On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
My friend, there is more evidence (physical, scientific, literary,
historical, etc) to establish a young Earth than there are evidences for
the existence of Egyptian dynasties, let alone their supposed age.
***What a
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
This will be my last response on this subject
***Not quite the case, is it? Jesus says let your Yes be Yes. In your
case on this thread it is yes, but
Uhh, didn't you say you weren't going to comment any more on this subject
lest you get all riled up???
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not familiar with the Bhagava Gita so I will not comment on this.
But I only have one question. How do you
I'll try one more time although there is little hope for one as
radicalised as you. Take a lesson from the high priests who would not
believe Jesus' message even when he rose from the dead but would rather
bribe the guards to stop others believing the truth. Don't try to
destroy evidence like
That isn't fair because... he said he wouldn't respond any more on this
subject.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:24 AM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
I'll try one more time although there is little hope for one as
radicalised as you. Take a lesson from the high priests who would not
believe
We are talking rational history here, right?
Google hits for
historicity of Bhagavad Gita : 3
historicity of Jesus : about 214,000
Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad Gita,
do you really believe these are historical accounts? Their answer is
basically no,
Jones,
I don't understand the basis for this conclusion. It is well known that
muons catalyze fusion to a reasonably high rate and that the primary reason
is Coulombic screening to a much smaller inter-nuclear separation due to
the fact that the muon orbital radius is so much smaller than the
Bob,
In general- the conclusion is that DDLs should operate to enhance fusion due to
proximity effects, would only be valid if they formed as molecular pairs
correct? Apparently, since we do not see gammas which would indicate fusion,
the DDL does not form as pairs, and is only an atomic
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting
ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned
The Biblical stuff has other venues.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
posting which I think is
The particle conservation rules involving overall conservation of *baryon*
number and the conservation of *lepton* number. If a lepton in input into
the reaction, then a lepton must come out of the reaction as an output, The
same is true from baryon conservation. How are these interaction laws
this thread reminds me of this scene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpkWT5voTSE
harry
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Biblical stuff has other venues.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey guys is
If you take a neon sign transformer,(NST) and light a neon with it; then film
that neon discharge with a digital camera, you get what you see, a constant
neon discharge. The camera takes 30 pictures/sec and each picture shows the
neon discharge. The camera is timed to the source 60 hz frequency
I've been out of this thread on religion and radiometric dating, but a certain
fellow can't take no for an answer.
Regarding Axil's speculation, he still needs to explain how his nanostructure
can perform what he speculates it can perform at high temps. I know I keep
harping on this
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating temperature were
the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat is produced. That
range is between about 400C to 1100C. This is the subcritical temperature
range where energy must be input to pump the reaction. In order to
produce
From Axil:
...
This lack of control has never been solved and is one reason why Rossi's
reactor has not been certified and released as a safe product that does
not explode.
I agree.
Regardless of what theory might best explain the excess heat being generated
from Rossi's
This may be an opinion not held by many, but I believe that DGT has solved
the control problem. This is a fallout of how the two different pumping
methods work.
It seems like a simple matter to add a thermostat to the design. The max
safe temperature is reached as determined by the thermostat,
On Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:43 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why would you assume that the investors would have done lousy due diligence?
I never assume lousy due diligence. But it is fair to wonder how much diligence
they did do.
It's indisputable that there is 'dumb
As far as I can see there is nothing _but_ dumb money out there. Let me
define what I mean:
I know of at least one technology that has, since 2009, been waiting on
nothing more than about $10M dollars to reduce civilization's ecological
footprint by at least a factor of 2 while increasing
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem is the noise. Noise affects the FWHM of the system and
normally getting this noise low enough so that the FWHM is smaller than
1keV (to get some resolution of low keV photons) requires cooling the
sensor
Although I agree with your general premise that things do not add up with
BLP - a reasonable explanation for owning this facility - and it being on
the market now could be fairly mundane.
IIRC Mills bought a large aerospace facility maybe a decade ago, for pennies
on the dollar (probably it was
Greetings Vortex-L,
Courtesy of Alain Cortmeurs website:
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/news/index.php/News/2-Boeing-patent-electric-propulsion-system-fan-for-planes-considering-LENR-powerin/
The Boeing patent application was published May 2014..not sure if this was
covered at Vortex
Ad Astra,
Greetings Vortex,
Not sure how many Vortex folks googled: Axil s email:JANAP128...hmm.
Axil is an enigma. Kudos to him.
I am a Villanova economist...not spoiled by Einstein dogma...and Scientific
Theory.
Grins,
Ron Kita,Chiralex
Doylestown PA.a close friend of the late Gene Mallove.
My
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Although I agree with your general premise that things do not add up with
BLP - a reasonable explanation for owning this facility - and it being on
the market now could be fairly mundane.
Google maps shows this to be the
In reply to James Bowery's message of Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:34:24 -0500:
Hi,
Indeed. Humans are very risk averse. They are willing to invest large sums in
things they are tried and true, even if the promised return is only low, but
very unwilling to invest in something completely new, even if the
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 12:40:38 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I guess that spin energy is strongly associated with angular momentum while
thermal energy tends to be considered associated with linear momentum.
Off centre linear momentum is angular momentum.
Regards,
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 13:15:37 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
That is the model that I try to understand Axil. But I do not believe that an
isolated single moving particle can emit thermal energy directly.
...unless it happens to be in a magnetic field, in which case it
just booeing trying to avoid a troll patent his plane electric fan used
with LENR...
more surprising is this finding in Germany
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/555-Researchers-from-German-University-and-Aerospace-Agency-investigate-LENR-with-Co/?postID=1057#post1057
a modest
Thanks for the link.
This seems like a silly patent, putting a fan in a tube has a century of prior
art -- Am I missing something?
From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 1:36 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Boeing- LENR Patent Application Jet Aircraft
This experiment is abysmal. What a waste of time and effort by highly skilled
guys who were inquisitive enough to try something.
A few hours consultation with an LENR expert and they could have possibly seen
something interesting on merely the switch to better electrodes.
Why platinum
they seems to add a sound attenuation by smart positioning of multiple rows
of blades; with good shape
2014-08-17 0:33 GMT+02:00 Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net:
Thanks for the link.
This seems like a silly patent, putting a fan in a tube has a century of
prior art -- Am I missing
Its worse than that. I've seen Exxon blow $600M on a competing technology
that had far less to offer under anything resembling due diligence. The US
government has blown billions on the Tokamak over a period of decades
despite the founders of the program denouncing it. Then there is the Space
Vortex James and mixent.
I think you are right in one regard. We are in a rent seeking society. Why?
The reason is that we have indoctrinated ourselves to rely on stats,
computers and academic wisdom. That is a problem my grand children's
children will have to deal with. Credit score is important
Didn't you say you weren't going to be commenting on this subject any
longer?
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been out of this thread on religion and radiometric dating, but a
certain fellow can't take no for an answer.
Regarding Axil's
Axil:
Why doesn't it shut down when the metal matrix melts? Is it because the
reaction moves more to the interior of the metal matrix where it is still
solid? The key to stopping such an activity would be to add a nitrogen
epitaxial layer.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Axil Axil
But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the one
guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this
subject any longer. Well, other than the fact that he hasn't kept his
word, it would be a good plan to have the discussion on this thread.
On Sat,
But Axil my friend, nickel nanostructures such as your nanowires, nanoantennas,
nanotips, etc will begin to sinter at temps lower than 400C. They are gone at
400C-1000C. If they are the NAE as you theorize, they are at best one-time use
NAE, which would mean that the reactor can not be
James, Please elaborate on this technology. If it is enormously profitable as
you claim, I might be able to integrate this with my wave power to produce
food. We need cheap food here in the Philippines to feed an exponentially
growing population.
Jojo
- Original Message -
Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore. If you
are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem. I am sick
of your bullying and attitude as if you are the boss here. GROW UP.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Kevin O'Malley
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore.
If you are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem.
***bullshit. Your point number 5 had nothing to do with religious
There are two types of nano-antennas that can produce the magnetic force
that LENR drives off of, the nickel nanowire is the first type and
the second is mainly hydrogen nanoparticles that condense out of the
cooling plasma and possibly some aluminum from Rossi's vaporizing primary
heater. This
Life is too short and I have other things more important than dealing with your
chip on your shoulder childish attitude. The record shows that you have
insulted and have been childish to many people here before I showed up. Here
are just a sample of people you picked fights with.
1. Peter
At 20,000C, aluminum will vaporize and when this aluminum plasma cools,
this LENR active aluminum dust will form.
***I don't think you commented on my proposal that such cooling could form
a relative BEC or Fermiion Condensate. Even though the absolute
temperature is well above what one might
If you're the child of God you claim to be, you could go through every
single one of those supposed misplaced insults and hold my feet to the
fire, justifying them or apologizing, if appropriate. If it was truly
important to you. But you didn't do it at the time, and your bringing it
up now
For example, DGT uses a spark to produce nanoparticle based nano-antennas,
A BEC will form after the temperature of the plasma produced by the spark
get to a temperature where the nanoparticles condense out of the plasma.
All kinds of elements will form this nanoparticles. At that time, the SPPs
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Life is too short and I have other things more important than dealing with
your chip on your shoulder childish attitude. The record shows that you
have insulted and have been childish to many people here before I
Have I insulted Peter Gluck on this thread? Nope. So what's yer problem?
Log onto the threads where I have insulted these people and see for
yourself their own attitudes.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Life is too short and I have other things
Oh, and, when you do that... make sure you don't just jump in out of
context. Read the whole thread. I know that is hard for you, but you have
made your bed so it's time to sleep in it. I doubt you will do the
honorable thing.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Kevin O'Malley
*If on the other hand, the NAE is just a simple blob of nickel spherical
nanoparticle, then that's different (note that a blob of nickel
nanoparticle is not a nanostructure per se. It does not have a structure
such as a nanowire, a nanotip, a nanomesh, etc., it's just a spherical
blob.) If the
Sorry my friend, I find your writing style tedious and long-winded and very
difficult to understand.
***Gee, wouldn't that qualify as one of those insults that you so
grievingly take fault from me? What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the
gander.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Jojo Iznart
Nickel is usually NOT changed to another element through transmutation
***But the Nickel at the end of the nano antenna, within the sniper scope
of the target, that would be subject to transmutation, right? That would
explain why there is so little transmutation with such a high energy
reaction.
3. This would explain why there would be a need to reheat the hotcat.
Rossi needs to reheat the hotcat to break off some more nanoparticles to
serve as new NAE sites as the old blobs stick to each other and stops
becoming active NAE sites.
the Ni/H reactor must be heated above the curie
Axil being anonymous is to me a major problem and a good reason why people
should treat his theories with skepticism.
Why? simply because Axil does not loose anything if his outrageous theories are
exposed. Normally, a person proposing a theory would have his reputation
invested with the
Prove that your resources were spent instead of just annoying everyone by
complaining about his anonymity. Your test is anonymous.
2014-08-17 0:31 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
Axil could be proposing useless rabbit hole ideas which would cause
people to go down the wrong
If you take a look at this table from ICCF-17 data from DGT, you will see
no nickel transmutation.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nickel is usually NOT changed to another element through transmutation
***But the Nickel at the end of the nano
the second column is before the run, the first is after run. I looks like
nickel has increased.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
If you take a look at this table from ICCF-17 data from DGT, you will see
no nickel transmutation.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014
But my friend, how does the nickel nanoantenna survive the temps. Even if you
say the actual LENR reaction is remote from the nanoantenna, you still have
very high temps at the nanoantenna site itself. This mechanism can not be
correct for this simple reason.
Not to bring a religious topic
I wrote:
On occasion I've looked for the Piantelli anecdote, which I read somewhere,
but I haven't succeeded yet in tracking it down.
Apparently I didn't look too far. There are several references to his
using a cloud chamber. Here is a brief description from Steven Krivit
(search for cloud
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil being anonymous is to me a major problem and a good reason why
people should treat his theories with skepticism.
***Skepticism is good. Where are your theories we can treat with such
skepticism. How do we
What kind of proof do you require?
I have since dismantled my lab since I am now busy with my wave project; but I
still have the Flat Plat Heat Exchanger contraption that I built to try to
replicate the experiment. Do you want me to send it to you?
If I can prove this, will you shut up? and
Axil followed suit with elaborate explanations of carbon nanoparticles
causing LENR, etc. etc.
See
Fusion by Pseudo-Particles
Part 1
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf
Part 2
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf
Part 3
My friend, this is your proof I've studied these docs before.
These are all speculations. No proof here.
But In fact, I've done more than you to try replicate some of these ideas.
I've actually built a contraption for replicating some of it. Much more than I
can say for you. Please
Not to bring a religious topic in again, but your theory is like Darwinian
Evolution Theory.
***That is precisely what you did, bring up religion again. At least
you're on a different thread this time.
It does not matter unless Darwinists can explain the Abiogenesis problem on
how life can
Why not send it to Axil, since you have such a huge Axil to grind. Maybe
he can make hay out of the experiment where you could not.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of proof do you require?
I have since dismantled my lab since I am now
I have posted more than once, that if the control system of the reactor
keeps the reactor temperature under the sintering temperature of the nickel
nanostuctures, the nickel particles will be safe.
Is that hard to understand?
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
So you're pissed that Axil was an advocate of some theory that you tried to
replicate and failed to do so. How is that Axil's fault? Lots of
experiments have had replication failures, is it the fault of the person
who suggests it's worth replicating?
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Jojo
Keeping the reactor temperature under control is an engineering issue. It
is the job of the reactors control system to regulate the reactor's
temperature.
A failure of that control system will cause the reactor to meltdown.
Do you understand this?
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Jojo Iznart
That part I understand my friend, what I don't understand is how you can even
begin to claim that. Is the mouse operating at under 300C? Because that is
the beginning sintering point of nickel nanoparticles. (In fact, there is
reason to believe sintering occurs at temps lower than this.)
Yes my friend, I understand this. But is the control system regulating the
reactor to operate below the sintering temperature of the nanoantennas? Quite
obviously it is not, so I am befuddled why you would bring this up.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To:
This nickel preservation question is part of the design of the Ni/H reactor
as Rossi has let slip. Rossi says that his reactor is now running at 1000C
He said in the past that he used bumpy microparticles.
Ask Rossi why his nickel does not sinter. By the way, it does not sinter,
On Sun, Aug 17,
Scan your lab notes and show it to us. Some data would be nice too.
2014-08-17 0:49 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message is eligible
for Automatic Cleanup! (jojoiznar...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule
*Quite obviously it is not,*
How can you say this?* I know, you just wiggle your lips. *
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes my friend, I understand this. But is the control system regulating
the reactor to operate below the sintering
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6id5Hf-xMWOYXVjekJCN1ZkQk0/edit?pli=1
see slide 30
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
On occasion I've looked for the Piantelli anecdote, which I read
somewhere, but I haven't succeeded yet in tracking it
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6id5Hf-xMWOYXVjekJCN1ZkQk0/edit?pli=1
See a picture of piantelli's nano antennas. I wonder if this conforms with
your idea of a nano antenna.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*Quite obviously it is not,*
How can you say
Actually my friend, if the hotcat is operating the way I speculate, Rossi does
not have to worry about the sintering. Since, the NAE would be floating blobs
of nickel nanoparticles which may be partially melted. He needs to use bumpy
sea-urchin microparticles precisely for the reason I
Fine, I will dig up my equipment from storage and send you pictures.
But what's in it for me? What do I get for my effort and wasted time? Are you
willing to back up your challenge to me?
How about making this interesting. If I can show proof that I spent money,
time and effort replicating
So, we're getting personal now, eh?
Please divert your efforts into answering my objection.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Quite obviously it is not,
I've seen this doc before my friend. I've studied Piantelli's patents before.
This has nothing to do with Rossi's mechanism.
Quite honestly my friend, you have a penchant for taking data from various
sources and apply it out of context as support for your theory. You call it
connecting the
78 matches
Mail list logo
