Dne 17.10.2009 3:46, Russell napsal(a):
As an open source initiative I would wonder why anyone would want to remove
choices and force an 'all or nothing' approach? That's more typical of companies
like A$$ple, Micro$$oft and Ado$$e who use that to lock users into using only
their product and make themselves wealthier as a result. It would be sad if the
final release of SM 2.0 did not offer the same tradition of choice as in the
Exactly my words, thak you Russell for saying that, now I see I'm not
the only one with that opinion.
I understand that SM is "suite". I already reconciled with grinding my
teeth that there would be no way _not_ to install the internal e-mail
client (and don't say something about disk space, because it is not
about disk space, it is like the inability to remove radio from my car
and when I want to use another, I just install it and cover the first
one with towel), but the inability _not to use_ the internal mail client
drives me crazy and makes me more like leaving SM at all. Still no
success with "network.protocol-handler.expose.mailto", even when I set
another mail client as default, mailto links in SM (2 RC2) still
launches mail wizard from SM. Sad.
Anyway, many thanks to all developers of SM for the big work that has
been done on SM 2.0.
support-seamonkey mailing list