On Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:01:45 PM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
>
> I think that there are many tries to separate moral from ethics: 
> indiividual versus social, innate versus cultural, emotional versus 
> rational etc.  The whole point is to obviate the m*** world as much as we 
> can, under the impression that moral is subjective and not objetive, or 
> more precisely that there is no moral that can be objective.  An there is 
> such crap as the separation of facts and values (as if values (and in 
> particular universal values) where not social facts).
>
> Well, this is a more effect of positivism which is deeply flawed in 
> theoretical and practical terms. It is a consequence also of  modern 
> gnosticism,  called progressivism of which positivism is one of the phases, 
> that believes possible in a certain future a society with a 
> perfect harmony of individual desires and social needs, making moral 
> unnecessary. 
>

I have never heard anyone who expresses progressive, liberal, or left wing 
opinions state that they believe in a future society with a perfect 
anything or that morals were unnecessary.

 
Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/yrAKTPjoVJcJ.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to