尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:59e8863641491084871729!
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il
On 09/21/2015 02:26 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>> I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
>> security hole.
>> Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
>> checking (at all).
>>
>> Regards,
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In
On 09/21/2015 03:02 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
security hole.
Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2015 09:30 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Applies perfectly! Thanks!
>>
>> On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
succeed against the
5.5.0 trunk. Patches should be made against the most recent revision, which
can be checked out via
Subversion from Sourceforge.
On 09/18/2015 08:11 AM,
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the
On 09/17/2015 04:04 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
>>> 5.5.0, some of it
>>> had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the snprintf
>>> tidy up's and the
>>>
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
from 5.4.29 to
5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
> from 5.4.29 to
> 5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0 stalled ?
Drew, I'd be happy to take a look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I
> When spamassassin is enabled but maildrop is not I see failed assertions in
> dovecots POP server[2], which are caused by vdelivermail using a wrong
> filename. The filename, more exactly the S= value is calculated
> _before_ the mail is piped into spamassassin, which adds two more header
>
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e0eb41551555158803!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e35941551360728760!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e55641551049011877!
This is probably why the 5.4.0 is still not considered as stable (the latest
stable version is still 5.4.33)
-Original Message-
From: Drew Wells [mailto:drew-vpopm...@elysium.ltd.uk]
Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2015 11:19
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Segmentation fault
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and problems tha new features.
Why you need
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e27941558004510909!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e1cc41551654711741!
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
I do not understand the problem.
Of course
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is
Yes, I know - that's I did some work on 5.5.0 and fixed the segmentation
fault to try and get it closer to stable.
On 09/15/2015 10:39 AM, Thibault Richard wrote:
This is probably why the 5.4.0 is still not considered as stable (the latest
stable version is still 5.4.33)
-Original
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:5595fb4341556565779328!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/10/2014 10:36 AM, John Stile wrote:
I have not seen any new additions to the mysql table vlog for a long time, so
I am worried an
update broke something.
I am using vpopmail-5.4.33-r1, mysql-5.5.40, and netqmail-1.06-r2
I tried to
Hello,
I tested the patch, but an error occurs for qmailadmin-1.2.16-0.el6.x86_64.
Could there be a new version of this patch.
Best regards,
Nikolay
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com wrote:
Sorry, forgot the link to the QmailAdmin patch:
The vchkpw program verifies the password. Are you wondering about the vpasswd
program for changing a password? That's an admin program, and wouldn't
typically enforce a password change policy.
How do your users currently change their passwords? QmailAdmin? Some other
program? You would
I haven't checked the configuration in some time, so I don't know about minimum
password requirements.
I did recall this patch on SourceForge to call out to cracklib and require a
strong password.
If you're comfortable with Javascript, you could modify the change password
screen to
Sorry, forgot the link to the QmailAdmin patch:
http://sourceforge.net/p/qmailadmin/patches/28/
-Tom
On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
I haven't checked the configuration in some time, so I don't know about
minimum password requirements.
I did recall this patch on
On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
for imap and pop3 services. We're simply looking to take the next
logical step.
Not answering your question, but:
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have presumed that the user d-q files would have been processed
before the domain d-q files. Makes me
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tries to deliver a message to the domain it looks at
all of the .qmail-* files in the
On 08/27/2014 11:24 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tries to deliver a message to the domain it
On 8/28/2014 7:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:24 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local
Rick,
At issue was that qmail only processes the .qmail-alias files in the domain
directory. It then hands off to vdelivermail via the .qmail-default file in
the domain directory.
The vdelivermail program is what parses the user/.qmail file for delivery
instructions. While that file follows
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 08/25/2014 05:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
I block the spam before it enters the system using simscan.
Thanks - not an option here since I need to allow users to opt in or out,
etc.
The simcontrol file allows you to
Charles,
It's been a long time since I've worked in that code, but here are some quick
thoughts:
1) There's already code reading the headers, searching for mail loops by
looking at the Delivered-To header. You could tap into that code.
2) You could look at simscan.c to see how they're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, Teodor! I'll take a look at this.
On 07/03/2014 10:36 AM, Teodor Milkov wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to vpopmail 5.4.33 I started seeing much more IO requests. I
see that in 5.4.32
the following code was added to maildirquota.c:
/*
:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re:
[SPAM] Rrdirection problem
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that
the message go to the ssiad
[mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar
2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that
the message go
Stéphane,
try in this way:
* delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr
* create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr
* insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr
In this way it should work.
Tonino
Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
That could very well be, Tom.
Il 17/04/2014 20:39, Jeremy Kister ha scritto:
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06
so I plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I
want to add chkuser and tls but also few others like the
Il 17/04/2014 21:48, Remo Mattei ha scritto:
Hi Jeremy I tried your patch against 1.06 here is the output maybe you can help
out.
The Jeremy's patch should be apply starting from qmail-1.03. Please,
read TO INSTALL note.
Ciao
--
Alessio Cecchi is:
@ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/
on
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the
message go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to
spa...@piemont.fr
And when i send a massage to ss...@piemont.fr i
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been
Do u know what does this patch include will it work on netqmail 1.06?
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone ()
Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
vpopmail...@jeremykister.com ha scritto:
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want
Nice does it have tls?
Inviato da iPhone ()
Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
vpopmail...@jeremykister.com ha scritto:
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I
plan to recomp it and
On 4/17/2014 2:52 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Nice does it have tls?
no TLS; i use all SSL. o well. :)
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
!DSPAM:5350261b34264808310748!
Hi Jeremy I tried your patch against 1.06 here is the output maybe you can help
out.
Thanks
rw-r--r-- 1 root root 167 Apr 17 13:41 cdbmake_add.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 236 Apr 17 13:41 cdb_seek.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 459 Apr 17 13:42 dns.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 312 Apr 17
On Apr 14, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com wrote:
On 04/14/2014 03:32 PM, Tom Ierna wrote:
In any case, I'm again looking into how to make a domain on one of my
vpopmail/qmail servers use
the + separator for subaddresses, rather than -, and I'm coming up dry.
I realize
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2014 03:32 PM, Tom Ierna wrote:
In any case, I'm again looking into how to make a domain on one of my
vpopmail/qmail servers use
the + separator for subaddresses, rather than -, and I'm coming up dry. I
realize that
changing the
if they are from
overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly?
-
FROM: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com
TO: vchkpw@inter7.com
SENT: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
SUBJECT: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587
the way they connect? Or will their email clients just
automate the change?
From: c...@milos.co.za c...@milos.co.za
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw]
Qmail
automate the change?
*From:* c...@milos.co.za c...@milos.co.za
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
*Subject:* [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM]
Re: [vchkpw
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y
répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
T :
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication.
vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or
by other servers delivering mail to your server.
-Tom
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41
...@tomlogic.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 10:02:12 PM GMT-08:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication.
vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can
?
From: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require
if they are from
overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly?
From: Tom Collins t...@tomlogic.com
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2014 05:34 AM, Simone Lazzaris wrote:
The file descriptor number 5 of that process is pointing at the maildirsize
file of the mailbox,
and is marked as deleted in /proc/procid/fd
We store the mail in a NetApp NFS share, without locking
.com
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:14:37 AM GMT-06:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Bug in maildirquota.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2014 05:34 AM, Simone Lazzaris wrote:
The file descriptor number 5 of that process is pointing at the maildirsize
file of the mailbox
00
Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: FBBE -- INTERNET i...@bnpparibasfortis.be
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 6:16:54 PM GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Bug in maildirquota.c
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous
Hi Eric,
i have it under:
libvpopmail_a-vpopmail.o:
U vauth_getpw
libvpopmail_a-vauth.o:
0caa T vauth_getpw
libvpopmail_a-vutil.o:
U vauth_getpw
So i think it is ok.
Thank you
Bye
Marcello
Il giorno 14/dic/2013, alle ore 03:01, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
Hello,
Yes i have done it but it is not woking.
Anyway the make distclean is useless in the vusaged directory. It doesn’t
produce any effect since the Makefile have still to be created because
./configure is not working.
The libvpopmail.a is correctly found and loaded in the LDCONFIG.
Any hint?
Hi,
yes all is correct:
the only libvpopmail.a found are:
/usr/src/vpopmail-5.4.33/libvpopmail.a
/home/vpopmail/lib/libvpopmail.a
and are identical files.
I think the issue can reside in the way the configure script make the check of
vauth_getpw in the libvpopmail or depending on some
Hi,
Thank you.
I tried in vpopmail-5.4.33 dir:
make distclean
autoreconf
automake
autoconf
./configure --enable-tcpserver-file=/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp \
--disable-roaming-users \
--enable-onchange-script \
--enable-auth-module=mysql \
--enable-logging=p \
--disable-mysql-limits \
Hi Marcello,
I am looking at my installation and I do not have vusaged are you sure you are
using 5.4.33?
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 12:21:39, Marcello Lupo (ml...@itspecialist.it) wrote:
vusaged
!DSPAM:52ab6d5c34264660412975!
One more thing, I am looking at my compile location and I do have it, I do get
a shared lib but I am not using it on my server.
Anyhow, I will check and let you know.
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 12:21:39, Marcello Lupo (ml...@itspecialist.it) wrote:
vusaged
I remember now. This file
./lib/libvpopmail.so was created with 5.5 but then vadmin was not working. So
I went back to 5.4.33. and I disabled the file and everything works fine but
this command vusaged
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 14:17:05, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net)
Hi,
I have all correct I think.
/home/vpopmail/etc/lib_deps contains:
-L/home/vpopmail/lib -lvpopmail -Xlinker -R -Xlinker /usr/lib/mysql
-L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt
So it is correct.
If you see in my log:
checking for ev.h... yes
checking for ev_loop_new in -lev... yes
Nice I will chk
Inviato da iPhone ()
Il giorno Dec 13, 2013, alle ore 14:47, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net ha
scritto:
On 12/13/2013 03:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Well, I think I know why my build fails, as I've patched vpopmail to
alter the location of the includes and lib directories.
Replying to myself…
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.vpopmail/20650
Looks like I need 5.4.33. Built it with most of the strncpy and other nice
patches, compiled clean, and I'll do some testing tomorrow. If it holds up,
I'll submit my updated port to the FreeBSD folks and see if they'll
Hello,
any news on this issue?
I have exactly this issue on ubuntu server 12.04 LTS x86_64 .
checking for vauth_getpw in -lvpopmail... no
checking for vauth_getall in -lvpopmail... no
checking for get_domain_entries in -lvpopmail... no
checking for client_query_quick in -lvpopmail... yes
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y
répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
T :
00
Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: i...@bnpparibasfortis.be
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:52:58 PM GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en
Hi everyone,
I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for the
domain then I use the .qmail-default otherwise single user is .qmail-username.
Just my 2 cents.
--
Remo Mattei
November 26, 2013 at 7:57:29, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) ha scritto:
I'm curious to
SA
T : +32(0)2 762 20 00
Montagne du Parc 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Bruxelles | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: Remo Mattei r...@italy1.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:58:19 AM GMT-08:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
Hi everyone,
I just want to add
Chère Madame,
Cher Monsieur,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront le plus rapidement possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Merci de ne pas y répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis
that will work as well.
--
Remo Mattei
November 26, 2013 at 8:32:11, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) ha scritto:
Hey Remo.
On 11/26/2013 08:58 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for
the domain then I use the .qmail-default
Anything further on this?
Hello Eric,
Since I didn't get any answer from vpopmail developers, I created my own
solution: a wrapper, vsanitize, which you use in command invocation in
.qmail file, i.e. instead of writing
| foobar args
you invoke
| vsanitize foobar args
and foobar will be
Il 02/10/2013 03:30, Charles Sprickman ha scritto:
Simple question I hope…
What's the recommendation on the vpopmail side on integrating Dovecot's LDA for
final delivery?
I've seen various suggestions, including just calling it from the user's .qmail
file. In that particular case, it's not
On 6/22/2013 9:11 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
hrm. i replaced vchkpw with checkpasswd. still broken.
ends up the problem was actually stunnel/openssl. who knows what it was
doing that was causing the tunneled program to behave incorrectly.
for reference:
on debian 6 (squeeze):
sed
On 6/22/2013 10:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Have you found where in the code the oops messages is being issued?
yes. it complains only here:
if (wait_pid(wstat,child) == -1) return err_child();
if (wait_crashed(wstat)) return err_child();
the wait_pid is when everything goes fubar.
i'm
On 6/22/2013 8:26 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
i'm not even sure it's a vpopmail problem, i suppose i may need a cross
post on the qmail list.
hrm. i replaced vchkpw with checkpasswd. still broken.
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
!DSPAM:51c64afa34132172261138!
Did you recompile qmail and vpopmail after the OS upgrade?
I'm wondering if it's something odd where the size of some data type changed
from 32 to 64 bits after the OS upgrade, and one program is using the new size
(perhaps because of a dynamically linked library) and the other is still using
Allan Dukat vch...@dukat.dk escreveu:
Hello everyone on this list.
If I comment out the free-lines in in valias_select_names_end in vpalias.c,
like this:
void valias_select_names_end()
{
int i;
/* if( NULL != names ) {
for(i=0;inum_names;i++){
free(names[i]);
}
Best Regards
Thibault a.k.a Thibs
From: swaroop kumar [mailto:swaroopk...@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi 16 mai 2013 14:23
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir to
vpopmail/domains/domain directory
Hi,
Permissions seems to be ok.
drwxrwx
I word of caution. Qmailrocks is not a good way to learn how to install
Qmail.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:14 AM, swaroop kumar swaroopk...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I am switching my mail server from sendmail to qmail, currently installing
qmail in debian and i am following this link
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir
to vpopmail/domains/domain directory
** **
Hi,
Permissions seems to be ok.
drwxrwx--- 8 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 May 16 13:56 vpopmail
Regards,
Swaroop.
** **
On Thu, May 16, 2013
** **
** **
Thibault a.k.a Thibs
** **
*From:* swaroop kumar [mailto:swaroopk...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* jeudi 16 mai 2013 14:23
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir
to vpopmail/domains/domain directory
** **
Hi
If you're talking about QmailAdmin, you need to make sure it's got the suid bit
set and is owned by the vpopmail user.
You shouldn't have changed Apache to run as vpopmail, and should revert those
changes.
If vpopmail is working for you, you should focus your efforts on
troubleshooting
1 - 100 of 12590 matches
Mail list logo
