Re: [Vo]:Borderlands sciences: vacuum bulb

2007-10-20 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
William Beaty wrote: They somehow found a small incandescent bulb which contains hard vacuum. Stick it on a Tesla Coil circuit so the whole bulb sits at high AC voltage, but also the filament lights up. And what do they observe? Weird inexplicable forces! But they wrongly assume that they've

[Vo]:I have returned

2007-08-18 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Howdy folks, I suppose I couldn't stay away for too long. Things have settled down a bit, so maybe I will be posting again. In any case, I waded through a few hundred emails from the group, finally going back into my account. About the Nimtz FTL thing...here's a link that has some interesting

[Vo]:Happy trails, guys

2007-06-19 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Dear Vortexians, Given a set of circumstances which have come upon me in the past few weeks, one death, another to imminently die, and another wasting away with Lou Gehrig's disease (amyotropic lateral sclerosis), plus a loss through the above death of almost all contacts or potential

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-06 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Hello all, I will sort through the latest messages on this and post replies as soon as I am able. I'm a good bit behind things as it is right now due to the sudden and unexpected death of a close friend. --Kyle

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-03 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Gentlemen, an update from the lab, Tests using smoke reveal the following: 1. With the Borbas device free to rotate, smoke is relatively unaffected in proximity to the device. It is hard to tell however exactly what is going on as the smoke is also being stirred around by the device motion.

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-02 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Michel Jullian wrote: Hi Kyle, Good work and good reporting, as always! Some comments below. No problem, and I appreciate the kind words. Ah yes I had forgotten about those stator bound emitters in the Borbas device! Indeed, to develop what you say in point 8 below, those become the

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-02 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Horace Heffner wrote: Even more sad. Sigh. I had a few hopes for this one, but it looks really bad. This is just another ion driven gadget. The ball end indeed apparently attracts (and is attracted by) the ions in front of it and creates a wind over and around the ping pong ball. This

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-02 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Michel Jullian wrote: Kyle kindly proposed to do some more tests, a smoke test with the rotor blocked and another one without the rotor (and its spindle bluntes) would be quite instructive! Yes, I can probably do that in a bit. I'm off now to go deal with some things around the house,

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-02 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
I wrote the following I think Borbas was expecting the wind to be coming from behind the balls, Re reading the above, I realize I need to use a bit more tact in writing messages. to the uninitiated, speaking of wind...coming from behind the balls might seem a bit crude. :) --Kyle

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-02 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Michel Jullian wrote: That's good, keep us tuned if that supply doesn't get you ;-) Regarding 3 and 4, why would you expect to see air moving outside of the bag? The device and Newton should be happy with air moving only inside (in the direction opposite the rotor) shouldn't they? Actually, I

Re: [Vo]:ion currents in pingpong balls

2007-06-02 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
William Beaty wrote: But... there would be no ion flows near the rotor if the pingpong balls were truely insulating. A cloud of opposite ions would just gather around the pingpong balls, then all air flows (ion flows) would stop. So I bet the pingpong balls are terrible insulators, and

Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster??

2007-06-01 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Howdy folks, Well, I bit (past tense of I'll bite) so I made one of these things and tested it. It does work, as Miklos Borbas says, but some things need to be addressed here. 1. The power supply I used outputs 10 - 30kVDC at around 5mA. Higher current is available, but I limit it to this

Re: [Vo]:Read posts before replying, PLEASE

2007-04-25 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Read posts before replying, PLEASE snip a lot...all in fact, read it carefully though I take it then that you nor anyone else really wants to

[Vo]:Read posts before replying, PLEASE

2007-04-24 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
To all, and some in particular, and some not in particular Please READ people's posts before posting replies. That means the whole damned thing, whether or not you agree with it. If you do not take the time to read the entire thing, either because you are too lazy to do so, or because the

Re: [Vo]:Global Warning

2007-04-22 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 8:01 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Global Warning It is already far warmer that it has been for an extremely long time, not 500 years. I can't be bothered reading the rest of your ignorant post but if

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.

2007-04-21 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 2:05 AM Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based. There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,

[Vo]: Re:

2007-03-29 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:38 AM Subject: [Vo]: Against this backdrop, Washington is consumed with ethanol euphoria. President Bush in his State of the Union address set a production goal for

Re: [Vo]: Scam or no?

2007-03-22 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:15 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Scam or no? 5 gallons = 19 liters; 19 kg. The heat of vaporization of water is 540 cal/g, so they are claiming at least 42 MJ/min energy

Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!

2007-03-11 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 8:50 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !! But not enough to cover the cost of pollution or the war -- which is mainly a war for oil. That is why the nation

Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!

2007-03-10 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:02 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !! Great, so $1360 a month, . Ends up about $800 for me a month, not including picking up my fiancee from her workplace. I suppose she could quit working

Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!

2007-03-10 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !! Turn up the heater, do go for a drive in the summer and find less depressing music and maybe environment. Unfortunately, I can't turn off my thoughts. My

Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!

2007-03-10 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 10:15 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !! I confess that I pulled the toll of $1 per mile out of a hat. The correct figure should be ~$0.25 per mile. This

Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!

2007-03-09 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:07 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !! I do not know whether highway taxes are more likely to invite corruption than other kinds, but I think we should

Re: [Vo]: Lifters

2007-02-20 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 2:06 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Lifters hmmm A sheet of paper inserted in the gap of a spark plug will prevent my dad's lawn mower from working. Does that prove beyond a shadow

Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters

2007-02-19 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 6:47 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters So the high voltage source is what drives the pump ? Of course, it drives the Lifter, and the lifter is acting as a sort

Re: [Vo]: Lifters

2007-02-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 1:56 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Lifters I did it with a balance beam and a pointer, and saw nothing significant. Also did it set up as a torsion arm. How did you calibrate

Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters

2007-02-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:08 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters No extra force in oil, it works just the same as a lifter it's an EHD thruster, called ion drag pump when the medium is a

Re: [Vo]: Lifters

2007-02-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Lifters So the lifter was oriented so it would move horizontally rather than vertically ? In some tests, it was set to move horizontally, in

Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters

2007-02-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters Then why did you say made to work by sucking and pumping the oil? What I mean by that is, the lifter worked, as in

[Vo]: Re: Re: Lifters

2007-02-16 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:06 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Lifters They work fine in a grounded metal cage in my experience. In the experiments you describe it may be more a question of the LDPE

Re: [Vo]: Lifters

2007-02-16 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:08 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Lifters What was the highest potential used in the vacuum experiments? Around 20kV. As I see it, there is a balance between the charges

Re: [Vo]: Lifters

2007-02-16 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:25 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Lifters Did they place the box (with lifter inside) on a scale? The weight should not change if it is ion wind. I did it with a balance

Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox

2007-02-15 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:43:03 -0500: Hi, [snip] I solved the paradox by

[Vo]: Lifters

2007-02-15 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
All, As far as the lifters go, I can say this: I have worked with these little gizmos quite a bit in the past, particularly several years ago when Transdimensional and all started the hype. I don't know what NASA has to say about them, nor do I particularly care, given their (NASA's) rather

Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox

2007-02-15 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox Distant stars are not out of sight fortunately :) Depends on how close to the rather light pollutive city of

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-02-01 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:36 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics No offense to anyone, but I just cannot imagine not hearing about M-theory. It's by far the biggest thing in

Re: [Vo]: FRE

2007-01-12 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:34 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: FRE snip my mention of Pellegrino/Zebrowski Do you really think there was a beginning? If so, then what created that beginning? Uh...what does this

Re: [Vo]: FRE

2007-01-11 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:33 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: FRE Ugg, capitalism. When is humanity going to grow past the need for the me me me stage? In all fairness here is humanities evolution --

[Vo]: Re: Cold fusion powered rockets

2007-01-04 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Hmmm. If you can find some way to make the temperature high enough (interesting, high temperature cold fusionheh), and I mean bloody high, that is, a pure fusion explosion, then we are all set. Pure fusion Orion. IIRC, one of the Orion proposals was to weigh a few thousand tons, and with

Re: [Vo]: Re: Cold fusion powered rockets

2007-01-04 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Cold fusion powered rockets Better than that. Freeman Dyson's super Orion was going to use 1,080 bombs of 3 tons each, with the mass of the ship being

[Vo]: Re: What Energy Crisis?

2006-12-31 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 4:32 PM Subject: [Vo]: What Energy Crisis? What energy crisis? IMHO, the energy crisis you face is an inability to generate a suitable income. I have the same problem.

Re: [Vo]: Musings on grid-independence and personal alternativeenergy

2006-12-30 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 9:59 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Musings on grid-independence and personal alternativeenergy Say what? I didn't send you a negative off-list response! I didn't send

Re: [Vo]: Musings on grid-independence and personal alternativeenergy

2006-12-27 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Musings on grid-independence and personal alternativeenergy As the wind charger -- we live in a woods, so I'm not sure how

Re: [Vo]: Oil shale research in Israel

2006-11-28 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:31 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Oil shale research in Israel Speaking as a CO2phobe and bonafide tree-hugger I object to being called an envirofascist. I notice you

[Vo]: Oil shale research in Israel

2006-11-25 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Interesting if accurate: http://www.upi.com/Energy/view.php?StoryID=20061107-070924-5161r And the CO2phobes begin to scream in 5...4...3...2 If indeed workable, we can begin 2 things almost immediately, if played right: 1. Rapidly shut down U.S. reliance on foreign oil imports, ideally

[Vo]: Re: FW: [Vo]: weight and charge

2006-11-25 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jeff Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:49 AM Subject: [Vo]: FW: [Vo]: weight and charge Rather than use hydraulic shocks on vehicles that convert energy into waste heat, why not use electro magnetic shocks

Re: [Vo]: OT: Give Mel a Break?

2006-11-13 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 7:23 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: OT: Give Mel a Break? Would all follow this law, we would be admitted into the Galactic Federation. Until then, we are considered

[Vo]: Re: How Can You Be in Two Places at Once . . .

2006-11-09 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:40 AM Subject: [Vo]: How Can You Be in Two Places at Once . . . The quantum world is about to get bigger 01 November 2006 From New Scientist Print Edition. The

Re: [Vo]: The Hydrino Harvester (c)

2006-10-29 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:06 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: The Hydrino Harvester (c) There is a company called JP Aerospace that has an idea of going to space in a balloon.

[Vo]: Re: Chinese Tokomak Fusion

2006-09-30 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 10:50 PM Subject: [Vo]: Chinese Tokomak Fusion PS The Chinese are also interested in the Shawyer photonic drive device. Wanted to buy the rights to it. I think its

Re: [Vo]: SUVs

2006-09-28 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Philip Winestone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: SUVs But NOBODY can answer the question I ask constantly (in fact I've been greeted with consistently stony silence, even from journalists

Re: [Vo]: Aquaculture for energy

2006-09-26 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Aquaculture for energy ... and other passenger vehicles that gets less than 20 mpg. Confiscate and destroy them all. Pay the owners the

Re: [Vo]: faster than light speeds, CBR etc.

2006-09-25 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Original Message - From: Remi Cornwall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 3:23 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]: faster than light speeds, CBR etc. There must be a chance of seeing a frame 0 we have been accelerated from whose time is running fast, not

Re: [Vo]: Re: California Sues Car Co.s

2006-09-24 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 9:25 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: California Sues Car Co.s There is no question that tobacco kills hundreds of thousands of Americans. I didn't say

Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor

2006-09-16 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 12:30 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor No Kyle, your mistaken. You doubt KE = 1/2mv^2? To postulate a scenario where a supposed reactionless engine consumes

Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor

2006-09-16 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 6:10 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor Not in anything other than reactionless propulsion. But why make it a special case? But you must assume that the

Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor

2006-09-15 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 6:27 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor What you should note is that this device if it works at all MUST violate the conservation of energy, there is no way round it,

Re: [Vo]: Aether and free energy, etc

2006-08-31 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 7:00 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Aether and free energy, etc String theory is dead. Terry Now THAT would make a nice T-shirt. String theory is dead. -Blanton But try

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Original Message - From: John Berry To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products I am sort of against the war at this point Bright chap eh? ;) I prefer the dark myself. Your 'sort of' against the war at this point? I

[Vo]: Re: [SPAM] Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Nick Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:25 AM Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products I'm snipping most of this as it is not really worth the effort Currently, America and Israel are the greatest threats

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-17 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: "Nick Palmer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: vortex-l@eskimo.comSent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:25 AMSubject: [SPAM] Re: [Vo]: New Segway ProductsI'm snipping most of this as it is not really worth the effort Currently, America and Israel are the greatest threats

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-16 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:50 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products ..and exactly why do you think the suicide bombers feel that it is worth giving up their lives? Because, if you

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-15 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 11:51 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products Wrong. Both Jews and Christians *are* doing these things too. The only difference is that the Muslims don't have

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-13 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products I can sympathize with your sense of outrage. However, are you willing to acknowledge the sense of outrage that also exists on

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products aka: Why We Fight

2006-08-13 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 5:12 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products aka: Why We Fight snip my previous comments ...solve the problem more elegantly and completely The ultimate solution? Hasn't that

Re: [Vo]: New Segway Products

2006-08-12 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
My $0.51 (adjusted for inflation and rising energy costs): 1. I think the matter of who stole what land from who to make who's nation is a moot point from a serious point of view. Israel is a free, industrialized technological nation. They have a large number of scientists and do not fly

[Vo]: Re: Methane as fuel, recycling CO2?

2006-06-29 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
- Original Message - From: Kyle R. Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 6:47 PM Subject: [Vo]: Methane as fuel, recycling CO2? Not a single reply. This seems common with anything I post. --Kyle

[Vo]: Methane as fuel, recycling CO2?

2006-06-26 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Hello all, First off, I must say I hate the term alternative energy. Why? Alternative has a sort of 'its not the greatest but its something to fall back on' kind of attachment to it. I think this stuff is more like advanced energy, but thats just my $0.75 (inflation, no longer $0.02) I've

[Vo]: Re: We're All Adicted

2006-06-25 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Neuroscientists at the University of Southern California have proposed a simple explanation for the pleasure of grasping a new concept: The brain is getting its fix. According to researcher Irving Biederman, the click of comprehension triggers a biochemical cascade that rewards the brain with

Re: [Vo]: PLEASE.... RE and not RE .

2006-06-19 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Probably most of them I would imagine since in the course of one short e-mail you managed to misspell Vortex TWICE! lay population of Votex I hope others in and of votrtex I think it is perhaps better to misspell than to populate Vortex-L with any number of oddball theories

Re: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday June 9, 2006

2006-06-10 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
nothing to reply to directly I am beginning to find the tone and/or subject matters of recent postings disturbing. And not only of this particular thread. Will someone please explain what has happened to vortex in the past few years? It is not the same. If its not clear what I am saying, I

Re: Scientists? We note voltage..but no mention of current

2006-06-03 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Re: Scientists? We note voltage..but no mention of current - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:00 PM Subject: Re: Scientists? We note voltage..but no mention of current I don't know anything about this experiment, but current

Re: Energy Secretary Sees Fusion as Part of Solution

2006-05-24 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: In case nobody's noticed, things are hotting up in South America too. Morale's nationalization of Bolivia's oil fields is surely just the opening gambit. I dare say the rulers of Central and South America are quite familiar with the notion of Peak Oil... True.

Re: Home Power Hybrid

2006-05-24 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
I suppose that a fully electric vehicle with four independent motors coupled directly to the wheels might be even more efficient. That design would do away with the need for a transmission and differential. You would have to trust the computer to keep the car on the straight and narrow! I for

Re: Gravitomagnetic Field Quantified

2006-03-24 Thread Kyle R. Mcallister
snip description of experimental setup This is old news, has already been done by Podkletnov, Schnurer, etc. Someone needs to let these guys know that there is nothing new under the sun. The history and ethics of science is damned interesting, isn't it? --Kyle