Bill,
Right, let go of everything. No attachments. Only this....
Edgar
On Sep 5, 2008, at 10:17 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Edgar and JMJM,
As regards to JMJM's comment about '...Zen may have lost a major
part of Chan in Japan.', I say GOOD! The less the better! Put in
down, put it all down! ONLY THIS!
...Bill!
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jue Miao Jing Ming - ????
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Zen] Character Building
Edgar, Thank you for the confirmation. I have to leave now. Will
address this issue deeper when I have more time. It is most
important. In short Zen may have lost a major part of Chan in
Japan. JM.
Edgar Owen wrote:
Donald,
I don't think Zen pays much attention to karma. Zen certainly
doesn't accept reincarnation which is how karma is typically
transmitted according to traditional Buddhist thought. Zen is more
about dealing with the present however it may appear. Nor does Zen
posit any after death states such as nirvana or supernatural Buddha
realms (though in early Chan there are passing references to such
when discussing earlier texts). Zen is all about the here now,
there is zero supernatural element to Zen.
Zen does accept that right action facilitates enlightenment in this
lifetime though.
Edgar
On Sep 3, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 wrote:
Hi Al,
I don't know whether the "other guy" you were talking about is
Donald Hwong. I am Donald Hwong. I switched my email to my Dharma
Name, JMJM. A dharma name is a name given by my teacher as a
recognition for the world of dharma. We have approximately 50
people with dharma names in our school with about 50,000
practitioners in all. We are probably the largest at-home
practitioner group that I know, meaning without temple, formality,
words, rules, etc.
I am one of the two teachers in the US. I am in charge of the
English classes. We have about 6 classes in Los Angeles. However, I
am still learning. I don't consider my English is sufficient, nor
my sharing of Chan has any value. I have been called many titles,
including a monk with hair. None of these are necessary. A lot of
times, I don't even like to sign off on my post. Honestly, there is
nothing to learn, nothing to master. We had all within us.
I have been with your group and other groups for about 5-6 years
now. What I have learned is that the concept of karma and cause and
effect are not taught in the Zen. At least, the Roshi in the other
group openly stated so.
Without the correct understanding of karma and cause and effect,
and the proper practice to witness it, there is no way to rid of
the karma. It seems to me, after reading off/online for about 7-8
years, Zen differs from Chan in the fact Zen has no spiritual
power. It is just a mental exercise without any connection to the
life forces of the universe. I do hope that I am limited in my scope.
To be enlightened, surpass the three realms is the first step, they
are the realm of Desire, Form and the Formless. Or in short the
karmic hindrances to body, mind and spirit. Karma is not a theory.
It is a force, we can sense, process, transfer, etc. Without a
practice to rid of karma, we still can suffer from sickness,
(bodily karma), mental anguish (mind karma) and accidents
(spiritual karma).
Just some observations to share.
Fitness63 wrote:
By the way, are you a Roshi or a monk or a sensei? I am sorry that
I may sound disrespectful to you and the other guy (forgot who he
was), but this forum has been in existence around ten years and
there have been a lot of people claiming to be senseis or monks and
sometimes they were not and sometimes they were and unfortunately
they usually had their feelings hurt and left so whenever I do not
see you post I presume you already gave up and left. Apparently the
other guy did as he has not posted in a long time.
Thank you for giving so much, this is character building though
some call it abuse.
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Zen] Sick of Flaming
Chan is One, the big One. The One which supports everything visible
and
invisible on an equal basis without preference. The fact that each
tree grows differently maybe obvious to our eyes, but the causes of
their differences are difficult to see. Often, instead of pondering on
the cause, and causes of causes of their difference, we label these
trees by comparing them and deluded to believe that our labels were
real.
Every incident, encounter, formation and phenomenon in our lives
are the
result of some causes, and each cause are often caused by
generations of
causes. It is our purpose, as Chan practitioners, to
satisfy/consummate/resolve/ferry each one, such that this karma
does not
propagate. This the "first act of perfection" -- giving. Not judging,
categorizing, filing away, ignoring, but giving.
It is our practice to recognize the variations of cause and effect and
learn from them to resolve/satisfy externally as well as make peace
internally, such that our spirituality is strengthened and enhanced.
Lotus does not grow from clean water. The bigger the mud, the bigger
the lotus.
Let us do it together.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Cynthia,
>
> The only thing that can be done to stop the flaming is to turn this
> forum into a fully moderated forum in which the moderator - Al -
reads
> and approves postings before allowing them on the forum. Al could
also
> probably block some contributors, but they could get around this
very
> easily by just registering as a different name.
>
> A fully moderated forum has a lot of drawbacks:
> - it's a LOT OF WORK for the moderator
> - it slows down posting exchanges
> - it gives the power of censorship to the moderator - which in this
> case is Al, whom I'm comfortable with, but it's always a bone of
> contention
> - there are probably more drawbacks that I haven't thought of...
>
> I think it would be better to keep the forum open and just censor
the
> postings yourself - by using your delete key.
>
> Also, and maybe the best suggestion, is we could all help reduce the
> flaming by not responding to flames - which I am guilty of. I do
that
> because flaming doesn't bother me. Not responding would reduce the
> reason to flame because there would be no indignant reaction to fuel
> the flames.
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> Al, this topic keeps coming up. What do you think?
>
> ...Bill!
>
> From: [email protected] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Cynthia-Graphic
> Significance Music
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 2:55 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Zen] Sick of Flaming
>
> I just want the flaming to stop. How can we get that crap off the
group?
>
> Cynthia
>
>
> __________ NOD32 3401 (20080829) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com <http://www.eset.com>
>
>
__________ NOD32 3401 (20080829) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
