Hi George and others who have also missed the Apr/May issue of QUANTA eMag,
After considerable investigation, it would appear that having sent the
Apr/May Issue of QUANTA eMag out in two batches, I may have sent the
same batch out twice! Some time ago, I sent out the eMag out as one
batch but
; None received since then. I did email John Gilpin last week, but no reply
>> as yet.
>>
>>
>> Michael
>> Dilwyn wrote:
>>
>>> I've forwarded this to committee members (don't know the answer myself),
>>> hopefully a rep
on't know the answer
> myself), > >> hopefully a reply soon. > >> > >> Dilwyn > >> > >>
> -Original Message- > >> From: sba1derson via Ql-Users > >> Sent:
> Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM > >> To:
> On 23 Jul 2017, at 19:35, John Southern via Ql-Users
> wrote:
>
> Simon, Michael, Ian, you should have all received copies up to and
> including April/May 2017.
The latest QUANTA I have received is FEB/MAR 2017.
George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
om: sba1derson via Ql-Users
>> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM
>> To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
>> Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine
>>
>> Has anyone received an electronic copy of Quanta magazine since the
>> January/February 2017 issue? I've not received
From: sba1derson via Ql-Users
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM
> To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
> Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine
>
> Has anyone received an electronic copy of Quanta magazine since the
> January/February 2017 issue? I've not received one since. I've conta
eply soon.
>
> Dilwyn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sba1derson via Ql-Users
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM
> To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
> Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine
>
> Has anyone received an electronic copy of Quanta magazine since the
> January/Fe
I've forwarded this to committee members (don't know the answer myself),
hopefully a reply soon.
Dilwyn
-Original Message-
From: sba1derson via Ql-Users
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine
Has anyone received an
Has anyone received an electronic copy of Quanta magazine since the
January/February 2017 issue? I've not received one since. I've contacted
Quanta via their website but so far have had no response.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
--
From: "Rich Mellor"
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:17 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election?
One part of the proposed coalit
At 15:26 22/03/2011 +, you wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election?
You can, it's called tactical voting
I am unlikely to see the agenda for the AGM, is there an item :-
When and in which brewery to hild the next piss0up
Rich Mellor wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national
election?
It doesn't matter who you vote for or against in national elections.
A government always gets in ;-)
Dilwyn Jones
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-
On 22 Mar 2011, at 15:17, Rich Mellor wrote:
>
> I do tend to agree with this point, as it does allow for the dismissal of
> directors - however, the constitution is silent, and this should form part of
> the discussion about the constitution at the AGM.
>
Clause 8.13 of the QUANTA Constitut
On 22/03/2011 15:13, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote:
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulate
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote:
> On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
>> On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
>>
>>> There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to
>>> approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members
>>> before
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM
- it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those mem
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
> There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
> the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the
> AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those members who normally
> receive a p
On 22/03/2011 12:52, John Gilpin wrote:
out 6 years, hoping that a person would volunteer to take on this very
exacting role - literally jumped into the deep end early in February
and (with a little assistance) produced a very creditable issue, only
to find that she had so much material left to
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for
the
AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which
has
delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take
their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents
will
b
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the
AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has
delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take
their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will
be made available at th
As an example of my email earlier, I am grateful to Dilwyn Jones (all of
them!) for bring my attention to John Taylor's observation of the
unfortunate error which occurred in the March edition of the QUANTA
Magazine Volume 28 Issue 2 where the account's Income and Expenditure
account has been d
The latest issue of QUANTA Magazine Vol 27 Iss 4 has also been posted
today. Not such a bumper issue this time due to lack of content!! Sorry.
No sign of QLToday yet in the UK.
Regards,
John Gilpin.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon
Hi all,
Please note that as QUANTA are in the process of changing editors for
the Magazine will you please send ALL contributions to:-
editor AT quanta dot org dot uk
This will ensure that your contributions get to the editor who is
handling the current issue.
Thanks,
John Gilpin.
_
t rather than the old Dot Matrix which is coming towards the end
of its useful life - don't we all!?!?
Cheers,
John Gilpin.
Joint QUANTA Editor.
- Original Message - From: "Jochen Merz"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magaz
Secondly, I am concerned about the damaged envelopes which some of you are
getting. In order to minimise costs, I buy these envelopes in bulk, and it
takes about 7 issues to use the quantity. It may be that the self sealing
adhesive dries out during this period as I have noticed that occasionally
Hi John (Gilpin)
Thanks for your work with QUANTA
Re your:
Please keep me informed of this
problem over the next few issues - whether yours is damaged OR NOT (to get
some idea of balance) - it may be worth asking the PO to investigate.
My envelope
John Gilpin wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Firstly, thank you to those readers of QUANTA Magazine who have said how
much they have enjoyed the latest issues.
I agree - best for a long time
My envelope was tattered and torn along the bottom - just to be different!
I have recently cancelled my standing
its
useful life - don't we all!?!?
Cheers,
John Gilpin.
Joint QUANTA Editor.
- Original Message -
From: "Jochen Merz"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1
Hi Malcolm,
I received the Friday 27th Fe
Hi Malcolm,
I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26,
Issue 1, for February / March 2009.
I received it as well.
Yes, well done - and I prefer to see the ads in "full page mode" again -
excellent decision. And up-to-date :-)
One other point. Is anyone else exper
Hi.
I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26,
Issue 1, for February / March 2009.
Which means that it has now caught up on the gap that had unfortunately
opened up with filling of the editorial position.
Well done again to John Gilpin for getting this situation
d others for your kind comments. They are much appreciated.
Regards,
John Gilpin.
QUANTA Joint Magazine Editor.
- Original Message - From: "Malcolm Cadman"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:33 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6
Hi,
I have
- Original Message -
From: "Dilwyn Jones"
To: "QL-Users list"
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6
Geoff Wicks wrote:
Actually, in the months I've been on the committee I've start
On 4 Feb 2009, at 20:32, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I hope everyone will be able to appreciate that John Gilpin has done
remarkable work with the magazine (he also holds two other committee
posts!).
I certainly agree.
Well done.
George
___
QL-Users Ma
Thank you - and others for your kind comments. They are much appreciated.
Regards,
John Gilpin.
QUANTA Joint Magazine Editor.
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Cadman"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:33 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue
Geoff Wicks wrote:
It still rankles me that, when Dilwyn resigned as editor of QL Today after
9 years of hard work, only one reader wrote to say thank you.
What, for resigning, or for 9 years of work?
;-))
Actually, in the months I've been on the committee I've started to
appreciate how much w
- Original Message -
From: "Dilwyn Jones"
To: "QL-Users list"
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6
I hope everyone will be able to appreciate that John Gilpin has done
remarkable work with t
Also, the previous magazine was Volume 25, Issue 4, Aug/Sept/Oct 2008.
Which suggests that an Issue 5 has been missed out.
I know that with the delays in the magazine production this may be
deliberate. Yet it will also confuse any collectors of the magazine in
the future.
Err, yes. John Gilpin
Hi,
I have received today - 4th February 2009 - the Quanta magazine Volume
25, Issue 6, which covers Nov/Dec 2008/Jan 2009.
It is a good read, so well done to everyone involved.
However, I did notice that it arrived in a very battered envelope with
an apology from the Post Office. I do not
Evening Geoff,
> PS Please forgive the levity of the email, but today is a very special
> day. As a sign of respect to our two Scottish QL Today writers I had a
> rather large wee dram with my haggis, tatties and neeps.
Now, who could they be I wonder?
Cheers,
Norman.
PS. Full of finest Scotch
- Original Message -
From: "John Gilpin"
To: "ql-users"
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 11:41 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine
Even Geoff might have a few words to say but then it'll be 'Just
Words'.{:-))
I don't think you w
The QUANTA Magazine is almost back to its target dates with a bumper 52 Page
issue for the November / December / January issue already at the printers. I
hope to get it out before the end of the month by post with the Email
version ready to go **NOW**.
Our next issue promises to be something a
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Cadman"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4
Hi,
I received my copy on 15th January 2009 of the Quanta magazine, Volume 25,
Issue 4.
Although late, due to Editorial is
- Original Message -
From: "Dilwyn Jones"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4
If you have opted to receive the Quanta magazine as a PDF via email, there
is a roundabout way of extracting the listing
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
This Issue also benefits from having few long program listings. Listings
are OK if they are relatively short. However, both the short and the
longer listings are prone to printing and transcription errors. So, better
if supplied on a media of some type every now and again
Hi,
I received my copy on 15th January 2009 of the Quanta magazine, Volume
25, Issue 4.
Although late, due to Editorial issues. That have already been
acknowledged. I must congratulate John Gilpin, the Editor, and the
Contributors; for producing a very interesting Issue of the magazine.
W
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Wicks"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine (was Room Rates at Allesley Hotel)
Under the constitution volume 26 issue 1 has to be with members before 29th
>March 2009 and you cannot
- Original Message -
From: "John Gilpin"
To: "ql-users"
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:00 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] Room Rates at Allesley Hotel
NOTE:- The long awaited August/September/October issue of QUANTA >Magazine
will be delivered from the printers on Monday. This means th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Gilpin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi John,
Thanks for the message, and good luck in keeping the Quanta Magazine
together.
Your personal effort is recognised and appreciated.
In an effort to avoid any erroneous "Grapevine" comments causing
concern to QU
seriously undermanned committee.
Best Wishes,
Geoff
- Original Message -
From: "John Gilpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ql-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 1:01 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine
In an effort to avoid an
In an effort to avoid any erroneous "Grapevine" comments causing concern to
QUANTA Members (and others) I am making the following statement on behalf of
the current QUANTA Committee:-
"Due to not receiving any response to communications sent to our new
Magazine Editor - Tony Hill - over a now
promptly.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Gilpin
> QUANTA Membership Secretary.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "QLUsers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 6:33 PM
> Subject: [ql-us
ne to report a magazine
delivery problem.
Thanks for letting me know so promptly.
Regards,
John Gilpin
QUANTA Membership Secretary.
- Original Message -
From: "John Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "QLUsers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 20
F.A.O. John Gilpin
The magazine is still going to my old address and you claimed to have
altered it.
John Taylor.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
53 matches
Mail list logo
