On 17 December 2013 07:30, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > What doesn't make sense about number 4 (the MWI explanation of >>>> indeterminacy) ? >>>> >>> > It adds nothing to number 3, >
It adds a better explanation to number 3, and removes an adhoc postulate from it. and if there were a explanation of indeterminate changes, if there were a > reason they did what they did, then they wouldn't be indeterminate. > The point of the exercise is to explain how *apparent* indeterminism arises from *actual* determinism. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
