But what is the likelihood that Peter would get permission to use a beam
line for that debunked/junk science called cold fusion? Probability is very
low. and if the hot fusion group has any say, the probability is zero.
-mi
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday,
1) so they are wearing jackets in the warehouse; in many tilt-up industrial
parks like this, a small (front) section is walled off and made into offices
and *is* heated, whereas the large warehouse section is not heated to save on
heating costs.
2) Geez, I think there is more than one large
If you know anything about engineers... good engineers... they are real anal
about details, and the fact that all the labels on things all being in the
same orientation is not strong evidence of the same container.
This certainly is an interesting set of pictures, and raises questions in my
mind,
This is comical! Ya gotta laugh.
So, did Rossi confirm what the Collective seems to be converging to???
Y Thnk!!!
BTW, Thanks go to Patrick Ellul for taking the direct route, and just asking
the horse!
Good job Patrick!
-Mark
From: Robert Leguillon
the focus.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
ChemE:
This forum really frowns on people who don't use their real names.
snip
-mark
appreciate all of the great ideas exchanged in this forum. The
topic needs the focus.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
ChemE:
This forum really frowns on people who don't use their real names.
snip
-mark
Welcome Bruno!
Hey, Vorts, has the Collective ever had the contributions from an economist
before?
Anyway, Bruno, thanks for your comments, and I would encourage you to
analyze this from the perspective that it is *real*, that it is an entirely
new type of nuclear/chemical reaction, and will
Jones,
You missed your calling...
:-)
-m
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 7:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi selling Licenses?
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Like,
My understanding concurs with Robin's, that they need to be in-phase.
However, as Axil pointed out in his reference to a PhysOrg article which
states:
These polaritons overwhelmingly prefer to march in step with each other,
entangling themselves quantum mechanically.
Not sure if that experiment
%E2%80%93positron_annihilation
AG
On 1/16/2012 6:08 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Aussie Guy summarizing Rossi's interview...
512 keV 180 deg Gammas have been detected
180 degs relative to what?
-Mark
For those not following LENR for more than about the last year, the name
Bockris might be new. He did a considerable amount of excellent LENR
research in the 90s, and eventually faced several 'official' inquiries at
the insistence of colleagues. none of which found any wrong-doing or bad
science.
ChemE:
This forum really frowns on people who don't use their real names.
snip
-mark
, unencumbered adoption of LENR, let's hope
that energy production becomes easy and transmutation of heavier elements
proves to be difficult or impossible.
Eric
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
AussieGuy wrote:
Transmutation of elements via
AussieGuy wrote:
Transmutation of elements via the FPE may replace mining.
It'll do more than that. it'll kill the entire precious metals business
which has been a foundation for countries' *monetary systems*. What affect
that will have on economic systems, and countries, is probably not
proves to
be difficult or impossible.
Eric
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
AussieGuy wrote:
“Transmutation of elements via the FPE may replace mining.”
It’ll do more than that… it’ll kill the entire precious metals business which
has
Robin wrote:
There have been gas turbine powered race cars, so the response can't have
been too bad.
And Jay Leno builds turbine powered motorcycles... I WANT ONE
It uses the small Allison 250 jet turbine engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvIi17by5W0
Aussie Guy summarizing Rossi's interview...
512 keV 180 deg Gammas have been detected
180 degs relative to what?
-Mark
-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Mock paper
Well, at least Santilli is a degreed physicist with considerable credentials
from places like MIT and Harvard; the following Bio is from his
Hi Peter,
Sorry to dig up old, unpleasant memories, however, *IF* he has a better
model for hadrons, should he not get credit?
His side of the issue with scientific journals is explained here:
http://www.scientificethics.org
particularly with World Scientific, this page:
to his complaint against Infinite Energy is dead.
Harry
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Peter,
Sorry to dig up old, unpleasant memories, however, *IF* he has a
better model for hadrons, should he not get credit?
His side of the issue
I'd prefer to use a line from the album, 'Hotel California' by The Eagles...
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave!
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Vorl Bek [mailto:vorl@antichef.com]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 1:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
Here is one tidbit that seems to indicate it might be...
-m
==
Santilli writes:
In 1996 I submitted to International Journal of Modern Physics D paper
[35] presenting the FIRST EXACT-NUMERICAL REPRESENTATION OF ALL TOTAL
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC MOMENTS.
The
MaryYugo wrote:
What do you think that video clip says of a technical or scientific nature,
if anything? It's just wishful thinking without data, isn't it?
What you fail to acknowledge is that NASA would not put out a video like
that if they didn't have the data to back it up!
Did a quick read of entire paper...
Santilli has been around quite awhile, and is a Ph.D. physicist; check out
the Wikipedia page on him. The paper is describing his recent tests with
his 'hadronic reactor', which is based on his own theories. Apparently, two
independent labs were used to
Jed can answer that, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was the guy who
threatened Jed with a lawsuit when Jed wanted to include his papers on
lenr.org... he is definitely a rogue researcher, and a bit course, but some
of that probably comes from the way his work has been treated by mainstream
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Did a quick read of entire paper...
Santilli has been around quite awhile, and is a Ph.D. physicist; check
out the Wikipedia page on him. The paper is describing his recent
tests with his 'hadronic reactor
I have a colleague who was developing an organic photovoltaic cell and at
one time we looked into what it would cost to set up solar panel
manufacturing facility. A single assembly line, highly automated, would
cost about $12M, and would run 24/7 and assemble ~20MW of panels per month.
There are
Jed wrote:
when I offered copies of papers by McKubre to Robert Park, he refused to
touch them. He stepped back and let them fall to the floor.
I've experienced the same thing. there is a MIT PhD physicist consultant who
works at a former employer. We have had several conversations about
Jones wrote:
At the risk of becoming overly repetitious, at a time where repetition is
not in favor here,
Jones:
If by some very remote chance :-), you are referring to my posts RE: a
certain other person's voluminous postings on mostly the same ol' thing...
personalities, then I would like to
, 2012 12:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Space Show revisited: A Carpet Bombing approach to
debating
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
We met one day for sushi, and I brought two or three peer-reviewed papers to
give him, since he kept using the excuse
Now that's funny! Good one Mary!
-m
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Capture Drone Downed by Iranian Saucer
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Capture
Axil,
Much appreciate your focusing on purely technical material. it's a welcome
diversion to engage in the discussions.
A mistake that many scientists make is assuming that a theory applies for
all possible magnitudes and/or combinations of physical variables which
affect the material under
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Space Show revisited: A Carpet Bombing approach to
debating
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I said I lost respect for him as a scientist
I would concur with Steven on the show, especially his description of the
segment with Pooley as the most 'entertaining'... I would call it comical.
Pooley kept on saying, If you can't explain it, it isn't fusion. Meaning, if
you can't explain it according to known theory, then it doesn't
of reasonable
hypotheses.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Storms on the Space Show
I would concur with Steven on the show, especially his description of the
segment
I know this has been discussed in the past years, but I'd like to put this
thought out there for the Vorts who joined in the last 12 months...
What is electric 'charge'?
Yes, yes, I know what it is according to fizzix books, but the Vort
Collective tries to probe down past the 'practical'
First, a few excerpts from the article found here:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-quick-cooking-nanomaterials-microwave-to
morrow-air.html
It's really amazing as to how nanostructures seasoned with just a few atoms
of sulfur can lead to such superior thermoelectric properties of the bulk
10, 2012 8:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is the aggregate electrical charge of our sun?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I know this has been discussed in the past years, but I'd like to put
this thought out
A little off topic, but perhaps interesting for some rookies in the
Collective.
For some first-hand experience with how rock fracturing affects it's
magnetic properties, and how that manifests in anomalous geomagnetic
activity (for EQ prediction), see this post:
. Did he happen to mention anything about the frequency response of the
device? I can imagine that it has a very low cutoff frequency, maybe a couple
of hertz.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint mailto:zeropo...@charter.net
zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l
Steven:
I believe he means 'units' and 'unit-less'... as in volts/meter for
electrostatic field strength. He doesn’t mean dimensions as in x,y,z,t
dimensions.
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 1:01
Typically, when you have a ratio of two things whose units are the same, the
answer (ratio) has no units since they cancel, and you're left with a
dimensionless (unitless) number.
In this case, you have:
mp+ / me-,
mass / mass
-mark
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven
Numbness/tingling in the fingers and toes could also be a sign of peripheral
neuropathy, often caused by diabetes.
Other signs of diabetes include excessive thirst and frequent urination
(probably from drinking so much water).
-Mark
From: David Jonsson [mailto:davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com]
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 3:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Defkalion posts useful information about nickel
Global Ni use/production was discussed many months ago here, but I think
it's a little over a million
[mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 11:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simple, even simple-minded tests can be a great help in
understanding these things
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Shes
Vorl,
RE: frenzied chicken counting...
I suggest you go back in the Vortex-l archive to ~Feb 2011, and start
reading. This is long *before* MY showed up, and you will find plenty of
skepticism from the usual contributors here, including myself. There were
postings about Petroldragon, the
That was hilarious Alan, and oh so descriptive of what we do here.. or most of
us try to do here! Excellent and amusing analogy...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 11:43 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
Jones:
Thanks for your diplomatic comments on my late night posting... I will
reread and think about them.
Trying to up the SNR a notch or two...
RE: Cooper pairs...
This is one of my pet peeves about the old, simplistic atomic models. We
were taught the following in school/college:
- opposite
the best,
Eric
___
eric.wal...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
That was hilarious Alan, and oh so descriptive of what we do here.. or most of
us try to do here! Excellent and amusing analogy...
-Mark
-Original
be a great help in
understanding these things
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the welcome. Replies inline.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Welcome Eric,
Thx for the feedback… this seems to be your first post. A few questions if I
may…
1) How long
How much Ni is used in a AA size NiCad battery In the battery recycling
Wikipedia page, it has a table which shows that a NiCad is 22% Ni, and NiMH
is 35% (I assume by mass?). What's an AA weigh, a few tens of grams? 100g?
-m
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Global Ni use/production was discussed many months ago here, but I think
it's a little over a million pounds/year.. no, I think it was a million+
tons/year! Someone also calc'd that it would take about 25% of that to
supply domestic e-cats globally... obviously a LOT of wiggle-room on those
Jones:
Pages 1 and 2 (Project Summary) are missing from that PDF...
-Mark
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 8:46 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?
Apparently
And it would become unbearably humid inside, so why hassle with it?
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Testing at University of Bologna - The Deadline Looms
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jed
I'll be first in line when it opens.
Supersoldier ants created in the lab by reactivating ancestral genes
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-supersoldier-ants-lab-reactivating-ances
tral.html
It isn't too far a stretch to go the next step.
-Mark
She's an insignificant troll. nothing more.
-m
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 7:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simple, even simple-minded tests can be a great help in
understanding these things
Mary Yugo
Scrambled Rocha-eggs for breakfast!
Yummy!
-Mark
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 6:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Welcome to Jurassic Park...
I cannot wait for some old genes of mine be reactivated so that I will lay
my
Akira,
Thanks again for keeping the Collective informed with new info!!
Best Wishes in 2012!
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:25 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Celani to announce a possible
Hi Jones!
You've been a bit too scarce the last 6 months... but I have a feeling it's
for a good reason! ;-)
I remember that discussion, and in it you wrote:
If Rossi knows this, he is pulling a clever deception. If not, if means
that
what everyone already suspects is true: the guy just got
The clues are coming out on a weekly basis. this today on PhysOrg.com:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-atomic-core-shaken.html
When struck just right, protons and neutrons ring. The sub-atomic particles
don't jingle like when a hammer hits a bell. But they do jiggle in an odd
dance
Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,
“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.”
Same old tired repetition, despite numerous requests that you avoid it. You
just never learn…
Is there really a brain behind the name or is it just a very poor
implementation
MaryYugo states with such confidence,
And while they were technically hands on, all the tests used Rossi's gear
and his questionable methods so they were not independent. Failure to state
that is either dismal incompetence or deliberate bias.
Note the statement, ALL OF THE TESTS USED ROSSI'S
, 2012 10:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of
Defkalion - Revisited
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,
“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing
Charles Hope said,
“You've already told her to shut up several times, so that's repetitive and
boring as well.”
I have never told her to “shut up”…
I have only requested that she not repeat lengthy explanations; that she should
simply state that she disagrees and provide the link to
:24 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's
assessment of Defkalion - Revisited
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Mary Yugo stated/asked,
“Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi
@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:A competent observer's assessment of
Defkalion - Revisited
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net:
Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,
“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.”
Same old tired
:
2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,
“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.”
Same old tired repetition, despite numerous requests that you avoid it. You
just never learn…
Is there really a brain behind
as the ideas in the Cold
Fusion chapter.
Nigel Dyer
_
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
More evidence that we are dealing with oscillations and need to look at
whether there are any harmonic relationships within the H-loaded Ni lattice,
plasmons, deflated H, inverse Rydbergs, magnetic effects
Please take this topic over to vortexb list!
-mark
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] N Korea's Secret Weapon
Were any of these documentaries done by countries or organizations not
More evidence that we are dealing with oscillations and need to look at
whether there are any harmonic relationships within the H-loaded Ni lattice,
plasmons, deflated H, inverse Rydbergs, magnetic effects, etc.
Note the statement, .a strong magnetic behavior, and that the
oscillations are
cross section 100 times larger than its geometrical area, and a field
enhancement factor of ~280, confined on a lateral section of ~λ/1,000.
More comments later.
-Mark
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 1:27 PM
To: vortex-l
I'll triple that...
I can see it now...
Not tonight, Frank, I have to post another repetitious rely on vortex!
:-)
Happy New Year to all, especially Frank and Mary!
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday,
Robin:
If one looks at it macroscopically, then your criticism is understandable,
however, one must keep in mind the environment of the H or D loaded lattice
at the dimensions of a few atoms. When you get ALL magnetic domains aligned
in a small region (a few 10s, 100s of atoms), magnetic fields
FYI: just a heads-up for the theorists in the group.
-Mark
Collaboration Resolves Century-Long Debate Over How to Describe
Electromagnetic Momentum Density in Matter
December 28, 2011
Researchers from the NIST Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology and
the University of British
Robin:
Thanks for the comments, and I see your chicken-n-egg argument...
As I prefaced my comment about Horace's calcs, I'm not sure if this is
relevant either...
Please note that in many cases I am just doing a brain-dump in the hopes of
triggering some creative thinking. :-)
OTOH, I'm not so
Another FYI:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-12-graphene-intense-laser-pulses.html
The researcher said:
We found from ultrafast spectroscopy measurements that dispersed graphene
sheets switch their behavior from induced optical transparency which is
well-known, to induced optical
magnetic forces become very large.
This tendency of particle spins to align in a magnetically attracting way,
creating a potential energy, is called spin coupling.
On Dec 30, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Robin:
Thanks for the comments, and I see your chicken-n-egg argument
SVJ wrote:
As far as I'm concerned the war against the fusion word is nothing more
than a petty self-serving theoretical product placement war. WTF cares.
I wholeheartedly agree Steven, but it's not you and I that needed convincing
these past 20+ years; it's the physics establishment. I
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/28/hagelstein-knew-its-not-fusion/
-Mark
Primarily for the theorists in the Collective.
This from the Ni-H yahoo group...
-Mark
I try to explain it:
All you have to do is, to put the electron from the H-atom nearer to the
nucleus and Fusion will happen.
From the K-electron capture from Be-7 I know, that a
Axil:
Thanks for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio!
It’s been going up steadily for the last two days, thanks to the ‘ol-timers…
-Mark
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 9:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Attenuation of decay
Fran:
Good point.
I think the evidence supports the hypothesis that, *whatever* LENR is, it is
not a single event; there are likely several different processes happening
depending on what kind of system one has (e.g., electrochemical or
gas-phase), and that it may also be a cascade of separate
MaryYugo asks:
Why is it that specific questions as to power output and duration are, to
some cold fusion advocates, like sunshine to vampires?
And Mary, the same could be said for your ANONYMOUS modeler. When asked in
a very polite, respectful manner some specific questions by Dave
This pretty much sums it up.
If there is anything I have learned from the pathoskeps over the past year
is that intellectual and well-reasoned arguments are not really necessary to
get your point across, and that annoying repetition can be effective.
-m
AussieGuy has put his money where his mouth is, unlike nearly all others on
this list. the person putting the money at risk, calls the shots. All he
needs from this forum is support and encouragement.
All I can say is.
- why did it take you so long to get here (that's actually meant to be
Just wanted to make the Collective aware of this patent.
This came from a friend, HF, who knows the patent's inventor closely.
HF is a retired electrical engineer who worked for 20 years on unique,
one-of-a-kind atmospheric instruments, and then for 10 years on pulsed power
(Terawatts)
Horace:
The problem I see with some kind of outside trigger is that the turn-on of
excess heat would occur randomly. how does one control when that cosmic ray
or muon will initiate the reaction? In one of the demos, it appeared to
turn on at a specific temperature.
-mark
From: Horace
Jed wrote:
Swartz sent me a similar letter when I quoted one of his papers and offered
to upload it. He threatened legal action in words similar to this fax if I
ever quote his papers or upload one. He sent me two messages like this. That
is why I deleted his papers from ICCF Proceedings at
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Now, notice that Krivit declares Holy War against Cold Fusion here
(notice that in the linked letter inside the article that most of the
arguments are based on religious texts, only):
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/21/lenrs-versus-cold-fusion-and-the-s
Best:
Persuade Rossi to sell (or rent) you a single e-Cat ASAP. I'll contribute
$ to that effort. Then have competent engineers instrument it and do a
proper test. If done properly, and it's a successful test, you won't have
any problems with advocacy.
-m
From: Ruby
It's humor, Mary, not endless repetition... humor is most welcome.
Next to Terry, I think I try to lighten the mood a fair amount too...
Do you remember the Danny Kaye movie, The Court Jester? Classic humor...
And did you know that there is a fraternal organization affiliated with
Freemasonry
Just some interesting news from PhysOrg.com
The onset of electrical resistance
Motion of electrons (blue) and holes (red) in an electric field (video)
This is exactly what scientists at the Max-Born-Institute in Berlin recently
did in a semiconductor material and report in the current
Nothing new in Mary's post. as USUAL.
The same old very tired speculations which PROVE nothing.
Same waste of bandwidth.
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Once again, I advise Defkalion to show
: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Once again, I advise Defkalion to show Stremmenos their
reactors
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Nothing new in Mary's post. as USUAL.
The same old very
OK, I ante'd up, so the rest of you out there need to help support this
forum...
RE: On the topic that Horace brings up re: moving all non-technical postings
to the other vortex list...
I couldn't agree more... I've posted several times in the past month or two
to get voluntary action to limit
Joshua wrote:
. And a top academic career would be a chair at a university or director of
a research institute.
Well, Josh, by your own definition, Dr. Robert Duncan, Vice Chancellor of
Research at Univ of Missouri, would then most definitely qualify as top
academic career, and he was
Bruno:
You're new to this forum. and for all intents and purposes, Yugo is too.
The regulars here have been quite tolerant about her insistence on remaining
anonymous; that is highly frowned upon here. There is no excuse for wanting
to remain anonymous as far as I'm concerned. I, and I bet
I'll get to Robin's two questions at the end, but first this important
clue...
The following is peer-reviewed proof (published in Science and Nature
Photonics) that a high energy photon can be converted to a lower energy
photon with the 'missing' energy coupled into the lattice (physical
]: Resonances...
On Dec 17, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
[snip]
This ties in with Alchemy as well, and the very difficult time LENR
scientists had with repeatability... conditions HAVE TO BE JUST RIGHT,
or else the effect does not manifest.
This should tell you something
.
=
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:54 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Resonances...
On Dec 17, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
How does one explain the observation that the energy involved
101 - 200 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
