Rob Brigham a écrit :
I think I am gonna wait before I go for this one. Only novelty value at
the moment for me, so I will see other experiences before risking
problems.
Also a pain is that you apparently cannot save direct to the CF - all
images have to go down the USB 1.1 connection which
It is very slow because it is NOT writing direct to the CF. It is sending the entire
file to the remote software on the PC which is then writing it back to the camera.
Which means twice as much data going through the slow USB 1.1 link.
As I said - they need a DIRECT to CF link.
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, I think I pushed the send button too quick, with a reply that copied
the previous digest.
Aaron Bransky
I pushed the reply button too late, for which I apologize.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Cotty,
It seems that only Lexar card readers have a problem with 10.3.3. I did
repair the disk permissions. I spent an hour on the phone with an apple
tech and he took me through a whole range of troubleshooting steps,
even to the extent of pressing a reset button on the motherboard. I'm
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1079600492.html
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
What Shel said about the magic moment.
That being said,i still like the photo.The contrast between the white windows and snow
with the darker
buildings is nice.Plus i like the reflection of the light house thinghy.
Dave
I don't know if this actually got sent
Yeah, I find it interesting that they use a Sigma body, but don't do it
in a Sigma mount. What about us Pentax users Kodak? We want full frame
too. Those greedy Canon people not have two options!
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 March 2004
On 18 Mar 2004 at 13:45, Rob Brigham wrote:
Yeah, I find it interesting that they use a Sigma body, but don't do it
in a Sigma mount. What about us Pentax users Kodak? We want full frame
too. Those greedy Canon people not have two options!
Maybe Cosina will feel sorry for us like the Leica
Perhaps they expect in two years from now to be in another price range
with a DSLR then $1350.
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 18:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall reading a post recently that said that Pentax expects its
DSLRs to outsell its film SLRs in two years.
Are Pentax's film
Sure they will. That's why they decided to make one in M42 mount!! How about
that? g
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Maybe Cosina will feel sorry for us like the Leica M crowd, LOL
_
Free yourself from those
I've been usin a Nikon LS4000 ED scanner for morethan a year nw and would definitely
recommend it. I started with a Nikon Coolscan II (good), upgraded to a Minolta Dual
Scan II (absolute rubbish), and then to the Nikon 4000 (the best). It's easy to use,
gives great scans, includes ICE which
Maybe this observation from last weeks darkroom class may be helpfull. One of the young
ladys,who
takes nicely composed pictures,has a problem with over flash and other lighting details
with her mf
camera.
She mentioned to the instructor that she felt if she bought a digital rebel or N70,put
it
Frank said, innocently, Who needs drums anyway?
Oh, I don't know knarf,
in my opinion are you ready for this
---they're hard to beat --- vvvbg
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Enabled at last
Who needs drums
I really like this one,Shel.
It really tells a story.Nice and sharp too.
Dave(not familiar with that film)Brooks
Taken during a time of political travail in San
Francisco
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/los-siete.html
William Robb wrote:
Lets see, to get an angle of view that is more or less the same as
the 15mm f/3.5 (the widest rectilinear that Pentax makes for 35mm),
they would need to make a 10mm lens.
I really have my doubts that this is feasable with the 45 or so mm
flange to focal plane distance that the
Have a look at Cotty's page on modifying the AF280T to allow the flash
to be used for fill-in:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/flashmod/flashmod.html
S
Lon Williamson wrote:
Not a dirty contact. First thing I checked.
Anyone tips on getting inside? I've opened up
a few flashes before,
Hi Nick In what way was the Minolta rubbish? Have
you scanned BW negs with either?
Nick Clark wrote:
I've been usin a Nikon LS4000 ED scanner for morethan a year nw and would definitely
recommend it. I started with a Nikon Coolscan II (good), upgraded to a Minolta
Dual Scan II
What will do the scratching of the body?
Certainly not a soft strap.
Certainly not the triangular keeper. Those have been used on cameras for
years and years...
I have a 1/2 wide soft woven fabric strap, made by Pentax, that was
attached to my KM when I bought it. No way anything there could
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham
Subject: RE: *ist D problem (firmware?)
It is very slow because it is NOT writing direct to the CF. It is
sending the entire file to the remote software on the PC which is
then writing it back to the camera. Which means twice as much data
going
frank theriault wrote:
Snip
I meant to ask you in my previous post, where exactly is this Saybrook
Point? Is the Borough of Fenwick in Mass, or am I way off base, here?
The Borough of Fenwick is part of Old Saybrook CT. There are three
things about it that make it interesting.
1.)
They're already making a Drangefinder :-) together with Epson using the
same sensor as the *ist D.
Then, they already make a M42-mount slr.
Maybe a M42-mount and a fully compatible K-mount DSLR by Cosina/Epson team
is not so further away...
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: Rob
Thanks. I went there, knowing about the mod, but found no
way to click to this.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Have a look at Cotty's page on modifying the AF280T to allow the flash
to be used for fill-in:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/flashmod/flashmod.html
I wrote:
They're already making a Drangefinder :-) together with Epson using the
same sensor as the *ist D.
Of course I mean Cosina, not Kodak.
Then, they already make a M42-mount slr.
Maybe a M42-mount and a fully compatible K-mount DSLR by Cosina/Epson team
is not so further away...
Response below
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Digital Imaging, File Formats, and Color
1) Which file format, in what type of compression, in what color space (or
photometric interpretation) is the best for archiving and printing (not web
use)?
Brent,
Jpeg is
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sigma have already made a full-frame 12-24mm zoom - a 10mm prime sounds
tricky but not impossible in my decidedly unexpert opinion :-)
Have you used it? Neither have I. Mostly, because I haven't seen a single review,
saying that it's any good at 12mm.
It appears you've broken through the shields...
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
I replied to a request about a BW developer saying that I used Rodinal for
everything -- giving a lot of examples -- and the message vanished enroute.
I sent it again and it disappeared a second time. If this gets there the
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Nick In what way was the Minolta rubbish? Have
you scanned BW negs with either?
I also used CoolScan 4000 for almost 2 years, and Minolta Scan Multi II
for a few months. I might have had a defective unit, but Minolta
Shel,
The two top brands for home users in my opinion are the Minolta Dimage
series and the Nikons.
I've owned both. They both have nice twain interfaces, and both have option
that includes interface cards.
You want something faster than USB 1.0, becuase a hi-res scan can produce
30+ megabyte
Is the flash problem with remote assistant operating camera?
Handheld, mine works with flash up. And I just tested it with flash up,
still works!
At 10:54 PM 3/18/2004 +1100, you wrote:
Just posted to dpreview, but decided someone here may be able to help too.
Nice, but it has the wrong mount. Again. Can't Kodak do it right, at least
once? grin
Alex Sarbu
---
Martisoare virtuale prin http://felicitari.acasa.ro
Hi Lon,
It is easy to take apart. Just watch out for the spring on the battery
door, it will go flying. Cotty's webpage shows details.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18,
For your project, you need a color test chart, or anything that can be used
as a true baseline, and have that in a picture at the begining of every
session or roll.
Then have one of those charts available for anyone wanting to produce an
image in the future and they'll make your red the red they
Just for you Frank, a few more lighthouse photos...
The first is from St. Simions island of the coast of Georgia USA
http://www.mindspring.com/~palling/photography/gallery4/Wall3.html
The second is a small Light of a style that's ubiquitous in the US from
the Florida Keys
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: Digital Imaging, File Formats, and Color
Response below
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Digital Imaging, File Formats, and Color
1) Which file format, in what type of compression, in what
- Original Message -
From: Mike Ignatiev
Subject: Re[2]: *ist-D and the wide angle lens dilmena
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sigma have already made a full-frame 12-24mm zoom - a 10mm prime
sounds
tricky but not impossible in my decidedly unexpert opinion :-)
Have you
Do you use a firewire or USB card reader?
DagT
På 18. mar. 2004 kl. 14.21 skrev Paul Stenquist:
Hi Cotty,
It seems that only Lexar card readers have a problem with 10.3.3. I
did repair the disk permissions. I spent an hour on the phone with an
apple tech and he took me through a whole range
OK, I think I got caught up in somebody else's thinking here, and didn't
translate it into my own real-world use.
For me, I don't care about sending images direct to PC as I am quite
happy to write to card download on a firewire reader or to my
flashtrax.
The only use for me of Remote Assistant
The TWAIN driver for the Minolta refused to work so I had to use the supplied program
to scan to TIFF rather than import into Photoshop directly. The Minolta used a carrier
for slides and negatives which it moved during the scan rather than moving the LED
array which the Nikon does. I found it
- Original Message -
From: Steve Jolly
Subject: Re: *ist-D and the wide angle lens dilmena
It was in the 21st Feb issue of Amateur Photographer (UK), so I'm
afraid there isn't a link to give you.
They printed MTF graphs for five different focal lengths. At 12mm,
the
resolution
I have once scanned BW with the nikon but not to very good effect. However the
negative was very thin as I'd used some old chemicals to process it, something I don't
do very often as I almost exclusively use Fuji Velvia or Sensia 200 slide film.
Best get the answer to this one from someone more
i scanned a few rolls of BW (some tmax100, some trix, some really old svema) on the
nikon --
apart from the fact that ice is not working with it, i couldn't see anything to
complain about.
just make sure you save and edit all in 16 bit mode, otherwise all you'll have is 256
shades of grey.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Ignatiev
Subject: Re[2]: OT: Almost ready to by a scanner
i scanned a few rolls of BW (some tmax100, some trix, some really
old svema) on the nikon --
apart from the fact that ice is not working with it, i couldn't see
anything to complain about.
just
I'm having a problem getting flash compensation to work properly. I read
that if I put the camera on M that I could use the exposure compensation
function to act as flash compensation. This works fine with the pop-up
flash, but when I try it with the 500ftz, it only works if I am adding
I was using the Lexar USB card reader that comes with their 1 gig cards. I'm
going to try my sandisk reader tonight. I think the problem is restricted to
Lexar.
Dag T wrote:
Do you use a firewire or USB card reader?
DagT
På 18. mar. 2004 kl. 14.21 skrev Paul Stenquist:
Hi Cotty,
It
Hi,
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 2:43:46 PM, Keith wrote:
What will do the scratching of the body?
Certainly not a soft strap.
Certainly not the triangular keeper. Those have been used on cameras for
years and years...
I have a 1/2 wide soft woven fabric strap, made by Pentax, that was
Hello Josh,
Could you provide a little more detail, such as in manual mode, what
is your shutter speed and aperture set to. And what do you mean by
looks the same? Once you subtract too much the ambient light takes
over. How bright is it outside where you are trying this?
--
Best regards,
Hi,
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 9:45:13 AM, Shel wrote:
I'm working on a long term project to scan years worth of
BW negatives and also plan to use the scanner for E6
transparencies, and, to a lesser extent, color neg. I also
intend to make larger than 8x10 prints and feel that the
largest
Traditional BW film. It should work with Chromogenic BW. But then
Bill doesn't
like Chromogenic BW.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mike Ignatiev
Subject: Re[2]: OT: Almost ready to by a scanner
i scanned a few rolls of BW (some tmax100, some trix, some really
Hi,
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 8:51:20 AM, Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
raw is *guaranteed* to be readable for as long as C complilers are
available, since dcraw.c is an easily available open source program.
just burn the source code together
OK, I have a Lexar Firewire card reader, but no Lexar cards. I´m not
sure if I should take the chance to upgrade from 10.3.2 yet...
DagT
På 18. mar. 2004 kl. 19.40 skrev Paul Stenquist:
I was using the Lexar USB card reader that comes with their 1 gig
cards. I'm
going to try my sandisk
We've had a lot of speculation, but here's what I would actually do. I
have no idea how typical I am.
I realize that I'm not as bothered by the APS sensor because I'm not an
ultrawide angle fan. I've used the 20-35 on my MZ-S but don't use it
that often on 20. OTOH, I have a Tokina 80-200 f2.8
Somebody said 15 years. I consider that a long time by today's
standards.
But seriously folks. The APS sensor is always going to be cheaper. It
will be the basis of the cameras that are in high volume price range
between $300-700. Once there are lenses out there at the wide end (and
the 14 is
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: OT: Almost ready to by a scanner
Traditional BW film. It should work with Chromogenic BW. But
then
Bill doesn't
like Chromogenic BW.
It works fine with chromogenics, which are, in reality, colour
negative film.
I actually
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins
Subject: Re: no fate but what we make
.
Once there are lenses out there at the wide end (and
the 14 is wide enough for most folks)
Most people want telephotos, not wide angles anyway. Thats why there
were so many zooms that go to 300mm or
I'm curious what the gigantic 80-210/4.5 SMC-T lens could do!
DJE
Same normal zoom behaviour...
I will check the 3.5 version tomorrow (K-mount, as long as the 4.5 but fat).
85-210mm to be exact.
Andre
I checked my 85-210mm f/3.5 and distorsion is noticably better
corrected than in the 4.5 lens
Hey, I caught the end of the Optio ad on ESPN. I guess it really does
sexist.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this has probably been discussed to death before, but
what's the reason to use chromogenic bw? if you take a color
negative film, and print on bw paper, wouldn't it give you the
same result? am i missing something very basic here?
best,
mishka
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling
You really should try XTOL. XTOL is the recommended developer for TMAX film,
not TMAX developer.
tv
What is the best way to agitate the film with XTOL? I've had
mitigated results with 3200 films (Kodak and Ilford) and I suspect
this combination might need more or less agitation than what I gave
Bruce,
I was testing this indoors. There was almost no ambient light (it was at
night with all of the lights off). I set the shutter speed to 1/125,
aperture was f/8. I did it like this b/c I just wanted to test the flash
exposure compensation. When I was in Manual mode and I used the
-Original Message-
From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You really should try XTOL. XTOL is the recommended
developer for TMAX
film, not TMAX developer.
tv
What is the best way to agitate the film with XTOL? I've had
mitigated results with 3200 films (Kodak and
Hi!
On my screen I see two odd patches of yellow/purple above the
buildings...
I have only one feeling about this image. It looks like it was shot
from a very well heated room, probably with fireplace, just before
commencing to listening to one' favorite music with shot of whisky in
hand. It is
I think the originally posted PAW is the best lighthouse shot so far.
It was a bit dark, but it conveyed a certain mood of bad weather brooding.
Even with the half frozen water in the foreground. And that's when a
lighthouse really shines, after all.
Uh. Pun half-intended, I guess.
All this talk
Hi!
Frank, I am late and I know it. Still, neither really works for me. I
am thinking about cropping the left roughly half from the b-w image.
But I realize your vision is different than mine... Also evidently, my
monitor would be re-calibrated real soon as it needs it.
ft You like better?
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
all you need is the file format syntax and semantics. Then you can use
whatever
programming language and operating system will be the flavour of the month
in 10 years time.
That's true. Let's hope that people like John Francis
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And as a symbol, nothing to shake a stick at although if you can snare
some comfortable stools, not bad per cushion.
Wearing your hi hat tonight, are you... grin
Jostein
hey, you can always send your files to india... or, wherever
all techies will be, at that time.
mishka
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's true. Let's hope that people like John Francis still hang around by
then...:-)
15 years was what I said, and it wasn't a very carefully calculated time
span. However, consider this.
It is inevitable that digital sensors will in time be able to output more
and more pixels. Therefore, if the APS sensor does get replaced in time,
it won't be by a larger sensor.
It is
Perhaps they do only need to introduce one, Vic -- but that's not where I
was
going with my comment. Mine was in response to the implication that Pentax
was moving more toward DSLRs and away from digital PS cameras.
To me, if a company is concentrating on SLRs and moving away from PS
I just found an interesting page which
provides
a map and the associated views
of our fair city from these points. It looks like a great idea for photogs
planning a city visit. Do you know of a similar page in your local?
No, but what a great idea.
C-41 Minilab 1hr capable!
At 10:45 PM 3/18/2004 +0300, you wrote:
this has probably been discussed to death before, but
what's the reason to use chromogenic bw? if you take a color
negative film, and print on bw paper, wouldn't it give you the
same result? am i missing something very basic here?
those are design issues, and size is one of the constraints.
mx and me-s are of the same size, but their design differs quite a bit,
so you are in effect saying: those small buttons on me-s are because the
camera is too small (*)! but those small buttons are only one possible
solution, as mx
You're right about measuring small quantities but I guess a small laboratory
scale would help there.
And a mask to protect you from the fine powder that gets in the air.
Andre
Hi All,
I'm having a bit of a problem with the trackball on my 1630. Has anybody
else had this. It dosn't move very smoothly across the screen and gets stuck
just below the needle position selection area. Blown Board, dirty ball???
Any help appreciated
Feroze
I think you need to clean your ball(s)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Mubeen Noorbhai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: [1630] trackball problems
Hi All,
I'm having a bit of a problem with the trackball on my 1630. Has
Josh,
I just tested with my own *istD and AF500FTZ, and from the camera display,
there were marked difference between no compensation and -2. I tried both
f/8 and f/16. Focal distance was about 2.5m and the lens I used was a Sigma
APO EX 70-200/2.8.
There is a chance that your flash or camera is
Hallo
that is a know buck if you are using the older TTL flashes (not for the
AF360)
But there is a work around. Only with ISO 400 the flash exposere is correct.
With 200 it is to dark.
So use 200 as -1 compensation. 400 is ok and if you want overexpose use +1,
+2
Or put in 200 and +1 than is
I wonder if this is Kodak shooting itself in the foot again? Hasn't the EOS
1-Ds consistently outperformed the Kodak dsc-14 in image quality and most
other categories? A Sigma body with a Canon mount, will consumers drop $5G
for it? I won't be surprised, however, if Canon drops the 1-Ds price a
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
On my screen I see two odd patches of yellow/purple above the
buildings...
I have only one feeling about this image. It looks like it was shot
from a very well heated room, probably with fireplace, just before
I wish, it was shot from a bridge on a causeway over
what kind of trackball? wired, wireless? optical?
i have a wireless optical from logitech, and that kind
of behavior usually means that my receiving base cannot get
the signal.
home this helps
mishka
-Original Message-
From: Mubeen Noorbhai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
The difference between the M cameras and the *ist D is that there are
vastly more buttons, screens, compartments, etc to cram into or onto the
*ist D.
Then there is the problem of holding a small camera properly. I once
owned a Minox (don't ask why!), and I certainly didn't think its size
This, I like, very much! Great shot. Wonderful mood.
Bruce
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 12:06:31 PM, you wrote:
J All this talk about lighthouses and recent interest in panorama shots made
J me look into my archives for one particular pano of a lighthouse. I
J upsampled it, and printed it out
-Original Message-
From: Butch Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wonder if this is Kodak shooting itself in the foot again?
Hasn't the EOS 1-Ds consistently outperformed the Kodak
dsc-14 in image quality and most other categories?
This is a new improved version of the
Stupidly wide exposure latitude.
Tiger Moses wrote:
C-41 Minilab 1hr capable!
At 10:45 PM 3/18/2004 +0300, you wrote:
this has probably been discussed to death before, but
what's the reason to use chromogenic bw? if you take a color
negative film, and print on bw paper, wouldn't it give you
I like your shot, good subject matter, nice composition, smooth
gradations of tone, much better
than mine in that respect, either you have a much better scanner or a
much better exposure, on
top of everything else.
Jostein wrote:
I think the originally posted PAW is the best lighthouse shot so
announcing more doesn't mean they are selling more. the market shelf life of
a PS digicam is a lot shorter than a DSLR. that's one incentive for
abandoning the digital PS market. in a commodity market, the one with the
highest production volume wins because their cost per unit is lower. 2 and 3
The opposite seems true too. When you print chromogenic negs on colour
paper the contrast is completely different to BW papers. I tried using
chromogenics because I could get it developed and proofed (6x4s) in any
minilab in an afternoon, but the contrast problem made the proof useless
and I ended
Hey all,
Just received my Slide Holder 1x . K from eBay . . . the seller has
more (or at least I saw another listed by him) . . . very nice purchase
. . . brand new in the box, it even had the plastic bag around it
still!
Anyhow, as I am looking through this I'm imagining there is a
- Original Message -
From: William M Kane
Subject: Slide Dup for *ist D
Hey all,
Just received my Slide Holder 1x . K from eBay . . . the seller
has
more (or at least I saw another listed by him) . . . very nice
purchase
. . . brand new in the box, it even had the plastic bag
so how do we submit if the gallery site is down? i don't have a link to the
submission form saved.
Herb...
XTOL isn't really the best push developer... Microphen or DD-X work better.
If I remember well I was using XTOL with a 1:2 or 1:3 dilution. I
guess I was looking for trouble...
Microphen is the next one I was to try. A friend of mine prepares
Microphen concentrates at home. I'll try it for
get a bellows then you have adjustable magnification.
jco
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original
Extension needed is very little. Any more than 12 mm and it racks out
of focus . . .
On Thursday, March 18, 2004, at 06:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
get a bellows then you have adjustable magnification.
jco
---
-
J.C.
Shooting from the hip. Uncropped
I couldn't get the scan to come anywhere close to the print, for some
reason.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2215439
As always, comments are encouraged and appreciated.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.
Hi, Boris,
I agree with you. Not about the cropping. Just about the pic not being
worth worrying about - not for now at least. I've moved on. May come back
to it later, but for now it's in the dead pic file. vbg
As far as worser, you likely know that's how many young children say
worse.
Geez. Where's tvv when you need him!
Tom - Tom? You out there?
vbg
-frank, joining this groan-a-thon
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
At 10:45 PM 3/18/2004 +0300, you wrote:
this has probably been discussed to death before, but
what's the reason to use chromogenic bw? if you take a color
negative film, and print on bw paper, wouldn't it give you the
same result? am i missing something very basic here?
best,
mishka
The masking
Hi Frank ...
Color, BW ... doesn't really change anything. It's no
betterer or worserer. You do have photos that are more
better though.
shel
frank theriault wrote:
Hi,
Some of you may recall that I posted this to mixed reviews (being charitable
g) several weeks or a month ago:
At 04:36 PM 3/18/2004, Herb Chong wrote:
so how do we submit if the gallery site is down? i don't have a link to the
submission form saved.
Try this: http://oksne.net/autopug/pugform.asp
Pat in SF
What do you call the guy who always hangs out with musicians?
The drummer.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
Great expression on the boy's face, and I like the angle. The way the
table emerges from the bottom of the frame really works for me. I don't
like the way the other guy's right hand is hidden. I'm not sure what
exactly is going on here, but the concealed hand is a bit disconcerting.
That
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
