RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st-That's Enough!

2006-02-26 Thread Rick Harnish
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohnnyO Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 12:19 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st   I 2nd that one Bob ! - Noone likes a lil tattle tale - I think John Thomas just let his alligator mouth overload his mockinbird butt on this

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread JohnnyO
I 2nd that one Bob ! - Noone likes a lil tattle tale - I think John Thomas just let his alligator mouth overload his mockinbird butt on this one. Definitely lost my respect. JohnnyO On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:49 -0500, Bob Moldashel wrote: John J. Thomas wrote: >There has been so much talk a

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread JohnnyO
ill see to that. If the FCC wants you, they will eventually find you. John Thomas >-Original Message- >From: Frank Muto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 06:20 PM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Chuck
AMEN ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blair Davis Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 1:39 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Do you report people to the authorities for not wearing their seat belts

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Bob Moldashel
John J. Thomas wrote: There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the FCC find those WISPs that are snubbing their noses at the law. This is a professional list and those here should be abiding by the law. I wonder if it would be a good thing to "kick out" those that p

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- Original Message - From: "John J. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st > There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Blair Davis
Tuesday, February 21, 2006 06:20 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.pdf 20. Are there penalties for not filing Form 477? Entities that are required to file Form 477 but fail to do so may be

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread A. Huppenthal
they will eventually find you. John Thomas -Original Message- From: Frank Muto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 06:20 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.pdf

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread John J. Thomas
6:20 PM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st > >http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.pdf > > >20. Are there penalties for not filing Form 477? > >Entities that are required to file Form 477 but fail to do so

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Bob Moldashel
Bob Moldashel wrote: Marlon K. Schafer wrote: - Original Message - From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Oh Marlon, Marlon, Marlon...

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Bob Moldashel
Marlon K. Schafer wrote: - Original Message - From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Oh Marlon, Marlon, Marlon.. He

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Dawn
General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Kurt, With all due respect I would like to ask that you not post suggestions that are blatantly against FCC regulations. In both of your messages I included below it appears you are advocating the complete disregarding of FCC regulati

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
- Original Message - From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 tr

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Checking now. thanks marlon - Original Message - From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" ; "Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:20 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
forms for others. It'll take a bit the first time or two but after that it shouldn't be too hard. Thoughts? marlon - Original Message - From: Rick Harnish To: 'WISPA General List' Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:21 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Smith
just fill the damn thing out and start making the system WORK FOR US. Kurt Fankhauser wrote: Someone needs to start an online poll in which we can go on and anonymously vote on weather we fill this form out or not. Does the FCC say how many of these forms are being turned in? Kurt Fankhauser

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Harnish
, February 21, 2006 9:28 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains of thought that have been brought out on this list. One is to file and let the Commission know they exist and the o

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Dawn Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:20 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Kurt, With all due respect I would like to ask that you not post suggestions that are blatantly against FCC regulations. In both of your messages I included below it appears yo

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Harnish
-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Muto Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:21 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broad

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Scott Reed
06 21:28:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st > Hey Scott, > > By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains > of thought that have been brought out on this list. One is to file and > let the Commission know they exi

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Bob Moldashel
Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains of thought that have been brought out on this list. One is to file and let the Commission know they exist and the other is to fly under the radar. Some say letting the FCC (and others) know they exist could b

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Frank Muto
- Original Message - From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" ; "Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK. I ag

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck
b Moldashel Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:20 PM To: WISPA General List; Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181) Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I have several partners so I am not the only one to decide so I will leave it at that as it pe

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Scott Reed
gt; To: WISPA General List , "Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:20:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st > OK...OK. > > I agree that all should probably file.  I have several partners so I am

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck
, 2006 5:20 PM To: WISPA General List; Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181) Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I have several partners so I am not the only one to decide so I will leave it at that as it pertains to my WISP entity. BUT

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Bob Moldashel
OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I have several partners so I am not the only one to decide so I will leave it at that as it pertains to my WISP entity. BUT...What is the penalty for not filing Does anyone know??? Can we get an official statement for this situat

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Dawn
Kurt, With all due respect I would like to ask that you not post suggestions that are blatantly against FCC regulations. In both of your messages I included below it appears you are advocating the complete disregarding of FCC regulations. I like to think of the WISPA list as a professional pl

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Harnish
eral List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st   Someone needs to start an online poll in which we can go on and anonymously vote on weather we fill this form out or not. Does the FCC say how many of these forms are being turned in?   Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnu

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Someone needs to start an online poll in which we can go on and anonymously vote on weather we fill this form out or not. Does the FCC say how many of these forms are being turned in?   Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com