Has anyone used the AAC audio encoder for Avid Free DV? I have to use
this horrible software to get a mov produced. I am seriously buying
QuickTime, but haven't yet.
I don't see AAC listed in the audio encoding options and I've tried
several of th ones that are listed and sometimes I get
Welcome to the home stretch!
Vlogging dangerously challenge for Day 7: Dare another videoblogger,
by video, to vlog on a specific theme, topic, or style within the next
2 weeks (we all probably would like a less time-pressure deadline!).
Bonus: accept a dare from other videobloggers. Be sure to
is it just me, or does this smell like a bribe?
dmitry_veoh wrote:
Would anyone be available for some consulting work to help us spec out
changes in the system? Looking for 2 to 3 people or to form a video
blogger advisory group (5-10 people). If any of you are developers,
we are looking to
Not sure what it smells like but it sure stinks.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it just me, or does this smell like a bribe?
dmitry_veoh wrote:
Would anyone be available for some consulting work to
The only way to get access (that I know of) to the AAC codec on a PC is to purchase QuickTime Pro. Also, even when you purchase it, many PC apps don't show you all the QT export options. It seems you're usually best off making a DV-AVI file and then using QT to compress it.
That's what I've
Ditto. I dont know of any other way to use the AAC codec other than
having QT Pro. Your method though on a PC is correct.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way to get access (that I know of) to the AAC
No.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it just me, or does this smell like a bribe?
dmitry_veoh wrote:
Would anyone be available for some consulting work to help us spec out
changes in the system? Looking for 2 to 3 people or to form a video
how do we know the user posting it doesn't work for the company making
family Guy and this isn't just another method for them to get more
coverage..
Unless vSocial has a some form of licensing agreement to broadcast
Family Guy's content then they can only assume that they do not have
On 4/9/06, Daryl Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it that hard for a vlogger to include a plate at the end of each vlog
that gives credit to the author of the vlogger, and a symbol indicating it's
copyright status (trad. Or creative commons or otherwise)? And add a
link-back as well so
Hello,I've been following the various threads on this. And my take on it is thisThe big issue here revolves around Copyright, Copyright Infringement, the Creative Commons, Fair Use and reform of Copyright law.
The arguing has come close to turning into a flame war. (I know some will say
Hello Vloggers:
Despite all the helpful responses to my inquiry about converting my
movies into m4v format for downloading to a video iPod I am still having
troubles getting them recognized for downloading.
Using a Mac, I have converted .mov into .m4v. files showing the iTunes
icon. These
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:34:57 +0200, M. Mart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
icon. These .m4v files have been uploaded to my website's directory
(poetryvlog.com/movies/.m4v) but, instead of showing them, the
browser
gives the page cannot be found code 404 response. I can see them in
the
On 4/8/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any persons who work for Veoh or with Veoh (for pay or not)
manually input RSS feeds into the system?
Robert, I don't think that's the issue. The issue is the re-hosting,
not how many rss feeds they spider or who added them.
Peter
--
Hello Vloggers:
One important bit of information I forgot to mention is that when
uploaded to my website's directory the .m4v files are followed by
(protected). I have no idea why this is, but in must have something to do
with the problem.
Thanks again,
Michael Mart
www.poetryvlog.com
Thanks Michael and David.
Here's the list of audio encoding choices I have:
24-bit interger
32-bit floating point
32-bit integer
64-bit floating point
ALaw 2:1
Apple Lossless (I've had some people report that they can't hear audio
from this one)
IMA 4:1
MACE 3:1
MACE 6:1
QDesign Music 2 (this one
Title: .m4v problem resolved?
Hello Vloggers:
No sooner had I sent the last message here then it occurred to me that the problem might be with the hosting service. I called the help desk at godaddy.com and the young lady was very helpful and identified the problem as residing with them -
Hey,My daughter Lauren found this in the Sunday comics today: http://images.ucomics.com/comics/prc/2006/prc060409.gif-Verdi
-- Me: http://michaelverdi.comRD: http://evilvlog.comLearn to videoblog: http://freevlog.orgLearn to videoblog in person:
http://node101.org
SPONSORED
Peter Van Dijck wrote:
On 4/8/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any persons who work for Veoh or with Veoh (for pay or not)
manually input RSS feeds into the system?
Robert, I don't think that's the issue. The issue is the "re-hosting",
not how many
nice way to lighten the day, Michael! (they said vlog! they said vlog!)heeheeOn 4/9/06, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,My daughter Lauren found this in the Sunday comics today: http://images.ucomics.com/comics/prc/2006/prc060409.gif
-Verdi
-- Me: http://michaelverdi.comRD:
Soon it may become a household word.On 4/9/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice way to lighten the day, Michael! (they said vlog! they said vlog!)heehee
On 4/9/06, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,My daughter Lauren found this in the Sunday comics today:
On 4/9/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How the feeds got there is one of the issues.
Dmitri could have said yes, we spider, and we apologize. But instead he
told us directly that Veoh doesn't spider, and that each of his 1600 feeds
were entered manually. (!)
I think that might
Devlon wrote:
Any suggestions on which might be the best choice? They all look
pretty obscure to me :)
I've been in your exact situation. I was on Windows, using Adobe
Premiere for editing, and Avid Free DV for QuickTime conversion, looked
at Freevlog, didn't find any AAC
including RSS feeds is not a priblem at all. This is what RSS
syndication is intended for.
FireAnt, MeFeedia, Vlogdir and other sites utilize RSS syndication.
The issue is as Peter has stated, caching and rehosting videos without
permission -- making it seem as though people were members of the
On 4/9/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devlon wrote:
Any suggestions on which might be the best choice? They all look
pretty obscure to me :)
I've been in your exact situation. I was on Windows, using Adobe Premiere
for editing, and Avid Free DV for QuickTime conversion,
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:15:16 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True WMM does ok for vlog editing, but you are still stuck with an avi
that needs to go through Avid to get to mov, no?
The easy solution is to export an AVI from WMM and use QT Pro to export a
MOV. I don't know if it's just
I think copyright is only one part of the problem here. The bigger
problem in my eyes is that by Veoh caching and rehosting videos
without permission they are making it seem as though all these
vloggers are members of the Veoh community, agreeing to Veoh's terms
of service, when this is not the
AAC is usually called mpeg4 audio in those lists... but I don't see
it there anyway.
-josh
On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:15:16 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True WMM does ok for vlog editing, but you are still stuck with an avi
that
Let's keep in mind that this is hardly the first time that sites have
stolen or hijacked others' videoblogs without permission, in fact
this is at least the third occasion that I can recall. The big
difference here is that Dmitry and his team, while we may not have
liked their initial actions,
Devlon wrote:
On 4/9/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweet! This is exactly what I've been looking for Charles. Thanks.
As for the audio quality when run through Flash transcoding, put on
headphones and judge for yourself.
http://chope.blip.tv/file/875
On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:15:16 +0200, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True WMM does ok for vlog editing, but you are still stuck with an avi
that needs to go through Avid to get to mov, no?
The easy solution is to export an AVI from WMM
Hehehe, that's funny. And awesome!
I told my friend that I love vlogging the other day and he thought I
said flogging. Maybe this comic (along with education) will help.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Soon it may become a household word.
On 4/9/06,
On 4/9/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AAC is usually called mpeg4 audio in those lists... but I don't see
it there anyway.
Cool, good to know thanks. But agreed, it isn't on the list.
-josh
On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006
(a) Yes or no (and only yes or no), have any persons who work for Veoh
or with Veoh (for pay or not) manually input RSS feeds into the system?
I don't see why this question would matter. People manually input RSS
feeds into any aggregator site or feed directory such as FireAnt,
MeFeedia,
On 4/9/06, littleblueriver7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehehe, that's funny. And awesome!
I told my friend that I love vlogging the other day and he thought I
said flogging. Maybe this comic (along with education) will help.lol, um, no flogging is much different, but just as
On 4/9/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/9/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:AAC is usually called mpeg4 audio in those lists... but I don't seeit there anyway.
Cool, good to know thanks.But agreed, it isn't on the list.That's correct but the only way to get access to it on a PC
agreed.afterall, mefeedia spiders feeds and has thousands of feeds now and is an excellent source for vlogs because of it.despite this, i chose a different approach for vlogdir. its community driven directory. people add their vlogs, get proper attribution and can also remove the entry if
On 4/9/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) Yes or no (and only yes or no), have any persons who work for Veoh
or with Veoh (for pay or not) manually input RSS feeds into the system?
I don't see why this question would matter. People manually input RSS
feeds into any aggregator
Correct Josh. And I agree, that is a very relevant concern.
And Sull, yeah, I completely agree, spidering in the case of creating an index in one use. Spidering is like a hammer, if you use it to drive nails in to build a house that's one thing, if you use it to bust the lock off someone's
I love it -
funny!
Cheers,
Monique Daniellehttp://www.vlogchallenge.com - This
Week's Challenge: Dangerhttp://www.vlogdiva.com -
This Weeks Video: Networking Tips
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
robert a/k/a r wrote:
Are
you comfortable with not knowing how the feeds got into Veoh's system?
How they got the feeds is relevant given what they did with
them. If all the feeds had been entered in by their owners, there would
be no controversy at all.
The picture that is being painted
Helo Josh,Just to address one very very specific thing that you said. (And not trying to address everything you said.)The HTTP protocol has a way of tell things not to cache something. HTTP has a no-cache header for this.
(Again I know people will probably very passionately NOT like what I'm
I just noticed Om has posted on his blog, the last link is to another of his posts (Its A Splog Planet) which is an interesting read on the situation.
http://gigaom.com/2006/04/09/veoh-vs-video-bloggers/>
On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Veoh could argue that part of
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:23:15 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now please note that I do NOT know if any vlogger is using HTTP
no-cache
header or not. And I do NOT how if Veoh is respecting the HTTP
no-cache
header or not. Just trying to give everyone a
Hello,On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:23:15 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now please note that I do NOT know if any vlogger is using HTTP
no-cache header or not.And I do NOT how if Veoh is respecting the HTTP no-cache header
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:40:49 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTTP no-cache header has gained a legal context also. I remember
reading about multiple court cases where this was perpetuated; both in
Canadian and USA court. (I don't have any links, but I'm pretty
On 4/9/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another
point I say this knowing that I'll probably get flamed for it, but
I think it's important to not to ignore points and try to silence them
just because we don't like hearing them (After all, if this
would go to
Uh, dude, this is so far off the subject.I'm not talking about browser caching.I'm talking about downloading videos from one server to another and then redistributing them as your own. Different subject entirely and not one having to do with HTTP protocol.
-JoshOn 4/9/06, Charles Iliya
Hello Andreas,On 4/9/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:40:49 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The HTTP no-cache header has gained a legal context also.I remember
reading about multiple court cases where this was perpetuated; both in
Hello Stephanie,Like I said in my original post, that you replied to, I was ONLY talking caching. Just caching and nothing else.I was NOT trying to address any of that other stuff that you said. And I was NOT trying to say that the only thing they did was caching.
Sorry for the confusion.See
Hello Josh,The HTTP no-cache header does NOT just pertain to browser caching. It's also used by transparent web caches, and other web caching systems. Caching, on the web, takes place at all sorts of places and on all sorts of levels. (You're ISP is very very likely doing alot of caching, and
Hehehehe - sound like something that ought to be added to the wiki, here:
http://www.voxmedia.org/w/index.php?title=Videoblogging_Promotionaction=edit >
XOXOX,
Jan
--
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound
http://the-hold.blogspot.com - poetry
iSquint!
Not sure who asked for a tool that would encode for the ipod on mac,
but iSquint is teh bomb.
It'll do any QT format... and I think they were working on WMV though
it's been a while.
But it'll do any format that will open in QT and convert it to
either. mp4 or .m4v. It'll even
On 4/8/06, hpbatman7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't get and maybe someone can explain this to me in a simplemanner, (I am not a real tech guy, I know enough and am learning buton a thread like this I realize how much I don't know.) I put myvideos out, what is to stop someone from putting
But Charles they aren't caching. Caching is keeping a copy of an object to make new requests for it faster. They are hosting derivative works. The work was downloaded. Transcoded to a new format. And that completely new format is HOSTED (not cached) at a new location.
Requests for this new
Thanks for the reply David..a well thought out explanation.I
appreciate it..and more importantly I understand better now...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4/8/06, hpbatman7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't get and maybe someone
Hello David,The point you made about requests for the new (cached/re-hosted) object having nothing to do with requests for the original work is a very good point. And one I don't think Veoh can argue away. (I even made the same point somewhere in this huge collection of e-mail.)
But, I don't
I have two feeds, Cirne (http://www.cirne.com/vlog) and Tech Alley
(http://techalley.cirne.com). I have claimed Cirne. I asked them to
remove Tech Alley, which they did. Simple.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My simple question...
my answer is this i just havent had the time yet,
but let me ask you something
why shuld i have to op out of something ive never joined?
let me ask this by have my shit on his site does that make my stuff on blip
less valuable? will blip lose money becuse they are not my only sorce of
vidos on
My understanding is all it takes is an email to them to have yourself
removed. That takes all but 2 minutes. So...why havent you done that?
Yes. I agree that you shouldnt have to.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait.
You're only 27?
Punk kid, what do you know.
Sorry, my bad sense of humor is going to get me in trouble. :)
LOL!
-Mike
On Apr 8, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The thing with Veoh is only the latest example of something that has
been pretty rampant and very troubling with
Well...actually Eric. My question was to those with feeds there that
are still unclaimed. With all the hoopla that happened yesterday, I am
curious why there are still unclaimed feeds.
Thanks
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well I guess I havent taken any action yet because I for one want to give them a chance to fix the problem.As for wha VEOH's done in the past ... there's been a few full appologies, and a promise to make it right. I'm not sure what more we could possibly ask for.
I'm not going to 'claim' it
Well...I dont really see what they did as a problem. I am pretty sure
that their spidering or non-spidering does exactly what it was
intended to do and is working quite well. I dont see it as a renegade
process that's gone HAL on everyone. That's another discussion though.
Thanks for your
When I said dragging culture back out of the darknets and onto the
open web this is hardly what I though. But heh if you want to try and
run a business on copyright infringement go right a head...
...get yourself sued.
This particular veoh user, that's just mad, crazy copyright
And living in a cabin in Montanna.
:)
On Apr 8, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Enric wrote:
News of privacies death has been exaggerated; it's alive and well.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?
I'm not
I'm going to disagree to agree.
Actually banning a user's feed is not just a start it's the
solution... feed and user account mechanism are I think more than
enough of a trusted unit to discourage abuse.
Exibits
Exibit A... I thought technoratti tags would encourage spam... little
did I
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Please, its dead easy to recognize where most of the infringement
occurs and to cut it down. Simply banning the accounts of those users
would likely eliminate much of the infringing cases.
You could also sample a user's first several
Videoblogging Week 2006 has been fun, and I even purchased a camcorder (my first) during this week. (I expect to receive it this week, so that I may continue videoblogging.) I only wish I could get Technorati to pick up my tags...Oh, well...(More honest response: F*ck!!!)
Technorati's not
On 4/8/06, Peter Van Dijck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is an acceptable response from Veoh? I'm throwing this out for
comments here.
Here's one I personally could live with: this kind of re-hosting
should be opt-in.
That would mean that:
1) They remove ALL videos they've spidered and
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Adam Quirk wrote: On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The top viral clip on vSocial has over 20 million remote views. Its a clip from Family Guy ("Peanut BUtter Jelly Time"). It should be removed of course, it is not in the interest of the
that sounds like a very reasoned response, Jay.i look forward to seeing how this unfolds. if Veoh holds up to their statement that they will do what it takes to make things right and we agree that the right thing to do would be to remove all videos/feeds marked as unclaimed feeds, then there is
Well Charles, I'm not Jim Carrey by any means, and I'm not even consistently in good humor -- but sometimes I try. Example:
http://www.somethingthathappened.com/2006/04/something-that-happened-on-final-day.html
Harold J. Johnson
http://SomethingThatHappened.com
On 4/6/06, Charles Iliya
On Apr 8, 2006, at 4:40 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
This is a strange argument and my feelings on copyrights are still
developing but have changed alot over the last year while watching
everything that is going on.
Remember when iFilm was the biggest video website on the net? Not
only
... andthen we'll get over it... in a year or two.haha. right Michael! like how we got over it with television. thank god we've moved on from america's funniest home videos to american idol. what a relief! we've moved on from spectacle!
On 4/9/06, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr
Hi Guys,
I want to say thanks to the following folks for entering our first
VlogChallenge: Josh Wolf, Deirdré Straughan, Monika, UnzappedTV/Jason,
Bev Sykes and Jan. The winners are announced in the 'Slammin Stuff'
section of our site.
FYI - we had 146 unique visitors to the site last week. I
Lately the sound doesn't work on any quicktime movies
that I upload to my blip.tv vlog. However I can upload those same quicktime
videos to my servers and they play just fine on my site.
This is racking my brain, I can't figure why or how
that could happen. Got any ideas?
CheersMonique
Let's have a straight-up conversation, here. Direct conversation. For
example, Halcyon (screen-name) forwards messages from you however we do
not know if he is an affiliated party, please advise.
Since my integrity was questioned (not maliciously, just
questioned)...I wanted to explain my
Hey Monique,
It sounds like you're having difficulty with the Flash versions of
your videos. You can turn off Flash playback here:
http://www.blip.tv/prefs/flash/ and everything should go back to normal.
(The reason why this happens is that the Flash transcoding software we
and everyone else
Did you, either manually or through an automated manner, enter or
submit any of the unclaimed rss feeds into Veoh's listings?
A yes or no will be fine.
Thanks
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's have a
No. Parallels Workstatoin 2.1 uses the Virtualization hardware that
is a part of the Core Duo Yonah processor to accomplish hardware
speed in the OS X Virtual environ thanks to Intel's new architecture.
Users of Parallels' solution report they perceive it to be just as
fast as the native
Hey Mike,
Thanks for the response - now that is excellent
support!
How to I turn off the flash? Cheers Monique
Danielle http://www.vlogchallenge.com - This
Week's Challenge: Resurrection http://www.vlogdiva.com - This Weeks Video:
Networking Tips
Hey Monique,
It's my pleasure to help! :)
You can turn off Flash by unchecking Use Flash Playback in your
Playback Preferences, which are available at:
http://www.blip.tv/prefs/flash/
Yours,
Mike
Co-founder, blip.tv
PS - You may be interested in joining the blip-users group at
yes. so, everyone chill cut back on the multitude of threads about veoh, please.sullOn 4/9/06, Jay dedman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 4/8/06, Peter Van Dijck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is an acceptable response from Veoh? I'm throwing this out for comments here. Here's one I personally
reminder... (not directed to anyone in particular)
remember RO? he put up videoblogging-universe.com and a few cool features for vloggers.
this is spidering and re-hosting 'previews' transcoded to flv or swf or mp4 (depends).
this is also how it is done right!
but how does this play into
also should know that you can contact blip directly or use their users group.they do respond to support request here but nobody should 'expect' support here from blip.luckily, they kick ass and have strong presence here but all blip users should keep this in mind.
sullOn 4/9/06, Monique
Monique,
Thanks for updating us on the challenge. I'm a dork and didn't submit
(I've been getting home really late at night these past couple of
days).
Congrats to all the contestants and the winners!
On 4/9/06, gottadiva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going forward I will refrain from regular posts
Vlogdir hates me. I think you deleted my account or something.
Damn you...
;)
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(which is why vlogdir doesnt work that way).
sull
On 4/9/06, David Howell [EMAIL
Hi Sull,
I wasn't expecting support from blip here, just hoping
a fellow vlogger could help me out.
Call me dense, but I didn'trealize that they had
support
Cheers
Monique
Subject: Re: [videoblogging]
Re: WTF - Sound Doesn't Play on my Blip.tv Videos?
also should know that you can
Hey Monique,
You can e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your question any time, post it to
the blip-users group, IM me on AOL instant messenger (I'm on as
mikehudack) or call me at 646-827-9773 (I'm in the eastern time zone).
We've got lots of support! :-D
Yours,
Mike
Co-founder, blip.tv
--- In
You can e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your question any time,
post it tothe blip-users group, IM me on AOL instant messenger (I'm on
as"mikehudack") or call me at 646-827-9773 (I'm in the eastern time
zone).
I can vouch for the fact that Mike is more accessible than any support
person
Got it.
So like...now I gotta give you flowers now?
*chuckle*
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
searched for 'tao'.
returned this:
http://vlogdir.com/permalink/822
On 4/9/06, David Howell [EMAIL
91 matches
Mail list logo
