I think what you are missing is a declaration of a global element in your
schema, so if you had something like
xsd:element name=datasource type=tns:datasource/
then you will be able to get a non-null response from
Property prop = scope.getXSDHelper().getGlobalProperty(NS_CODA,datasource,
StreamResult) {
save(xmlDocument,
((StreamResult)outputResult).getOutputStream(),
options);
} else {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
}
Thanks, Peter
kelvin goodson wrote:
I think what you are missing is a declaration of a global
Having looked for an example of the use of opposite properties, and not
finding one, I have just added a sample to the samples project (see
below). It needs some work to mould it into the shape of all the other
samples, but it does demonstrate how to make use of them.
Kelvin.
On
It looks good to me too. Given Amita's other note regarding being RM for
this release, I'll kick off a vote.
Kelvin.
On 29/02/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks good to me, ready to call a vote i think.
The only issue i noticed is that the sample-sdo module is in the
Regards,
Amita
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM, kelvin goodson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 22/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the review comments - working on those. I am just
checking
a
few things below where I am
Amita, thanks for this, here are some comments
Binary zip file on Windows
==
MD5 is fine
I couldn't find your public pgp signing key -- it needs adding to the KEYS
file at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
and registering on a key server (you may
/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita, thanks for this, here are some comments
Binary zip file on Windows
==
MD5 is fine
I couldn't find your public pgp signing key -- it needs adding to the KEYS
file at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator
, if the
targetnamespace defined in the schema is explicitly
passed as rootElementUri argument?
Regards, Daniel.
--- kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb:
So I think this is to do with the fact that you are
not specifying a target
namspace in the schema used to generate the classes.
I see from
Daniel,
yes, this looks like a concurrency issue to me. The null pointer
exception is occurring because the demand create metadata package doesn't
have a document root. Here's the EMF code that creates a demand created
package in EMF 2.2.3 ...
EPackage ePackage =
is accessed
concurrently?
Regards, Daniel.
--- kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb:
Daniel,
yes, this looks like a concurrency issue to me.
The null pointer
exception is occurring because the demand create
metadata package doesn't
have a document root. Here's the EMF code
I opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=218937
In the meantime if you can supply the data I requested earlier I think we
may be able to work around this.
Kelvin.
On 14/02/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel,
I'll check up on your last question, but I don't
to understand the
reason behind that and what is the correct action for this release.
Regards,
Amita
On Feb 4, 2008 10:41 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Amita,
thanks for the summary, and for working so late to kick this chat
off.
As we also discussed in the chat I fear our
Java open source WS stacks,
especially Axis2 and CXF.
- Ron
- Original Message
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Cc: tuscany-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 5:12:03 AM
Subject: [Cross Subproject Discussion
The chat will take as input the fruits of Amita's and my recent labours
documented at ...
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project
and give you a chance to adjust the priorities we placed on issues, and to
say where you can contribute to help make this a useful
see if by mistake I have missed any details?
Regards,
Amita
On Feb 6, 2008 5:07 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets confirm this at the suggested time.
Kelvin.
On 05/02/2008, Jeff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 9AM slot works for me, and I will try to attend
[I'm cross posting to tuscany-dev and tuscany-user again, to be sure all the
Tuscany community sees this. Please usereply rather than reply-all so
that we keep responses to the user list, to help make following the thread
easier and continue to reach the wider audience]
Some of you may be aware
As advertised a day or so ago, were having an IRC chat on SDO Java release
contents on Friday at 9AM PST, 5PM GMT.
In the meantime Amita and I are taking a first pass through open JIRAs, and
are over on IRC now. I guess we'll be there for a couple of hours, and the
fruits of our labours are
Lets confirm this at the suggested time.
Kelvin.
On 05/02/2008, Jeff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 9AM slot works for me, and I will try to attend.
jeff
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 17:45 +, kelvin goodson wrote:
This is a follow-up invitation for you to influence the current SDO Java
This is a follow-up invitation for you to influence the current SDO Java
release content that Amita is managing. We tried having an IRC slot in
Amita's working day (actually starting at 9:30PM her time; summary posted
at [1]), but didn't get participation, which may have been due to the
early
3:35 PM, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about having an IRC on 4th Feb ,Monday, 7.30 a.m. PST? Please feel
free to suggest another time if this is not
convenient.
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 29, 2008 4:55 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
18, 2008 5:14 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Amita,
Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these
categories. I only did the ones I marked up from memory. Ex:IFF files
must
me ignored, but it must be clear from the rat report submitted
way to ensure that the Ex:3rd do contain the
correct
license text?
Any old mail ref. or any other documentation?
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 18, 2008 5:14 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Amita,
Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these
categories. I
Hi Amita,
I blew away my entire repo and still got a clean build. However, it has
got me looking into what exactly the spec means when it says ...
getEncoding() returns the encoding of the document, or null if not
specified. The
default value is UTF-8. Specification of other values is
On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and
keeping
ref. to the
old mail thread -
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html.
I am starting a new thread now.
Web Site documentation:- I could
in it and give comments about what is
appropriate to fix there.
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and
keeping
ref
+Report
Please see Unresolved section in it and give comments about what is
appropriate to fix there.
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO
Here's how I did it for the last release
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC4/
See the rat_exceptions.txt file
Kelvin.
On 18/01/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Amita,
Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one
help.
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 15, 2008 6:42 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's high time we spun this release. There are various patches still to
apply I know, although I haven't done the ground work recently to
collate
all the info. Is there anyone out there who might
Hi Ron,
the SDO code never touches ConfigurationCache directly, and the EMF
JavaDoc says it is an internal API [1]. I guess this is one to raise with
EMF. A google on ConfigurationCache reveals very little in terms of anyone
having hit this issue before. Are you happy to raise this on the
Ron,
I talked to Ed Merks about this, and here's a summary of what he said.
He was referencing the EMF 2.4 code, but aside from the generics he thought
it was the same as 2.2.3. The key diagnostic would be to see whether calls
to getPrinter() and releasePrinter(XMLString) are made in pairs.
Hi Andrej,
Thanks for your notes. I think from your other thread you are sorted with
regards to this issue now. Is that right?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 31/12/2007, Andrej Koelewijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to create some test programs with sdo, and one of the tests is
that i
The SDO spec will be addressing standard instance properties that allow
values of facets to be retrieved from types and properties. Until that time
it allows implementations to define their own, adn we do that in Tuscany.
See
Looking at this again, I see I have answered it from the perspective of XSD
generation of types and you are using the dynamic API. You are free to
create open content properties of your own using
TypeHelper.defineOpenContentProperty and use them to annotate your types, so
that you can retrieve
Hi,
SDO Itself doesn't have a way to handle this at the moment, but
Tuscany has a method in the SDOHelper interface
public ObjectInputStream createObjectInputStream(InputStream
inputStream, HelperContext helperContext) throws IOException;
that allows you to associate a selected
Hello again,
thanks for your questions. With regards to your first question, I
think it's basically the same answer as I posted earlier today, that
you can create an ObjectInputStream associated with an arbitrary
HelperContext.
However, as an aside, I realised in my earlier response that I
this is (intentionally?) omitted.
Its a small step to some form of JavaBean PropertyChangeSupport.
Maybe anyone has a link to where this might have been discussed?
Thanks
Steffen
On 6/11/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steffen,
there's no provision
I'm looking through the mounting number of JIRAs in SDO Java and hope
to knock a few down. It would be good to get another release in plan.
What do people want in it? I'm going to be doing a full pass through
the open JIRAs in the near term and flag up my own priorities.
Regards, Kelvin.
Hi Ron,
Ron, sorry not to get to this earlier. I just took a look at this,
expecting to have to dig quite deep into an area I'm not very familiar
with, but debugging through a test case I spotted an anomaly [1]
which strikes a chord with your description. I'll commit a fix. Can
you let me
Please ignore the 2nd part of my previous note -- It was part of an
earlier composition that I meant to delete.
Kelvin.
On 09/10/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ron,
Ron, sorry not to get to this earlier. I just took a look at this,
expecting to have to dig quite deep
Umesh,
you have hit the known issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1021. The original
proposition was to implement copying of the ChangeSummary using
serialization/deserialization, but Frank's comment shows that
attempts to do this didn't work out. Is this a blocker for you;
Hi Frank,
thanks for drawing this to our attention, I was just looking back
at this. I followed the first link in your note and came to a generic
BoF page. Can you provide any more info on this please? Is there a
title for the BoF? Are you the BoF lead?
Tuscany Community --- Do we have
Hi Johan,
Having looked back at the minimal changes between 1.0 RC2 and the
final release I spotted that you said May 2007, which was the RC2 for
the beta1 release, so if it is these two distros you have been using
then there are a large number of changes between them, see [1]. I'm
not an
Eric,
the missing ModelPackageImpl issue is more than likely related to
old generated java classes that need to be regenerated. The XSD to
Java generator now just produces a Factory interface and
implementation per schema rather than the Factory and Package that it
used to produce.
I don't think I can see the reasons for this without seeing the
schemas. Here's a test case that passes for me ...
public void test2SchemasWithSameNamespace() throws Exception
{
HelperContext scope = SDOUtil.createHelperContext(true);
URL url =
You need to create a HelperContext that has the extensible namespaces
set to true. so instead of using XMLHelper.INSTANCE you must do
HelperContext scope = SDOUtil.createHelperContext(true);
then use the XSDHelper from
XSDHelper xsdHelper = scope.getXSDHelper()
if you use this instance of
Having released 1.0-incubating, what are the priorities for SDO Java now.
I'm just catching up on reading the lists having taken a break. The
major things I had in mind before going away were to
- rearrange the project structure to permit generation of java classes
during maven tests
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.0-incubating release
of the Java SDO project.
This project provides an implementation of the SDO 2.1 specification
[1] and this is our first release to provide full coverage of the
specification. In addition to completing the few remaining SDO
a quick update on my previous response, where I said any path resolves to
zero or one value only, I really meant that it resolves to zero or one
location in the data graph (that location may of course correspond to a
multi-valued property) .
Kelvin.
On 26/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL
The SDO 2.1 spec has left the way open for implementations to provide
alternative, scheme based means of handling path expressions in SDO calls
that operate on paths paths.
From the spec perspective, each path supplied to such a call belongs to a
scheme, the default scheme being sdo. To
/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras being
added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent fixe, so
we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of getting this
release out. Please help
the change summary aspects of the medical scenario sample
I'm going to tackle 3 now
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to number off the non jira related tasks so that its easy to
reference them
I just did 1 and now plan to do 4,5,7,8,9
1 the pom has
Oops, I copied 3 across unnecessarily-- it's done. I'm back looking at 12
now.
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11 seemed to be a no-op
13 is done
14 is done
leaving ...
2 use rat results to fix license header issues and post rat results
3 check that all recent
The class is in the sdo-api-r2.1-1.0-incubating-beta1.jar file. I just
re-downloaded the zip file from the website download page
C:\Dev\apache-
tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating-beta1-bin\tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubating-beta1\libjar
-tvf sdo-api-r2.1-1.0-incubating-beta1.jar
snip/
573 Wed Apr 25
You have a typo in your script, you have an extra .1 in the naming of the
SDO API jar.
Kelvin.
On 18/07/07, Sam Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to this, but am porting a preexisting code base that worked with
the M2 release, so have working code to go from.
Anyway, I've
either way with the naming; both scan OK to me.
9. Nice detail in the index file. :)
thanks
On 7/16/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond,
I'm going to reference your request in thread that is determining
release
contents. I added a comment to 1436. Will you be able
This release is running later than I had hoped due to extra jiras being
added to the plan, and a few issues that have come up after recent fixe, so
we are a bit behind where I'd proposed we should be in terms of getting this
release out. Please help with some of these TODOs if you can. If you
JIRAs fixed before the 1.0 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1436
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007
:
Kelvin,
I'm going to take a run at Tuscany-1143. I've started looking into
this issue and hope to have something by middle to end of next week.
Let me know if this will work for your timetable.
Thanks,
David
On 6/26/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to take a quick
You could download the source distro from
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC1/
or look in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/sdo-api/
Regards, Kelvin.
On 16/07/07, Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Where can I find the source
Robert,
I replied too fast without absorbing the precise detail of your request,
the true source of the beta1 is available at
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/beta1/RC1/api/
and the location of the beta1 source in svn is at
Thanks for looking at this ant ...
snip/
NOTICE file still contains the incubating disclaimer
will fix
RELEASE_NOTES should have a sentence or 2 at the top saying, in a nutshell,
what is SDO. maybe also rather than saying just '...is a superset of
previous release... make it sound a bit
I think you have hit the same problem as another user reported today. I
guess your root is embedded in a DataGraph, yes? If so then you have hit
the issue described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1421.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 04/07/07, litaojian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
There's a sample that shows the two approaches at [1]. This sample has
changed a lot since the beta1 release, so I include the output of the
sample below in case its not so easy for you to build from the trunk.
Kelvin
[1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelvin,
I think basic may read better than novice, but otherwise this is a
good idea.
Yours, Mike.
kelvin goodson wrote:
I just checked in another sample which I'd be happy to take feedback
on
--
[1] (output appended as in my previous posts)
I would like
Jeff,
welcome! this is great news. I look forward to understanding your
scenario and working together to ensure SDO does what you need.
Kelvin.
On 03/07/07, Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am currently architecting a SOA platform for a major Canadian financial
I just checked in another sample which I'd be happy to take feedback on --
[1] (output appended as in my previous posts)
I would like to rearrange the packages of the samples, as I think the
current arrangement is not very helpful to someone trying to explore SDO
(specCodeSnippets,
Hi Ron, thanks very much for these. I'm just exploring Erich's question on
Tuscany users list and then your patches are the next thing I plan to look
at.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 02/07/07, Ron Gavlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin Luciano,
I submitted patches for TUSCANY-1393 TUSCANY-1237
Hi Erich,
I generated code from your schema and tried the following lines of code,
which executed without failure ...
*public* *void* testErichsProblem() *throws* Exception {
PublicationDataGraph pdg =
ServicesFactory.*INSTANCE*.createPublicationDataGraph();
DataObject dob =
Release Candidates?
- Original Message
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 12:37:39 PM
Subject: Re: Patches for TUSCANY-1393 TUSCANY-123
Hi Ron, thanks very much for these. I'm just exploring Erich's question
on
Tuscany users list
The list is archived in about 3 places that I have found, but the one I
find best from a thread view perspective is ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/index.html
Regards, Kelvin.
On 02/07/07, Enric Staromiejski Torregrosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi,
I just got
Following recent discussions on the mailing list I have been updating the
SDO Java sample code and I'd like to solicit some input.
My aims have been
-- to make it an informative exercise to run binary samples without
necessarily directly referencing the source code
-- categorize the samples
Hi Tom,
the only generator we have in good shape to generate Tuscany SDO
classes is the XSD to Java generator. I think it would be a
significant new feature to properly support what you are trying to do.
You are correct in your understanding that you must arrange for a
specialised factory to
For anyone else trying to address this issue and coming across the
apparently unanswered thread, Thomas open two threads with the same
subject. See [1]
Kelvin.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/msg01128.html
On 18/06/07, Thomas Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
The JIRA http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1358 was raised
to help one of the community to understand how to load a schema, and
use the Types to generated a modified schema. I'm transferring the
discussion here to the users' list as I don't think this is a bug,
and the rest of the
Ron,
this sounds just the sort of thing I'd like to see beginning to happen,
and I'd like to be involved in doing it too. Currently I'm finding little
time to raise my head above the fundamentals of getting a spec compliant
release out there. But we should be looking outward and thinking about
:
i would like to see support for typesafe collections in the xsd2java
generator.
regards
Steffen
On 6/8/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again
please.
Thanks to David for responding with his requirements
else in my setup? I am
trying to get started on Tuscany SDO and would like to help with some JIRA
fixes, content...
Regards,
Amita
On 6/14/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/06/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I made a rather late attempt yesterday to use the regular IRC chat for the
purposes of discussing the SDO release content, which, no surprises, didn't
work out. Is there interest in scheduling a time slot particularly for this
purpose?
This would be an opportunity for SDO Java users and
.
regards
Steffen
On 6/8/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please.
Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix
for
1223. I have some thoughts that I'm structuring at the moment on what's
important
I've posted a couple of notes about the next SDO release recently. It would
seem timely to use part of the IRC chat slot to discuss this.
Regards, Kelvin.
Steffen,
there's no provision in the SDO API for receiving direct notification of
changes to values. It would be an unportable and fragile thing to do to rely
on the EMF underpinnings of the Tuscany SDO implementation. I don't think
there is anything to offer here from the pure SDO API level.
on 1223 a
bit later in the week.
Thanks,
David
On 5/21/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the beta1 release of SDO Java announced, I have begun thinking about
a
next release which I believe can be given the version tag 1.0-incubator
. We
have full coverage of the 2.1 SDO spec
Mail
Von: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Tuscany Users tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 30. Mai 2007, 18:23:05 Uhr
Betreff: [SDO Java] behaviour of generator with multiple namespaces
I'm applying a patch attached to [1] to the java generator which allows it
to generate
Chris,
we seem to have 3 places where prefixes are generated, and not using the
same algorithm.
1) BaseSDOXSDEcoreBuilder.getEPackage()
2) SDOXSDEcoreBuilder.lookupPrefix
3) EMFs BasicExtendedMetadata.computePrefix()
The difference in behaviour here is explained by the fact that when the two
I'm applying a patch attached to [1] to the java generator which allows it
to generate classes for multiple namespaces in a single run. The current fix
is adopting the safe policy of not changing the default behaviour, which
only exports classes for a single namespace.
So as it stands, one new
Hi Daniel,
could you open a new feature Jira for this please? I have created a
new version tag, SDO-Java-1.0. If you set the fix version to that then it's
clear that there is community interest in getting this into the next
release. You seem to have a good grasp of the code in this area;
Hi Chris
I couldn't find an example of this so I had a play and added a new test
case at [1].
Regards, Kelvin.
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/tools/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/test/OpenContentTestCase.java
On 23/05/07, Chris Mildebrandt [EMAIL
Daniel,
the short answer is yes it can. How? Well, the Java generator code
specifically for generating the classes that represent types can be seen in
[1], but note that it itself is generated from the javajet template at [2]
(a JSP like syntax).
To generate [1] from[2] you need to add a
David,
to be able to get a ChangeSummary from a DataObject it must either
a) be in a data graph that is contained in an instance of DataGraph
b) be of a Type which has a property of type sdo:ChangeSummaryType
c) be contained, either directly or indirectly by a DataObject which has a
property of
Hi Daniel,
these two libraries provide the stax support required by
org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.resource.XMLStreamSerializer
which underpins function in the Tuscany specific XMLStreamSerializer API to
allow DataObject's to be read from and written to XML streams. For
example, see
Ryan,
there are unsubscribe links from this page
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Mailing+Lists
Sorry to see you go.
Kelvin.
On 21/05/07, Ryan Auclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I don't know if this is the right email but I'd love to unsubscribe
from the apache mailing list.
On 09/05/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi SDO developers and users,
snip/
It would be great if
we can put together a first release of the CTS in June along with the 1.0
implementation.
+1 to that. Does anyone want to volunteer to be the release manager for the
CTS?
snip/
Switching this to tuscany-users to solicit user community input.
I think I need some clarification of what it means to ship the samples
with the binary distribution. One of the key things a user is going to
want to do is to modify and rebuild the samples, so how do we make
that easy for them?
With the beta1 release of SDO Java announced, I have begun thinking about a
next release which I believe can be given the version tag 1.0-incubator. We
have full coverage of the 2.1 SDO spec in the trunk now, and we currently
have 33 open JIRAs.
I've been working my way through some changes to the Java CTS that I posted
about yesterday, and have now created a new staging point for referencing
tests that people want to propose for adoption into the CTS proper.
16th May 2007:
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its
1.0-incubating-beta1 release
of SDO (Service Data Objects) Java.
You can download binary and source distributions from:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/
Maven artifacts for this
Bert,
I think the file at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/tools/src/test/resources/subgroup.xsddemonstrates
what you want.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 15/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've a general question concerning polymorphism and SDO.
Tuscany users,
there's been a some discussion on the SDO Java Community Test Suite over
on the tuscany-dev list. Things such as discussions about a release[1] and
working towards full coverage [2]. There has been a recent update to the
wiki page to show how to run the test suite in Eclipse
On the basis of my recent note, this would have been more appropriate on
the users list ...
-- Forwarded message --
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15-May-2007 13:21
Subject: [SDO Java CTS] adopting ContainmentTest
To: tuscany-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I propose
The change seems to have been introduced by commit 536241 as the first part
of a fix for TUSCANY-1197, which was a change to only the tuscany impl
project.
Kelvin.
On 14/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for trying this ant, looks like the issue we currently have is the
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
