The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 1 : Issue 31 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: Lug Bolt Torque
  Re: Part number check
  Re: Where did all the traffic go?
  Re: Where did all the traffic go?
  Re: Where did all the traffic go?
  Re: Where did all the traffic go?
  ADMIN: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
  Re: CARFAX-SLAM/Book  values
  Re: CARFAX-SLAM
  Re: Lug Nut Torque
  Re: Lug Nut Torque
  Castro Valley CA shop?
  Re: Where did all the traffic go?
  Valve adjustment and engine compression?
  Re: San Diego

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 01:34:06 -0700
From: "Bob Sutterfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lug Bolt Torque
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Keywords: BMW

I use my cordless impact wrench at part-throttle to spin the bolts in
while mounting the wheels, then my torque wrench to tighten the bolts to
spec.

I have experienced Discount Tire grossly overtorquing my bolts and
grossly underinflating my tire.  Now I have the service writer put "hand
tool install only" on my ticket.  And I still hover outside the bay to
keep an eye on the guy doing the work, because I've had them start to
ignore the note.
--
Bob Sutterfield
'87 E30 325iS http://bmwe30.net #1129 DAS KAR
'88 E28 535iS http://m535i.org   #154 IHR FUNF
'93 T4 EV MV Weekender BELUGA
BMWCCA #169277 Rocky Mountain Chapter



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:50:26 -0500 (EST)
From: "Steve.Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Part number check
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Chet Dawes suggested that the correct front rotor for my
1999 E36 323is was

   34 11 1 165 455

so I called up a different dealer from the one who sold
me the rotors to check.  It turns out 165 455 is the old
number, which has been superceded by

    34 11 1 164 431

Interesting that the "newer" number is lower than the
"older" one; the minds of Bavarian engineers must work
in strange ways.

If anyone else cares...

Steve

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:57:02 -0500
From: UUC Digest Monitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The Digest goes through cycles.

It's pretty normal behavior for this list. There are times it's insanely 
busy and times that it gets a little slow.

We just changed list software as well, and changes like that always throw 
people off a bit.

At 09:45 PM 11/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I recently resubscribed to this list after a six or more month 
>absence.  There used to be two or three digests a day; now there's much, 
>much less.
>
>Where did all the message traffic go?
>
>--tabe johnson
>Vancouver BC
>1988 325is

Michael K Donohue
System Administrator
UUC Digest
http://www.uucdigest.com



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:26:52 -0600
From: "Scott Staewen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Definitely a big drop in volume following the promotion of Majordomo. Is 
this coincidental?
rss

>I recently resubscribed to this list after a six or more month absence. 
>There used to be two or three digests a day; now there's much, much less.
>
>Where did all the message traffic go?
>
>--tabe johnson Vancouver BC 1988 325is
>

_________________________________________________________________
Is there a gadget-lover on your gift list?  MSN Shopping has lined up some 
good bets!  http://shopping.msn.com


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:54:07 -0600 (CST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Definitely a big drop in volume following the promotion of Majordomo. Is
> this coincidental?

I do believe it is partly due to replies going back to the original poster
rather than the list by default. Or perhaps that's how I have my options
set.

...steven

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:05:36 -0500
From: "Bill Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

That got me on a recent post. And by the time I figured out it had happened
the info was stale enough that I didn't feel like reposting to the list.

Bill Matthews
Hockessin DE
00 M Geeze
some Volvos
other cars

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: Where did all the traffic go?


> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > Search the
ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Definitely a big drop in volume following the promotion of Majordomo. Is
> > this coincidental?
>
> I do believe it is partly due to replies going back to the original poster
> rather than the list by default. Or perhaps that's how I have my options
> set.
>
> ...steven
com


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:47:04 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADMIN: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The current list config is set to default to reply to the sender as
opposed to the list.

This is likely part of it, you aren't seeing the "chatter" that you saw
before.

Speaking of which, let's take this thread off-list. The non-BMW content is
likely boring those who could care less about list nonsense.

> Definitely a big drop in volume following the promotion of Majordomo. Is
> this coincidental?
> rss

Regards,
Your BMWUUCDIGEST Monitors

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:59:59 -0500
From: "Eurowerks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CARFAX-SLAM/Book  values
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Chris,

I am glad that you came forward with this.  I have people come in all of the
time and tell me that their car is perfect according to CARFAX only to find
out that the whole car has been painted and it is actually two different
cars welded back together and painted VERY well to cover up the mishap.
For the more knowledgeable of us out here, if you have a serious collision
and don't want to have it show up on your car's history report, just pay for
the damages out of your pocket and never make a claim with your insurance
company and "voila", you now have a clean and straight title with a car that
has been creamed!
I see this all of the time.  It is just unfortunate that the general
population believes WAY too much in the marketers of this (CARFAX) type of
product.
And while we are at it, what about BOOK values.  Come on people, a car is
only worth what someone is willing to cut a check for, not what some book
says it should be worth.  Next time you want book value for an older car,
see if you can get the book to cut you a check!!!

Kirk A. Gilchrist
EURO-WERKS / Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Volvo Service and Repair
8 South Highland St. / Winchester, KY 40391 / 859-745-0125
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 888-522-0271 toll free



------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:46:20 -0500
From: Phil Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Chris Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CARFAX-SLAM
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Chris Marino wrote:
>In a rare departure from civility, I would have to state that 'carfax
>sucks'.
>
>I could continue this vitriolic diatribe for hours.  What I can say about
>Carfax is that, in no way, should anyone depend upon them 100%.  They are,
>at best, a weak reference or indicator of a cars' potential history.

I knew you all would come around. Not to say I told you so, but:

At 12:23 AM -0400 7/24/03, Phil Marx wrote:
>Sorry, I think Carfax is a bunch of bunk that has been built up as 
>some dealer tool and now is being used against the consumer. IMHO.

The information they need to do what they say they do just isn't 
available to them and much of the information they do use just isn't 
accurate.

Shit in, shit out.

An apparently successful business model built on the early Internet 
schemes of selling vapor.

-Phil

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 06:57:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Neil Deshpande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lug Nut Torque
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Brett:

This is exactly how the Roush guys did it for all
development testing (noise testing requires tires with
a certain tread and we shaved them to spec to get the
quietest possible ride).  If I had air tools, I'd use
them to spin on the bolts (nuts on the 944) as well.

I'm surprised you don't torque by feel, feeling for
bolt stretch, as Gary Derian does.  I do this all the
time now and find 100% consistent feel when removing
the bolts.  I really like this method.  Thanks to my
friend John Aho who gave me a thread chaser as a going
away present when I left Detroit, I also chase and
keep all my threads clean so the torque method would
be accurate enough, but I like the engineering aspect
of the feel for stretch method.

Neil Deshpande

***

"KMS - Brett Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While it wouldn't surprise me one bit if the above is
accurate.  One might note that some techs use the
impact to spin the lugs in WITHOUT tightening them
down, then torque with a torque wrench.

I do this on a regular basis.  It's a pain to screw in
5 lugs by hand when you have an air tool beside you
that can do it quickly.  Any decent impact gun will
allow partial throttle, so that even at the strongest
torque setting, you're getting no where near where you
need to be as far as final torque goes.  My IR2131 is
old, but still allows this control.  With the torque
wrench set at 85ft lb., I usually get at least 1/4
turn of the bolt before the click.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:29:46 -0500
From: "John Weese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lug Nut Torque
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Brett Anderson writes:

<<....  One might note that some techs use the impact to spin the lugs in
WITHOUT tightening them down, then torque with a torque wrench.

I do this on a regular basis.  It's a pain to screw in 5 lugs by hand when
you have an air tool beside you that can do it quickly.  Any decent impact
gun will allow partial throttle, so that even at the strongest torque
setting, you're getting no where near where you need to be as far as final
torque goes.  My IR2131 is old, but still allows this control.  With the
torque wrench set at 85ft lb., I usually get at least 1/4 turn of the bolt
before the click.>>


EXACTLY, and if I was a full time mechanic I'd probably do the same thing.
The one place that I will take my cars and let them mount tires on my alloy
wheels, etc. is a dumpy tire place in town, BUT they have a top notch Hunter
tire machine, AND  ...the first time I took a car there they used the impact
wrench to merely spin the lugs on and then used a torque wrench to "my
preferred setting".....I've been going back there ever since.

Most of us don't use an impact wrench because we aren't setup in our garages
for "volume work & efficiency".  I used to "cringe" at the thought of anyone
using an impact wrench on my wheels, but as long as the work is done like
Brett describes, I have no problem with it....trust in your mechanic means
much to me also!  I'd "NEVER" go to Costco, Pep Boys, or any place like that
with "any" of my cars....the day that happens, you might as well bury me :-)

John Weese
BMW CCA #76646
_________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau (my '02 buddy) - friend, enthusiast, founder of
the BMW CCA.




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:22:26 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Castro Valley CA shop?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Dear listers and lurkers:

Anyone know of a trusted shop/tech in Castro Valley, CA area to perform a 
pre-purchase inspection for me?  The fleet is expanding, this time with an '88 
super eta 528e.

Thanks in advance.  Love the new digest.
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:22:15 -0800 (PST)
From: John Bolhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where did all the traffic go?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, tabe johnson wrote:

> I recently resubscribed to this list after
> a six or more month absence.  There used to
> be two or three digests a day; now there's
> much, much less.
>
> Where did all the message traffic go?

 Whoa, you missed all the good stuff!  There have been rapid
developments, and it turns out the supercharger that runs on
electricity functions really, really well now!  We're all having so
much fun driving our cars that we don't have time for much email.

;-)

--
 "It is an honor to be Cookie Monster."
   -Sesame Street spokeswoman Audrey Shapiro


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:36:56 -0800
From: Olivia Teich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Valve adjustment and engine compression?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Yesterday I was informed that compression in three of my six cylinders 
is a little low.  The readings were: 150 140 150 120 110 150, though I 
may have the order slightly wrong.  This was done at a shop I had never 
been to before (and I wasn't exactly thrilled at an hour and a half 
inspection taking over three hours).

First, is this something to be concerned about and/or something that 
should actually be fixed now?  I have been getting mixed and very 
ambiguous responses from my mechanic and the one who did the test on 
what this means and how it bodes for the long-term performance of the 
engine.  There is no noticeable loss of pickup and the car drives very 
well, as even the guy who did the test agreed.  The buyer was in love 
with the car (she tore the For Sale sign out of the window when someone 
asked about the car in the middle of our test drive), but she is very 
wary of this particular issue on a car she plans to keep for a long 
time.

Second, is the valve adjustment I had done 4 months/3K miles ago in any 
way related to the compression numbers, and if so, should I get 
readings like this with such a recent valve adjustment?  (After a few 
questionable experiences recently, including a one year old oil pan 
gasket that has been leaking again, the motor in my convertible top 
breaking the first time I used it after they had gotten it stuck while 
trying to operate it with the frame flexed on the lift, etc., I am 
beginning to wonder about my trusted shop which came so highly 
recommended...)

I am taking the car in this afternoon to have the oil pan gasket fixed. 
  Any advice on what I can or should do about the compression readings 
while it's there?

Thanks in advance for any advice!

Beleaguered in California,
Olivia
325ic <- for sale


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:49:26 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: San Diego
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Kathy,

I don't remember the name of the place but it if you take the launch from
the Marriot to the mainland side, cross the metro tracks at the station
side and bear right there is a breakfast place at a building corner that is
great. If you're into breakfast. I think the name is also the address of
the place.
What kind of things do you guys like to do?

-Kevin


------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(15 messages)
**********

Reply via email to