RE: New year, no contract
Misguided and arrogant, as the service actually costs you nothing. It costs me nothing, it costs the employers a substantial commission, which can be better used on the systems they run. You fail to explain how you feel entitled to spam this list, particularly in light of your recent activities. You seem to be suggesting that I have done something wrong by operating ORB UK. Could you explain what? Moreover, on the one occasion I was aware of there being issues discussed on this list, the author of the RFC in question appeared to support my interpretation and implementation of the rfc-ignorant portion of the ORB UK listing. Perhaps you think he is also wrong? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
The chosen hourly rate is laughable - even in the current economy, if I was interviewing someone and they pitched themselves that low, I'd laugh them out of the building. Particularly with Dr. and Internet Engineer type declarations. In which country? That is a fair rate in the UK. It may be low in the US, but, last time I looked, Basingstoke, UK was not in the US. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems Logging on to domain.
We have our network subnetted that way to provide two broadcast doamins of 1022 hosts each. This is not an improper method of subneting for two networks. We just use large networks. This best suites our organizational needs and has worked for over five years. The problem regarding our NT authentication is new and I suspect it is being caused by a third party on our network. Possibly someone running some services they shouldn't be. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Logging on to domain. This is an improper subnet for only 2 networks. Your using a class B network and 6 bits from the third octet (252). This would yield 62 subnets with 1022 hosts per subnet and a range of 4. (Check my math everyone). Why not just close off all the bits for each subnet. Example: 172.22.64.0 255.255.255.0 and 172.22.32.0 255.255.255.0 This gives you two networks of 254 hosts each. -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Problems Logging on to domain. I'm having some serious problems with my NT domain, have exhausted all my resources, and don't know where else to look... any help would be appreciated. Symptoms: My windows 98 clients on a different subnet are unable to log on to the domain. (they are on the 172.22.64.0/255.255.252.0 subnet) My domain controllers and WINS servers are on the 172.22.32.0/255.255.252.0. When anyone tries to log in they get a message saying that The domain password you supplied is not correct or access to your logon server has been denied. However, when I use the same credentials on the 172.22.32.0/255.255.252.0 subnet, I can log in with no problems. The computers on the 172.22.64.0/255.255.252.0 subnet can log in to another domain which has it's domain controllers on that subnet. I've also noticed that the problem computers (the one's on the 172.22.64.0/255.255.252.0 subnet) can not use WINS to look up the PDC (strange), but can ping it's IP and use DNS to resolve it's name. However, this doesn't seem to affect all computers on that subnet... At this point I'm at my wits end... :( System Info: All workstations thus far have been Win98 All of my domain controllers are NT 4 running SP5 or higher... Event logs for DC's show no failed or successfull log on attempts for any of the users that are trying to log in from the affected workstations. All workstations can use TCP/IP fine, but have problems when trying to use netbios to contact my PDC. This worked until last week sometime with no problems, the only thing that's changed is that the PDC was on ATM with only one elan and is now on Ethernet (Shouldn't have made any differance, they are essentially the same thing). Thanks, John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailbox not creating
I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possible to change
Hello I have got an Exchange 2000 server serving multiple email domains. When the server creates NDR's, error reports or other system information, it uses the actual Windows 2000 servername in the report. For eksample a NDR would contain the following text: server.nwtraders.internally #5.1.1 Is it possible to change this information? I would like it to say mailsrvr.domain.com instead - without re-installing the server of cause... Soren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens their mailbox for the first time or an email is sent to that user. -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
M...exercises in masochism -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Kumindra, I respectfully disagree. Martin is correct on this one. The LAST thing you want is people on the dev team moving boxes back and forth between a dev network and a prod network. That is definitely a recipe for disaster. In a large environment, the dev people rarely, if ever, are responsible for supporting anything in the production environment. You want one group that is responsible for this type of work, and a change management system that requires approvals before machines are put on the prod network. Doing it any other way in a large environment is an exercise in masochism. Even with a CM process in place, you are bound to get screwed from time to time, but it does minimize the occurrences. I can't even imagine the nightmare you would have if there were three test networks and everyone had free reign to move boxes from those test networks to the prod network. You might as well say you have four test networks. You would rarely have a clue what broke or who did it. The only thing you could be sure of in the environment you describe is everything being screwed up and anyone with a brain shopping their resume. My $.02 Tom. -Original Message- From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I disagree with this, Specially y if you have a Development team. We used to have a separate Development domain, (infact 2 or 3 of them) We may be setting up and removing domain servers in regular basis, for various RD and Development related work. What one Can do is to physically move those computers out of the main network, But then people might have communication problems. I don't have much Of experience in how to manage such installations, but We some how managed with a little bit of extra discipline from the Developers side. Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 December 2001 21:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? So it really isn't a matter of too much work, but rather a matter of poor management. In any company, but in particular one your size, allowing departments to manage computers is a recipe for disaster. It probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but not any longer. There should be a central point of contact for all machines. Orders are placed through that group and delivered to them for configuration and delivery to the end users or departments. That way all hardware is fully tracked and managed. You should be using logon scripts as one method of pushing out AV installs and DAT updates. That way for someone to login, AV software has to be installed. I would suggest rather than spend 50-60K a year for an AV tech, that you put that time / money into better management. Ill bet you if you went to upper management and said OK, we need a new hardware procedure, OR we need to spend 60K a year for an AV guy, they would let you have your way -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original
RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
But it was on clearance! We thought we were getting a good deal! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. That's what you get for buying your hardware at KMart. (c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I(r) Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. We have a set of 18 production servers that are specifically designed to crash utterly and completely every 3-4 months. These are multi-purpose servers so I get to DR Exchange on the average 3-5 times every time a total crash occurs because some bozo touches the server after I do. Therefore I really don't need to perform DR tests. Why do it in the lab when you do it regularly in production. S. PS: There is no sarcasm or exaggeration in this e-mail. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having to do more next year and the years to come. :o) D A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment this year? [1] Frightfully few I'm afraid. For those who know they didn't test as much as they should, perhaps a new year resolution (and plan to achieve same) is in order. Join me now in scheduling your disaster recovery testing for the new year. Here are the dates I'll be testing my recovery scenarios [3]. Friday, March 29 Friday, May 31 Friday, July 26 Friday, October 25 Reminders set a week in advance. Time blocked out to allow sufficient time to complete the task. First test scheduled late enough in the new year to allow for acquisition of additional hardware and development of test plan if needed. Schedule the time now or you'll never find the time. As an Exchange sage once noted, the wrong time to be practicing your disaster recovery plan is in the middle of a disaster. Do yourself, your employer and the rest of the community a favor and schedule your practice sessions now. [1] Rhetorical question. [2] [2] Definition for Amit Hanji: rhetorical question n. A question to which no answer is expected, often used for rhetorical effect. [3] In my lab anyway. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
Actually the real problem with those boxes is that they are less powerful than my laptop and run every BackOffice application you can think of, all NT services (DNS, DHCP etc), run TWO virus scanners AND serve as domain controllers. It's like using a dodge neon to haul a freight train. S. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. That's what you get for buying your hardware at KMart. (c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I(r) Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. We have a set of 18 production servers that are specifically designed to crash utterly and completely every 3-4 months. These are multi-purpose servers so I get to DR Exchange on the average 3-5 times every time a total crash occurs because some bozo touches the server after I do. Therefore I really don't need to perform DR tests. Why do it in the lab when you do it regularly in production. S. PS: There is no sarcasm or exaggeration in this e-mail. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having to do more next year and the years to come. :o) D A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster recovery planning for the new year. How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment this year? [1] Frightfully few I'm afraid. For those who know they didn't test as much as they should, perhaps a new year resolution (and plan to achieve same) is in order. Join me now in scheduling your disaster recovery testing for the new year. Here are the dates I'll be testing my recovery scenarios [3]. Friday, March 29 Friday, May 31 Friday, July 26 Friday, October 25 Reminders set a week in advance. Time blocked out to allow sufficient time to complete the task. First test scheduled late enough in the new year to allow for acquisition of additional hardware and development of test plan if needed. Schedule the time now or you'll never find the time. As an Exchange sage once noted, the wrong time to be practicing your disaster recovery plan is in the middle of a disaster. Do yourself, your employer and the rest of the community a favor and schedule your practice sessions now. [1] Rhetorical question. [2] [2] Definition for Amit Hanji: rhetorical question n. A question to which no answer is expected, often used for rhetorical effect. [3] In my lab anyway. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving mailboxes
Same server? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving mailboxes No we are not using exmerge? What is that and how will that help us? Does the server has to be down to run exmerge? Where do I find that utility documented? In the beginning someone built multiple containers under the receipts container. Now when we try disaster recovery we cannot successfully complete that task.. We are trying to move all mailboxes in one container. Thanks for your help. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving mailboxes Are you using Exmerge to do this? What do you mean from one container to another??? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving mailboxes Good afternoon, Exchange 5.5 sp4 and Outlook 98. When moving mailboxes from one container to another is it true that a person's profile has to be refreshed by doing a check name after keying in the mailbox name? I have been testing this and find that it is true. We have 1638 mailboxes to move from one container to another. We are doing the following: back up the mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox, add the mailbox to the correct container, restore the mailbox from the PST. Then when trying to sign in we get unable to open default folders. I thought it might be a timing (synching problem) so I wanted 20 hours and still get the same error. Please let me know if you know of an easier way to move these mailboxes. (I know Kevin Snook company has mailbox mover but that is one at a time also and we really haven't got that to work either.) Happy holidays. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Turn on the television and see whats happened - 9-11-2001 John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 Dear DL Members, What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Year 2001? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
We're not right now (hopefully never!) but we still have to geared up to accept and deal with it. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract A Euro (sp?) is running about 88 cents U.S. Besides, I thought the UK wasn't going to implement the Euro. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract £25/hour is about US$37.50/hour. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New year, no contract 25/per hour??? Beer must be really cheap there too. - Original Message - From: Paul Cummins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: OT: New year, no contract Hi folks... Off topic for the list, but what the hell, it's christmas. Since ORB UK is now closed pending the creation of Horus, that means I'm out of contract now. I'm 30, been using MS since before they bought DOS, and I'm a Microsoft Partner in my own right. I have experience in Windows from 3.1 to ME, OS/2 and NT from 2.1 to XP, DOS'en from 3.3 to 7.1, and Linux. I also use BeOS, MacOS X, FreeBSD and SVR4. My current 'learning experience' is QNX. I have experience of Sendmail, QMail, Exim, Exchange 5 and 5.5, and Mailtraq, and have used SPTM, POP3, APOP, ETRN and ODMR. I've been doing telephone and deskside support for the better end of 4 years, and was part of the support team during the launch of Telewest SurfUnlimited. I've used and supported ISDN, ADSL, and Cable Modems, as well as Leased Line, Routed Solutions and Plain Old dial-up. Sad though I am, I can identify a modem model and a RAS by ear. With Lucent Portmasters, I can even tell the ComOs release by listening to it. I'm based in Basingstoke, UK, but don't mind commuting, consulting, homeworking, Remote Adminning, or even travelling if the price is right. I'll do Contract or Permanent, and would be looking for ?25 per hour for Contract or ?35,000 per annum for permanent. If you want more info, or a CV, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many thanks all. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS __ __ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
home server?
Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
And addresses don't appear until after the RUS has applied the recipient policy. If you wait 15 minutes does the account get an address? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens their mailbox for the first time or an email is sent to that user. -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Ok cool, thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Chris, I would agree with you but saying Exch2k resides on a BDC. Sounds like a configuration issue unless that was a freudian slip. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating And addresses don't appear until after the RUS has applied the recipient policy. If you wait 15 minutes does the account get an address? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens their mailbox for the first time or an email is sent to that user. -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCanmail and MTA
Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
I think it really depends on the organization in question. Certainly if I were Sprint or BT I wouldn't have Exchange on a DC, but for other organizations it might be appropriate. Certainly if I had my druthers, I'd not have my FSMO roles handled by the same server... Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
If you have any questions at all, don't remove the server YET. Just turn it off. Watch event logs and listen to users. You should know in a few days if everything is kosher. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Ok cool, thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Oh absolutely. I wont reassign the server for months. Watch and wait. e- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? If you have any questions at all, don't remove the server YET. Just turn it off. Watch event logs and listen to users. You should know in a few days if everything is kosher. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Ok cool, thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Just stop the Exchange services on it. You don't have to wait for months! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Oh absolutely. I wont reassign the server for months. Watch and wait. e- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? If you have any questions at all, don't remove the server YET. Just turn it off. Watch event logs and listen to users. You should know in a few days if everything is kosher. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Ok cool, thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
And watch my phone turn into a xmas tree. :) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Just stop the Exchange services on it. You don't have to wait for months! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Oh absolutely. I wont reassign the server for months. Watch and wait. e- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? If you have any questions at all, don't remove the server YET. Just turn it off. Watch event logs and listen to users. You should know in a few days if everything is kosher. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Ok cool, thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
mm loose goose... -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Sorry about that Martin...should have given credit where it is due :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 ::Taking a bow:: -Original Message- From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 You should get the enterprise version. It supports saucer separation! -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001 Dear DL Members, What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Year 2001? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Have you checked to make sure the software is functioning properly? Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Your English? I just thought you typed funny...hmmm -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Oops, spelling retardYOU'RE -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Your English? I just thought you typed funny...hmmm -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
A Euro (sp?) is running about 88 cents U.S. Besides, I thought the UK wasn't going to implement the Euro. Look at the email address. I run my Income in Ireland and France. Anyway, if I can accept them, I may as well do so, my local Tesco's and Walmart do too. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. That's a matter of opinion, of course. Your post is nothing but spam. I disagree. My posting is off-topic, but not spam. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current server HP LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one another box to off load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC controller and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA and SSL on to the other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable Front/Back end then? Also they may throw in another 512MB and another processor to the original server. Any comments appreciated. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL email? Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
I would characterize it as meeting the triple criteria: 1. unsolicited -- We didn't ask for it and many of us find it annoying to boot. 2. commerical -- You are explicitly selling yourself (who are you to call others pimps?!). 3. e-mail Hence your post qualifies as Spam. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Cummins Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. That's a matter of opinion, of course. Your post is nothing but spam. I disagree. My posting is off-topic, but not spam. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Does 3.52 have the option to disable the avapi? I could see the mapi scanning alone failing under DL load. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL email? Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
I would characterize it as meeting the triple criteria: 1. unsolicited -- We didn't ask for it and many of us find it annoying to boot. 2. commerical -- You are explicitly selling yourself (who are you to call others pimps?!). 3. e-mail Hence your post qualifies as Spam. Ah well... someone needs to report me to my provider then. In the meantime, if this list is so petty that people can't help their peers, then I'm not sure I want to be here. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your recommendations anyway. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current server HP LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one another box to off load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC controller and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA and SSL on to the other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable Front/Back end then? Also they may throw in another 512MB and another processor to the original server. Any comments appreciated. _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Yes, it does. I just unchecked it. The DL was our Global DL, that has all 600 employees in it. Probably gave scanmail a sucker punch. :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Does 3.52 have the option to disable the avapi? I could see the mapi scanning alone failing under DL load. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL email? Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Don't turn off AVAPI, or you will really be screwed the next time that happens. PERSONALLY, I would use AVAPI, MAPI, and Message Body Scanning, along with Ext blocking. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Yes, it does. I just unchecked it. The DL was our Global DL, that has all 600 employees in it. Probably gave scanmail a sucker punch. :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Does 3.52 have the option to disable the avapi? I could see the mapi scanning alone failing under DL load. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL email? Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
That, of course, is entirely your choice. Speaking for myself, I wasn't really peeved from your plea for help since I was blissfully unaware of your history. I am, however, more annoyed by your insistence on rebutting every single point whether or not your arguments have any logical or factual merit. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Cummins Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I would characterize it as meeting the triple criteria: 1. unsolicited -- We didn't ask for it and many of us find it annoying to boot. 2. commerical -- You are explicitly selling yourself (who are you to call others pimps?!). 3. e-mail Hence your post qualifies as Spam. Ah well... someone needs to report me to my provider then. In the meantime, if this list is so petty that people can't help their peers, then I'm not sure I want to be here. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have any experience with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4 weeks project is on it's 5th month. At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your recommendations anyway. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current server HP LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one another box to off load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC controller and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA and SSL on to the other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable Front/Back end then? Also they may throw in another 512MB and another processor to the original server. Any comments appreciated. _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
My wife works for a school district. Her email hasn't worked for 3 months. I have even offered to fix it for the whole district for free, just so I can email her. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have any experience with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4 weeks project is on it's 5th month. At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your recommendations anyway. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current server HP LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one another box to off load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC controller and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA and SSL on to the other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable Front/Back end then? Also they may throw in another 512MB and another processor to the original server. Any comments appreciated. _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
I imagine some are better than others. My experience is that it doesn't matter so much as to what the organization is as it is whether the people involved know as much as they think they do. The least informed customers can sometimes be the best customers if they know enough to get out of the way! Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have any experience with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4 weeks project is on it's 5th month. At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your recommendations anyway. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current server HP LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one another box to off load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC controller and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA and SSL on to the other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable Front/Back end then? Also they may throw in another 512MB and another processor to the original server. Any comments appreciated. _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
Their current system is Eudora (2.) something. The toughest part was getting all the user/group info over. There is no direct migration method. Had to use an import tool from Tools4ever.com to import passwords along with all other info. Worked like a charm. Neat tool. Could have used resource kit utilities but the tool was the only one I could find 2 months ago that would allow import of passwords into 2K. Well it's time to go. Have a Happy New Year all. My wife works for a school district. Her email hasn't worked for 3 months. I have even offered to fix it for the whole district for free, just so I can email her. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have any experience with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4 weeks project is on it's 5th month. At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your recommendations anyway. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current server HP LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one another box to off load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC controller and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA and SSL on to the other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable Front/Back end then? Also they may throw in another 512MB and another processor to the original server. Any comments appreciated. _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3
I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Ed, I would agree with you in principle. But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small Business Server. They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is cheap, philosophy. The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford the infrastructure and we have seen the results and to be honest; some work and some don't!. Few thoughts and its back to the horses for courses scenario. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Re: Exchange and Intranet
LDAP. At my last job, we did an HTML page that searched the LDAP database and posted the info in a table. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Morgan, Joshua | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/27/2001 04:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Exchange and Intranet | | I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
I never talk about SBS. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Ed, I would agree with you in principle. But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small Business Server. They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is cheap, philosophy. The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford the infrastructure and we have seen the results and to be honest; some work and some don't!. Few thoughts and its back to the horses for courses scenario. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: mailbox not creating
I never talk about the Special Boat Service either Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating I never talk about SBS. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Ed, I would agree with you in principle. But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small Business Server. They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is cheap, philosophy. The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford the infrastructure and we have seen the results and to be honest; some work and some don't!. Few thoughts and its back to the horses for courses scenario. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Rachel, From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: home server?
There is a KB article on removing the first server in the site. Read it and follow it. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3
I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Unless you configured a specific DL expansion server, you shouldn't have an issue with DLs. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Stolen? Share this story!! -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3
Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Thats interesting Gary - I'm in Crawley as well! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Office break-in. they had everthing away, PC's, server, even the dishwasher and the kettle! This was the last site that I had added to the WAN and ironically - feeding into the present discussions, it was a NT4 BDC with Ex5.5! PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 18:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Stolen? Share this story!! -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3
O.K I see where you are going. Does IMAP use the same type authentication as POP3? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
A couple of holes? Why not just the one needed? IMAP: POP done right. - Paul Robichaux -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
Sorry, wasn't thinking... 993 -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 A couple of holes? Why not just the one needed? IMAP: POP done right. - Paul Robichaux -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I agree with Tom. We've been using NAV corporate (NAV for Gateways, NAV Exchange and NAV on the desktops) for a year and have no, none, nada, zippo outbreaks. It's performed flawlessy through bombardment of the many viruses of 2001. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3
And then SSL SMTP for outbound (to allow for forced authentication)? I'm going through the same thing right now trying to beef up security while moving some servers. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 Hmmm, I don't know. But if you used IMAP with SSL, it would be encrypted, so that wouldn't really be an issue anymore. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 O.K I see where you are going. Does IMAP use the same type authentication as POP3? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: POP3
Use OWA w. SSL and forget everything else. -Original Message- From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 And then SSL SMTP for outbound (to allow for forced authentication)? I'm going through the same thing right now trying to beef up security while moving some servers. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 Hmmm, I don't know. But if you used IMAP with SSL, it would be encrypted, so that wouldn't really be an issue anymore. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 O.K I see where you are going. Does IMAP use the same type authentication as POP3? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something. IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail clients. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth reading that you know about -John Q - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: RE: POP3 How about use IMAP and SSL? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible. I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that w/ OWA and POP3. But that is still a security risk. -John Q P.S. The only reason I ask is that this customer stated that his friend has 2 EX5.5 boxes and one is for mail relay and the other stores the mail and he has users access POP3 from the other server, I was trying to provide a better solution - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: POP3 Huh??? BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle mailboxes. Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have? -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them use the server that stores the mail. The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but do not know how to setup POP3 other than using the EX5.5 server w/ the mailboxes on it. Any ideas or reading you can point me toward? Thnaks, -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
Re: home server?
The last one in the site as in the last one installed into the site has no significance. The last one in the site as in there are no other servers in the site makes it special. - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:18 PM Subject: RE: home server? Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
Ill take Vegas! Pretty much anywhere but Los Angles -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
2½ months behind in your reading, William? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
He'll get to the Top Ten of 2001 in March... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year 2½ months behind in your reading, William? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC next year
I coulda sent Test ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year 2½ months behind in your reading, William? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC next year I concur. ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC next year But it's only 50 degrees these days in Chicago... I prefer Las Vegas... Jake - Original Message - From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC next year Chicago has obviously been hugely overlooked. It must be a conspiracy. Drew _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mad at My Exchange Server
You could delete mad.exe... William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mad at My Exchange Server I cannot find where my users deleted items are and it still shows that there is 256,000 k in the Private information store under the deleted items K column. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
How would one know? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange and Intranet
I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Intranet
Upgrade to win2k and use AD. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and Intranet I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Video tape and fuji film. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract How would one know? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
