[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/ Collector #1926: add tests for both not-yet-encrypted and pre-encrypted passwords handed to '_doAddUser'.
Log message for revision 39545:
Collector #1926: add tests for both not-yet-encrypted and pre-encrypted
passwords handed to '_doAddUser'.
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
A Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/
A Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/__init__.py
A
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py
-=-
Modified:
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py
===
---
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py
2005-10-21 02:03:49 UTC (rev 39544)
+++
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py
2005-10-21 06:50:48 UTC (rev 39545)
@@ -206,7 +206,39 @@
except OverflowError:
assert 0, Raised overflow error erroneously
+def test__doAddUser_with_not_yet_encrypted_passwords(self):
+# See collector #1869 #1926
+from AccessControl.AuthEncoding import pw_validate
+USER_ID = 'not_yet_encrypted'
+PASSWORD = 'password'
+
+uf = UserFolder().__of__(self.app)
+uf.encrypt_passwords = True
+self.failIf(uf._isPasswordEncrypted(PASSWORD))
+
+uf._doAddUser(USER_ID, PASSWORD, [], [])
+user = uf.getUserById(USER_ID)
+self.failUnless(uf._isPasswordEncrypted(user.__))
+self.failUnless(pw_validate(user.__, PASSWORD))
+
+def test__doAddUser_with_preencrypted_passwords(self):
+# See collector #1869 #1926
+from AccessControl.AuthEncoding import pw_validate
+
+USER_ID = 'already_encrypted'
+PASSWORD = 'password'
+
+uf = UserFolder().__of__(self.app)
+uf.encrypt_passwords = True
+ENCRYPTED = uf._encryptPassword(PASSWORD)
+
+uf._doAddUser(USER_ID, ENCRYPTED, [], [])
+user = uf.getUserById(USER_ID)
+self.assertEqual(user.__, ENCRYPTED)
+self.failUnless(uf._isPasswordEncrypted(user.__))
+self.failUnless(pw_validate(user.__, PASSWORD))
+
class UserTests(unittest.TestCase):
def testGetUserName(self):
Modified: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
===
--- Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
2005-10-21 02:03:49 UTC (rev 39544)
+++ Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
2005-10-21 06:50:48 UTC (rev 39545)
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
'''
meta_type = 'ReStructuredText Document'
security = ClassSecurityInfo()
+_v_formatted = _v_warnings = None
def __init__(self, id,output_encoding=None,
input_encoding=None):
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@
self.title = id
self.stylesheet = 'default.css'
self.report_level = '2'
-self.source = self.formatted = ''
+self.source = ''
from reStructuredText import default_output_encoding, \
default_input_encoding
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@
'''
if REQUEST is not None:
REQUEST.RESPONSE.setHeader('content-type', 'text/html; charset=%s'
% self.output_encoding)
-return self.formatted
+return self.render()
security.declareProtected('View', 'source_txt')
def source_txt(self, REQUEST=None):
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@
return self._er(data, SUBMIT, dtpref_cols, dtpref_rows, REQUEST)
if data != self.source:
self.source = data
-self.render()
+self._clear_cache()
if REQUEST is not None:
message=Saved changes.
@@ -142,6 +143,7 @@
setCookie(dtpref_cols, cols, path='/', expires=e)
REQUEST.other.update({dtpref_cols:cols, dtpref_rows:rows})
return self.manage_main(self, REQUEST, __str__=self.quotedHTML(data))
+
security.declarePrivate('quotedHTML')
def quotedHTML(self,
text=None,
@@ -155,6 +157,18 @@
if text.find(re) = 0: text=name.join(text.split(re))
return text
+security.declarePrivate('_clear_cache')
+def _clear_cache(self):
+ Forget results of rendering.
+
+try:
+del self._v_formatted
+except AttributeError:
+pass
+try:
+del self._v_warnings
+except AttributeError:
+pass
# handle uploads too
security.declareProtected('Edit ReStructuredText', 'manage_upload')
@@ -165,7 +179,7 @@
self.source = file
else:
self.source = file.read()
-self.render()
+self._clear_cache()
if REQUEST is not None:
message=Saved changes.
@@ -175,57 +189,60 @@
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py Forward-port tests for collector #1926 from 2.8 branch.
Log message for revision 39547: Forward-port tests for collector #1926 from 2.8 branch. Changed: U Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py -=- Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py === --- Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py 2005-10-21 06:56:48 UTC (rev 39546) +++ Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/testUserFolder.py 2005-10-21 06:59:12 UTC (rev 39547) @@ -206,7 +206,39 @@ except OverflowError: assert 0, Raised overflow error erroneously +def test__doAddUser_with_not_yet_encrypted_passwords(self): +# See collector #1869 #1926 +from AccessControl.AuthEncoding import pw_validate +USER_ID = 'not_yet_encrypted' +PASSWORD = 'password' + +uf = UserFolder().__of__(self.app) +uf.encrypt_passwords = True +self.failIf(uf._isPasswordEncrypted(PASSWORD)) + +uf._doAddUser(USER_ID, PASSWORD, [], []) +user = uf.getUserById(USER_ID) +self.failUnless(uf._isPasswordEncrypted(user.__)) +self.failUnless(pw_validate(user.__, PASSWORD)) + +def test__doAddUser_with_preencrypted_passwords(self): +# See collector #1869 #1926 +from AccessControl.AuthEncoding import pw_validate + +USER_ID = 'already_encrypted' +PASSWORD = 'password' + +uf = UserFolder().__of__(self.app) +uf.encrypt_passwords = True +ENCRYPTED = uf._encryptPassword(PASSWORD) + +uf._doAddUser(USER_ID, ENCRYPTED, [], []) +user = uf.getUserById(USER_ID) +self.assertEqual(user.__, ENCRYPTED) +self.failUnless(uf._isPasswordEncrypted(user.__)) +self.failUnless(pw_validate(user.__, PASSWORD)) + class UserTests(unittest.TestCase): def testGetUserName(self): ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/ Collector #1927: Don't save rendered HTML / warnings as persistent attributes.
Log message for revision 39550:
Collector #1927: Don't save rendered HTML / warnings as persistent
attributes.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
A Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/
A Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/__init__.py
A
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt 2005-10-21 13:31:50 UTC
(rev 39549)
+++ Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt 2005-10-21 17:30:25 UTC
(rev 39550)
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
Bugs Fixed
+ - Collector #1927: Modified ZReST not to store rendered / warnings
+as persistent attributes, using volatile attributes instead as
+a cache.
+
- Collector #1926: fixed a typo in _doAddUser when password
encryption is enabled.
Modified: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
===
--- Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
2005-10-21 13:31:50 UTC (rev 39549)
+++ Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
2005-10-21 17:30:25 UTC (rev 39550)
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
'''
meta_type = 'ReStructuredText Document'
security = ClassSecurityInfo()
+_v_formatted = _v_warnings = None
def __init__(self, id,output_encoding=None,
input_encoding=None):
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@
self.title = id
self.stylesheet = 'default.css'
self.report_level = '2'
-self.source = self.formatted = ''
+self.source = ''
from reStructuredText import default_output_encoding, \
default_input_encoding
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@
'''
if REQUEST is not None:
REQUEST.RESPONSE.setHeader('content-type', 'text/html; charset=%s'
% self.output_encoding)
-return self.formatted
+return self.render()
security.declareProtected('View', 'source_txt')
def source_txt(self, REQUEST=None):
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@
return self._er(data, SUBMIT, dtpref_cols, dtpref_rows, REQUEST)
if data != self.source:
self.source = data
-self.render()
+self._clear_cache()
if REQUEST is not None:
message=Saved changes.
@@ -142,6 +143,7 @@
setCookie(dtpref_cols, cols, path='/', expires=e)
REQUEST.other.update({dtpref_cols:cols, dtpref_rows:rows})
return self.manage_main(self, REQUEST, __str__=self.quotedHTML(data))
+
security.declarePrivate('quotedHTML')
def quotedHTML(self,
text=None,
@@ -155,6 +157,18 @@
if text.find(re) = 0: text=name.join(text.split(re))
return text
+security.declarePrivate('_clear_cache')
+def _clear_cache(self):
+ Forget results of rendering.
+
+try:
+del self._v_formatted
+except AttributeError:
+pass
+try:
+del self._v_warnings
+except AttributeError:
+pass
# handle uploads too
security.declareProtected('Edit ReStructuredText', 'manage_upload')
@@ -165,7 +179,7 @@
self.source = file
else:
self.source = file.read()
-self.render()
+self._clear_cache()
if REQUEST is not None:
message=Saved changes.
@@ -175,57 +189,60 @@
def render(self):
''' Render the source to HTML
'''
-# format with strings
-pub = docutils.core.Publisher()
-pub.set_reader('standalone', None, 'restructuredtext')
-pub.set_writer('html')
+if self._v_formatted is None:
+# format with strings
+pub = docutils.core.Publisher()
+pub.set_reader('standalone', None, 'restructuredtext')
+pub.set_writer('html')
-# go with the defaults
-pub.get_settings()
+# go with the defaults
+pub.get_settings()
-# this is needed, but doesn't seem to do anything
-pub.settings._destination = ''
+# this is needed, but doesn't seem to do anything
+pub.settings._destination = ''
-# use the stylesheet chosen by the user
-pub.settings.stylesheet = self.stylesheet
+# use the stylesheet chosen by the user
+pub.settings.stylesheet = self.stylesheet
-# set the reporting level to something sane
-pub.settings.report_level = int(self.report_level)
+# set the reporting level to something sane
+pub.settings.report_level = int(self.report_level)
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ Forward-port fix for collector #1927 from 2.8 branch.
Log message for revision 39551:
Forward-port fix for collector #1927 from 2.8 branch.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
A Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py 2005-10-21 17:30:25 UTC
(rev 39550)
+++ Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZReST/ZReST.py 2005-10-21 17:46:13 UTC
(rev 39551)
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
'''
meta_type = 'ReStructuredText Document'
security = ClassSecurityInfo()
+_v_formatted = _v_warnings = None
def __init__(self, id,output_encoding=None,
input_encoding=None):
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@
self.title = id
self.stylesheet = 'default.css'
self.report_level = '2'
-self.source = self.formatted = ''
+self.source = ''
from reStructuredText import default_output_encoding, \
default_input_encoding
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@
'''
if REQUEST is not None:
REQUEST.RESPONSE.setHeader('content-type', 'text/html; charset=%s'
% self.output_encoding)
-return self.formatted
+return self.render()
security.declareProtected('View', 'source_txt')
def source_txt(self, REQUEST=None):
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@
return self._er(data, SUBMIT, dtpref_cols, dtpref_rows, REQUEST)
if data != self.source:
self.source = data
-self.render()
+self._clear_cache()
if REQUEST is not None:
message=Saved changes.
@@ -142,6 +143,7 @@
setCookie(dtpref_cols, cols, path='/', expires=e)
REQUEST.other.update({dtpref_cols:cols, dtpref_rows:rows})
return self.manage_main(self, REQUEST, __str__=self.quotedHTML(data))
+
security.declarePrivate('quotedHTML')
def quotedHTML(self,
text=None,
@@ -155,6 +157,18 @@
if text.find(re) = 0: text=name.join(text.split(re))
return text
+security.declarePrivate('_clear_cache')
+def _clear_cache(self):
+ Forget results of rendering.
+
+try:
+del self._v_formatted
+except AttributeError:
+pass
+try:
+del self._v_warnings
+except AttributeError:
+pass
# handle uploads too
security.declareProtected('Edit ReStructuredText', 'manage_upload')
@@ -165,7 +179,7 @@
self.source = file
else:
self.source = file.read()
-self.render()
+self._clear_cache()
if REQUEST is not None:
message=Saved changes.
@@ -175,57 +189,60 @@
def render(self):
''' Render the source to HTML
'''
-# format with strings
-pub = docutils.core.Publisher()
-pub.set_reader('standalone', None, 'restructuredtext')
-pub.set_writer('html')
+if self._v_formatted is None:
+# format with strings
+pub = docutils.core.Publisher()
+pub.set_reader('standalone', None, 'restructuredtext')
+pub.set_writer('html')
-# go with the defaults
-pub.get_settings()
+# go with the defaults
+pub.get_settings()
-# this is needed, but doesn't seem to do anything
-pub.settings._destination = ''
+# this is needed, but doesn't seem to do anything
+pub.settings._destination = ''
-# use the stylesheet chosen by the user
-pub.settings.stylesheet = self.stylesheet
+# use the stylesheet chosen by the user
+pub.settings.stylesheet = self.stylesheet
-# set the reporting level to something sane
-pub.settings.report_level = int(self.report_level)
+# set the reporting level to something sane
+pub.settings.report_level = int(self.report_level)
-# Disallow inclusion of files for security reasons
-pub.settings.file_insertion_enabled = 0
+# disallow use of the .. include directive for security reasons
+pub.settings.file_insertion_enabled = 0
-# don't break if we get errors
-pub.settings.halt_level = 6
+# don't break if we get errors
+pub.settings.halt_level = 6
-# remember warnings
-pub.settings.warning_stream = Warnings()
+# remember warnings
+pub.settings.warning_stream = Warnings()
-pub.source = docutils.io.StringInput(
-source=self.source, encoding=self.input_encoding)
+pub.source = docutils.io.StringInput(
+source=self.source, encoding=self.input_encoding)
-# output - not that it's needed
-pub.settings.output_encoding = self.output_encoding
-pub.destination =
[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py Repair copy-paste error.
Log message for revision 39552: Repair copy-paste error. Changed: U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py -=- Modified: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py === --- Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py 2005-10-21 17:46:13 UTC (rev 39551) +++ Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZReST/tests/test_ZReST.py 2005-10-21 17:53:11 UTC (rev 39552) @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ self.assertRaises(AttributeError, lambda: empty.warnings) self.assertEqual(empty._v_formatted, None) -self.assertEqual(empty._v_formatted, None) +self.assertEqual(empty._v_warnings, None) def test_formatted_ignored(self): resty = self._makeOne() ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
[Zope-dev] Re: Mountpoints
Tim Peters wrote: I think it's worse, but mostly because a key with name name is also an option in _related_ sections, but with unrelated meaning. For example, if you had a nested zeoclient section there it could also have specified a name key, which would have nothing to do with the zodb key named name. Nesting options with the same name gets confusing quickly. OTOH, I would like the explicit key better if it had a different name, say zodb multidb-name main filestorage path $DATADIR/Data.fs /filestorage /zodb zodb multidb-name a filestorage path $DATADIR/A.fs /filestorage /zodb Yes, please. There is already confusion for cache-size, let's not repeat that with another key. Note that database-name is more expressive, I think (the multi seems like an implementation detail to me). Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-CMF] Better DeprecationWarnings (was Re: SVN: CMF/trunk/CMFDefault/Portal.py - reverted Portal.py change of r39125 to fix BBB temporarily)
[Tim Peters] Note: sometimes _internals_ use deprecated gimmicks in order to support deprecated gimmicks too, and then stacklevel=3 is too small. It's happened so rarely in ZODB that I haven't tried to do something about that yet. [Chris Withers] Interestingly, I've found that even this is sometimes not enough, since you don't know whether you want the caller, the caller's caller or further up the chain than that. I haven't seen much of that. One place I did is in deprecating subtransactions, where many paths thru the ZODB code have to pass on the original is this a sub or a 'real' transaction? flag. In those cases, the relevant methods also grew an optional `deprecation_wng` argument defaulting to True, and _internal_ calls to such methods explicitly pass deprecation_wng=False. Is there any way to get the warnings stuff to actually emit a traceback so it can be followed? No; the `warnings` module doesn't even import the `traceback` module, let alone use it. You can print a traceback yourself by using the `traceback` module, and if you're determined enough you could replace warnings.showwarning() with a function of your own (see the docs for warnings.showwarning, and possible for traceback.print_stack). ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: Mountpoints
[Tim Peters] I think it's worse, but mostly because a key with name name is also an option in _related_ sections, but with unrelated meaning. For example, if you had a nested zeoclient section there it could also have specified a name key, which would have nothing to do with the zodb key named name. Nesting options with the same name gets confusing quickly. OTOH, I would like the explicit key better if it had a different name, say zodb multidb-name main filestorage path $DATADIR/Data.fs /filestorage /zodb zodb multidb-name a filestorage path $DATADIR/A.fs /filestorage /zodb [Florent Guillaume] Yes, please. There is already confusion for cache-size, let's not repeat that with another key. Note that database-name is more expressive, I think Since the name of the corresponding DB argument is database_name, and all the docs that exist for this call it database_name too, that's hard to argue against ;-) (the multi seems like an implementation detail to me). Not really: a DB's database_name was introduced specifically for the new-in-ZODB-3.5 multidatabase feature, and has no meaning or use apart from its multidatabase role. That's better explained in the ZConfig description section for the key than in the name of the key, though. If Jim doesn't object soon, I'll proceed with adding a database-name key to ZODB's config. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: Mountpoints
Tim Peters wrote: [Tim Peters] I think it's worse, but mostly because a key with name name is also an option in _related_ sections, but with unrelated meaning. For example, if you had a nested zeoclient section there it could also have specified a name key, which would have nothing to do with the zodb key named name. Nesting options with the same name gets confusing quickly. OTOH, I would like the explicit key better if it had a different name, say zodb multidb-name main filestorage path $DATADIR/Data.fs /filestorage /zodb zodb multidb-name a filestorage path $DATADIR/A.fs /filestorage /zodb [Florent Guillaume] Yes, please. There is already confusion for cache-size, let's not repeat that with another key. Note that database-name is more expressive, I think Since the name of the corresponding DB argument is database_name, and all the docs that exist for this call it database_name too, that's hard to argue against ;-) (the multi seems like an implementation detail to me). Not really: a DB's database_name was introduced specifically for the new-in-ZODB-3.5 multidatabase feature, and has no meaning or use apart from its multidatabase role. That's better explained in the ZConfig description section for the key than in the name of the key, though. If Jim doesn't object soon, I'll proceed with adding a database-name key to ZODB's config. +1 -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Mountpoints
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 11:13 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: Not really: a DB's database_name was introduced specifically for the new-in-ZODB-3.5 multidatabase feature, and has no meaning or use apart from its multidatabase role. That's better explained in the ZConfig description section for the key than in the name of the key, though. If Jim doesn't object soon, I'll proceed with adding a database-name key to ZODB's config. Note that I don't have a strong opinion about this either way but I will note that at least Zope 2's subclass of the zodb config handler will need to continue to be willing to use the section title as the database name for backwards compatibility reasons, as people who have older Zopes will want to use their older config files (which have zodb_db sections that have section titles, and no database-name key) with new Zope releases. - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Mountpoints
[Chris McDonough] | Note that I don't have a strong opinion about this either way but I will note that at least Zope 2's subclass of the zodb config handler will need to continue to be willing to use the section title as the database name for backwards compatibility reasons, as people who have older Zopes will want to use their older config files (which have zodb_db sections that have section titles, and no database-name key) with new Zope releases. Note that when you look at Zope2's zopeschema.xml's zodb_db config, there isn't a clue there that the section's name is used for something, let alone what it's used for. This lack of discoverability goes away when using an named key, and that's a better long-term place to be. I don't expect that adding an optional named key to zodb config will _stop_ zodb_db config from doing whatever it wants to do instead. If it does, I agree that would be a problem. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Why is test.py silent by default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The default usecase for running tests should be a developer making changes and running tests. In this case, silent mode is unhelpful; it gives no feedback until the very end of the run, which takes a **long** time for the whole Zope2 tree. The dots provided at verbosity level one are good feedback for the developer: they provide a clue about how many tests have run, and give some chance of deducing that the tests have hung. Unless somebody has a compelling counter-argument, I will check in a patch which makes verbosity level 1 (dots) the default value. People who want quiet mode can always pass '-q'. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDWSAW+gerLs4ltQ4RAs3NAKCodcPqXIDlTJ3QGa4z8gFNc92LcACeJNLc 7ms5+UFjYgv+i/M6/I4eIOc= =wEwp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Why is test.py silent by default
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The default usecase for running tests should be a developer making changes and running tests. In this case, silent mode is unhelpful; it gives no feedback until the very end of the run, which takes a **long** time for the whole Zope2 tree. The dots provided at verbosity level one are good feedback for the developer: they provide a clue about how many tests have run, and give some chance of deducing that the tests have hung. Unless somebody has a compelling counter-argument, I will check in a patch which makes verbosity level 1 (dots) the default value. People who want quiet mode can always pass '-q'. -1 I prefer not to get output unless there is a problem. I'm happy to defer to others, but I personally prefer less output. BTW, within the next week, I will be integrating the new test runner into z2 and z3. So if people agree with you and we decide that the default verbosity level should be 1, then I'll do that when I integrate the new runner. (I guess I'll have to add a quiet option to cancel a default verbosity level.) Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Why is test.py silent by default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The default usecase for running tests should be a developer making changes and running tests. In this case, silent mode is unhelpful; it gives no feedback until the very end of the run, which takes a **long** time for the whole Zope2 tree. The dots provided at verbosity level one are good feedback for the developer: they provide a clue about how many tests have run, and give some chance of deducing that the tests have hung. Unless somebody has a compelling counter-argument, I will check in a patch which makes verbosity level 1 (dots) the default value. People who want quiet mode can always pass '-q'. -1 I prefer not to get output unless there is a problem. I'm happy to defer to others, but I personally prefer less output. Hmm, maybe we need a 'testrunner.rc' file with personal-preference options, then. Assuming that the script looked for it in sensible places (homedir, instance_home/etc, maybe?), I could live without changing the default in the script. BTW, within the next week, I will be integrating the new test runner into z2 and z3. So if people agree with you and we decide that the default verbosity level should be 1, then I'll do that when I integrate the new runner. (I guess I'll have to add a quiet option to cancel a default verbosity level.) Having such an option is usual, for the cases when some other script is driving your testrunner; if '-q' cancels any previous '-v' (explicit or default), then you can shut off unneeded output driven by the upstream script. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDWTmN+gerLs4ltQ4RAjPZAJ9NRehkIN9iMAZqfRvGjwjTeUJwAACfcWEi rgpXVBO4k/sxsWccUmLA62E= =BZX8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [ZWeb] Re: [Zope.org-internal] Re: [Zopeorg-webmaster] Download of Zope 2.8.3 is not possible
Chris Withers wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I made an attempt to document the hardware setup. I announced this a long time ago. If you have the right privileges, you can: svn co svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/zope.org/system-documentation/trunk I don't think it's up to date, but it does reflect at least a partial reality. I wish this would be kept up to date. :/ Yay! I have system docs now. Apologies to Andrew for not knowing these existed *blush* Anyway, I'm going to go and beat some walls down with my head. Hope the changes I've made help even a little... Much thanks Chris! Michael, have you noticed this making any difference? Works atm, the next zope release will show ... Michael -- http://zope.org/Members/d2m http://planetzope.org ___ Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web
[Zope] ZCatalog: searching where on index == another index
Hi all, Is there a way to search for all the records where one indexed field equals another indexed field? Equivalent SQL query would be: SELECT * FROM table WHERE field1 = field2 I know I can get all the unique values for field1 and then do a search for records where field2 = [unique field1 values], but isn't there a better way? Etienne ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] ZCatalog: searching where on index == another index
--On 21. Oktober 2005 13:00:35 +0200 Etienne Labuschagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Is there a way to search for all the records where one indexed field equals another indexed field? no. -aj pgpT5FL2z86QW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] __getitem__ and returning a PageTemplateFile instance
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:43:24PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote: asonhe is not there, but vitester has a __getitem__ method which executes a PageTemplateFile instance and returns it. I.e. Thus, it returns a string. However, ZPublisher requires that all intermediate traversal steps return an object which is not of a simple type and does have a docstring. A string is a simple type, you cannot use it during traversal... Ahh.. that makes sense I guess. It just seems counterintuitive that you can return a string in a normal function, but not in __getitem__. But that way I can't put any values in there. How can I do this then? Can can return a wrapper and give it a docstring. class Wrapper: '''a wrapper around a string.''' # this is the docstring def __init__(self, str): self.str = str def __call__(self): return self.str Some security declarations might be necessary as well. Probably, a class attribute __roles__ = None is sufficient. Okay, that will work. Thanks so much for your help, I really appreciated it. -- Anders -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS/O d--@ s:+ a-- C++ UL+++$ P++ L+++ E- W+ N(+) o K? w O-- M- V PS+ PE@ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G e- h !r y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- PGPKey: http://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD4DEFED0 ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] FTP or WebDav creates empty files
I have a desktop program that develops DTML pages for a ZOPE/PLONE website. I planned to upload them via FTP or WebDav. When they arrive they are empty. I can upload graphics via FTP and the images arrive OK. So basic transfer works. Any ideas on setting or changes needed to make the text files arrive with their content as the body of a DTML document. Thanks David ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] database connections from external method
Vangelis Mihalopoulos wrote: Tino Wildenhain wrote: The threading is handled by the ZDA, so you can use query() or what the method actually is. I couldn't find a method like that... any hints? Have a look at the ZSQL methods code, I remember this being pretty old and convoluted :-( Otoh, what do you think you gain from circumventing ZSQL Methods? Well, i am running zope under root privileges in read-only mode. What does this mean? What are you seeking to do or prevent? If there is a Zope break-in, What does that mean? i want to minimize interference with the database. Which database? Also, since this will be a commercial product, keeping most of the code in compiled python scripts is meaningful. As Jens already explained, .pyc's and pyo's can be decompiled in a matter of minutes, so you're getting nothing for this worry other than finding debugging a pain ;-) cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] database connections from external method
Vangelis Mihalopoulos wrote: I am loading the zodb in read-only mode. If someone breaks into Zope What do you mean by this? (which btw i believe to be very secure) The why do you consider it a risk? i don't want him to be able to directly access (read/write) the database i am using. *AFAIK*, ZSQLMethods won't do for this. Then put constraints in on your database, or make the whole connection read-only. You're really buying nothing with all this other than wasting a lot of your time... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] __getitem__ and returning a PageTemplateFile instance
Anders Bruun Olsen wrote: Ahh.. that makes sense I guess. It just seems counterintuitive that you can return a string in a normal function, but not in __getitem__. I have a feeling you're after traverse_subpath, which is available in both Python Scripts and Page Templates... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [OT] ParsedXML dev mail list
Garito wrote: Sorry for the off topic but I try to subscribe to ParsedXML dev mail list but I can't (mail list doesn't exists) Doesn't look like it. Is ParsedXML an Infrae or a Zope Corp product? You could always try asking about your problem on this list... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Re: implicit vs. explicit ownership?
Jürgen Herrmann wrote: hmm, i'm a bit confused now. do you say that changeOwnershipType() only has to do with executeable ownership? Yep, I think so... especially i have to know which methods of the IOwned interface are essential and have to be reimplemented properly on my objects. Why do you think you need to implement IOwned? ...but the fog is clearing up a little bit now, i thought that the owner role would be completely dynamically assigned to a user by getRolesInContext, now i see that this is done at object creation time and more than one user can have the local role owner on an object. The Owner role is something of a dead chicken. Don't rely on it and ignore it as best you can unless you're really sure what you're doing... for my use cases i'd prefer to let getRolesInContext() add the owner role to it's return list if the (runtime and proprietary) owner check tells it to. any contraindications (besides performance, possibly)? Well, confusion. I'd just get a new role name and use that for whatever you want to do... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] write file to FS (LocalFS?)
Dieter Maurer wrote: Be careful with External Methods and locks: An External Method does not share the module namespace with the same External Methods in other workers. Thus, you should not use locks defined in the source file of the External Method (but outside in a true Python module). Good point! Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Re: inheriting from SimpleUserFolder's User
Florent Guillaume wrote: Actually all third-party userfolders I know of reimplement allowed() in terms of calling getRolesInContext(). SUF doesn't, it aims to keep Simple ;-) I would like to see this fixed in Zope though, I agree the code that's there probably isn't much fo a performance win... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: implicit vs. explicit ownership?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: Jürgen Herrmann wrote: hmm, i'm a bit confused now. do you say that changeOwnershipType() only has to do with executeable ownership? Yep, I think so... especially i have to know which methods of the IOwned interface are essential and have to be reimplemented properly on my objects. Why do you think you need to implement IOwned? Unless Juergen's object is code-like, IOwned is a distraction; ownable objects exist only to prevent trojaning (as Chris correctly pointed out earlier). ...but the fog is clearing up a little bit now, i thought that the owner role would be completely dynamically assigned to a user by getRolesInContext, now i see that this is done at object creation time and more than one user can have the local role owner on an object. The Owner role is something of a dead chicken. Don't rely on it and ignore it as best you can unless you're really sure what you're doing... I don't know why you would say that. The Owner local role (as opposed to executable ownership) is widely used to allow creators of content to edit it in places where they would otherwise be unable to do so. for my use cases i'd prefer to let getRolesInContext() add the owner role to it's return list if the (runtime and proprietary) owner check tells it to. any contraindications (besides performance, possibly)? It *is* possible to hijack the role computation here; getting it right is tricky, however, and when it is wrong, your error messages are going to be inscrutable. The right place to do this might be in a custom user folder, rather than in content. PAS, for instance, has the concept of making the role computation for the *user* pluggable. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDWQ/D+gerLs4ltQ4RAqGEAKC90sJHo7JjtfSGowvBpLbGxpvt4wCdGCm5 Yp0mtxCE1M2hL6SIgYRF7wo= =l8J6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Question: What Workflow tool to choose?
I've been tasked with rapidly developing a demo for a proposed workflow application using Zope. I have plenty of CMF experience including customized workflows based on DCWorkflow, but I'm wondering what other workflows are actively supported and of production quality. In the past I've read blurbs about OpenFlow, ReFlow, and a Google search today turned up those and Metaflow and some others. However, many of them are dead-ends. Openflow's site is a 404 Not Found (in Italian) Metaflow: a 2002 article on ZopeMag sounded interesting, but no link to the software and I can't find it. Plus, old posts on this list make it sound problematic. Reflow turned into CMFOpenflow, which was a fork of Openflow? JaWE2Openflow sounded interesting, but the links are 404 Not Found. Is CMF(DC)Workflow my best option? My application would most likely *not* need other CMF tools, I might want it as a straight Zope 2 application. Also, I'm very new to Zope 3, does it include any workflow or have any available? Thanks, Rob ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Question: What Workflow tool to choose?
--On 21. Oktober 2005 12:18:31 -0400 Robert Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been tasked with rapidly developing a demo for a proposed workflow application using Zope. I have plenty of CMF experience including customized workflows based on DCWorkflow, but I'm wondering what other workflows are actively supported and of production quality. In the past I've read blurbs about OpenFlow, ReFlow, and a Google search today turned up those and Metaflow and some others. However, many of them are dead-ends. The only reasonable workflow systems are DCWorkflow and Alphaflow (requires Plone). Everything else is more or less old and unmaintained or at least not very much usable. -aj pgpO0PXUDdugf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [OT] ParsedXML dev mail list
On 10/21/05, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Garito wrote: Sorry for the off topic but I try to subscribe to ParsedXML dev mail list but I can't (mail list doesn't exists) Doesn't look like it. Is ParsedXML an Infrae or a Zope Corp product? You could always try asking about your problem on this list... It was originally a Zope Corp product, and still lives in the zope.org CVS. I don't think anyone here is currently using it for anything, though. There is a zope-xml list that came into existance back when we were developing that, but its been nothing but spambait for the past couple of years. It should probably be retired. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com Society attacks early, when the individual is helpless. --B.F. Skinner ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] ZCatalog: searching where on index == another index
Etienne Labuschagne wrote at 2005-10-21 13:00 +0200: Is there a way to search for all the records where one indexed field equals another indexed field? Equivalent SQL query would be: SELECT * FROM table WHERE field1 = field2 If the index has only a few different values, enumerating them may be feasible. With AdvancedQuery, this could look like: from Products.AdvancedQuery import Or, Eq query = Or(*[Eq(I1,v) Eq(I2,v) for v in I1.unique(Values)]) -- Dieter ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] FTP or WebDav creates empty files
D Washburn wrote at 2005-10-21 10:03 -0400: I have a desktop program that develops DTML pages for a ZOPE/PLONE website. I planned to upload them via FTP or WebDav. When they arrive they are empty. This usually works. Are you sure, your files do not contain bugs? Can you upload the same file via HTTP without problems? The so called safety belt may also cause problems -- the safety belt is there to protect against overwriting a modified document. CMF had a bug that in case of a differing safety belt, the target object was cleared. -- Dieter ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] __getitem__ and returning a PageTemplateFile instance
Anders Bruun Olsen wrote at 2005-10-21 15:06 +0200: ... Ahh.. that makes sense I guess. It just seems counterintuitive that you can return a string in a normal function, but not in __getitem__. Can can return a string from __getitem__ (without problem), *but* you cannot use this string during URL traversal. By the way, it does not matter for URL traversal whether the string (or other simple type object or object without docstring) was returned by __getitem__, getattr or __bobo_traverse__ (these are the possibilities to obtain the subobject during URL traversal) -- the publisher will in all cases reject it. -- Dieter ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Zope crashing a RedHat installation?
Hi, We're running Zope 2.7.3, Plone 1.0.something relatively large Data.fs ( 300MB ) Decent amount of anonymous traffic, But relatively low administrative use (1 - 2 users usually). Could these factors be brining the machine down? I've been getting intermittent 'corrupted data' messages for some time, but only recently been experiencing serious downtime. Is it time to seriously look at cleaning up the ZODB and upgrading? Or is my web host just trying to sell me more hardware? Any help much appreciated, - Aaron Bauman http://www.gaycenter.org ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Zope crashing a RedHat installation?
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 15:50 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: Hi, Hi, We're running Zope 2.7.3, Plone 1.0.something relatively large Data.fs ( 300MB ) But relatively low administrative use (1 - 2 users usually). Could these factors be brining the machine down? What products? just Plone 1.0.x? I've been getting intermittent 'corrupted data' messages for some time, but only recently been experiencing serious downtime. What kind of hosting: dedicated? shared? -- Administration Formation à l'administration de serveurs dédiés: http://www.google.fr/search?q=aspo+infogerance+serveur ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Zope crashing a RedHat installation?
On 21 Oct 2005, at 20:50, Aaron Bauman wrote: Hi, We're running Zope 2.7.3, Plone 1.0.something relatively large Data.fs ( 300MB ) Decent amount of anonymous traffic, But relatively low administrative use (1 - 2 users usually). Could these factors be brining the machine down? I've been getting intermittent 'corrupted data' messages for some time, but only recently been experiencing serious downtime. Is it time to seriously look at cleaning up the ZODB and upgrading? Or is my web host just trying to sell me more hardware? Not sure what you specifically mean by crashing and bringing down, but Zope and/or Python simply aren't known for crashing the operating system. What exactly are the symptoms that you are seeing? jens ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Zope Install Best Practice - Newbie Questions
Folks, First post from a real newbie, I have currently got Zope installed under a test server and would like to ensure that I get things right for our production environment. Being a complete newbie to Zope I would like to be sure I am doing things right and understood the numerous articles I have read, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Currently, I made a user account; " zopeuser ", I installed Zope via this account and I can access the management interface without issues and managed to get a Plone installation working with mod_rewrite mod_proxy via apache (we have a cPanel dedicated server). However,I think I may have made some fundamental administration or poor practice errors. When I compiled Zope, my source is in the same directory as my final instance, is this a security issue or at least poor practice, is there a better way to do this? If, so could someone point me in the right procedural direction to install Zope. I shall be uninstalling the instance I have, so a fresh install will be completed for the production instance. We are planning on running several Plone instances for different domain web-sites, so that each site can be managed separately by each different department. Does anybody know of any issues that we are likely to bump in torunning Zope under a cPanel based server, to date I have manually added Plone accounts in the httpd.conf but will also be adding a few standard cPanel Apache based domains through the control panel as well, in time. Thanks for your thoughts, I am learning still and hopefully learning quickly, so hopefully my very basic questions will reduce over a short period of time grin. Regards, Russ WinterThis e-mail message and accompanying data may contain information that is confidential and subject to privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately and delete all material pertaining to this e-mail. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] fine grained, dynamic permissions based on attribute values
On 10/18/05, Chris Crownhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day,
I am wondering if/how I could control the permissions on an object based
on the value of an attribute.
So, as an example, I have multiple users, and multiple values for the
category field. I would like User A to access the object if the
category ='financial', and User B access the object if the
category='other'.
If, as Mark asked, different users with different access privileges
have different roles, then how about writing a condition (TALES
expression) for the View action of your content type? Something along
the lines of
python: member and (member.has_role('Accountant') and
context.category=='financial') or (member.has_role('Editor') and
context.category=='other')
Don't quote me on the exact expression, though, you should test that.
Rob
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Zope Install Best Practice - Newbie Questions
Russel, we do install our zope/plone instances in a simmilar way you did. in addition to the steps you described we the do the following - make Zope-2.7 and Zope-2.8 a softlink to the respective source directory and then create the instances from the Zope-2.X/bin directory. the mkzope/zeoinstance scripts create startupscripts with hardcoded paths. With ZopeX a softlink you can easily make updates to minor new zope releases for all your instances - in the zopeusers homedirectory we have a Products directory where we have all the products installed. In the instances/Product folders we then link to them. Again we have Plone-1/2/2.1 links pointing to the respective Releases, so we can make minor Plone updates without hassle. robert Russell Winter wrote: Folks, First post from a real newbie, I have currently got Zope installed under a test server and would like to ensure that I get things right for our production environment. Being a complete newbie to Zope I would like to be sure I am doing things right and understood the numerous articles I have read, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Currently, I made a user account; zopeuser , I installed Zope via this account and I can access the management interface without issues and managed to get a Plone installation working with mod_rewrite mod_proxy via apache (we have a cPanel dedicated server). However, I think I may have made some fundamental administration or poor practice errors. When I compiled Zope, my source is in the same directory as my final instance, is this a security issue or at least poor practice, is there a better way to do this? If, so could someone point me in the right procedural direction to install Zope. I shall be uninstalling the instance I have, so a fresh install will be completed for the production instance. We are planning on running several Plone instances for different domain web-sites, so that each site can be managed separately by each different department. Does anybody know of any issues that we are likely to bump in to running Zope under a cPanel based server, to date I have manually added Plone accounts in the httpd.conf but will also be adding a few standard cPanel Apache based domains through the control panel as well, in time. Thanks for your thoughts, I am learning still and hopefully learning quickly, so hopefully my very basic questions will reduce over a short period of time grin. Regards, Russ Winter This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain information that is confidential and subject to privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately and delete all material pertaining to this e-mail. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: use Data.fs from mountpoint B to populate mountpoint A - how?
Please send all Zope related questions to a Zope related mailing list and not to me privately. Usually, I do not answer questions sent to me privately! I added zope@zope.org. Christoph Berendes wrote at 2005-10-21 14:12 -0400: I created a mount point, /default_site and a corresponding directory var/default_site. I build my plone site from scratch into default_site/site001, and all is good. I then create a second mount point /kitchensbyartisan and a corresponding directory var/kitchensbyartisan. I copy var/default_site/Data.fs into var/kitchensbyartisan. Make the new_site mount point in the ZMI, restart a lot etc. However, when I then navigate in the ZMI to kitchensbyartisan, it's empty and doesn't show site001 (or anything) Do I need something fancier than the following in zope.conf, some reference to default_site? zodb_db kitchensbyartisan mount-point /kitchensbyartisan filestorage path $INSTANCE/var/kitchensbyartisan/Data.fs /filestorage /zodb_db When you use this simple mount-point syntax, then the mount path is coded into the generated storage and you cannot mount the storage under a different path. Actually, the mount-point syntax is much more complex than the form you use above. Among others, it supports mount-point mount-path:storage-path mount-path describes how you reach the mount point in the mounting application and storage-path how you find the mounted object from the storage root. An example would be: mount-point /F1/F2/XXX:/S1/XXX Note that the last component in both paths *MUST* be identical (otherwise, Zope's url construction no longer works with URL traversal). Usually, the storage-path will look like /XXX (where XXX is some id (without '/')). If storage-path is not given, it defaults to mount-path (this explains why you do not see anything in your storage). To summarize: * always explicitely give a storage path * use a storage path of the form /id * then you can mount the storage at different places *BUT* you must never mount with a different id (the mount point must have the same id as that of the mounted object). -- Dieter ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope-DB] MySQL
Ciao Dario, I want to use MySQL in my Zope Installation. But I'm not able to install software (I don't really understand what shall I use and what shall I do...) I'm using Zope: 2.8.1 MySQL 4.1 Windows XP You have to install MySQL for Python: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-python Copy the ZMySQLDA Zope Product in your Protucts-folder: http://www.zope.org/Members/adustman/Products/ZMySQLDA Restart zope. Log in as manager in the ZMI and add a Z MySQL Database Connection with the correspondig info of your server. After that you can use the SQL Method to query your MySQL server via the Z MySQL Database Connection. Cheers, Michele -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / phone: +41 44 632 6193 eth zentrum / hg g 14 / raemistrasse 101 - ch-8092 zurich !DSPAM:4358c39817241410093335! ___ Zope-DB mailing list Zope-DB@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db
Re: [Zope-DB] MySQL
When I try to execute MySQL-python.exe-1.2.0.win32-py2.4.exe I receive a message Box saying: ...MSVCR71.dll not found (I receive a message in italian..) Thanks Dario I'm sorry, but I don't live in the Windows world... With a quick google-search I found: .NET Framework SDK Version 1.1: Provides the core msvcrt.lib for msvcr71.dll against which to link your extensions. [...] Maybe you should try to install it also: http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/ Cheers, Michele -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / phone: +41 44 632 6193 eth zentrum / hg g 14 / raemistrasse 101 - ch-8092 zurich ___ Zope-DB mailing list Zope-DB@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db
Re: [Zope-DB] Closing idle DCoracle2 Connections?
Cynthia Kiser wrote: open. FYI just closing the database connection via the ZMI does not release the idle connections Oracle still sees. Yes, that button actually does nothing ;-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-DB mailing list Zope-DB@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db
Re: [Zope-DB] Closing idle DCoracle2 Connections?
Dieter Maurer wrote: Usually, there is not need for a sophisticated connection management. Just do not create unnecessary DA instances. Yes, this is the most common mistake... Bugs should be fixed and not worked around with more complex software (complex connection management). Well, it depends, there can be a need for lots of infrequently used DA's connecting to the same database. Having these be able to share connections can be useful. I know that I wouldn't want the connection being closed from Oracles side as I have read in the mailinglist that DCOracle would still think the connection is open and generate an error. The DA catches OperationalErrors and reopens the connection. It tries to do this transparently (though a bit wrong). Well, it doesn't succeed for Not Connected and several other salient Oracle errors. FWIW, if people can, I'd recommend moving to cxOracle. There's more life there now :-( Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-DB mailing list Zope-DB@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db
