On 09 Jul 2015, at 17:56, John Clark wrote:

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015  Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:



​> ​Just answer this. I recall that W means "I feel to be in W", and "I feel to be in M", with the "I" being the first person I,

​To hell with "THE"! ​If a person has been duplicated then there is no more "the",

In philosophy, this is called an indexical. In computer science, it is defined with the "Dx = F(xx)" diagonal technic and intensional variants. But here, when I say that "I" is "the" first person I, I use it for the notion, not for the person. It means *the* notion that we have defined using the diary etc.




it's now "a" because that's what "duplicated" means.
And "a" Helsinki Man today is anyone or anything that remembers being ​"​the​"​ Helsinki Man​ before the duplication. ​ And yes yes I know, "I confuse the 1p and the 3p"; so cure my confusion and run through the entire duplicating procedure from start to finish strictly from "*the*" first person perspective without using ambiguous personal pronouns and using "the" and "a" correctly. I'm betting you can't do it.

​> ​I recall that you have agreed that the first person experiences W and M are incompatible and belongs to separate streams of consciousness/first person experiences.

​Yes, obviously they are incompatible with each other, but neither is incompatible with the Helsinki Man if "The Helsinki Man" means something that remembers being a man in Helsinki before the duplication occurred. And if it doesn't mean that then what does it mean?

It means that, no problem. We have agreed a million times on this.

That is indeed exactly why that guy in Helsinki was able to predict that wherever he will survive he will feel unique, in a unique specific city, and a city that he could not have predicted in advance. With "he" denoting the guys remembering having been the Helsinki guy. Both of them congratulate themselves for having written in the diary, when in Helsinki: P(coffee) = 1, P(unique-city) = 1, P(W v M) = 1, and P(W & M) = 0, as the diary contains the personal, particular, experience, which mention only *one* city, in both diaries, either M, or W.

You don't succeed to justify why you don't move on step 4. You only repeat, like a bot, the same rhetorical tricks.

You failed to explain anybody why P(coffee) = 1 (on which you agreed, or at least guessed) does not entail P(unique-city) = 1.

You go out of your body at the duplication time, and never reintegrate, yes, only one body, indexically, after. You don't put yourself in the shoes of any of the continuers. But you need to do that, for each one, which is not that hard when the case is just one, or a few iteration of, duplication(s). Each one feel unique, verifying everywhere that P(unique-city) = 1 was correct.

Nobody understands your point, and the ad hominem tone adds to the idea that your agenda is not really related to the topic of the list.

Unless you change your tone and can tell me gently and politely, as clearly as possible, what is it that you do not understand in what I have just explained above, I will no more do much effort. I guess this thread becomes pretty boring for the participants. You always mock the 1p/3p distinction and then by abstracting yourself from it, you either see determinacy or ambiguity, where comp and the notion of identity on which we have agreed a million times entails what I say above, which is enough to proceed.


Bruno



  John K Clark



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to