JMJM,

I am not the one who first brought up the subject of spirituality and 
used that term in these posts.  That was you.

It all started in you post 11750 on 04Sep when you posted: "I suspect 
that Zen is just a mental balancing excercise
without spirituality."  That generated a lot of posting activity from 
many people, including me lauding that assertion.

You then started this particular thread in post 11814 on 07 Sep that 
has 'true spirituality' in the title.  (That begs the question 
what 'false spirituality' is, but I didn't ask that of you.)

To answer you present question, I beleive all spirituality is maya, 
so I really don't know how to define it any more detailed than that.  
All spirituality is an illusion - true spirituality, false 
sprituality, blue sprituality, bad sprituality, etc...

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill, What is your definition of spiritualism & spirituality in the 
> common day context? Thanks, JM
> 
> Bill Smart wrote:
> >
> > JMJM,
> >
> > Thanks for your clarifications.
> >
> > Much of your description of Chi below sounds like Buddha Nature as
> > that term is used in English translations of Japanese Zen Buddhist
> > writings. Are you aware of this, and is there indeed a difference 
or
> > are these two concepts the pretty much the same?
> >
> > Your comments about how people can use Chi are good examples of 
the
> > spritualism I reject and classify as maya, but they're 
entertaining
> > to think about.
> >
> > ...Bill!
> >
> > --- In [email protected] <mailto:Zen_Forum%
40yahoogroups.com>, 
> > Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
> > <chan.jmjm@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Good questions Bill,
> > >
> > > Chi is pronounced Cheee. In Japnese it is pronounced Ki, like
> > ReiKi.
> > > In new Chinese, it is spelled Qi, but pronounced the same.
> > >
> > > #2 is the detailed answer. Chi is the universal life force and
> > > therefore it is always one and connected. Yet, it could be
> > blocked. If
> > > it were blocked in our body, like teachings of QiGong or
> > acupuncture,
> > > then we become sick or injured. It if blocks our mind, we 
becomes
> > > crazy. These blockages are called karma in Buddhist terms and 
just
> > > blockage in traditional Chinese medicine.
> > >
> > > Because Chi is pure energy, not visible, not in any form. There
> > are
> > > occasion people take vantage of its illusiveness. So beware, as
> > pointed
> > > out by Edgar. Some martial artists can hurt you even without
> > touching
> > > you. Doctors can heal you also without touching you. I have had
> > both
> > > type of experiences many times.
> > >
> > > Sometimes, Chi is used as a descriptor. For instance, your Chi 
is
> > bad,
> > > meaning you don't look too well. This calligraphy has no chi,
> > meaning,
> > > it flows bad.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you have any other question.
> > > JM
> > >
> > > Bill Smart wrote:
> > > >
> > > > JMJM,
> > > >
> > > > You wrote:
> > > > --- In [email protected] 
> > <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:Zen_Forum%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙
ç²¾æËÅ"Ž
> > > > <chan.jmjm@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Chi of us can be connected to Chi of others only if we 
don't
> > > > use our
> > > > > mind, eyes, mouth, nose, etc.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think maybe some of our difficulty in communicating comes 
down
> > to
> > > > word usage.
> > > >
> > > > In the above sentence, do you mean:
> > > >
> > > > 1. I have my Chi and you have your Chi, but the Chi's are not 
now
> > > > connected, and the only way (or at least part of the way) I 
can
> > > > connect to your Chi is to not use my senses?
> > > >
> > > > 2. Or...I have Chi and you have Chi, and the Chi is the same 
Chi
> > so
> > > > by definition is already connected, but the only way I can 
sense
> > or
> > > > become aware of that connection is to not use my senses?
> > > >
> > > > 3. Or...something else?
> > > >
> > > > Also, is 'Chi' pronouced 'chee' (like the first part 
of 'cheese',
> > > > or 'key' with a hard 'c' pronounced like 'k'; and is it also
> > > > sometimes rendered into English as 'Qi'?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks...Bill!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to