t spell, you should see the captions photographers write). There was a
strong resistance against spell checkers from both journalists and copy
editors. The culture was that somehow a spell checker insinuated that you
didn't know the language well. The result was of course a massive amount
n troubled water, you should refrain from
writing e-mails as the one I'm quoting here.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
the future is flamebait and mudslinging
and we don't need that.
So knock it off. Please. Like you say: Create something innovative. That
ain't gonna happen in this thread.
- Andreas
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
he misuse of 51 photos? That's almost
$150,000 per photo. And people wonder why we make fun of the US legal
system. That amount is insane and totally inappropriate.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Not completely on topic, but not off either. I just posted an entry
> on my blog. In a nutshell, I don't care about HD...just good content.
>
> http://www.joshpaul.com/?p=250
>
> --
> joshpaul
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
h
> politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do you honestly think
that they were made for shits and giggles?
- Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
do it without losing what little
> quality the camera is able to produce.
>
> I apologize if this is a retread of an old thread, but a quick search of
> the group archives didn't turn anything up.
>
> --
> Rob Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vees.net/
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Den 23.12.2006 kl. 11:34 skrev Adam and Vikki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What about climatechange as a tag?
May I suggest "climatecrisis" as a reference to
http://www.climatecrisis.net/
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
r another, but as part of
> other posts.
>
> What are your big plans for 2007?
>
> Seems like some folks will be following politicians around. Others are
> gathering the creative masses. What's YOUR move?
>
> --Chris...
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ing, you
open it up again by removing some or all of your copyrights. Your license
works because it's an extension of or created under copyright laws.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
IP (which don't have
> usable user-agent reporting anyway).
Not to mention that Referer and User Agent headers are arbitrary and it
would be less than trivial for a myheavy.com site to identify itself as
blip.tv or vPIP respectively. If it wanted to.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
you can only sue
for proven, actual damages.
- Andreas, IANAL either
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ension
("well, my videos are CC, but really they're CC with my own additions").
- Andreas
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ed toward commercial advantage or private monetary
compensation."
That must be determined on a case-by-case basis, obviously.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
was integrated with creative
> commons technologies, specifically their RSS thing, so that this
> detail can be accurately automatically distributed along with the video.
>
> Steve Elbows
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
> <[EMA
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:40:46 +0100, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Well...
>
> a) I wrote a book on HTML, so I don't have a problem with it.
> b) It's not that hard. No harder than a hyperlink.
> c) I use a Blogger post template and just replace the video file URL
> when I post. A
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:15:45 +0100, B Yen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>
>> ..snip..
>> - I like having the player in the
>> same window so I personally use some javascript-fu to have an image
>>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:32:50 +0100, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want a script like these that runs on every site I visit.
>
> Maybe it scrubs the page for all the .mov, .wmv, and .mp4 files and
> presents
> a list of links to them?
>
> Possible?
A Greasemonkey solution is the ob
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:23:54 +0100, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The site, www.israelvideoblog.org, is an effort to highlight a side of
> Israel not often seen in the mainstream press to an English-speaking
> audience, the consulate says. "This is a great platform to bypass the
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:34:55 +0100, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But close only counts in horseshoes and handgrenades.
And curling. :o)
Next version of Opera will have bittorrent built in, but that only helps
the five people other than me who use Opera.
- Andreas
--
http://www.s
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:30 +0100, André Sala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But the problem, it seems, with BITS is that it makes a substantial
> number of webserver requests. If you look at your server log you
> might think that BITS is hammering your bandwidth because of the high
> number of
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:49:00 +0100, Randy Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> can some one link me to todays flash meeting
http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080/fm/index.php?pwd=370e86-3022 >
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo!
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:48:32 +0100, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> this is kind of what i was thinking, but there are hundreds of files that
> need to be moved.
>
> i.e.
>
> rename media/videodirectory media/newvideodirectory
>
> ?
>
> I just don't wanna try it and f something up royall
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:23:09 +0100, Peter Van Dijck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been thinking about my videoblog watching habits...
>
> I almost exclusively watch on the video ipod now. I fill it up at
> mefeedia. My preferred watching places are:
> 1) my television
> 2) the laundrymat
I
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:50:52 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i dont understand about the size stuff
> i've seen some huge rss channel images come through.
>
> can you explain?
Some people don't read specs.
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, com
;
> many people seem to think it's necessary to hit servers with smaller,
> but great numbered requests these days
>
> it's that "experience" thing i think
>
> ;)
>
>
>
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:30 +010
retrieves less information overall (sometimes
>> significantly), since the page display data usually isn't sent.
>>
>> -- Enric
>>
>> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
Sandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe. maybe not ;)
>
> http://www.captain.at/howto-ajax-permission-denied-xmlhttprequest.php
>
>
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>
>> After all Ajax requests are limited to
>> the originating server (for security re
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:31:56 +0100, Markus Sandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but now you have crushed my joy of AJAX hacking and I will not post here
> ever again (or for at least 10 minutes).
Just wait for a REST-based mefeedia API. Then you can start to do build
really cool Ajax applicatio
feeds directly
via Ajax).
Wee: http://api.mefeedia.com/ >
- Andreas
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:50:34 +0100, Markus Sandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, now I'm excited again! :)
>
> oops, i guess the ten min are up
>
>
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>
&
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:10:32 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of the first ten videos, only one is clearly copyrighted with a second
> one probable. The rest are original, amateur works to share with
> friends and others with similar intrests.
What are you trying to say? All those video
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:21:27 +0100, Joshua Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there is a great opportunity for the aggregators to use
> Bayesian-type filtering (think email spam filters) to help gather
> videos of interest to the viewer. If the aggregator can ascertain the
> context from th
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:08:57 +0100, Ms. Kitka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spent a couple of hours fiddling with my outro the other night to
> make a nice new Creative Commons video clip that includes the symbols
> of Attribution, No Money and Share Alike... is there a place to find
> and use th
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:28:14 +0100, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS - notice I was nice and didn't mention EE support hehe! ;)
From skimming the EE pages I see that the free version have Blogger API
support. Have you tried registering your blog as a "Blogger-compatible
blog" in the cr
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:19:57 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2/24/06, Trine Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I suppose if I posted them online they would create quite a nice
>> narrative although they're short, mundane and in norwegian!
>> But alright, you inspired me
I had to Google it: www.stickam.com
And I just left the room, but I did have a nice, short chat. The system is
pretty cool.
- Andreas
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:44:25 +0100, Steve Garfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> URL please...
>
> On Feb 27, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
>
>> I
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:47:38 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick question to those who have an opinion to offer.
>
> How do you feel about aggregators or video hosting sites where you can
> play
> videos increasing the dimensions from 320x240 to a larger scale?
What will you be using these numbers for? Market research or what?
- Andreas
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:37:17 +0100, Cote289 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, specifics
>
> Looking for numbers for the following
>
> # of downloads per episode/blog of your content
> # of episodes/blogs per month
> Av
You can get the answer to your questions (and more) by opening the Movie
Info window in the Quicktime Player. Open an episode of rockboom in a
standalone player and hit Ctrl+I (on Windows). Otherwise go to the Window
menu and choose Show Movie Info.
So your answers are:
> What is rocket boo
It is also the artist's right to act they way they were. Copyright also
includes the right to make poor business decisions regarding recording
live performances.
- Andreas
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:29:35 +0100, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, most likely if the music is good enou
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 07:04:32 +0100, JD Lasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the latest entry:
>
> http://www.ourmedia.org/node/176541
Good stuff. As usual: If you're outside the US (and in this case
California) check your local legislation - it is likely to differ on
several points.
On
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:15:25 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cleanest way I see right now to implement vPIP into Blogger (and
> possibly other blogging software like Typepad) is to make a FireFox
> extension. Do you use FireFox?
Off the top of my head it sounds easier to write a G
Wow that's a lot of code...
As you probably know this isn't the first time a playing-in-place script
has been talked about. :o)
It's my opinion that all the mark-up a blogger should have to write is
something like:
The rel="enclosure" is there to weed out false positives and the
type="vi
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:36:22 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, I'll look into Greasemonkey. Do Firefox extensions also work in
> Opera? (too lazy too look it up :))
Nope, Opera doesn't do any kind of plugins. Greasemonkey scripts work
(along with Opera's own user javascripts, whi
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 21:19:20 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm actually surprised that I haven't seen anyone use the full permalink
> of the post in their video in some way. Is anyone doing that?
I have used a small link at the top left corner of my video called
"permalink"
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:57:41 +0200, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Anybody know what this means, because its in the agreement...
> "You expressly and hereby forever waive and relinquish all so-called
> "moral rights (droit moral)" associated therewith."
Wikipedia to the rescue http:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 04:31:13 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just uploaded the first screening at the Anthology Film Archives here:
> http://www.blip.tv/?id=2264;s=file
I can't help wondering what made you put this monster of a file online
when you could've done a list of lin
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:39:45 +0200, Nerissa (TheVideoQueen)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Windows Movie Maker is free and already located on Windows XP.
> But I dont recommend it. It only makes WMV files. And doesnt burn to
> DVD. It's very limted on effects, tracks, transitions, timel
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:46:08 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "screw clicking" is the new thing!
Blablabla, tv is awesome, the internets are teh suxor.
> It would be cool if there was some sort of playlist and a player that
> supported that playlist to make it all easier though.
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:17:15 +0200, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Michael Verdi and I are going to try to set up a vidoeblog film
> screening in Second Life, an online virtual world. Michael has created
> a viewing screen there and we plan to use some kind of playlist to
> show the
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:15:00 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat and watched
> long streams of uninterrrupted video...and this is a throwback to that
> time.
Exactly! :o)
It's all about the difference between online media and off
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:38:22 +0200, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> some of the conventions of "old media" work really well for new
> media...making something new is just a matter of augmenting what we
> already
> know...we need a place to move from to get where we want to go...
Exactly.
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 19:37:53 +0200, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is why market for 'creation tools' is going to end up being more
> important... receiving tools are everywhere. creation tools, though new
> ones
> have recently been deployed, dont yet have the vast attenti
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:46:34 +0200, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A few of them are experimenting with ways to let users record the video
> directly from a webcam to the website (or upload one naturally).
http://www.audioblog.com/ is supposed to be able to handle that easily.
I'm no
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:27:41 +0200, robert a/k/a r
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is this page failing for everyone?
> http://www.videoblogging.info/support/
Yes, it is. The database got lost when we moved servers, and I haven't
reinstalled it yet.
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commen
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 01:31:52 +0200, Randy Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> can some one send me the link for tonights flashmeeting?
You can always see the links at http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogger_Videoconferences >
The URL for tonight's conference is http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 01:31:30 +0200, ryanne hodson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is in celebration of our new videoblog classroom space- Node101 ::
> NYC!
> We now have a space to teach workshops and have meetups!
I'm 4000 miles aways and will never get to get a feel for that room. Yet
I
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:25:25 +0200, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But... the only item iTunes shows for my "podcast" is that one, which
> happens to be the only MOV in my RSS list. And double-clicking on it does
> not play the movie, only the music. Which, since the music belong
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:32:15 +0200, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could easily be offended by this part but maybe you don't
> understand what we have been up to or maybe I am misunderstanding
> your angle. Either way, no biggie, just couldn't let that one slip
> by. Even if
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:44:30 +0200, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not having a Mac, I don't have good free tools available for QuickTime
> editing - I even paid for QuickTime Pro, and did not find it particularly
> transparent or powerful, nor is the compression good - 12 mb for
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:50:38 +0200, Justin Chapweske
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about we start calling it what it really is: Internet TV.
If that's all it is, a great potential is lost.
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Clint reminded me of video quotes. I'm trying out a new way of showing
them - comments and/or discussion about the format could be cool:
http://www.solitude.dk/archives/20051013-0025/ >
It's a quote from heads off / road node. I added big quote marks to the
video to signal that it's a quote,
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:43:58 +0200, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok. thats cool.
> is their a generator for this quote?
> i actually am also experimenting with vid quoting/clipping.
I used Linkubator for the bottom right image, and then I opened
Linkubator's SMIL movie in my
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:06:37 +0200, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i don't understand why you are shooting for these obcene compression
> sizes...a usual 5 mb/sec is goodyou need broadband to watch videos
> online anyway, so why do you compress yours to the level where the
> quality
>
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:43:58 +0200, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is their a generator for this quote?
I modified Linkubator last night, so it now can generate these quote
movies for you:
http://www.solitude.dk/archives/linkubator/ >
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Co
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:43:39 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> at VlogEurope we didnt have internet acessand it was cool becasue
> you had to listen and participate. haha how would you like it this
> way?
As a non-participant I enjoyed the webcast from the first Vloggercon very
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:31:58 +0200, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And Andreas, you need to be here in the flesh this time. You'll be
> starting
> to miss the U.S. by then anyway.
I'm missing the US now. :o)
Everything needs to work out money wise and stuff (and I have to figure
ou
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:30:24 +0200, Kearney, Pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> only if u live in UK
That's why the quote said: '*UK* users can now download BBC footage for
use in their own films - without paying a penny.'
It is only fair. After all they are the ones who are sponsoring the BBC
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:52:07 +0200, fALk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so why are you making a closed container format .mov and not an open
> container format .mp4 or the now vidiPod .m4v ? Its the same
> compressor and the same quality and the same size (plus minus a few
> bytes) BUT with a .mp4 O
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:14:29 +0200, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For PDF's it doesn't matter.
When you export you have to remember to check the box that says "Embed all
fonts" - otherwise it *does* matter. :o)
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communicat
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:35:49 +0200, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I dont think he was suggesting they are totally the same in terms of
> features, just that the video and audio tracks can be the same, and he
> didnt mention the advantages of mov over mp4.
Same difference. He was ta
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:11 +0200, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I read the page on how to get the automatic ping
> thing to work but there isn't info on how to get it to work with
> blogger. Any idea how to get it to automatically ping with that?
> Thanks again for
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:58:58 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You better not try to remove my name, it'll violate my by-nc-sa license!
> Give me attribution or give me death! ;)
You can only copyright a work, not an idea or concept. Ie. a quick rewrite
later and the problem sol
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:17:16 +0200, Digital <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The Presidents of the United States of America (PUSA) makes a video
> entirely out of ericsson phones.
I'd loved this band since their self-titled debut (mmm... peaches). I'm
glad to see they're doing something fun like
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:54 +0200, robert a/k/a r
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> transcode:
> http://www.panopticist.com/archives/159.html>
It's still H.264 and thus unplayable in my Quicktime 6 :o(
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technolog
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:15:25 +0200, Charles HOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> When you export you have to remember to check the box that says "Embed
> all
> fonts" - otherwise it *does* matter. :o)
> I've heard that this can actually be a violation of copyright.
That depends on:
- What you
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:47:05 +0200, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question. I manually pinged a video earlier that I put up
> yesterday and when I went to ping today's video it wouldn't allow me
> to. It said it had already been pinged but the ping that it is
> recording is yeste
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:14:01 +0200, Dave Huth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be one area where the ethics and law-making on this subject is
> lagging behind
> the technology enabling it. (As usual!)
Not really. There have been more cases than anyone can count. The camera
is not a new i
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:54:33 +0200, Justin Chapweske
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chances are that the usual suspects of Yahoo, Google, Amazon, Microsoft,
> AOL, Napster, and so on will be able to offer much more compelling
> content at a potentially lower price than an independent can.
You hav
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:10:08 +0200, jonny goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My impression of this guy who commented is that he's young, he's
> passionate, and very
> opinionated.
I was surprised to see that he's actually 30 years old. But definitely
passionate and opinionated. He stri
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:22:38 +0200, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the things about putting your stuff out to the world and asking
> for critiques is expecting that some of that world are going to come
> back to you with negative feedback. Some people are just assholes.
That rem
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:37:17 +0200, Dave Huth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you share with us what these answers are?
IANAL so I can't cover details. I recommend this one book over and over
again. It's a college text book called Mass Media Law (by Don Pember) and
it covers all the areas
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:15:28 +0200, aroundtheperimeter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> look what this guy has done..you can leave a video comment!
>
> http://www.blogcheese.com/andre_testo/
Nice user interface, but it'll fail for the everyone who hasn't got a big
server in their basement.
First
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:16:04 +0200, Dave Huth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, Pembroke himself says in this freedomforum.org article ( http://
> www.freedomforum.org/packages/first/privacyandthepress/part3.htm ) that
> general
> intrusion, apart from strictly commercial purposes, is on the
Oh, and I forgot. I think the impact you'll see in the future is not
something that'll arrive from new legal arguments. I still think that all
these areas of public vs. private are age-old and we have plenty of legal
precedence (public views may change and we'll get new laws, but the issues
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:44:18 +0200, Paul Knight
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi worrier,
Hey, I'm not worried. I know the laws to some extent and won't get into
trouble. It's the other people who should worry. :o)
> I think there is a gap in the market now for one of those Bluffer
> Guides o
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:16:39 +0200, Jake Ludington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The more accurate criticism is at comparable bitrates, WMV targeted for
> dial-up users looks better than MOV. This is one of the many reasons
> Apple
> adopted MP4 as their alternate standard.
MOV isn't a codec,
ty/filesize ratio as I can for my WMVs.
>
> On 10/24/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:16:39 +0200, Jake Ludington
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > The more accurate criticism is at comparabl
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:52:13 +0200, Jack Olmsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The autoload MP4 stream did not work on my PC (audio only, no video),
> but the downloadable archive clips did play fine with Windows Media
> Player.
It loaded up fine using the Quicktime plugin here (Win XP/Opera 8).
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:37:58 +0200, Christopher Bergeron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any sugestions or experiance with
> producing an iPod compatible video on a PC?
Export AVI from Movie Maker. Import that into Quicktime Pro and export as
iPod friendly Quicktime movie.
- An
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:30:13 +0200, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tele--to hear, and vision--to see, right?
Tele == Distant. So it's more like "distant viewing". And television ain't
the same as videoblogging, yo. :o)
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communicati
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:49:15 +0200, Charles HOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried Avid Free DV, but I didn't like it very much
> and it was a DOG on my PC.
>
> I tried Premiere 6.5 and it started to crash. Now I'm switching to Avid
> Free,
> but I'm finding it a bit counterintuitive since
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:33:25 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>>
>> Does Avid Free only import DV? I tried to import some random MOV samples
>> the other day, but it wouldn't import correctly. I'm an unfo
e late 80s and early nineties...
>
> On 10/26/05, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> no feed and not a blog.
>> Its a faux blog.
>>
>> -Josh
>>
>>
>> On 10/25/05, Richard Show <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>&g
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:31:23 +0200, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another important part of bloggy text is that it's hypertext, ie.
>> any bit
>> can be a link to somewhere else. Rocketboom doesn't work like that
>> either.
>>
>
> Yes it does. Thats one of the special qualit
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:04:42 +0200, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what are some examples of "bloggy" content, under your seemingly
> unusal, extremist and militant definition?
What did I do to deserve that kind of phrasing? You were all up in arms
about naming rocketboo
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:36:16 +0200, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So give an example. Is there anyone out there now who has a
> "videoblog" and post's videobloggy posts? Can you give a link and
> describe what sets it apart?
As for pointing out of the blog there are time-bas
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 02:04:47 +0200, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I making the right inferences?
No, damnit. You didn't pay attention. I said this is NOT a case of
either/or. It's NOT about "this is a videoblog and this is not a
videoblog". It's a case of "to which de
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:08:21 +0200, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we've been collectively defining
> videoblogging by practicing it for a while now it seems to me that
> the highly granular, hyper-texty video that Andreas holds in high
> regard is only a small part of videoblogging - and i
7 Oct 2005 12:46:53 +0200, Mat Wall-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Not yet its not Andreas...in fact granularity for granularity's sake is
> particularly tedious..at the moment then the 'interest' is purely
> academic
>
>
> On 27/10/05 3:39 P
701 - 800 of 868 matches
Mail list logo
