election-methods
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [EM] STV+AV
Raph Frank
Re: [EM] STV+AV
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] STV+AV
Raph Frank
[EM] Re STV+AV
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Re STV+AV
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Re STV+AV
David L Wetzell
[EM] SODA criteria
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] SODA criteria
Jameson Quinn
[EM] STV+AV.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] STV+AV.
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] STV+AV.
Bryan Mills
[EM] SODA is monotonic. Earlier failure/fix was actually for participation, not monotononicity.
Jameson Quinn
[EM] Gaming the Vote
Ted Stern
Re: [EM] Gaming the Vote
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] Gaming the Vote
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Gaming the Vote
Ted Stern
[EM] Contextuality determines relative import of criterion.
David L Wetzell
[EM] Kevin: Majority Judgement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] Kevin: Majority Judgement
Jameson Quinn
[EM] AERLO probably spoils FBC compliance.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Majority Judgement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Re : Majority Judgement
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] Majority Judgement
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Majority Judgement
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Majority Judgement
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Majority Judgement
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EM] Fwd: Majority Judgement
Jameson Quinn
[EM] Which matters more: Getting/Figuring Out the Best Single-Winner Rule or Incorporating More Multi-Winner Rules ASAP in the US?
David L Wetzell
[EM] Propose plain Approval first. Option enhancements can be later proposals.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] Propose plain Approval first. Option enhancements can be later proposals.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Propose plain Approval first. Option enhancements can be later proposals.
Juho Laatu
[EM] Looking at Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Richard Fobes
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Andy Jennings
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Andy Jennings
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet
Raph Frank
Re: [EM] [CES #4431] Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4433] Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4435] Looking at Condorcet - Runoffs
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] [CES #4433] Looking at Condorcet - Recounting
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] [CES #4437] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Andy Jennings
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Andy Jennings
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
[EM] General strategy and proposabiliy
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Strategy in two kinds of FBC/ABE methods
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Published references for CW/ Range winner relation?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Published references for CW/ Range winner relation?
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] Published references for CW/ Range winner relation?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Published references for CW/ Range winner relation?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EM] Two more 3-slot FBC/ABE solutions
C.Benham
Re: [EM] Two more 3-slot FBC/ABE solutions
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Two more 3-slot FBC/ABE solutions
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Two more 3-slot FBC/ABE solutions (not)
Chris Benham
[EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set (add-plump proofed MM)
C.Benham
[EM] One more certainty wrt electoral reform.
David L Wetzell
[EM] another re to Mike O.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Mike O.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Mike O.
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Mike O.
David L Wetzell
[EM] Supernumerary. Subnumerarity.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Bryan Mills
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Raph Frank
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Bryan Mills
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Clinton Mead
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Clinton Mead
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Bryan Mills
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Sortition and the Delegable Proxy system
Bryan Mills
[EM] Dave reply, IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] Dave reply, IRV
Jameson Quinn
[EM] SODA posting with run-on lines (hopefully) fixed.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] SODA posting with run-on lines (hopefully) fixed.
Dave Ketchum
[EM] SODA
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] SODA
Jameson Quinn
[EM] My message posted without linebreaks. Disregard. Will fix it.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Jameson reply
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] RBJ's Brief Comment on IRV debate
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] IRV debate to RBJ and Mike O
David L Wetzell
[EM] Fwd: [Offline] IRV debate to RBJ and Mike O
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Fwd: [Offline] IRV debate to RBJ and Mike O
robert bristow-johnson
[EM] Dave, Jameson: IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] Dave, Jameson: IRV
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Brief Comment on IRV debate
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Brief Comment on IRV debate
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Brief Comment on IRV debate
robert bristow-johnson
Re: [EM] Brief Comment on IRV debate
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Brief Comment on IRV debate
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Brief Comment on IRV debate
robert bristow-johnson
[EM] Brief comment about IRV discussion
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] Brief comment about IRV discussion
Jameson Quinn
[EM] TTPBA//TR is innocent. Electing A is controversial.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] TTPBA//TR is innocent. Electing A is controversial.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] 3-Slot ratings
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] My ballot didn't post correctly. Re-posting it.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] The list of ballotings didn't post well. So I'm re-posting it here
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] The list of ballotings didn't post well. So I'm re-posting it here
Ted Stern
[EM] Ballot
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Poll Update
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] TTPBA,TR
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] TTPBA,TR
Jameson Quinn
[EM] TTPBA,TR
C.Benham
[EM] MTA
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] TTPBA//TR (a 3-slot ABE solution)
C.Benham
[EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set (and MTA reviewd)
C.Benham
[EM] A few poll comments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Clarifying Enhanced DMC (AKA SPARR Voting)
Ted Stern
[EM] I should have listed SODA. The conditional methods win, _among the ballots-only methods_.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] I should have listed SODA. The conditional methods win, _among the ballots-only methods_.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EM] Oops! MMPO with summed disapprovals as an opposition elects B in ABE. FBC/ABE roundup.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] Oops! MMPO with summed disapprovals as an opposition elects B in ABE. FBC/ABE roundup.
Jameson Quinn
[EM] non-monotonicity in SODA
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] non-monotonicity in SODA
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] non-monotonicity in SODA
Jameson Quinn
[EM] CLDMMPO
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] CLDMMPO
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] CLDMMPO
fsimmons
Re: [EM] CLDMMPO
Jameson Quinn
[EM] AERLO in conditional voting. Speculations.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] SODA: polls via "like/+1/reddit"; resulting nonmonotonicity; natural fix
Jameson Quinn
[EM] CLDMM{O
fsimmons
Re: [EM] A problem with IRV3/AV3 (Jameson Quinn)
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] A problem with IRV3/AV3 (Jameson Quinn)
Jameson Quinn
[EM] I retract the posting about changing MTAOC conditionality. Answering a criticicism.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Small fix for MTAOC conditinality
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Nested Sequential Conditionality didn't seem useful. CL Disqualification MMPO (CLDMMPO)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] A problem with IRV3/AV3
Jameson Quinn
[EM] SODA description adjustment
Jameson Quinn
[EM] David: Regarding Poll
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Ted: Regarding Poll
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Poll conditionality options. Conditionality approaches. Sequential nested conditionality.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] A Bucklin-based Droop proportional method with few monotonicity problems
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EM] I now propose a mock 2012 presidential election, by parties instead of candidates.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Re: [EM] I now propose a mock 2012 presidential election, by parties instead of candidates.
Ted Stern
[EM] Perspective on FBC/ABE methods, conditional methods in particular.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Kristofer: Mono-Add-Plump
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] Three Slot Voting Equipment
fsimmons
[EM] Does Bucklin 2-level satisfy Participation (mono-add-top)?
Ted Stern
Re: [EM] Does Bucklin 2-level satisfy Participation (mono-add-top)?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Does Bucklin 2-level satisfy Participation (mono-add-top)?
Ted Stern
Re: [EM] Does Bucklin 2-level satisfy Participation (mono-add-top)?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EM] Chris: ABF grading
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[EM] MAMD (Max Assent Min Dissent)
fsimmons
Earlier messages
Later messages