[droolers] java interp...

2001-10-19 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay, as mentioned previously, drools is 100% New Code, still. Instead of starting with Natural Language functionality, though, I'm opting for the simpler java syntax, interpreted at run-time. Instead of using BeanShell or some other black-box expression interpreter, I'm of course, rolling my o

[droolers] test...

2001-11-10 Thread bob mcwhirter
Testing the jab.org mailarchive, again... -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

[droolers] alpha-3

2001-11-16 Thread bob mcwhirter
Hokie dokie. Alpha-3 is now out, and is the first announced version of the new Rete-OO method of doing things. Undocumented and virtually untested. See test_data/Minimal.drl for an example rule. It's the one we've seen in the mail-list here recently. Many things don't work (initialization up

[droolers] drools v2.x

2001-11-27 Thread bob mcwhirter
After making radical changes, I decided that the drools 1.x series was purely for research, and Real Work begins with drools 2.x. Anyhow, I just imported my most recent ramblings, which is a semantic-model independent implementation of the Rete-OO algorithm. Will soon be providing a semantic mo

[droolers] Yeahaw

2001-11-27 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay everyone. Go sync down the drools-2 CVS module. ./build.pl clean all test Watch some rules get applied to XML documents. There's org.drools.RoughDom4jTest which looks for two documents: doc #1 ... doc #2 ... One must

[droolers] imagine the possibilities...

2001-11-27 Thread bob mcwhirter
Now that I'm playing with the dom4j example more, I'm starting to see the possibilities. ...Build on top of JMS, and have an XML router that accepts documents, and publishes them to different topics based upon their root elements, and values of attributes and/or elements. ...Build an agent that

Re: [droolers] drools v2.x

2001-11-28 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Hello, my name is Marc Carrion, Howdy Marc! > I'm working in a project that needs some inference engine, by now > Drools is the framework that fill more of our requests. We would like > to colaborate with you, if possible, in the developing of Drools. Absolutely. All are welcome. Right n

[droolers] Re: JSR 94, the Rule Engine API?

2001-11-29 Thread bob mcwhirter
Yeah, possibly. I need to execute a personal JSCP agreement with Sun, because I don't think The Day Job has any interest in me doing this on company time (unlike the JDOM JSR). So far, I haven't been intrigued, due to a lack of information as to what they are really doing. Any clue? -

[droolers] test

2001-10-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
Testing new archiver... ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

[droolers] www.drools.org

2001-10-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
Initial draft of the website. (copy/paste from Jaxen, so let me know if I forgot to edit something correctly). http://drools.org/ Also, released 1.0-alpha-1. Pretty much a useless release, but had to have something to point the website/download.html at. -bob ___

[droolers] RETE (Object-Oriented)

2001-10-10 Thread bob mcwhirter
!! warning: long and probably boring !! Just wanted to commit some thoughts to archives before I forget this. Haven't seen this in print anywhere, but I'm not claiming it's necessarily new. Just an epiphany on my part. Normal RETE: Most things are us

Re: [droolers] Speaking English...

2001-10-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Sounds cool. Other nice languages to be able to read for your rule base > could be... > > Java code. > > person.getName().equals( "James" ); > > XPath.. > > //person[name='James'] > > Or another thing to track could be RuleML which seems to be an XML markup > language for specifying

Re: [droolers] Re: A question pertaining to DROOL's

2001-10-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
Howdy John (thanks for the pointer deref, James)-- drools is still trying to find its way, at this point. It started as an independant project, but now it's looking like (hopefully) my Day Job will buy into it also. While the current code-base is 'from scratch', I may actually start over again

RE: [droolers] Re: A question pertaining to DROOL's

2001-10-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
t; -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bob > mcwhirter > Sent: October 13, 2001 10:30 AM > To: James Strachan > Cc: John P.Sheppard; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [droolers] Re: A question pertaining to DROOL's > &g

Re: [droolers] Future Directions

2001-10-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I finally had some time to look at this in detail. While I can't say I > understand it completely yet I do understand enough to see that it looks > pretty good so far. > > I was going to do the UML class diagram's for it; but you mentioned that > you might abandon the current implementation for

Re: [droolers] Re: A question pertaining to DROOL's

2001-10-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
> [ re: shipment rating, carriers, tariffs, etc ] Gosh, you're in logistics too? May I ask for whom? I felt like I was reading mail that I'd sent myself... > > It started as an independant project, but now it's looking like > > (hopefully) my Day Job will buy into it also. > > That sounds

[droolers] update...

2001-10-17 Thread bob mcwhirter
Hokie dokie. Day Job hasn't bought into the rules-engine idea Just Yet, so I'm going to proceed down the drools path as 100% new development. Due to .Net considerations and such, I *will* make the rule parser a modular component. As long as something implements Parser, and builds expression tr

Re: [droolers] My understanding of JSR 92

2001-12-01 Thread bob mcwhirter
Yah, that's about what I've gotten out of the proposal. I see that it narrowly got approved, "with strong reservations" from most of the voting members. But still, what does it mean? Is it a standardization of the assert(..) retract(..) and modify(..) actions of working with facts within a w

[droolers] jaxen-core.jar

2001-12-01 Thread bob mcwhirter
Just curious, did someone update the jaxen-core.jar in the lib/ directory. Two days ago, the build worked. Now it doesn't. Anyhow, I've removed jaxen-core.jar, and we only have jaxen-full.jar in the lib/ now. -bob ___ drools-interest maili

[droolers] Doin' some werk today...

2001-12-06 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okie dokie... Today, I think I'm going to werk on drools some, particularly the Java Semantic Module. An adjunct to that would be a java-centric 'rules file' format. I'm thinking, though, that the action of a rule still should be compiled code, at this point. Thus, I'm pondering a format like

Re: [droolers] Doin' some werk today...

2001-12-06 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Stuart Schmukler wrote: > Bob, > > The format you propose is interesting. I believe that it is > on flexible enough. Both the condition and the action should be > expressions, otherwise the format is just some kind of dymanic > preprocessor. > > I believe that one of your

[droolers] java semantic module

2001-12-06 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay, I'm still going to need access to the Java expression AST. I don't really want to write a Java statement evaluator all by myself, so I think I'm going to use the ANTLR Java grammar, and instrument the AST-walker. I know there's an issue with antlr.jar conflicting with an older version tha

[droolers] Java semantics

2001-12-06 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay... It should now be possible to write rules with Java semantics. We still don't have a convenient rules-file interface, but using the API, you can create several types of Java FactExtractors. There's a Darn Simple One, where you get an object, cast it, and do whatever you want to with it.

[droolers] java rules file

2001-12-08 Thread bob mcwhirter
Here's the plan: Using the antlr-based java grammar for the basis of the java rules file. But, once I've parsed and analyzed what I need, we'll actully pass all execution over to beanshell (beanshell.org), so as to avoid having to write an interpreter ourselves. Following this method, I think t

Re: [droolers] java rules file

2001-12-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
> A moderately complex rule-based task that comes to mind is a > calendar-scheduling sytem. It should respect holidays, find open times > for meetings and resources, handle recurring events, schedule subsequent > events based on current event type, etc... Ayup, that'd be cool. Due to my Day Job

Re: [droolers] java rules file

2001-12-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, bob mcwhirter wrote: > > What will/does the java rules file syntax look like? > > Roughly: > > ruleset MyRuleSet > { > rule myRule(Foo rootFact1, Bar rootFact2) > { Nope, I lied. At least Right Now, it'll be an XML format.

Re: [droolers] java rules file

2001-12-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
On 9 Dec 2001, Nathan E Probst wrote: > Awww...phooey! Why the sudden change of heart? I like the looks of the > syntax below very much. XML, I suppose, is easier to parse, etc... Is > that temporary arrangement? Mostly due to ease of implementation to get something going. Nothing will limi

[droolers] bsf integration

2001-12-10 Thread bob mcwhirter
The bsf integration is going pretty smoothly. We now have a BeanShellAction that runs your script (a String) through BeanShell, letting actions be a run-time thing. Looking like I can dedicate most of this week to drools, so hopefully we'll have something stable and useful by week's end. I'm

Re: [droolers] bsf integration

2001-12-11 Thread bob mcwhirter
> We wanted that the user will be able to define his owns rules, the facts > will be represented in rdf (this will be our model, but is easy to > transform to ruleml). Our main problem is the velocity, we need a very fast > rule engine, so we will try with different engines, maybe we will develo

Re: [droolers] bsf integration

2001-12-11 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > For me velocity is the priority. I don't care about the rest, my users > will not use the engine directly, they will have an easier interface. > > Just another question. Is it posible to have a fact database and a rule > database and at the e

Re: [droolers] bsf integration

2001-12-11 Thread bob mcwhirter
On 11 Dec 2001, Nathan E Probst wrote: > Well, I've always thought that Easy of Use trumps Speed. You can buy > faster hardware, but programmer productivity is relatively fixed! That's my take on it all, too. > Since this is an OSS project, Extensibility and Modularity are definate > virtues

[droolers] Wicked (We now have a rules-file format)

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okie dokie-- The integration with BeanShell/ANTLR seems mostly complete. In CVS, look at $ROOT/test_data/ruleset.xml, which I've handily reproduced here. I still need to create a friendly API for building RuleSets, and such, but, we can now read .xml files that contain rules. Filter condition

Re: [droolers] Wicked (We now have a rules-file format)

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
[[ cc:'d to the list ]] > I'm having problems trying to access to cvs, we are using a proxy that > almost never works :( Hmmm... Then tarballs work best for you, right? I'll see if I can't get nightly snapshots auto-building for ya. Might be a few days, though. James-- You have

[droolers] unplug

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
Well kids, I'm unplugging for the night. I think the Java Semantic Module is Done. I've included ease-of-use features. Tomorrow, I'll work on examples and end-user documentation (as opposed to simply the nearly-complete JavaDocs). Now's the time to start banging on it, and let me know what yo

Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I am very interested in making a workflow engine (as I'm sure others on this > list are interested in doing) and I wanted to know if anything has started > in earnest based on drools? Probably not, due to the ethereal nature of drools up until Today. > In the project I work on (Tambora, tambor

Re: [droolers] IRC

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Is there an IRC room anywhere for drools? Not as of right now. Isn't there some open-source IRC network? If so, could you blurp me some connection information, and we could pull up #drools. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL

[droolers] 2.0-beta-1 is available

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay, pushed out a zipfile and tarball of 2.0-beta-1. Have fun. Some examples (and probably beta-2) will come tomorrow. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

[droolers] IRC

2001-12-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
Thanks to the suggestion by Jason, I've located an IRC network I think we can use. http://openprojects.nu/irc_servers.shtml I'll probably be idling in the #drools channel. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[droolers] sorting? aggregation?

2001-12-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay... In CVS now is a Supply-and-Demand example, which attempts to match up buyers and seller. ./build.pl examples Anyhow, this has shown me that we might need some more functionality in the core engine. While it does successfully match a buyer who's willing to pay what a seller wa

[droolers] TransactionalWorkingMemory

2001-12-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
Howdy folks.. Just added RuleBase.createTransactionalWorkingMemory() which creates, well, a TransactionalWorkingMemory. The TWM extends normal WorkingMemory, but adds commit() and abort() methods. It basically just caches assert/modify/retract calls until commit() is called, and then performs

[droolers] drools-commits

2001-12-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay, hopefully in the next 6-24 hours, according to sf.net, we'll have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for watching commits to the codeline. If this works, then I'll go ahead and modify my other projects to also do this. Still haven't figured out a handy way to do nightly builds. -bob

Re: [droolers] sorting? aggregation?

2001-12-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
tion. -bob > > I hope this helps. I'll try to be clearer about the explanation > when I figure out a better way to express it in terms of the DROOLS > engine. > > Stuart > > BTW, ILOG has introduced 'collections' and collection rules to > en

[droolers] drools-commits is now active

2001-12-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay, you can now subscribe to drools-commits, and see the changes fly by. I guess this means I need to start writing better commit messages. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf

[droolers] fish monger

2001-12-14 Thread bob mcwhirter
For those of you doing side-by-side evaluations of rules engines, I've added an example to the drools distribution the models the shopping-cart in a fish-store example that ILOG uses in one of their whitepapers. It's in CVS now, and will be available in a daily build tonight at 12:40am eastern t

[droolers] new IRC information

2001-12-15 Thread bob mcwhirter
New IRC server. OpenProjects IRC servers were weak, and Jon Stevens (of jakarta-apache fame) has offered the use of his IRC server: server: irc.whichever.com:6667 channel: #drools -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

[droolers] temporal conditions

2001-12-15 Thread bob mcwhirter
After talking to Stuart and Jason and Dave, along with reading the various JRules papers, it seems there are a few concepts of time: 1) Time as a condition event: when: cinderalla.getLocation() == ROYAL_PALACE; clock.strike

[droolers] Temporal rules...

2001-12-17 Thread bob mcwhirter
Okay, drools now handles temporal rules of one flavor (more flavors to come lateron). To a block, you can now add a sub-element which becomes a durational condition. ticket.getStatus() == Ticket.NEW

Re: [droolers] Temporal rules...

2001-12-17 Thread bob mcwhirter
> To a block, you can now add a sub-element > which becomes a durational condition. > > > Actually, there are several attributes you can use, in any combination: -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL

[droolers] new elements and ...?

2001-12-17 Thread bob mcwhirter
I'd like to start a quick discussion... I'm thinking of adding to conditions, to allow for a rule to only match at a particular time: bob.isIdle() This rule would only be checked at 10am and 2pm. Al

Re: [droolers] Temporal rules...

2001-12-17 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I think that it is a mistake to fix the time unit to milliseconds. > The having an external method of setting the time removes the limitations > of the processor speed. I'm not certain that I follow. Plus, I've actually opted for only 1-second granularity. Good enough for government work? > T

Re: [droolers] Gee, it's quiet around here...too quiet...

2002-01-11 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I hope that everyone had wonderful holiday and that work on Drools will > continue... drools is paused, since I've no customers asking for modifications at the moment. As soon as someone needs work done on it, I'll gear back up. Meanwhile, I'm knee-deep in genetic algorithms, if anyone has a

Re: [droolers] :) dolls dependancy

2002-01-14 Thread bob mcwhirter
Right. drools currently does create 2 different nodes in the rete network; one for each condition. Some extra intelligence could be added to consolidate those conditions which are simply different flavors of the same fact (ie, negated and not negated). -bob On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Stuart

Re: [droolers] comparison with JESS

2002-01-14 Thread bob mcwhirter
To be honest, no clue. JESS still seems non-OO, to me, in that you're still writing cambridge-prefix types of rules. It's interpreted, as is the Java Semantic Module of drools, so it may be similar. I do think JESS has highly optimized their Rete network, though, so they may beat us. Someone

Re: [droolers] Trying to get a clue.

2002-01-28 Thread bob mcwhirter
> This is a new area for me ( but exciting! ). Glad to have you on board! > I'm experimenting with using drools for filtering datasets. > > In my case so far, I have basically 4 rules with varying parameters. > > One of the rules looks something like this: > > loop over a collection of beans

Re: [droolers] (no subject)

2002-02-16 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Whats up with the drools.org site i havent been able to connect to it for > nearly a week. Yikes! You're right. My nightly-build cron job must be futzing. I'll try to get it back online in the next day or so. -bob ___ drools-interest ma

Re: [droolers] Behaviour of conditions

2002-02-19 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Maybe I have misunderstood things, but I think this is a bit odd. > > If I have a method getName() in a java object and use that as a > condition, like this: > > someObject.getName().equals(""); > > > and then modify that object in the actions of another rule, like

Re: [droolers] defining rules in text files ...

2002-02-19 Thread bob mcwhirter
> It looks like you can only define rules in XML - do you plan to support > any other representation in the future ? Howdy Robert-- There's support for any one to write any representation they want. I did XML originally because: 1) dom4j (by your friend'n'mine, James Strachan) makes

[droolers] website

2002-02-19 Thread bob mcwhirter
fyi-- www.drools.org is back online. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

Re: [droolers] Cooks tour/README available?

2002-02-20 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Just downloaded drools 2.0 beta 1, but having trouble > understanding how to get started. I can tell by the mailing archives > that there are people out there evaluating rules and using the tool, so > I must be missing something. Is there a 'Cooks tour' or some sort of > Hello World docu

Re: [droolers] Cooks tour/README available?

2002-02-20 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I'm really using it. It's part of a very large web application. On my list > of things to do is add a non-programmer type language for descibing rules. > Probably with some sort of web-based UI. Woo-hoo! > Some examples of using just the API would be useful. When you say "using just the AP

Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2002-02-24 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I was just reading the Drool mailing list and came > across a posting on workflow. I was wondering if > anyone had started an effort on a workflow engine. I think Jason van Zyl was originally planning on doing it, and I was hoping to assist. As far as I know, thus far, nothing has been done.

[droolers] Priorities..

2002-03-12 Thread bob mcwhirter
Pretty dumb order-in-which-loaded priorities for firing rules now exist in CVS. Will Some Day make it more flexible so you can set your own priorities, but for now, only the order the rules are loaded into the rule-base count. This includes order of the rules-files, and order of rules within th

Re: [droolers] New Example - Email Rule Engine with Customizable User Rules

2002-03-21 Thread bob mcwhirter
Martin-- Thanks for sharing this with everyone. Having RealWorld(tm) examples of drools is a very good thing. I'll incorporate your changes so you don't have to work with a modified code-base. In the future, if you need a feature, just ask, and I'll try to hack it into the CVS mainline for yo

Re: [droolers] CVS connections and some comments.

2002-03-29 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Stuart Schmukler wrote: > I have been trying to get up to speed with DROOLS now that I have the time. > It seems that the cvs.drools.org does not exist. It is mentioned on the > Drools.org pages. Yah, I think sourceforge moved servers around, and broke that link. I think

[droolers] Sudden interest?

2002-04-28 Thread bob mcwhirter
Does anyone, right off hand, know what might've spiked a sudden interest in drools? Looking at the sourceforge.net statistics page, we went from an average of 3-4 downloads a day to 126 downloads yesterday. Any clue who's talking about us or linking to us? -bob

[droolers] I'm back...

2002-05-21 Thread bob mcwhirter
To everyone addressed in one way or another by this message... I'm back in The States now from Amsterdam, much relaxed. Once I readjust my internal clock by 6 hours, I'll be functional and working on the various projects again. -bob ___

Re: [droolers] Rete

2002-05-22 Thread bob mcwhirter
Re: Forgy's paper. I was unable to locate a digital copy anywhere. You *may* be able to contact Carnegie-Mellon Univerisyt (cmu.edu), and try to get a copy of his thesis, or similar. -bob ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS

Re: [droolers] drools-2 is the right CVS image?

2002-05-22 Thread bob mcwhirter
Ayup. -bob On Mon, 13 May 2002, James Strachan wrote: > Just checking; is the drools-2 the correct CVS image to work from these > days? > > James > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.

[droolers] Examples, etc...

2002-05-22 Thread bob mcwhirter
Howdy folks-- Catching up on email, and I've had lots of requests for the examples, etc. They didn't make it into the tarball, but I figured everyone was using CVS. Apparently not. So, this week, I'm going to jump back into drools, and try to press out another beta tarball, complete with exam

Re: [droolers] example

2002-05-23 Thread bob mcwhirter
Howdy-- Please just send plaintext mail to the list, as HTML can be difficult for some folks (ie, me) to deal with. fwiw, drools tarballs are out-of-date, especially with regards to the examples. I plan to correct that soon, but until I do, you may desire to simply use drools from the CVS repo

Re: [droolers] Drools - Builder

2002-05-23 Thread bob mcwhirter
Not certain what's up with all the messages and recalls, but... The attachableNodes is a set of all nodes that still need to be attached to the RETE network. Basic premise is to iterate over the attachableNodes set until it's empty, which indicates that all nodes have been attached into the act

Re: [droolers] Drools - Builder

2002-05-23 Thread bob mcwhirter
Oh, to further explain... Sometimes, we'll take 2 nodes out of the attachableNodes set, create a JoinNode with the 2 nodes as children, and place the join back into the set, as it hasn't yet been glued to the tree, I think. ie: ## Start with 2 nodes... an = { node-A, node-B } ## Remove them

Re: [droolers] Rete

2002-05-27 Thread bob mcwhirter
AssignmentNodes are *sometimes* the column-generator nodes. name = person.getName() That takes a table with only a 'person' column, and it generates a matching 'name' column, populated with the name of the person. AssignmentNodes are *sometimes* the join-nodes. name = otherNam

Re: [droolers] Rete

2002-05-27 Thread bob mcwhirter
In old-style (ie, traditional lisp/cambridge-prefix) rules engine, that defines a rule that finds cousins. The "(defrule cousin" starts the rule, and names it. It's followed by 3 patterns that define what matches the rule. The first two patterns are asserting a parent/child relationship:

Re: [droolers] Rete

2002-05-27 Thread bob mcwhirter
Actually, AssignmentNodes are never JoinNodes. But, things that look like assignment statements may result in either an AssignmentNode or a JoinNode. Just to clarify. -bob On Mon, 27 May 2002, bob mcwhirter wrote: > > AssignmentNodes are *sometimes* the column-generator

Re: [droolers] License compatibility with LGPL

2002-05-28 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I am interested in the use of Drools, and I have read the license in > CVS and it seems to be compatible for the use together with an LGPL API. > Am I right or have I not well interpreted the Drools' license? I believe that the ASF/BSD license is compatible with the LGPL. You may want to chec

Re: [droolers] what is "duration"?

2002-05-29 Thread bob mcwhirter
A duration is a way to say how long a rule must hold true before firing. ie, you may have a rule that only 100 people can fit in this room. But, you don't call the cops until more than 100 people have been in the room for over 5 minutes. With the escalation example, the duration basically is us

Re: [droolers] Last node in Builder class

2002-05-29 Thread bob mcwhirter
The way RETE works, is you start with a single root node in your tree. The tree gets wider as you add various column-generator nodes to it, and starts to get narrowed back down as your use join-nodes to combine 2 nodes into 1 in the next level of the tree. Eventually, the last level will contai

Re: [droolers] Drools and Maven

2002-06-02 Thread bob mcwhirter
On 2 Jun 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi Bob, > > If you can give me the versions of the dependencies that drools has I > will whip up a Maven descriptor. antlr-2.7.1 bsh-1.2b3 dom4j-core (1.1 or whatever is latest) jaxen-1.0-FCS saxpath-1.0-FCS

[droolers] Explanation..

2002-06-02 Thread bob mcwhirter
For those of you who aren't in the know... Maven is Jason van Zyl's new Jakarta project that makes building projects a lot easier and nicer. Maven will end up making projects a lot more consistent in their build and release methodologies, which is a Good Thing. So, drools CVS source code may

Re: [droolers] Maven POM

2002-06-02 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Here's the first crack at a POM. The repository will have to be > structured a bit and the POM updated slight. If you give me access I > would be glad to do a little reorg. Good prep for the workflow endeavor You've now got developer Karma for drools-2 CVS on sourceforge. Feel free to go ahead

[droolers] New and improved..!

2002-06-03 Thread bob mcwhirter
Howdy folks-- drools has now been almost completely mavenized. So, if you want to build drools these days, you'll need maven: http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/maven/ You'll also need ant installed globally on your machine, along with junit in ${ant.home}/lib. No more build.pl script

Re: [droolers] JESS and JSR 94 compatibility

2002-06-13 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Is there any attempt being made to maintain interface compatibility with > JSR 94 ? I haven't seen the final spec for JSR 94, but from what I had learned, a while ago, it really doesn't address many aspects of rules engines. > In other words, if I wrote my application to use Drools, and I wa

Re: [droolers] RDF module

2002-06-29 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I'm going to have a crack at a semantic module for drools to allow it to > process RDF data. I'm going to have to do a fair bit of experimentation, but > my starting points are going to be : > > aiming towards input/output from drools in RDF, and manipulation of drools' > wm based on RDF declar

Re: [droolers] OT: maven cvs

2002-07-03 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Danny Ayers wrote: > Hi folks, > Just been trying to get Maven going, wasted a lot of time with the download > packages so now trying to get the cvs. Unfortunately it keeps timing out on > the login. Does this look ok? : Apache seems to be having CVS issues, at the moment. W

[droolers] [administrivia] drools migration

2002-07-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
Due to various reasons, I'm currently in the process of moving my projects away from SourceForge. drools will get a new home at http://drools.werken.com/ sometime soon. Meanwhile, I've already discontinued using sf.net's CVS and this will be the last message that I send/read to the dr

Re: [droolers] package & RDF

2002-07-18 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Hope all is well. Yah, finally got drools compiling against the latest Maven. > Quick question - where's the package fr.dyade.jdring from? www.dyade.fr, somewhere, I'd guess. ;) It's a scheduler. And I think we're not using it anymore, since JDK 1.3 has a lightweight scheduler built in. O

[droolers] Re: package & RDF

2002-07-18 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Danny Ayers wrote: > Hope all is well. btw, let's move this discussion over to the new home at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

[droolers] Re: change suggestions

2002-07-18 Thread bob mcwhirter
Great thoughts. If you don't mind, head to http://jira.werken.com/ and file them there. > 2. Abstract Interpreter > If the scripting bit in org.drools.semantic.java was abstracted out some > more (i.e. having a drools Interpreter interface etc.) then it should be > straightforward to add other

Re: [droolers] Rules!

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
t; mahi > > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ >

Re: [droolers] Rules!

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
t; > Thanx > > mahi > > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______ > drools-inter

Re: [droolers] Values in the objects

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
Howdy-- Since you're still using the 'old' sourceforge list, I'm not convinced you're using the latest code. If you don't mind, please subscribe to the new list (info available through http://drools.org/) and repost your questions/bugs once you've determined you're using the latest code. Als

Re: [droolers] Evaluation of Rules

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
_ > drools-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest > -- Bob McWhirter[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Werken Company http://werken.com/ --- This sf.net emai

RE: [droolers] Order of Rules!

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
gt; > > > > >Hi > >Can any body please tell me how to control the order of > >execution of the > >rules in a rule set > >thanx > >mahi > > > > > > > >--- > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >Welcome to geek heaven. > &

Re: [droolers] Rules!

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
Both the types? > > Thanx > mahi > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > drools-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.source

Re: [droolers] Order of Rules!

2002-08-09 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, John Pritchard wrote: > hi Maheedhar, > > there is no control over the ordering of rules' evaluation. No, drools does follow a rule's priority, which currently is defined only as the order in which rules are added to a RuleBase. More flexibility will be added soon. > the e

[droolers] Update (fwd)

2002-08-10 Thread bob mcwhirter
Just forwarding this to the old list for folks who haven't migrated to the new list. -bob -- Forwarded message -- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: bob mcwhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 03:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Update Howdy folks--