It's just been suggested to me that since some people have missed out,
maybe we should start a 2nd calendar - have a second 'competing' chain.
I reckon it could already be half filled with people who have missed
out - maybe we'd have to seek out people to fill the remaining
spaces. Or
2009/10/22 Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote:
It's just been suggested to me that since some people have missed out,
maybe we should start a 2nd calendar - have a second 'competing' chain.
I reckon it could already be half filled with people who have missed out -
maybe we'd have to seek
Hi Frank,
I've also thought about this a lot - and am trying to balance keeping
it open while prompting involvement - again, I stress that I don't
want to be 'in charge' of this. So I'm a little reluctant to defend
the idea. But I do have an opinion about your argument - so here it is:
Rupert - I think your original idea is fine. You suggested a creative
way to do navlopomo and people responded. Cool!
If others want to do the same type of thing, nothings stopping them
from starting a second calender ... Or better yet, doing 30 vids and
showing us up bigtime :-)
David
On
For the record, the suggestion of a second calendar was my idea. I
just thought others on the list who didnt get a slot might want to
self-organize another group. Frank and david make compelling arguments
why its not needed.
Its always a balance between getting things moving and no one
in-charge.
It's just a slightly easier way to keep track of things that happened that
year. So if there are 3-4 years of navlopomo, and you search for that tag,
you get everything. But if you search for navlopomo09, you would just find
the stuff happening in 2009 (assuming eeryone used the tag).
I'm
yes. search. the way most people navigate the web. and what i do for a
living. oops.
you're right.
both is a good way to go, i guess... :)
On 22-Oct-09, at 1:20 PM, David King wrote:
It's just a slightly easier way to keep track of things that
happened that
year. So if there are 3-4 years
Hey - just the librarian in me showing it's ugly head :-)
David Lee King
davidleeking.com - blog
davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
twitter | skype: davidleeking
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote:
yes. search. the way most people navigate the web. and what
...that is a great moment...showing...
Sincerely,
Adam W. Warner
http://LearnWebTools.com
http://WordPressModder.org
From: Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, October 21,
Hi Adam,
If you're looking for hacks with existing OSX tools I can't help you
but I'll offer this.
Some time ago I upgraded from ishowu to iShowu HD ($29.95 and $59.95
versions) which has the ability to insert a small window in your
screencast. Works pretty well but iShowU remains a
If you can't use PhotoBooth or QT because you only want to see the
image of yourself, not the other controls, then I would record it
separately and insert it in FCP on top of the screencast. Then you
can crop out the edges, scale it, move it around, make it appear
disappear, etc.
On
Thanks Julian,
Hmmm. I am running iShowU HD Pro...I'm not seeing that insert window option. I
have a support request in, but maybe I just need to look harder...
Sincerely,
Adam W. Warner
http://LearnWebTools.com
http://WordPressModder.org
My Recommended Web Hosting
Thanks Rupert,
No FCP here :( Just iMovie
Sincerely,
Adam W. Warner
http://LearnWebTools.com
http://WordPressModder.org
My Recommended Web Hosting
From: Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv
To:
If you record the QT video of you first, and play back it in the
screen while you record the screencast (instead of recording your face
simultaneously), you can get rid of the QT controls by going to Window
Show Movie Properties Presentation Movie Controller Type: None
Although I can't
Thanks for the suggestion Rupert (and Julian, Ryanne, David, etc), but I've
found the Toggle Camera control in iShowU. It places a nice window in the
upper right but seems to be lacking a bit in options...resizing, etc.
Sincerely,
Adam W. Warner
http://LearnWebTools.com
Looks like I missed the NaVlo Calender Boat. Ah well. The popcorn's gorgeous
and I'll have a good seat near the screen throughout November so I'm not really
complaining. I remember shooting one video a day for NaVloPoMo in November 2007
and it nearly killed me (especially considering I hadn't a
1 minute is a very nice constraint, might have missed conversation but
others: size? format? do we care?
On 22/10/2009, at 2:11 AM, Rupert Howe wrote:
This was my instinct, too. Or at most two minutes. I've been doing
this other project with one minute videos, and it works really well.
You
My quest for a cheap new videoblogging camera continues...
I came across the Kodak Zi8 HD pocket camcorder:
http://store.kodak.com/store/ekconsus/en_US/pd/Zi8_Pocket_Video_Camera/productID.156585800
Test footage looks really good:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX-raL4iQoY
and the main benefit is
David Jones wrote:
I don't need the full HD, but 720 HD would be nice.
At the highest settings, the Zi8 does exhibit some weirdness with
motion. Fine for talking heads, not good for action.
Any comments on the Zi8 for video blogging?
Anyone know of any other pocket video cams with an
2009/10/23 Bohuš bo...@xnet.com:
At the highest settings, the Zi8 does exhibit some weirdness with
motion. Fine for talking heads, not good for action.
I'm just a talking head so that's fine!
Any comments on the Zi8 for video blogging?
Anyone know of any other pocket video cams with an
20 matches
Mail list logo
