[Dieter Maurer]
| Have a look at Date properties. They are already objects.
Yes, you are correct.
WarpFramework, which I'm using for this project has support for the
type of properties I'm talking about. Rather, a framework for using
properties. Getting similar behaviour into Zope was the
'Evening, Zopistas.
I'm developing an accounting product right now, and one of the more
interesting aspects of how to solve this issue is how do handle
currencies. I've decided to let each entry (transaction) know about
the currency it was in. At a later stage, the user is given the
option to
[Chris Withers]
| Go look at ComputedAttributes...
Yupp. But are you suggesting that ComputedAttributes are the end-all
be-all solution to the problem I proposed, or only a part of it?
As I see it, they hardly specify a framework for attributes.
[Michael R. Bernstein]
| On Wed, 2001-09-12 at 22:45, Erik Enge wrote:
|
| *scabbers off to the CVS* Thanks! :)
|
| Eeew!
|
| I hope you meant 'scampers', as I have horrific visions of what
| 'scabbering off' would look like...
Hehe! Oops... Yeah, that's what I meant. Ever since I
[Evan Simpson]
| If you grab OFS/Traversal.py (I think) from the CVS root, it should
| fix the problem.
*scabbers off to the CVS* Thanks! :)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
Hi!
I've have this custom __bobo_traverse__ hook:
def __bobo_traverse__(self, REQUEST, name):
Intercept the traversal
if name:
if hasattr(self, name):
return getattr(self, name)
When I call the object like this:
/objecta
ie. using __call__ (I
[Dario Lopez-Kästen]
| I need to be able do some processing for each and every request that
| is sent to zope to determine some enviromental thingies, *before*
| the request is processed by the main zope mechanisms.
I'm not entirely sure, but you might be looking for something like this:
[Erik Enge]
| def index_html(self):
| we have a doc string
| return DTMLFile('index_html', globals())
|
| And that worked [...]
Actually it doesn't. Don't know why I thought it did.
This however does work:
index_html__roles__ = ['Manager']
def index_html(self):
we
Hi,
I'm trying to use PersistentMapping instead of a regular mapping
object, but I'm running into some problems. When I add and remove
stuff from the mapping it sometimes fail or removes the wrong thing.
Do I need adapt my code to it, or should it be straight forward?
[alan runyan]
| I believe that before ZOPE can truely take off it will need a
| miniVend like solution to get the PHP/CF/ASPers to ZOPE.
What is miniVend?
| I would like to see a Roadmap for ZOPE.
Aye!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Other than: http://dev.zope.org/Resources/ZopeDirections.html?
Well, it is from February. And besides, it describes what we
have/semi-have now, and not what is planned for the future (for
example, where do DC think Zope is in three, four or five years?)
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
I think we need to setup a separate mailing list for this project. Can
you do that? I think the discussion is getting too specific now.
We can use the mk-zprod-devel mailinglist at thingamy.com:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
All what the wizard will do is provide the user with a nice
interface/GUI to enter the information. I will then pass the
information to the above mentioned management methods and the
MakeZProduct Product will then generate the code and save it to
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Edgardo Zulian wrote:
I'm just new with Zope, and I m trying to make an external method with
python that return me the names of the files that are in an especific
folder of the Zope i.e:the folder: Root Folder/function_repository..
I'm not quite sure what you want to
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Hm. a simple collection of questions? Certainly not. I talking of a
whole mechanism, where you group input and output into contexts. From
application view it would be an API, it schould work no matter if the
input/ output is generated from and to
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
Here my list of questions:
1. Will we create ZClass or Python Products?
Python Products.
Product-name
2. I think it should ask some more meta-data information here, such as
License, Author(s), Description
Yepp :)
A list of images
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
name: attrib1 default value: None
name: attrib2 default value: something
No, that wouldn't work, because you might want None as the default for
that attribute. Maybe Nothing, or somesuch
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
Well, but where are the images coming from. The Wizard is a Web
Frontend, so we would need to upload the images or copy them from
somewhere else from the file system.
From the filesystem of the user?
BTW, the /img directory is non-standard.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
For example we would need:
manage_make_initializeProduct(...)
manage_make_addClass(...)
manage_make_addProperty(...)
manage_make_addIcon(...)
manage_make_addSubClass(mainClass, ...)
I just realised something. How do you need this to work?
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
Okay, okay...I stayed up and typed it down pretty quick (2 hours). I
attached it to this mail. It is plain text, since I was too lazy to do
it in HTML. It might be a little unstructured, but I am too tired to
fix that now.
So what does it do? :)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Paul Everitt wrote:
It is a *desire* of ours to be GPL-compatible. Not a requirement, as
it can be awfully tricky, complicated, and time-consuming to get
there. But we've told people that we're intending to give it a shot.
That's much appretiated :)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
if there are always many objects to create, may be it would be better
to have a generic mechanism for asking users and represent
app-/management interfaces rather then copying all the stuff over and
over?
That's what mk-zprod does. Or rather,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
I'm not so picky about bloating, but adding a document of 1K adds some
400K, and keeps growing.
:
How much eat for you (I know you cataloged some 50K documents)?
I can't remember, but surely not that much. I had some 30.000 documents
that
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eric Roby wrote:
The bottom line to all this venting (and I am not trying to shoot the
messenger here) is that I need to understand where my efforts should
be focused. If I need to abandon ZClasses in lieu of pure Python,
then I need to know that now so I don't waste
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
How about meta-programming (designing) via the Zope interface, with
UML or somesuch; automatically generating Python code, then enable
designers to use a ZFormulator-ish product to edit the interface while
a programmer can work on the 'backend'
On 26 Jun 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
DC has been up-fron about how they make money. They do so by selling
development services using Zope as a toolkit/platform.
Yes, and forcing those paying customers to use GPL is very hard (and not
very nice, either).
Well, I guess the issue is
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
I looked at the code pretty quick. I like it from the first view. It
is very clean and easy to see the functionality. I think, if you can
define an ZPI for your communication, then it will be no problem to
put a SmartWizard Class Generator
Giovanni, which Zope version are you running?
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
How many indexes do you have, what are the index types, and what do
they index? Likewise, what about metadata? In your last message, you
said there's about 20. That's a heck of a lot of indexes. Do
(I removed [EMAIL PROTECTED].)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
Any hints on how to manage something like? We use both textindexes,
fieldindexes, and keywordsindexes (textindex on string properties,
fieldindexes on boolean and datetime, keywordindex on strings). Maybe
one
On 25 Jun 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
Other than keeping the door open for this eventuality, is there any
other reason to choose a BSD style license over the GPL?
Yes. A commercial one; an imperative one. If I make a Zope Python
Product, I must license it as GPL to be able to
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
(Paul says:) I think the goal should be for Zope and Python to
converge on the same license, with perhaps the new license being some
off-the-shelf license like Apache's.
Wow, lobbying the management team at DC is pretty easy ;-).
It's good to see
[Simon Michael]
| Now you're talking. Seconded.
Me too!
And if the management team really needs alot of serious breakdowns as
to why this is a problem (GPL-incompatability, that is) let me know
and I'll drum up a nice little mail of my own. :)
___
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Now, if the ZPL were GPL compatible, the GPL would be in full effect
for products. Digital Creations would automatically have the rights
to redistribute derivatives of ZWiki. I believe DC would even be able
to distribute ZWiki with Zope as long as
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
Yes, you can distribute a GPL-compatible licensed code with GPL
licensed code without licencing the former under GPL. Take a look in
the Linux-kernel source tree for example.
Ok, good. Then Thingamy's intermediate solution will be to create a
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
You're not allowed to distribute a derived work of GPL code with proprietary
code incorporated.
Ok, this is the situation. We in Thingamy usually create all our products
under the GPL. Then we give the whole shebang to the client we have been
On 21 Jun 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
if your product derives from GUM or uses internal interfaces, no, you
can't. if your product uses only well the defined external api or
access gum through zope, then, imho, yes.
Ok, that's good. Then it means we can potentially use GPL Zope Python
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
I'm guessing this is the point at which your problems become mine? ;-)
*evil laughter* Yes :-)
We should write about it and publish it to the community...
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20 Jun 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
i am sure that the QPL and the ZPL are completely incompatible but
nobody cares because nobody really thinks that one is better than the
other...
I might be misunderstanding here, if that's the case I appologies.
Just to clarify, for us at
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
These are good ideas to improve the TextIndex. I already encouraged
Erik to put alltogether into a Fishbowl proposal,
Which I would do, if I had time. Which I will have, but not for another
two weeks. :-)
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lexis-Nexis: Sean w/2 Upton (where w/2 is within 2 words)
This wouldn't be hard to make happen. I don't know if it is better to do
it before of after the parsers, though. Maybe a more userfriendly alias
would be best as a default?
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would you be willing
submit the module to the collector?
Do you think you (or someone else for that matter) could have a look at
[1] the method that returns the position in the document -
explicitly with adjoinedby in the query) is to insert
adjoinedby in phrased searches:
erik enge- erik adjoinedby enge
erik ... enge - erik near enge
What do you think?
I'll be submitting PositionIndex.py and ResultList.py in a day or two
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Excellent! I haven't looked at it in detail, but thanks very much for
contributing it! Maybe we can roll some of this work into a
position-aware Text Index
It is actually a TextIndex on steoroids. Remove the _proximity attribute
and a couple of
When writing the PossitionIndex, a bunch of questions arrised (Zope
2.3.2):
This is from UnTextIndex.py Zope 2.3.2 line 250 (or there abouts).
Why is the wordMap needed?
def getEntryForObject(self, rid, default=None):
Get all information contained for a specific object.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
To be really useful I think the PossitionIndex' _proximity dictionary
needs to be turned into a BTree of some sort, but apart from that I
don't know what is missing.
It's now using BTrees. And I renamed it to PositionIndex (thanks to
Chris Withers
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
But, if I try: dtml-var ObjectInstance, then I cannot use
self.REQUEST, since the namespace is somehow not passed.
Don't you have to use dtml-var ObjectInstance()?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
I wan't to run two webservers on the same machine one, zope/apache an
one apache. Can I set it up with 2 ports eg. 8080 and 80 but how do I
do it?
Edit the z2.py file in your zope/ directory, look for HTTP_PORT and adjust
that to your needs.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
Feel free to review and comment the propsal to replace
the current DateTime module of Zope by the mxDateTime module:
From the proposal:
License issues
mxDateTime stands under the EGENIX Public License that is considered to be
an Open Source license.
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
See an earlier post on a different thread. Chris wrote that the
license is BSDish and is therefore compatible with ZPL. This means
that mxDateTime could be distributed with Zope.
Yes, but in the proposal Andreas mentions the GPL, not the ZPL, and
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
Hi there!
Hello :)
I wan't to use php with zope, does anybody know how the header syntax
shall look like? Tried diffrent syntaxes but i get wierd outputs, not
as expected.
Try this one: URL:http://www.zope.org/Members/Mamey/PHP.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
It really doesn't matter how many conflicts there are. Within a
single transaction, 1 conflict is as bad as 100.
Why?
But I think I have a solution for all of the issues in conflict
resolution.
Whee!
If you, or anyone else, is also
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... at least then we know what the exception is.
:
Again - try that code in an interactive interpreter if you really want to
find out what's going on...
Yeah, thanks, that would work as a workaround, but isn't this buggish
behaviour?
[no cross-posting, please]
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
We're planning a Yahoo! Clubs like system that should scale to about
30, 000 users. Assuming about 3,000 groups and 20MB per group (group
functionality includes photo albums), gives a database size of 60GB.
Assuming on
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
I'm running a 1GB Data.fs with CompressedStorage here and that takes
probably about 3-5 minutes on a 1GHz with 1GB RAM. I keep banging my
head against it, but it just won't run faster.
Oops, misleading you there. Actually, FileStorage uses about 40
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Richard Jones wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/BarewordExcepts
Feel free to find the bad except: and submit a patch...
Ugh. There are tons of them... I'll see what I have time for.
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Magnus Heino (Rivermen) wrote:
Where can I get PartitionedFileStorage?
Here: URL:http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/PartitionedFileStorage
Didn't show up in any searches, though. Maybe worth indexing?
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB as
the storage? I know that it has its own indexes etc. so I am
wondering if it no longer needs to load an index into memory.
I'm not sure, but as I said in a previous
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Amos Latteier wrote:
I encourage you to check it out and leave your comments, criticisms, and
suggestions.
I like. That pretty much captures it :)
There is one thing, though. Let's say I have this class NiceBigCar. The
developers docs from what you suggest are fine,
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
to you. :-)
Well, now we all know what vikings believe an hour or so mean, don't we?
I figured it out, I think. Let's say I have these two methods:
def a():
b()
def
Hi,
sorry I can't test this myself. I get this behaviour in 2.3.2, and I find
it strange. I'd classify it as a bug.
If I pass this query to a TextIndex:
(word1 OR word2) AND (word3)
it is first translated to this:
[['word1', 'or', 'word2'], 'and', ['word3']]
which is fine. But then,
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Brian Lloyd wrote:
Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 has been released - you can download it from
Zope.org:
Cool stuff.
I have a couple of comments, though. For future ref., should I post them
to the Collector?
- lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/__init__.py is missing the ZPL
- why
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
I have written a proposal.
So, if I understand correctly, when this is implemented, will the ZCatalog
always resolve conflicts and never raise ConflictErrors? If there are no
ConflictErrors in the main object system?
I think I'm missing the point
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
How did you miss the point? That's exactly the point! :-)
Oh :)
Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are
no conflicts in the data being indexed.
This is why I think I've missed a/the point: wouldn't it be better to
Hi,
has anyone given this a good run? I'm a bit confused as to how to make it
work. Do I just subclass it in FileStorage? Will it work with existing
Data.fs or do I need to start anew, so to speak?
Thanks.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
On 31 May 2001, Ty Sarna wrote:
Zope basically uses whatever object custom_zodb.Storage is as the
storage.
Ahh... I can feel the zen pouring over me :)
What you want to do is create a FileStorage, and wrap it with a
CompressedStorage and use that. Your custom_zodb.py would look like:
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
I don't think you are using a globbing vocabulary.
I think I am:
print_info(applic.Catalog(word='scripto*'))
unsplitted ['scripto*']
unl: ['scripto*']
unq: [104623, 'or', 112198, 'or', 151568]
Length: 6
Content: [mybrains instance at 1226d358,
searching for:
eri
and that gave me four results. No globbing, then?
Then again, where did you get these objects? If you were looking at the
wrong point in the code, the wildcards may not have been expanded yet.
Could be it...
[['erik', '...', '...', '...', 'enge']]
Where do
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Casey Duncan wrote:
Works great for me. Perhaps you are using a Vocabulary that has
Globbing turned off?
I'm not sure, how do I check?
This query works:
wil?car*
This doesn't:
(wil?car* or something else) and (word1 and word2)
I can't see that the
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
8 words. Not characters. But actually I just looked at the source
and it's not even that. It's treated essentially as an AND query,
because the UnTextIndex code doesn't store any proximity information
between words. ( I knew this once, but I had
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You should be able to do this with quotes around the words, but that
feature is sort of only half-wired-up at this point. [snip] Currently,
quotes around word do the same thing as parens around words (word1
NEAR word2). Sigh.
What does NEAR mean,
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I believe it means within 8 words in the current implementation...
So, word1 NEAR wordlongerthan8characters wouldn't come up with
anything? Or is it number of characters inbetween?
Is it in line for 2.4?
No, unfortunately. I'm not sure when
Hiya,
it basically says it in the subject. How can I search for word1
word2 without ZCatalog/TextIndex interpreting it as word1 or/and
word2?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'll be curious to see the results. Hopefully you'll have better luck
under 2.3.1b2.
I've indexed about 410.000 objects now. A plain query with 'meta_type'
and 'firstname' to searchResults takes about 3-4 seconds. Not too bad,
but not that good
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd be curious to know how long a query that involves only a single
field index takes, and how long a query that involves only a single text
index takes... does each take a roughly equivalent amount of time?
I might be able to check that for you
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Well, that's good, except I thought you couldn't get rid of objects?
Muhahaha. I got those little bastards... :)
Yes, but not with 1,000,000 objects (see
lib/python/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py). It would be nice to have
such a report.
If I
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
YourCatalog.catalog_object(newobject)
as opposed from inheriting from CatalogAware and relying on manage_afterAdd
or calling object.index_item() manually. That's really it.
Well, if you put it that way :)
*removing CatalogAwareness*
(it's
Thanks for the fast reply!
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Have you read
http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/HowTos/UpgradeToNewCatalog/index_html
? I suspect there will be improvement.
Surely there will be improvement, but not of factors two or three, or
more?
And, I can do the
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Probably not much difference on bare bulk indexing speed, but I'll bet
that it finishes this time. ;-)
We'll see :)
I'd either make my own CatalogAware-alike mixin class that did things
a bit differently than CatalogAware (perhaps didn't index
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Well, I thought the upgrade to 2.3.2b2 would solve the problem but it
hasn't :-( I have a (very important :-S) Zope instance which hangs at
what seems like the slightest touch.
Maybe I can help.
I've seen similar behaviour, and by some chance I
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Very strange!
Indeed.
Did you look in the log files? Have their been any core dumps?
I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
to you. :-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Are the imported object CatalogAware?
They are.
The old (pre 2.3.1) catalog implementation was know not to be very
storage friendly. If a significant portion of the catalog indexes
would be affected by imports, then you would see a quadratic
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
This level of growth doesn't seem like a sane level of growth... what
Zope version are you using?
Zope 2.3.1b1
Someone told me that ZEO and bulk-adding could be a thing to look at...
Isn't bulk-adding what you're doing now?
It is, but I'm
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Erik Enge wrote:
I'm using Zope 2.3.1b1 so that shouldn't be a problem?
Yes, it will be. [...]
So the bug in Zope 2.3.1b1 which makes the ZODB grow dramatically is
gone in Zope 2.3.2b2?
___
Zope
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
I'm trying to find out of there is a point where you start getting
non-linear performance penalties for additional objects (storing,
retreiving, or indexing).
I've just finished adding a somewhat small number of objects: 5000.
For every 1000th
Hola,
please don't make me touch C or a ... erm... you know, one of those
compiler-thingys. I don't like them.
Does anyone have a nicely baked Splitter.c for Linux? The one that Spisak
hacked to make it chew and swallow anything?
Fhank you very much. :-)
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way I can choose whether I want searchResults
to Or, Not or And the search? Or do I need to combine searchResult calls
and what not?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You need to manually do unions or intersections on results from multiple
calls to searchRequest currently.
Is this a feature to be implemented? If not, why not?
Oh, and by the way, "searchRequest"?
___
I need some help with indexes.
I'm confused about what I can index in which Index. Which index does not
remove numbers? Which of them do I use to index a telephone number
(containing characters). What about email addresses? Special characters?
*oink* Help...
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
I'm trying to find out of there is a point where you start getting
non-linear performance penalties for additional objects (storing,
retreiving, or indexing).
I don't know, but I feel that is the case. Actually, I know it is the
case, but I
[observe the speed of Chris replying... *astounded* :)]
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Erik Enge wrote:
I'm confused about what I can index in which Index. Which index does not
remove numbers?
FieldIndex, KeyIndex
Wow, KeyIndex? Is this a new one? Or did you mean
Hi, Michael.
Sorry for taking so long getting back to you.
The programmer solving our problems with the post codes has solved it in a
different way than what I would've done (his method is way superior), so
we're not ending up adding all addresses as Zope Objects.
Therefore, I don't have any
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
I've started seeing errors like this:
Hm. It might be related to the problem Andrew K. is seeing over at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Are there archives for that anywhere?
There sure is...
URL:http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2001-February/thread.html
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Is it alright to rely on this attribute of the REQUEST object?
Hm What is 'steps' in context of REQUEST?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
I wasn't reading the code clearly the first time around.
By far the simplest place to return copied results from methodB is to
change the last line to
Thanks, it all works nice. Nearly, that is.
The reverse problem is now gone. But the fact
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
I only get this when a ConflictError occur.
Nope, it occurs every time I change to another object. I need to do some
more testing here. It seems as if the 'objects' variable of 'methodB' is
semi-persistent or something. Weired
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
The use of a literal anonymous list in methodb's signature for "objects" may
have something to do with the results you're getting on conflict. Try
assigning "objects" to an empty list in the method body instead.
Of
I have two nice methods. One of them (methodA) is called via the web.
These belong to one class; classA.
class classA:
"doc string"
def methodA(self):
"doc string"
objects = self.methodB(self)
objects.reverse()
attrib = ''
for object in
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
The short answer is "you can't, easily".
I'm a bit confused.
Will FieldIndexes also behave like TextIndex, in that they remove stop
words, digits and so forth? I think I've picked up somewhere that
FieldIndexes treats the whole content of the
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
Feedback and debug information coming your way as soon as possible :)
Ok, I index DTML Methods, Python objects, and all different kind of
things. Then I did a search, meta_type set to 'DTML Method' and it gave
me an unauthorized. Strangeness.
I've
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
