RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Erik Sojka

They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of the acorns,
then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck...

 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM
 To: Baker, Jennifer
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Grrr... 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Video tape and fuji film.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 How would one know?
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
 Tech Consultant
 Compaq Computer Corporation
 Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
 
 Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
 clarifications: 
 
 (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
 happen to spend
 most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK 
 employment
 situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  
 
 (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
 you'll see that I
 even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added 
 them in below
 again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty 
 folks on this
 list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.
 
 Gary
 
 
 -- 
 Gary K. Slinger
 Manager, Operations Design and Development
 CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
 Tampa, Florida
 US Office: +1-813-635-2189
 UK Office: +44-1293-582778
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 
 Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He doesn't have
 anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to 
 this list. Your
 post is nothing but spam.  
 
 S/
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
  Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
 search sites, 
  or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
 
 I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
 circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
 you, perhaps,
 
 have something to hide?
 
 -- 
 Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
 Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
  |  / \AND POSTINGS
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
 message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  
 If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify 
 Veronis, Suhler 
 Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax 
 (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 ==
 ==
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   

RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Erik Sojka

I might be wrong;  Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing
that christmas song.  You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop?

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women 
 tend to swoon
 over...
 
 PBB
 ~ndi
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of 
 the acorns,
 then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM
  To: Baker, Jennifer
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Grrr... 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Video tape and fuji film.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  How would one know?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
  Tech Consultant
  Compaq Computer Corporation
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
  
  Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
  clarifications: 
  
  (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
  happen to spend
  most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK 
  employment
  situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  
  
  (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
  you'll see that I
  even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added 
  them in below
  again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty 
  folks on this
  list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.
  
  Gary
  
  
  -- 
  Gary K. Slinger
  Manager, Operations Design and Development
  CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
  Tampa, Florida
  US Office: +1-813-635-2189
  UK Office: +44-1293-582778
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  
  Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He 
 doesn't have
  anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to 
  this list. Your
  post is nothing but spam.  
  
  S/
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
   Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
  search sites, 
   or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
  
  I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
  circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
  you, perhaps,
  
  have something to hide?
  
  -- 
  Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
  Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
   |  / \AND POSTINGS
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  --
  --
  --
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
  confidential information intended only for the use of the 
  individual or
  entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
  message is not the
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
  distribution or copy of this 

RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Paul Bouzan

She was perhaps thinking about both - what a mental picture!

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 02 January 2002 13:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


I might be wrong;  Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing
that christmas song.  You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop?

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women 
 tend to swoon
 over...
 
 PBB
 ~ndi
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of 
 the acorns,
 then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM
  To: Baker, Jennifer
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Grrr... 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Video tape and fuji film.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  How would one know?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
  Tech Consultant
  Compaq Computer Corporation
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
  
  Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
  clarifications: 
  
  (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
  happen to spend
  most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK 
  employment
  situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  
  
  (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
  you'll see that I
  even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added 
  them in below
  again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty 
  folks on this
  list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.
  
  Gary
  
  
  -- 
  Gary K. Slinger
  Manager, Operations Design and Development
  CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
  Tampa, Florida
  US Office: +1-813-635-2189
  UK Office: +44-1293-582778
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  
  Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He 
 doesn't have
  anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to 
  this list. Your
  post is nothing but spam.  
  
  S/
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
   Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
  search sites, 
   or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
  
  I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
  circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
  you, perhaps,
  
  have something to hide?
  
  -- 
  Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
  Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
   |  / \AND POSTINGS
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  --
  --
  --
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
  confidential information intended 

Offline Address Book

2002-01-02 Thread Friese, Casey

I'm having a problem with my offline address book only displaying the
contents of one of my sites.  My setup is Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0 SP6a.

I have 12 sites total.  Each site has the global address book slected in DS
Site Configuration, Offline Address Book Tab.

When remote users try to send messages to anyone outside of their home site
they cannot fined the listing for who they want to send to in their book.
When remote users sync they only get their local site's recipients.

The problem was discovered about 2 weeks ago when one of the sites had only
it's recipients container listed in DS Site Configuration, Offline Address
Book tab.  I changed it to Global Address List about a week ago and the
problem is starting back up again.  I have double checked all of the sites
to verify that the GAL is sleceted.

Should I be looking anywhere else?

Thanks for your help.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Client Access

2002-01-02 Thread Roger Seielstad

Especially since the keys don't exist by default

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Client Access
 
 
 That's what I originally thought.  That's something hard 
 coded into the registry and I don't know of too many apps 
 that overwrite manual changes to the registry...
 
 D
 
 
 Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure 
 you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:55 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Client Access
 
 
 I've done plenty of SP upgrades on Exchange and can 
 unequivicably state that it does NOT remove the static port mappings.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 http://www.peregrine.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:47 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Client Access
  
  
  Oh, there you go.  SP4 would have changed things back the 
 WAY they 
  SHOULD be.
  
  D
  
  Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk? -Anon
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Client Access
  
  
  There's you answer.  I think the upgrade to 5.5 SP4 would
  have reset the static RPC ports defined previously.  You 
  can set this back...but, I would not recommend doing so.  
  
  Your best bet is to implement a VPN solution if users wish to
  access the Exchange Server via the Internet using a Mapi 
  based client.
  
  I believe the FAQ has some information on doing this.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:49 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Client Access
  
  
  Sorry for not being clear,
  upgraded  to 5.5 sp4
  patched IIS
  updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches
  
  This is kind of a weird situation, security was not a concern
  of this company until around the last six months. I do want 
  to close the machine off from the internet as much as 
  possible, but I want to know why this isn't working.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Client Access

2002-01-02 Thread Roger Seielstad

He's talking about upgrading IE from 5.0 to 5.5, not Exchange.

For Exchange 5.0 to 5.5, I can't say for sure, since I don't do inplace
upgrades.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:13 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Client Access
 
 
 Maybe so.. But what if you upgrade from 5.0 to 5.5 SP4?  
 Which...by the way, is what seems to be the case here but 
 that part was left out.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Client Access
 
 
 That's what I originally thought.  That's something hard 
 coded into the registry and I don't know of too many apps 
 that overwrite manual changes to the registry...
 
 D
 
 
 Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure 
 you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:55 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Client Access
 
 
 I've done plenty of SP upgrades on Exchange and can 
 unequivicably state that it does NOT remove the static port mappings.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 http://www.peregrine.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:47 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Client Access
  
  
  Oh, there you go.  SP4 would have changed things back the 
 WAY they 
  SHOULD be.
  
  D
  
  Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk? -Anon
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Client Access
  
  
  There's you answer.  I think the upgrade to 5.5 SP4 would
  have reset the static RPC ports defined previously.  You 
  can set this back...but, I would not recommend doing so.  
  
  Your best bet is to implement a VPN solution if users wish to
  access the Exchange Server via the Internet using a Mapi 
  based client.
  
  I believe the FAQ has some information on doing this.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:49 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Client Access
  
  
  Sorry for not being clear,
  upgraded  to 5.5 sp4
  patched IIS
  updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches
  
  This is kind of a weird situation, security was not a concern
  of this company until around the last six months. I do want 
  to close the machine off from the internet as much as 
  possible, but I want to know why this isn't working.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Andy David

m
Oreos...



-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Yes, but what is that in Euros?

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


£25/hour is about US$37.50/hour.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New year, no contract


25/per hour??? Beer must be really cheap there too. 


- Original Message - 
From: Paul Cummins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 3:36 PM
Subject: OT: New year, no contract


 Hi folks...
 
 Off topic for the list, but what the hell, it's christmas.
 
 Since ORB UK is now closed pending the creation of Horus, that means
 I'm out of contract now.
 
 I'm 30, been using MS since before they bought DOS, and I'm a
 Microsoft Partner in my own right.
 
 I have experience in Windows from 3.1 to ME, OS/2 and NT from 2.1 to
 XP, DOS'en from 3.3 to 7.1, and Linux. I also use BeOS, MacOS X, 
 FreeBSD and SVR4. My current 'learning experience' is QNX.
 
 I have experience of Sendmail, QMail, Exim, Exchange 5 and 5.5, and
 Mailtraq, and have used SPTM, POP3, APOP, ETRN and ODMR.
 
 I've been doing telephone and deskside support for the better end of 4

 years, and was part of the support team during the launch of Telewest
 SurfUnlimited. I've used and supported ISDN, ADSL, and Cable Modems, 
 as well as Leased Line, Routed Solutions and Plain Old dial-up. Sad 
 though I am, I can identify a modem model and a RAS by ear. With 
 Lucent Portmasters, I can even tell the ComOs release by listening to 
 it.
 
 I'm based in Basingstoke, UK, but don't mind commuting, consulting,
 homeworking, Remote Adminning, or even travelling if the price is 
 right. I'll do Contract or Permanent, and would be looking for ?25 per

 hour for Contract or ?35,000 per annum for permanent.
 
 If you want more info, or a CV, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Many thanks all.
 
 --
 Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
 Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
  |  / \AND POSTINGS
 
 __
 __
 Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq
(www.mailtraq.com)
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis, Suhler  Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax 
(212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank 
you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Jim Helfer


  The Harmonikats?

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


I might be wrong;  Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing
that christmas song.  You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop?

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women 
 tend to swoon
 over...
 
 PBB
 ~ndi
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of 
 the acorns,
 then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM
  To: Baker, Jennifer
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Grrr... 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Video tape and fuji film.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  How would one know?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
  Tech Consultant
  Compaq Computer Corporation
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
  
  Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
  clarifications: 
  
  (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
  happen to spend
  most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK 
  employment
  situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  
  
  (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
  you'll see that I
  even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added 
  them in below
  again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty 
  folks on this
  list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.
  
  Gary
  
  
  -- 
  Gary K. Slinger
  Manager, Operations Design and Development
  CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
  Tampa, Florida
  US Office: +1-813-635-2189
  UK Office: +44-1293-582778
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  
  Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He 
 doesn't have
  anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to 
  this list. Your
  post is nothing but spam.  
  
  S/
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
   Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
  search sites, 
   or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
  
  I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
  circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
  you, perhaps,
  
  have something to hide?
  
  -- 
  Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
  Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
   |  / \AND POSTINGS
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  --
  --
  --
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
  confidential information intended only for the use of the 
  

RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Josefowski, Larry

Alvin and the Chipmunks.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract



  The Harmonikats?

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


I might be wrong;  Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing
that christmas song.  You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop?

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women 
 tend to swoon
 over...
 
 PBB
 ~ndi
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of 
 the acorns,
 then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM
  To: Baker, Jennifer
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Grrr... 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Video tape and fuji film.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  How would one know?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
  Tech Consultant
  Compaq Computer Corporation
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
  
  Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
  clarifications: 
  
  (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
  happen to spend
  most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK 
  employment
  situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  
  
  (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
  you'll see that I
  even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added 
  them in below
  again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty 
  folks on this
  list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.
  
  Gary
  
  
  -- 
  Gary K. Slinger
  Manager, Operations Design and Development
  CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
  Tampa, Florida
  US Office: +1-813-635-2189
  UK Office: +44-1293-582778
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  
  Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He 
 doesn't have
  anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to 
  this list. Your
  post is nothing but spam.  
  
  S/
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
   Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
  search sites, 
   or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
  
  I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
  circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
  you, perhaps,
  
  have something to hide?
  
  -- 
  Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
  Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
   |  / \AND POSTINGS
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  

RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone

2002-01-02 Thread Roger Seielstad

As does mine. They repeated go offline for days at a time. The worst part is
that they are paying someone else to run it for them, and they still do a
p*ss poor job of it.

Oh, its Exchange too.. I keep asking to take them on as a side job. One
server, and they are 10 minutes from the house. I could do it in my spare
time!

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
 
 
 My wife works for a school district. Her email hasn't worked 
 for 3 months. I have even offered to fix it for the whole 
 district for free, just so I can email her.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
 
 
 Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have 
 any experience
 
 with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4 
 weeks project 
 is on it's 5th month.
 
 
 
 
 At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if
 it works.  Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your 
 recommendations 
 anyway.
 
 Ed Crowley
 Compaq Computer
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
 
 
 When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I
 told
 
 them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any
 additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their 
 primary client and
 
 install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously 
 is running
 as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current 
 server HP
 LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about
 performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one 
 another box to off
 
 load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC 
 controller
 and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA 
 and SSL on 
 to the
 other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable
 Front/Back
 end then?   Also they may throw in another 512MB and another 
 processor
 to
 the original server. Any comments appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 _
 Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
 http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
 http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Tim Tullis

Actually David Seville as Alvin  The Chipmunks g...



-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Alvin and the Chipmunks.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract



  The Harmonikats?

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


I might be wrong;  Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing
that christmas song.  You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop?

 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women 
 tend to swoon
 over...
 
 PBB
 ~ndi
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of 
 the acorns,
 then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM
  To: Baker, Jennifer
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Grrr... 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Video tape and fuji film.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  How would one know?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
  Tech Consultant
  Compaq Computer Corporation
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
  
  Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
  clarifications: 
  
  (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
  happen to spend
  most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK 
  employment
  situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  
  
  (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
  you'll see that I
  even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added 
  them in below
  again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty 
  folks on this
  list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.
  
  Gary
  
  
  -- 
  Gary K. Slinger
  Manager, Operations Design and Development
  CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
  Tampa, Florida
  US Office: +1-813-635-2189
  UK Office: +44-1293-582778
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
  
  Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He 
 doesn't have
  anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to 
  this list. Your
  post is nothing but spam.  
  
  S/
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New year, no contract
  
  
   Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
  search sites, 
   or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
  
  I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
  circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
  you, perhaps,
  
  have something to hide?
  
  -- 
  Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
  Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
   |  / \AND POSTINGS
  
  
  _
  List posting 

RE: Exchange and Intranet

2002-01-02 Thread Rocky Stefano


Now thats a simple solution.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet


Upgrade to win2k and use AD.

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and Intranet


I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to
have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled
from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may
be able to forward on?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~~~

One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium
Man)--- 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Alex Alborzfard

Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created
in the other container?
 
Thanks
  
Alex Alborzfard
MCSE


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Tristan Gayford

What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't move them.


Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Mailboxes

Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created
in the other container?
 
Thanks
  
Alex Alborzfard
MCSE


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Joyce, Louis

No. Its not possible.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Mailboxes


Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created
in the other container?
 
Thanks
  
Alex Alborzfard
MCSE


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Alex Alborzfard

Yes. Then I have to delete  create new ones?

Alex Alborzfard
MCSE

-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes


What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't move them.


Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Mailboxes

Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created
in the other container?
 
Thanks
  
Alex Alborzfard
MCSE


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

Here's a question: Why bother?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 Yes. Then I have to delete  create new ones?
 
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't 
 move them.
 
 
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Mailboxes
 
 Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container 
 to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in 
 the other container?
  
 Thanks
   
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Martin Blackstone

Here is a better statement...
This is a perfect reason WHY recipient containers are a bad idea. Lots of
people think they would be cool to do by departments or whatever, then later
find they have created a nightmare.

There are of course good uses for a recipient container, but they should
always be static mailboxes.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes


Here's a question: Why bother?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 Yes. Then I have to delete  create new ones?
 
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't
 move them.
 
 
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Mailboxes
 
 Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
 to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in 
 the other container?
  
 Thanks
   
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Tristan Gayford

And then realise that address book views do what they wanted in the first
place.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 02 January 2002 15:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes

Here is a better statement...
This is a perfect reason WHY recipient containers are a bad idea. Lots of
people think they would be cool to do by departments or whatever, then later
find they have created a nightmare.

There are of course good uses for a recipient container, but they should
always be static mailboxes.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes


Here's a question: Why bother?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 Yes. Then I have to delete  create new ones?
 
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't
 move them.
 
 
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Mailboxes
 
 Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
 to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in 
 the other container?
  
 Thanks
   
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Third Party Fax Software for Exchange 2000

2002-01-02 Thread steve . iadarola

We are looking into adding a third party fax service to exchange 2000. 
Does anyone have any experience with any of the following products?  Any
input would be appreciated.  Feel free to contact me off list.

AVT RightFax v.6 or higher www.rightfax.com http://www.rightfax.com  
Esker FaxGate v.7 or higher www.esker.com http://www.esker.com  
FAXCOM for Exchange version 6.19 or higher www.strsoftware.com 
http://www.strsoftware.com
Fenestrae FAXination v.4 or higher www.faxination.com http://www.faxination.com
Interstar LightningFAX v.5.5 or higher www.lightningfax.com 
http://www.lightningfax.com
Omtool Fax Sr. v.3 or higher www.omtool.com http://www.omtool.com  
Optus FACSys v.4.5 or higher www.facsys.com http://www.facsys.com  


Steve Iadarola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Hayden Ave
Lexington, MA 02421
781.860.8660

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Greetings All

2002-01-02 Thread Mike Anderson

Hello,

I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for
several years now, on the Swynk website.

Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that
I can ask questions about ALL versions of Exchange?  Is that
true, or are there any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K?

Thanks in advance,

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Possible to change

2002-01-02 Thread Tierney, Gary

Per MS the only way to change this is through an event sink that looks
for the ndrs and changes the text on the way out. I have the same issue
on a server that we host other companies on and had opened a call with
MS on it.


Gary

-Original Message-
From: Soren Larsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Possible to change


Hello

I have got an Exchange 2000 server serving multiple email domains. When
the server creates NDR's, error reports or other system information, it
uses the actual Windows 2000 servername in the report. For eksample a
NDR would contain the following text:

server.nwtraders.internally #5.1.1

Is it possible to change this information? I would like it to say
mailsrvr.domain.com instead - without re-installing the server of
cause...

Soren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Third Party Fax Software for Exchange 2000

2002-01-02 Thread Steve Iadarola

We are looking into adding a third party fax service to exchange 2000.  Does
anyone have any experience with any of the following products?  Any input
would be appreciated.  Feel free to contact me off list.

AVT RightFax v.6 or higher www.rightfax.com http://www.rightfax.com  
Esker FaxGate v.7 or higher www.esker.com http://www.esker.com  
FAXCOM for Exchange version 6.19 or higher www.strsoftware.com
http://www.strsoftware.com  
Fenestrae FAXination v.4 or higher www.faxination.com
http://www.faxination.com  
Interstar LightningFAX v.5.5 or higher www.lightningfax.com
http://www.lightningfax.com  
Omtool Fax Sr. v.3 or higher www.omtool.com http://www.omtool.com  
Optus FACSys v.4.5 or higher www.facsys.com http://www.facsys.com  


Steve Iadarola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Hayden Ave
Lexington, MA 02421
781.860.8660

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Uuencode and Internet mail

2002-01-02 Thread Steve

Can anyone tell me how .zip attachments in email may be treated with
uuencoded for internet mail.

I have a filter set to prevent 5 mb attachments in via the IMC. I have
users sending 1.8 mb .zip attachments and they never reach me.

I am thinking the encoding process treats .zip files differently than
other attachments and is the cause of my problem.

Steve 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: accessing shared calendars within OWA

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

Not a default function, would require custom code at best.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:25 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: accessing shared calendars within OWA
 
 
 Exchange 5.5 sp4; NT 4 sp6a.  
 
 I have a question from a user about OWA that I have not been 
 able to come up with a good answer for.  He wants to be able 
 to use OWA to open other people's calendars, but that option 
 does not seem to be available.  He doesn't have any rights to 
 the mailbox itself, of course - just the calendar.
 
 Has anyone encountered this problem?  I couldn't come up with 
 even a clever work-around.
 
 Thanks,
 -Kirsten
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4

2002-01-02 Thread Steve

I am getting ready to do this install, can anyone shed light on any issues
they have encoutered with this antivirus solution?

Steve

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SCanmail and MTA

2002-01-02 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)

Ron,

My guess would be that some of your users are using .pst files to store
their mail they need archived.  If so, then they must have gotten that virus
prior to you implementing a good virus scanning policy.  Our users still run
into an occasional Marker infected attachment, along with a couple of other
real early macro virii, because of this particular scenario.

James H (Jim) Blunt
Network / Microsoft Exchange Admin.
Network  Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
509-372-9188

-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA


Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I
renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it
to  my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL
email? 
Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :)


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA

Exactly!!

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA


Try sending through a copy of eicar.com.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
 
 
 Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our 
 users.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
 
 If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause 
 the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case 
 it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned 
 before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't 
 matter).
 
 Chris
 --
 Chris Scharff
 Senior Sales Engineer
 MessageOne
 If you can't measure, you can't manage!
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
  
  
  Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan
  2nd!
  *shrug*
  I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described.
  Would that internal email be scanned? 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
  
  Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are
  you running and how is the message being sent?[1]
  
  [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service?
  
  Chris
  --
  Chris Scharff
  Senior Sales Engineer
  MessageOne
  If you can't measure, you can't manage!
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: SCanmail and MTA
   
   
   Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. 
   Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user 
   inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this
 case) to a DL.
   Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS 
   or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? 
   Thanks! Ron
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Greetings All

2002-01-02 Thread Robert Moore

People ask questions about all versions of Exchange. We rarely see
questions from anything before 5.5. Most of the questions are, indeed,
about 5.5. But there are also some about 2000.

Rob

-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greetings All


Hello,

I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for
several years now, on the Swynk website.

Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that
I can ask questions about ALL versions of Exchange?  Is that
true, or are there any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K?

Thanks in advance,

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

Be sure you have the hotfix There is a known issue with SP4 and
Groupshield, when the automatic update runs (updating .dat Files) the
service will cause 100% processor usage.
Other than that it runs great.

Joshua

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 6:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4


I am getting ready to do this install, can anyone shed light on any issues
they have encoutered with this antivirus solution?

Steve

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: E2K on a DC

2002-01-02 Thread John Q

I have a system that is a 2K DC and the only system in the domain that also
has E2K on it.
Here is the issue, when I go into users properties in AD I do not have the
Exchange Advanced tab.
I know why I think, cvause you can manage a Account from the exchange
server. But how do I get this funcionality?
I have found nothing no MS site, any ideas?

-Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone

2002-01-02 Thread Doug Hampshire

note to self: Roger has too much free time, must find more work

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone


As does mine. They repeated go offline for days at a time. The worst part is
that they are paying someone else to run it for them, and they still do a
p*ss poor job of it.

Oh, its Exchange too.. I keep asking to take them on as a side job. One
server, and they are 10 minutes from the house. I could do it in my spare
time!

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
 
 
 My wife works for a school district. Her email hasn't worked
 for 3 months. I have even offered to fix it for the whole 
 district for free, just so I can email her.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
 
 
 Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have
 any experience
 
 with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4
 weeks project 
 is on it's 5th month.
 
 
 
 
 At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if 
 it works.  Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your
 recommendations
 anyway.
 
 Ed Crowley
 Compaq Computer
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Demoting a E2K/2K server to standalone
 
 
 When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I 
 told
 
 them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any 
 additional servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their 
 primary client and
 
 install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously
 is running
 as a DC. There about 1000 + users and 3/4 will be using OWA. Current
 server HP
 LPRII with PIII 1ghz, 512MB and a 18GB Raid 5. I am worried about
 performance. Talked them into purchasing at least one 
 another box to off
 
 load services. My intention was to make the new server a DC
 controller
 and demote the current E2K to a member server. Also move OWA
 and SSL on
 to the
 other box. If so then I would need Enterprise version to enable 
 Front/Back
 end then?   Also they may throw in another 512MB and another 
 processor
 to
 the original server. Any comments appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 _
 Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
 http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
 http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: detecting an Exchange server on the Network

2002-01-02 Thread King, John

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Use tcpdump if u got a *nix box..  I am assuming windows only, so
there are some other options..  There is the tcpdump port for
windows, windump (requires a raw packet driver)..  A must have dl it
@ http://netgroup-serv.polito.it/windump/install/default.htm ..
It might be difficult to find an exchanger server that way, needle /
haystack , especially if no one knows hostnames/ips..  GFI software
makes a network scanner that is pretty nifty, free (as in beer) dl @
http://www.gfi.com/languard/lanscan.htm ..  You would need to know at
least a range of ips to scan.  HTML reports and all that jazz.. 
Sounds like maybe good old social interaction might be the
appropriate path as opposed to all these digital (01101) behind the
backs...

  Just some thoughts..

   ~John

- -Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: detecting an Exchange server on the Network


Is there a way to find out if there is an exchange Server on a
network
without knowing its name or IP? I have someone who wants to see if a
user/admin at another location is setting up email without his
knowledge. I
was thinking maybe use RPC-ping, but having never used it, I'm not
sure if
that would work or not, since he doesn't know ip address or name. 
Anyone have a good way? Network sniffer, scanning for SMTP traffic?
This
might work..but I think he wants to catch the server before it gets
to that
stage.
Thanks!
Ron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBPDM43blMSqGNvpxoEQKwFQCcC+kqO7D6k7AzbbTS6Wj9jWH5vEoAn17W
p+9rx2W0Z3/ZSi9upM7DpWOZ
=2Mbi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: detecting an Exchange server on the Network

2002-01-02 Thread Black, Nathan

Use Nmap www.insecure.org or another type of port scanner to connect to port
25 of a series of ip addresses through the network.

Nathan

 -Original Message-
 From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:15 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: detecting an Exchange server on the Network
 
 
 Is there a way to find out if there is an exchange Server on a network
 without knowing its name or IP? I have someone who wants to see if a
 user/admin at another location is setting up email without 
 his knowledge. I
 was thinking maybe use RPC-ping, but having never used it, 
 I'm not sure if
 that would work or not, since he doesn't know ip address or name. 
 Anyone have a good way? Network sniffer, scanning for SMTP 
 traffic? This
 might work..but I think he wants to catch the server before 
 it gets to that
 stage.
 Thanks!
 Ron
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Greetings All

2002-01-02 Thread Lefkovics, William

Ask on any version.  There are people here that supported 4.0.

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP, WLKMMAS, etc.
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greetings All


Hello,

I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for
several years now, on the Swynk website.

Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that
I can ask questions about ALL versions of Exchange?  Is that
true, or are there any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K?

Thanks in advance,

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Callan, Chris

Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Greetings All

2002-01-02 Thread Neil Hobson

I've still got the scars to prove it.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 02 January 2002 16:52
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Greetings All
Subject: RE: Greetings All


Ask on any version.  There are people here that supported 4.0.

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP, WLKMMAS, etc.
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greetings All


Hello,

I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for several years
now, on the Swynk website.

Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that I can ask
questions about ALL versions of Exchange?  Is that true, or are there
any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K?

Thanks in advance,

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Greetings All

2002-01-02 Thread Hurst, Paul

Yep, they are all fair game here ;-)

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours



-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greetings All


Hello,

I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for
several years now, on the Swynk website.

Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that
I can ask questions about ALL versions of Exchange?  Is that
true, or are there any specific Listservers for Exchange 2K?

Thanks in advance,

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any 
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this 
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The 
views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of 
Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony UK.
(04)
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Doug Hampshire

It sounds like you did everything correctly up until the installation point.
It is a generally recommended best practice to not actually install any CA
product on your systems. They function best if the shrink wrap is left
unbroken on the package. If you have accidentally installed any CA products
on your systems, I've found that reformatting your system is the only way to
truly uninstall the product. Their uninstall processes never works.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Andy David

Or even perhaps Antigen...


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


I don't get it, and I'm hoping someone would fill me in, why would anyone
use anything other than ScanMail on their Exchange systems?  ScanMail has
been nothing but a lifesaver for me and my company.   Is there something out
there that's even better than that product? I know this isn't the response
you wanted to hear but I would toss that CA software right in the garbage
and go out and purchase TrendMicro ScanMail.  

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


It sounds like you did everything correctly up until the installation point.
It is a generally recommended best practice to not actually install any CA
product on your systems. They function best if the shrink wrap is left
unbroken on the package. If you have accidentally installed any CA products
on your systems, I've found that reformatting your system is the only way to
truly uninstall the product. Their uninstall processes never works.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis, Suhler  Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax 
(212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank 
you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Kevin Miller

Marketing + moron managers = CA products. 

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


I don't get it, and I'm hoping someone would fill me in, why would
anyone use anything other than ScanMail on their Exchange systems?
ScanMail has
been nothing but a lifesaver for me and my company.   Is there something
out
there that's even better than that product? I know this isn't the
response you wanted to hear but I would toss that CA software right in
the garbage and go out and purchase TrendMicro ScanMail.  

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


It sounds like you did everything correctly up until the installation
point. It is a generally recommended best practice to not actually
install any CA product on your systems. They function best if the shrink
wrap is left unbroken on the package. If you have accidentally installed
any CA products on your systems, I've found that reformatting your
system is the only way to truly uninstall the product. Their uninstall
processes never works.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to
install the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe
files are all stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.
Well after a few hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I
look at the Task Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using
alot of cpu.  Am I doing something wrong.  Is the process just a
runaway, or is it actually doing something.  I have check my event log
and there have been no Virus stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show
any signs of being in use.  I am running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with
Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4

2002-01-02 Thread Durkee, Peter

Hotfix 7 to be exact. Also, when you're asked if you want to quarantine infected files 
in a folder or a database, choose database, or else the resolve names utility won't 
work. It may be included by now, but if it isn't, make sure to get the Message Body 
Scanning Utility from their website, as it's necessary for detecting viruses, like the 
kak worm, that are embedded in the HTML formatting.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4


Be sure you have the hotfix There is a known issue with SP4 and
Groupshield, when the automatic update runs (updating .dat Files) the
service will cause 100% processor usage.
Other than that it runs great.

Joshua

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 6:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4


I am getting ready to do this install, can anyone shed light on any issues
they have encoutered with this antivirus solution?

Steve

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Kelly_Borndale


Cause Antigen scans with multiple engines :)  In response to the why
anything but Trend thing.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor


|+---
||  Bowles, John  L.   |
||  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
||  Sent by: |
||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
||  .swynk.com   |
||   |
||   |
||  01/02/2002 12:24 PM  |
||  Please respond to|
||  Exchange Discussions   |
||   |
|+---
  
|
  |
|
  |  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |  cc:   
|
  |  Subject: RE: Another CA Problem   
|
  
|




I don't get it, and I'm hoping someone would fill me in, why would anyone
use anything other than ScanMail on their Exchange systems?  ScanMail has
been nothing but a lifesaver for me and my company.   Is there something
out
there that's even better than that product? I know this isn't the response
you wanted to hear but I would toss that CA software right in the garbage
and go out and purchase TrendMicro ScanMail.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


It sounds like you did everything correctly up until the installation
point.
It is a generally recommended best practice to not actually install any CA
product on your systems. They function best if the shrink wrap is left
unbroken on the package. If you have accidentally installed any CA products
on your systems, I've found that reformatting your system is the only way
to
truly uninstall the product. Their uninstall processes never works.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Lefkovics, William

Hopefully they'll improve that pathetic, lame interface.

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP, WLKMMAS, etc.
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net  
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem



Cause Antigen scans with multiple engines :)  In response to the why
anything but Trend thing.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor


|+---
||  Bowles, John  L.   |
||  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
||  Sent by: |
||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
||  .swynk.com   |
||   |
||   |
||  01/02/2002 12:24 PM  |
||  Please respond to|
||  Exchange Discussions   |
||   |
|+---
 
---
-|
  |
|
  |  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |  cc:
|
  |  Subject: RE: Another CA Problem
|
 
---
-|




I don't get it, and I'm hoping someone would fill me in, why would anyone
use anything other than ScanMail on their Exchange systems?  ScanMail has
been nothing but a lifesaver for me and my company.   Is there something
out
there that's even better than that product? I know this isn't the response
you wanted to hear but I would toss that CA software right in the garbage
and go out and purchase TrendMicro ScanMail.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


It sounds like you did everything correctly up until the installation
point.
It is a generally recommended best practice to not actually install any CA
product on your systems. They function best if the shrink wrap is left
unbroken on the package. If you have accidentally installed any CA products
on your systems, I've found that reformatting your system is the only way
to
truly uninstall the product. Their uninstall processes never works.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To 

RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Callan, Chris

Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped.  I am running
version 4.53.  As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in
here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be
100% better.  Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies.

What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Greetings All

2002-01-02 Thread Doug Hampshire

You can ask about any version here, but there is also a dedicated E2K
mailing list. You can find the FAQ, as well as subscribe instructions at
http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greetings All


Hello,

I just joined this list, but I belonged the ASP list for several years now,
on the Swynk website.

Since this Listserver is named Exchange - that tells me that I can ask
questions about ALL versions of Exchange?  Is that true, or are there any
specific Listservers for Exchange 2K?

Thanks in advance,

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Mailboxes

2002-01-02 Thread Alex Alborzfard

After saving their data, I deleted the old mailboxes and put them in a new
recipient container,
but now neither regular SMTP or POP or OWA work.
Any ideas?

-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes


And then realise that address book views do what they wanted in the first
place.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 02 January 2002 15:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes

Here is a better statement...
This is a perfect reason WHY recipient containers are a bad idea. Lots of
people think they would be cool to do by departments or whatever, then later
find they have created a nightmare.

There are of course good uses for a recipient container, but they should
always be static mailboxes.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes


Here's a question: Why bother?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 Yes. Then I have to delete  create new ones?
 
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Mailboxes
 
 
 What version are you using - if it is 5.5, then no you can't
 move them.
 
 
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 January 2002 15:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Mailboxes
 
 Is it possible to move mailboxes from one Recipient Container
 to another or they have to be deleted and then re-created in 
 the other container?
  
 Thanks
   
 Alex Alborzfard
 MCSE
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Aaron Brasslett

Next question is why are you manually installing the updates?  I run the
same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and
restarts all the necessary bits for me.  I have very little problems with
that arrangement.  Have you tried using it?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped.  I am running
version 4.53.  As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in
here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be
100% better.  Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies.

What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OWA Sent Items View

2002-01-02 Thread Bob P. Antonietti

Hello.

When using OWA to access one's email, the view for the Sent Items folder
is sorted by the From: field.  Is there a way to change that view so
that OWA will show emails sorted by the To: field and display the
address to which the emails have be sent?

Thank you!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OWA Sent Items View

2002-01-02 Thread Bob P. Antonietti

Hello.

When using OWA to access one's email, the view for the Sent Items folder
is sorted by the From field.  Is there a way to change that view so that
OWA will show emails sorted by the To field and display the address to
which the emails have be sent?

Thank you!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



How to hide recipients addresses

2002-01-02 Thread Hong Bui

I have Windows 2000 DC and a Exchange 2000 server.

Our marketing people wanted to send a weekly e-mail to our customers
(about 500) from their contact lists in Outlook, but they don't want to
show customers' names or e-mail addresses on the TO list.  They wanted
something similar like The Swync subscribe email: exchange digest
recipients on the TO line.  I don't want to import customer e-mail
addresses to our global address book.  How do I create a contact DL with
an email address so it masks all private email addresses?

Thanks in advance.

Hong.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to hide recipients addresses

2002-01-02 Thread Dustin Krysak

BCC field within outlook.

-Original Message-
From: Hong Bui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: January 2, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to hide recipients addresses


I have Windows 2000 DC and a Exchange 2000 server.

Our marketing people wanted to send a weekly e-mail to our customers (about
500) from their contact lists in Outlook, but they don't want to show
customers' names or e-mail addresses on the TO list.  They wanted something
similar like The Swync subscribe email: exchange digest recipients on the
TO line.  I don't want to import customer e-mail addresses to our global
address book.  How do I create a contact DL with an email address so it
masks all private email addresses?

Thanks in advance.

Hong.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Darcy Adams

You got that right, Ed!  And he's a snuggly ass, too!

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


You may be an ass, but you're OUR ass!  We love you Gary!

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Yeah, I've been called that before, but not by anyone whose opinion I
particularly care about [1].  I just happen to have a fairly low
tolerance for idiots on what was once (and occasionally still is) the
best list for peer-level Exchange discussions [2] [3].

There are folks on this list that can comment on my approach, etc., and
if they do, I'll listen.  You're not one of them.  Of course, if you'd
like to discuss your insults in person anytime, you'll find me at MEC
2002, wherever it happens to be.

Finally, following on from the above, you are who?  In 4300 messages,
going back to mid-November [4] I see three posts from you - your
grammatically correct, if inelegant, post below, and two copies of the
same question,
timed within one minute of each other,   A relatively basic question at
that.  You get to flame me when you've contributed some more. [5]

Gary


[1] There is no...
[2] I believe Mr. Tuip's list has that distinction now.
[3] Rather than a technical support center for the lazy, incompetent or
ignorant. [4] I don't think restoring my list archives would provide any
additional information, so I haven't done so. [5] You'll need to go back
a couple of years to determine whether or not I contribute; I watch now,
as I build datacenters rather than exchange servers. [6] [6] Dagnabbit!
I want to be a techie again!

-Original Message-
From: Paul J. Caritj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 17:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


You're an ass.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Well here's a thought genius - try using a jobsearch site, like, oh I
don't know, how about www.jobsearch.co.uk?  Rather than spamming this
list with your pathetic little almost-resume?  Particularly as this list
knows what a jerk you made of yourself with ORB UK.  Complete arrogance
and ineptitude in your behaviour regarding UCE, and yet here you are now
spamming several thousand computer professionals.

Alternatively, please practice Would you like fries with that?, as
that is probably the best place for you to end up. [1]

Gary

[1] And for added giggle value folks, the listed rate of 35 thousand
euros, well that's around 21 thousand pounds sterling, or 31 thousand US
dollars. Pretty much what you could get as a starting manager at some
corporate fast-food joint...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 15:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: New year, no contract


Hi folks...

Off topic for the list, but what the hell, it's christmas.

Since ORB UK is now closed pending the creation of Horus, that means I'm
out of contract now.

I'm 30, been using MS since before they bought DOS, and I'm a Microsoft
Partner in my own right.

I have experience in Windows from 3.1 to ME, OS/2 and NT from 2.1 to XP,
DOS'en from 3.3 to 7.1, and Linux. I also use BeOS, MacOS X, FreeBSD and
SVR4. My current 'learning experience' is QNX.

I have experience of Sendmail, QMail, Exim, Exchange 5 and 5.5, and
Mailtraq, and have used SPTM, POP3, APOP, ETRN and ODMR.

I've been doing telephone and deskside support for the better end of 4
years, and was part of the support team during the launch of Telewest
SurfUnlimited. I've used and supported ISDN, ADSL, and Cable Modems, as
well as Leased Line, Routed Solutions and Plain Old dial-up. Sad though
I am, I can identify a modem model and a RAS by ear. With Lucent
Portmasters, I can even tell the ComOs release by listening to it.

I'm based in Basingstoke, UK, but don't mind commuting, consulting,
homeworking, Remote Adminning, or even travelling if the price is right.
I'll do Contract or Permanent, and would be looking for ˆ25 per hour for
Contract or ˆ35,000 per annum for permanent.

If you want more info, or a CV, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Many thanks all.

--
Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
 |  / \AND POSTINGS


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   

RE: How to hide recipients addresses

2002-01-02 Thread Thomas Di Nardo

Why not use mail merge? That way each customer gets a personalized
email. Much cleaner and it looks more professional.

Just my $.02.

Tom.


-Original Message-
From: Hong Bui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to hide recipients addresses

I have Windows 2000 DC and a Exchange 2000 server.

Our marketing people wanted to send a weekly e-mail to our customers
(about 500) from their contact lists in Outlook, but they don't want to
show customers' names or e-mail addresses on the TO list.  They wanted
something similar like The Swync subscribe email: exchange digest
recipients on the TO line.  I don't want to import customer e-mail
addresses to our global address book.  How do I create a contact DL with
an email address so it masks all private email addresses?

Thanks in advance.

Hong.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Darcy Adams

I *think* I saw Gary sober. . . the sobriety lasted only a few minutes, though.

-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 12:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Uh huh, and you set SUCH a good example in Orlando...!

G.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?


-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 

Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
clarifications: 

(a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I happen to spend
most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment
situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries.  

(b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, you'll see that I
even put my contact details in most of my posts.  I've added them in below
again, to make the point.  There are also more than twenty folks on this
list (a loose guess) that have met me in person.

Gary


-- 
Gary K. Slinger
Manager, Operations Design and Development
CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
Tampa, Florida
US Office: +1-813-635-2189
UK Office: +44-1293-582778



-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract



Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He doesn't have
anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your
post is nothing but spam.  

S/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract


 Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites,
 or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.

I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, 
have something to hide?

-- 
Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
 |  / \AND POSTINGS


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler 
Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to hide recipients addresses

2002-01-02 Thread Hong Bui

Mail Merge? Can you give some me some basic info how to do a mail merge?
That's a good idea.  I'm going to read on it.  Hong.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Sent Items View

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

From deja.com:

All you need to do is go into your Sent Items folder and create a new
Outlook view with the To field in the view.  Make sure under the Sent Items
folder property that you have Automatically generate Microsoft Exchange
View enabled before you create the new view.  Then, logon to OWA and you
should see your new view with all the fields you added. - Tom Rizzo

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Bob P. Antonietti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OWA Sent Items View
 
 
 Hello.
 
 When using OWA to access one's email, the view for the Sent 
 Items folder is sorted by the From: field.  Is there a way 
 to change that view so that OWA will show emails sorted by 
 the To: field and display the address to which the emails 
 have be sent?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to hide recipients addresses

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/2002/articles/wdolGetThePartwithXP.as
px



 -Original Message-
 From: Hong Bui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: How to hide recipients addresses
 
 
 Mail Merge? Can you give some me some basic info how to do a 
 mail merge? That's a good idea.  I'm going to read on it.  Hong.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hide recipient but allow access internally

2002-01-02 Thread Ron Jameson

I have an email account that is used as a deposit email account (resumes).
This email box will be used by multiple people to view its contents and
forward manually as needed.  I do not want users internally to be able to
see this in the GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other
users.  Can this be done?  The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL will not allow
users to open.


Regards,

Ron Jameson
James Hamlin Consulting Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hide recipient but allow access internally

2002-01-02 Thread Soysal, Serdar

Use a public folder instead.

-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide recipient but allow access internally


I have an email account that is used as a deposit email account (resumes).
This email box will be used by multiple people to view its contents and
forward manually as needed.  I do not want users internally to be able to
see this in the GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other
users.  Can this be done?  The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL will not allow
users to open.


Regards,

Ron Jameson
James Hamlin Consulting Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hide recipient but allow access internally

2002-01-02 Thread Dustin Krysak

If you setup the user machines, then hide the address, it will work.
Unfortunately you will need to unhide the address every time you want to
config a client.

  Dustin



-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: January 2, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide recipient but allow access internally


I have an email account that is used as a deposit email account (resumes).
This email box will be used by multiple people to view its contents and
forward manually as needed.  I do not want users internally to be able to
see this in the GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other
users.  Can this be done?  The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL will not allow
users to open.


Regards,

Ron Jameson
James Hamlin Consulting Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hide recipient but allow access internally

2002-01-02 Thread Soysal, Serdar

And, if you use a public folder you never have to do any of that.  

-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hide recipient but allow access internally


If you setup the user machines, then hide the address, it will work.
Unfortunately you will need to unhide the address every time you want to
config a client.

  Dustin



-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: January 2, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide recipient but allow access internally


I have an email account that is used as a deposit email account (resumes).
This email box will be used by multiple people to view its contents and
forward manually as needed.  I do not want users internally to be able to
see this in the GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other
users.  Can this be done?  The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL will not allow
users to open.


Regards,

Ron Jameson
James Hamlin Consulting Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hide recipient but allow access internally

2002-01-02 Thread Martin Blackstone

Why hide it? It isn't like people wouldn't be expecting resumes

-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide recipient but allow access internally


I have an email account that is used as a deposit email account (resumes).
This email box will be used by multiple people to view its contents and
forward manually as needed.  I do not want users internally to be able to
see this in the GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other
users.  Can this be done?  The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL will not allow
users to open.


Regards,

Ron Jameson
James Hamlin Consulting Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hide recipient but allow access internally

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

Suggestions:

1. Don't hide it.
2. Don't hide it and name the mailbox display name Bob Jones.
3. Add the mailbox using the Exchange DN.
4. Unhide the mailbox, add it and then hide it.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Hide recipient but allow access internally
 
 
 I have an email account that is used as a deposit email 
 account (resumes). This email box will be used by multiple 
 people to view its contents and forward manually as needed.  
 I do not want users internally to be able to see this in the 
 GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other 
 users.  Can this be done?  The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL 
 will not allow users to open.
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Ron Jameson
 James Hamlin Consulting Inc.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Can't send to our Domain

2002-01-02 Thread DOT

I received this, quoted portion, via email from the postmaster at
caicheuvreuw.com.  They indicated that they are experiencing a time-out when
sending email to us and wanted to know if  we are having a problem.  They
can send to us via their yahoo account but not via their domain account.
Sounds like their problem.

Reporting-MTA: dns; pasmtp003.caicheuvreux.com Arrival-Date: Wed, 2 Jan
2002 12:04:13 +0100 (MET)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; exchsmtp2.wmblair.com Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002
16:22:14 +0100 (MET)
Will-Retry-Until: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:04:13 +0100 (MET)

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company
(312) 364-8227


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Aaron Brasslett

And those errors are...

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Tried to set it up and use it, but it wouldn't work.  Kept running into
errors.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Next question is why are you manually installing the updates?  I run the
same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and
restarts all the necessary bits for me.  I have very little problems with
that arrangement.  Have you tried using it?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped.  I am running
version 4.53.  As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in
here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be
100% better.  Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies.

What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can't send to our Domain

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

Yes it does.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:14 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Can't send to our Domain
 
 
 I received this, quoted portion, via email from the 
 postmaster at caicheuvreuw.com.  They indicated that they are 
 experiencing a time-out when sending email to us and wanted 
 to know if  we are having a problem.  They can send to us via 
 their yahoo account but not via their domain account. Sounds 
 like their problem.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Lefkovics, William

You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Mezyk, Tom

GALMOD it is on the BORK.

Tom Mezyk 
IT - Messaging Support 
Houston, TX 
* 832.351.7580 
(   832.244.9491
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

==
NOTICE - This message may contain confidential and privileged information that is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or 
reliance on this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in 
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from 
your computer.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can't send to our Domain

2002-01-02 Thread Byron Kennedy

have them confirm they can resolve at connect to your smtprelay on port 25.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't send to our Domain


I received this, quoted portion, via email from the postmaster at
caicheuvreuw.com.  They indicated that they are experiencing a time-out when
sending email to us and wanted to know if  we are having a problem.  They
can send to us via their yahoo account but not via their domain account.
Sounds like their problem.

Reporting-MTA: dns; pasmtp003.caicheuvreux.com Arrival-Date: Wed, 2 Jan
2002 12:04:13 +0100 (MET)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; exchsmtp2.wmblair.com Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002
16:22:14 +0100 (MET)
Will-Retry-Until: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:04:13 +0100 (MET)

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company
(312) 364-8227


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



E2K OWA Contact list Question.

2002-01-02 Thread Tony Hlabse

OWA users wants access to their Contact info that resides on Outloook 2000. 
Does anybody know of a way to import this info. The only way I know is to 
manually keyin that data from the OWA client.



_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Martin Blackstone

No. More like Galmod from the resource kit

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

So by all of your responses GalMod is good?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No. More like Galmod from the resource kit

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Callan, Chris

It has been awhile since I tried to do it.  I don't remember the errors.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


And those errors are...

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Tried to set it up and use it, but it wouldn't work.  Kept running into
errors.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Next question is why are you manually installing the updates?  I run the
same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and
restarts all the necessary bits for me.  I have very little problems with
that arrangement.  Have you tried using it?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped.  I am running
version 4.53.  As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in
here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be
100% better.  Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies.

What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: E2K OWA Contact list Question.

2002-01-02 Thread Mezyk, Tom

Click the Contacts icon on the left?

Tom Mezyk


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K OWA Contact list Question.


OWA users wants access to their Contact info that resides on Outloook 2000. 
Does anybody know of a way to import this info. The only way I know is to 
manually keyin that data from the OWA client.



_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

==
NOTICE - This message may contain confidential and privileged information that is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or 
reliance on this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in 
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from 
your computer.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Martin Blackstone

No, don't use Galmod. Use GalModaccording to William.

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


So by all of your responses GalMod is good?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No. More like Galmod from the resource kit

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

Isn't that what I said  :)



 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No, don't use Galmod. Use GalModaccording to William.

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


So by all of your responses GalMod is good?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No. More like Galmod from the resource kit

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4

2002-01-02 Thread Randal, Phil

After installing Groupshield 4.5 SP1 install Hotfix 7 (from
www.mcafeeb2b.com).

Then consult Microsoft's knowledgebase Q264731 and increase the value of
OpenRetryDelay (we use 0x800 here).

Don't forget to install the message body scanning addon either (also
from mcafeeb2b.com).

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 01 January 2002 23:34
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4
 
 
 I am getting ready to do this install, can anyone shed light 
 on any issues
 they have encoutered with this antivirus solution?
 
 Steve
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

Ok I copied all the files and created a virtual directory but when It
prompts me to log in It never allows me... Any ideas?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No, don't use Galmod. Use GalModaccording to William.

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


So by all of your responses GalMod is good?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No. More like Galmod from the resource kit

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

www.mail-resources.com | servers | directory management

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:08 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: User Information
 
 
 Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to 
 modify there own Mailbox info?
 
  
  
  
  
 Joshua Morgan
 PROFITLAB
 Network Engineer
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE

Yep. I second that.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:45 AM
To: ExchangeList@swynk
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem



Cause Antigen scans with multiple engines :)  In response to the why
anything but Trend thing.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Another CA Problem

2002-01-02 Thread Aaron Brasslett

Okay.

Have you tried stop the services via the InoculateIT Service Manager?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


It has been awhile since I tried to do it.  I don't remember the errors.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


And those errors are...

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Tried to set it up and use it, but it wouldn't work.  Kept running into
errors.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Next question is why are you manually installing the updates?  I run the
same version and you the auto download thingy and it automatically stops and
restarts all the necessary bits for me.  I have very little problems with
that arrangement.  Have you tried using it?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


Okay, CA says that all of the RTExch's weren't stopped.  I am running
version 4.53.  As far as why we use it. It was inherited when I came in
here, and I am trying to convince them that ScanMail or Antigen would be
100% better.  Not only that they have me constantly scanning my machine.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another CA Problem


First, may I sincerely say I'm sorry and you have my deepest sympathies.

What version of InoculateIT are you trying to use?

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another CA Problem


Another problem I seem to have every so often with InoculateIT.  After I
apply one of their Signature updates.  I do all required steps to install
the patch.  I stop the services and make sure the RTExch.exe files are all
stopped, then I apply the patch, and restart my services.  Well after a few
hours I notice that my server is pegged at 100% and I look at the Task
Manager and the RTExch.exe's that are running are using alot of cpu.  Am I
doing something wrong.  Is the process just a runaway, or is it actually
doing something.  I have check my event log and there have been no Virus
stops, and my InoculateIT accounts do show any signs of being in use.  I am
running a NT 4.0 server SP6a, with Exchange 5.5 SP4.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: User Information

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

Ok I figured that part out Is there anyway to skip a few of these pages?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


Ok I copied all the files and created a virtual directory but when It
prompts me to log in It never allows me... Any ideas?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No, don't use Galmod. Use GalModaccording to William.

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


So by all of your responses GalMod is good?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


No. More like Galmod from the resource kit

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Information


You mean like Galmod from the resource kit?

William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net 
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: User Information


Does anyone have any good .asp pages that allow users to modify there own
Mailbox info?

 
 
 
 
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: anyone know

2002-01-02 Thread WILLIAMS,JESSICA D

As long as you're away from the coast.  I've never lived in the Northwest,
but nor'easter's (small winter hurricanes) make Iceland seem like a warm
place.  I lived in Va Beach for 3 years and Iceland for 2 and a half.  It
was definitely a toss up as to which was warmer some days.

Jessica

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


As a side note, I'm fixin to move to NC which will be considerably warmer
though.  ;o)

D

There is nothing to fear but fear itself. -Franklin D. Roosevelt

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains.  Of course you'll freeze your hiney
off!  ;o)

I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs
today...  ;o)

D

There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed
Crowley

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native
So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in
Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally
have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free [1]. 

[1] I'm just a vendor 'ho

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Go Huskies!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o)

D

[1] Or so I hope they do...[2]
[2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3]
[3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4]
[4] HI SHERRY!!!  ;o)

The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we
behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1]

[1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much
pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm
Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show.
The Singing Pilgrims.


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


It's something the Pilgrims singed.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


What is a Compaq?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


hold on let me check

-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


What does the network admin say?  Seriously what does it say in the Compaq
array config util?  

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: anyone know


I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive
is not lit up  and the server is a compaq prol ml370.  Does this mean 
the hard drive failed. Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Need Help badly - Exchange 2000 / OWA

2002-01-02 Thread Mike Anderson

Greetings All,

I have multiple issues I am working on.  Let me first say 
that I have extensive Internet experience behind me, and 
have been working with every mail server under the sun 
over the years.  Exchange however, always has come off 
more complex than it needed to be - but I know that 
Exchange is an incredible solution.  I have limited 
experience with Exchange 5.5, but I am now installing 
Exchange 2000 - and I am experiencing some problems.

I set up a virtual POP3 and SMTP domain for one of our 
customers - and I have POP3 and SMTP working properly.  I 
can use Outlook 2K to access my mailbox - and all works 
beautifully.

BUT when I try to access the mail server using the Web 
Interface, I am having tons of problems.  I keep getting 
access denied, or simply no pages coming up at all.  I 
checked all the IIS settings, and things seem to be 
pointing to the correct directories according to the Docs 
I have been reading up on.  After installing Exchange 2000 
onto my Windows 2000 Server machine, it created a new 
drive called M - and that's what IIS refers to for all 
the Virtual Directory stuff.

One example I can provide is the following:  Our server is 
called Exchange - so in the browser, I typed in 
http://exchange/exchange/ - then it prompts me for a 
Username and Password - so instinctively, I used the 
Administrator login and password - and it DOESN'T work.  
What the heck am I supposed to use, if the Admin login 
doesn't even work???  This is the first thing that 
indicated to me, that something is terribly wrong.

What things do I need to do or have in place in order to 
get the Web Access to work?  I would love to have some 
additional docs or resources I can look at, that would walk 
me through each and every painful step required to get 
this to work.  And troubleshooting processes to - 

My environment is as follows:  I have a Windows 2000 
Server Domain Controller so that provides all the Active 
Directory stuff.  Then my Exchange 2000 Server is a 
standalone server that belongs to the domain.  It's not 
setup as a backup controller or anything like that.

Any information you can pass along to me, would be greatly 
appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



PEWA

2002-01-02 Thread Vinny Avallone

Is there any reason NOT to install Outlook 2000 on my W2K Exchange 2000
server?
There is a neat tool called Password Expiry Warning Application with the
E2K Resource kit I want to use.
It needs to use an Exchange profile from Outlook.

Any advice is appreciated.


--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PEWA

2002-01-02 Thread Chris Scharff

Other than it isn't supported? Not really. 

Personally, I use the Exchange 5.0 client instead.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:10 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: PEWA
 
 
 Is there any reason NOT to install Outlook 2000 on my W2K 
 Exchange 2000 server? There is a neat tool called Password 
 Expiry Warning Application with the E2K Resource kit I want 
 to use. It needs to use an Exchange profile from Outlook.
 
 Any advice is appreciated.
 
 
 --
 Vincent Avallone
 iBiquity Digital
 (410) 872-1535
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Need Help badly - Exchange 2000 / OWA

2002-01-02 Thread Jason Kelley

Just a quick thought when you used the administrator name and password did
you specify the domain that the admin account belongs to?

Try domain name\user name in the user field then the password in the
password field.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need Help badly - Exchange 2000 / OWA


Greetings All,

I have multiple issues I am working on.  Let me first say 
that I have extensive Internet experience behind me, and 
have been working with every mail server under the sun 
over the years.  Exchange however, always has come off 
more complex than it needed to be - but I know that 
Exchange is an incredible solution.  I have limited 
experience with Exchange 5.5, but I am now installing 
Exchange 2000 - and I am experiencing some problems.

I set up a virtual POP3 and SMTP domain for one of our 
customers - and I have POP3 and SMTP working properly.  I 
can use Outlook 2K to access my mailbox - and all works 
beautifully.

BUT when I try to access the mail server using the Web 
Interface, I am having tons of problems.  I keep getting 
access denied, or simply no pages coming up at all.  I 
checked all the IIS settings, and things seem to be 
pointing to the correct directories according to the Docs 
I have been reading up on.  After installing Exchange 2000 
onto my Windows 2000 Server machine, it created a new 
drive called M - and that's what IIS refers to for all 
the Virtual Directory stuff.

One example I can provide is the following:  Our server is 
called Exchange - so in the browser, I typed in 
http://exchange/exchange/ - then it prompts me for a 
Username and Password - so instinctively, I used the 
Administrator login and password - and it DOESN'T work.  
What the heck am I supposed to use, if the Admin login 
doesn't even work???  This is the first thing that 
indicated to me, that something is terribly wrong.

What things do I need to do or have in place in order to 
get the Web Access to work?  I would love to have some 
additional docs or resources I can look at, that would walk 
me through each and every painful step required to get 
this to work.  And troubleshooting processes to - 

My environment is as follows:  I have a Windows 2000 
Server Domain Controller so that provides all the Active 
Directory stuff.  Then my Exchange 2000 Server is a 
standalone server that belongs to the domain.  It's not 
setup as a backup controller or anything like that.

Any information you can pass along to me, would be greatly 
appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PEWA

2002-01-02 Thread Morgan, Joshua

Do you know if the tool will work with Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PEWA


Is there any reason NOT to install Outlook 2000 on my W2K Exchange 2000
server? There is a neat tool called Password Expiry Warning Application with
the E2K Resource kit I want to use. It needs to use an Exchange profile from
Outlook.

Any advice is appreciated.


--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PEWA

2002-01-02 Thread Vinny Avallone

Unfortunately I do not know.
I can use the tool on any machine.  I just thought the Exchange box
would be a good idea.  The readme suggests putting it on a DC, so I
think that is what I will do.

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PEWA

Do you know if the tool will work with Exchange 5.5?

 
 
 
 
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PEWA


Is there any reason NOT to install Outlook 2000 on my W2K Exchange 2000
server? There is a neat tool called Password Expiry Warning Application
with
the E2K Resource kit I want to use. It needs to use an Exchange profile
from
Outlook.

Any advice is appreciated.


--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Dustin Krysak


Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an open
relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want to
make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
exchange server from being an open relay?

--
Dustin Krysak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Jennifer Baker

Telnet to port 25 of the machine
Search the internet for open relay exchange 5.5, there is a good article in
exchangeadmin.com somewhere.
Here's a telnet example:
220 invvan2kex.inventaworld.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail S
ervice 5.5.2653.13) ready
ehlo
250-invvan2kex.inventaworld.com Hello [mail.fluke.com]
250-XEXCH50
250-HELP
250-ETRN
250-DSN
250-SIZE 0
250-AUTH LOGIN
250 AUTH=LOGIN
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED]
data
354 Send data.  End with CRLF.CRLF
to: jen
from: jen
subject: open relay
.
250 OK

-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: open relay



Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an open
relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want to
make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
exchange server from being an open relay?

--
Dustin Krysak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Steven A. Christensen

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q249266

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q199656

Steve C.

- Original Message -
From: Dustin Krysak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:36 PM
Subject: open relay



 Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an
open
 relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want
to
 make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

 And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
 exchange server from being an open relay?

 --
 Dustin Krysak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)

www.samspade.org

Scroll down the page till you see the field with the Blackhole button next
to it.  Input the IP address of your server and click the button.  It will
check about 18 different blackhole listings for your address, without adding
you to any lists.

-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: open relay



Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an open
relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want to
make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
exchange server from being an open relay?

--
Dustin Krysak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Matt Hoffman

Check this out:  http://www.abuse.net/relay.html

And the info on closing your open relay:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696

-Matt

-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: open relay



Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an open
relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want to
make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
exchange server from being an open relay?

--
Dustin Krysak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: New year, no contract

2002-01-02 Thread Roger Seielstad

I saw him sober, too. I believe he even said I'll take a Corona, mate

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:12 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 I *think* I saw Gary sober. . . the sobriety lasted only a 
 few minutes, though.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 12:59 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Uh huh, and you set SUCH a good example in Orlando...!
 
 G.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 16:28
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. 
 
 Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
 clarifications: 
 
 (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex.  I 
 happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully 
 cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring 
 influence in both countries.  
 
 (b) I have nothing to hide.  If you search the archives, 
 you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my 
 posts.  I've added them in below again, to make the point.  
 There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose 
 guess) that have met me in person.
 
 Gary
 
 
 -- 
 Gary K. Slinger
 Manager, Operations Design and Development
 CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning  Projects
 Tampa, Florida
 US Office: +1-813-635-2189
 UK Office: +44-1293-582778
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
 
 Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head.  He 
 doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable 
 contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam.  
 
 S/
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New year, no contract
 
 
  Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using 
 search sites, 
  or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
 
 I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the 
 circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do 
 you, perhaps, 
 have something to hide?
 
 -- 
 Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer  |  /\ASCII RIBBON
 Tel: 07021 117179  Fax: 07092 105150 +  \ /  CAMPAIGN
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
  |  / \AND POSTINGS
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged 
 and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
 of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
 notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
 message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
 email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler  
 Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax 
 (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 ==
 ==
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To 

RE: open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Martin Blackstone

http://www.abuse.net/relay.html

-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: open relay



Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an open
relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want to
make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
exchange server from being an open relay?

--
Dustin Krysak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: open relay

2002-01-02 Thread Daniel Chenault

Why bother with web-based?

From any machine who's IP address is not an allowed relayer in IMS
Properties:
telnet ip of server) 25
HELO your machine name
MAIL FROM:some real external address, like hotmail
RCPT TO:an address outside your organization you have access to
DATA
blah-blah-blah, yadda-yadda
. (that's a period on a line by itself)

Check both the MAIL and RCPT address to see if the message relayed or it
bounced. Mission accomplished.

- Original Message -
From: Dustin Krysak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:36 PM
Subject: open relay



 Hi there... I'm looking for a web based test to see if my machine is an
open
 relay - BUT I need a test that doesn't blacklist me anywhere. I just want
to
 make sure, and if I am fix the issue ASAP.

 And also - since I am pretty new to exchange - how does one seal up an
 exchange server from being an open relay?

 --
 Dustin Krysak

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



suppressing R e a d r e c e i p t s

2002-01-02 Thread Jon Hill

The Lord High Mucky-Muck at my firm is *finally* acceding to our demands
that she clean up her mailbox.  One of her assistants has been tasked with
going through the 5000 items in her Inbox and filing/deleting them as
appropriate.  For any message that contains an attachment, she is to save
the attachment to a specified share, delete the attachment from the message,
and add text indicating where the attachment was saved.

Unfortunately, whenever the assistant opens an e-mail that has Read Receipts
enabled, the receipt that goes out says that the assistant has opened the
message.  This understandably bothers a lot of the senders, because much of
this mail is confidential.

We've added the manager's Mailbox to the assistant's Exchange profile.  What
I'd really like to do is suppress all Read Receipts for the assistant (so
they could still fire when the manager opens a message), but even a global
Read Receipt suppression would be better than what we have right now.

We're currently running Exch 5.5 but will upgrade to 2K in 3-4 weeks.  The
client is Outlook 2K.

Any help would be tremendously appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: anyone know

2002-01-02 Thread Don Ely

Funny, I lived in Island for a couple of years and I'm pretty sure no part
of NC could compare with how cold it got there in the winter.  ;o)  I'll be
outside of Raleigh though and while it does get chilly, it's certainly
something that won't bother me.

D

UNIX is an operating system, OS/2 is half an operating system, Windows is a
shell, and DOS is a boot partition virus. -Peter H. Coffin

-Original Message-
From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


As long as you're away from the coast.  I've never lived in the Northwest,
but nor'easter's (small winter hurricanes) make Iceland seem like a warm
place.  I lived in Va Beach for 3 years and Iceland for 2 and a half.  It
was definitely a toss up as to which was warmer some days.

Jessica

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


As a side note, I'm fixin to move to NC which will be considerably warmer
though.  ;o)

D

There is nothing to fear but fear itself. -Franklin D. Roosevelt

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains.  Of course you'll freeze your hiney
off!  ;o)

I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs
today...  ;o)

D

There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed
Crowley

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native
So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in
Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally
have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free [1]. 

[1] I'm just a vendor 'ho

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Go Huskies!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o)

D

[1] Or so I hope they do...[2]
[2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3]
[3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4]
[4] HI SHERRY!!!  ;o)

The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we
behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt

-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1]

[1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much
pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm
Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show.
The Singing Pilgrims.


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


It's something the Pilgrims singed.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


What is a Compaq?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


hold on let me check

-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know


What does the network admin say?  Seriously what does it say in the Compaq
array config util?  

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: anyone know


I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive 
is not lit up  and the server is a compaq prol ml370.  Does this mean 
the hard drive failed. Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >