On Thursday 21 July 2005 02:34, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
I very much like the vpopmail way of compiling settings into
the program. It is a little more hassle to change your
configuration, but it really files on a heavily loaded server.
[...]
The postgresql driver need not suffer simply
versus working with MySQL. Trying to make a least
common denominator solution will simply not be efficient except
perhaps on one platform that the development is centered around.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo
to know somebody is actually using it! :) Makes me feel a
little less frustrated and hopeless. :P Let me know your thoughts
on the above ideas and inquiries.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
, and this could also be
beneficial to add to the mysql module I assume, since mysql doesn't
support either.
A quick search shows that postfix does this better, though it
doesn't appear they store very much in the DB from a glance:
http://www.postfix.org/PGSQL_README.html
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen
the password file. SMTP logins *do*, but
they are considerably more rare...
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
On Sunday 19 June 2005 19:52, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
That works, but that's not useful since none of the client logins
(pop3 or imap) update the password file. SMTP logins *do*, but
they are considerably more rare...
And many accounts exist for POP3 polling only, and the end user only
uses
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:71.113.2.184
Jun 20 04:09:16 [pop3-login] Login: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.213.206.34]
Jun 20 04:09:22 [vpopmail] vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:148.64.71.106
pop3-login and imap-login are subprocesses of dovecot.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http
On Saturday 18 June 2005 03:46, Ruslan Molbashev wrote:
Do i need to use courier-imap?
You can use any IMAP or POP3 servers you wish. Possibilities
include qmail-pop3d, dovecot, bincimap, courier-imap, and many
others.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED
,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:13, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
How did you log in? SMTP-AUTH using CRAM-MD5?
PLAIN with IMAP (dovecot).
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc
On Saturday 18 June 2005 14:32, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Casey was talking about mysql not .cdb for user databases.
I certainly was not! I do not wish to use mysql, though I do want
to start using postgresql soon.
I will try rm'ing the cdb.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http
into vpasswd if
everything is OK, it just updates clear text password in there if
it fails to find one in .cdb file.
I rm'd the cdb so that it was rebuilt: this did not help.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ
wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
Any advice, please?
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell
of the
vpasswd files (and then remove the corresponding vpasswd.cdb
files).
On Gentoo:
# echo 'net-mail/vpopmail clearpasswd' /etc/portage/package.use
# emerge -uDva --newuse net-mail/vpopmail
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo
with the -r13 (stable) build, but nothing major.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
On Friday 17 June 2005 13:43, Bruno Negro wrote:
a.. CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT: checks if the SENDER of each message
has the username part matching [a-z0-9_-]
No .??? We have many users who opt for addresses like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL
though - you should have used
vadduser, which would have done this all for you.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
it is
for people to type a trailing dot on email addresses, but I do it
all the time (and on this message too, just to prove a point).
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http
On Friday 17 June 2005 19:56, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 15:47, Bruno Negro wrote:
Documentation is wrong (I'll correct it soon): '.' and '='
are accepted in format controls.
Sorry I didn't read this message before my last reply asking
about this...
Guys
On Friday 17 June 2005 19:48, Tom Collins wrote:
All other domains have catchall or delete instead of
bounce-no-mailbox?
No. From my original message:
On Friday 17 June 2005 10:18, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
All accounts look the same as far as I can tell:
# cat /var/vpopmail/domains
in
vpasswd files, that would be very useful to us!!
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
On Friday 17 June 2005 19:31, Rod Taylor wrote:
We would prefer to donate patches back to the vpopmail
application, via quality review and other standard approval
processes, than write our own methods to accomplish a similar
task.
That's the spirit! Congratulations!
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen
the best solution I can think of
would be to write a custom SMTP server like rblmstpd that instead of checking
RBLs, checked a local database for an allowed recipient domains list for the
account trying to send, or simply a boolean external value as you propose.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http
would assume that they meant they
wanted to keep mail within their domain - none of the other domains on that
server!
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http
solution, but an easy quick fix anyways, and anything's
better than hours of customers complaining because something's broken... You
can even have a second server installed, configured, and ready to go in the
case of an emergency.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL
.
If you do want to BCC the mailing list, you'll need to edit the editor file
inside the mailing list directory and change ezmlm-reject to ezmlm-reject
-T.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
, that this is not really a valid solution unless you host
only one domain on the mail server, in which case I have to wonder why you
run vpopmail at all. If joe.com and bob.com are hosted on the same server,
they'll be able to send each other mail even with the above measures.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen
a subscription file that the IMAP server uses. We call clamav,
dspam, and spamassassin from maildrop, and filter accordingly: Spam to a
filtered folder, and virii to /dev/null. :)
Users can then set up their own filtering rules as well, if you choose to
allow it.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen
,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
On Monday 23 May 2005 21:51, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
Why does vpopmail show users for a domain as 1 or 0, when there are
actually 10 users?
vdominfo showed 1, then I removed .dir-control, and now it shows 0:
No ideas on this???
Another question, why does vuserinfo show a last auth time
uid:89
gid:89
dir:/var/vpopmail/domains/DOMAINNAME
users: 0
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
if vpopmail
did the same thing.
Is that a realistic possibility?
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | SeattleServer, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
http://www.seattleserver.com
- very strange. Also
strange is that it will sometimes be allcaps instead of lower-case.
Ahh well, all is working well now.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe - Open Source Software Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://osss.net
in advance for any advice.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe - Open Source Software Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://osss.net
who
have purchased spam filtering, but not for all domains. domain/etc/skel
won't work though, because I might have a user named etc. Maybe
domain/.skel or vpopmail home/etc/domain/skel?
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe - Open Source Software Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://osss.net
On Thursday 09 December 2004 21:01, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
DOMAIN=tolower($HOST)
USERNAME=tolower($EXT)
VHOME=/var/vpopmail/domains/$DOMAIN/$USERNAME
VHOME=`/home/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, the above are identical in that $EXT
like a few additional folders created and subscribed to by default
for antispam purposes.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | AIM/Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ: 1494523
On Wed, November 24, 2004 9:32 pm, Casey Allen Shobe said:
Upon restarting services, I've found that bincimap authenticates okay, and
qmail-send delivers mail... However qmail-smtpd cannot authenticate
And neither qmailadmin. So imap and mail delivery work, but qmailadmin
and smtp auth don't
system use via TLS to relay.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, November 25, 2004 11:38 am, Tom Collins said:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
find / -group 1004 -print0 | xargs -0 chown 89
I assume you meant chgrp 89.
You are correct, I typoed when typing the email, not the actual command.
To verify, I have ensure
On Thu, November 25, 2004 11:02 am, Casey Allen Shobe said:
On Thu, November 25, 2004 9:50 am, Tom Collins said:
What are the permissions on qmailadmin?
-rwsr-sr-x1 vpopmail vchkpw 438385 Aug 26 09:53 qmailadmin
Mine was not ug+s, but that would not have changed. I went ahead
working with vchkpw yet, though...
--
Casey Allen Shobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, November 25, 2004 1:08 pm, Casey Allen Shobe said:
I'll keep digging...
Aha, seems that once vchkpw was SUID root, and qmail-smtpd was restarted,
everything worked grand.
The core of my problem here was that I did not realize chown would remove
SUID/SGID bits, and learned the really
authenticate and send mail fine, but this is not
acceptable in the long-term as most of my mail users do not have machine
accounts.
Could anyone advise me as to what might be going wrong here? Your help is
greatly appreciated!
--
Casey Allen Shobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticate and send mail fine, but this is not
acceptable in the long-term as most of my mail users do not have machine
accounts.
Could anyone advise me as to what might be going wrong here? Your help is
greatly appreciated!
--
Casey Allen Shobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
good advice (especially the bit about qmail
users) in case I try to change UIDs again, but the need for the suexec cgi
isn't that great, and the results are horrible, so I doubt I'll ever try
again. I just want to get vchkpw working with qmail-smtpd again...
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe
[EMAIL
49 matches
Mail list logo
