If you use the relTag format then your posts will show up as tagged in
Technorati and a few other search engines. The new FireAnt directory
will soon be recognizing relTag as well... in due time.
The relTag syntax is super easy and very well explained over here:
I know this is possibly not gonna help at all, but if you want to play
your video on line and not make a link for feedburner for itunes or
fireant, post you video to Dailymotion or Youtube, then blog from there
and they will put a flash version of your video straight on your site,
Ummm...
Not so fast there... Windows Media ain't going away anytime soon.
You wanna know why? Two reasons:
- Its much easier to create Windows Media on PCs than it is to create
Quicktime (just ask any of the Windows users here what they've had to
go through).
- DRM. Imagine you are a hollywood studio.
NO, popup blockers do not block popups that you explicitly click to activate.
Popup blockers only block popups that launch on the page load, but not
upon clicking a link.
-Josh
On 1/19/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, pop-ups are no longer assumed reliable. Firefox and
the media when used this way.
There is nothing hidden.
-Josh
On 1/19/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NO, popup blockers do not block popups that you explicitly click to activate.
Popup blockers only block popups that launch on the page load, but not
upon clicking a link.
-Josh
companies have trademarks pending. We're going to work on
it,
and that's about the best I can say right now.
Yours,
Mike
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it enough separation that one company targets mobile users
Is it enough separation that one company targets mobile users
and the other is for desktop citizens?
Blip.tv also supports mobile uploads. I wouldn't say its only for
desktop citizens.
-Josh
On 1/17/06, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, well I guess it will remain a mystery to me. I'm
Why pack them all together into a 15 min. video?Why not let them each exist as separate videos that can be downloaded quicker and easier? You may as well simply link to the originals too in order to credit the creators.
-joshOn 1/16/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a 15 minute
Christian, it's in the non-public beta, which rumors say will be
released soon.
Will be released publicly very soon.
New Windows version and Website too! Its a big update.
We've been working hard but have been a little quiet about it here in
this group.
-Josh
On 1/16/06, Stephanie Bryant
versions for Mac and Windows
plus a new Website.
-Josh
On 1/16/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I crashed after replying to the last one.
Awake again...
On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why pack them all together into a 15 min. video?
For context
I agree with most of this. If it proves to be true that viewers won't watch
a video until they've read something about it, we'll probably have to rethink
our presentation. Although Rocketboom, Bottomunion, Human-Dog, etc.
Not true. Rocketboom makes great use of text. There are always story
OK, so now i'm wondering if those of us, like me, who prefer shorter
videos are simply more vocal than others. Come on, there's got to be
some people out there who love the longer videos and just can't get
enough of the large files.
-Josh
On 1/16/06, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3
I mean, in theory, if we're talking faster and fatter pipes, won't
file size limitations be a thing of the past?
-josh
On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so now i'm wondering if those of us, like me, who prefer shorter
videos are simply more vocal than others. Come
their commute.
short, long... whatever. its not even worth debating since the wide audience
consists of many different preferences. why ask why and all that.
sull
On 1/16/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For context, and ease of use for the viewer.
But I don't know what's
This trend is easily chalked up to the SNL Lazy Sunday clip, wich was
probably viewed a few million times through YouTube in the span of a
week and a half.
Of course, YouTube should not have allowed this clip to remain on
their servers as its obviously copyright infringement. I would doubt
that
I really should make something similar to that plugin to handle MRSS.
I've wanted to for a long time but have been waiting on the
Microformat crowd to approve some kind of standard for media.
-Josh
On 1/16/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
apparently the videos you can purchase through Google Video Store
aren't made to be played in common media players. Here's a hack to
download AVI versions of the videos:
http://www.querocarromogi.com/videogoogle/
I'm not sure about pay only' videos... very interested
This is true. Its in their features list on the download page for iTunes.
Why would you be in disbelief here? Seems like a natural feature and
the export option is built into QT Pro. BTW, all the features of QT
Pro are accessible from the Quicktime API. This means that when you
buy QT Pro you're
.
And for the record: I think you're the first person to call the QT Pro GUI
nice. Simple, certainly. Nice... Not so much. :o)
- Andreas
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:04:35 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is true. Its in their features list on the download page for iTunes.
Why would you
time
is a
big turn-off unless it happens in the background.
And for the record: I think you're the first person to call the QT
Pro GUI
nice. Simple, certainly. Nice... Not so much. :o)
- Andreas
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:04:35 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Those authors will have limited sales or go out of business. The
average user doesn't want another step to figure out a codec to make
their video work. They want it to simply work and will bypass
:
On Jan 15, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
right... you had to drag the stuff in and it automatically converts.
But it still had to convert. Its just that the interface was simple
and intuitive. I would think that iTunes will try to make the process
roughly the same for video
The Kevin Smith videoblog was posted here in this group a long time ago.
Here it is back on Oct. 3, 2005:
http://groups.google.com/group/videoblogging/browse_thread/thread/ef267ef8fdacdf81/08abebdf2a6e5329?q=kevin+smithrnum=1#08abebdf2a6e5329
-Josh
On 1/15/06, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a lot of people seem to download Democracy Now, which is roughly an
hour and usually something around 120 MB.
Personally, I can't watch anything much over 3 minutes, whether its a
vlog or a TV show. I really don't like to see vlog entries that are
more than 30 MB. Again, this is simply a personal
All I'm saying is let's give them the opportunity to make adjustments
now that the issue has been brought up. Its probably not something the
service owners thought much about. Its likely they simply copied it
from somewhere else. Rather than continue to jump on them here, let's
give them the
do you want to remove the entire feed from iTunes directory, or just a
single item?
-J
On 1/13/06, Christian Wach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Jan 2006, at 02:55, R. Kristiansen wrote:
i need to remove a wordpress rss feed that goes through feedburner
from the iTunes music store. how do
commercial use of this stuff ain't cheap.
I've looked into it too. Depends though.. everything's a negotiation.
Its certainly less expensive to license this encoding technology on
the server side (one license) than to do so for a client side
application (license to distribute multiple copies).
Have you been able to export the whole movie to WMV with Quicktime?
I think it exports the first 10 sec. or so as a trial, but you need to
upgrade to Flip4Mac Studio to be able to really export WMV (that costs
$99 if I recall... if that's free now then I will definitely be
contacting them for my
Okay all... this is great feedback, but seriously let's cut the guy a break.
He's listening and interacting here. That's the first step.
Legaleze like Terms Of Service agreements are hard to write. Nobody
knows what to do here, and paying lawyers to do this gets expensive...
and the lawyers can
that's true. Adobe does own Macromedia.
Not sure what changes you're expecting though.
-J
On 1/13/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard that Adobe bought Macromedia
(http://tinyurl.com/dsd82)...maybe they'll change it up a bit?
On 1/13/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I think the whole argument that Flash has the most ubiquity is a bit of a myth.
Rocketboom has always been embedded Quicktime. They have a huge daily audience.
No one ever complains that they can't see the Quicktime video. Of
course they provide other formats too because some people prefer them.
a
unique situation. And I would bet that the reason RocketBoom doesn't
have any complaints is because they do offer multiple formats.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the whole argument
options via pop-up windows.
Your solution is just what I was thinking about.
Is the PHP script available?
Thanks...
joe
http://www.hotbizz.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the whole argument that Flash has the most ubiquity
--
From: Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 12, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlogging with Flash - nice pop-up generator!
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
The PHP script is really simple. If you have any basic scripting
experience it should be a cake-walk. I was going
Kind of weird since AOL already has media search with Singing Fish.
-Josh
On 1/10/06, Digital Buddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WSJ is reporting AOL's acquisition of Truveo. They came out of beta in
September of last year. Searching Vlog yields 1000+ posts.
--
Ted Tagami
tagami.com
U N I
Here's a suggestion...
You need contact info for the feed owner to notify them (allow owners
to claim their feed)... perhaps notify them that their feed will be
flagged as explicit and offer them a choice to provide a rating
category if they desire (PG, PG-13, R, X... whatever scale you want).
Categories based on tags maybe?
That is the Microformat way. Just tag it with a relTag.
-Josh
On 1/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Categories based on tags maybe?
On 1/10/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
categories... a full circle.
back in the day
maybe just allow folks to tag it not safe for work
a check box when submitting a feed.
-Josh
On 1/10/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be nice (if this is a favorable way to go) to use our own
ratings, and not be tied to choices big media made
On 1/10/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL
Different people have different needs. There will always be different
services to appeal to different people.
-Josh
On 1/10/06, Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with having one centralized leader for videoblogs is that
it would create a monopoly. It's better to have competition
You don't have to pay anything if you are satisfied with free services.
Let's look at it with an abbreviated example from the blogging world...
There's Blogger. Its free. Its pretty good. It does a lot of stuff
that works fine for a lot of people. But it doesn't include many
features that are
that's just not how the internet works. It is massive and distributed.
It is too large for any one entity to control or make entire sense of.
Not even Google.
What is going to happen with videoblogs, or video on the web, is that
there will be a lot of it and it will be everywhere. It is
very cool... although I already shelled out for the Flip4Mac Studio version which lets you edit and export WMV too.
However, I disabled the automatically play WMV files in Quicktime feature.
I wanted to make sure I was getting the same experience other users would get.
I can still open WMV in
yes, this is true.
this was out at Webzine.
-josh
On 1/10/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wordpress.com/
can someone confirm what seems to be true?
wordpress is now like blogger.com?
you can just sign up for a free account...and host video on it?
i just signed up...uploaed
haha, stick with typepad if it works for you.
-Josh
On 1/10/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, this is true.
this was out at Webzine.
okay...im behind the times.
im dumping Typepad.
Jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
http://www.momentshowing.net
http://getFireAnt.com
Flash is used by service providers... upload your video here types
of services.
This is fine, but for an independent who wants to post their own video
on the web, dealing with Flash is still for the most part too
expensive and too complicated. Flash MX 2004 Professional is not a
cheap program.
of available technologies.
sullOn 1/10/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flash is used by service providers... upload your video here typesof services.This is fine, but for an independent who wants to post their own videoon the web, dealing with Flash is still for the most part too
expensive
Yet again here's a Wordpress plugin for embedding Flash Video.
With this, all you do is upload your FLV, insert a simple tag in your
blog entry, and you're done. This is the most elegant implementation
of Flash Video for independent videobloggers I've seen yet.
doesn't remember)
... Richard
On 1/10/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
haha, stick with typepad if it works for you.
-Josh
On 1/10/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, this is true.
this was out at Webzine.
okay...im behind the times.
im dumping
definitely not the same company.
-Josh
On 1/7/06, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are bliptv.com and blip.tv the same company? I thought that bliptv.com had
an agreement with Sprint?
On 1/7/06, Jack Olmsted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been publishing video blog reports and photos
it does have mp3 audio codec.
When you compress your video, use custom settings and change the Audio
settings. You can select your Audio compression format and bitrate.
-Josh
On 1/7/06, gmjoyce_y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Andreas. I recently bought QTPro but it doesn't have the MP3
iPod will play mov and mp4. It depends more on the resolution and bitrate.
m4v is not actually anything other than an mp4 with h.264 codec, aac
audio, and specific resolution and bitrate settings optimized for
iPod. So really, m4v is a made up file extension. It should actually
be mp4, as that's
I'm thinking about this concept of Real People Network you've
created here, and I can't help but think what would happen if you
allowed more people to contribute interviews with Real People. They
would not have to be connected in some way with technology, just
interviews, conversation, oral
I mean, just edit the file extension, don't convert the file.
Rename the file so the extension is .mp4.
-Josh
On 1/4/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
change .m4v to .mp4 and I bet all will work right.
-Josh
On 1/4/06, John Mayes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Vloggers,Thanks
change .m4v to .mp4 and I bet all will work right.
-Josh
On 1/4/06, John Mayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Vloggers,Thanks for eveyones help
yesterday. I have installed the feed enclosure plugin and it
seems to be working great and it improved the reliability of the
feed. I'm not sure I
there's also this little gadget called a Sony PSP
And another called a Zen Vision:Micro...
And there are and will be plenty more.
Those of you going to CES, let's see if we can compile a list of
portable video players, their video specs, and prices. I bet there
will be several iPod
video with
their computer and then sync it to their phone for portable viewing.
-joshOn 1/3/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have mobile phones with video playback hit the market yet?On 1/3/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's also this little gadget called a Sony PSP
I think Yahoo! was dealt kind of a blow lately when MTV decided to go
with Microsoft as the partner for their MTV Urge Music and Video
Store.
Yahoo's offices are literally across the street from MTV in Santa
Monica. I bet they were pretty burned by that.
Regardless, I do think there is real
i doubt this is true... Mac OS X is based on UNIX.
So is Linux. In fact, many Linux programs will run on Mac OS X and
porting Linux to Mac is generally pretty easy (though sometimes not as
easy to go the other way if a Mac program has some Mac dependencies).
-Josh
.
On 1/3/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL
the power in Apple's hands for now I guess.On 1/3/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
yes, but generally they suck.
They are also mostly focused on streaming video (see: Verizon Vcast)
because it is easier to charge for. Phone companies don't make money
selling phones, they make it selling
Not underwhelmed, just unwilling to concede that Apple is the *only*
player out there.
There is more than Apple. Much more. I believe that video creators,
consumers, and participants should have choices. Let there be more
content, more creators, more devices, more software, more
marketplaces,
...video iPod.On 1/3/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get it? Why does this leave all the power in Apple's hands?
Because they have the Rokr phone? There are plenty of other services in
the mobile media market that have more penetration than Apple.
-Josh
On 1/3/06, Devlon
.
I will choose the path that leads to more innovation instead.
-Josh
On 1/3/06, avideye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not underwhelmed, just unwilling to concede that Apple is the *only*
player out
to rule them all solution will pan out. The iPod is definitely cool,
but its not the only game in town. Things are just getting warmed up.
-Josh
On 1/3/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not underwhelmed, just unwilling to concede that Apple
MovableType also works great as a single solution.
You can install this plugin that generates enclosures in your RSS feed
and you're good to go, no other third parties involved:
http://brandon.fuller.name/archives/hacks/mtenclosures/
-Josh
On 1/3/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does not use any third party services. They pay for hosting
themselves, which is not cheap though its certainly way less expensive
than it used to be a few years ago.
-Josh
On 1/3/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MovableType also works great as a single solution.
You can install
...
-rob
--
REELblogs.com
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:34:26 -0800
From: Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: more players other than iPod
yes, but generally they suck.
They are also mostly focused on streaming video (see: Verizon Vcast)
because
it is easier to charge
you're absolutely right. Technology is usually the least of any issue
when relating to innovation. More often its usually business,
politics, and social factors.
-Josh
On 1/3/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a good article in Wired a couple of issues back about why
there
Who says everything should be free (as in beer)?
If you want to do something, sometimes that requires an investment of
time/money.
Especially if you believe that the thing you're starting will actually
make money one day and you will be able to recoup your initial
investment.
-josh
On 1/3/06,
This may come off the wrong way, but I'm really glad you interviewed
so many women.
Whenever I go to any of these tech conferences there's a noticable
lack of women and I tend to find it rather shameful.
-Josh
On 1/3/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i just added this to vlogdir's
these tech conferences, so
we need to elevate those whose voices often aren't heard.
But still, I need to get you on tape one of these days, Josh, even
though you're a guy's guy ... :~)
jd
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This may come off
This group is mirrored with Google Groups which apparently has better
archive search:
http://groups.google.com/group/videoblogging
-Josh
On 1/2/06, monika_lyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another option is to use an aggregator. I use Sharp reader, you can
use any one you prefer. That way I
Stephanie,
Can you point me to any documentation on this secondary producer
clause and what it means?
I've been wondering about how sites like iFilm.com and YouTube.com
persist seemingly without liability even though they willfully display
content they have no right to broadcast (SNL clips and
haha, your mental image of Andrew Baron is pretty funny...
-josh
On 1/2/06, Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past four days, Amanda Congdon has been in my dreams five
times. (Don't worry, I'm not complaining... I think Amanda is clever,
beautiful and utterly hilarious). The other
here's andrew...
http://www.dembot.com/006223.html
-Josh
On 1/2/06, Joan Khoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm...
Funny, I imagined him tall (between 5 10 and 64), blonde with short hair,
average build. I also have no idea how he looks like. Are we completely off
the mark? Anyone? :)
Rocketboom uses MovableType.
A lot of people use Wordpress and it gives great results too.
-Josh
On 1/1/06, Misha Kleider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i would like to start up a fancy looking vlog. is movable type the format
to use or should i make my own set up starting from scratch? what
other blogging engines, like TypePad, allow you to reverse the order of
posts (ascending or descending order). BLogger is really limited when
it comes to customizations.
-Josh
On 12/31/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's a dumb hack:
suppress printing the date by
typically they play the videos much larger than their original
resolution, so some distortion is inevitable when viewed at that size.
-josh
On 12/31/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been testing Google Video some more.
So far, the video compression is really bad.
Also superceded by compression in Flash 8, but you need to upgrade
Flash plugin to view it.
-josh
On 12/31/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been testing Google Video some more.
So far, the
mpeg-4 is a container format. It can contain many different codecs.
What codec is the mpeg-4 you're working with?
Open the file in Quicktime (even if it doesn't play) and press Apple-i
for Get Info.
This should tell you the codec, among other things.
You may need a plugin of some sort to decode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might 3ivx be able to decode the file?
Harold
On 12/31/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mpeg-4 is a container format. It can contain many different codecs.
What codec is the mpeg-4 you're working with?
Open the file in Quicktime (even if it doesn't
get Flip4Mac Studio:
www.flip4mac.com
or popwire wmv export component:
http://www.popwire.com/product_info.php?cPath=1products_id=7
Flip4Mac is more expensive, but I highly recommend it. Excellent
product. Also allows you to import and edit WMV in Quicktime, iMovie,
Final Cut. Great for
You can do two pass compression without encoding once, then doing it again manually.
Just set the first pass settings, then set the second pass settings,
then leave the compressor on second pass and go to compress the movie.
Works the same except you don't have to go through all the steps again
Are you on Windows?
I wonder if you are having trouble playing those due to 3ivx?
-Josh
On 12/30/05, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quicktime 6 or 7, VLC, Mplayer, to name a few.
If the mp4 wont open in quicktime then its either corrupt or theres
something about the mp4 that isnt
right, it helps to pay attention to the subject line disregard my comment.
-Josh
On 12/30/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you on Windows?
I wonder if you are having trouble playing those due to 3ivx?
-Josh
On 12/30/05, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quicktime
Not to be a jerk here Devlon, and I think the MeFeedia re-vlog feature
is nice, but do we really need a message to this list everytime you
re-vlog something?
-Josh
On 12/30/05, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For your friends' sake...they might be trying to get a date.
I revlogged the Cell
...you know, one for a conversation.
But, your point is noted, I'll talk about cool video that I find the
old-fashioned way.
Apologies for the mefeedia spam to alland I hope my response isn't Jerky
;)
On 12/30/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to be a jerk here Devlon
Labels, schmabels...make some tech...make some tools. ;)
Totally agree with this.
-Josh
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
they can put ads around it too... though i don't think they have done
that yet I believe its on the roadmap.
-Josh
On 12/28/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Google modify video uploaded to their site?
Oh, and they also show previews of videos from the search results
pages... I guess that counts as a modification. They also modify the
size of the video and rescale to fit the browser window size if you
consider that a modification.
-Josh
On 12/28/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
That's true. Maybe one day it it'll be as easy and cheap to do a
video in a blog. While I'm throwing things out here...
What if you did TV show as a videoblog? I'm not talking about taking
a TV show and distributing it on the web or via iTunes. I mean, what
if you designed a TV like show as
as neato and whizbang as that sounds in terms of interactivity, its
not something that an individual can produce and distribute easily
without a highly technical skill set and expensive authoring tools at
their disposal.
I'm much more interested in the democratizing aspects that are enabled
due
I think people too often confuse the what is a videoblog question as
though it has something to do with the style of content (or the
contents of the content). I would say that videoblogging has nothing
to do with content and everything to do with medium.
videoblog = video + blog
so the question
or install this greasemoneky script which does all that for you and
provides a nice download link on the page so you can click and save
as
http://www.joshkinberg.com/blog/archives/2005/11/greased_google.php
-Josh
On 12/25/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ho, Ho, ho!
VIA:
The social experiences in each of these contexts you describe is very different.
The audio waveforms may not change, but your experience does.
-Josh
On 12/25/05, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the point - I'm justing trying to challenge it because I don't
ascribe to the
, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of sounding like a jerk, do you really think your site
gets enough traffic to provide a representative sample of anything?
Uh, yeah, that did sound pretty jerky.
A small sample
%3A//www.crooksandliars.com/
On Dec 24, 2005, at 4:28 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 12/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of sounding like a jerk, do you really think your site
gets enough traffic to provide a representative sample of anything?
Uh, yeah
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 12/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of sounding like a jerk, do you really think your site
gets enough traffic to provide a representative sample of anything?
Uh, yeah, that did sound pretty
FireAnt for Mac can play FLV, provided that the raw FLV file is
syndicated, not the SWF wrapper. FireAnt for Windows does not yet play
FLV, but it does play SWF. We are working on improving this.
I think there are many benefits to being able to download and cache
videos for local playback. This
Works fine in FireAnt on Windows. No problem.
Haven't tried on Mac yet.
-Josh
On 12/23/05, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
worked ok in itunes
On 12/23/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this feed crashed my ANT.
works on vlogdir's aggregator:
... as in.. it appeared as subscribed for 1 second, then disappeared, then fireANT shut itself down.WinXPANT v
1.0.1.28
On 12/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works fine in FireAnt on Windows. No problem.Haven't tried on Mac yet.-JoshOn 12/23/05, David Meade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: worked ok
301 - 400 of 700 matches
Mail list logo
