on the Right Things!
Huh? I'm sayin' it's NOT a glow plug. Have you read the thread?
T
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Understood. You have the right to be wrong. :-)
Tell you what... there's $100 for you if you can find a glow plug that
looks
like the one
HOT OFF THE PRESS
Peter seems to have provided confirmation that indeed DGT reactions are
modulated by sparking rate. Control via sparking.
Same thing I have been saying all along.
Now... if I could only get people listening to my next speculation - Carbon
Nanostructure-based
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
HOT OFF THE PRESS
Peter seems to have provided confirmation that indeed DGT reactions are
modulated by sparking rate. Control via sparking.
Same thing I have been saying all along.
Now... if I could only get people listening to my
Well, we believe the Universe is expanding because of Red Shift. And we
presume that the expansion is accelerating because objects we presume to be
farther have higher red shifts.
But, there appears to be a big flaw in the interpretation that Red Shift
equates to expansion. Recent discovery
Why the need for delaying the publishing of the data. If tests have been
conducted, then DGT should have the data in hand. What's the rationale for the
delay except where the data disappoints. We were promised this data a long
time ago. Weren't there supposed to be market products by now?
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:principles of DGTG 's technology
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Peter maybe being set up for a fall.
And their reason would be?
T
This was the conclusion I arrived at as well, after reading Lou's many posts.
And this was the thought I tried to convey to Guenter in his 600C eCat
thread.
Basically, if your NAE is a transition metal lattice; i.e. Cracks (Storms), or
Patches (WL) or any other structures (Hagelstein), you
Hey Gang,
A while back, I was harping on the use of sparks for LENR reactors. I remember
quite a vigorous exchange of ideas as to why sparks may be or may not be a
critical component. There was discussion as to whether RF or sparks was the
important thing. I was speculating that the temp.
.
If true, how does this change the thinking about what DGT is using to
stimulate/quench their reaction to form it into controlled pulses?
Bob
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey Gang,
A while back, I was harping on the use of sparks
Let's put this misdirection attempt to rest once and for all.
A glow plug requires low voltage to heat. (Usually between a few volts to 6
volts.) A glow plug does not require a tall ceramic insulatior. A glow plug
has a long elongated cylinderical tube that contains the heating element
Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Harping on the Right Things!
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
I wonder what motivation people have in spreading this misdirection
: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Harping on the Right Things!
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
I wonder what motivation people have in spreading this misdirection?
Unbelievable how people can lie to your face nowadays and keep it cool
]:Harping on the Right Things!
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
BTW, if glow discharge is your goal, you wouldn't use a glow plug.
In glow plugs, the heating element is encapsulated in a sheath. I am
presuming you wouldn't want that in a glow
Interesting!
We always thought of cold as the absence of heat, darkness as the absence of
light, evil as the absence of good, weightlessness as the absence of
gravity.
Now, you are saying there is something that actually cancels heat instead of
just removing it - an anti-heat? Can we
Didn't Celani find out the superconductivity correlated with anomalous heat?
Superconductivity would seem to jive well with Axil's charge accumulation
theory. Metallic SWNTs exhibit long coherence lengths. MWNTs exhibit
ballistic conduction. Graphene exhibiting superconductive tendencies at
And only if you want to waste your money. Like I said, they don't last very
long when used continously as would be the case if DGT were using these to heat
their reactors.
A heating cartridge would make more sense for heating.
I tried using glow plugs in my first generation reactors with
Jojo observes for a glow plug.
I am not convinced either way.
Bob
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
And only if you want to waste your money. Like I said, they don't last
very long when used continously as would be the case if DGT were using
on a nickel substrate.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:superconductors and laser light
At 12:59 AM 7/15/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote
.
The comment from WM about DGT having trouble with the glow plugs not
lasting long enough goes with what Jojo observes for a glow plug.
I am not convinced either way.
Bob
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
And only if you want
There's only one hole with your conspiracy theory, and it's a hole you can
drive your Mack Truck thru:
That is, if Rossi is an agent to discredit LENR, whatever agency, entity,
person or company using Rossi should be immediately removed with extreme
prejudice from the human gene pool.
Why?
Awesome explanation Axil. Very useful in directing my reactor design.
So, Godes uses nanosecond laser. When translated to an electrical spark, how
long should a spark be? I am thinking that it would take a moderate amount of
time for the protons to be attracted to the lattice, travelling a
Most of the stuff in that first slideshow is beyond my paygrade, but did I read
slide 21 correctly.
I don't know if that graph was drawn to scale but if it isWOW. Coulomb
Barrier is reduced to a tenth of its original value when properly screened?
it via UPS, tax-free in four weeks.
Excuse my sarcasm.
Guenter
--
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: Vortex Vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 6:41 Montag, 9.Juli 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]: ECAT 600 C
Sigh , more stale regurgitations from the self-appointed expert of LENR.
Quite frankly, I hang on to Axil's every post as his posts have been useful
in advancing the current state of knowledge of LENR. Infinitely more than
what I can say about your posts. There is only one poster whose
What, pray tell, is the chemical that can bend spoons without eating the flesh
off your fingers? A quick google of the terms Geller Spoon Bending Chemical
revealed nothing. Many are so sure that Geller's spoon bending feat is a trick
(and I'm not saying that it's not), but they can't say how
, and could heal from human folly.
Guenter
Guenter
--
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: Vortex Vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 15:25 Sonntag, 8.Juli 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]: ECAT 600 C Operations
like a Karl May character, who pretended to
have visited distant lands, without ever experiencing them, or messing things
up, doing a disservice to us all.
Sorry.
Guenter
Von: Jojo Jaro jth
Rossi was able to convince technicians in the field, scientists and
important institutions because the technology was real. There is in fact a
gasification technology in existence today that can turn waste into
Synthesis Gas which can be made into Biofuel and mixed with Gasoline.
A few years
Mass Hysteria.
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 5:15 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Bosons and Bogons
What do you call a bus full of Higgs Bosons?
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
I suggest LENRv2 or LENR2 instead of LENR++ as this is a totally different
reaction, not just an enhancement of the previous process.
Version 2 is based on electric control of Carbon Nanotubes instead of
temperature control of Thermionic Catalysts.
Jojo
- Original Message -
to crash
head-on into each other!
-m
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 5:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bosons and Bogons
Mass Hysteria.
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Axil, the way I understand it from your posts is that: the 1-dimensional
nanotube would capture electrons in the plasma that will then accumulate charge
that will screen the coulomb barrier on any atom that may happen to be nearby.
When coulomb barrier is screened, fusion occurs, or fission
Amazing.
The atom looks like it might be composed of concentric shells.
Anyways, haven't we been able to visualize better resolution than this with
electron microscopy?
Jojo
BTW, how do you resolve a electron with light? Isn't an electron smaller than
the smallest wavelength of visible
Impurities can lower (or increase) the freezing point of one side of the
flowing water allowing it to freeze while the other side is still flowing,
thereby creating a curved icicle.
Breeze will not explain why the curve changes direction but impurities can.
Jojo
- Original Message
Axil,
Quick clarification. In your proposed charge accumulation in a 1-dimensional
structure ie. SWNTs, the electrons form a coherent huge wave on the SWNTs.
The electron charge is orbiting circling the 1-dimensional structure.
The way I understand this, the charge accumulation is on the
Axil, What is the basis of this assessment? It is only because Tungsten has a
higher melting point? Or is there any other LENR-based reason.
Seems to me that if SWNT-Based LENR is correct, neither Nickel nor Tungsten
would be relevant as the NAE is not cracks and you don't need a lattice.
Seems to me that a prize for Alternative Energy from a Shiekh who got his
riches from oil, appears a little suspicious.
If you ask me, the Arabs just want to know who has the best technologies for
Alternative Energy so that they can spend some of their oil money to paint a
bulleye on your
A follow up question for the group - more like a follow up wild speculation.
Do you think there is merit in the idea that a huge Electrostatic field induced
by a huge accumulated charge would somehow affect Electromagnetic radiation
like photons (gammas) and somehow split it into its quasi
Sorry Brain Fart.
It should say Orbiton, Chargon and spinon.
- Original Message -
From: Jojo Jaro
To: Vortex
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Radiation Screening and Charge Accumulation
A follow up question for the group - more like a follow up
Axil,
In you proposed theory of Charge Accumulation on 1 dimensional SWNTs, you
propose screening of Coulomb barrier that will result in fusion of H+ with H+
or Ni with H+.
In both of these cases, I believe gammas will be produced in abundance. Ed
Storms' cracks will shield gammas because
Yes, I am aware of that.
I was working under the assumption that there is some process on the lattice
that would thermalize the gammas. And comparing with a SWNT, that process,
whatever it is, is not present when fusion is induced by SWNT as opposed to
cracks.
But, no matter. Axil has
Hello Gang,
Based on my understanding of this process from the very limited information
about this process, I believe I have identified the heat source of the process.
I do not believe the heat source is LENR.
The following is based on my understanding of the procedure.
1. Spark Plug on T,
Nah! If Axil owned a company close to commercialization, he wouldn't be so
generous in sharing his understanding. If he did, he will quickly lose any
market advantage.
Axil is just one all around nice fellow for sharing his knowledge. If his
theories pan out and I am able to commercial my
There was an original message from Reliable. I responded to it. Many times,
the Vortex Mailing List system loses email. It happens a lot where you receive
an email that does not show up on the Web Interface and vice versa.
This is the Mailing List system that I have been lamenting about for
What you are saying is the current carrying capacity of a conductor is
proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor. That is true
only for the macro scale.
Current flow in a 1 dimensional SWNT appears to be governed by quite
different mechanisms. I do not believe the Current
of the Fe or Ni
nanopowders used as catalyst seed material might influence the creation of
Armchair SWNTs.
I think this is true and the smaller the particle, the more active the SWNT
formed from it will be.
I will get you more as time permits.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jojo
What?, Just $5? Make it real. How about upping your support to $1000.
Send me $1000 and I'll share with you my designs, procedures and results.
Or if you prefer, I'll let you in at the ground floor of my commercial
enterprise.
Jojo
PS. Just kidding. I'm sharing my designs and procedure
carbon SWNTs are also worth a look. They could support extremely
large currents and generate very strong fields. I'm not sure, but I think
some metals can crystallize this way.
Might the ratio of semiconductor/metallic carbon SWNTs be more important
than absolute purity?
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jojo
Axil,
I found a page discussing the properties of SWNTs and it mentions that
Metallic SWNTs exhibit Long Coherence Lengths.
http://ipn2.epfl.ch/CHBU/NTelectronic1.htm
From the page:
Numerous experiments on SWNTs and MWNTs allowed to gain additional
informations. At low temperatures, SWNTs
Hey Gang,
I've been reading a lot about Carbon Nanotubes and its significance as a
possible NAE, and something hit me.
Could the original ECat have been a CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition) reactor?
The similarity are numerous: A cylindrical reactor, a presurrized H2 envelope,
some nickel
to distribute the
CNTs to the nickel reactants for the LENR reaction.
- Original Message -
From: Cy Cle
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 10:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Could the ECat be a CVD reactor?
Jojo Jaro,Axil Axil wrote:SNIPA better way to get carbon
Interesting Axil, but this goes back to my original question.
930K is CVD reactor temps. So, was the Original Rossi ECat a CVD reactor?
If so, what could possibly have prompted Rossi to redesign his ECat into a
FatCat. Would a Spark Discharge reactor work better than a CVD based reactor?
As
, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Interesting Axil, but this goes back to my original question.
930K is CVD reactor temps. So, was the Original Rossi ECat a CVD reactor?
If so, what could possibly have prompted Rossi to redesign his ECat into a
FatCat. Would a Spark Discharge
Hey gang,
I would like to request (ask, beg, plead, beseech, supplicate) everyone to
please refrain from OFF-TOPIC discussions in this list. It is very difficult
and time-consuming to have to wade thru the numerous off-topic posts. Filters
simply won't work in filtering for the simple
Jed, I agree. Cold Fusion touches every aspect of our lives and society, but
that does not mean every aspect of our lives and society is appropriate for
this forum.
One may argue that some topics are marginally relevant but surely, you can
agree that some topics are way off topic. Surely you
and keep OFF-TOPIC off this
list!
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Surely you can agree that Wisconsin politics, school lunches, dead Everest
Bodies and the like are completely inappropriate. (Although I did find Everest
Dead Bodies Interesting to say the least.)
I agree they are OFF
Jed, a Forum Format is the forum format found in sites like ECatplanet.com. In
a Forum Format, the post are organized into seperate threads, where users can
only click to see a thread that interests them. Not like the Vortex mailing
list format where all threads are stuff down your email.
Hey Gang, Is anyone here aware of an easy test for the presence of Carbon
Nanotubes? Easy being simple and inexpensive and accessible to ordinary
folks without expensive equipment. A Test that would quantify the amount of
carbon nanotubes would be better than simply telling me that they are
Excellent series of posts Axil.
Till now, I still thought of electrons as particles that flow along the
nanotubes. I could not get a handle on how a nanotube would force a
one-dimensional flow and how charge could accumulate on the nanotube. Your
posts made it clear. Thank you.
Now a
possibilities that share the following ideas :
- imply high surface NAE
- imply local instabilities
- imply quantum coherence to overcame high energy barrier
2012/6/11 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
Yes, Lou's freight train analogy is nice, unfortunately, it is not a very
accurate analogy
If I understand you correctly, what you are proposing is similar to Ahern's
collective oscillons explanation; that random movements tend to conglomerate
together to concentrate energy that would organize electrons contrary to
the 2nd law of Thermodynamics.
That idea is intriguing if I
: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms' new Theory/Model
If I understand you correctly, what you are proposing is similar to
Ahern's collective oscillons explanation; that random movements tend to
conglomerate
Yes, Lou's freight train analogy is nice, unfortunately, it is not a very
accurate analogy.
In the train example, we expect the energy of the 100 cars behind the lead
car to impart all its energy to the lead car. This only becomes true when
the lead car can absorb, Store and concentrate
Hey Gang, I tried posting Ed Storm's new paper as an attachment to this forum
as per Ed's request but it did not post properly.
Hopefully, Jed has it posted on his site already. Jed, is it up on your site?
What do you guys think of Ed Storm's new model of LENR. Ed seems to have
pinned
Robin, let me see if I got this right.
1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and
convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in
copious amounts with an output of energy.
2. Then, you take the Hy2 molecule and split it into Hy+ and Hy+
.
Mike Carrell
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:46 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph Management
(and
LENR))
Robin, let me see if I got this right.
1. Your machine
Is it just me or does it seem that the numbers don't add up?
In SSM, COP should be infinite (or at least some ridiculously high number.)
And if he is running SSM 50% of the time, his overall COP should be
significantly higher than 6. The only way for him to get an overall COP of
6 is if his
Hey Gang,
I found a paper which seems to summarize the many methods for the efficient
decomposition of Hydrocarbons to H2 and carbon and carbon nanotubes - all of
which may be critical ingredients in the Flat Plate/Propane based systems that
many have had success with.
Robin,
I read your webpage regarding this potential Fusion Project, although I
found it rather lacking in detail and I am still unsure what you are trying
to achieve or how to achieve it. Are you in a position to reveal more of
your theory in terms an Engineer amd a businessman can
Have you come up with a way to produce these hydrinos cheaply (in terms of
energy.)?
It seems to me that the first step is to prove your theory with a relatively
cheap Hydrino Generator. I guess once you are able to create copious
amounts of hydrinos, it would be a simple thing to produce
)
At 09:11 AM 5/27/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I am unsure about your point or what you are asking.
What exactly is your discussion point or what exactly is your question?
Of course,there are strong inference. For example, if you find the
presence of Information in DNA, that is an inference
, at 5:42 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Once again, I hesistate to respond to you cause that will cause people
to roundly criticize me for starting a long off-topic thread. You bring
up several points that need a response, to set your fallacies straight.
Can you suggest a forum
After reading the entire paper front to back, I am overwhelmed by the
complexity of his experimental setup. Seems too complex and finnicky to be
scalable for commericial applications.
Although looking at his setup reminds me of DGT cylindrical reactor.
Specifically, it reminds me of the 2
it is worth.
To be explicit, I'm declining your request. I might want to discuss
this -- what's this? -- if I had a clue you were awake. I don't.
So here I am.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 28, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
First you criticize me for hijacking
)
--
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 11:17 Samstag, 26.Mai 2012
Betreff: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
There appears to be...
#
Jojo,
...My goal in brining
Distinguish what from what?
Are you asking if there are experiments in Darwinian Evolution and experiments
in Intelligent Design?
- Original Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was
compare them. It is legitimate, of course, to
have any number of experiments to achieve this comparison.
In this case, there are two hypotheses: Darwinian Evolution and Intelligent
Design.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Distinguish what from what
: James Bowery
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
OK, so you don't think you need an experiment.
Go fuck yourself.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am
this OR/OR dispute
was mentioned on this forum. But the analogy will not help.
Peter
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
OH my! What is your major malfunction? Are you experiencing major
cognitive dissonance? The Darwinian Evolution Religion you've
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
OH my! What is your major malfunction? Are you experiencing major
cognitive dissonance? The Darwinian Evolution Religion you've pledge yourself
to is not as factual as you thought it was? Did I just hit a central
.
Also, my 9 year old, with the same DNA at age 2 would most likely arrange
nonsense while at 9 probably something closer to your proof of intelligent
design.
BTW I do not have a strong enough belief in either theory.
On Sunday, May 27, 2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
OH my! What is your
experiment is
merely worthy of contempt.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Why on Earth would you think that I think experiments are unneccesary? I
am spending a small fortune right now conducting experiments. And that my
friend is more than what you
literalist as my friend G. including Creation and
Noah's Ark. You can write directly to me I respect your faith.
Peter
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
As I indicated before, I hesitated in posting about the fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution in this forum
are you a Bible literalist as my friend G. including Creation and
Noah's Ark. You can write directly to me I respect your faith.
Peter
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
As I indicated before, I hesitated in posting about the fallacies of
Darwinian
Axil, In your opinion, is LeClair process the same mechanism as the Mitt Candy
Hexane/Propane process?
It seems LeClair is more Hot Fusion than LENR, and appears to be totally
different from Rossi, DGT, both of which seems different from Mitt Candy.
Any ideas/suggestions on what Mitt Candy's
an inconsistency is pointed out and the response is
to dismiss it or explain it away without any real acknowledgement.
Unfortunately that kind of response is to be expected when math
replaces intuition in the art of theory making.
harry
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
I
I find your attempt to equate Darwin with Newton rather amusing.
If there ever was a field of pseudoscience, that is beholden to and extremely
malleable to political pressure; it is the field that Darwin created with his
swiss-cheese theory.
While Newton created whole fields of legitimate
Sorry I opened this can of worms. One response only:
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, centuries after Darwin, other people have indeed found an organ that
could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight
modifications. The bacterial flagellum is one
: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spark plugs... thoughts and how-to?
--
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: Vortex Vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 21:32 Dienstag, 22.Mai 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spark plugs... thoughts and how-to?
--
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: Vortex Vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 7:18
Dissociation of H2 to H+ is just one thing sparks do efficiently. The other is
the efficient formation of Rydberg matter that is probably key to the LENR
process, as Axil has speculated.
I am speculating that thermal balance is key to formation of Rydberg matter
in abundance. Spark rate and
-to?
--
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 19:10 Sonntag, 20.Mai 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Spark plugs... thoughts and how-to?
Jojo, You must be kidding.
Using a Spark Plug to plug a hole
Here's some off-the-shelf parts that you can use.
The CDI Ignition box can connect directly to a spark plug and you can drive
this ignition box with an Ignition Tester. You can drive sparks at a rate
of 300 to 20,000 RPM.
http://www.rccdi.com/news/ignition/1.html
My old design used these,
Axil,
Are you still of the opinion that Rydberg matter is the key foundation for the
creation of such exotic topological structures?
In your opinion, is it a coincidence that these exotic structures are found on
a Nickel substrate material? Or is Nickel key to these phenomena?
Jojo
when origniated in this manner.
I note that you mention that you use a different method of creating
turbulence in your device. Have you actually build one which has a significant
energy gain?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l
Dave, I disagree. I think the use of High Voltage Sparks is fundamental in
both Rossi's Ecat and the DGT Hyperions. I believe it is the best way to
create Ionized Hydrogen for the process.
I suspect the bulk heater is used to bring the temps up and then use the Sparks
to control the reaction
the
nickel by melting. How would you distribute the heating so as to alleviate
this issue?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, May 10, 2012 9:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Progress Photographs pdf from Defkalion
used a different approach in stimulating turbulence.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jojo Jaro
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Progress Photographs pdf from Defkalion Green Technologies
Rossi has not mentioned anything about
Keef, or whoever you are.
STOP this hijacking of the Vortex Site.
If you have a beef with Greg Watson, then take him to court. It seems you
already have and lost. I'm sorry for your lost but that is not the
collective's problem. Do not drag us in the mud. Go Away.
As I see it, if you are
Jed,
People here do not express often enough their gratitude for doing this hard
work. So, I am saying THANKS for everyone.
One of these days, you will enter the annals of history as one of the men who
helped usher in a Cold Fusion economy by your tireless work. BRAVO.
Although, I disagree
401 - 500 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
