reviews  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Review Request 65494: Add task page to Scheduler UI Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65494: Add task page to Scheduler UI Reza Motamedi
• Review Request 65488: Adding gpg key for [email protected] Renan DelValle
  • Re: Review Request 65488: Adding gpg key for [email protected] Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65488: Adding gpg key for [email protected] Bill Farner
• Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries Reza Motamedi
• Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65476: Add PartitionPolicy to config summary when defined Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
• Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65434: Ensure primary_port warning respects announcer portmap Jordan Ly
• Review Request 65433: Update Javascript Thrift to 0.10 Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65433: Update Javascript Thrift to 0.10 Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65433: Update Javascript Thrift to 0.10 Renan DelValle
  • Re: Review Request 65433: Update Javascript Thrift to 0.10 Jordan Ly
• Review Request 65339: Fix infinite loop in Task State Machine due to TASK_UNKNOWN handling David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65339: Fix infinite loop in Task State Machine due to TASK_UNKNOWN handling Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65339: Fix infinite loop in Task State Machine due to TASK_UNKNOWN handling David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65339: Fix infinite loop in Task State Machine due to TASK_UNKNOWN handling Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65339: Fix infinite loop in Task State Machine due to TASK_UNKNOWN handling Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
• Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65338: Fix error handling logic for launch failures Jordan Ly
• Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65303: Improve performance of MemTaskStore queries Jordan Ly
• Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65281: Support PARTITIONED state in SLA calculations David McLaughlin
• Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65233: Allow for injection of custom OfferSets, removed OfferOrder and OfferSelector Stephan Erb
• Review Request 65234: Print command line parameters when the scheduler starts Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65234: Print command line parameters when the scheduler starts Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65234: Print command line parameters when the scheduler starts Jordan Ly
• Review Request 65225: Allow custom data structures in HostOffers injected via Guice modules Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 65225: Allow custom data structures in HostOffers injected via Guice modules Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 65222: GitHub Pull Request template to discourage folks from making PRs Renan DelValle
  • Re: Review Request 65222: GitHub Pull Request template to discourage folks from making PRs Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65222: GitHub Pull Request template to discourage folks from making PRs Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Juan Manuel Fresia
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65076: Added ExclusionStrategy to Gson Bill Farner
• Review Request 65068: update discovery info documentation, when using mesos-dns Ruben D. Porras
  • Re: Review Request 65068: update discovery info documentation, when using mesos-dns Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 65068: update discovery info documentation, when using mesos-dns Stephan Erb
• Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64954: Refactor scheduling code to split matching and assigning phases Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Renan DelValle
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Renan DelValle
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Renan DelValle
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64934: Custom converter to allow the -thermos_executor_resources flag to take an empty string and parse it to an empty list Bill Farner
• Review Request 64825: Update packaging to latest Thrift, Mesos, and virtualenv Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64825: Update packaging to latest Thrift, Mesos, and virtualenv Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
  • Re: Review Request 64825: Update packaging to latest Thrift, Mesos, and virtualenv Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64825: Update packaging to latest Thrift, Mesos, and virtualenv Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64825: Update packaging to latest Thrift, Mesos, and virtualenv Stephan Erb
• Review Request 64824: Packaging workaround for empty strings parsed as non-empty lists Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64824: Packaging workaround for empty strings parsed as non-empty lists Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64824: Packaging workaround for empty strings parsed as non-empty lists Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64824: Packaging workaround for empty strings parsed as non-empty lists Stephan Erb
• Review Request 64629: Use java.util.Optional throughout Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64629: Use java.util.Optional throughout Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64629: Use java.util.Optional throughout Jordan Ly
• Review Request 64625: Add a storage recovery tool Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64625: Add a storage recovery tool Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64625: Add a storage recovery tool David McLaughlin
  • Re: Review Request 64625: Add a storage recovery tool Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64625: Add a storage recovery tool Reza Motamedi
  • Re: Review Request 64625: Add a storage recovery tool Bill Farner
• Review Request 64534: Reproduce Kerberos Python Build Issues Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64534: Reproduce Kerberos Python Build Issues Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64534: Reproduce Kerberos Python Build Issues Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64534: Reproduce Kerberos Python Build Issues Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64534: Reproduce Kerberos Python Build Issues Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64534: Reproduce Kerberos Python Build Issues Aurora ReviewBot
• Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Jordan Ly
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64523: Attempt #2 to fix flaky Webhook test Stephan Erb
• Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Aurora ReviewBot
  • Re: Review Request 64519: Add a test to detect incompatible storage changes Jordan Ly
• Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Bill Farner
  • Re: Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64508: Convert carriage returns to newlines in reviews Stephan Erb
• Review Request 64482: Fix flaky WebhookTest Stephan Erb
  • Re: Review Request 64482: Fix flaky WebhookTest Aurora ReviewBot

• Earlier messages
• Later messages