It's my understanding that one just needs to have documentation in place
as to what they will do if presented with a CALEA request. Does this
need to be extremely detailed, or can it be boilerplate? Does anyone
have a CALEA document they wouldn't mind sharing? There's a couple beers
in it for y
Re: [WISPA] Calea ComplianceRight.
There are documents that WISPA has created to help with this.
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=2022
We also have an implementation guide but the board has not determined how
that's to be distributed. We can certainly get a copy to you if you are a
m
pa.org] On
Behalf Of Roger Howard
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 10:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Calea Compliance
Ok, but the FBI wouldn't know I stuck the hardware there at the last
minute. And the tower glitches off whenever I do a firmware upgrade
anyway. The custome
allow for what LEA needs to get a conviction for
>the guilty party. All of these are built into CALEA.
>
>>
>> CALEA has many regs which say when we are doing too much to help tap
>> connections. The WISPA CALEA standard was created to act as a
>> guideline for WISPs. I
into CALEA.
>
> CALEA has many regs which say when we are doing too much to help tap
> connections. The WISPA CALEA standard was created to act as a
> guideline for WISPs. It tells precisely what our obligations are in
> helping assure we can perform lawful intercepts in our net
too intrusive.
CALEA has many regs which say when we are doing too much to help tap
connections. The WISPA CALEA standard was created to act as a guideline for
WISPs. It tells precisely what our obligations are in helping assure we can
perform lawful intercepts in our network and in preventing
Ok, but the FBI wouldn't know I stuck the hardware there at the last
minute. And the tower glitches off whenever I do a firmware upgrade
anyway. The customer wouldn't know the difference.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Depends who you ask. Some might say the customer could
Depends who you ask. Some might say the customer could notice a "change in
network" and hence non compliant.
On Mar 5, 2011 10:43 PM, "Roger Howard" wrote:
> Would I cover myself for calea by having a mikrotik router on the
> shelf, set up as a bridge, with the calea module installed. Then if I
>
Would I cover myself for calea by having a mikrotik router on the
shelf, set up as a bridge, with the calea module installed. Then if I
get subpoenaed for a tap, I just run out to the appropriate tower and
put it on the ethernet interface of whichever AP the subscriber is on?
Thanks,
Roger
-
pa.org
Cc: caleaquesti...@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA CALEA Questions] [CALEA] CALEA Question
Martha,
Mike,
Marlon,
WISPA members,
I have reviewed your EMail questions regarding the FCC's new definition of
broadband and have discussed them with the
fyi
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "J.C. Utter"
To: "CALEA Questions"
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA CALEA Questions] [WISPA] Trango and CALEA
>> In an ideal world one would never even "touch" a packet that had not
fyi
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Michael J. Erskine"
To: "CALEA Questions"
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA CALEA Questions] [WISPA] Trango and CALEA
> Good evening everyone! Happy Christmas to all of you.
>
> It has b
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Erskine"
To: "CALEA Questions"
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA CALEA Questions] [WISPA] Trango and CALEA
> CALEA prevents even the WISP from over collecting. We are no longer
> permitted to
Jesse is one of the main writers of the WISPA CALEA standard.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Norell"
To: "Josh Luthman"
Cc: "CALEA Questions"
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA CALEA Questions] [WISPA] Trango and CALEA
a.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA CALEA Questions] [WISPA] Trango and CALEA
You'll just have to drop a tap in right behind the AP.
If you have client to client allowed I have no idea how to help you.
Anyone else have any ideas for Josh? (remember to hit reply all) marlon
- Original Message
Hi Chris,
Butch would be a good place to start. I've also cc'd the rest of the WISPA
calea team. Maybe there are people on there that do things I don't know
about.
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting service
Hi all-
I'm just curious if anyone has a contact for someone that is
a CALEA compliance contractor.
Essentially we are looking for a third party that can verify
compliance.
Hit me offlist, please.
Regards,
-chris
al Message -
From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:32 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] CALEA
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
>
> >1. The ISP will know a actual intercept subpoena is coming before
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Larry Yunker wrote:
If I am not mistaken, when you are being asked to provide
information in a legal matter in which you are not a named-party in
the legal action, you are being placed in the position of a
witness.
Exactly. This is where the "duty" that I mentioned in m
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Frank Muto wrote:
I have a question though you may or may be able to answer it. In
point 1, you said you gave the LEA information on how to word their
subpoena? Was this knowledge based on an attorneys consult? I'll
assume it may have been unless you are an attorney yourse
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
1. The ISP will know a actual intercept subpoena is coming before
they receive it.
Actually, in a couple of cases, this was true. In the others, the
subpoena came without any notice.
3. The LEA would like the ISP to have all the CALEA "I's" dott
Comments Below...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Muto
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA
I have a question though you may or may be able to answer it. In point 1,
you said you
Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA
It looks like the FCC making us be CALEA compliant was a total waste of time
& effort (on both parties sides) and only made a atmosphere of fear. It also
sounds like while they filed for informa
d when writing up a subpoena and or warrant to present to the
court.
Frank Muto
President
FSM Marketing Group, Inc
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wispa List"
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:57 AM
Subject: [WISP
It looks like the FCC making us be CALEA compliant was a total waste
of time & effort (on both parties sides) and only made a atmosphere of
fear. It also sounds like while they filed for information that has
classically been available pre-calea, has anyone had to comply with
the real time streaming
November 30, 2007 3:57 AM
To: Wispa List
Subject: [WISPA] CALEA
I just wanted to make a brief post relating a few experiences relating to
the CALEA "scare" that was recently the "talk of the town" (so to speak). I
should preface this post with a bit of information that will giv
I just wanted to make a brief post relating a few experiences
relating to the CALEA "scare" that was recently the "talk of the
town" (so to speak). I should preface this post with a bit of
information that will give some insight into how common (or not) law
enforcement will or will not use CAL
: [WISPA] CALEA (recovering costs) ???
I guess from the lack of response nobody is compensating for their CALEA
costs?...or maybe my email didn't make it to the list?
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dylan Bouterse
Sent: Friday, Octob
: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA (recovering costs) ???
Hi Dylan,
I am not compensating for this. I am not sure that customers would be
appreciative or understand. Also, the costs that you are referring to
could possibly happen only when you are given a subpoenaed unless you
are
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] CALEA (recovering costs) ???
I guess from the lack of response nobody is compensating for their CALEA
costs?...or maybe my email didn't make it to the list?
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beha
007 5:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] CALEA (recovering costs)
It was mentioned back during the CALEA hype that some had considered or
did add a CALEA fee on their Internet Service bills. I'm curious if this
was done and if it was successful (without upsetting customers or
creatin
neral List
Subject: [WISPA] CALEA (recovering costs)
It was mentioned back during the CALEA hype that some had considered or
did add a CALEA fee on their Internet Service bills. I'm curious if this
was done and if it was successful (without upsetting customers or
creating too many billing
It was mentioned back during the CALEA hype that some had considered or
did add a CALEA fee on their Internet Service bills. I'm curious if this
was done and if it was successful (without upsetting customers or
creating too many billing inquiries). Feel free to reply off list if you
don't want to a
PLEADING CYCLE EXTENDED IN THE MATTER OF PETITION FOR EXPEDITED
RULEMAKING TO ESTABLISH TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 107(b) OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT ACT (CALEA)
RM-11376
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2522A1.pdf
Comme
Sam Tetherow wrote:
I don't want to drag this topic up again, BUT ;) Two years ago, did
this apply to ISPs or just VOIP providers? I don't remember anyone on
the lists talking about CALEA being for anything other than VOICE in
various forms, but maybe my memory is selective, wouldn't be the
with (all solutions will be
either from or looked over by the CALEA committee members, no endorsements
etc. blah blah blah though) on the committee I'll get them added to the
WISPA CALEA page so you can easily find them again.
Here's the first one I've gotten back from a committee me
iving there is doing something bad? It was my
understanding that a bit more info is required and it has to actually
have a person or persons in mind. Why would data taps be treated any
differently?
Lonnie
On 5/10/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading the WIS
Lonnie
On 5/10/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading the WISPA CALEA FAQ and was a little concerned
about
> question #10. If the LEA does not know who the suspect is using an
open
> access point does this mean that everyone that has used that access
> point wi
r since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] CALEA FAQ Questions
Ma
spect "someone" living there is doing something bad? It was my
understanding that a bit more info is required and it has to actually
have a person or persons in mind. Why would data taps be treated any
differently?
Lonnie
On 5/10/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been
ifferently?
Lonnie
On 5/10/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading the WISPA CALEA FAQ and was a little concerned about
> question #10. If the LEA does not know who the suspect is using an open
> access point does this mean that everyone that has used that access
>
I have been reading the WISPA CALEA FAQ and was a little concerned about
question #10. If the LEA does not know who the suspect is using an open
access point does this mean that everyone that has used that access
point will have their data handed over to the LEA? It would seem that if
the LEA is
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:37 -0400, Dawn DiPietro wrote:
> Marlon,
>
> I have been reading the WISPA CALEA FAQ and was a little concerned about
> question #10. If the LEA does not know who the suspect is using an open
> access point does this mean that everyone that has used that
Marlon,
I have been reading the WISPA CALEA FAQ and was a little concerned about
question #10. If the LEA does not know who the suspect is using an open
access point does this mean that everyone that has used that access
point will have their data handed over to the LEA? It would seem that if
Is there a standard for the captured data and do you have to use it to
be CALEA compliant?
Individual carriers are free to choose any technical solution that meets
the assistance capability
requirements of CALEA, whether based on an industry standard or not.
Carriers, therefore, have some
deg
2846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, May 04
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
There will likely be cases where that's impossible.
Lets say that I have a customer that's a hotel. They, at first, only know
the ip addy or ma
e.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
Marlon,
I was under the impression the providers are only supposed to send the
- Original Message - From: "Tom DeReggi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
In my opinion, I don;t think it will fly because of "NAT".
The law inforcement agrency needs to be
]
Sent: Thu, 03 May 2007 20:00:17 -0800
Subject:
Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
> gas 3.20 per gallon here. $95.00 to fill my truck yesterday.
>
> Sheesh
>
> Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> > We have a line item of:
> > "Surcharge to cover the cost of a sales tax bein
ISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
I think you better just take a rate increase and chalk it up to
increased expenses all the way around as opposed to creating a CALEA
charge line item. Adding a fee as a line item could get you in tro
t gas prices is that crop prices are also
way up. I'll take $3 fuel with $6 wheat any day :-)
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Que
Read the FAQ. In some cases they may have to sort through ALL data to get
at what they want.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Questi
WISPA
effort is approved.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Cornett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
I give up I just signed a contract to ensure my protection under CA
Sounds good thanks Sriv.
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
I think you better just take a rate increase and chalk it up to
incr
#x27;t charge the fee for hosting or dialup
plans.
There is nothing wrong raising your prices to be competitive with the
'big boys!' :)
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 2:46 PM
T
t are you thougths on this.
- Original Message - From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
Peter R. wrote:
Why not check with a knowledgeable legal professional
Ross Cornett wrote:
I give up I just signed a contract to ensure my protection under
CALEA. My hope is tht those that become compliant do not get
underminded by those that have hidden in the bushes and took the risk
upon themselves by not becoming compliant.
It appears that it is time to sta
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
The FCC wrote:
we conclude that establishments that
acquire broadband Internet access service from a facilities-based
provider to enable their patrons or customers to a
alone.
What are you thougths on this.
- Original Message -
From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Question
Peter R. wrote:
Why not check with a knowledgeable legal pr
Peter R. wrote:
> Why not check with a knowledgeable legal professional instead of guessing?
That'd be my boss's department. :D
I'm just a pundit - full of opinions and hot air.
> Now you can choose to ignore it, and say a prayer daily that Barney Fife
> or any other LEA officer does not knock
David E. Smith wrote:
The FCC wrote:
we conclude that establishments that
acquire broadband Internet access service from a facilities-based
provider to enable their patrons or customers to access the Internet
from their respective establishments are not considered facilities-based
broadband In
Tim Kery wrote:
Examples of these types of establishments may include some hotels,
coffee shops, schools, libraries, or book stores. DOJ has stated that it
"has no desire to require such retail establishments to implement CALEA
solutions," DOJ Comments at 36, and we conclude that the public inte
Thank you Jack. I am glad to see someone doing something for their
beliefs instead of kicking WISPA in the chins for not doing it for them.
WISPA is here for all of you to interact and decide what and how you
want to represent yourselves and your industry. Jack knows that means he
can do someth
The FCC wrote:
we conclude that establishments that
acquire broadband Internet access service from a facilities-based
provider to enable their patrons or customers to access the Internet
from their respective establishments are not considered facilities-based
broadband Internet access service pro
quot;
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Exemption for Small Wireless ISPs
My opinion then, is that the FCC can get off their duffs and provide
internet to the hinterlands themselves.
There is more to CALEA than having a $500 unix box, and sharing a
$7000 turnkey bo
ments
to CALEA.
So, Starbucks doesn't need to comply with CALEA but the service provider
that provides bandwidth to Starbucks does.
Hope this helps.
Tim Kery
BearHill Security, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[WISPA] CALEA Question
David Peterson DPeterson at Wirelessguys
good for a
mile or two.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Exemption for Small Wireless ISPs
My opinion then, is that the FCC can
7;t
figure it out for themselves. Might as well be you!
marlon
- Original Message - From: "Todd Barber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:19 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] CALEA Compliance
John,
The part that
My opinion then, is that the FCC can get off their duffs and provide
internet to the hinterlands themselves.
There is more to CALEA than having a $500 unix box, and sharing a $7000
turnkey box is not an option unless you are sharing it within a tight
geographical area since response times on e
I believe the feds have secret deals with the telcos so they can do what
ever they want besides calea. Just like I pointed out that fiber att
wiretapping deal in the very first days of wispa calea discussion.
This is where I see the imbalance,
The little guys carry the weight and the big guys
Dear cw,
Thank you for your opinion. I respectfully disagree.
There's nothing wrong with admitting that small local providers can't
afford to comply with the same requirements that big carriers like AT&T
can comply with. That's the problem here; small local businesses are
being asked to shell
My opinion is that you're not helping the big picture by saying compliance
is more than you can handle. The FCC is not going to go out of their way to
hand out more spectrum to providers that can't perform basic requirements.
Just like they're not going to help providers that refuse to file 475
om someone else.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message - From: "David Peterson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:57 PM
Subject: [WISPA] CALEA Question
As I am finding
Well, everybody gets their Internet from someone else.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "David Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:57
As I understand it anyone who runs a router has to be CALEA compliant.
Call the FCC ... these guys will answer your question and call you back:
www.fcc.gov/calea
Or ask a Legal Professional like Kris Twomey.
Chris Savage or KC Halm from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP will take your
questions about C
it. lol
Ross
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Compliance
Tim Kery wrote:
Hi Ross,
You also have to remember that Law Enforcem
Tim Kery wrote:
Hi Ross,
You also have to remember that Law Enforcement's primary focus is Law
Enforcement and not developing technology. The FBI/DEA/DOJ said as much
when in 2004 they petitioned the FCC to expand CALEA to broadband and
VoIP. Essentially, they argued that it isn't possib
Dear Representative Stupak,
I'm writing to support your request on March 14, 2007 asking that the
FCC Commissioners consider a waiver from CALEA regulations for small
broadband providers.
In a nutshell, the costs of complying with the CALEA provisions are far
in excess of what small broadban
As I am finding myself back into sales, I have a question concerning CALEA. I
just read this blurb:
The “facilities-based” terminology was meant to include providers offering
connectivity infrastructure between end users and the Internet. However,
establishments that acquire broadband Internet
rt of appeals upheld FCC's
CALEA Broadband Order in American Council on Education vs. FCC.
Hope this helps.
Tim Kery
BearHill Security, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:40:06 -0500
From: "Ross Cornett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALE
But more importantly... from this day forward, you will not be able to
start, or deploy a wireless or any other kind of internet providing network
that doesn't have ALL aspects of CALEA compatibility built in. That
pretty much rules out the vast majority of present equipment and methods of
deploym
You need to filter out data that is not under the subpoena.
And (as I understand it) the LEA should work with you to get the data.
Ross Cornett wrote:
If we can come up with a device to capture and send to an FTP server
and allow for VPN connectivity then why can the most powerful law
agency
Ross Cornett wrote:
I still would like to know the amount of incident that this CALEA will
cause for all of its costs to our industry. Did anyone ask the FBI,
why they cannot have several machines and deliver them as needed
pre-configured then we can install them when they are needed. It is
y, May 01, 2007 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Compliance
If we can come up with a device to capture and send to an FTP server and
allow for VPN connectivity then why can the most powerful law agency in
the world not do the same. This way they controll it all. We just
provide the pip
, 2007 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Compliance
Ross Cornett wrote:
I still would like to know the amount of incident that this CALEA will
cause for all of its costs to our industry. Did anyone ask the FBI, why
they cannot have several machines and deliver them as needed
pre-configured the
a need that
will largely be an expensive dust collector in most businesses.
Anyone know if this has been posed to the FBI.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 7:54 AM
Subject: Re
John Scrivner wrote:
We look forward to proving that this thinking is wrong. What part of
CALEA compliance is it that makes you think we cannot develop a low
cost and reasonable solution which will not break the bank?
Even if you do come up with a way to handle LI in time for the deadline
t
coming. We (the wispa calea committee) are working on building the
standard now.
I have seen numerous posts indicating that small providers should
not be concerned and that attaining CALEA compliance would not put
them out of business.
Those posts would be correct.
I contacted them today
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Compliance
I went to email him, but his website says he will not respond to emails from
outside his district.
won't work for us and we need to try
to synthesize in two weeks.
I have many hours of reading everything I can find, starting with the rules
published by the FCC. Much of what is being said on this list by WISPA
CALEA project people appears to conflict with what I read from the FCC
its
hose ttp's have already gotten figured
out.
Someone's gonna make money off of those out there that can't/won't figure it
out for themselves. Might as well be you!
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Barber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "&#x
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Compliance
>I personally do not believe that any CALEA can be cost effective. Quite
>simply, solving CALEA requires spending money without earning any
>additional rev
I personally do not believe that any CALEA can be cost effective. Quite
simply, solving CALEA requires spending money without earning any
additional revenue. The only way to justify the CALEA expense is to accept
it as a cost of doing business. This means simply that your market
opportunity is l
I'd like to add my own brief CALEA comments and concerns. Out of respect
for the "maximum of 5 posts per day" proposal, I'll keep it short.
I'm thinking that extending CALEA to small WISPs without compensating
them for their costs has more to do with "the big fish eating the little
fish" than
> I have seen numerous posts on the WISPA list indicating that a cost
> effective and compliant solution for this issue was being worked on and
> would become available in the near future.
>
I think that is wishful thinking on some people's part. When you see
companies like Cisco struggle to provid
I have been quietly watching and waiting as the CALEA compliance issue has
been discussed and information pertaining to it has become available over
the last few months.
I have seen numerous posts on the WISPA list indicating that a cost
effective and compliant solution for this issue was being
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Costs-Shifting Relief
> On one of the documents that I've rad that maybe is not that public,
&g
On one of the documents that I've rad that maybe is not that public,
they have taken into consideration that some isp's can not afford to
impliment calea and they have a solution for that.
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Peter,
Thank you for posting this information. Since there is a $5000
applicatio
costs.
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA Costs-Shifting Relief
> Peter,
>
> Thank you for posting this information
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
