On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> to judge the quality of the prediction about which cities the Helsinki > Man will see, you've got to hear what the Washington Man has to say too if > you want to know if the prediction was correct; > > > Yes. And in the step 3 case, both confirms they see only one city, > Acording to Bruno Marchal's terminology "you" will see only one city and one city only; and "you" will see both Washington and Moscow; therefore Bruno Marchal's terminology is inconsistent in the one pee, two pee, three pee, and pee pee point of view. > contrary to what you answered many times to Quentin, you seem to agree > that if your argument is valid again the comp-indeterminacy, it is valid > against Everett formulation of QM. > I can't comment because I don't know what "comp-indeterminacy" is or understand how it is more (or is it less?) indeterminate than regular old indeterminacy. John k Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
