RE: [Repeater-Builder] Ink Cartridge Refills

2003-11-24 Thread Richard
Personally I find it not worthwhile. Why risk damaging your printer by using
off brand ink or cartridges? I did it once and it leaked all over the inside
of my printer!
Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Chuck Kelsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 6:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Ink Cartridge Refills


Hello all you repeater builders.

I have a bit of an off-topic question that I'm sure someone here can help me
with.

I, for the first time, sent in a couple of empty printer ink cartridges to
be refilled. The black one came back defective. (Haven't tried the color
one.)

Can anyone give me their experiences, good or bad, with these refill
outfits?

I use this ink jet printer to print out repeater frequencies and to print
out construction documentation on repeater projects -- just in case you were
wondering how this problem relates to repeater building ;-)

Please reply directly to:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Chuck Kelsey
WB2EDV







Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/











 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic questions

2004-01-05 Thread Richard
Heheh... Once in a while I tell them what I'm looking for just so I can see
that priceless blank look! Actually one of then knew what silicon heat sink
compound was - I couldn't find it, and it turned out that they were out, but
another store nearby had it.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:11 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic questions


The two responses I've seen most often are the blank stares and we used
ta carry that.

Richard, N7TGB

Actually it's We've got questions, you've got answers.

Example: I walk into a RS store.  I'm asked can I help you find something?
I respond No thanks, I know what I'm looking for.  Happens all the time.

Bob NO6B






Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/











 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fuses on power cords

2004-01-08 Thread Richard
I use the blade type fuse holders and solder them in. I experience much less
voltage drop across them, resulting in more power out of the radio.
Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Rod Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fuses on power cords


I think we all agree that there's nothing wrong with having the fuses
there.

With that said, and we want to install fuses in the grounds of existing
radios without the fuses, is there a favorite fuse holder for in-line
use?  I've never seen a 3AG style in-line fuseholder like comes with
most radios as a stand-alone purchasable item.  It usually comes with a
short (most times inadequate) length of wire out each end, already
crimped to the buttons or clamps used for contact to the fuses.

The only other kind of in-line fuseholders I've seen is the kind that
use the new blade type automotive fuses.  I picked up one that is
designed to solderlessly connect to the wires in an
insulation-displacement style, but it looked really weak.  I wouldn't
trust it with a couple of amps, let alone what a high power radio would
need.

73 de N1FNE







Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/











 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] RLC-4 Controller Help

2004-03-21 Thread Richard
I'm reasonably familiar with both of those controllers, and the RLC-4
doesn't have the scheduler as the RLC-3 does, so that route is out. It
depends on what you want the DVR to do as to whether it is possible.  One
option would be to use an event trigger to run it, but those options are
pretty limited, and I wouldn't quite know how to go about using them,
because I've never messed with 'em. Besides, there are some you aren't
supposed to use. Another route would be to use one of the user timers, but
there again you'd need an event or an external input to start it, and it is
only one-shot.

One possible route would be to use one of the ID'rs to start the DVR, but
that could quickly become a pain unless you triggered it from the initial
ID. Then it would run the DVR only when the repeater ID's when it has been
idle for longer than ten minutes.

Hope this helps.
Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: w9mwq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RLC-4 Controller Help


Is anyone here well versed with the Link Communincations Controller
RLC-4 that could answer some questions regarding the DVR?  What I am
looking to find out is if there is a way to make the contoller send
a DVR message at any period of time without having to call it up.
Thanks for the help.

Mathew







Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link

2004-03-29 Thread Richard


-Original Message-
From: dy3lmk143_13mhz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:39 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link


I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50 
watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and 
no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have 
schematics on how to link repeaters? thanks





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link

2004-03-29 Thread Richard
I can't help you much with the connection method, but I can give you an
example of how much power is needed to link repeaters. My IRLP node, located
at my house, is linked to the repeater using small beam antennas over a
distance of about 12 miles. Even with an intervening hill, it is done using
only seven watts!

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: dy3lmk143_13mhz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:39 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link


I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50
watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and
no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have
schematics on how to link repeaters? thanks






Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-1000 schematic

2004-04-10 Thread Richard
I do. I'll sent it to you off list, because it's pretty large.
I can submit it for posting on the repeater-builder site; who can I send it
to?

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 9:43 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RC-1000 schematic


I'm trying to add a remote base to my RC-1000 but the controller won't send
any PTT. Anyone have a schematic for this model? Thanks,73,Lee,N3APP







Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Mast Materials

2004-04-30 Thread Richard
You just call 'em sir...
Richard

-Original Message-
From: Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:00 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Mast Materials


I wouldn't want to mess with someone who goes around bending 2 water pipe
all day long. 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] hello- i have a question

2004-05-08 Thread Richard





From 
reading your message, it's very difficult to determine what you're asking. I 
think you're wanting to share your DSL service with a friend at another 
location. You could probably do this with wi-fi if the distance isn't too 
greatand that would be the easiest and most elegant solution.I 
wouldn't recommend doing it without checking with your ISP first. Reason being, 
if (when?) they find out what you're doing, they'll probably (at the very least) 
disconnect you andbill you for service for two locations as far back as 
they think you've been doing it,unless you have some type of business 
account with them that allows that sort of thing.

Repeaters are mainly for voice communication.

Hope 
this helps.

Richard, N7TGB

  -Original Message-From: hello wellcom 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:46 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
  [Repeater-Builder] hello- i have a question
  please i want to know in a simple terms what is the repeater , my problem 
  is that i have a dsl connection for intenet and i want to give my 
  frindes links to use this dsl servicein a long distance as 200-700 meter 
  from me and i heared aboutthe repeater , is this repeatercan do 
  this function.
  thanks alot 
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Win 
  a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs 
  













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [[Repeater-Builder] Re: Response: Nick Berg]

2004-05-14 Thread Richard
I had to jump in with a quick comment: I'm a democrat too...

Terrorism has nothing to do with political party affiliation, but has
everything to do with our very survival.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: JOHN MACKEY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 12:04 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [[Repeater-Builder] Re: Response: Nick Berg]


Coy-

You and I have dis-agreed before, but today we are in TOTAL agreement.
I feel like a minority, I am a democrat who SUPPORTS the war in Iraq
 supported the initial Iraq invasion.

Coy Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 KEEP THIS IN MINDTHEY ARE WAITING  TO DO EXACTLY THE SAME THING
 TO EACH AND EVERYONE OF US, IF WE LET THEM.

 I'M STILL PISSED ABOUT 9/11  THIS IS JUST MORE INDICATION AS WHAT
 THEY WOULD DO TO US ALL.

 These people want us all to be under their control or be dead. They
 are teaching their children the same thing here in their schools. A
 local man was talking to a 10 year old girl from a local ISLOMIC
 school and during the conversation he was told if he didn't want to
 be Islomic then he would have to be killed.

 I'm SO VERRY SORRY for the family and the rest of us

 73
 COY


 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Lloyd M. Mitchell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  To the Berg Family,
 
  My condolences to you and your family.  We live in times of great
 sacrifice and your son gave the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom
 and security.
 
  From my family to yours, my sincere prayers for you during this
 time.
 
  Lloyd Mitchell
  Florence SC
 
  Maire Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Maire Company
  To: M. Bond
  Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:02 PM
  Subject: Fw: [WFHSG] Very Sad News-Nick Berg: From his father
 
 
  
  
Subject: [Tower-pro] Fw: Nick Berg: From his father
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
I just received this sad message from Nick Berg's father that
 I thought
I
should pass along to the Tower-pro mailing list.
   
John Hettish
   
   
  
 
 
 

   
   
- Original Message -
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:14 PM
Subject: Nick Berg: From his father
   
   
   
   
   
To the customers and friends of Nick Berg and Prometheus Towers
   
I am sorry to inform you that I just learned from the State
 Department
in
Baghdad, that my son, Nicholas E. Berg, was found lying dead
 along the
side
of a road near Baghdad. His body was discovered by a military
 convoy and
identified definitely. He will be flown to Kuwait, and from
 there to
Dover
Air Force Base. I have no further information at this time. If
 you have
unfinished business with Prometheus Towers, you may contact
 me, Michael
Berg, at 610-696-8873 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
   
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links






 Yahoo! Groups Links














Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Response: Nick Berg

2004-05-15 Thread Richard
You're right, this probably isn't the right venue, but it is something that
affects each and every American.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: Ken Arck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 6:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Response: Nick Berg


At 12:50 AM 5/15/2004 -, you wrote:

KEN, You may be right. But I think MY COUNTRY and Fellow AMERICANS
ARE MORE IMPORTANT than any ten repeaters.

---I'm in complete agreement with everything you say. I just don't believe
this is the proper venue for this thread.

Then again, I may be wrong

Ken

--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
Be sure to see our products at this year's Dayton Hamvention!
Repeater Builders spaces 707 through 710
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net





Yahoo! Groups Links















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [Tower-pro] Tech Tip of the Day

2004-06-04 Thread Richard
This has been circulating on the internet for many years.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 6:39 AM
To: Repeater Builder
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [Tower-pro] Tech Tip of the Day



  ... swipped from Tower-pro ... 

John Hettish wrote:
 
 Ripped off from another list and republished without attribution.  
 I'm a real outlaw.
 
 Make sure your IT guy finds out about this.  For you guys in the 
 field the IT guy is the one who is supposed to take care of the 
 computers at the office.  The most common phrase they utter is
 it can't be done.
 
 
 
  How to Replace Mouse Balls
 | Only IBM could do this...
 |
 | I don't know how they wrote this with a straight face. This was
 | a real memo sent out by a computer company (IBM) to its 
 | employees in all seriousness.
 |
 | Re:replacement of Mouse Balls.
 |
 | If a mouse fails to operate or should it perform erratically, it 
 | may need a ball replacement. Mouse balls are now available as
 | FRU (Field Replacement Units).
 |
 | Because of the delicate nature of this procedure, replacement of 
 | mouse balls should only be attempted by properly trained personnel.
 |
 | Before proceeding, determine the type of mouse balls by examining 
 | the underside of the mouse. Domestic balls will be larger and 
 | harder than foreign balls.
 |
 | Ball removal procedures differ depending upon the manufacturer of 
 | the mouse.
 |
 | Foreign balls can be removed using the pop off method.
 |
 | Domestic balls are removed by using the twist off method.
 |
 | Mouse balls are not usually static sensitive. However, excessive 
 | handling can result in sudden discharges.
 |
 | Upon completion of ball replacement, the mouse may be used 
 | immediately. It is recommended that each person have a pair of 
 | spare balls for maintaining optimum customer satisfaction.
 
 --

 John Hettish
 http://www.mt2w.com
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tower-pro
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Tower-Accidents
 http://www.tower-pro.net






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Astron Supply Help

2004-09-03 Thread Richard
Radio Shack sells it.
Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Mike WA6ILQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 12:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Astron Supply Help


At 08:40 AM 9/2/04, Tedd Doda, VE3TJD wrote:

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:35:29 -0400, Jim B. wrote:

 umm-heat sink grease (thermal compound) is not clear.

It can be. The common stuff is white, but I've seen
the clear variation on lots of industrial equipment
(DC-DC motor controllers for example) used for their
FET's and SCR's.

Do you, by chance, have a manufacturer's name?
product info (i.e. product name, part number)?
Is one known to work better then the other?

Mike WA6ILQ 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Cavity filters from aluminium beer barrels ?

2004-09-11 Thread Richard
I'm sure you'll get plenty of volunteers to help empty 'em!

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: dave_g7uzn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 2:19 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Cavity filters from aluminium beer barrels ?


Hi, Has anyone used beer barrels to make cavity filters ?
Any info/designs would be useful.Cheers Dave






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] radial tire static?

2004-11-19 Thread Richard

Awww... you took all the fun out of it - I was going to try it and see if it
works!

Richard ,N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: NØATH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 12:58 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] radial tire static?





Daron J. Wilson wrote:

Helium - we use this on almost every trip up to the repeater site.  We
find that we can load the truck down very heavily at sea level, and it
is often all we can do to keep it on the ground once we get up to about
6,000 feet.  It is a tremendous mileage booster, though we lost the
first truck when we unloaded at the repeater site and returned to find
the empty truck gone.  Perhaps it was stolen.


Actually helium is not always lighter than air. Am empty helium tank
trailer and tractor weighs about 62,000 pounds.
The same unit filled to capacity weighs about 62,800 pounds. By just
driving the vehicle you cannot tell if you are
 loaded or empty.

Dave // NØATH





Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Question for the list...

2004-11-20 Thread Richard





Another way is to use Windows picture and fax viewer (available in XP), 
select all of the JPGs for printing, then send 'em to the pdf driver. That's 
what I use.

Richard, N7TGB





  -Original Message-From: TGundo 2003 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:46 
  PMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: 
  [Repeater-Builder] Question for the list...
  Do a google search for a PDF printer driver, there are many free ones to 
  use. Throw all of your gifs and jpegs into Word and create you document. Then, 
  after installing a pdf printer program, you select the pdf printer as your 
  default printer and "print" your word doc. A box will come up that lets you 
  name the file and then it makes it a pdf. Easy as that, I use it at work all 
  the time. You can make pdf's out of any program that prints.
  
  Tom
  
  W9SRVMike WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  I've 
run into a situation, and thought I'd tap theassembled knowledge of the 
group...Is there a software package available that will 
letsomeone drag-and-drop JPG or GIF image filesand produce a single 
PDF file?The current situation is 27 individual page scansfrom a 
Motorola manual that needs to go intoone PDF file - but there will be 
more in the future.Mike WA6ILQYahoo! 
Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go 
to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/* To 
unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your 
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject 
to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?The all-new My Yahoo! - 
  Get yours free! 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ(was; Source for custom made cables)

2004-12-18 Thread Richard
And WHAT does this contribute to the list??
Richard

-Original Message-
From: Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer  Industrial)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 9:40 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder](was; Source for
custom made cables)



Daddy, are we there, yet?









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
attachment: winmail.dat

RE: [Repeater-Builder]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ(was; Source for custom made cables)

2004-12-18 Thread Richard
Don't know... I just roll my eyes and go to the next message. Or if I see a
whole bunch with the same subject, I just skip 'em all. I've been doing that
a lot recently... grin

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer  Industrial)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 10:25 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder](was; Source for
custom made cables)



Exactly my point. How long can this thread go on without adding anything
USEFUL to the original question ?

Kenneth Buley
Bullitt County DES CD-2
Bullitt County Red Cross/Certified ECRVDriver/Operator BC-6
Bullitt County ARES\RACES Coordinator KY4DES 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
attachment: winmail.dat

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Controllers

2004-12-25 Thread Richard

I'm not sure why it would take you hours to load and download the info -
what do you mean by that? I program several RLC4s and an RLC3 and yes, there
is a learning curve, but if you sit down for an hour or so with the manual
it isn't really all that bad.

The files I use to program the controllers contain anywhere from 10-30
macros, plus all the timers, IDs, command prefix, and the other stuff I put
in it, and it only takes three or four minutes to transfer it to the
controller.

Personally, I think the RLC controllers are extremely versatile and fairly
easy to program once you get the hang of it.

If you want, I can provide you with more assistance and some examples of
macro files that I have written.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: wa9ba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2004 10:14 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Controllers




Our club has owned a Link Club Controller for several years. It has
worked great but is a big pain in the !@@ to program. We recently
traded some things foir a Link RLC-4 controller but here we go
again, it is just different enough that you need to stop and read
the manual (very time consuming)!
What controllers do others use? Is there a controller that has
windows based software to program it? The Club has Windows software
but it takes hours to load and download the info!
What do you use and how easy is it to program?
Bill for AARO








Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Controllers

2004-12-30 Thread Richard

That's the way I do it. I did read out what was in the RLC3 I take care
of, after I took over maintaining it just to see what was in it. Turns out
that there were no macros at all, just the IDs and the courtesy tones were
set up. This is the same guy who said I'd never be able to figure out how to
program it because it was too complicated!

Since my file is fairly small, I just make changes to it and resend it the
next time I'm at the site. The relatively small size of my file makes it
easy to keep a complete copy on my laptop.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Steve Strobel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:04 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Controllers



At 01:41 PM 12/27/2004 -0500, you wrote:

Richard wrote:

  I'm not sure why it would take you hours to load and download the
info -
  what do you mean by that? I program several RLC4s and an RLC3 and yes,
 there
  is a learning curve, but if you sit down for an hour or so with the
manual
  it isn't really all that bad.
 
  The files I use to program the controllers contain anywhere from 10-30
  macros, plus all the timers, IDs, command prefix, and the other stuff I
put
  in it, and it only takes three or four minutes to transfer it to the
  controller.

Pulling the programming out of the RLC-3 using the RS-232 port takes
several hours because of the slow baud rate used.
Only 10-30 macros? One guy printed out the programming he downloaded
from our clubs RLC-3-it made a stack of paper 2-3 inches thick!

What hasn't been said in this thread is that there is rarely, if ever, a
need to download all of that information.  The RLC-3 has literally
thousands of settings (making it extremely flexible, which is necessary for
a controller that can run eight repeaters independently at the same
time).  Those settings default to reasonable values, so you need only to
program an ID to get on the air.  The recommended way of setting it up is
to send only the CHANGES to the defaults, which takes only a few
minutes.  As long as you keep a file on your computer with a record of
those changes, there is no reason to download all of the settings from the
controller.  The download feature of the QuickStart software was added to
help those that had already programmed the controller via DTMF or inherited
a controller but no record of the programming and wanted to recover a copy
of the controller's settings.

Steve


---
Steve Strobel
Link Communications, Inc.
1035 Cerise Rd
Billings, MT 59101-7378
(406) 245-5002 ext 102
(406) 245-4889 (fax)
WWW: http://www.link-comm.com
MailTo:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Powering the Repeater With Marine Batteries

2005-01-22 Thread Richard

I've been doing some research into 3-mode battery chargers and the Ibex
units seem to fit the bill for my application. Using your link, I checked
their web site but they state they will not sell to individuals. Is this
true and is there a way around this?

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Tony King, W4ZT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:59 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Powering the Repeater With Marine
Batteries



One of the best ways to manage the charging of your batteries is to use
a multi-mode charger designed to properly charge and maintain them.
Ibex http://www.ibexmfg.com carries two 3 mode chargers that are very
well suited for the job.  If you look at their web page under the 12
volt chargers, the last one listed also has load shedding capability.
That means that not only does it charge the batteries, but you can power
the receiver, controller and exciter (but not the PA) through the load
shedding switch and when the battery voltage drops, it will shut
everything down; saving your batteries from total depletion.

Using a charger like this you will still need to isolate the output of
the AC power supply and the batteries.  I personally prefer to do this
with hard relay contacts so that you don't have voltage drop through a
diode to contend with. Which ever way you choose, spend a little extra
to charge the batteries correctly and they will last a very long time
and be there when you need them.

73, Tony W4ZT






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC 1000 Controller

2005-03-13 Thread Richard

If the controller gives you the beep indication that it accepted the
function change, then it is automatically saved. Are you
programming/changing the DTMF access code (function code) for a particular
function, or are you actually changing the parameter (such as the tail
beep)? The reason I ask is that in order to change either of the parameters
you mentioned, programming does not need to be enabled.

At any rate, if whatever you changed (and verified that it was indeed
changed) reverts to default after a power cycle, then it's possible there
may be a hardware problem in the controller. It is unlikely though, as they
are pretty bullet proof.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: va3vkk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:28 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RC 1000 Controller




When I program a function for example DTMF Muting enable/disable or
Tail beep program
Then disable controler codes all is OK but if I loss power it
reverts back to previous setting
This happens on new changes leading me to think I am missing a step
to save them. All others seem OK

VA3VKK
Kim









Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] IFR FM/AM-1200S Service Monitor Operating Manual

2005-03-27 Thread Richard





I've 
got a .pdf copy of it. Let me know if you want it.

Richard, N7TGB

  -Original Message-From: Doug Zastrow 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 5:22 
  AMTo: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
  [Repeater-Builder] IFR FM/AM-1200S Service Monitor Operating 
  Manual
  Anyone able to recommend a source for this 
  manual?
  
  Doug, WBØUPJ













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] IFR FM/AM-1200S Service Monitor Operating Manual

2005-03-27 Thread Richard





I had a few requests for it, so I'll post 
the link here. It's too big to Email (over 
9 Meg!), so I put it on my web site. The link is in the left column, bottom. One 
thing I'll mention is the the page order is messed up, soI ended up 
sending it to Kinko's online for them to print (single sided). I got it in the 
mail a few days later and spent about twenty minutes reordering the 
pages.

http://www.n7tgb.net/pages/radio/radio_resource.htm

Richard, N7TGB

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 7:54 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: 
  [Repeater-Builder] IFR FM/AM-1200S Service Monitor Operating 
  Manual
  I also have IFR 1200. Would appreciate .pdf copy.
  Thank you,
  Gary K2UQ
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] leak proof connector :)

2005-03-29 Thread Richard

That's what you get for hiring a plumber to install it! grin

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:22 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] leak proof connector :)



NOPE he HAD wrapped the threads like you would do to a water pipe...
causing no connection between the two connectors..
I guess the Subject of this email was incorect for the  text..


- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] leak proof connector :)




 Here is one to get you all going !
 
 I Had a guy install a antenna for me at one of my sites.
 Guess what he did when he hooked the jumper from the antenna to the
 hardline. ? ? ? ?
 The Guy Used teflon tape on the darn connectors.., it screwed me all up.

 Are you talking about that white non-adhesive stuff used for plumbing?
 And what did he do, wrap it on the actual threads of the connector, like
 two pieces of water pipe? Or over the top after it was assembled? The
 latter doesn't sound like it would be a problem, might even be a halfway
 decent idea-with the usual coax-seal or whatever over it, and real type
 33 or similar over that.
 The teflon tape would be an additional layer of protection, plus it
 would keep the coax-seal from sticking to the connector if/when removed.

 --
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL






 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.1 - Release Date: 3/23/2005




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]






Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna Specialists Antenna

2005-04-24 Thread Richard

Several hits on Google if you plug in the model number

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kg4ogn
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 5:09 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna Specialists Antenna




   Hello All,
 I just tore down a tower for someone and was given an antenna that
was sitting in their garage, did not get any specs on it. The label is
pretty much disintegrating but it says: Antenna Specialists, Made in
Ohio USA, Model Number ASPF 701. If anyone is familiar with this
antenna I would really appreicate it if I could ask you a few
questions. Thanks, 73.
   Alexander KG4OGN







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Dayton check list

2005-05-20 Thread Richard
Wow. Here in Reno, NV it is $2.49.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mch
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Dayton check list


For the record, $1.89 this morning, and $2.05 this afternoon. Imagine
that!

Joe M. (From DAYTON!)

Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer  Industrial) wrote:

 $1.86 for regular less than a mile from my home (for the last two
days) May have changed by the time I get home today, though.

 Kenneth Buley
 Bullitt County EMA Deputy Director CD-2
 Bullitt/Spencer Counties Red Cross ECRV Driver/Operator BC-6
 Bullitt County ARES/RACES Coordinator KY4DES

 Dante once said that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those
who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of no6b1
 Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 7:18 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Dayton check list

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Dave VanHorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  At 11:58 AM 5/18/2005, Ken Arck wrote:
 
  At 12:56 PM 5/18/2005 -0400, you wrote:
   Anyone taking bets on how high the gas prices will mysteriously raise
   for the weekend? I'm betting $2.37. Not that it's gouging or
 anything.
  
  ---Only $2.37? That's less than we're paying here in Oregon now!
 
  regular is hovering around $2 here.

 Highest on my trip so far was Shoshone, CA (near Death Valley).  $3.12
 for regular.

 Bob NO6B




 Yahoo! Groups Links










Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX

2005-05-21 Thread Richard
KiloHertz is the correct term!

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DCFluX
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:17 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX


Don't you mean, kiloCycles?

On 5/21/05, Kevin K. Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 --- Original Message ---
 From : Eric Lemmon[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent : 5/21/2005 4:05:15 PM
 To : Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Cc :
 Subject : RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX
 
  Alexander,
 
 The
 Sinclair Q-202G duplexer can barely make 85 dB when tuned on a network
 analyzer, so that's the major part of your desense problem. It's only a
 four-cavity duplexer, specified at 80 dB minimum isolation, so no amount
 of tuning is going to make it operate at an isolation above its design
 limit.

  While I don't disagree with what has been written, please realize that
 *most* commercial manufacturers 'rate' their highband/2M duplexer at 500
 kiloHertz split, not 600 kiloHertz where most amateur 2 meter repeaters
are
 operated.  This added frequency separation allows for the duplexer to
 provide more than the stated isolation at the 500 kiloHertz specification.

  The Wacom WP-641 is specified at 85 dB of isolation at a 500 kiloHertz
 split, but provides 93 dB of isolation at 600 kiloHertz.  The Sinclair
Q202G
 is similar in its factory specifications, and isolation provided.

  Kevin Custer







  
  Yahoo! Groups Links


 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX

2005-05-22 Thread Richard
Heh... Yes, it is interesting to have lived long enough to have seen
changes, but it is also good to go along with those changes instead of
staying firmly mired in the past. As I recall, the cycle-hertz change was
made sometime in the 60s.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Jarrett
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 5:47 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX


This has to be OT for this group but the proper conversion would be:

KiloCycles per Second = KiloHertz.

Unfortunately I'm old enough to remember time before KiloHertz . . . . or
maybe its fortunate I've lived to be that old.

Joe K5FOG

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 5/21/2005 at 9:32 PM DCFluX wrote:

I've got a kiloCycle to kiloHertz conversion table you can study.

On 5/21/05, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 KiloHertz is the correct term!

 Richard, N7TGB


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DCFluX
 Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:17 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX


 Don't you mean, kiloCycles?

 On 5/21/05, Kevin K. Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  --- Original Message ---
  From : Eric Lemmon[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent : 5/21/2005 4:05:15 PM
  To : Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Cc :
  Subject : RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX
  
   Alexander,
  
  The
  Sinclair Q-202G duplexer can barely make 85 dB when tuned on a network
  analyzer, so that's the major part of your desense problem. It's only
a
  four-cavity duplexer, specified at 80 dB minimum isolation, so no
amount
  of tuning is going to make it operate at an isolation above its design
  limit.
 
   While I don't disagree with what has been written, please realize that
  *most* commercial manufacturers 'rate' their highband/2M duplexer at
500
  kiloHertz split, not 600 kiloHertz where most amateur 2 meter repeaters
 are
  operated.  This added frequency separation allows for the duplexer to
  provide more than the stated isolation at the 500 kiloHertz
specification.
 
   The Wacom WP-641 is specified at 85 dB of isolation at a 500 kiloHertz
  split, but provides 93 dB of isolation at 600 kiloHertz.  The Sinclair
 Q202G
  is similar in its factory specifications, and isolation provided.
 
   Kevin Custer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
  To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





 Yahoo! Groups Links

















 Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links














Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: WEATHER RELATED STATIC

2005-06-10 Thread Richard
So if you are in the southern hemisphere, does it spin in a counterclockwise
direction? Funny... my wife grew up in tornado country and she never
mentioned that! grin

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Coy Hilton
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: WEATHER RELATED STATIC


I can't resist
Yea it causes the noise on the screen to spin around in a clock wise
direction. Oh hear's another trick that you can try with the same TV.
Try putting it on the Weather channel or the local news.   ;-)


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've heard stories of people in the tornado areas watching an
unused TV channel in their area.  Tornados supposedly generate noise
in the lower channels that you can see and identify as a tornado on TV.

 Joe

  Dave VanHorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hasn't tornado winds been documented to generate broadband RF noise
  primarily in the VHF region?







Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: WEATHER RELATED STATIC

2005-06-10 Thread Richard
Actually I was referring to the static on the screen, but I believe you're
right about the direction of spin in the hemispheres. So what does the
static on the TV do during a tornado event?

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of NØATH
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: WEATHER RELATED STATIC


As a matter of fact, it does - Or so I've always been told
Dave / NØATH

- Original Message -
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: WEATHER RELATED STATIC


So if you are in the southern hemisphere, does it spin in a counterclockwise
direction? Funny... my wife grew up in tornado country and she never
mentioned that! grin

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Coy Hilton
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: WEATHER RELATED STATIC


I can't resist
Yea it causes the noise on the screen to spin around in a clock wise
direction. Oh hear's another trick that you can try with the same TV.
Try putting it on the Weather channel or the local news.   ;-)


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've heard stories of people in the tornado areas watching an
unused TV channel in their area.  Tornados supposedly generate noise
in the lower channels that you can see and identify as a tornado on TV.

 Joe

  Dave VanHorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hasn't tornado winds been documented to generate broadband RF noise
  primarily in the VHF region?







Yahoo! Groups Links


















Yahoo! Groups Links










Yahoo! Groups Links


















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Anyone using the RS 12-249 WX Radio ?

2005-06-12 Thread Richard





Yes, 
I've noticed the trend for several years; it looks like they are going to be 
carrying mainly home entertainment and cell phones. It's a shame, really, but 
they have to go where the market is, and people just don't repair or build 
things anymore.

One 
point I agree with is that the store personnel have little knowledge of the 
merchandise they sell, except maybe for cell phones and batteries. This has been 
the case for many years. When I go to Radio Shack to buy a part,sometimes, 
when they ask, I'll tell them what I need it for (a repeater, two-way radio, 
etc),just for the satisfaction of seeing the confusedlooks or to 
impress them.

When 
Radio Shack stops selling parts, I'll have to mail order 
everything.


Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-From: 
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 
Behalf Of Mathew QuaifeSent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 1:35 
PMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: 
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Anyone using the RS 12-249 WX Radio 
?

  Bashing Radioshack won't help, I've been a manager of one for over 6 
  years. Most don't understand the inner workings of Radioshack. 
  They are a changing store, and it will be soon that they will not carry any 
  parts at all. I'm told consistantly that my store knows more than any 
  Radioshack for within 100 miles, but then I play with this stuff for 
  fun. As I said, Radioshack drives on one thing, and that is 
  Cellphones. From the inside, you now have the rest of the story.
  
  Mathew
  Coy Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I 
didn't say they have the RIGHT answers. I just said they have answers. I 
have known a few hams that worked at RS.--- In 
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Pugh 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: Or cell phones..  Joe 
wrote:   I've always liked:  You've Got 
Questions? We've got batteriesAt 04:53 PM 
6/10/2005 -0700, you wrote:Standard Radio 
Shaft motto?  You have questions? So do we.  
  
Yahoo! Groups 
Links  
 
Yahoo! Groups Links* To 
visit your group on the web, go 
to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/* To 
unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your 
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject 
to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  
  
  Discover Yahoo!Find restaurants, movies, travel  more fun for the 
  weekend. Check 
  it out! 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT Echolink, Win98 and WRT54G

2005-06-12 Thread Richard
Make sure the ports are forwarded to the computer that you are setting up.
Also, you can only have one Echolink node per ip address, so if it is still
running on your w2k computer, try closing that one.

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of georgiaskywarn
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:37 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT Echolink, Win98 and WRT54G


Sorry for the OT. I posted this to the Echolink Yahoogroups and am
waiting to be moderated. I really want to be online tonight for
testing...have other things to do than sit in front of the computer
all night ;-)

I cannot get Echolink up and running on this Win.98 computer.  No
problems on my Win 2000...but don't want to run it on that one.  It
fails on the troubleshooter with error 10060.  Is it the Win98
computer?  I think everything is set correctly in the router since one
computer works.  What am I over looking?
Thanks,
Robert









Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT Echolink, Win98 and WRT54G

2005-06-12 Thread Richard
Bummer... Wish I could offer more help, but without knowing what error 10060
indicates, it's hard to know where to go next. It's amazing, they have a
troubleshooting program available, but they don't give you the tools to
interpret the results!

I just did a google search (google is your friend!) and came up with these
hits; one of them is about firewalls, the other says the error indicates a
connectivity problem.

http://www.echolinker.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-606.html

and

http://echolinker.com/forums/showthread.php?t=709

Hope they help.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of georgiaskywarn
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 6:28 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT Echolink, Win98 and WRT54G


Yup...
Did that too
:-(
Robert


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Make sure the ports are forwarded to the computer that you are
setting up.
 Also, you can only have one Echolink node per ip address, so if it
is still
 running on your w2k computer, try closing that one.

 Richard, N7TGB


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of georgiaskywarn
 Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:37 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT Echolink, Win98 and WRT54G


 Sorry for the OT. I posted this to the Echolink Yahoogroups and am
 waiting to be moderated. I really want to be online tonight for
 testing...have other things to do than sit in front of the computer
 all night ;-)

 I cannot get Echolink up and running on this Win.98 computer.  No
 problems on my Win 2000...but don't want to run it on that one.  It
 fails on the troubleshooter with error 10060.  Is it the Win98
 computer?  I think everything is set correctly in the router since one
 computer works.  What am I over looking?
 Thanks,
 Robert









 Yahoo! Groups Links







Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Radio Shack electronic parts availability

2005-06-16 Thread Richard





It was 
(is?) the other way around, Radio Shack bought Allied.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kenneth 
  CookSent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:11 AMTo: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 
  Radio Shack electronic parts availability
  
  I think RS is or was 
  owned by Allied Electronics. The number is 
  1-800-433-5700
  The web sire is http://www.alliedelec.com/
  I got the catalog 
  from the Radio Shack web site last year.
  
  
  
  Kenneth P. Cook 
  Jr., 
  W8DZN
  Assistant Emergency 
  Coordinator for Crawford Co., Ohio
  ARRL VE, ARRL 
  Registered, Certified 
  Instructor/Examiner
  for ECOMM Levels I, II 
  and III.
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mathew QuaifeSent: Monday, June 13, 2005 10:16 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Radio 
  Shack electronic parts availability
  
  
  Most of this is going by the way side, they are 
  getting rid of it.
  
  
  
  Mathew
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  

Some 
people were talking about not being able to purchase parts from Radio Shack. 
RS a couple years ago was operating a commercial/industrial mail order 
service very much like Digiti Key etc. I have an RS Industrial catalog #C899 
and it offers quite a nice selection of components. I have not ordered 
within the last year so possibly things have changed, not sure but if you 
don't call CQ no one knows to answer you. Here are some phone numbers and 
info you might try. I believe its in the Dallas 
area.

1-800-291-6515Commercial 
Order Faxline

1-800-813-0087Consumer 
Order Faxline

1-800-442-7221Commercial 
Order Hotline (Com Sale 
Reps)

1-800-THE 
SHACKConsumer Order 
Hotline

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hope this 
helps...

Gary 
K2UQ





  __Do 
  You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] Email from a repeater

2005-06-16 Thread Richard
You might be thinking of Winlink2000, but it doesn't use repeaters, although
I guess it could. It is very much like packet, but you would set up a node,
which could be a laptop computer and a radio, and you can send/receive Email
using your Email client (like Outlook). What it does (as I understand), is
your message will hop from node to node until it finds one with an internet
connection, at which point it enters the internet.

I've been through a couple of lectures on winlink, but I still don't really
understand it, and I think the only way I could is to build one. That isn't
likely to happen soon, with all the irons I have in the fire now!

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Coy Hilton
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 4:56 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Email from a repeater


I have been hearing rumbelings about programs to allow retreeving
emails from or through repeaters. Does anyone know of it and can you
tell me where I can get it.
73
AC0Y







Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT-IFR 1100 Info?

2005-06-21 Thread Richard
You might try this guy; I bought an IFR1200S service manual from him, it was
in almost new condition.

lewis porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lew's Resale 3737 West Ferdinand StreetChicago, IL 60624Phone:
773-220-6000After 6PM: 773-638-4987Fax: 773-826-1845


Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 8:21 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT-IFR 1100 Info?


Hello,

I know this is a bit off topic but I need a service manual for a IFR 1100 S,
is there any message groups out there that may be able to help?  Looked all
over Yahoo and nada

Thanks,
Paul









Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT-IFR 1100 Info?

2005-06-22 Thread Richard
I have a .pdf copy of the operating manual for my IFR, and I had it printed
through Kinko's. It cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $20.

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:28 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT-IFR 1100 Info?


Joe,

I found that site, the manual is only a calibration manual, it will help but
is not really what I need.  I have the manual on CD, the purest in me wants
a hard copy.

Thanks,
Paul


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 5:06 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT-IFR 1100 Info?


 Or try:
http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/manuals.htm

There is a manual listed there for sale.

73, Joe, K1ike

 Glenn Little WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Paul,

 You might try [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This is the test equipment reflector that I found.

 73
 Glenn
 WB4UIV


 At 11:20 AM 06/21/05, you wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I know this is a bit off topic but I need a service manual for a IFR 1100
 S,
 is there any message groups out there that may be able to help?  Looked
 all
 over Yahoo and nada
 
 Thanks,
 Paul
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 







 Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links















Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur

2005-07-02 Thread Richard
Are you sure it isn't something caused by your service monitor? Have you
tried a different one, or is there anything else common to all three radios?

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Kelley
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 7:39 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur


So, no one here has ever run into this before?  Really??!

I found and tested a third radio... same problem.

To restate what the problem is:  Micor mobile UHF T34...
when running in the ham band transmit low / receive high
they are spurring 910 kHz above the transmit freq.  I don't
know what would happen if the frequencies were reversed.

443.750T 448.750R  spur at 444.660
444.000T 449.000R  spur at 444.910

It's not a power supply problem.  The spur is generated low
level, not in the PA (it's somewhere before or at the
exciter mixer, Q305).  It's not the offset oscillator.  No
amount of tuning or de-tuning various stages has any affect
on the spur.

Paul  N1BUG






Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car' due to ham antennas

2005-07-14 Thread Richard
Do you have a link to the article?

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mch
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:05 PM
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
due to ham antennas


This is slightly off topic, but I wanted everyone to be aware of what is
happening to a NC man who equipped his Chevy Caprice Classic with ham
antennas. He is now *charged* with driving a car that resembles a law
enforcement vehicle. Apparently that is a law in NC.

Details here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GovtVShams/

This will be my only post on the subject.
Please direct any discussion there.

This could be you if you have many antennas on your car (as many of us
do) and drive through NC in anything close to the same model car LE uses
(Caprice, Crown Vic, Intrepid, Impalla, Etc, or even any of the clones
such as Park Ave or anything based on the same frame).

Joe M.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Digest Number 3232

2005-07-14 Thread Richard
I agree... I read the article on some Ham related web site, and there wasn't
much useful information in it, so it's too bad we can't see the film at
eleven.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug W7FDF
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Digest Number 3232


YupI think there is more to this story then what is in text and
the photo of the hams vehicle [I found and read the article]. I
looked
closely for the light bar or anything red or blue attached to his
vehicle. So again, we are NOT getting the whole story.

Doug W7FDF

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, C Wayne Schuler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Could it be because he had some light bars as well as antennas
installed on the vehicle?  That'll get ya stopped.

 Wayne, AI9Q








Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] IOTA Switched Power Supply and Noise?

2005-07-17 Thread Richard
I bought one about six months or so ago, but I don't remember where. Google
should turn something up for you, that's how I found it.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bruce Nanney
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 4:49 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IOTA Switched Power Supply and Noise?


Does anybody have a web site to look at IOTA power supply? I need to find
some to replace my power supplies in the future.  Bruce KD4BOH.-
Original Message -
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IOTA Switched Power Supply and Noise?


I have one of the 75 amp supplies working at a remote
 site. We have not seen any noise from the unit, but
 our equipment is all VHF and UHF, haven't checked it
 down in HF, but at UHF we have seen no problems. We
 have 20 UHF RX's and 6 VHF and have not seen any
 degradation.

 These IOTA's run much cooler than the analog Astron's,
 and are much smaller. I will probably be changing out
 all of the Astrons to these in the next few years, as
 conditions warrant.

 Joe

 --- Nick Papadonis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Folks,

 I'm considering purchasing a 45A IOTA Switched Power
 supply to power a UHF Micor and am concerned about
 switch PS noise.

 Has anyone tried these supplies with UHF radios?  Is
 noise experienced?

 Insight greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

 --
 Nick KB1GZN  Boston, MA








 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
 http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/





 Yahoo! Groups Links















Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links

2005-07-26 Thread Richard





It might be the transmit 
time out timer in the Phoenix that is causing it to drop 
out.

Richard, 
N7TGB


  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Doug 
  BlizzardSent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 5:08 PMTo: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 
  GE Phoenix Radios as Links
  

  
I haveturned off all PLs to eliminate that possibility. 
I 'm having a conversation across the linkwhen suddenly the 
conversation is cut off. I hear the curtisoy tone on the hub 
repeater and it drops. If I had not heard him cut off, I would 
have thought that he unkeyed. The other person will still be talking , 
not until he unkeys will the link come back up. I have turned off 
all timers. 

There are three repeaters that link into a common hub. I ahve 
changed out one of the Phoenix radios with a Motorola M 120. I have not 
noticed that one acting up ( yet). Any thoughts?

Doug
N4HAJ

---Original 
Message---


From: wn1b8
Date: 07/26/05 
19:50:25
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 
[Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, 
"Doug Blizzard"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anyone out there using the GE Phoenix Mobiles in a linking 
system?
Im
 having a problem with link drop outs and have narrowed it down 
to
the
 link radio. I would like to hear from someone that has 
succesfully
 built a linking system using these radios.

 Thanks in advance

 Doug
 N4HAJ

Doug,

Can you be a bit more specific regarding the drop-outs? Are 
these
momentary (1 or 2 second) drop-outs or are they longer in 
duration?
Are you using CTCSS or just COR. Finally, when you experience a 
drop-
out, are you seeing a loss of TX or just audio through your 
system.

Scott Madison, WN1B








Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




  

  
  


 
  













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Beagle Virus

2005-07-26 Thread Richard





Heh... 
My ISP's virus filter caught it. No problem here at any rate, if they hadn't 
caught it, my antivirus would have.


Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-From: 
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 
Behalf Of Kevin CusterSent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:42 
PMTo: Joe; Repeater BuilderSubject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 
Beagle Virus
My email address is being spoofed. It's not me.If you 
  look at my name associated with this reply, you'll see I use my real name, 
  while the spoofer uses "Kuggie"You'll also note that the date is of a time 
  in the future, not the real time.[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a very old email 
  address, and it's likely time to retire itBTW: I use AVG and 
  keep it up to date...KevinJoe wrote: 
   You have the Beagle virus?  This was posted to the eflector with an atachment that has the beagle virus.

Joe
  
To: "Repeater-Builder" Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: "Kuggie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:08:24 +0330
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Hi

htmlbody


  
  :)
  

  













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links

2005-07-26 Thread Richard
If you don't program it, I believe it defaults to three minutes

I just checked my documentation and it says that Yes, No, or a single
digit time from 1 to 7 minutes may be entered. If Yes is entered, it
results in a Carrier Control Time of three minutes. I haven't tried it, but
entering No may (should?) disable the timer; the documentation doesn't
specifically mention it.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug Blizzard
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:24 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


I have purposely not programmed a software TOT, however some have
suggested that there is a hardware TOT. I have not been able to find
it. I would also like to know how you wire up the Phoenix.  I am
using
the pins on the back. Any thoughts?

Doug
N4HAJ

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, gervais fillion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 it depends also when it has been programm if the 3.00 minutes
timeout is
 there.
 if i remember by default it will have the 3.00 minutes
 this is for safety reason for the p.a.

 do it return on the air?

 we have a repeater system here ,pc controled and there are 8
phoenixs
 talking to each other

 these are good radio's

 73/s,gervais ve2ckn







Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Beagle Virus

2005-07-26 Thread Richard
I run Outlook and I like it! THppttt raspberry

grin

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Arck
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:49 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Beagle Virus


At 09:42 PM 7/26/2005 -0400, you wrote:

  My email address is being spoofed.  It's not me.
If you look at my name associated with this reply, you'll see I use my real
name, while the spoofer uses Kuggie
You'll also note that the date is of a time in the future, not the real
time.

---Anyone who runs MS Outlook without proper virus protection should be
drawn and quartered. Then again, anyone who runs MS Outlook... oh
nevermind

IMHO, of course :-)

Ken


--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
We offer complete Kenwood TKR repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net





Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links

2005-07-26 Thread Richard
Some additional thoughts...

On second thought, I don't think it would be a good idea to disable the
timer, rather set it for 6 or 7 minutes to protect the radio. I don't know
of a hardware timer, but there may well be one; I didn't see it mentioned in
the service manual, but I could have missed it. The service manual says the
timer defaults to one minute.

By the way, when you say you didn't program the CCT, did you leave the field
blank, or did you put No in it?

I use one for packet radio, and all the signals I need are on the rear
connectors. Do you need a pinout?


Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:01 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


If you don't program it, I believe it defaults to three minutes

I just checked my documentation and it says that Yes, No, or a single
digit time from 1 to 7 minutes may be entered. If Yes is entered, it
results in a Carrier Control Time of three minutes. I haven't tried it, but
entering No may (should?) disable the timer; the documentation doesn't
specifically mention it.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug Blizzard
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:24 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


I have purposely not programmed a software TOT, however some have
suggested that there is a hardware TOT. I have not been able to find
it. I would also like to know how you wire up the Phoenix.  I am
using
the pins on the back. Any thoughts?

Doug
N4HAJ

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, gervais fillion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 it depends also when it has been programm if the 3.00 minutes
timeout is
 there.
 if i remember by default it will have the 3.00 minutes
 this is for safety reason for the p.a.

 do it return on the air?

 we have a repeater system here ,pc controled and there are 8
phoenixs
 talking to each other

 these are good radio's

 73/s,gervais ve2ckn







Yahoo! Groups Links

















Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links

2005-07-26 Thread Richard
You can get the recommended crimper for them that'll set you back in excess
of $80. Or, you can get an inexpensive crimper that will get you by, for
around $15 or $20. I'm not sure where you can get them, try an electronics
store or a tool outlet. Radio Shack sold them at one time, but I'm not sure
if they carry them now. Their new sales mantra is: We Used To Carry That.

Or, if all else fails, you can crimp 'em with a pair of needle nose pliers.
Bend one ear over the wire, then the other, making sure the crimp is small
enough so that the pin will fit in the connector housing. Then you'll need
to solder the wire to the pin, as it won't be reliable otherwise.

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ronny Julian
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:08 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


I found the connectors for the back of this radio with the pins installed.
What's the best way to crimp them?  Is there a tool for this and where can I
get one?

A good friend programmed mine.  144.390 and 145.030 for packet/APRS.  I need
to back off the power a bit but it works great!  He disabled the TOT on
mine.  Has not died yet.

Not a bad $5 ex-Forestry service radio.

- Original Message -
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 10:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


 Some additional thoughts...

 On second thought, I don't think it would be a good idea to disable the
 timer, rather set it for 6 or 7 minutes to protect the radio. I don't know
 of a hardware timer, but there may well be one; I didn't see it mentioned
in
 the service manual, but I could have missed it. The service manual says
the
 timer defaults to one minute.

 By the way, when you say you didn't program the CCT, did you leave the
field
 blank, or did you put No in it?

 I use one for packet radio, and all the signals I need are on the rear
 connectors. Do you need a pinout?


 Richard, N7TGB



 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
 Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:01 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


 If you don't program it, I believe it defaults to three minutes

 I just checked my documentation and it says that Yes, No, or a single
 digit time from 1 to 7 minutes may be entered. If Yes is entered, it
 results in a Carrier Control Time of three minutes. I haven't tried it,
but
 entering No may (should?) disable the timer; the documentation doesn't
 specifically mention it.

 Richard, N7TGB



 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug Blizzard
 Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:24 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Phoenix Radios as Links


 I have purposely not programmed a software TOT, however some have
 suggested that there is a hardware TOT. I have not been able to find
 it. I would also like to know how you wire up the Phoenix.  I am
 using
 the pins on the back. Any thoughts?

 Doug
 N4HAJ

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, gervais fillion
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  it depends also when it has been programm if the 3.00 minutes
 timeout is
  there.
  if i remember by default it will have the 3.00 minutes
  this is for safety reason for the p.a.
 
  do it return on the air?
 
  we have a repeater system here ,pc controled and there are 8
 phoenixs
  talking to each other
 
  these are good radio's
 
  73/s,gervais ve2ckn







 Yahoo! Groups Links

















 Yahoo! Groups Links

















 Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Why Linear For PS?

2005-08-06 Thread Richard
Heh I think you're opening a can of worms with your question!

My opinion is that if you get a good quality switcher (like a Samlex), it'll
work fine. Some of the cheaper ones can emit rf noise, and that is why some
people will not use them. Switchers are more energy efficient, lighter and
at least as reliable as a linear supply. If it works for you, then great!

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 10:20 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Why Linear For PS?


Hello Again,
   Is there any reason that Linear (such as Astron) Power Supplies
over Switching Supplies for Repeaters? The linears run hotter and are
very heavy to lug to the site where as switchers have similiar
capacity and are 10X lighter. I have been running a Samlex Switching
Supply for about seven months and no trouble. Why does everyone
worship the linear supplies?

Andy KC2GOW

445.125 PL_141.3
Staten Island,NY








Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] For Sale - OT, hopefully the end

2005-08-23 Thread Richard
Oh, ummm... isn't that the same as a comma? GRIN

Richard

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 6:59 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] For Sale - OT, hopefully the end


I never cease to be amazed by the number of people whom don't understand 
that the PERIOD is the important thing here and that it was in the correct 
place.

If you go to buy gasoline and it's $2.579 per gallon, do you really think 
it's two thousand five hundred and seventy nine dollars a gallon? Geez!

Sorry for the off-topic, but I couldn't stand it anymore.

Chuck



- Original Message - 
From: Jim McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] For Sale


 Don't worry yourself about it as it's sold anyway.

 Jim
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mark A. Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 19:13 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] For Sale


 $65 Grand or $65.00 ?

 yeouch!

 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] GMRS Interference with Canada

2005-11-27 Thread Richard
http://ftp.fcc.gov/oet/info/maps/canline/linea.html

And

http://ftp.fcc.gov/oet/info/maps/canline/


Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of cism211
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 5:04 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] GMRS Interference with Canada


The FCC GMRS license application refers to the prohibition of using four
GMRS frequencies
North of Line A and east of Line C.  Can someone help me find out where
those lines are?

Paul Yonge
Syracuse NY










Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my first repeater

2005-11-27 Thread Richard
Ok, I'll bite... what does TAS stand for?

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of nj902
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 7:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my first repeater


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, us_communications1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the
radios are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to
think of using the higer quality tube equipment. ...

___

Higher quality?  Just because they use tubes?  TAS lifetime subscriber?

But - to answer your question - you could build a tube type repeater -
it's your time to spend as you wish. 

Your best bet would be to search hamfests or go to the Dayton
Hamvention and try to find a copy of the Radio Amateur's F-M Repeater
Handbook by Ken W. Sessions, c.1969, and any other period literature
you can find. Once upon a time hams did make repeaters out of the tube
type stuff when it was plentiful on the surplus market in the 1960's.

You might also check with your local two-way radio shops - it's just
possible they may have an old tube type repeater sitting around that
hasn't made it to the landfill yet.  If not that - they might have
some old manuals for tube type repeaters.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Vanity call resumes

2005-12-25 Thread Richard





Heh... 
Withemphasis on Non_Profit!

Richard

  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark A. 
  HolmanSent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 12:29 PMTo: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 
  Vanity call resumesYep Cha-Ching 
  ! and TNX 4 doing biz with Uncle Sam ! gotta remember UR suppourting the 
  biggest non profit org in da world :-) 
  N9WYS wrote: 
  




If you go onto the 
FCC's ULS page and drill down to the amateur licensing, there are the steps 
there to apply for a vanity call... It's not that difficult - I did it 
for a club I belong to. (Will County Emergency Management Amateurs - 
we got call sign W9WIL.) 
The main thing the FCC is interested in is your . 
J

Mark - 
N9WYS













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: interface to shut off a radio on temporaly base

2006-01-03 Thread Richard





I 
agree... When I was a board tech,we would wash boards in a tub 
oforganic cleaner. I can't rememberthe name of it, 
butwenicknamed it green death because it was pretty hard onour 
skin. After letting the board soak in it a while,we'd then take it out 
rinse it well, then dry it with compressed air. Never cleaned monitor boards 
though, I was nervous about getting water in or under the 
flyback.

Richard, N7TGB




-Original Message-From: 
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 
Behalf Of Fred TownsendSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:18 
AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: 
[Repeater-Builder] Re: interface to shut off a radio on temporaly 
base
I'd like to second Skipps comments and add one of my own. At the 
  factory we used ordinary dish washers (until we got the commercial washers) to 
  clean PC boards. Most components are water safe. Exceptions, are non 
  hermetic parts like switches and transformers; things with paper or bakalite 
  coil forms. Spic and Span is a little harsh. For general cleaning, 
  including automatic dish washers, useArm and Hammer baking soda. If 
  you think someone has used an acid flux (sometimes necessary to solder nickel 
  or steel) clean with ammonia before the baking soda. Finally if you have rosin 
  flux isopropyl alcohol works well. Don't use rubbing alcohol (contains water) 
  or use alcohol in the automatic dish washer (it will burn).Fred 
  AE6QL
  













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - funny interference story

2006-01-11 Thread Richard
I concur... This is one of the most interesting groups I've had the pleasure
of participating in. Indeed, a rare collection of talent in this group.

Fairly new to the world of repeaters,

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony VE6MVP
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:32 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - funny interference story


At 03:58 PM 2006-01-11 -0600, you wrote:

 Very Interesting

Agreed.   Anecdotes like this are always worth reading.

An excellent means of passing knowledge down the generations.

Tony (a newbieish ham)






Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread Richard
I just wonder if the guy was dumb enough to think he wouldn't get caught!

Richard


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave VanHorn
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:36 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interference story



 Do you think some Motorola employee got a ticket sometime?

You know.. If that story is true, I'd call that one criminal. 








 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] first-of-its kind device

2006-01-13 Thread Richard





Reminds me of those $600 hammers the Government buys!

Richard


  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  DickSent: Friday, January 13, 2006 8:43 AMTo: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 
  first-of-its kind device
  Your tax dollars at work to reinvent the wheel
  
  Dick
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: KA9QJG 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: 12 January, 2006 21:28
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] first-of-its kind device
  
  
  This is 
  2006, is this Not a Repeater or am I missing something here, --- first-of-its 
  kind device -- Duh. 
  
  Happy 
  Repeater Building 
  
  De Don 
  KA9QJG 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From a 
  newsletter called "Government Security"
  
  
  
  Connecticut emergency responders create communication device 
  
  Connecticut emergency responders say they have created a 
  first-of-its kind device that will allow rescue crews from several agencies to 
  talk to each other at the scene of an emergency or disaster, The Associated 
  Press reports.
  If the 
  invention proves successful, it could help clear one of the biggest obstacles 
  Homeland security officials have been trying to overcome since the 2001 
  terrorist attacks: the inability to communication across radio 
  frequencies.
  Dubbed 
  STOC, for "on-Scene Tactical Operations Channel," the device combines a radio 
  and receiver into a single box that instantly receives a signal from one 
  frequency and sends it onto another frequency, officials 
  say.
  Neighboring towns typically handle rescue communications on 
  different radio frequencies, hindering communication in a crisis. Many 
  municipalities around the country are trying to solve the problem by buying 
  new radios to get regional agencies on one 
  frequency.
  "The 
  beauty of the device is, we don't have to buy more radios," says Wayne 
  Sandford, the state's deputy Homeland security 
  director.
  A 
  prototype has been developed, another is in the works and state officials have 
  allocated nearly $2.1 million to build a box for towns across the state, 
  Sandford says.
  Sandford 
  adds that he believes Connecticut is the first state in the nation to develop 
  such technology. He said the state should know within the next few months 
  whether it is successful.
  
  
  













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Web Site Down?

2006-01-27 Thread Richard
I can't get to it either.
Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Web Site Down?


Is the RB web site down?  For some reason I can not get to it tonight?

Jack
K6YC




 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] mods.dk (possiably OT)

2006-01-31 Thread Richard
Me too.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dick
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:23 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] mods.dk (possiably OT)


Works for me, Rich.

73,

Dick

- Original Message - 
From: Richard D. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 31 January, 2006 17:05
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] mods.dk (possiably OT)


I do not know how many files are on mods.dk but - there are over 2700
members of this group.  If each member were to download a file or two we
would have all of them.  The files could then be posted together elsewhere
and remain available for free.

Just a thought.

73  Rich
http://www.wa8dbw.ifip.com
- Original Message - 
From: Q [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] mods.dk (possiably OT)









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] controller question

2006-02-09 Thread Richard
If you have an IRLP node you can easily install Echolink on it, and then
they'll both use the same hardware.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 7:21 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] controller question




  Is there a repeater controller that I could use to tie an Echolink
and IRLP together with? One that doesn't cost an arm and a leg?


   Chris  KA7CJH








Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] controller question

2006-02-10 Thread Richard
There is a version of Echolink (called EchoIRLP) that runs on Linux.
Installed on an IRLP box, EchoIRLP utilizes the same hardware and a few of
IRLP's scripts.

I have both running on my node.

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim B.
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 8:34 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] controller question


Richard wrote:

 If you have an IRLP node you can easily install Echolink on it, and then
 they'll both use the same hardware.

 Richard, N7TGB

Execpt IRLP runs in Linux and Echolink runs in windows...
There is a bridge program out there, poke around the www.irlp.org site a
bit.
Or google.
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL






Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Failure to communicate.....

2006-02-17 Thread Richard
Or, as one local Ham advised another, turn up your power, your audio level
is low. The other ham was nearly full quieting into the repeater.

Richard, N7TGB

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 7:46 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Failure to communicate.


Or turn up your squelch, I can't hear you is another one!

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim B.
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 8:22 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Failure to communicate.


Bob M. wrote:

 Hams that already know everything...

 I think I've met a couple of those. They're the ones who tell you to
 scrape all that ugly protective copper coating off the 1/2 inch
 Heliax before you solder the center pin onto it.

 They're the ones that tell you All the connectors on that thing over
 there were loose, so I tightened them all up for you and then you
 find out that that thing was the hybrid ring duplexer on 2 meters,
 and the connectors were the tuning rods that are now all the way
 down into the cavities.

 They're the ones that tell you to put two 100 watt amplifiers in
 series so you get 200 watts to the antenna.

Ahh yes-the tinfirgudbudy crowd. Or as we like to call them, the
'light-bar brigade'.

Turn up your volume. I can't hear you...
|cP
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL






Yahoo! Groups Links














Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Virus infection!!!

2006-02-18 Thread Richard





Not 
someone, but a virus somewhere on somebody's computer did it. Unfortunately, 
there is really nothing thatcan be done.

I had 
a problem with Yahoogroups shutting off Email delivery of all my forum messages 
because my address was being spoofed somewhere and they were causing bounces 
(?). This was happening every couple of weeks, soI'd have to log onto 
Yahoogroupsand turn messages back on whenever I noticed that messages had 
stopped. I once sent a complaint message totheir customer service (now 
there's an oxymoron!), but that was a waste of time. Finally, after several 
months, the problem has tapered off.


Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  N9WYSSent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 8:11 AMTo: 
  'Kevin Custer'Cc: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Repeater-Builder] Virus 
  infection!!!Importance: High
  
  Kevin,
  
  Someone has spoofed your e-mail 
  address!! 
  I just received a message with the 
  subject You must see this video. It was infected with [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  Im sure you would 
  want to know this.
  
  73 de Mark  
  N9WYS













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Virus infection!!!

2006-02-18 Thread Richard





I 
alsokeep my virus definitions up to date. It isn't something you or your 
computer did that caused it; someone else's infected computer 
did.

Interesting... that is about the time I was having trouble with 
Yahoogroups. Wonder if they were having problems, or if there was a particular 
virus making the rounds causing it?

Richard, N7TGB



  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  N9WYSSent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 8:48 AMTo: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 
  Virus infection!!!
  
  Interesting 
  
  
  That probably 
  explains why I was having trouble with bouncing and Yahoo Groups kicking me 
  out of the various groups I subscribe to about 6 months ago. I 
  wonder how it happened, though, because I am vigilant to keep my virus 
  definitions up to date. Oh well.
  
  Thanks 
  Richard!
  Mark  
  N9WYS
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RichardSent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 10:39 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Virus 
  infection!!!
  
  
  Not someone, but a 
  virus somewhere on somebody's computer did it. Unfortunately, there is really 
  nothing thatcan be done.
  
  
  
  I had a problem with 
  Yahoogroups shutting off Email delivery of all my forum messages because my 
  address was being spoofed somewhere and they were causing bounces (?). This 
  was happening every couple of weeks, soI'd have to log onto 
  Yahoogroupsand turn messages back on whenever I noticed that messages 
  had stopped. I once sent a complaint message totheir customer service 
  (now there's an oxymoron!), but that was a waste of time. Finally, after 
  several months, the problem has tapered 
off.
  
  
  
  
  
  Richard, 
  N7TGB













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Virus infection!!!

2006-02-18 Thread Richard





Abandoning Outlook and Outlook Express is not the answer: having a 
topnotchantivirus program and keeping it up to date is. I've used Outlook 
for years with no virus problems.

Richard

  -Original Message-From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mike Morris 
  WA6ILQSent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 10:59 AMTo: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 
  Virus infection!!!At 08:40 AM 2/18/06, you wrote:
  "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = 
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" Someone has HTML 
  mode turned on.
  Well just 
a quick comment. Who in Peru doesn't like Kevin. Maybe wrong but the IP for 
the sender was through TELEFONICA.NET.PE which is shown to be Lima Peru. 
  SteveAll it means is that someone in Peru has Kevin's 
  email address and the repeater-builder group address in their address 
  book. A lot of these virii (yes, that's the plural of virus) pick 
  random names and destinations addresses and start sending.One more 
  reason to abandon Outlook Express and Outlook (the Microsoft mailers are 
  the world's biggest virus magnets) and use a real mailer. 
  Eudora is a free program and is one option.Mike WA6ILQ













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Decibel PDF files.

2006-03-19 Thread Richard
Those look like the ones I have on my web site.

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:19 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Decibel PDF files.


Before Andrew bought Decibel there was much on line 
pdf file information regarding the below list. I mentioned 
here on the group that members should download the 
information before that last file server went poof. 

The file numbers don't have a good decription so I 
took a moment to excel out what I was able to get. 
I can and will make these files available if you can't 
find them anywhere else. 

File Name/NumberFile Description

095060-000.pdf  DB4055, DB4056,DB4067,DB4068,DB4071,DB4072 Rack Mount
Duplexer. Installation and Tuning Instructions

095061-000.pdf  DB4057 and DB4058 150-174 Band Pass / Band Reject Rack
Mount Duplexers. Installation and Tuning Instructions

095062-000.pdf  DB4060 - DB4062 133-174 MHz Band Pass / Band Reject
Duplexer. Tuning Instructions

095064-000.pdf  DB4075W, DB4076W, DB4075Z, DB4076Z 404-512 MHz Band
Pass - Band Reject Duplexers. Tuning and Instllation Instructions

095065-000.pdf  DB4090 Band Pass / Band Reject Duplexer 806-960 MHz
Installation Instructions

095067-000.pdf  Notch Filters DB4104 (30-50 MHz), DB4140 (148-174),
DB4175 (450-470 MHz) Tuning Instructions

095068-000.pdf  Tuning Procedure for Two-Transmitter Combiners DB4351,
DB4381, DB4382, DB4384

095091-000.pdf  DB4022 and DB4029 (450-512 MHz and 806-960 MHz) Band
Pass / Band Reject Cavity. Tuning Instructions

095096-000.pdf  DB4307, DB4308, and DB4309 3dB Hybrid Couplers. Tuning
Instructions

095097-000.pdf  Dual Junction Tunable Isolators Field Tuning Instructions 

095102-000.pdf  Band Pass Cavity Filters Installation and Tuning
Instructions

095121-000.pdf  DB4350 and DB4360 Low Loss Combiners. Tuning Instructions

095123-000.pdf  DB4379 Low Loss Combiner. Tuning Instructions 

095158-000.pdf  Base Station Duplexers DB4036 (70-88 MHz); DB4044 and
DB4046 (148-174 MHz) Installation and Alignment Instructions

095231-000.pdf  DB4318H-2C 164-168.5 MHz Single Channel Filter and
Isolator. Tuning Instructions

095357-000.pdf  ACT27xxJ2 and DBNXTL27xx Transmitter Combiner. 5, 10,
15, 20-Channel Models. Installatin and Tuning Instructions


cheers, 

skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Decibel PDF files.

2006-03-20 Thread Richard
Probably they don't show up in a search because I put them up fairly
recently (couple of weeks ago) and they haven't been crawled yet. They are
there for all to use, and I will leave them there unless Andrews or someone
gripes. Some time ago I provided these files (and others) for inclusion on
the Repeater-Builder site, but I haven't seen them posted there.

The URL to the page featuring the articles we speak of:
http://www.n7tgb.net/pages/radio/radio_resource3.htm

Richard, N7TGB
www.n7tgb.net




-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:27 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Decibel PDF files.


And a quick specialized search of the web shows the
only on line place where some/all of the below files
are available is the Repeater Builder Web page:

http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/ant-sys-index.html

Someone from the group was looking for the Harmonic
Filter (following the Circulators) Tuning Instructions.

If you have Circulator Harmonic Filter Tuning Instructions
available, please consider sharing. Doesn't have to be
the Decibel Brand.

cheers,
skipp

 Before Andrew bought Decibel there was much on line
 pdf file information regarding the below list. I mentioned
 here on the group that members should download the
 information before that last file server went poof.

 The file numbers don't have a good decription so I
 took a moment to excel out what I was able to get.
 I can and will make these files available if you can't
 find them anywhere else.

 File Name/Number  File Description

 095060-000.pdfDB4055, DB4056,DB4067,DB4068,DB4071,DB4072 Rack Mount
 Duplexer. Installation and Tuning Instructions

 095061-000.pdfDB4057 and DB4058 150-174 Band Pass / Band Reject Rack
 Mount Duplexers. Installation and Tuning Instructions

 095062-000.pdfDB4060 - DB4062 133-174 MHz Band Pass / Band Reject
 Duplexer. Tuning Instructions

 095064-000.pdfDB4075W, DB4076W, DB4075Z, DB4076Z 404-512 MHz Band
 Pass - Band Reject Duplexers. Tuning and Instllation Instructions

 095065-000.pdfDB4090 Band Pass / Band Reject Duplexer 806-960 MHz
 Installation Instructions

 095067-000.pdfNotch Filters DB4104 (30-50 MHz), DB4140 (148-174),
 DB4175 (450-470 MHz) Tuning Instructions

 095068-000.pdfTuning Procedure for Two-Transmitter Combiners DB4351,
 DB4381, DB4382, DB4384

 095091-000.pdfDB4022 and DB4029 (450-512 MHz and 806-960 MHz) Band
 Pass / Band Reject Cavity. Tuning Instructions

 095096-000.pdfDB4307, DB4308, and DB4309 3dB Hybrid Couplers. Tuning
 Instructions

 095097-000.pdfDual Junction Tunable Isolators Field Tuning
Instructions

 095102-000.pdfBand Pass Cavity Filters Installation and Tuning
 Instructions

 095121-000.pdfDB4350 and DB4360 Low Loss Combiners. Tuning 
 Instructions

 095123-000.pdfDB4379 Low Loss Combiner. Tuning Instructions

 095158-000.pdfBase Station Duplexers DB4036 (70-88 MHz); DB4044 and
 DB4046 (148-174 MHz) Installation and Alignment Instructions

 095231-000.pdfDB4318H-2C 164-168.5 MHz Single Channel Filter and
 Isolator. Tuning Instructions

 095357-000.pdfACT27xxJ2 and DBNXTL27xx Transmitter Combiner. 5, 10,
 15, 20-Channel Models. Installatin and Tuning Instructions


 cheers,

 skipp
 skipp025 at yahoo.com
 www.radiowrench.com











Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?

2006-03-25 Thread Richard
At the Hamfest that takes place during our EmCommWest www.emcommwest.org,
admission and space rent is free! It is small compared to the others, but
the price is right.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 8:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?


Joe,

Wow, this is weird, I got your reply BEFORE I got the message back from me!
Wonder what's up with that!  I heard something about the owners of the arena
want to discontinue the Hamvention and sell the property or something like
that.  That was two years ago the last time I was at Dayton.

One other thing, our local club here in Azle, Texas is working on our
Hamfest for this year.  I think the tables are about $10.00 and all
tailgating and fleamarket areas can and may be inside this year!  Something
is wrong with these prices.

I was going to make the trip this year since I have inherited a now bankrupt
two way shop, don't know now.  I guess I will but I really don't like it!

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?


As I've told a number of people - it looks like they are trying to run it
into the ground. It's not dying fast enough for someone...

When you have THREE CARS in an entire section (the west one - farthest
from the arena) on Sunday, that says something.

I understand getting a reply from the committee is like pulling teeth this
year. In past years, confirmations were received the year before. I know
people who are STILL waiting on space confirmations and we're within two
months.

Joe M.

 Hello,

 I know this is off-topic but I don't know where to ask this question.  I
 have sent a email to the Hamfest folks by the way, who knows if they will
 respond.

 Has anyone looked at the space price listed on their website?  It is a
 graduated price scheme, the more spaces you buy the more it costs you!
 The
 price for 3 spaces is almost twice what 2 spaces costs!

 Why do they do that?  They seem to me to be the highest priced Hamfest,
 anyway this price scheme is just strange!  Who is getting rich there?
 Somebody must be!

 Paul








 Yahoo! Groups Links













Yahoo! Groups Links















Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?

2006-03-26 Thread Richard
EmCommWest and the Hamfest/fleamarket are held here in Reno; this year it
will be May 6  7th. There has been talk of it moving somewhere else after
this year, Las Vegas, perhaps.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?



  The originator of the now emcommwest fleamarket used to be fun.
 One year, I bought a whole series of RCA tube manuals for about
 $5 for the entire box.

  Another trip, I bought a roll of half inch Helaix for cheap.

  The fleamarket used to be held in Reno - but unattached to another
 event.  I don't have a clue as how well it is doing now.

  Neil - WA6KLA


 Original Message 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:42:23 -0800

At the Hamfest that takes place during our EmCommWest
www.emcommwest.org,
admission and space rent is free! It is small compared to the others,
but
the price is right.

Richard, N7TGB



-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 8:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?


Joe,

Wow, this is weird, I got your reply BEFORE I got the message back
from me!
Wonder what's up with that!  I heard something about the owners of
the arena
want to discontinue the Hamvention and sell the property or something
like
that.  That was two years ago the last time I was at Dayton.

One other thing, our local club here in Azle, Texas is working on our
Hamfest for this year.  I think the tables are about $10.00 and all
tailgating and fleamarket areas can and may be inside this year!
Something
is wrong with these prices.

I was going to make the trip this year since I have inherited a now
bankrupt
two way shop, don't know now.  I guess I will but I really don't like
it!

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT: Dayton Fleamarket space prices?


As I've told a number of people - it looks like they are trying to
run it
into the ground. It's not dying fast enough for someone...

When you have THREE CARS in an entire section (the west one -
farthest
from the arena) on Sunday, that says something.

I understand getting a reply from the committee is like pulling teeth
this
year. In past years, confirmations were received the year before. I
know
people who are STILL waiting on space confirmations and we're within
two
months.

Joe M.

 Hello,

 I know this is off-topic but I don't know where to ask this
question.  I
 have sent a email to the Hamfest folks by the way, who knows if
they will
 respond.

 Has anyone looked at the space price listed on their website?  It
is a
 graduated price scheme, the more spaces you buy the more it costs
you!
 The
 price for 3 spaces is almost twice what 2 spaces costs!

 Why do they do that?  They seem to me to be the highest priced
Hamfest,
 anyway this price scheme is just strange!  Who is getting rich
there?
 Somebody must be!

 Paul








 Yahoo! Groups Links













Yahoo! Groups Links















Yahoo! Groups Links

















Yahoo! Groups Links














Yahoo! Groups Links

















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Way OT, but a question...

2006-04-01 Thread Richard
That thought crossed my mind also, but it still looks like something
somebody built in their garage.

Richard, N7TGB


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Blasberg
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:06 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Way OT, but a question...


It may be a traffic preemption receiver for public safety vehicles
(police and fire) to be able to pass through an upcoming intersection
on a green light as opposed to approaching a red and having to
negotiate cross traffic.

Dan
KA8YPY


On Apr 1, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Mike Morris wrote:

 Some interesting boxes have been appearing on street lights in my area.

 Anybody know what they are?

 http://www.repeater-builder.com/wa6ilq/whatsthis.html
 (two photos totalling about 175KB)

 Mike WA6ILQ






 Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Sinclair Antennas

2006-05-24 Thread Richard
Has anyone lately been having quality issues with the Sinclair base
station/coliinear antennas over the past 5 or 6 years? Ever since they
abandoned their US mfg operations and moved their factory to Mexico...
changed their model numbers (for supposedly the same product)(dumb
move in my opinion)seems we have noticed some negative changes in
general quality. Internal harnesses have become intermittant, swaged
fittings come loose... all causing considerable IMD/desense and
general grief for commercial and amateur operators alike. When you
have repeater antennas on windblown icy mountaintops that are
basically inaccessable for repairs for 6 months of the year, you
cannot have this kind of thing happen...   

Anyone have experiences over the past few years? Particularly the 4
bay open dipole collinear variety of which we almost exclusivly use.

Richard
VA7AA 


 













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] YahooGroups format changes...

2006-06-08 Thread Richard
Those aren't advertisements, they are providing information about the group.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Pearl - W4ABC
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:16 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] YahooGroups format changes...


Some of you may have noticed a formatting change in the email that you're
now receiving from YahooGroups.  If you're seeing the same ugly
advertisements that many are seeing running down the right side of your
email - there's a fix...


Go to any group that you're a member of and find the name of the group in
the upper left hand corner.

Below that, you'll find the link - Edit Membership.  Click on it.  Scroll
down and find Message Preference and choose Traditional.

Your received email account will be updated so that it will no longer
include the new banner advertisements to the right of your email message or
the newer style ads at the bottom that cannot be deleted from your 'reply'.



Fraternally,

Jon Pearl - W4ABC
RB Moderator







Yahoo! Groups Links
















 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Read: [Repeater-Builder] Stuck cores

2006-12-06 Thread Richard
winmail.dat

RE: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code requirement today

2006-12-15 Thread Richard
My interpretation is that it will be effective 30 days after it is published
in the federal register, so the date hasn't been determined yet.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Schmidt
  Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping
code requirement today



  Question about this order    is it effective imidiately that the code
is no longer required for new licencing and the licenced techs (w/o code)
are now equal to tech + (with code) ?  OR is there an effective on  after
date?







  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code requirement today

2006-12-15 Thread Richard
Me too. I just ordered the general study guide.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Schmidt
  Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 10:25 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping
code requirement today



  Ahhh, ok.  Well, time to revise my Christmas list and get my nose in the
general and extra class written element books.

  Thanks

  Dave  /  N9NLU
  www.kmcg.org
  ( SWAP SHOP - Service manuals - Standard, Maxon, Uniden, RCA etc, one
lot - 6-7 postal mail bins -- $50 or offer / trade)




  On 12/16/06, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

My interpretation is that it will be effective 30 days after it is
published in the federal register, so the date hasn't been determined yet.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Schmidt
  Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO
dropping code requirement today



  Question about this order    is it effective imidiately that the
code is no longer required for new licencing and the licenced techs (w/o
code) are now equal to tech + (with code) ?  OR is there an effective on 
after date?














  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [Motorola-Metrum-Motrac-Motran-Mocom] Kellogg's FCC Sign Pact

2006-12-17 Thread Richard
Sure doesn't... this is the type of attitude that keeps people from joining
our hobby.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Bosshard (NU5D)
  Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 6:45 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [Motorola-Metrum-Motrac-Motran-Mocom]
Kellogg's  FCC Sign Pact


  Gentlemen,  does this promote our hobby?  Steve NU5D




  On 12/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  ... forwarded ... ;)


- Original Message -
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, December 17, 2006 10:00 am
Subject: [Motorola-Metrum-Motrac-Motran-Mocom] Kellogg's  FCC Sign Pact

 Washington D.C.-
 It was announced today that Kellogg's and the Federal
 Communications Commission have signed a pact to
 issue Amateur Radio Licenses on specially marked
 boxes of Corn Flakes.  In this unprecedented move
 the FCC believes this will not hurt amateur radio but
 allow all individuals to receive an amateur radio license
 without having to demonstrate any skills with the exception
 of being able to use a pair of scissors to cut out their
 operating permit from the breakfast cereal box.

 Kellogg's spokesperson commented that they were proud
 to have been selected by the government to be the issuer
 of licenses for amateur radio in the US and hope to soon
 make an agreement with other cereal loving countries.
 They also expect that will be issuing certificates of
 achievement for DXCF for confirmed contacts with 100 corn
 flakers.






Yahoo! Groups Links







  --
  Ham Radio Spoken Here.NU5D

  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [Motorola-Metrum-Motrac-Motran-Mocom] Kellogg's FCC Sign Pact

2006-12-18 Thread Richard
I admit I missed it, so I need new finals...
Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Laryn Lohman
  Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 9:13 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [Motorola-Metrum-Motrac-Motran-Mocom]
Kellogg's  FCC Sign Pact


  Anyone that misses the humor here needs new finals...

  Laryn K8TVZ

  
Washington D.C.-
It was announced today that Kellogg's and the Federal
Communications Commission have signed a pact to
issue Amateur Radio Licenses on specially marked
boxes of Corn Flakes. In this unprecedented move
the FCC believes this will not hurt amateur radio but
allow all individuals to receive an amateur radio license
without having to demonstrate any skills with the exception
of being able to use a pair of scissors to cut out their
operating permit from the breakfast cereal box.
   
Kellogg's spokesperson commented that they were proud
to have been selected by the government to be the issuer
of licenses for amateur radio in the US and hope to soon
make an agreement with other cereal loving countries.
They also expect that will be issuing certificates of
achievement for DXCF for confirmed contacts with 100 corn
flakers.
   
  



  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] IOTA Power Supplies

2007-01-07 Thread Richard
In my opinion, they are very good quality power supplies. I am using the
DLS-15 as a four stage charger for my home shack's batteries, and in the
year and a half I've owned it, I have had no problems at all.

Richard, N7TGB

  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
  Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 5:46 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] IOTA Power Supplies


  Has anybody had experience with switching power supplies from IOTA
  Engineering? I am looking at their DLS-90 90amp model. They seem to be
  worth the money. A lot cheaper than the fancy samlex supplies.

  Pros/Cons?

  Andy KC2GOW
  http://www.sirepeater.com



  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] MFJ_2040 Autopatch repeater controller

2007-01-09 Thread Richard
Heh... Same thing I found; Google is your friend. grin
Richard, N7TGB

  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Pugh
  Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:57 AM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] MFJ_2040 Autopatch repeater controller


  http://www.surplussales.com/Manuals/man_mfj.html

  Has it listed available for $10.. Mike

  w2drh wrote:

  
  
   Hi ALL
   I have an MFJ-2040 Autopatch repeater controller. I deperately need the
   manual for it. Can anyone please help? Thank you!
   Dave


  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Battery backup

2007-01-09 Thread Richard
I had a similar experience: I had a couple of deep cycle batteries in an
outdoor steel enclosure that I would charge periodically by connecting a
standard automotive charger. At times I would forget it was connected, so
eventually the batteries were cooked. After some research on the web, I
settled on an IOTA DLS-15 power supply with an IQ4 smart charge controller.
It is connected full time to the (new) batteries, and I only have to add
water every couple of months. I have not noted any kind of noise generated
by the charger. This setup works very well for me.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Schmidt
  Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 9:26 AM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Battery backup



  I have to agree with Dave. Using the proper charger or power supply for
keeping the batts up.  I have my batteries housed in a stainless steel
enclosure that is anchored into concrete outside my ham shack. I learned the
hard way about using the proper charger... I just tapped into my repeaters
25amp power supply to keep the batteries charged till I could make a
charging circuit ... a, big mistake. That charging circuit  - oops, I
forgot... about a month of operation,  I was working around the tower and
smelled what smelled like battery acid. Sure enough, I cooked both flooded
lead acid batteries and they were fuming acid vapor. Lucky the box is a
comercial built ss box.

  Now, after that incident, I have been using a marine (boat) smart
charger which automatically determines wether to charge or float. Since
battery chargers are, ummm, quite noisy and not all that nice on batteries
due to most of them only using a half wave recifier ( AC is not nice on
batteries ). I added a 25A bridge rectifier and added extra filtering which
is just a big Motorola mobile power filter block from the Micor dayz. It is
also isolated using some BIG diodes - like Dave's, the threaded case type
diodes which is bolted to a heatsink.

  The system is running well in this configuration. If using flooded type
batteries, do a monthly check on acid levels !   I recomend AGM batteries
( Absorbed Glass Mat ) or if that is a little pricy, get marine deep cycle
batteries - do not use automotive batteries unless you just absolutely half
to.

  Dave / N9NLU
  www.kmcg.org







  On 1/9/07, ve7ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have had good luck using a pair of diodes to isolate a power supply
from a charging circuit. I essentially have a Statpower 10amp battery
charger (specifically designed for the flooded cells I am using). The
batteries float on the charger voltage when the AC power is available.
The battery positive lead then feeds through a diode and joins
the positive power bus of my repeaters. Using a proper charger is the
most important part so you dont boil off the electrolyte in your
batteries.

The positive power bus is fed from a large GE power supply. The
positive lead from the power supply feeds through a diode to feed the
power bus.

The idea of using a diodes is to keep the higher voltage of the power
supply from passing current into the batteries when AC is available,
and vice versa when AC is off.

However, if you are using a high power PA or your repeater draws more
than about 20 AMPs on TX, you have to be careful of your choices of
diode. I use large feedthrough diodes, mounted on large heatsinks, but
on lower current draw you could get away with using a smaller bridge
rectifier mounted to an unpainted metal piece in your repeater cabinet
with some heatsink compound.

Dave Cameron
VE7LTD

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, wm5c [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi,

 New member here. Thanks for allowing me to join.
 Our club has acquired some large lead-acid 12v batteries we would
like
 to use to back up our repeater in emergency situations. Does anyone
 know of a good (but simple and inexpensive [we are a very small group
 in a very small town]) circuit to accomplish this? Any input would
be
 appreciated.

 Danny WM5C
 Heart Of Texas Ham Operators Group (HOTHOG)
 Brady, TX
 www.hothog.org







  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Switching Power Supply vs. Astron Etc.

2007-01-14 Thread Richard
That is perfectly understandable Plus, as someone else mentioned, the
switcher will save you money.

Richard, N7TGB


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mathew Quaife
  Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:22 AM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Switching Power Supply vs. Astron Etc.



  The ojective is not gain amperage, I have plenty of that.  This one is
available for free to me, and is brand new.  This would release the 70 amp
Astron for use back in the ham shack for all the HF equipment, and would
serve also as a standby.  Since the repeater is the only unit in this shack,
unless the noise was present on the repeater, there is nothing else to
suffer noise.  The answer to the question has come, however, the final
result will be today when I switch them out and see if it brings any noises
to the repeater.

  Mathew


  skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If the supply you are using is fine why change? Yes, you
 would gain some amperage capacity.

Relative example...
A room full of Motorola Repeater Stations in non constant
service costs about $30/month each to operate. Put the repeater
into lock to talk mode (IRLP or Echolink) and the energy cost
rises by almost a third (typical).

One of the energy soaks is the well designed and constructed
transformers within the repeater power supplies.

Replacing the hungry Motorhead Power Supplies cuts at least
1/2 off the power bill, which is much nicer when you're the one
having to pay it.

 However, switching supplies are inherently noisy. You
 could experience problems from these noises. I realize
 we are not talking about HF. But, it is possible to wind
 up with a problem you don't have now.

Many of the common 13.8 vdc switchers sold to the ham market
will hose up at least the 160 meter ham band no problem, which
is just above the am broadcast band I have on the shop when
XM is stale.

 If that 50 amp supply is fine, I see no advantage in the change.
 Dave

Cheers Dave,
skipp







--
  We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
  (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.

  


RE: [Repeater-Builder] A Monday Laugh

2007-03-08 Thread Richard
30 seconds is way too short. Sounds like someone put up a repeater but wants
to discourage it's use.
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:47 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] A Monday Laugh



At 3/8/2007 09:38, you wrote:

If you are giving a traffic report and it takes over 30 seconds, you are
not giving a report. You are having a conversation.

Incorrect. I was passing important information  the repeater timed out.

Bob NO6B



 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] A Monday Laugh

2007-03-08 Thread Richard
My opinion is that a repeater should be used a lot, that way it's known to
be reliable in case of emergency use. Plus, as you say, there'll be people
listening.
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] A Monday Laugh



At 3/8/2007 12:48, you wrote:
30 seconds is way too short. Sounds like someone put up a repeater but 
wants to discourage it's use.

Richard, N7TGB

The idea was to restrict traffic to only emergencies, public service, 
etc. Problem now is I never find anyone listening there to relay the 
traffic to the appropriate agency, so the original intent is rather 
diminished  the repeater gets very little use.

Bob NO6B



 


RE: [Repeater-Builder]Timeout Timers (Was: A Monday Laugh)

2007-03-08 Thread Richard
You're right, I remember now. senior moment My apologies!
 
Richard

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder]Timeout Timers (Was: A Monday Laugh)



Richard,

Please re-read my post. It is the USER radios that have a 30-second time
limit. The repeaters have three minutes, although they are commercial units
that can operate continuously. A user timeout will inform a long-winded
talker that his time has expired, with a tone from his speaker, while a
repeater timeout will never be noticed except by others.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:49 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] A Monday Laugh

30 seconds is way too short. Sounds like someone put up a repeater but wants
to discourage its use.

Richard, N7TGB



From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:no6b%40rptrlist.w6jpl.ampr.org w6jpl.ampr.org
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:47 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] A Monday Laugh

At 3/8/2007 09:38, you wrote:

If you are giving a traffic report and it takes over 30 seconds, you are
not giving a report. You are having a conversation.

Incorrect. I was passing important information  the repeater timed out.

Bob NO6B



 


RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language

2007-03-25 Thread Richard
I get so tired of people who complain about wasting bandwidth like it's
some precious commodity, such as beer.
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kupferschmidt
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:42 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language




Oh, come'on now.  What's this got to do with repeater buidling.  However was
the original post, do me a favor . . . get a  life!
 
This forum, and it's associated bandwidth, SHOULD NOT TOLERATE these
posts.!!
 
I suggest that you find an 11 meter band thread and go from there if you
want to rant and rave.
 
This is stupid.  We don't need people trying to figure out the english
language on this forum.
 
If you need to do, then I suggest that you go back to grade school and
re-learn what was taught to you when you were young.
 
Please, please  . . . . . . . let's get on to the subject of repeater
building.
 
Don, KD9PT
 

- Original Message - 
From: Fred  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flowers 
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:25 PM
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language


BECAUSE IT'S A PAIN IN THE ASS TO READ.  

 

Fred N4GER

Have a nice day.

 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language

 

i have always wondered why there are people out there that want to point out
grammatical or spelling or punctuation errors in stead of just reading the
post and either ignoreing it or deleting it instead of trying to show of
there mastery of the english language i for one don't care if you can't
spell or don't know how to use punctuation or if your participal is left
dangaling if this was a group devoted to the english language i could
understand that but it is repeater builders and as such i would expect that
the adivce be accurate and the names of the equipment be right but after
that who gives a rats *** about english language correctness 

 

In a message dated 3/25/2007 11:51:42 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Apparently there are many on this group who can't see that this topic was
never a matter of spelling nor is it appropriate for this group. I privately
replied to Paul with a request to please avoid the grammatical redundancies
he was using, that's it. No spelling complaints at all and he chose to bring
the whole private exchange to this group, a stupid move on his part and it's
a shame some can't see that but instead have to jump in and stir the pot.
This topic has nothing to do with the subject matter of this group so let's
get back to Repeater Builder topics. 
Gary 

I, myself, personally, think thee doth protest too much. Face it,  the pot
that was stirred was one that called the kettle black. What's even funnier
is that you are simply incorrect. The expression, I, myself, is not
redundant at all. The myself  lightens the gravity of an expression,
intentionally making it more tentative and less authoritative. It relieves
the listener of any sense of obligation to agree or, for that matter, to
disagree. 

 

 






  _  


AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at  http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF0002000339 AOL.com. 



!DSPAM:1016,460721bc523707424076780! 

 


RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language

2007-03-25 Thread Richard
I'll drink to that!
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kupferschmidt
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 8:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language




Being from South Eastern Wisconsin and the beer capitol of the world, I
agree.
 
I'll have another Miller Lite.
 
Care to join me?
 
Don, KD9PT
 

- Original Message - 
From: Richard mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language

I get so tired of people who complain about wasting bandwidth like it's
some precious commodity, such as beer.
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Kupferschmidt
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:42 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language





Oh, come'on now.  What's this got to do with repeater buidling.  However was
the original post, do me a favor . . . get a  life!
 
This forum, and it's associated bandwidth, SHOULD NOT TOLERATE these
posts.!!
 
I suggest that you find an 11 meter band thread and go from there if you
want to rant and rave.
 
This is stupid.  We don't need people trying to figure out the english
language on this forum.
 
If you need to do, then I suggest that you go back to grade school and
re-learn what was taught to you when you were young.
 
Please, please  . . . . . . . let's get on to the subject of repeater
building.
 
Don, KD9PT
 

- Original Message - 
From: Fred Flowers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:25 PM
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language


BECAUSE IT'S A PAIN IN THE ASS TO READ.  

 

Fred N4GER

Have a nice day.

 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Builder language

 

i have always wondered why there are people out there that want to point out
grammatical or spelling or punctuation errors in stead of just reading the
post and either ignoreing it or deleting it instead of trying to show of
there mastery of the english language i for one don't care if you can't
spell or don't know how to use punctuation or if your participal is left
dangaling if this was a group devoted to the english language i could
understand that but it is repeater builders and as such i would expect that
the adivce be accurate and the names of the equipment be right but after
that who gives a rats *** about english language correctness 

 

In a message dated 3/25/2007 11:51:42 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Apparently there are many on this group who can't see that this topic was
never a matter of spelling nor is it appropriate for this group. I privately
replied to Paul with a request to please avoid the grammatical redundancies
he was using, that's it. No spelling complaints at all and he chose to bring
the whole private exchange to this group, a stupid move on his part and it's
a shame some can't see that but instead have to jump in and stir the pot.
This topic has nothing to do with the subject matter of this group so let's
get back to Repeater Builder topics. 
Gary 

I, myself, personally, think thee doth protest too much. Face it,  the pot
that was stirred was one that called the kettle black. What's even funnier
is that you are simply incorrect. The expression, I, myself, is not
redundant at all. The myself  lightens the gravity of an expression,
intentionally making it more tentative and less authoritative. It relieves
the listener of any sense of obligation to agree or, for that matter, to
disagree. 

 

 






  _  


AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at  http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF0002000339 AOL.com. 



WBR460721bc523707424076780! 



!DSPAM:1016,46072ab6531195209328925! 

 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Update on License renewal

2007-04-16 Thread Richard
It is pretty straightforward these days, but it still intimidates some
people. I think a lot of the problem is that the Government has difficulty
explaining (and simplifying) things, so that puts some people off.
 
The last time I renewed I had to install Netscape so I could do it online,
as that was the only browser that would work (as stated by the FCC).
 
Richard, N7TGB
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kupferschmidt
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Update on License renewal




List members,
 
A couple of weeks ago I was looking for comments / information on how to
renew my father's ham license.  A number of you responded which I archived
them into a Word document for future reference.
 
I didn't have a chance to do anything with it until today.  After re-reading
all of the posts and then logging into fcc.gov, the license renewal took
less than 20 minutes to complete.  The process is simple:
 
1.  If you don't have an FRN (FCC Registration Number), click on the link
(left hand side on the home page) to get one.  If you do have one, proceed
to step 3.
 
2.  After obtaining an FRN, click on the link that associates the FRN to
your call sign.  Complete the page that does this.
 
3.  At this point you should be presented with a number of options, one
being to renew your license (with or without any modifications).  Since I
didn't have to change anything, I just clicked on renew with no
modifications.
 
4.  Complete the application and then click on the submit.  You also have
the option at this point to print out your application or save it to a .pdf
file.  I did both.
 
It was easy to do.  And the best part is that you don't have to pay anyone
else to do it -  it's free.
 
Thanks again to all that responded to my inquiry.
 
Don, KD9PT
 

 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Replacement of an older Repeater

2007-04-16 Thread Richard
Don't you just love it when an opportunity to use a line like that comes
along?
 
Richard

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:56 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Replacement of an older Repeater





Ken Arck wrote:

 ---Don't tell me that! I'm looking at a '94 Vette for my wife!

Damn good trade Sir! :-) Mike


 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Service Monitors

2007-04-21 Thread Richard
I did a brief Google search and found several hits. EBay has listings for
the operation manual/service manual on CD-ROM.
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:31 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Service Monitors




The service manual is impossible to find, saw one on Ebay go for almost 400
Bucks
 
Paul
 
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Overstreet
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Service Monitors


While we are on the subject of service monitors---
 
An IFR 1100S is available near here---but Im not familiar with this model.
 
Questions
 
Is there a complete unit description of this model on the Web somewhere?
 
What are the weak points?What should I look out for?
 
Many thanks,
 
Scott


Try the new PrairieNet toolbar its free: http://prairienet.mycitytoolbar.com



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.6/770 - Release Date: 4/20/2007
6:43 PM



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.6/770 - Release Date: 4/20/2007
6:43 PM



Try the new PrairieNet toolbar its free: http://prairienet.mycitytoolbar.com


 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Acronyms-a little OT

2007-07-08 Thread Richard
I've always known it as repair.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 11:58 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Acronyms-a little OT




In the original pristine FUBAR, did R stand for Repair or Recognition?
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/7/2007 9:18:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

And don't forget FUBAR - way worse than SNAFU.


 



  _  

See what's free at AOL.com http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF0002000503 . 

 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Acronyms-a little OT

2007-07-08 Thread Richard
I'm probably wrong, but I've always thought it is an Australian term that
has been adopted in this country.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 12:05 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Acronyms-a little OT




Where did the expression No Joy originate to indicate an unsuccessful
repair effort? 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/8/2007 7:19:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

--- In Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Readers who have a military background may also remember:

My favorite military acronym is NRTS, not for what it means (not
repairable this station), but how it was used. NRTS the damn thing
and lets go surfing. Which translates to take this piece of
equipment that we're suppose to fix out back and shoot it, put a
NRTS/battle damage tag on it and ship it back to the states. Made
for an easy work load.

No I wasn't in the military, but I worked with an ex-military Vietnam
era radio tech who had many colorful stories.

73's Skip WB6YMH 


 



  _  

See what's free at AOL.com http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF0002000503 . 

 


RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 4 meters

2007-07-29 Thread Richard
Exactly... We only sort of have that band.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kirby
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 5:01 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 4 meters



On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Ron Wright wrote:
 So concentrating on our other VHF and UHF bands is needed. I am 
 really surprised we still have 30 MHz on the 420-450 band.

One only need look at PAVE-PAWS

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:kris%40catonic.us us
* WAR IS PEACE * FREEDOM IS SLAVERY *
* IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH * KETCHUP IS *
* A VEGETABLE *



 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Tubes...?

2007-09-04 Thread Richard
Probably someone who is dumb enough to pay $300 for a pair of tubes isn't
going to notice that minor discrepancy. Sheeseh.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John J. Riddell
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 4:57 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Tubes...?




I wonder why the seller claims to have Phillips tubes when the picture
clearly shows Rogers tubes ?
Rogers made tubes in Toronto for over 50 years. Ted Rogers Sr invented the
batteryless radio
when he developed tubes that would work with an AC filament.
His Ham call was  9RB and his radio station later became CFRB...on the air
to-day ...still...1010 Khz
The RB part stands for Rogers Batteryless
 
For the full story see the Hammond Museum of radio web site.
www.hammondmuseumofradio.org
 
73 John VE3AMZ

- Original Message - 
From: Jesse Lloyd mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 6:14 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Oxygen Free and
stranded audio cables.

Yes,  unlike cheap imitations which give cubic audio quality, hahah.





On 9/3/07, Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] com
wrote: 


 If you really need a good chuckle (unless you threw out your tube
 stock recently) go to ebay and search for a 12ax7. For example

http://cgi.ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Matched-New-Pair-of-Rare-Philips-mC-12AX7-Tubes_W0QQite
mZ330162061283QQihZ014QQcategoryZ50598QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
com/Matched-New-Pair-of-Rare-Philips-mC-12AX7-Tubes_W0QQitemZ330162061283QQi
hZ014QQcategoryZ50598QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 
 I sure hope he packs them well!
 
 73's Skip WB6YMH


Well Skip I was surprised that you didn't snap them up at the -Buy It
Now- price, if only for their spherical audio quality. heheheheheh

Laryn K8TVZ








 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Yaesu Charger

2007-11-03 Thread Richard
I looked through the service manual for the VX-7R on the off chance that it
would have the charger schematic, but there was no mention of it.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 5:19 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Yaesu Charger



Looking for the schematic for a Yaesu /Vertex CD15A.

Charger is used with the Yaesu/Vertex VX-7R

I can't seem to find any information anywhere.

Can anyone help

Ralph, W7HSG



 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Bidding to Acquire Control ofVertex Standard (Yaesu)

2007-11-05 Thread Richard
Another reason is that the larger company wants the technology that the
smaller company possesses
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Bargmann
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 5:47 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Bidding to Acquire Control ofVertex
Standard (Yaesu)



* 
Whenever a large company aquires a smaller company they are usually
after one of two things, aquiring a presence in an established market,
or squashing competition.

At least right now I have all the Yaesu gear I need, I just hope it
keeps working.

73, de Nate 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Recent Activity

*   

 12
New
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJlM2M3amI
yBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNDE2OARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUwNjMxMDgEc2VjA3Z0bARzbGs
Ddm1icnMEc3RpbWUDMTE5NDMxMzYzOA-- Members
*   

 1
New
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/spnew;_ylc=X3oDMTJlajRzZ2hiB
F9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNDE2OARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUwNjMxMDgEc2VjA3Z0bARzbGsDd
nBob3QEc3RpbWUDMTE5NDMxMzYzOA-- Photos
*   

 1
New
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJmczlicWV0B
F9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNDE2OARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUwNjMxMDgEc2VjA3Z0bARzbGsDd
mxpbmtzBHN0aW1lAzExOTQzMTM2Mzg- Links

Visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder;_ylc=X3oDMTJkcmtxNDl0BF9TAzk
3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNDE2OARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUwNjMxMDgEc2VjA3Z0bARzbGsDdmdocAR
zdGltZQMxMTk0MzEzNjM4 Your Group 
Holidays with Y!

Fly
http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12j4gucl3/M=625000.11723957.12194044.8674578/D=
groups/S=1705063108:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1194320838/A=5008828/R=0/SIG=11oo17jiv/*h
ttp://promotions.yahoo.com/holidayjetsetter/index.php home on us.

Win free airline

tickets now.

Moderator Central

Get
http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12jlfn8af/M=493064.10729651.1142.8674578/D=
groups/S=1705063108:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1194320838/A=4936879/R=0/SIG=11e3tma2a/*h
ttp://new.groups.yahoo.com/moderatorcentral answers to

your questions about

running Y! Groups.

Wellness Spot

on
http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12k1tik7b/M=493064.11674772.12153082.11322765/D
=groups/S=1705063108:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1194320838/A=4990212/R=0/SIG=11d53kq3t/*
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/curves/ Yahoo! Groups

A resource for living

the Curves lifestyle.

.
 
http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=104168/grpspId=1705063108/msgId=
76542/stime=1194313638/nc1=5008828/nc2=4936879/nc3=4990212 
 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola/Yaesu

2007-11-06 Thread Richard
Somebody already posted this 14 hours ago.
 
Richard, N7TGB

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Reese
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:53 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola/Yaesu




Received this from a friend that works for Motorola.
 
Motorola USA has announced its intention to launch a tender offer to
acquire a controlling interest in Vertex Standard Co, Ltd. Vertex
Standard is the parent company of Yaesu. Motorola will own 80
percent of Vertex Standard; Tokogiken, a privately held Japanese
company, controlled by current president and CEO of Vertex Standard
Jun Hasegawa, will retain 20 percent, forming a joint venture. The
total purchase price for 80 percent of the outstanding shares on a
fully diluted basis will be approximately US $108 million.

R. D. Reese
WA8DBW

 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem

2007-11-09 Thread Richard
I've never heard of Eproms having a finite lifetime, although I will readily
admit to not being completely knowledgeable of them. There may be
differences in quality, the cheaper ones are simply failing, or maybe the
Eprom wasn't burned properly.
 
An Eprom's principal enemy is static electricity. After being exposed to it,
the damage may be immediately apparent, or it may take days, weeks or years
before manifesting itself. This is the voice of experience, but that is
another story...
 
On the other hand, your report of it starting to work properly when you
power cycled it indicates to me that you had a possible data corruption in
RAM that was cleared out by rebooting. That is very common with
microprocessor based equipment.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:39 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem



Bryon,

Thanks for the response. I hadn't thought about EEPROMS having a finite
lifetime- but it sounds reasonable. This RC-96 controller has been in
service for just over 16 years.

I should have mentioned that, once I disconnected the power to the RC-96 and
reconnected it about 20 seconds later, it responded with the expected
Controller Ready announcement. It seemed to be behaving well at that
point, but I took it back to the shop for forensic investigation anyway,
rather than walk away thinking everything was okay.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bryon Jeffers KØBSJ
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:22 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem

Eric,

Eproms are only good for so long.. One or more is starting to lose its 
stored/burned bits. I have not had this happen to an ACC controller but 
other older eprom devices. The last item had a Eprom about ten years old 
in it when it started to go crazy...

Hope this helps!

Bryon KØBSJ

Eric Lemmon wrote:
 One of the repeaters I maintain has been working perfectly for almost a
year
 since its last checkup. It is a 6m repeater that has a link to several
 other 6m repeaters, and is controlled by an ACC RC-96 controller. It is
 powered from a very large commercial UPS that ensures no-break power.

 One evening, the controller went berserk, for no apparent reason. It
 started transmitting a string of Morse characters on both the primary and
 secondary ports: dit dah dit ... dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dah
 ... for about two minutes. It would then be quiet on both ports for about
 30 seconds, and would then repeat. During the brief silent periods, the
 repeater would operate as a repeater, but the Morse string muted any other
 audio, once it began. The controller would not respond to my DTMF commands
 on either the primary or secondary ports. To make matters worse, the
 telephone line that gives me backup control to knock down the repeater was
 dead at the hilltop end! I had to make a hasty trip to the mountaintop
site
 to take the beast off the air.

 As a result of this experience, I am adding a dedicated UHF control link
to
 give me positive control of the repeater.

 Has anyone else had a similar problem with the RC-96 controller? Note that
 there is no lithium or similar memory battery inside the box that might go
 bad. Oddball malfunctions like this can add more gray hairs than I want!
 Any ideas, case histories, or suggestions will be appreciated.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY






 
 Yahoo! Groups Links






 



 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem

2007-11-09 Thread Richard
I knew it, it's those space aliens!
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith McQueen
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem




RAM memory is not 100% especially as it ages.  Stray gamma rays can corrupt
RAM.  It's rare here deep in the atmosphere, but it does happen.  Satellites
have to use hardened RAM for this reason (or as in the case of the HAM
microsats, special software routines that continually watch for and correct
errors in the RAM memory).  It is also possible for RF to affect
microprocessor circuitry.  Again, if properly constructed and bypassed, this
is rare.  In older circuitry, the bypass capacitors that shunt noise to
ground in computer circuitry, age and lose their efficacy.   I'd say if
there were no problems before and a reset seems to fix it, give the poor old
beast another chance.  If the problems re-occur, start looking for aged
caps, aged EPROMS etc.
 
 
Keith McQueen
801-224-9460
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:39 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem



Bryon,

Thanks for the response. I hadn't thought about EEPROMS having a finite
lifetime- but it sounds reasonable. This RC-96 controller has been in
service for just over 16 years.

I should have mentioned that, once I disconnected the power to the RC-96 and
reconnected it about 20 seconds later, it responded with the expected
Controller Ready announcement. It seemed to be behaving well at that
point, but I took it back to the shop for forensic investigation anyway,
rather than walk away thinking everything was okay.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bryon Jeffers KØBSJ
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:22 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem

Eric,

Eproms are only good for so long.. One or more is starting to lose its 
stored/burned bits. I have not had this happen to an ACC controller but 
other older eprom devices. The last item had a Eprom about ten years old 
in it when it started to go crazy...

Hope this helps!

Bryon KØBSJ

Eric Lemmon wrote:
 One of the repeaters I maintain has been working perfectly for almost a
year
 since its last checkup. It is a 6m repeater that has a link to several
 other 6m repeaters, and is controlled by an ACC RC-96 controller. It is
 powered from a very large commercial UPS that ensures no-break power.

 One evening, the controller went berserk, for no apparent reason. It
 started transmitting a string of Morse characters on both the primary and
 secondary ports: dit dah dit ... dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dah
 ... for about two minutes. It would then be quiet on both ports for about
 30 seconds, and would then repeat. During the brief silent periods, the
 repeater would operate as a repeater, but the Morse string muted any other
 audio, once it began. The controller would not respond to my DTMF commands
 on either the primary or secondary ports. To make matters worse, the
 telephone line that gives me backup control to knock down the repeater was
 dead at the hilltop end! I had to make a hasty trip to the mountaintop
site
 to take the beast off the air.

 As a result of this experience, I am adding a dedicated UHF control link
to
 give me positive control of the repeater.

 Has anyone else had a similar problem with the RC-96 controller? Note that
 there is no lithium or similar memory battery inside the box that might go
 bad. Oddball malfunctions like this can add more gray hairs than I want!
 Any ideas, case histories, or suggestions will be appreciated.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY






 
 Yahoo! Groups Links






 



 


RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem

2007-11-11 Thread Richard
The shelf life is typically ten years.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Morris WA6ILQ
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 12:29 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem



I don't have my Dallas Semi book handy, but if I remember correctly 
the 10 years
spec was 10 unpowered years - if the Smartwatch was in a device that 
was powered
up the battery was not being drained. But you still had to factor in 
the shelf life of the
internal coin cell.

At 03:44 AM 11/10/07, you wrote:
Eric,

As Kevin said if your 96 has one of the Dallas Smartwatch the 
battery in some of them had a life of 10 years. It was basically 
the shelf life of the battery.

Most of the Smartwatch's I've seen used a RAM as the memory rather 
than a EPROM. The battery maintained the memory when power was 
lost. The battery could power and maintain memory for the life of 
the battery which again was spec'd for 10 years although most often 
lasted 12-14 years. Kinda gets into the area of some rigs having 
their OS in battery backed RAM.

The Smartwatch was made by Dallas Semiconductor.

73, ron, n9ee/r




 From: Kevin Berlen, K9HX [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:k9hx%40arrl.net 
 Date: 2007/11/10 Sat AM 02:42:39 CST
 To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 Controller Problem

 
 What version of software is in your controller? With rev 5 of 
 thesoftware, a Dallas
 Smartwatch was added to the RC-96 to provide a real-time clock. As 
 Irecall, the
 smartwatch occupied one of the eprom sockets, and the affected 
 eprom wasplugged
 into a socket on top of the device. If yours has the smartwatch, 
 it maybe the culprit. 73.
 
 Kevin, K9HX
 
 
 At 10:10 PM 11/9/2007, you wrote:
 
 One of the repeaters I maintainhas been working perfectly for almost a
year
 since its last checkup. It is a 6m repeater that has a link toseveral
 other 6m repeaters, and is controlled by an ACC RC-96 controller. Itis
 powered from a very large commercial UPS that ensures no-breakpower.
 
 One evening, the controller went berserk, for no apparent reason. It
 started transmitting a string of Morse characters on both the primaryand
 secondary ports: dit dah dit ... dah dah dah dah dah dah dah dahdah dah
 ... for about two minutes. It would then be quiet on both ports forabout
 30 seconds, and would then repeat. During the brief silent periods,the
 repeater would operate as a repeater, but the Morse string muted anyother
 audio, once it began. The controller would not respond to my DTMFcommands
 on either the primary or secondary ports. To make matters worse, the
 telephone line that gives me backup control to knock down the repeaterwas
 dead at the hilltop end! I had to make a hasty trip to the
mountaintopsite
 to take the beast off the air.
 
 As a result of this experience, I am adding a dedicated UHF control
linkto
 give me positive control of the repeater.
 
 Has anyone else had a similar problem with the RC-96 controller? Notethat
 there is no lithium or similar memory battery inside the box that mightgo
 bad. Oddball malfunctions like this can add more gray hairs than Iwant!
 Any ideas, case histories, or suggestions will be appreciated.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1119 - Release 
 Date:11/8/2007 5:55 PM
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.27/1121 - Release Date: 
 11/9/2007 7:29 PM


Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.







Yahoo! Groups Links






 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone Repeaters

2007-11-21 Thread Richard
Here it is mostly the opposite. People will use a club owned, linked, high
level, wide coverage system before using a low level machine.  Of the 2m low
level machines, only one or two see limited use. There are many UHF machines
in the area, but they see almost no use.
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:52 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand
Alone Repeaters




On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Tony L. wrote:

 We're puzzled as to why people seem to shy away from most, but not 
 all,
 of the very wide coverage area systems. The busiest repeaters in our
 area seem to be the no frills stand alones. Are voice IDs, courtesy
 tones, and coverage footprints beyond a 25-mile radius just more than
 people can handle nowadays?

It's an interesting question you pose.

Here in Colorado, the Colorado Connection (www.colcon.org) does a 
great job maintaining a state-wide VHF linked system. People don't 
exactly shy away from it, but if there's a local standalone repeater 
they'll often choose that before the linked system. When they need 
it, they know its there -- would be the mentality I would ascribe to it.

My club (well, the one I found myself President of anyway!), the 
Colorado Repeater Association (www.w0cra.org - man I need to go update 
the website!) has a smaller-footprint linked VHF system for the Front 
Range with three sites, and it gets quite a bit of use -- but I 
generally think that's because of two things:

- We have a LOT of nets from other groups... Colorado QRP club, 
Colorado YL's, Edge of Space Sciences (EOSS), Colorado Statewide RACES 
Net, our own club Net, Rocky Mountain Monitoring Net, and a local ARES 
Net. This gives people a connection to others and a reason to be 
there -- on certain nights. I wouldn't say the folks in all those 
groups always monitor the system, however. They show up for their 
social group, and probably have the repeater in a memory channel and/ 
or even in a scanner... but many of the folks in those organizations 
have other clubs and repeaters they go home to, after Nets.

- At all other times, our club markets itself as a ragchew club. 
People are welcome to chat about whatever they like as long as they 
keep it clean and generally family-oriented.

- We also have plenty of toys. IRLP, EchoLink, Autopatch... about the 
only thing we haven't done is remote-base type equipment. All the 
sites have access to the toys in some fashion or another, even if not 
on all bands/repeaters.

We also have a number of standalone repeaters, at the same sites -- 
and two standalone repeaters at a very high site. The VHF high-site 
standalone repeater is constantly in use. The UHF high-site repeater 
gets a decent amount of use, but is quieter.

The two UHF's at the lower sites get almost no use at all, other than 
folks making calls for family members -- they've become the quiet 
calling repeaters, I guess. I lament that they get little use, since 
they work so well -- but they aren't a maintenance headache, and 
generally just keep running and running -- so I guess they'll be there 
for while.

Our 220 repeater is part of the VHF linked system, or it'd get little 
use. There's about four people who have rigs and use it. Other clubs 
in the area have excellent 220 repeaters that are virtually unused. 
It was installed back when Novices had voice privs on 220, and we 
could full-time link it so Novices could talk to their Tech, General, 
Advanced (remember those?) and Extra friends.

UHF around here is full of privately owned-operated machines scattered 
in-between the club systems, and after a while you learn that the 
owner(s) and a few friends always monitor certain systems, even if 
they're listening to something else on VHF. Most have coverage the 
equals or rivals the club systems, many on the same sites.

So - it's a mix. We're the only club with a multi-site linked system 
that I know of, besides the Statewide system. Right now, listening to 
the scanner, there's one of our elderly ham characters talking to 
one of our newer female members. He's always listening to the VHF 
linked system, and on there quite a bit between nets and other 
events. They've been talking on the Denver repeater for about an 
hour, and I've heard one or two other calls on the VHF high-site 
standalone today, but no traffic on the UHF's... pretty quiet for a 
day before a holiday. It'll pick up during drive-time, probably. The 
high-site UHF just popped up with a couple of our more active hams who 
were obviously both out and about, looking to meet up.

After having studied our users habits for years, I honestly can't say 
I understand it -- sometimes the linked system is totally dead, and 
other times it's going all day with traffic on multiple repeaters. 
The Boulder

  1   2   3   4   >