idn't we all learned the
exponential graph of EMC costs versus development time ?
If you need proof (for authorities, or for yourself), nothing can
replace the actual test.
Gert Gremmen
On 6-4-2024 0:47, Lfresearch wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to advise a client at where to draw the line on what nee
they are fit for an EU membership (even
if local politics dare/won't not say the "join" word yet)
Gert Gremmen
On 22-3-2024 7:53, Kurt Beneder wrote:
Dear Gilbert,
One Soulution could be:
You have to include the whole list of all separate orderable spare
part modules to your CE D
n
(button changed color), or even batch or serial numbering. No risk
shall be considered to be too small not to be included in the analysis.
The difference is in how the risks are addressed. This will avoid having
a too extensive safety warning section, and at the same time the
requirements of any a
Hi Scott
The OJ itself lists the required dates in he table of publication.
Gert Gremmen
On 30-8-2022 15:41, Scott Xe wrote:
On 16 Aug, the captioned HS was listed in OJ. Does it replace the
previous version immediately or is there a transitional period?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
Hi Brain
Method #1 and #2 are equivalent (if the were the same standard):
#2 list 3 documents that -once merged- form one harmonised standard
#1 list the original standard plus the applicable harmonised amendment
Method 3 is not recommended IMHO.
Gert gremmen
On 24-8-2022 21:48, Brian
for Corrigendum, most used for plain error, typos ,wrong
references etc.
There is lots of info on the site of CENELEC on these subjects. Worth so
spent an afternoon.
Gert Gremmen
On 24-8-2022 15:06, Scott Xe wrote:
EN 55032 : 2017/A11 : 2020
--
Independent Expert on CE marking
EMC Consultant
e are more requirements than just clearance and creepage.
Good luck in making your equipment safe.
Gert Gremmen
On 18-8-2022 21:43, bart.de.gee...@telenet.be wrote:
Dear experts,
A client is looking for regulatory guidance to CE certify a high
voltage output supply (with regular AC mains 230V/
s laid out in Article 17.
Best regards
Charlie**
**
*Charlie Blackham*
*Sulis Consultants Ltd*
*Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
*Web: **https://sulisconsultants.com/* <https://sulisconsultants.com/>**
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
*From:*Gert Gremmen
*Sent:* 26 March 2022 10:0
to support 2 tests can be quite challenging, if this needs to be precise
and exhaustive. Gert Gremmen
On 26-3-2022 11:50, John Woodgate wrote:
The 'state of the art' is quite likely to have moved on in less than 3
years. It's also possible that EU legislation has changed during that
time.
-
re exhaustive and precise, contain no duplicates to
EU legislation, and are to the state of the art. In some cases a
normatively referenced standard can block harmonisation if the
referenced standard has severe deficiencies.) Gert Gremmen
On 26-3-2022 9:21, T.Sato wrote:
Although non-harmoni
saves money.
The situation changes in 6 or 8 layer PCBS. There you will couple to the
closest
groundplane using buried vias only.
The generic answer is : control your return current, and avoid ambiguities.
Gert Gremmen
On 18-3-2020 9:38, Amund Westin wrote:
Let’s say, part of a pcb stack
).
By placing impedance in series with each input/output/supply the effects
will already greatly be reduced.
Do not rely on feedback mechanism for this so the 47 pF will do a great
job until the max freq of the opamp is exceeded.
Gert Gremmen
On 19-2-2020 13:11, John Woodgate wrote:
I see two
for signal routing, as a Sbott3?
Mvh Amund
*Fra:*Gert Gremmen
*Sendt:* 10. februar 2020 09:57
*Til:* Amund Westin ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Emne:* Re: [PSES] PCB layout technique - multilayer
Just 2 hints of thousands:
If you implement 2 ground planes make sure the ground references on
top
on
board edges
If you implement SMPS locally give it a local top layer ground area to
connect the principal
switch elements together. Connect by a dice pattern 5 via to main GND
Good luck.
Gert Gremmen
On 10-2-2020 8:27, Amund Westin wrote: contact to the nearest ground layer,
I’m looking
These are phrases with a high degree of conformal viability, but most
companies using this Route A (SME's) do not have the slightest idea how
to start "a quality system that entails"
In practice this can be done by :
* Have the product be approved according to one or more harmonised
ge history in Annex D in any of the 3 versions above.
Gert Gremmen
On 17-9-2019 15:11, micha...@acbcert.com wrote:
Hi Charlie,
The last presentation from ETSI that I recall on the topic, stated
that we should be looking at EN 301 489-1 V2.x.x and newer. We
should not be considering the old EN
Hi Charlie
That version of the standard 301-489-1 V2.2.1 has not yet been approved,
yet published, so be careful
For now keep relying on V1.9.2 , that does not mention your text on
industrial environment, and that has not yet been cited under the RED
either.
Gert Gremmen
On 17-9-2019
Body otherwise.
Gert Gremmen
On 17-9-2019 8:48, John Woodgate wrote:
Not exactly. The question was strictly about 'Class', which of course
can mean different things in different standards, but my answer is, I
think, correct for Europe. Intentional radiation is excluded from the
CISPR standards
know?
Regards
Charlie
*Charlie Blackham*
*Sulis Consultants Ltd*
*Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*
*Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ *
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
*From:*Gert Gremmen
*Sent:* 24 August 2019 13:27
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] Relaxation
settled to grow into myths.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-08-24 12:32, Gert Gremmen wrote:
John
Nice to agree then. :-)
The new assessment system has needed fine tuning during quite a
period, and some
been ruled that 'manufacturer' cannot be
mentioned at all.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-08-24 11:51, Gert Gremmen wrote:
These very high standards (as you call it) are just part of the
requirements as given in ER3, f
that is not a realistic minimum
requirement as the equipment was for outdoor use, so it was suggested to
add a minimum range more representative to EU climates.
John, thanks for your opinion anyway (but feel free to continue the
discussions)
Gert Gremmen
On 24-8-2019 10:53, John Woodgate
standards, in the light of creating HS with
legal effects.
Gert Gremmen
--
Independent Expert on CE marking
Harmonised Standards (HAS-) Consultant @ European Commission for RED and EMC
EMC Consultant
Electrical Safety
Thank you Rich,
Congrats with your IEEE medal, i am sure you merited it !
Thanks for the comma document.
Gert Gremmen
On 23-8-2019 20:34, Richard Nute wrote:
The case of the missing Oxford comma.
https://annhandley.com/oxford-comma/
The comma wasn’t missing; it was deliberately omitted
O-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-08-23 12:25, Gert Gremmen wrote:
Hi John,
Great many thank's ;<)
I will study them and use them for the benefit of standardization.
You must be aware of Internal Regulations 3 (CENELEC) that included
s
nt on this subject many years ago, although
it was not widely circulated. I have attached it.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-08-23 09:16, Gert Gremmen wrote:
Hi John (et al),
I noticed with quite interest your
with
some explanation, if not evident.
I will create a list and re-publish for the use of all.
Thanks
Gert Gremmen
On 23-8-2019 9:40, John Woodgate wrote:
Two points:
* EN standards are not 'European Norms', which were/are a very old
set of standards to do with the Coal and Steel
into a better test set-up than CISPR32
(former 22), look into the CISPR 16 series,especially the chapters om
measurement volumes.
Gert Gremmen
On 9-8-2019 21:17, Andrew Perry wrote:
My friends,
I am preparing to drill new threaded holes in our chamber floor, where
we will perform our
remain safe.
It makes no sense seeking for our globes soil potential (ground) inside
a metallic volume.
Gert Gremmen
On 8-7-2019 20:19, 06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org wrote:
Hello group,
Is there a real ground in a ship? i.e if a Class I product is used on
the board of a
ean and have legal value, standards
do not.
A subtle variation of standards are /EU exclusive/, and they are *cited
harmonized standards*. Cited from citation in the Official Journal
L(egal) of the EU, Harmonized as being valid within all member states of
the EU. Cited HS have legal effect in th
.
If your product needs to be used for the EU-market in the years to come,
make sure you comply with all alternates.
Gert Gremmen
On 12-6-2019 6:55, frankt_cpmt wrote:
Thank you for sharing your experience Ted.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8, an AT 5G Evolution capable smartphone
burn away at 25 A and not at 100 uA.
It's your risk analysis, due diligence, and type of equipment that
decides for the applied current.
Gert Gremmen
and so the quality is ensured by those.
On 17-5-2019 21:08, Regan Arndt wrote:
Hello members,
I tried to search my EMC-PSTC archives
surely the LVD doesn't apply? It does, of course, apply to the power
supply that is supplied with it.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-04-10 17:51, Gert Gremmen / Ce-test wrote:
It depends..
If the power
that, that is why there
should not be any requirements.
Gert Gremmen
On 9-4-2019 11:36, John Woodgate wrote:
We are not so far apart. You say that the text should not have
appeared in a numbered clause that might be assumed to be normative. I
say that it would be better not to have a numbered clause
t/european-standards/harmonised-standards/accessibility-websites-and-mobile-applications_en
And a press release:
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6491_en.htm
Gert Gremmen
On 29-1-2019 19:36, Rudd, Adam wrote:
Thank you,
Do you have a specific L###? That an update was publi
May i suggest: XXX BC (British Compliance) , where XXX is the NoBo number
An example would be 250 BC. (confusion with Before Christ is really
unintended)
As a marking to replace the CE marking is suggest:
Afbeeldingsresultaat voor bowler hat clip art
The moustache is optional.
Gert
Note that publication/citation of harmonised standards in Europe from
now on (12/2018) will take place in the L section of the OJ, effectively
allowing them the status of EU -law. A first standard on Accessibility
of (governmental) Websites has already been published.
Gert Gremmen
be problematic for other
non-EU regions who look for compliance to standards on the OJ, and do
not understand the subtlety that in the EU that is not mandatory.
Michael.
*From:*Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
*Sent:* 27 November 2018 09:28
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re
or about 6 months.
Gert Gremmen
--
Independent Expert on CE marking
Harmonised Standards (HAS-) Consultant @ European Commission for RED and EMC
EMC Consultant
Electrical Safety Consultant
On 27-11-2018 9:43, McBurney, Ian wrote:
Hello David.
I would be interested in getting more information
This is clearly marked in column (5) of the list of harmonised standards
"Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded standard"
even if it is not listed in Column (2)
With the remark that EN 60950-1:2006 should not be applied for new
presumptions of conformit
and EN 55024 is ITE,
The scope of EN55032/EN55035 will be *multimedia equipment* and is
larger than ITE.
Gert Gremmen
HAS Consultant RED and EMC at European Commission.
On 26-5-2018 10:47, John Woodgate wrote:
EN 55024 has only a very limited future life. I would not recommend
applying
a higher of field problems.
Gert Gremmen
HAS Consultant RED and EMC at European Commission.
On 24-5-2018 7:01, itl-emc user group wrote:
An industrial printer has been tested to EN 55011: 2009 + A1: 2010 and
EN 61000-6-2: 2005 + AC: 2006 (latest EMCD OJ).
Another industrial printer has
are your possibilities. And yes, it applies for RED, as
a component in a radio (system).
Gert Gremmen
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> Op 27 apr. 2018 om 13:59 heeft Charlie Blackham
> <char...@sulisconsultants.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Amund
>
> Can you provide some
(by the absence of other cars for example, or by night).
Nevertheless, any speeding limit is enforced even if not troublesome.
But at the end, it is the manufacturer who decides if creating emissions
over the limit is acceptable or not. But do not complain if you get caught.
Gert Gremmen
was not the way to go.
Gert Gremmen
On 17-4-2018 1:22, Richard Nute wrote:
… how do you test *objectively* the adequacy of a symbol like the ! in
a triangle…
The ! is not a safeguard. Ultimately, the safeguard is some
prescribed behavior on the part of a person. The manufacturer
equipment or leakage/touch currents.
Gert Gremmen
On 14-4-2018 0:59, Leo Eisner wrote:
Nick,
This is an in process interpretation that is being currently developed
by IEC TC62 SC 62A WG14 and was supposed to be discussed today in our
London meeting but the submitter of the request for inte
that no standards for electrical safety have been published yet
does NOT help in good understanding the directives wording, of course.
Gert Gremmen
On 4-4-2018 17:44, John Woodgate wrote:
Yes, well, it's typical obscurantist wording. The LVD DOES apply, but
without its low-voltage limit
As LVD (2014/35) is not applicable for Radio devices and so RFID, this
standard is set up to be harmonized
under the RED. Be it as an Electrical Safety Standard under the RED.
Look at the provided link.
Gert Gremmen
On 4-4-2018 15:37, John Woodgate wrote:
SECOND RESPONSE
I should have
into view during the required risk analysis
as called out in the new LVD. For Europe only, of course.
The difference between functional and safety related EMC is an evolving
discussion, lately triggered by accidents with hybrid and autonomous
driving cars.
Gert Gremmen
On 20-3-2018 10:27
ual in automotive test set
ups, indeed says not much about the test level of the EUT.
Repeating this test under far field conditions, preferable on an antenna
calibration facility, might give you much better results. (not that you
are allowed to generate this much of power on air ;<)
Gert G
.
Gert Gremmen
ce-test qualified testing
((partially) retired in France)
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Monday 19 February 2018 10:46
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Insulation resistance test
The flash test is necessary because there are high-voltage
” , might also give some doubt to
as what directive actually is referred to: the LVD or the RED.
These directive are –as stipulated before in this thread- clearly not written
by a legal person…
Gert Gremmen
Van: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Verzonden
of it, including clause 7.
.
Gert Gremmen
Van: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 4 augustus 2017 13:00
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD
You have my sympathy regarding the problems with language, worth 0.001 Euro
>Yes, the building ground is likely to be noisy, unless you actually connect
directly >back to its earth spike
No signal, ground or supply is noisy. It is the designer that defines a
certain conductor to be clean, and references all other voltages (probably
to be filtered) to that potential.
>I am quite sure that BS 7671 and other Code standards do not recognize that
a >screened room is outside their scopes
Of course they won't. But it is, technically.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Wednesday 19 July 2017 09:31
To:
I agree that (national) legislation should play a role here,
but EMC chambers are NOT ordinary equipments, nor
part of a standard electrical installation.
I would not rely on electrical codes to create a safe work environment,
and have my personal opinions prevail.
We operate in a gray area,
As for the purpose of operation, EMC chambers need no grounding.
The shielding property happens by conduction of the shield material the
chamber is made from.
But as soon as mains filters are mounted on the wall, one has to cope with
leakage currents
(blind current) as large as 6 amp or more.
).
Gert Gremmen
From: Ken Wyatt [mailto:k...@emc-seminars.com]
Sent: Wednesday 28 June 2017 22:03
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] USB dongle connector shield filtered grounding
Bill, thanks for the complement. One of my mentors, Dr. Tom Van Doren, of the
University
roublesome for IT devices, as Class A of EN 55022 is still very popular .
As soon as a wireless BT WiFi device is added, EN 301 489-1 comes into view.
And since everything goes wireless...
Gert Gremmen
From: Paasche, Dieter [mailto:dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com]
Sent: Wednesday 28 June
sed to use 3 directives for Radio products
There are still missing red standards, notably those for (GPS) Receivers,
here a NB is needed, but as there is no standard
available, what will the NB have to impose ?
Gert Gremmen
Van: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com]
Verzon
plain PDF version. Single user
versions are a PITA for licensing rules and protection software.
Gert Gremmen
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Saturday 24 June 2017 16:12
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Questions on IEC Standards Adaption
In g
with the spectrum ?
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: T.Sato [mailto:vef00...@nifty.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 mei 2017 12:23
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] EN55032 host equipment...
On Mon, 8 May 2017 22:32:38 +,
Matthew Wilson <matthew.wil...@gbelectronics.
ls due to some Class A harmonics of the laptops local bus that were not
there before.....
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
.
That said and concluded: I am not fully sure what your device is up
to...
Gert Gremmen
Van: Silvia Diaz Monnier [mailto:silvi...@inti.gob.ar]
Verzonden: dinsdag 28 maart 2017 20:12
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: [PSES] Radiated RF electromagnetic fields immunity test
I did not read it on this list yet (unless a post missed by box again), but
last week a new version of the list of Harmonised standards has been published
(C76 10-3-2017) for the RED (2014/53/EC) 15 pages now of our beloved
literature
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
EMC, it includes
many other aspects such as heat, salt, vibration tests.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
of charge inside the card (where the user is
charged during card insertion) is enough to create substantial impulses in the
readers electronics..
For SD -cards (and other cards) similar effects can be expected.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approva
Many standards express the limits for magnetic field measurements in dBuV/m, so
in E-field. Most also indicate the relation of 51.5 dB to be added
to convert H-field into E-field , ignoring close field effects.
The 60 cm loop is an old beast, and so are test conventions.
Regards,
Ing. Gert
://img.conrad.de/medias/global/ce/3000_3999/3900/3930/3934/393416_BB_00_FB.EPS.jpg
Gert gremmen
Van: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 21 februari 2017 16:45
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] crimp hardware for multiple conductors?
I've had
eed replacement every 7 years, so
the risk that a detector does not detect what it is intended for is not
imaginary.
Maybe you US citizen can get Trump to write a presidential Order to stop CO ?
And the Europeans might create a CO-directive ?
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals mana
It depends. If it costs money probably they will refrain or at least be
reluctant and prefer
a warning in chinglish on page 97 note 21.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical
re...
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
+ Compliance Testing and Design for CE marking according to EC-directive
in the mandatory risk
analysis within the low voltage directive, in addition to blindly applying the
standards clauses.
Gert Gremmen
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen, BSc
g.grem...@cetest.nl
www.cetest.nl
Kiotoweg 363
3047 BG Rotterdam
T 31(0)104152426
F 31(0)104154953
Before printing
.
Make sure the ferrite comes with the right frequencies pre-polarized.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
---
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 11:05 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?
That is certainly right. But there is another aspect that might play a role
here.
Many fast dig
, there is
almost
no margin to comply, and any EUT design flaw problem will show as
non-compliance.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy
Exactly :
Once the signal is unbalanced (whatever the reason) only shielding can
attenuate the emissions.
But any unbalance is caused by the EUT at the sending or at the receiving
end, not by the cable.
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Brent DeWitt [mailto:bdew
, that cannot be cured
with a better cable; but needs a better equipment CM design. (Or a bunch of
heavy ferrites).
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
+ Compliance Testing and Design for CE marking according to EC-directives
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen, BSc
g.grem...@cetest.nl
www.cetest.nl
Kiotoweg 363
3047 BG Rotterdam
T 31(0)104152426
F 31(0)104154953
Before printing, think about the environment.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Verzonden: zaterdag 7 januari
to wait infinitely.
Unfortunately, any cyclic information is unknown if the test engineer is not
involved with the
operating principle of the EUT, so if following a black box testing approach,
the
measurement will never get to completion ! ;<)
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals mana
but to
the actual level instead as this obliges customers to buy Basic standards
(which are not for product approvals) and costs them more.
Tell us the test phenomenon (RI,EFT,SURGE or other) and I can help you find the
appropriate level.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
)
Of course measurements in this area make sense about the EMI-level at the
measurement point,
and that is why some standards make measurements in the close field at a
predefined distance.
Changing that distance will make measurements incomparable.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
do own such a device in the voltage DIP immunity setup,
mine has 4000VA output and can be digitally controlled.
(or use the amplifier of a Harmonics / Flicker set-up)
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
This phrase is a typical addition one finds in standards often
as the result of a compromise, where a generic test requirement
has been reduced to a subset.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce
al redaction quality process, checking for standards basics.
Although I must admit that I see no trace of any ISO or other quality
system on their site, where laboratories are supposed to comply
with ISO 17025
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremm
) should then refrain from dated references at
all or use some kind of index number to annex ZA when a standard is referred.
And it's a shame that CENELEC (as the latest responsible in the chain) is so
careless in their published texts.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
ommon
modifications, indicated by (mod), the relevant EN/HD
applies."
The latter phrase suggests that EN 55011:2016 is used instead of CISPR 11:2015
for which a DOP of 17-02-2017
is given as its status clearly references CISPR11:2015(mod)
This may give you a few months
Regards,
Ing. Ge
:
"For measurements at LV d.c. power ports of power electronic
equipment, a modern
implementation of the 150 Ω Delta-network specified in CISPR 16-1-2 has
been made available"
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approva
+1
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
+ Compliance Testing and Design for CE marking
according to EC-directives
For professional equipment
EN 55103-1 and -2 apply !
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
+ Compliance Testing
e voltages on the generator
(=amplifier) output that might couple in on the cable under test
There is probably not a real reason, but the decision was part of was thought
to be good craftsmanship.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approva
In IOT land the rock will warn the cars before it falls….. ;<)
Gert
Van: alfred1520list [mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: maandag 7 november 2016 20:39
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
On November 7, 2016 9:03:11 AM PST, Ted
not
actually get used, but empty over time.
Any recommendations for a reliable brand available
world wide ?
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent
,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy Services
+ Compliance Testing and Design for CE marking
according to EC-directives
harmonized….", as it is not the
standard that
could claim the harmonization property, but the OJ publication only.
The discussion if a standard is harmonized in any other way is not relevant.
Standards are by definition
a harmonisation (in the generic sense) instrument.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
A
We are all used to that odor, we work with standards right ?
They are "expired" before first print.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ I
-2 is written by Cenelec , not by the European
Commission. A smart way of circular reasoning.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/electronic equipment
+ Independent Consultancy S
) and are “common modified” to EN versions.
So CISPR11 (world wide) becomes EN 55011 (Europe harmonised) without
changing the “Industrial” definition.
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen, BSc
g.grem...@cetest.nl
www.cetest.nl
Kiotoweg 363
3047 BG Rotterdam
T 31(0)104152426
F 31(0)104154953
Before
May i try another coding ?
While testing<>end
call (nobeer)
call collegues(headache)
call nopromotion(this year)
end while
If testresult= pass then
call pub(beer)
else
fired(now)
end if
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals m
1 - 100 of 608 matches
Mail list logo
