> When spamassassin is enabled but maildrop is not I see failed assertions in
> dovecots POP server[2], which are caused by vdelivermail using a wrong
> filename. The filename, more exactly the S= value is calculated
> _before_ the mail is piped into spamassassin, which adds two more header
> lines
What is the os Federico
Contattano off line ciao
Remo
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno Sep 6, 2009, alle ore 14:15, "Federico Santulli" > ha scritto:
dmesg shows this:
vdelivermail[17906]: segfault at 20 ip 00411311 sp
7fffc3f1c290 error 4 in vdelivermail[40+19000]
is there an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Cole wrote:
> CFLAGS=-Os -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
Remove these CFLAGS and try again. Let me know how it goes. I can't reproduce
this issue unfortunately.
If you can, and would like to contact me off-list to give me access to the
environmen
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 04:23:48 pm Matt Brookings wrote:
> Steve Cole wrote:
> > Moving to the new vpopmail (with the identical CFLAGS & configure options
> > for 5.4.23 that I've been using for a long time), I get:
>
> What CFLAGS and configure options are you using?
./configure --enable-valia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Cole wrote:
> Moving to the new vpopmail (with the identical CFLAGS & configure options for
> 5.4.23 that I've been using for a long time), I get:
What CFLAGS and configure options are you using?
- --
/*
Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 06:01 -0700, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
> > What I'm trying to work around with this method is to handle
> > user-specific .qmail directives. Dovecot doesn't do that, and that is
> > why I can't full out replace vdelivermail with deli
On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
What I'm trying to work around with this method is to handle
user-specific .qmail directives. Dovecot doesn't do that, and that is
why I can't full out replace vdelivermail with deliver.
What if vpopmail was updated to store a user's .qmail file
You're right, sorry. I misunderstood where you were trying to do this.
t.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Romero [mailto:r...@havokmon.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:28 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Romero wrote:
> vdelivermail already has a 'run_command' function for running .qmail
> commands, I'm going to try using that next to call deliver. That should
> solve the chained pipe issue.
I'll admit that I'm not very familiar with the issues
sue). Maildrop can be
> setup to handle any circumstance you have to deal with and just defer
> delivery until the problem is resolved without causing mail loss.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Tren
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rick Romero [mailto:r...@havokmon.com]
>
le any circumstance you have to deal with and just defer delivery until the
problem is resolved without causing mail loss.
Hope that helps,
Tren
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Romero [mailto:r...@havokmon.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:32 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.c
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
>
>> Programming question - if I write to fd0 (STDOUT), and then exec() a
>> process, will that child process see the data I put in fd0 from the parent?
>> Maybe I'll just try that as
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
> Programming question - if I write to fd0 (STDOUT), and then exec() a
> process, will that child process see the data I put in fd0 from the parent?
> Maybe I'll just try that as well.
>
make fd0 a file (using makeseekable) and do lseek (0, 0
erfectly.
>
> I'm not sure if this method would be worth doing in the case of dovecot, but
> it helped me get around some of the same issues with dSPAM, and ensure that
> mail was never lost.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tren
>
> > -Original Message-
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Cleaver, Japheth [mailto:jclea...@soe.sony.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:16 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deliver
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Tren Blackburn [mailto:t...@eotnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:55 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deliver
>
> I have a question about this. When I first implemented dS
]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:37 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deliver
>
>
> Ok. This won't work. My test system had all the variables set in the
> shell, which is why it worked. :( The reason it won't work
Ok. This won't work. My test system had all the variables set in the
shell, which is why it worked. :( The reason it won't work is that
qmail-local is the parent process of both vdelivermail AND deliver.
If vdelivermail sets HOME, it does not apply to deliver's environment.
:(
On t
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 5:31 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail delete for the win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Goodman wrote:
> I wish someone had told me about that earlier. What a great tool for
> reducing unnec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Goodman wrote:
> I wish someone had told me about that earlier. What a great tool for
> reducing unnecessary load.
An ever better tool is the chkuser patch and vdelivermail set to bounce so
the message never even reaches qmail-queue.
- --
/*
Hi
I am about to install John M. Simpsons suite of patches around
validrcptto.cdb, see:
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml
The "onchange" patch, see:
http://qmail.jms1.net/vpopmail/
In order to only recieve mail, on my system, for which I have a valid
recipient.
Allan D
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 09:42 +0200, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
> Rick
>
> Inserting maildrop into .qmail-default is a fine implementation solution
> but this patch provide thoses advantages :
>
> - Maildrop handle correctly the maildir quota (and in you mailfilter
> sample you should handle
Rick
Inserting maildrop into .qmail-default is a fine implementation solution
but this patch provide thoses advantages :
- Maildrop handle correctly the maildir quota (and in you mailfilter
sample you should handle the exit codde 77). But for example, this
configuration will nevers bounce
that's what i was thinking- at some point in the future, somebody (maybe
myself, if i ever get some free time) (yeah, right) will want to write a
web interface which gives individual mailbox owners the ability to
either edit their own .mailfilter file, or choose from a list of options
which w
On 2006-10-26, at 1251, Rick Romero wrote:
I don't know what everyone else is doing, but my .qmail-default looks
like this:
|maildrop /home/vpopmail/domains/havokmon.com/mailfilter
| /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail
'' /usr/home/vpopmail/domains/havokmon.com/rick
And my mailfiler is essenti
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:39 -0400, John Simpson wrote:
> On 2006-10-26, at 0359, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
> > John Simpson a écrit :
> >>
> >> also, what if a user (i.e. the owner of one specific mailbox)
> >> wants to create their own .mailfilter file, either directly or
> >> using some k
On 2006-10-26, at 0359, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
John Simpson a écrit :
also, what if a user (i.e. the owner of one specific mailbox)
wants to create their own .mailfilter file, either directly or
using some kind of web interface which gives them a set of options
and writes a .mailfi
On Oct 25, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
You'll find our patch below, if it can help someone ...
I'll put it in my personal patch queue for inclusion in a future release
of vpopmail, but since I don't use maildrop, I may not include it unless
others tell me it's worth add
John Simpson a écrit :
what if there happens to be a mailbox with the name "mailfilter"? (yes,
it's a rather contrived example, but you see some really weird stuff
when you run an ISP... as an example, we had one user who ran one of the
local post offices and wanted "postmaster" as his user
On 2006-10-25, at 1152, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
It also has the granularity of a using a mailfilter configuration
file for domains (ie /home/vpopmail/domains/onedomain/mailfilter),
all domains (ie /home/vpopmail/domains/mailfilter) … and indeed a
default one in /etc/mailfilter.
wha
On Oct 25, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote:
You'll find our patch below, if it can help someone ...
I'll put it in my personal patch queue for inclusion in a future
release of vpopmail, but since I don't use maildrop, I may not
include it unless others tell me it's worth addi
>>> On May 9, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
the problem is that vpopmail is using qmail-inject to forward
messages.
qmail-inject does not tolerate malformed messages.
it's that simple.
>>>
>>> Any volunteers to review the code in vdelivermail.c and modify it to
>
>> On May 9, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>>> the problem is that vpopmail is using qmail-inject to forward messages.
>>> qmail-inject does not tolerate malformed messages.
>>>
>>> it's that simple.
>>
>> Any volunteers to review the code in vdelivermail.c and modify it to
>> use qmail-
On Oct 1, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Brian Downey wrote:
The bounce-no-mailbox works when junk heads to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', but when adding a dash extension onto
any /existing/ address, such as [EMAIL PROTECTED],
it gets delivered. Even while the address does not specifically exist
in the database o
On Apr 13, 2005, at 4:41 AM, John Chess wrote:
I misspoke when I said that vdelivermail was walking the entire user
directory. What I meant to say is that it was walking the entire
_domain_ directory, looking in each user's directory. I'm still
puzzled by this. Do you think domain quotas are causin
On 4/12/05, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:59 AM, John Chess wrote:
> > Running lsof on the nfs mount, it looks like vdelivermail is walking
> > the entire user directory tree on the nfs server. After sending a test
> > mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], an lsof shows:
>
>
On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:59 AM, John Chess wrote:
Running lsof on the nfs mount, it looks like vdelivermail is walking
the entire user directory tree on the nfs server. After sending a test
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], an lsof shows:
You probably have domain quotas enabled, and it's checking usage. If
On Apr 7, 2005, at 6:40 AM, Mario Cardia wrote:
the problem is that i have many .qmail-user files that redirect mail
with
vdeliver mail, exemple:
| /opt/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' /opt/vpopmail/domains/test.com/user
It works fine in old mail server but in the new one it fails.
vdelivermail shoul
mario,
you did changed the location of vpopmail but copied the old domains/
directory, right?
if so, you must change many things,
firstly, check if the vpopmail user and vchkpw group have same id's in
/etc/passwd. if so, you can go on w/o reinstall
secondly, you must check out the qmail's assing
41 2141-1800
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail and overquota catchalls
On Feb 4, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Juliano Simões wrote:
> However, if the message is sen
On Feb 4, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Juliano Simões wrote:
However, if the message is sent to a non-existent account
of a domain with an over quota catchall, the message gets
delivered.
Is there a way to enforce the quota limit in this case?
I have an updated vdelivermail that corrects this problem. I hav
> The hardware is a Compaq Prolian 7000 whith 1.5 gb RAM and RAID 5 storage
> (100
> gb). There are 2 partition (both ext3) / and /var. qmail and vpopmail are
> installed in /var.
>
> The mail server has about 200 hosted domain but only one is big.
>
> This one has about 20k mail accounts.
Aha! Pr
On Dec 3, 2004, at 7:24 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
I don't know. I've only started to look into the mail quota code.
I may pull fresh code from the most recent Courier-IMAP (original
source of most of the code) and make sure that I spend as little time
with the file open as necessary. I think that
On Dec 3, 2004, at 3:01 PM, shadowplay.net wrote:
does this change take into account the ablity for multi processing on
the maildirsize
and 2 vdeliverers attempting to add to the mailbox at near
simultaneous time...
think multiple mailservers with a nfs connection to the
maildirectories...
Title: Message
does
this change take into account the ablity for multi processing on the maildirsize
and 2
vdeliverers attempting to add to the mailbox at near simultaneous time...
think
multiple mailservers with a nfs connection to the maildirectories...
ie at
this time if i accept
[intentionaly top posted]
You are my new hero Mr. Collins.
If you are in or near central Indiana, my wife makes apple pie and
vegetable soup that grown men will crawl through broken glass for, there
are a few servings waiting for you.
Can't wait to give it a try.
DAve
Tom Collins wrote:
I've und
; >
> > > -Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:12 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Vdelivermail high load
> > >
> > >
> > &
; BSD USER BSD050945
> ICQ 72293951
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:12 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Vdelivermail high load
> >
> >
> >
hanks.
___
ALMEIDA, Fernando Costa de
Computeasy Informática
www.computeasy.com.br
BSD USER BSD050945
ICQ 72293951
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Vd
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 09:47 am, Fernando Costa de Almeida wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, when issuing a top on my pop server, I noticed that there were
> some vdelivermails process eating a lot of cpu resources. Then, looking
> in the logs files, I saw that it was a spam to a specific domain, and
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 19:20, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
> > I will try this, but could you elaborate on why that is/would cause
> > this? Is this 'by design' for a setup with domain limits turned on?
>
> It's a poor design that requires vdelivermail to tra
On Jun 29, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
I will try this, but could you elaborate on why that is/would cause
this? Is this 'by design' for a setup with domain limits turned on?
It's a poor design that requires vdelivermail to traverse the entire
domain to determine whether it's over quota o
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 19:06, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
> > However, when I then send a mail to any user (doesn't matter which)
> > qmail-local kicks off the delivery process and it takes a LONG time and
> > there is LOTS of disk access. By using the lsof c
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
However, when I then send a mail to any user (doesn't matter which)
qmail-local kicks off the delivery process and it takes a LONG time and
there is LOTS of disk access. By using the lsof command i was able to
see what files vdelivermail had open, and
Nevermind it was a corrupt build. Interesting thing was that I rebuilt
it... twice... and still had problems. I finally got the idea to copy
the vdelivermail executable from a machine with the same arch. Problem
solved.
Rod K wrote:
I have Vpopmail 5.4.0 installed on a FreeBSD 4.9 system.
W
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does vdelivermail mail have a "drop-no-mailbox" option?
Replace "drop-no-mailbox" with "delete"
Rick
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 09:29 am, Brian wrote:
[snip bunch of vdelivermail's fighting for cpu]
> This is a snapshot from top as I'm trying to send an email to a local
> ezmlm list that goes to about 50 local people.
do all of those users have lots and lots of mail in their accounts, and you're
Brian wrote:
Hello All,
I'm at a loss and all I can come up with is this:
last pid: 70373; load averages: 4.32, 3.48, 3.53
up 33+19:31:48 09:32:36
148 processes: 26 running, 122 sleeping
CPU states: 5.6% user, 0.0% nice, 94.0% system, 0.2% interrupt, 0.2%
idle
Mem: 125M Active, 262M
Hi Anders,
thanks for that hint, I think I´ll give it a try next weekend.
To be honest, what I´ve done to get rid of that problem is let qmail do the whole
stuff with interpreting the EXITCODE from my spamfilter script.
Instead of putting the .qmail file in
/path-to-vpopmail/domains/domain1/ema
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So I upgraded to the last "stable" version 5.2.1 whereas the
> changelog said that within 5.2.1 the EXITCODE checks would be
> performed.
Vpopmail 5.2.1 fails to catch exitcode 100. Here is a patch:
http://fmail.dk/stuff/vpopmail-5.2.1-v
Something to look at:
it seems to stand out in my memory as ive had this same problem, but i dont
recall a resolve for it..
basically if you are having the same problem i was, then you cannot have
anything in your .qmail processing fork..
it must continue to run in the foreground or the mail will
even done
some deeper analyzing of the problem...
=d0Mi=
> Original Message -
> Date: 4-Apr-2003 22:25:50 +0200
> From: Chris Manjoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail and bounced messages
>
> ok bounces
ok bounces the the default postmaster when the sender is bogus so it
doesn't send twice.
So I guess my problem is how do I get those bounces to goto the virtual
email postmaster and not the default mail server postmaster?
At 05:00 PM 4/4/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 08:3
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 08:35:19 -0600 Chris Manjoine wrote:
> When mail gets sent to a user that does not exist it gets bounced to
> the user and to the default postmaster not of the domain but for the
> email server.
> my .qmail.default file says
> | /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '
hi
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Nieder wrote:
> when I noticed, and looked up the mailing list archive for a solution I
> found only messages saying, that it has to be this way. Not beeing
well, i'm no-way convinced by this as well. imho this breaks a lot of
stuff. (Serial
Hi,
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when I noticed, and looked up the mailing list archive for a solution I
found only messages saying, that it has to be this way. Not beeing
convinced myself I modified vdelivermail for me. This should be the
needed patch against vpopmail 5.2.1:
--- vdeliverm
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 08:07 AM, Dzuy Nguyen wrote:
Bill, the message above was unrelated to this problem. I was looking
for
ways to make alias user to get the spam checking. I didn't say it was
a bug.
BTW, I still have not found a suitable solution for
qmail/vpopmail/spamassassi
Bill Shupp wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 08:50 AM, Dzuy Nguyen wrote:
Juraj Hantak wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with vdelivermail it is not correctly proceeding
.qmail- files.
Imagine situation you have a domain called test.com. Do you want to
forward the whole domain @test.com i
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 08:50 AM, Dzuy Nguyen wrote:
Juraj Hantak wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with vdelivermail it is not correctly proceeding
.qmail- files.
Imagine situation you have a domain called test.com. Do you want to
forward the whole domain @test.com into address
[EMAIL PR
Juraj Hantak wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with vdelivermail it is not correctly proceeding
.qmail- files.
Imagine situation you have a domain called test.com. Do you want to
forward the whole domain @test.com into address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the address should be proceed acording its .qmail
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:28 AM, Anders Brander wrote:
Hi,
I think i've encountered a bug, vdelivermail seems to process the line:
"|/do/deliver/to /home/vpopmail/domains/example.com/test1/Maildir/"
wrongly. It deals with it like it's a /Maildir/-line, which is wrong.
It seems like
71 matches
Mail list logo
