Please, before anyone simply responds with switch to dovecot, I have reasons
to stick with courier at this time despite the performance gains that I
might receive from switching to dovecot. I have a setup which uses the
shared folder setup on courier and I don't believe the shared folder support
Hi folks,
I'm considering re-compiling vpopmail with the --without-users-big-dir
option. My understanding is this will
1) stop the directory hashing of usernames in the
~vpopmail/domains/domain.com/ directories
2) enable single character e-mail usernames
First, is my understanding of those t
At 10:34 AM 10/4/2005, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
as you might guess from my previous message, i'm installing
qmail-tap for the first time. something that's not entirely clear is
whether qmail-tap is 'self filtering' in the following sense.
if i set up a taps file like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
as you might guess from my previous message, i'm installing qmail-tap
for the first time. something that's not entirely clear is whether
qmail-tap is 'self filtering' in the following sense.
if i set up a taps file like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
will qmail-tap know to not tap t
Thanks so much Sylwester !
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester S. Biernacki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fernando Milovich"
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Question about domains in vpopmail
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 7:44:02 AM, Fer
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 7:44:02 AM, Fernando wrote:
> People, after i rebuild new 5.4.10 vpopmail version, when i add
> a new domain from CLI, breaks the typical structure of
> ~vpopmail/domains/domain.com
> for this one
> ~vpopmail/domains/1/domain.com
> with numbers like 2,3, etc ... bef
People, after i rebuild new 5.4.10 vpopmail
version, when i add a new domain from CLI, breaks the typical structure
of
~vpopmail/domains/domain.com
for this one
~vpopmail/domains/1/domain.com
with numbers like 2,3, etc ... before the domain
... why it is this happening?
Thanks so much,
Got it.. I just wanted to make sure that I was understanding what it
was.. thanks :)
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:34:40 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 17 September 2004 07:34 am, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph
On Friday 17 September 2004 07:34 am, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Hi,
> On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph
> displaying?
It is displaying the averaged number of messages per hour.
> I know MRTG takes 5 minute averages but what exactly is
> it averaging?
Every 5 mi
Hi,
On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph
displaying? I know MRTG takes 5 minute averages but what exactly is
it averaging? I know it's doing the messages.. but how do you do
msg/hour in a 5 minute average? I guess I'm missing some sort of
logic there..
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:18 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
Yep. Looks like whoever added the Warning message code needed to
ifdef it with the big user dir define.
Added to CVS and scheduled for 5.4.7.
--- vpopmail.c 26 Jun 2004 02:20:56 - 1.28.2.4
+++ vpopmail.c 1 Jul 2004 05:29:45 - 1.28.2.5
@@ -262,9
On Jun 30, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
What version of vpopmail? I thought we took care of that error
message ("Warning: Failed to delete dir_control for test.com") during
the development cycle leading up to 5.4.0. It was due to the domain's
directory getting deleted before the dir_c
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it can't delete the dir
c
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 06:13 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
> so I configured with it.
>
> It seems to still do the following though:
>
> 1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
> 2. complain when removing a domain t
Ken,
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it can't delete the dir control.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./vadddomain
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 03:37 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
> First, is there a way to disable the Dir Control functionality of
> vpopmail?
Sure. Use this option
--disable-users-big-dir
>
> If not, is there any downside to just not using it?
Just the optimization for keeping the number of directories
First, is there a way to disable the Dir Control functionality of
vpopmail?
If not, is there any downside to just not using it?
You may ask why I need to do this.
We do our own hashing of directories and usernames here, using our own
script systems.
I like this because the paths that we are crea
Hello guys does anyone have seen a problem with matt's patch for mysql I
cannot get it compiled and it tells me that missing db.h etc... any
suggestions.
Here is the patch info..
http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/ucspi-tcp-0.88-mysql.patch
Thanks,
Remo Mattei
Network Security Engineer
cell
On Apr 29, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Sean Plaice wrote:
2) Change the evaluation in vadddomain() to use MAX_PW_DIR instead of
MAX_PW_DOMAIN.
Thanks for finding that. You are correct.
--- vpopmail.c 4 Mar 2004 05:17:54 - 1.28.2.1
+++ vpopmail.c 30 Apr 2004 03:49:42 -
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
Hello,
Earlier today we had a customer with a long domain name sign up for our
services (.com).
I used the following command and arguments to add the domain to vpopmail.
vadddomain -q10M -b .com.
When adding them using the vp
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 00:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sir,
>
> I do not understand this log message here;
>
> ///
> Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742
> from <>
> qp 24127 uid 507
> Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 10774099
2:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [vchkpw] question
>
>Sir,
>
>I do not understand this log message here;
>
>///
>Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324:
>bytes 1742
>from <>
> qp 24127
Sir,
(B
(BI do not understand this log message here;
(B
(B///
(BFeb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742
(Bfrom <>
(B qp 24127 uid 507
(BFeb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.700893 starting delivery 82: msg
(B3670324 t
y, January 17, 2004 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Question about roaming
Shane Chrisp wrote:
> I run 15 minutes for open relay and clearopensmtp every minute from
> crontab.
I'm sorry, Shane, but I'm very tired and I don't understand.
--en
ad
to
the system, so I don't see the harm. I would rather have the relay cleared
from
the table sooner than later.
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrea Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, 17 January 2004 10:40 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE
Shane Chrisp wrote:
> I run 15 minutes for open relay and clearopensmtp every minute from
> crontab.
I'm sorry, Shane, but I'm very tired and I don't understand.
--enable-relay-clear-minutes=15
*/1 * * * * /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp
2>&1 > /dev/null
?
Thanks
And
Hi folks,
Could you send me your advices about the most secure configuration of
roaming vpopmail's option?
--enable-relay-clear-minutes=# how many minutes?
clearopensmtp: in crontab, but when? Every hour?
Thanks for all
Regards
Andrea
The --enable-spam-command support in qmailadmin 1.0.29 puts the maildrop
line at the end of the .qmail file after all forwards and autoresponders.
I'm just asking because I don't know, but wouldn't it make more sense to
have the spam line /first/ so any emails suspected as being spam can be
dis
> > If a program invoked from a .qmail file returns an exit status of 99
> > (per qmail-command man page) shouldn't it just stop processing the
> > qmail file? It seems to be deferring the message and trying to
> > redeliver it later.
>
> I just checked the ChangeLog, and that was fixed in 5.3
On Friday, November 28, 2003, at 09:19 PM, Yermo M. Lamers wrote:
I am running the Qmail Toaster as available from www.qmailtoaster.com.
(vpopmail-toaster-5.3.8).
There's something about the behavior of the .qmail files in the
individual vpopmail account directories that I don't understand.
If
I am running the Qmail Toaster as available from www.qmailtoaster.com.
(vpopmail-toaster-5.3.8).
There's something about the behavior of the .qmail files in the
individual vpopmail account directories that I don't understand.
If a program invoked from a .qmail file returns an exit status of 99
HI all,
quick question,
i've created some email accounts under a domain
using qmailadmin, and i'm not going to be changing mailbox formats cause i'm a
retard and forgot to install pop service using qmail-pop3d, i must change it to
maildir...now do i have to delete those accounts and remak
> Gary wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Ok i'm got vpopmail installed on my qmail server, now i have a quick
> > question about adding domains
> >
> > when setting up a new domain do i set it up as just
> >
> > vadddomain domain.com
> > or as
> > vadddomain mail.domain.com ( assuming mail. is the
Gary wrote:
Hi all,
Ok i'm got vpopmail installed on my qmail server, now i have a quick
question about adding domains
when setting up a new domain do i set it up as just
vadddomain domain.com
or as
vadddomain mail.domain.com ( assuming mail. is the mx record in dns )
Hi,
What ever the @domain
Hi all,
Ok i'm got vpopmail installed on my qmail server, now i have a quick
question about adding domains
when setting up a new domain do i set it up as just
vadddomain domain.com
or as
vadddomain mail.domain.com ( assuming mail. is the mx record in dns )
I think it is the first one but jsut w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I´ve found the solution myself ... in the ChangeLog it sais that with version 5.2.1 "EXITCODE checking for vdelivermail" has been put in and I´m currently using 5.2 :(
So forget about my question, please give me an answer for this one:
Is it save to upgrade from 5.2 to 5
I´ve found the solution myself ... in the ChangeLog it sais that with version 5.2.1
"EXITCODE checking for vdelivermail" has been put in and I´m currently using 5.2 :(
So forget about my question, please give me an answer for this one:
Is it save to upgrade from 5.2 to 5.2.1 on an running system
Hi everybody,
I´ve got a question concerning the internal strucutre of vpopmail.
I´ve set up a qmail system together with vpopmail ( qmail 1.03 & vpopmail 5.2 ).
I´m testing with two different domains and everything is working fine for me.
What I now wanted to do is set up some kind of simple ant
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:31, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> For the sake of vacation replies (since I'm sure those are used far more
> than "Mail robots") I'm going to release a new version with changes to
> the exit codes, but also place a bug report with qmailadmin about this
> activity.
oops, I apolog
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:08, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> This is more of an opinion question than a request for help.
>
replying to my own request for advice. After looking further at the
code, it appears that it may be acting properly if it were only to be
used as a standalone autoresponder.
Howev
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 13:20, Flavio Curti wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:08:39PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > AUTORESPOND: I can't handle a message with a Mailing-List header.
> sadly this is not the only time autorespond uses the wrong exit code:
> AUTORESPOND: too many rec
Hi Jeremy
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:08:39PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> AUTORESPOND: I can't handle a message with a Mailing-List header.
sadly this is not the only time autorespond uses the wrong exit code:
AUTORESPOND: too many received from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(this gets triggered when a user
This is more of an opinion question than a request for help.
I received a call from a client that was having problems with ezmlm and
autoresponder. autoresponder would bounce messages from his ezmlm list
and eventually ezmlm would remove him from the list (this is after
setting up the autorespond
At 08:49 AM 9/10/2003, Ewald Geschwinde wrote:
Have I done something wrong with the vpopmail installation?
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lvpopmail
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Ewald...
Make sure you have the following two files:
/var/qmail/vpopmail/etc/inc_deps
/var/qmail/vpopmail/etc/lib_
I hav downloaded the courier imap
I have compiled the qmail vpopmail with the qinstall-1.1 from www.obua.org
pop mail is running fine
Now I want to use this with Imap
I'm compiling with courier-imap-2.1.1
Here is the error output:
The problem is the vpopmail is installed perfect
I'm finding a
PROTECTED]'
Cc:
Subject: [vchkpw] Question on 553 error
Hi guys can someone give me more info on why someone that is trying to send
a message to me gets this error?
553 sorry, your envelope sender
PM
> To: David Hubbard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Question on 553 error
>
>
> This user is not even on my box :)
> She is just sending message to one of my client which is on
> this box :) Thanks and I am open for more suggestions ..
> -- Remo Matt
Hi guys can someone give me more info on why someone that is trying to send
a message to me gets this error?
553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied
I am almost positive that her email client is not setup correctly Any
fee back are welcomed.
Thanks,
-- Remo Mattei --cell 801-2
Linux Trainer & Firewall Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "David Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 20:11:44 -0400
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Question on 553 error
>
> That's an e
Hi there, I have 3 server with vpopmail
And in my script to start qmail I have:
csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc &'
env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
tcpserver -H -R -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-c20 -u201 -g90 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > /dev/null &
env - PATH="/var/qmail/
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] question re faq
>
> faq item 34 discusses getting courier-imap to use vpopmail's roaming users
>
As far as I know, roaming users doesn't work with
the courier-imap authlib, at least with authdaemond.
I've patched my version and when I get cycles planned
on submitting a patch to Mr. Sam to allow authdaemond
to have it work. The problem is that vpopmail relies
on environment variables that are
faq item 34 discusses getting courier-imap to use vpopmail's roaming
users functionality. i just noticed in the changelog for courier-imap, it
states:
2001-02-08 Chris Seawood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* authlib:
Added check for open_smtp_relay in -lvpopmail
so, does that mean that faq i
Hi guys I have a question if you do not mind my asking guys. I have
installed qmailadmin vanilla and it get errors permission errors when I try
to create a user. So I have installed the 1.0.6 and then upgrade to 1.09 and
works fine however, I cannot get the field for quota to show. Do you have
any
Is there a switch I could give vpasswd where I could do a massive amount of
password changes without regenerating the cdb each time? Kind of like
the -s (or -S, I've forgotten) switch in vadduser.
If not, how would I hack at vpasswd.c to make this happen? I know enough C
where if someone shows me
I am using vpopmail with courier-imap as my mail solution and I love it
so far. I've got a small question about shared folders. When creating
a shared mail folder under a shared mailbox directory structure, you use
the -s flag to specify permission to the folder. How can this
work with virt
Hi all,
Got what may be a silly question, but I have read the doccos etc, and
havent found a specific answer to this one.
The file permissions on the ~vpopmail directory structure all map out to
basically only the user vpopmail can access it (well and root of
course), now, to do some things invo
57 matches
Mail list logo
