dev  

Messages by Thread

• [SOLVED] Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Kapil Panchal
• Apache Fineract docker tags Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Arnold Galovics
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Arnold Galovics
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags James Dailey
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Arnold Galovics
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags James Dailey
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Adam Monsen
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags Arnold Galovics
  • Re: Apache Fineract docker tags James Dailey
• Removing our VM hosted by ASF Infra James Dailey
  • Re: Removing our VM hosted by ASF Infra Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Removing our VM hosted by ASF Infra Adam Monsen
  • Re: Removing our VM hosted by ASF Infra Aleksandar Vidakovic
  • Re: Removing our VM hosted by ASF Infra VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: Removing our VM hosted by ASF Infra James Dailey
• Apache Trusted Release process - Automated Release process James Dailey
  • Re: Apache Trusted Release process - Automated Release process Adam Monsen
• Requirement for the Software and Implementation Partner Alvita Pinto
• Re: fineract - Neobank project Arsenio F J
  • Re: fineract - Neobank project Ádám Sághy
  • Re: fineract - Neobank project James Dailey
• Fineract Survey Results 2025 James Dailey
  • Re: Fineract Survey Results 2025 Kigred Developer
• New Apache logo & Community Over Code James Dailey
  • Re: New Apache logo & Community Over Code Adam Monsen
  • Re: New Apache logo & Community Over Code Terence Monteiro
  • Re: New Apache logo & Community Over Code Yu Wati Nyi
  • Re: New Apache logo & Community Over Code Ádám Sághy
• Tweaking the "Execute standing instructions" handle batches instead of the whole lump-some of instructions Kigred Developer
  • Re: Tweaking the "Execute standing instructions" handle batches instead of the whole lump-some of instructions Bharath Gowda
  • Re: Tweaking the "Execute standing instructions" handle batches instead of the whole lump-some of instructions Kigred Developer
  • Re: Tweaking the "Execute standing instructions" handle batches instead of the whole lump-some of instructions VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: Tweaking the "Execute standing instructions" handle batches instead of the whole lump-some of instructions Paul
• running tests locally, local integration test failures, db disk usage Adam Monsen
  • Re: running tests locally, local integration test failures, db disk usage Adam Monsen
• Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Adam Monsen
  • Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Adam Monsen
  • Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix Kapil Panchal
  • Mission of Fineract - part 2 (Re: Development Builds Failing - Urgent Fix) James Dailey
• Docker images for fineract James Dailey
  • Re: Docker images for fineract VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
• PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Ádám Sághy
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Paul
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys James Dailey
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Paul
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Ádám Sághy
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Paul
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Arnold Galovics
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Paul
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Arnold Galovics
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Jose Alberto Hernandez
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Tom Daly
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys James Dailey
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Aleksandar Vidakovic
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Terence Monteiro
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Adam Monsen
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Paul
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Ádám Sághy
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Tom Daly
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Kapil Panchal
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Mihaly Dallos
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Adam Monsen
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Moving away from DB-enforced auto-increment primary keys Terence Monteiro
• Introduction – Elroy Elroy Samuel
  • Re: Introduction – Elroy Ed Cable
  • Re: Introduction – Elroy Paul
• Security Orientation James Dailey
• Glad to join the Fineract community Gerard Antony
• Open For contributions Aman Mittal
  • Re: Open For contributions Rajan Maurya
• local integration test failures - MockitoException - static mocking is already registered in the current thread Adam Monsen
  • Re: local integration test failures - MockitoException - static mocking is already registered in the current thread Paul
  • Re: local integration test failures - MockitoException - static mocking is already registered in the current thread Adam Monsen
• FINERACT SURVEY - Please respond James Dailey
  • Re: FINERACT SURVEY - Please respond James Dailey
  • Re: FINERACT SURVEY - Please respond James Dailey
  • Re: FINERACT SURVEY - Please respond Mihaly Dallos
  • Re: FINERACT SURVEY - Please respond James Dailey
• Introduction - Shivam Shivam
• Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor) Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor) Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor) Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor) James Dailey
  • Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor) Paul
  • Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor) Kapil Panchal
  • Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Ed Cable
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] James Dailey
  • RE: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Sifiso Mtetwa
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] James Dailey
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] James Dailey
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Felix van Hove
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Zayyad A. Said
  • Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) James Dailey
  • Re: Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) Paul
  • Re: Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) Felix van Hove
  • Re: Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) Paul
  • Re: Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) Ed Cable
  • Re: Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) James Dailey
  • Re: Mission of Fineract discussion (was Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation ...) Felix van Hove
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Petri Tuomola
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Petri Tuomola
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Kapil Panchal
  • Re: Collection Sheet Deprecation was [Re: Questions and Observations on FINERACT-2290 (Collection Sheet API Refactor)] Kapil Panchal
• New Contributor Introduction Akshat Soni
  • Re: New Contributor Introduction Ádám Sághy
  • Re: New Contributor Introduction Ahmed Adel
  • Re: New Contributor Introduction Akshat Soni
• Improvements in Teller Module Jamal Inkoom
• releases rolled, 1.10.1 EOL'd, docs Adam Monsen
  • Re: releases rolled, 1.10.1 EOL'd, docs Adam Monsen
  • Re: releases rolled, 1.10.1 EOL'd, docs Petri Tuomola
• Override the DownPayment amount at Loan Level Kigred Developer
  • Re: Override the DownPayment amount at Loan Level Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Override the DownPayment amount at Loan Level Kigred Developer
  • Re: Override the DownPayment amount at Loan Level Kigred Developer
  • Re: Override the DownPayment amount at Loan Level Paul
• Regarding foreclosure fees sidhant goel
  • Re: Regarding foreclosure fees Bharath Gowda
  • Re: Regarding foreclosure fees sidhant goel
  • Re: Regarding foreclosure fees Bharath Gowda
• Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE James Dailey
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE Ádám Sághy
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE Paul
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE Mihaly Dallos
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE James Dailey
  • Re: Replace current OAuth with OAuth 2.1 PKCE Kapil Panchal
• official docs - deps stuck Adam Monsen
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck Aleksandar Vidakovic
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck James Dailey
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck Adam Monsen
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck Adam Monsen
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck Ádám Sághy
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck Adam Monsen
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck Adam Monsen
  • Re: official docs - deps stuck James Dailey
• Request for Guidance to Start Contributing to OpenMRS abhay thakur
• Clarification on UTC Enforcement for DateTime Handling in Fineract Bhaskar Tiwari
  • Re: Clarification on UTC Enforcement for DateTime Handling in Fineract Paul
• please vote on 1.12.1 asap Adam Monsen
  • Re: please vote on 1.12.1 asap Adam Monsen
  • Re: please vote on 1.12.1 asap VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: please vote on 1.12.1 asap Adam Monsen
  • Re: please vote on 1.12.1 asap VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
• Contribution of Invoice Discounting Module to Apache Fineract prashantr
  • Re: Contribution of Invoice Discounting Module to Apache Fineract Bharath Gowda
  • RE: Contribution of Invoice Discounting Module to Apache Fineract prashantr
  • Re: Contribution of Invoice Discounting Module to Apache Fineract Avik Ganguly
• Mifos Backend Service Setup Issue Villain empire
  • Re: Mifos Backend Service Setup Issue James Dailey
• help needed with subversion for 1.12.1 release Adam Monsen
  • Re: help needed with subversion for 1.12.1 release Petri Tuomola
  • Re: help needed with subversion for 1.12.1 release Adam Monsen
• [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Bharath Gowda
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release James Dailey
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Kigred Developer
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Petri Tuomola
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Aleksandar Vidakovic
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.1 for release Ádám Sághy
  • [FINERACT] [VOTE] [RESULT] 🧾 1.12.1 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] [RESULT] 🧾 1.12.1 for release James Dailey
• Re: FINERACT-2311: Buy-Down Fee : incorrect Accounting requirements Ashok
  • Re: FINERACT-2311: Buy-Down Fee : incorrect Accounting requirements Bharath Gowda
  • Re: FINERACT-2311: Buy-Down Fee : incorrect Accounting requirements Paul
• [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳️ 1.12.0 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳️ 1.12.0 for release Kigred Developer
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳️ 1.12.0 for release Bharath Gowda
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳️ 1.12.0 for release Ádám Sághy
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.0 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.0 for release Adam Monsen
  • Re: [FINERACT] [VOTE] 🗳 1.12.0 for release Paul
• sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Adam Monsen
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Ádám Sághy
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage James Dailey
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Paul
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage James Dailey
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Aman Mittal
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Ádám Sághy
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Paul
  • Re: sonarqube quality gate, coverage metric, branches/PRs, overall usage Ádám Sághy
• [FINERACT] [ANNOUNCE] 🔀 1.12.0 release branch (was: 📦 New release 1.12.0) Adam Monsen

• Earlier messages
• Later messages