. I've turned that off for now and will see what
> everything makes of it now.
*moo*
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXVtXXAAoJEH2fK
more likely to be aware of the correct incantations to use when
dealing with VM.
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXWpP9AAoJEH2fKbrp2s
hurt by this, learns from this and pre-empts the
streaming of major sporting events in the future.
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXZAiJAAoJE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/06/16 16:20, Martin J. Levy wrote:
> So ... what is your ASN? Inquiring minds want to know.
letmepeeringdbthatforyou.com should really exist. ;D
-> https://www.peeringdb.com/net/8027
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hostin
and forever. Particularly football World/Euro Cups, and the Olympics
.
Talking of which, Rio 2016 starts in August... :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXZBiXAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ68T
evening will start with some short presentations (~10 mins each)
to hopefully break the ice and stimulate some conversation, followed by
plenty of time thereafter to network with your fellow attendees.
Some of the presentations confirmed thus far are:
* An Overview of Internet Peering in Europ
On 20/06/16 00:39, Tom Hill wrote:
> it is hoped that we will be able to run this every third Thursday of
> the month.
Second Thursday, *second* Thursday of the month.
It's like I don't even proof read... :)
--
Tom
Mcr and UKNOF. :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Engineer
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXaB7aAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6Dx8H/2n9HygAuwcQPG6whO1IoXsf
6p+SWDW/IfxI8T5PJMG/hcHKLsZNlfa+hNNqNd/sLIGHYI9wKyZsEPBe6KycSyI7
izzKDbt
back up again now, so these are
> supposedly all residual problems caused by the initial power loss.
Did you mean Telehouse, rather than Telec^WEquinix?
- --
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN P
Hello UKNOF,
Following on from the great success of NetMcr's inaugural event, which
was very well attended by the community, we're rolling on with our 2nd
event as planned.
When: Thursday 11th August, 2016
Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the bar upstairs)
Time: 19:00 - ~21:30 (the
bout some
> Rackspace without any luck.
Sure, I'll respond off list. :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXqdrlAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6ofAIAIeIQZR
boxes.
But not if you're running Typhoon. :)
- --
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXtFnNAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6d8YIAMK6W57tyVf
tion of Ethernet begets a new
generation of MMF.
Wouldn't it be better if we didn't have multi-mode standards any more?
- --
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX
Right, now that I've got your attention...
Would anyone be interested in popping along to the Auchentoshan
distillery, North West of Glasgow?
Google maps: https://goo.gl/maps/cT6QsPpBDKT2
Disclaimer: I'm not organising anything, nor sponsoring it, but if
anyone fancies a few wee drams we can p
Hello UKNOF,
For those of you in & around Manchester and *not* attending UKNOF next
week, NetMcr will be running on the 2nd Thursday as normal:
When: Thursday 8th September, 2016
Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the bar upstairs)
Time: 19:00 - ~21:30 (the venue stays open until mid
Hello UKNOF,
As is now tradition, NetMcr will be on the 2nd Thursday again!
When: Thursday 13th October, 2016
Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the bar upstairs)
Time: 19:00 - ~21:30 (the venue stays open until midnight)
Cost: Nil
We're aiming to provide a regular, friendl
On 24/10/16 23:11, Tom Bird wrote:
> I've got some Cisco 3502i access points which are running an up to date
> standalone image, and I've given them all IPv6 only addresses for
> management as they are a purely layer 2 device and shouldn't need a v4
> address so why bother.
My experience with this
On 29/10/16 23:14, Chris Russell wrote:
> That's been true for quite a while ... Cisco datasheets I now treat as
> more a generic "might" over "will" guide, plus there is often confusing
> terminology.
I was really just referring to IPv6/IPv4 feature parity, tbf.
But, I'm sure there are countless
Hello UKNOF,
As is now tradition, NetMcr will be on the 2nd Thursday again!
When: Thursday 10th October, 2016
Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the bar upstairs)
Time: 19:00 - 22:00 (the venue stays open until midnight)
Cost: Nil
We're aiming to provide a regular, friendly
On 01/11/16 01:50, Tom Hill wrote:
>When: Thursday 10th October, 2016
> Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the bar upstairs)
>Time: 19:00 - 22:00 (the venue stays open until midnight)
>Cost: Nil
Oopsie, that should be Thursday 10th of November 2016, as per
On 07/11/16 19:43, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> Come on TalkTalk!! It's just you guys left!! What's the date?!
Out of interest, what sort of coverage is BT up to now? You're aiming
for full availability by the end of April 2017, right?
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Byt
ess of course it's just me that the peering team don't like - in
which case I'd be happy to bake the prerequisite IPv6 peering cake. :)
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 (0) 1904 890 890
stands - it's great for those of
us that couldn't attend in person.
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
tl;dr: NetMcr, 8th December, good social, please submit talks.
When: Thursday 8th December, 2016
Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the room upstairs)
Time: 19:00 sharp, until ~22:00 (bar open until midnight!)
Cost: Nil
We're aiming to provide a regular, friendly en
Hello,
tl;dr: NetMcr, 12th Jan, good social, please submit talks.
When: Thursday 12th January, 2016
Where: 57 Thomas Street, Manchester (the room upstairs)
Time: 19:00 sharp, until ~22:00 (bar open until midnight!)
Cost: Nil
We're aiming to provide a regular, friendly enviro
flawlessly on both
address families for the foreseeable future.
(The people on this list that also happen to be our customers are going
to be among the exceptions to this, I'd expect - so thank you all. If I
can help you add some records on a Bytemark service, please let me
know offlist
ecause - amongst
other things - most people won't (shouldn't) be on Netflix or Youtube
whilst in the meeting hall. :)
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
a very similar issue that I had with IPv6 from Easynet in
Germany, recently.
Drop me a mail offlist and we'll compare output... I got some way to
finding a responsive contact, but it's all disappeared into a black hole
as it stands; if it's related, it would be worth joining force
Hello,
tl;dr: NetMcr, TONIGHT, 9th Feb. Good social, with some clueful talks.
We're also now running our own mailing list, for announcements. Future
event announcements will be made from that list *only*, so please do
sign up to it if you are interested in attending NetMcr:
https://www.netmcr
ir stories with younger
women, their peers, the UK business community – perhaps, even, the rest
of the world – get them to apply here by Wednesday 8th February."
So it's a day late to apply, but here's hoping that they re-run it. :)
Thanks for sharing, Chris!
--
Tom
On 14/02/17 17:21, Catalin Dominte wrote:
> Tom (Hill) do you know anyone?
I do! I've a few good contacts that can help in that respect.
I'll send you a list, offlist, in case I forget anyone and they stop
talking to me. :)
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark
wn the road
towards 6DG in Studleigh? (Or Digbeth, in fact).
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/06/17 09:11, Chris Russell wrote:
> On 01/06/2017 09:00, Catalin Dominte wrote:
>> Are we past Hyper yet? Or Supersonic?
>
> I'm a fan of 'Tremendous'.
Clearly, none of you have played Unreal Tournament in a while.
'MONSTER FAST!'
--
Tom
the building. Someone commented (at the
> time) somebody “put their foot in it” – quite literally, in badly
> managed fibre alongside one of the ODFs and ripped a bunch out.
This bodes well for DFA!
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 89
On 02/06/17 15:02, James Bensley wrote:
> virtual m0n0wawll boxes per customer
m0n0wall was discontinued, and its replacement - OPNSense - is a far cry
from the lovely, lightweight release that was m0n0wall. I'm very sad to
see the end of it!
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Host
age all of my competitors to use it.)
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 14/06/17 14:54, Fernando Gont wrote:
> You can scroll down and read the whole article even without registering
Why should we read this? "FYI" doesn't quite cut it on a public mailing
list... :/
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel
filling it with quarters and halves).
But instead of speculating, generally you do find that the OP had a
specific reason to ask about the DC they did - hence there aren't a
flurry of "why that DC? Why not this DC?" responses. :)
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http
basis, are you *certain* that it isn't Openreach that are
difficult to deal with, rather than the landlords?
--
Tom Hill
Network Manager
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;
There was a long, long period where Manchester city centre was coated
with FTTC cabinets that weren't serving MDUs <100m away, and Hyperoptic
have been doing rather well connecting those buildings with something
more than ADSL2+. It's played rather well into their hands.
--
Tom H
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
