At 06:12 PM 5/12/04 +0800, Choo Zhi Min wrote:
What does import os; print os.name return in Cygwin, nt or posix?
Python 2.3.2 (#1, Oct 9 2003, 12:03:29)
[GCC 3.3.1 (cygming special)] on cygwin
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import os
os.name
'posix'
At 12:04 PM 12/29/03 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
This is how I'm using extended section types in my code currently. The
proposed change won't affect me because I explicitly specify the data
types in derived section types. It seems to me unlikely that you'd have
a base section type with a
At 01:53 PM 12/29/03 -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
Phillip J. Eby writes:
That reminds me... is there any way for section *names* to be
case-sensitive, or at least case-preserving? For example, if one were
simulating Apache-style configuration like:
There isn't, but there was at some
At 04:55 PM 4/24/02 -0300, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
As for multiple DB rollback, yes, that works as advertised, and is
actually really easy to believe if you explain them how it works. Truth
is, Two-Phase-Commit was INVENTED (a long time ago, and not in Zope) to
make it possible to commit
At 08:22 PM 4/15/02 -0500, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
Hi Marcello,
Wow.. sounds like a neat book. ;-) Seriously, Phil Eby has
suggested that there will be some sort of migration helpers to move from
ZPatterns to
There probably will not be any migration tools written by me or Ty; we
Folks, can we please stop the zope-dev/zope3-dev crossposts and direct this
thread to zope3-dev only? You're doubling the volume of posts I have to
read. :) Thanks.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:17 PM 1/28/02 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
On 1/27/02 11:25 AM, Steve Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
When I define an Interface, are the methods of the interface supposed to
have self as the first argument?
No.
Can you expand on
At 01:12 PM 1/18/02 +0100, Stefan Bund wrote:
Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Method rebinding is done only when an item is retrieved from the aq_self
side, and only if im_self points to aq_self. If these conditions are met,
a new binding is created which points
At 10:43 AM 1/19/02 -0500, vio wrote:
* vio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020119 09:56]:
So Globals.InitializeClass(your_class) finds the declaration
'security.declareSomething()' inside a class, but 'security' being
a reference to a ClassSecurityInfo object AT THE MODULE LEVEL somehow has
no effect at the
At 09:42 AM 1/18/02 +0100, Stefan Bund wrote:
A--O--[a]
| |
| [b]
|
O--B--O--[c]
| | |
| | [d]
| |
| O--[e]
| |
| [f]
|
[g]
...
let /m/ be a method of the objekt /f/. The expression of interest is
x := A.m
I would expect /x.im_self/ to be an acquisition wrapper C
C :=
At 10:06 AM 1/6/02 -0800, Michael Olivier wrote:
I'd like to form (or join) a separate mailing list for ZPublisher-only
apps. I know there are zope developers like me who use ZPublisher +
FastCGI (or whatever) + apache (or whatever) to run a web site. I know we
would not have the benefit of
At 05:49 PM 1/3/02 -0700, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
'subscriber' is a reference to the subscribing object, and it's very
likely to be to an object in the ZODB. Is it wise to have more than one
persistent reference to a single persistent object?
I swear that I had once heard Jim say (vocally)
At 10:18 PM 12/23/01 -0800, Michael Olivier wrote:
I'm using ZPublisher + PCGI w/o the full Zope environment. Is it possible
to have an object that defines a __bobo_traverse__ method and also has an
index_html method? In the example below, I would want it to traverse if
the URL path had more
I'm not sure if this is taken into consideration in your work so far/future
plans... but just in case you were unaware, it is not necessary for you to
persistently store objects in the ZODB that you intend to index in a
ZCatalog. All that is required is that the object to be cataloged is
At 04:08 PM 12/10/01 +, Tony McDonald wrote:
On 10/12/01 2:54 pm, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this is taken into consideration in your work so far/future
plans... but just in case you were unaware, it is not necessary for you to
persistently store objects
At 05:58 PM 12/4/01 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I personally would like to see ZPT support plain text at some point, and it
already has some of the things necessary to do it. But that's a separate
issue from Zope 3X or Zope 3 itself.
It already can:
[example
At 03:44 PM 10/20/01 +0200, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Hi,
In a product I am writing, I am trying to add a ComputedAttribute to an
instance of a Folder descendant class.
This is the code I use:
def addComputedAttribute(self, attributeName, sourceCode):
methodName = '_ca_get%s' %
At 10:23 AM 10/12/01 -0400, Paul Everitt wrote:
Wow, this is one hell of a thread. :^)
FWIW, Grisha put a Bobo publisher in mod_python a couple of years ago.
Thus, if you like ZPublisher-style processing, you can do it in Apache via
mod_python.
Personally, I prefer to keep a process boundary
At 01:52 PM 10/11/01 +0200, Jean Jordaan wrote:
Hi all
I don't know if you're all familiar with this already, but reading
about Twisted didn't immediately bring to mind Medusa, but rather
certain aspects (specifically, *aspects*) of TransWarp, and of the
Component Architecture (interfaces).
I'm
At 08:00 AM 10/10/01 -0700, kapil thangavelu wrote:
sadly the distinction between zpublisher and zserver is nowhere near as
clean, i spent some time looking at it this morning trying to get my server
of choice using zope. i thought it would be a mid morning hack, but the rabit
hole follows the
At 01:50 PM 10/1/01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of any development going on regarding Sybase and stored
procedures? Christopher Petrilli declared them a future goal, but I urgently
need them by now. So if anybody has a workarround, please let me know.
Ty did some work on
At 03:33 PM 10/1/01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the newest version of the Sybase DA, but it doesn't seem to work.
Can you
help me finding the appropriate patches, etc? Are they available anywhere in
that CVS-tree?`
I don't think so. Ty was going to submit them to ZC for inclusion; I
At 08:03 AM 7/11/01 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
Hmm.. can you just call DataSkin.__init__(self, id) in the
File's constructor?
You might need to do it like this:
DataSkin.inheritedAttribute('__init__')(self, id)
Actually, I'm not sure you
Recently, there has been much interest (on Zope-Dev and elsewhere) in
creating Zope and Python applications from UML diagrams. Since to my
knowledge there are no other Python libraries currently available for
UML/XMI processing, I decided to get busy and release a version of
TransWarp with
At 10:35 AM 6/28/01 -0700, jimbo wrote:
I've been looking for a standard *FREE* tool that I can use to design
Zope apps. I think my search is over. It seems to be a good tool for
students because it's free and comes with support for Java, Persistence and
XMI, Full and partial exchange.
I
ZPatterns 0.4.3final contains a serious bug which deletes all ZODB-stored
contents of a Rack when you use the manage_pack method. This bug only
affects you if you store Rack-mounted objects or attributes in the ZODB,
and does not affect you if your objects are entirely contained in an RDBMS
or
At 04:58 PM 6/8/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2001 21:28, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Upon being told to perform a transaction or subtransaction commit,
the transaction would notify all the ruleAgents, and then all the
indexingAgents. Objects could still subscribe to either
At 02:07 PM 6/7/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2001 12:17, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
The
only catch was that this would still produce conflicts at the head
end of the linked list. :( Of course, that was in the days before
ZODB conflict resolution. Nowadays, you could
At 09:29 PM 6/7/01 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
If I change one property on, say, a DTML Document, does that store a whole
new copy of the document in the ZODB?
It updates the object in the ZODB. Whether that causes a copy to be made,
depends on the underlying storage. FileStorage makes
At 07:07 PM 6/7/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
That is, in ZPatterns one can specify triggers such as:
WHEN OBJECT DELETED, CHANGED CALL
someCatalog.manage_uncatalog(self.absolute_url(1))
WHEN OBJECT ADDED, CHANGED CALL
someCatalog.manage_catalog(self
At 05:48 PM 5/23/01 +0200, Christian Scholz wrote:
Hi!
It works.. partially. For some reason it looks like getPersistentItemIDs
does not always return a *complete* list. I need to run this method
several times to completely exhaust the Rack's storage. Thoughts? The
only way I ever create
At 12:33 PM 5/23/01 -0500, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
Hi Phil,
FYI.. this doesn't work in a PythonScript since indexing into a BTreeItems
is (apparently) not allowed by the Security Machinery. So... a simple
list is looking better and better! ;-)
Hmmm. Good point. I'll have to think about
At 12:26 PM 5/14/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
One would define an ObjectMappingSchema whose job it is to store and
retrieve objects of a specific type and in a specific location. It
would usually grab a database connection object to
At 05:42 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I'm not quite clear on how exactly you suggest mapping from RDMBS -
ZODB. There's a *significant* (IMHO) impedance mismatch between ZODB's
arbitrarily identified variably structured single records and SQL's
content
At 11:01 AM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Joachim Werner wrote:
The current design plans of SmartObjects are mainly based on the assumption
that we will not be able to change Zope itself. This is not a dogma for us,
however. I guess doing OR-mapping in the Zope core would be fine
At 06:00 PM 4/28/01 +0200, Christian Scholz wrote:
Hi!
First of all one note to the sql attribute provider: My problem seems to
be solved
now. Actually it was quite easy.. dunno why it took the long way.. thanks
anyway
to Phillip and Steve!
But I have another problem now: I have some rack with
At 01:37 PM 4/23/01 +0200, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Hello,
After rereading the ZopeSecurityPolicy source code, I tried the
following hack.
I add in the skinscript :
WITH 1 COMPUTE __allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__=RESULT
which does work : it fools the security mechanism.
I can
At 03:07 PM 4/22/01 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
As a simpler workaround, you can use
your_object.commitSubtransaction() instead of redirecting to a new page.
Um, this shouldn't be the issue here. _SetAttributeFor() should be called
when the attribute is set; it's not transaction-driven.
At 08:29 PM 4/22/01 +0200, Christian Scholz wrote:
Hi!
A little update..
Actually I was mistaken and SetAttributeFor() is called. Just
_objectChanged()
is not called in that case.. and thus my attributes are not stored to the
database.
When an object is newly added, only _objectAdded() is
At 08:29 PM 4/22/01 +0200, Christian Scholz wrote:
Hi!
A little update..
Actually I was mistaken and SetAttributeFor() is called. Just
_objectChanged()
is not called in that case.. and thus my attributes are not stored to the
database.
When an object is newly added, only _objectAdded() is
At 08:18 PM 4/21/01 +0200, Christian Scholz wrote:
Hi!
Good evening everybody!
I have some question regarding attribute and agent programming for
ZPatterns.
I have some provider which is registered for the "handlers" and
"attributes"
methods and some attributes.
My problem is
At 10:59 PM 4/1/01 -0700, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
1) Are there any naming conventions for SkinScripts?
Not that I'm aware of. I think Ty names all of his methods "SkinScript",
but then, he tends to name all his working/temporary files "x", so what
does he know? ;)
2) Is there any reason
At 01:45 PM 4/1/01 -0700, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
It seems as though the manage_upload method is supposed to
hand off the image data to RenderingKinds, which in turn
either replaces the image data in existing Renderings, or
creates new ones, by iterating through the rows in the
TinyTable.
At 08:59 PM 3/30/01 -0800, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
Aha. I think I understand what you're doing now. You have an "Image" and
you have a "Rendering". Two classes, different behaviors. I'm assuming
that originals and thumbnails and w
At 01:57 PM 3/29/01 -0800, John Eikenberry wrote:
We have a fairly large and complex app framework built on ZPatterns. It
uses MySQL for storage and the standard Specialist/Rack/DataSkin setup with
skinscripts for attributes and triggers.
We've found that the speed of getItem is a bit slower
At 12:19 PM 3/27/01 +0200, Bertrand Croq wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using LoginManager to authenticate users from a MySQL
database. I followed the tutorials and it works quite well; but there are
other data associated with users in the database that I would like to use in
Zope. I have found a
HTML Version (frames JavaScript required):
http://telecommunity.com/TransWarp/IPC9Talk.htm
PowerPoint Version:
http://telecommunity.com/TransWarp/IPC9Talk.ppt
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:48 PM 3/11/01 +, Steve Alexander wrote:
Is there a good reason that ExternalAttributeProvider sets up a
dictionary to put its attributes into, rather than a PersistentMapping?
It's mainly to avoid a proliferation of persistent objects, based on the
assumption that if you're using a
At 10:16 AM 3/11/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
I'm wondering where TransWarp leaves ZPatterns users. Until a couple
of weeks ago ZPatterns was the best thing to happen in the Zope world
since, well, Zope. Now it's described as a 'hack',
Those things aren't mutually exclusive, you know. :)
At 10:24 AM 3/11/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
Then I need Specialists to manage collections of PD classes. I think
that these would also benefit from being product-based, so I subclass
Specialist to create a manager for each role in the application. Now,
since an existing application might be
At 10:52 AM 3/6/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
There's actually a simpler way. Aspect objects can be pickled as long as
all the objects in them can be pickled. Which means that as long as all
their methods are Zope objects, and all the nested classe
At 03:53 PM 3/2/01 -0500, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
One reason I've been racing like mad to get the preview release out is so
that, after seeing the usefulness of TW for the Zope 3 component
architecture, y
At 12:39 PM 3/2/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
We've been separating concerns in the PTK/CMF for the last year now.
We've been moving as many responsibilities of the content objects as
possible into per-portal "service" objects. The services provide user
interface, discussion capability,
At 09:37 AM 3/1/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
This looks very interesting, Phillip. I haven't downloaded the package
yet, but I read the wiki and it finally made sense once I understood the
goal (I think): TW lets you set up the class inheritance hierarchy at
runtime. In normal OO
At 10:29 AM 2/21/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
I think I've severely misunderstood how Racks work. I thought
persistent Racks just store properties, and then use the ZClass set
in the Storage tab to wrap that data when providing it. Which means
that I can change the class set for storage and
At 05:29 PM 2/19/01 +0100, Christian Scholz wrote:
You need to use an attribute which the object has *if and only if* it
exists in the database. If the class has the attribute defined, all
instances exist, and you can't even load it with SkinScript because
ZPatterns uses __getattr__ to
At 05:50 PM 2/19/01 +0100, Christian Scholz wrote:
(though I am still confused a little, as I tried one non-existing
attribute and it didn't work. But this one also was not defined inside
the SkinScript and the database).
As I said, the attribute must exist if and only if the row is in the
At 05:25 PM 2/19/01 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Hmmm arguably a bug in ExtensionClass, but not one I'm gonna try and
fix ;-)
It's not a bug, it's a feature -- the feature that is the reason for the
very existence of ExtensionClasses in the first place: merging of the
notion of type and
At 12:51 PM 2/18/01 -0800, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
I have an existing Python Product that I would like to use
as a DataSkin in a Rack.
What do I need to change (import/subclass) in order to use
it in this way?
from ZPatterns.DataSkins import DataSkin
class MyClass(DataSkin,...all other
At 09:49 PM 2/18/01 -0800, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
Ok, assuming that the 'normal' instantiation is either
solved or a non-issue, do I need to do anything special to
get the newItem() method to call my products manage_add
method?
newItem() will not do that. A Rack's newItem() method always
At 10:47 PM 2/18/01 -0800, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
Hmm. So I need to refactor the 'manage_add' method inside
the python product into two methods, 'manage_add' which
would be used by the 'normal' object creation process and
that would also call a second 'setup' method which could be
called by
At 08:38 AM 2/4/01 -0800, Michael Bernstein wrote:
On that subject, does anyone know why SkinScripts don't
support cut-n-paste or copy-n-paste?
'cause I never thought of implementing it, probably because I've never yet
needed to move a SkinScript. Patches cheerfully accepted. :)
At 07:12 PM 1/21/01 +, Steve Alexander wrote:
So, storing things in a Rack happens in a number of stages:
Your application interacts with the Rack
The Rack (perhaps) stores the object persistently in its BTree
The BTree is a collection of persistent ZODB objects
The ZODB objects
At 06:38 PM 1/7/01 -0800, John Eikenberry wrote:
Anyways... I want to be able to support both cookie based auth and basic
auth. With cookie based auth being the default unless they don't have
cookies (either because they have them turned off, behind a proxy filter,
etc), in which case they
At 09:41 AM 1/19/01 -0500, Aaron Payne wrote:
At 09:38 AM 1/19/01 -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Thus, your
SkinScript is running as anonymous, and probably doesn't have rights to
access the SQL method.
You might need to change the proxy roles setting on
the SkinScript method so that when
At 04:41 PM 1/17/01 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
I don't have the slightest idea what you're trying to accomplish here - I
probably missed the beginning of this thread. Do you want to change the
way the specialist processes the string "dataskin1", or the way dataskin1
processes the URL
It sounds to me like you're trying to have SkinScript supply a
bobo_traverse for the Specialist itself, and this you cannot do. (There
are other ways to change a Specialist's bobo_traverse behavior, but
SkinScript is not one of them.) The SkinScript you're doing is meaningful
only if you want
At 12:49 AM 1/6/01 +, Steve Alexander wrote:
WHEN OBJECT ADDED, CHANGED CALL self.ensure_conditions_hold()
I write the ensure_conditions_hold method so that it returns None if
everything is ok, but raises an exception if there is a problem with the
new state of the object.
That's all
At 06:03 PM 1/4/01 +, Steve Alexander wrote:
I think what is happening in the broken example is that when the zope
security machinery asks for __roles__, name is also computed. The
machinery must request __roles__ before changing anything.
The behavior is as documented, though I'm not
At 05:15 PM 1/3/01 +, Chris Withers wrote:
What I'd like:
'Zope' objects of type 'X', which can have multiple parents and can
contain other objects of type 'X', where storage isn't necessarily tied
to the ZODB but where the objects have a normal properties page (in
terms of use, again, it'd
At 03:08 PM 1/2/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
"Itai" == Itai Tavor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Itai Maybe with this
Itai SkinScript: WITH Doers.getItem(self.doerID) CALCULATE
Itai self.doerID=RESULT.id or '' ? But I'm not really sure about
At 05:13 PM 12/21/00 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
I think you're right about this being an OrderLineItem. A couple of fine
points, however... First, I don't think there needs to be an
"OrderLineItemsWithGraphic" specialist, since there is nothing else that
would talk to it. It's fine in this case
At 04:21 PM 12/18/00 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
This is how I see it:
- Products Specialist
productRack
customizableProductRack
- OrderLineItem Specialist
lineItemRack
lineItemWithGraphicRack
- product.addMeToOrder():
order.addLineItem(product_id=id, add='lineItem')
-
At 02:49 PM 12/14/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
after a while I think I got it now.
I use a FcWS as a Folder like usual in Zope and if i create an object
of a type which is "customized" certain attributes will be set through
the customizer.
Yes.
so for a database app that handles multiple
At 02:42 PM 12/14/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
As part of a Customer Relationship Management system our company is
developing, we have a Licenses specialist which manages product licenses.
All license objects do not have the same attributes however. The various
attributes relating to
At 06:31 PM 12/13/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
after one more day of source-code-reading i got that far:
When I want to use a Folder /w Customizer (FwCS) I cannot/don't need to use
Specialists.
Not to store your objects, no. You can still use Specialists to
concentrate search methods,
At 08:04 PM 12/12/00 -0500, BS wrote:
Do DataSkins have ownership? I want to give multiple users the ability to
add objects to a rack and only allow the 'owner' to view/edit the object.
When a user adds a DataSkin to a rack does he get ownership of the object?
I can't seem to get the ownership
At 09:44 PM 12/5/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
If you want to store one DataSkin inside another, where either one of them
is stored in a Rack, you will have to create appropriate SkinScript or
custom attribute providers to do so.
But what if I always store dataskins in there own racks but
At 10:07 AM 12/1/00 +0100, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
this works fine. Now I wanted to have attributes which I don't want to
display in the form, for example complete attribute. I therefore created
another dataskin propersheet Internal in AZ with a property complete
and tried to set it with:
At 08:10 AM 11/30/00 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
I don't think Data.fs will go away. I do expect it to be relagated to
initial evaluation and development projects. Use of Berkely DB in
transactional mode requires a significant andminstration commitment.
Log files need to be purged. Backup and
At 04:39 PM 11/30/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
I've a db_sequence specialist who serves the Framework with
db_id's for new Records like:
May I suggest calling your Specialist "Sequences" or "Counters" since it appears that it returns objects which produce sequential integer values?
At 06:19 PM 11/29/00 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the right way to implement a set of classes
and roles in ZPatterns. I asked some questions about this a while
ago, and then went away and did some learning, but I'm stuck again
and I'm afraid I need to ask more
At 02:34 PM 11/27/00 -0800, Ben Schochet wrote:
Seems that way Steve.
I have tried to do this in an external method with
self.get_transaction.commit(1) before doing the changeProperties, but that
didn't seem to work.
You want get_transaction().commit(1), if you're doing it from Python.
At 08:34 PM 11/27/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Phillip. Is there a way to pass my REQUEST info to the ADD
Trigger?
I am under the impression that only "self" and some other ZPattern
specific properties are available to the trigger.
You also have access to everything in the
At 10:29 AM 11/22/00 +0100, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
I created a FwCS and in it a customizer, but in my list of to customize
object types are only meta_types listed, which have the Base class
"_ZClass_for_DataSkin",. Is this a requirement, and if yes, is there a way
to add this to existing
At 12:41 PM 11/22/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
I have a specialist Contacts and for Contacts I have a method
getAllContactsForCustomer. Whenever I want to call this method I have to
pass on the whole namespace and the object itself to get it to work eg:
getAllContactsForCustomer(this(), _,
At 10:21 AM 11/22/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for answering Steve.
Unfortunitly I am working with version 0.3 of ZPatterns so I have
to use GAP.
When I try to translate your Skinscript into GAP like this
"attrsexprs:account_object=(RESULT is _.None) and NOT_FOUND or
RESULT"
At 11:08 AM 11/21/00 +0100, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
I have an existing ZClass/Data Structure like this
RecruitingPlatform
Company
Recruiting
Candidates
Student
Profiles
Address
Highschool
IT
Jobprefs
...
I want to store the data in the ZClass
At 02:46 PM 11/16/00 +, Chris Withers wrote:
To put it another way, could you have a FwCS that provided soem
properties and let another FwCS further up the acquisition tree supply
the rest?
Nope. But there's nothing stopping you from writing a new version of the
"link to parent providers"
At 11:14 AM 11/15/00 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Thanks... I guess the behavior that was associated with
ObjectManager.NOT_REPLACEABLE is obtained by just not havign a
__replaceable__ attribute?
..or does ObjectManager.NOT_REPLACEABLE exist, just in an undocumented
fashion ;-)
Also, when is
At 05:51 PM 11/13/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
Should I still set up a rack and set it's storage to the Customer ZClass and
add a skinscript method to copy attributes from the Customer specialist?
or
Should I simply write a method for Requester, getRequester, which asks the
Customers
At 01:37 PM 11/13/00 -0500, Dan L. Pierson wrote:
I've been trying to get Membership 0.7.6 working with
LoginManager-0-8-8b1 (and it's associated ZPatterns) under Zope 2.2.2
on RedHat 6.2. After probing around it seems that there is a problem
storing member passwords. The following trace from
At 04:14 PM 11/13/00 -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
I want a specialist to have two (or more hypotheticaly) racks, and each
rack is to contain one type of object. I then want to be able to add
objects.
I have the two racks set up, but I am unclear as to how to specify that
I want to add an item
At 09:18 AM 11/9/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
I set "loaded by accessing attribute" to the attribute "id".
You should only do that if you want an "infinite rack". That is, one which
contains all possible objects. Using "id" means that if the Rack tries to
see if an object exists, it will
At 10:45 AM 11/9/00 +0100, Rik Hoekstra wrote:
[rh]I've been following this thread. This may be a bit of a newbie question,
but it's been bugging me for a while. I see how I can store propertysheets
in Racks using ZClasses and Skinscripts, but the propertysheet term suggests
that there should
At 06:10 PM 11/8/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
In Rack.py I noticed the following:
a = self.loadAttrib
if not a:
slot = self._writeableSlot(key)
slot[SelfKey] = item.aq_base# strip acquisition wrapping
item._setSlot(slot) #
Jeff,
The behavior is exactly the same with a "plain" Zope User Folder. It also
has nothing to do with acquisition, at least not in the way you think.
The problem is that a user who is defined in a subfolder is *not* granted
roles to any folder above them. This means that they have no access
At 01:01 PM 11/7/00 +0200, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
I created a couple of ZClasses based on Dataskin.
In the way I grok ZOPE, properties that are objects can not go onto property
sheets. So if I have a Customer ZClass that has a property Address (a
property that is an object) then I would create
At 05:39 PM 11/6/00 -0800, John Eikenberry wrote:
The base DataSkin will be in a Rack. Would there be any issues in making
the embedded DataSkins (contained on the base DataSkins) use this Rack as
well? Seems like it might result in the confusion about which DataSkin a
PlugIn on the Rack worked
At 05:19 PM 11/1/00 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
Ok... I think I get the "Specialist per role, not per class" part.
But I still can't make the jump from a class diagram to a
ZClass/Specialist setup.
A class diagram contains all the roles - they're the lines between the
classes. :)
Look at it
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
