Please keep any discussion on the mailinglist. It is rude to
approach ppl in private about problems that are not directly related
to their contributions to the community.
-aj
Forwarded Message
Date: 23. August 2006 09:21:59 -0400
From: beno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi;
On this page (of a Zope product):
http://iungo.org/products/MailBoxer/
there is the instruction to send an email to this address:
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What exactly does that mean? Can someone give me an example?
TIA,
beno
|
___
Zope maillist -
Antonio Beamud Montero wrote at 2006-8-22 19:45 +0200:
...
I do not understand what you precisely want to achieve.
However, you could get something like the example in your
original post by:
* define macroB at the page level (it uses macroA)
* make your former macroB a macroC
--On 23. August 2006 13:38:10 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
On this page (of a Zope product):
http://iungo.org/products/MailBoxer/
there is the instruction to send an email to this address:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What exactly does that mean? Can someone give me an example?
The docs
Hi, hopefully
someone can help me out, I have a html form that calls an asp file stored in the
root of my plone site. When i click on the submit button which calls this asp
file, it returns back the asp file in text format on my ie. Is there a plugin
that i need to get in order to have asp
--On 23. August 2006 14:11:16 -0400 Siddharth Sethi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, hopefully someone can help me out, I have a html form that calls an
asp file stored in the root of my plone site. When i click on the submit
button which calls this asp file, it returns back the asp file in
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. August 2006 13:38:10 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi;
On this page (of a Zope product):
http://iungo.org/products/MailBoxer/
there is the instruction to send an email to this address:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What exactly does that mean? Can someone give me an
--On 23. August 2006 14:34:43 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it so hard to understand to replace the example email address with
the one you have configured for your Mailboxer?
Well, the list is called rejoice, the Web site in question is called
rejoice.2012.vi and I tried this
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas
Jung, who responds, clogs things up, and provides no useful information.
On this page (of a Zope product):
http://iungo.org/products/MailBoxer/
there is the instruction to send an email to this address:
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Aug 2006, at 20:52, beno wrote:
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT
Andreas Jung, who responds, clogs things up, and provides no useful
information.
That's because your questions show such a fundamental lack of
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas
Jung AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and provide no
useful information.
On this page (of a Zope product):
http://iungo.org/products/MailBoxer/
there is the instruction to send an email to this address:
--On 23. August 2006 15:14:15 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas Jung
AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and provide no
useful information.
Could someone kick this guy from the list? We don't need such
+---[ beno ]--
| I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas
| Jung AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and provide no
| useful information.
|
| On this page (of a Zope product):
| http://iungo.org/products/MailBoxer/
| there is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're really not going to win any friends, or get any help, with this
approach.
Sometimes it's the only way to get past the arrogant belligerent list
subscribers who choose to make miserable the lives of those of us who
ask questions they consider stupid :) And it
At Wednesday 23/8/2006 16:14, beno wrote:
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas
Jung AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and
provide no useful information.
It's difficult when you not even know how an email address looks
like... Try to get
+---[ beno ]--
|
| Thank you for responding. Here is my question once again:
Since you haven't worked out yet, I'll be explicit.
Reposting your question over and over and over and over and over isn't going
to get you any more responses. In fact it's more likely to piss
--On 23. August 2006 16:42:06 -0300 Gabriel Genellina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Wednesday 23/8/2006 16:14, beno wrote:
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas
Jung AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and
provide no useful information.
It's
--On 23. August 2006 15:36:16 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're really not going to win any friends, or get any help, with this
approach.
Sometimes it's the only way to get past the arrogant belligerent list
subscribers who choose to make miserable the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Aug 2006, at 21:18, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. August 2006 15:14:15 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT
Andreas Jung
AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and
+---[ Jens Vagelpohl ]--
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
|
| On 23 Aug 2006, at 21:18, Andreas Jung wrote:
|
| Could someone kick this guy from the list? We don't need such
| idiots here.
|
| On other lists they call people like these trolls I
--On 24. August 2006 05:59:46 +1000 Andrew Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+---[ Jens Vagelpohl ]--
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
|
| On 23 Aug 2006, at 21:18, Andreas Jung wrote:
|
| Could someone kick this guy from the list? We don't need
beno wrote:
As far as Andreas' comment of switching to Mailman, dunno why, but
Mailman requires cgi scripts, and I use Pound as reverse proxy directly
to Zope,
Why don't you use Apache, like every other sane individual out there?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python
beno wrote:
Hi;
The creator of this Product hasn't returned my email, so I am asking the
list for help. I have done the following:
Why don't you just use mailman?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Siddharth Sethi wrote:
And i currently have no firewall running too.
Sounds like you should find a mailing list for Enfold Proxy.
Personally, I'd just put Apache in front of both Zope and IIS...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
Chris Withers wrote:
beno wrote:
As far as Andreas' comment of switching to Mailman, dunno why, but
Mailman requires cgi scripts, and I use Pound as reverse proxy
directly to Zope,
Why don't you use Apache, like every other sane individual out there?
Actually, there are a *lot* of people
Hi Chris,
Chris Withers wrote:
Personally, I'd just put Apache in front of both Zope and IIS...
Me too - simpler, better documented, safer.
(Having seen a server wiped out via an IIS security hole, I just don't
trust it on a public IP - long time ago, but once bitten, twice shy!)
--
Andrew Milton wrote:
Trolls are people who post contraversial items for the sole purpose of
eliciting responses.
Yeah, that's me ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope
Hi,
beno wrote:
Apache duplicates 95% of what Zope's server does, so if you're only
using Zope, then it's un-elegant to use Apache.
Not so - Apache is a mature production web server, Zope is an
application server that serves over HTTP, but it's HTTP server is *not*
designed for production use.
beno wrote:
I would appreciate anyone's response to this question EXCEPT Andreas
Jung AND/OR Jens Vagenpohl, who respond, clogs things up, and provide no
useful information.
right numbnuts, you're not really getting the picture are you?
Are you paying anyone on this list to help you? no?
beno wrote:
Sometimes it's the only way to get past the arrogant belligerent list
subscribers who choose to make miserable the lives of those of us who
ask questions they consider stupid :) And it worked, didn't it?
Er, yeah, right, like you're going to understand any of the help you've
been
beno wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
beno wrote:
As far as Andreas' comment of switching to Mailman, dunno why, but
Mailman requires cgi scripts, and I use Pound as reverse proxy
directly to Zope,
Why don't you use Apache, like every other sane individual out there?
Actually, there are a *lot*
Hi Chris,
Chris Withers wrote:
numpty.
That is /such/ a great word!
--
Regards,
PhilK
Human language continually changes, innit.
- Stephen Juan
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts
Philip Kilner wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
numpty.
That is /such/ a great word!
My thanks to Tim Penhey for re-introducing me to it :-)
*grinz*
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: Philip Kilner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] MailBoxer Question
Hi Chris,
Chris Withers wrote:
numpty.
That is /such/ a great word!
Hi Chris,
Chris Withers wrote:
numpty.
That is /such/ a great word!
My thanks to Tim Penhey for re-introducing me to it :-)
First said to me by a distressed Scots techie - Is that guy a numpty,
or what?, and I hear it in my head in a Scots accent to this day.
UrbanDictionary.com has
- Original Message -
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] MailBoxer Question
Philip Kilner wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
numpty.
That is /such/ a great word!
Jonathan wrote:
P.S. Quite a propos in this particular instance.
Especially the 2nd definition...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
Philip Kilner wrote:
Hi,
beno wrote:
Apache duplicates 95% of what Zope's server does, so if you're only
using Zope, then it's un-elegant to use Apache.
Not so - Apache is a mature production web server, Zope is an
application server that serves over HTTP, but it's
Log message for revision 69744:
Include overrides for non-Products
Changed:
U Products.Five/branches/1.4/skel/site.zcml
-=-
Modified: Products.Five/branches/1.4/skel/site.zcml
===
---
Log message for revision 69748:
point externals at a branch
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/lib/python/Products/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/lib/python/Products
___
Name:
Log message for revision 69749:
adding explicit package arg
Changed:
U Products.Five/branches/whitmo-15-layers/viewlet/tests.py
-=-
Modified: Products.Five/branches/whitmo-15-layers/viewlet/tests.py
===
---
Log message for revision 69755:
separating server start into own layer
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/testWebserver.py
-=-
Modified:
Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/testWebserver.py
Log message for revision 69756:
fixing up issues when all test run
- new layer for testing webserver
todo: fix sessions in sanboxs
rename Zope2Layer
Changed:
U Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/layer.py
U
From what I can tell the feature that is Hotfixed does not appear
until Zope 2.7.3. If the Hotfix is installed in Zope 2.7.0 through to
2.7.2 then it shows up as a broken product. No real harm done.
The product import breaks with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
What's up with zopefoundation.org - especially since it's changed since I
looked at it yesterday? :P)
We were making sure zopefoundation.org points to
www.zope.org/foundation. zopefoundation.org was on a completely separate
system that Mark Pratt was kind enough to set
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
I'm here. I'll tweak the design per the suggestions below and send it
out. I actually worked on another one since then. Ill send that out as
well.
Tom, you're awesome! Thanks!
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-web maillist -
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 8/22/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I propose letting www.zope.org/foundation point to a Apache directory,
where we maintain HTML files. We will then generate such HTML files from
restructured text we maintain in the zope SVN repository, using a
[taking people off the cc list, changing the title]
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
http://modscape.com/zope
I added Design 2. I like it much better than Design 1. I think we
should work off of Design 2 Thoughts?
Hey, great!
I'm afraid I prefer design 1, myself. :) What do you like better about
On 8/23/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think it's faster to get going with this.
OK. We can always switch. I have a mantra: If it works now, then use
it. This means to never hold out for something that might be better
in the future, because it aint gonna happen. :)
On 8/23/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[taking people off the cc list, changing the title]
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
http://modscape.com/zope
I added Design 2. I like it much better than Design 1. I think we
should work off of Design 2 Thoughts?
Hey, great!
I'm afraid I
On 8/23/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think?
What you said. :-)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
___
Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
On 23 Aug 2006, at 12:57, Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
http://modscape.com/zope
I added Design 2. I like it much better than Design 1. I think
we should work off of Design 2 Thoughts?
My vote is for Design 1. IMHO Design 2 gives me this gut feeling of a
site that wants to be overly flashy
Mark Pratt wrote:
[snip]
Doesn't matter what system is used but we certainly have less than
before -- unless anybody considers a zope.org page with 8 pdf downloads
progress.
I agree we have less than before, sorry. Then again, before we had two
foundation websites with diverging information,
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
Looks like the first design is the preferred one.
Okay, let's stick with design 1 then, it appears we got a consensus
about this from looking at the thread.
Maybe I just liked the
second because it was the most recent. You're points below are all good.
I'll try
Hi there,
We seem to be making good process on layout and technology. Now as to
contents. What should the Zope Foundation website contain?
Right now we have a whole bunch of PDFs, some describe rules for the
foundation (bylaws, intellectual property policy), some of these are
signable
Hi there,
This would seem to be low-hanging fruit, as it already works.
Right now we have planetzope.org. It'd be nice if we could put this
under planet.zope.org.
We seem to have two alternatives: make planet.zope.org point directly to
planetzope.org by doing something DNSy, or
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
This would seem to be low-hanging fruit, as it already works.
Right now we have planetzope.org. It'd be nice if we could put this
under planet.zope.org.
We seem to have two alternatives: make planet.zope.org point directly to
planetzope.org by doing
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I propose we use Tom Von Lahndorff's design for the foundation website.
For the purposes of the foundation site we should strip it down:
+lots
* possibly no drop-down menus at the top. We could simply have links
there, or possibly a standard left-hand side navigation.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I agree we have less than before, sorry. Then again, before we had two
foundation websites with diverging information, and now we have one, so
that's progress. :)
+1
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
59 matches
Mail list logo
