On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The other option is to use the kde*meta ebuilds, which do directly
> > depend on the sub-ordinate packages. This is what I do and I don't
> > get the effect you obs
ng
> to 5.7.4.
>
> Thanks for your support.
I'm not sure how long that will take.
I've been running 5.7.4 without any obvious issues for a while now...
Attached is the "package.accept_keywords" file I use for 5.7.4
It's up to you to decide, but every time you l
On 24/06/2019 14:00, Mick wrote:
I've installed plasma-meta plus some kde-apps meta packages as follows:
kde-apps/kdeadmin-meta
kde-apps/kdecore-meta
kde-apps/kdegraphics-meta
kde-apps/kdemultimedia-meta
kde-apps/kdenetwork-meta
kde-apps/kdepim-meta
kde-apps/kdeutils-meta
kde
On Thursday 23 June 2011 13:09:53 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:49:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > My question was why are you installing cantor if you don't
> > > need it?
> >
> > Oh, I see. It was pulled in by kde-meta. I know I
-base/kate
kde-base/kcalc
kde-base/kcharselect
kde-base/kcheckpass
kde-base/kcminit
kde-base/kcontrol
kde-base/kcron
kde-base/kdeadmin-meta<--Yes
kde-base/kdeartwork-emoticons
kde-base/kdeartwork-iconthemes
kde-base/kdeartwork-kscreensaver
kde-base/kdeartwork-meta<--Yes
kde-base/kdeartwork-soun
On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:20:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> > kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> > for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
> > It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
> &g
On Monday, 24 June 2019 21:16:51 BST Dale wrote:
> I went through this a few years ago. I had some large programs
> installed that I didn't use, Kmail and others. I wanted to clean them
> out but at the time I had installed KDE with kde-meta. Basically, that
> installs every
On Thursday 26 November 2009 22:59:24 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:20:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> > > kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> > > for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
>
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OK, I have read back into January the suggestions on this
> list about going to Kde-meta 4.2. I have dozens of workstations
> running gentoo, so now I'm going to upgrade one (test) laptop
> to get a feel for kde-4.2 and
get this:
r...@smoker / # equery list -p kde-meta
[ Searching for package 'kde-meta' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ] kde-base/kde-meta-3.5.10 (3.5)
[I--] [ ~] kde-base/kde-meta-4.3.5 (4.3)
* Portage tree (/usr/portage)
[-P-] [ ] kde-base/kde-meta-4.3.3
m
> > out but at the time I had installed KDE with kde-meta.
Basically, that
> > installs everything KDE, wanted or not. I uninstalled that and
went
>
> > these instead:
> According to the current wiki page these days the kde-meta has been
replaced
> with plasma-m
like this:
ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.4.5 [4.5.1] USE="(-aqua) (-kdeprefix)"
0 kB
[uninstall ] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.5.1 USE="(-aqua) (-kdeprefix)"
[blocks b ] kde-base/kdeb
Hello,
OK, I have read back into January the suggestions on this
list about going to Kde-meta 4.2. I have dozens of workstations
running gentoo, so now I'm going to upgrade one (test) laptop
to get a feel for kde-4.2 and hopefully flesh out an
upgrade strategy for all of these laptop
message, thanks.
I'll answer my own question, including detail which may be useful to
other users:
emerge PyQt with USE=webkit sql
I had installed a few kde-meta packages rather than the full kde-meta.
eix -I kde | grep meta list your installed kde-meta packages
Add the kde4 versions of
e
> > devs seem to want to avoid that - there is a strict one-to-one mapping
> > between what the -meta packages install and what is shipped in the
> > upstream tarballs by KDE
>
> Sorry I'm being rather dense with this ... are you saying that the DEPENDs
> listed w
t; that causes the same app to appear in more than one -meta package and
> > > the devs seem to want to avoid that - there is a strict one-to-one
> > > mapping between what the -meta packages install and what is shipped in
> > > the upstream tarballs by KDE
> >
>
had installed KDE with kde-meta. Basically, that
> > installs everything KDE, wanted or not. I uninstalled that and went
>
> > these instead:
> According to the current wiki page these days the kde-meta has been replaced
> with plasma-meta. This is how I have configured plasm
pretend" gives a lot of output for KDE-components like this:
> ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.4.5 [4.5.1] USE="(-aqua)
> (-kdeprefix)" 0 kB
> [uninstall] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.5.1 USE="(-aqua) (-kdeprefix)"
> [blocks b ] kde-base/kdebase-meta:
-verbose --reinstall changed-use world
>> --pretend" gives a lot of output for KDE-components like this:
>> ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.4.5 [4.5.1] USE="(-aqua)
>> (-kdeprefix)" 0 kB
>> [uninstall] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.5.1 USE="(-aqua)
Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
> > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
> just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have many different
users asking for man
installed:
kde-base/kdemultimedia-meta
kde-base/kdemultimedia-kioslaves
If you're using a good chunk of kde, emerge kde-base/kde-meta. Makes
kde upgrades simpler, and less pollution in the world file.
To be honest, I don't want "meta" anything, bur from what I understand,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:28:42 + (UTC), James wrote:
> Is there an easy way to remove all of the kde packages before
> migration to kde-meta?
See the thread form a couple of hours ago, but one easy way is
emerge -Ca $(ls /var/db/pkg/kde-base)
> I like having as many kde apps ins
· Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Frida
David Corbin wrote:
On Sunday 31 July 2005 05:59 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:28:49 -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# emerge --pretend kde-meta
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[blocks B ] =kde
On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote:
> > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct
> > portage tool:
> >
> > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate
> > * Searching for kate ...
> > kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.1
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Finer grained kde*-meta packages (was: Make portage
assume, that a package is installed)':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I suggest that a
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:58:45PM -0400, Eduard Vaykher wrote:
> KDE should separate its releases by minor version. KDE 3.2 or 3.3 shouldn't
> interfere with KDE 3.4, which makes me wonder why and older version is
> blocking things. emerge kde-meta and see what kind of troubl
just not certain any more exactly which packages belong to
> which meta(kde) package. I think they are added and dropped
> over the last few years, resulting in a dynamic grouping
> or like those you mentioned, not being picked up by and of the
> kde-meta packages.
You fellows really need
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, james wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> > > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
> > >
> > > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
> >
> > just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
&
ersion :4.5 KDE, then emerge
> >>> the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like that.
> >>
> >> Probably there's no real problem but I think in my recent machines if
> >> I've chosen the KDE profile and try something like emerge
is removes everything in kde-base. It's equivalent to Neils suggestion.
> # cd /var/db/pkg && emerge -Cva kde-base/*
I then removed the monolithci packages by hand that are blocking
This is the command I used to see what is(was) blocking kde-meta:
emerge -uavDN kde-meta
> Also af
I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge
the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like that.
Probably there's no real problem but I think in my recent machines if
I've chosen the KDE profile and try something like emerge -Cp kde
nds -a kate
> > > * Searching for kate ...
> > > kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.1 (>=kde-base/kate-4.3.1:4.3[kdeprefix=])
> > > kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.3 (!kdeprefix ?
> > >
> > > >=kde-base/kate-4.3.3[-kdeprefix]) (kdeprefix ?
> > > >
> > &
igration
> form mono to meta..
Did you look at [1] too?
> Is there an easy way to remove all of the kde packages before
> migration to kde-meta?
Sure. But it would remove packages that the meta packages depend on too.
kde-base/kdelibs takes a long time to compile and hence shouldn&#x
Well, not Plasma's but mine for sure. I have been chasing my tail trying to
reverse engineer processes/services/applications I do not want auto-running on
a fresh Plasma installation and I'm fast losing the will to live.
I've installed plasma-meta plus some kde-apps meta pack
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I suggest that a cleaner method would be to not install kde-meta
> or kdenetwork-meta at all but instead just install the KDE applications
> that you require.
Actually, I disagree.
This would (obviously *g*) mean, that
.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde-expat-upgrading.xml
Maybe I should explain a bit more in detail how the OP should fix this,
as finding kde blockers between the -meta and monolithic ebuilds is not
a cut and dried process.
First, I assume he has read the emerging KDE howto on the gentoo docs
s
have to install these on their own?
> >
> > Hello Mick,
> >
> > I'm just not certain any more exactly which packages belong to
> > which meta(kde) package. I think they are added and dropped
> > over the last few years, resulting in a dynamic grouping
> > or
Hello,
I have looked at threads on this issue from 12jun06
and 2jun06
and http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xml.
By the way, this doc is good for explaining the issues,
but does not explain a clear method to perform the migration
form mono to meta..
Is there an easy way to
Wes Gray wrote:
># emerge -p kde-meta
>
>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
>Calculating dependencies ...done!
>[ebuild R ] kde-base/kde-meta-3.4.1
>
>I tried emerging kde-meta. I then tried unmerging all the blockers it
>created and then em
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade to kde 3.5.2
specifically because my current KDE was installed with emerge kde-meta
I have added the appropriate dependencies to
/etc/portage/package.keywords
kde-base/arts
~x86
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> Sets are a replacement for meta-packages, so your set would contain the
> packages you need. If it did contain kde-meta, then it would install all
> of KDE, because that is a dependency of kde-meta.
OK, color me "dense", but, if
On 10/5/05, Wes Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# emerge -p kde-metaThese are the packages that I would merge, in order:Calculating dependencies ...done![ebuild R ] kde-base/kde-meta-3.4.1I tried emerging kde-meta. I then tried unmerging all the blockers it
created and then emerging ba
ther fixes
>=media-sound/amarok-1.9
kde-base/kdepim-meta:4.1
# KDE deps
=kde-base/qimageblitz-0.0*
# KDE base libs
kde-base/kdelibs:4.1
kde-base/kdepimlibs:4.1
kde-base/libkcddb:4.1
kde-base/libkcompactdisc:4.1
kde-base/libkdcraw:4.1
kde-base/libkdeedu:4.1
kde-base/libkdepim:4.1
kde-base/libke
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Suppose you've got the following "use case": Install all of
> KDE, but leave out PPP stuff.
>
> How would you solve that?
I
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:03:10 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Lets say I have a set named dk-kde, with the prefix Allen suggested, and
> I put kde-meta in that file. Would that emerge all the KDE or just that
> one package? I emerged kde-meta to install KDE so that is all there is
> in my worl
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > Is there an easy way to remove all of the kde packages before
> > migration to kde-meta?
> See the thread form a couple of hours ago,
Awe, yes, Gmane runs very slow during the day (EST),
I see this recent discussion.
to kde4.6
> >
> > I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge
> > the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like that.
>
> Probably there's no real problem but I think in my recent machines if
> I've chosen the KDE pr
On Saturday 24 June 2006 18:05, James wrote:
> One of the KDE devs should put out a tool or script to completely
> nuke kde, then let folks run
> emerge -uavDN kde-meta' and be done with it. Disk space is cheap
> and I do not have time to 'hack' at kde across 7 w
;s request to make lines shorter and other response
formating issues.
I have gotten ride of all of the blocking, by unmerging everthing kde I could
find:
525 emerge --unmerge kde-base/kdegraphics
526 emerge --unmerge kde-base/kdemultimedia
> > Before or after the emerge -uavDN kde-meta?
e.
>
> I've installed plasma-meta plus some kde-apps meta packages as follows:
>
> kde-apps/kdeadmin-meta
> kde-apps/kdecore-meta
> kde-apps/kdegraphics-meta
> kde-apps/kdemultimedia-meta
> kde-apps/kdenetwork-meta
> kde-apps/kdepim-meta
> kde-apps/kdeutils-met
James wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. I get the feeling we're all hacking our own
install semantics here for kde-4.2.
I find the -meta packages very helpful. Instead of pulling in all of
KDE (with tons of stuff I don't need), I simply emerged those:
kde-base/ark
kde-base/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James wrote:
> kde-meta is ideal for me. I thought it was going away?
> Since kde(4)-meta is alive and well, that is my preferred
> method. I hope when kde-meta goes away (?) there is a migration
> plan? When this whole kde4 venture st
ning the issues,
> > but does not explain a clear method to perform the migration
> > form mono to meta..
>
> Did you look at [1] too?
>
Yes, That solves how to install a new kde (mono, meta, split) but
does not really address cleanzing the sytem of all the old kde kruft.
I
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:13:08 +0300, Cadaver wrote:
> I tried to update my gentoo instalation with 'emerge update world' ( i
> have kde-meta installed instead kde), but 'kolf' (probably it is some
> game from kdegames) failed to build. Then I remove kolf (I don
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm, I thought that kweather, kate and kfloppy were brought in by some
> meta or other. It seems that I'll have to install these on their own?
Hello Mick,
I'm just not certain any more exactly which packages belong to
which meta(kde) package. I t
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Dale wrote:
>
>> --depclean wanted to remove KDE 3. :-(
>>
>
> You don't have it in world?
>
>
>
I had kde-meta in there but not the specific version. I now have it in
the world file t
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:33:40 James wrote:
> Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > Sets are a replacement for meta-packages, so your set would contain the
> > packages you need. If it did contain kde-meta, then it would install all
> > of KDE, because that is
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The
Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 schrieb ext Alexander Skwar:
> This would (obviously *g*) mean, that kde-meta cannot be installed
> (just as you say). This means, that a whole "shit load" of packages
> would need to be manually installed. And all that, just because you
> don'
Willie Wong wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:24:02AM -0600, Penguin Lover Dale squawked:
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~net-libs/ortp-0.7.1".
(dependency required by "kde-base/kopete-3.5.10-r4" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kdenetwor
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
> The unfortunate thing about that it it doesn't appear to accept the
> 'meta-package' to cover everything and I'm still trying to work out
> all the packages that need to be added.
Ugh...
# grep --no-filename deprange
/usr/portage/kde-base/*-me
$ ls /usr/portage/kde-base/ | grep meta
kdeaccessibility-meta
kdeaddons-meta
kdeadmin-meta
kdeartwork-meta
kdebase-meta
kdebindings-meta
kdeedu-meta
kdegames-meta
kdegraphics-meta
kde-meta
kdemultimedia-meta
kdenetwork-meta
kdepim-meta
kdesdk-meta
kdetoys-meta
kdeutils-meta
kdewebdev-meta
On
g -pulseaudio" 381 KiB
> [uninstall ] kde-apps/kmix-4.14.3-r1:4/4.14::gentoo USE="alsa
> handbook (- aqua) -canberra -debug -pulseaudio"
> [blocks b ] kde-apps/kmix:4 ("kde-apps/kmix:4" is blocking kde-
> apps/kmix-15.12.3)
> [ebuild NS] kde-
delibs-4.2.0
It wasn't clear to me that this was the same problem, since that block
referenced a 3.5.10 package and mine referenced a 3.5.9 package.
However, upgrading to 3.5.10 raises another issue. For 3.5, I didn't install
the meta package, I installed the KDE base package:
ROOT
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> I mean, what's the advantage of the kde*-meta packages over the kde
> package, when the kde*-meta require just as much "junk", as the
> kde package does? Hm, really, what's the use of the kde*-meta package
> anyway
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 20:25:13 James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OK, I have read back into January the suggestions on this
> list about going to Kde-meta 4.2. I have dozens of workstations
> running gentoo, so now I'm going to upgrade one (test) laptop
> to get a feel fo
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
>
> Bringing kde-meta up to version 3.5.6 is going to want to upgrade ALL it's
> dependencies to 3.5.6 (which includes kate).
>
> To maintain different versions of of the various KDE packages, you'll need
> to
> remove the kde-m
On 02/06/06, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
$ ls /usr/portage/kde-base/ | grep meta
Thanks. Last question:
Is emerging kdebase-meta meant to pull in 45 packages, or are there
any old kde apps in my system pulling them in as I am trying to emerge
my new split KDE?
Fr
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yep. You get kde-meta or individual kde packages or you get your own
> ebuild that depends on a number of KDE packages. The Gentoo developers do
> quite a
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Make portage assume, that a package is installed':
> Good morning!
>
> On my system, I did not install net-dialup/ppp.
> But I'd now like to install kde-base/kde-meta, which w
required by "kde-apps/kmix-15.08.0::gentoo" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-apps/kdemultimedia-meta-15.08.0::gentoo"
[ebuild])
And that led into a long change of adding USE=qt5 to several packages,
followed by portage's decision to upgrade to KDE 5, which I've decided
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> I mean, what's the advantage of the kde*-meta packages over the kde
>> package, when the kde*-meta require just as much "junk", as the
>> kde package does? H
BRM wrote:
> I installed KDE yesterday via "emerge kde -vuD", and just remembered
> today about "kde-meta", which installs a lot more. In running "emerge
> kde-meta -vuD", I get 250 new packages, and 245 blocks, with 1 upgrade.
> What is the _best_ path fo
>kde-base/kbruch ~x86
>kde-base/kbstateapplet ~x86
>kde-base/kbugbuster ~x86
>kde-base/kcachegrind ~x86
>kde-base/kcalc ~x86
>kde-base/kcharselect ~x86
>kde-base/kcheckpass ~x86
>kde-base/kcminit ~x86
>kde-base/kcoloredit ~x86
>kde-base/kcontrol ~x86
>kde-base/kcron
On Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2008, BRM wrote:
> I installed KDE yesterday via "emerge kde -vuD", and just remembered
> today about "kde-meta", which installs a lot more. In running "emerge
> kde-meta -vuD", I get 250 new packages, and 245 blocks, with 1 upgrade.
&g
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:33:40 James wrote:
>
>> Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
>>
>>> Sets are a replacement for meta-packages, so your set would contain the
>>> packages you need. If it did contain kde-met
On Saturday 24 June 2006 19:21, James wrote:
> Are these simple steps going to work?
> If not please edit. I do not care about
> extra compile time. I need a simple straightforward method
> to nuke(&&unistall all of KDE) and install via kde-meta
>
> First:#
>
> c
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:41:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> emerge -C kde
> >> emerge --depclean -a
> >> emerge -av kde-meta
> >>
> >
> > That's what I was afraid of. Sigh. Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Could he just
On Thursday 01 March 2007 18:06:47 Turi Tropea wrote:
> hi everyone,
> after a fresh installation of gentoo (using the minimal cd)
> i try to emerge kde-meta kde-i18n kdm
> but an error was occured, 41 package blocks the emerge
> there is the output of the emerge --pretend and packa
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 18:01, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2007 19:34:49 Mat Harris wrote:
> > It appears I may have more of a problem than I thought. By the way I
> > installed kdebase-meta I believe (as the kde howto suggested) but now
> > when tryin
lso have to remove wallpapers in order to make portage
happy about conflicts:
[/etc/portage/package.use]
kde-base/kdebase-startkde -wallpapers
kde-apps/kdebase-meta -wallpapers
(Yes, it took forever to do that manually.)
I suspect it will probably not work now but it'll be a starting point
e tree
though, like kmplayer, kaffeine, ktorrent, etc.
> You could reduce that sill further
> by using more than the two meta packages I currently have.
Again, since I prefer to just install the apps I want, I only pulled in 1 meta
package.
$ grep ^kde /var/db/pkg/world | grep -e '
2009/11/26 James :
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> grep kde /var/lib/portage/world
>
> only kde-meta in there
>
>>emerge -a --depclean
>
>
> yep, just making sure as I thought there might be a
> very special syntax to remove all kde 3.5.
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:31:26 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm confused here. (even more..)
>
> Before starting the compile:
> I ran a comparision of `emerge -v -p kde' and
> emerge -v -p kde-meta
>
> The last showed a much larger pile of dependancies than the
Bo Ørsted Andresen zlin.dk> writes:
The revdep-rebuild is good *after* emerging kde-meta. It will recompile third
party applications such as amarok against the new version of kde-meta. I
posted the simple steps at the bottom of my previous mail.
Assuming you really
do want to nuke
t; !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> > request:
> > - kde-base/kate-3.5.6 (masked by: package.mask)
> >
> > For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
> > page or
> > refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> >
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:03:10 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Lets say I have a set named dk-kde, with the prefix Allen suggested, and
>> I put kde-meta in that file. Would that emerge all the KDE or just that
>> one package? I emerged kde-meta to
Ian K schreef:
> I didn't know about this kde-meta package..
> Will it get me 3.4.1?
> Ian
>
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=kde-meta
kde-meta
Description: kde - merge this to pull in all kde packages
Releasesalpha amd64 arm hppaia64mips
On Saturday 16 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about '[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> · Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Right, because kde*-meta is supposed to replace, and act as much as
>
e the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0
#
# ls -ld /var/db/pkg/kde-base/kde*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 912 Sep 28 14:24 /var/db/pkg/kde-base/kde-env-3-r4
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 912 Sep 26 21:56 /var/db/pkg/kde-base/k
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:13:05 +0200
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a command which shows all dependencies of a package?
>
> Unfortunately, qdepends doesn't do the job, e.g.
>
> qdepends kde-base/kde-meta shows no dependencies at all while there
> are mor
and educational packages.
Install kdebase-meta, kdenetwork-meta, kdepim-meta etc. kde-meta is for
those that want to install everything.
Thanks for all the replies. What's the best way to find out what
-meta packages exist and what they contain?
--
Regards,
Mick
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> >
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> >
> >
> >
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5"
> > have been masked.
> >
> > !!! O
.
>
> [ebuild N ] kde-plasma/plasma-meta-5.5.5:5::gentoo
> USE="display-manager gtk pam pulseaudio sddm sdk wallpapers -bluetooth
> -mediacenter -networkmanager" 0 KiB
> [ebuild NS] kde-apps/kde-meta-15.08.3:5::gentoo
> [4.14.3-r1:4::gentoo] 0 KiB
> [u
ote:
> > > Apologies if this has been asked before. I uninstalled my monolithic
> > > KDE and am ready to install the split KDE ebuilds. I want to install
> > > everything except toys, games and educational packages.
> >
> > Install kdebase-meta, kdenetwork-me
I've just completed an upgrade to kde-meta-3.5 from kde-meta-3.4 -- what's
the beast way to clean up all the old kde 3.4 packages.
emerge -C kde-meta; emerge --depclean
doesn't work: depclean does not show any of the kde 3.4 packages as
candidates for removal.
--
Boyd Stephen S
gt; wrote:
> > $ ls /usr/portage/kde-base/ | grep meta
>
> Thanks. Last question:
>
> Is emerging kdebase-meta meant to pull in 45 packages, or are there
> any old kde apps in my system pulling them in as I am trying to emerge
> my new split KDE?
>
> From the log:
&
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > Where do I read about what all is in xorg-x11 versus xorg-server(which
> > is all that kde-meta needs?)? What exactly does kde-meta needs and
> > such....
> emerge kde-meta -pv should show you all that KDE needs.
Yep, that is
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 16:50:10 Dale wrote:
If you use KDE like me, be prepared to put the thing back tho. Some KDE
packages depend on things that seem to need it enabled.
Looks like it's only packages that are pulled in by kdeedu-meta. Do you nee
1 - 100 of 1429 matches
Mail list logo
