https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
see this as
trolling[1].
-- Vinayak
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
Bangalore
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https
? This is hardly what one expects from
a PSF member.
I did not find anything
derogatory in the code (that I checked).
From, https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py/blob/master/__init__.py
def get_purpose():
Return the purpose
raise AmbiguousMissionError, Mission unclear
I would normally
and shame ?
Is'nt Anand Pillai a PSF member? This is hardly what one expects from
a PSF member.
I did not find anything
derogatory in the code (that I checked).
From, https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py/blob/master/__init__.py
def get_purpose():
Return the purpose
raise
actions until he explains himself. I know that he does care about educating
folks about Python and helping evangelize it.
-- Ram
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha
have responded to this offlist but I see this as trolling[1].
-- Vinayak
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail
it on the PyLadies-BLR mailing list to which he is subscribed to. He
never did. Infact, IIRC, he joined the mailing list on 02Sept**, the
same day he commits to the ladies.py repo on Github.
** (Disclaimer: I'm one of the list admins and I cross-checked this now.)
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
communication tool
and dislike googlegroups even more.
of PyLadies could explain it - just to educate all of us here
and me in particlar.
I hope Anu's email was explanation enough.
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py was specifically written
to bring this point. Happy to see it hit
/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
ref: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html
Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind
your (now deleted) ladies.py repo publicly as I felt
you deserved a chance to explain yourself. However, your chillpill
repo comes across as STFU, annoying enough that I forked it on
github. I'm happy to delete it if you care to go first.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
. Most FOSS/open source projects/initiatives have a .org
(organization) TLD. Pyladies is a .com website. I find it
curious. Maybe the OP of this thread who is an active member
of PyLadies could explain it - just to educate all of us here
and me in particlar.
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0530, Anand B Pillai wrote:
Dear all,
+1. Btw, I founded and manage this list, but I see my actions
deserve some explanation. As Sriram, said I do have a (somewhat
extreme) sense of sarcastic and dry humour. I am also a PSF member
from 2010 and also
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Ramdas S ram...@gmail.com wrote:
Anand is someone who has contributed immensely as a programmer, and as an
evangelist to Python community. His humour may be distasteful, misogynist
or whatever, but that are his personal views, and definitely not as IPSS
but I see this as
trolling[1].
-- Vinayak
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind his style of sarcastic
humor, but for
fear of being called an outcast from the community, we don't have the guts
to come out
in the open.
Being a member / moderator / owner of various e-groups (tech non-tech
Gadre pratham.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
ref: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html
Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Most of us, don't
...@gmail.com wrote:
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
ref:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html
Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Most of us, don't like
Pillai
(member of PSF).
ref:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html
Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind his style of sarcastic
humor, but for
fear of being called an outcast from
Python Users Group - India bangpypers@python.org
Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2013 1:38 PM
Subject: [BangPypers] Fwd: Fw: Fwd: https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Chris, STOP emailing me offlist. I made it very clear earlier that I
didnt want to have any private conversations and have said
...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 6:32 PM
Subject: Fw: [BangPypers] Fwd: https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
To: svak...@gmail.com svak...@gmail.com
Svaksah,
This was intended to be sent to you directly, not to the group list.
My rule is praise in public, criticize in private. But I
/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Chris, was it easier to troll in private than on the public Bangpypers
mailing list? If you're reduced to ad hominem and that too in private
off-list messages, you're pretty clearly out of anything remotely
relevant to say.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
-- Forwarded message
/ladies.py
That is what I thought - you have no answers and are simply interested in
forcing others by your bullying.
I took it off topic, directly to you, because I was honestly interested in your
reply
and didn't want your reply to be compelled to be less than honest.
So my asking you
(that I checked).
I would normally have responded to this offlist but I see this as
trolling[1].
-- Vinayak
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes
/ladies.py
Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind his style of sarcastic
humor, but for
fear of being called an outcast from the community, we don't have the guts
to come out
in the open.
Being a member / moderator / owner of various e-groups (tech non-tech)
in
India,
I know
support PyLadies, a big ThankYou.
Anand, another request, can you delete the chillpill repo on
github? I had not forked your (now deleted) ladies.py repo publicly
as I felt you deserved a chance to explain yourself. However, your
chillpill repo comes across as STFU, annoying enough that I
forked
bangpypers@python.org
Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2013 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: [BangPypers] Appropriate list conduct (was Re: Fwd: Fw:Fwd:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py)
Thanks Dhananjay,
Finally someone is asking something sensible among all the mud throwing that's
going on.
I
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Annapoornima Koppad a.kop...@gmail.comwrote:
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every women
mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray all Bangalore
men in bad light. Which is not my intention. More over, I am in touch
Hi,
On Sunday 08 September 2013 01:26 AM, svaksha wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
On second thoughts maybe this was the objectionable part
def get_purpose():
Return the purpose
raise AmbiguousMissionError, Mission unclear
Also the
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Also svaksha's mail did not mention what she
found objectionable.
Vinayak, did you miss this email?
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/009359.html
My replies are as inline text as I dislike
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpillai at letterboxes.org wrote:
in anyway, but in general I don't personally agree with
woman coding as a separate problem as opposed to people
coding.
I hope you raised these objections on the PSF mailing list too.
-svaksha
As a PSF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 September 2013 08:23 AM, svaksha wrote:
The next time you see anything related to PyLadies or women in
Foss, feel free to air your sexist view that women's groups is an
issue more of politics than technology and society on the PSF
Pratham Gadre pratham.ga...@gmail.com writes:
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
I think this is getting out of hand. There were mistakes made
intentional or otherwise and this caused a lot of ill will.
I'm not particularly fond
I think this is getting out of hand. There were mistakes made
intentional or otherwise and this caused a lot of ill will.
I'm not particularly fond of witch hunts. I don't think they're very
effective and the damage done to the larger organisation when one of
these things happen is often
: CsquaredinOmaha c2inom...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [BangPypers] https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
To: svak...@gmail.com svak...@gmail.com
svaksha,
Let me see if I can summarize your string of responses:
You are offended by Anand making fun of a group that used .com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 September 2013 12:28 AM, CsquaredinOmaha wrote:
My apology is retracted. I am sorry to have asked questions you
can't answer.
And I am truly sorry you are so unpleasant in how you deal with
anything that isn't exactly to your
Subject: Fw: [BangPypers] Fwd: https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
To: svak...@gmail.com svak...@gmail.com
Svaksah,
This was intended to be sent to you directly, not to the group list.
My rule is praise in public, criticize in private. But I made a
mistake in replying using this yahoo
you do something to stop this? Thanks.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
-- Forwarded message --
From: CsquaredinOmaha c2inom...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 6:32 PM
Subject: Fw: [BangPypers] Fwd:
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
To: svak...@gmail.com svak...@gmail.com
and since the matter is settled, I am not sure
what you are trying to do by sending these follow-ups.
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py was specifically
written to bring this point. Happy to see it hit the target.
Anand, now you just come across as self-entitled and arrogant
python
code?
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py was specifically
written to bring this point. Happy to see it hit the target.
Anand, now you just come across as self-entitled and arrogant. The
if apology not withstanding.
2. Mission - It would be nice to educate us all in this list
about
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:08 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Also svaksha's mail did not mention what she
found objectionable.
Vinayak, did you miss this email?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Saturday 07 September 2013 10:26 PM, Annapoornima Koppad wrote:
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every
women mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray
all Bangalore men in bad light. Which is not
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
On Saturday 07 September 2013 10:26 PM, Annapoornima Koppad wrote:
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every
women mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray
all Bangalore
All,
Even though I am not particularly fond of Anand's deeds or comments, he has
done a lot of work for the Python movement in his previous years. Which I
believe should have added more sense of responsibility in his actions,
given his experience. Which apparently has not happened.
I suggest
women to code. One of my
first ideas was to write Pyhton/Django code for the blog, make it a
hacknight or a platform to gather women and start coding on it. Any reasons
other than that, none!
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py was specifically written
to bring this point. Happy to see it hit
@Anand,
I read this email after I typed the other response and sent it.
Apologies accepted. Yes, it did offend me. Now since you are asking sorry,
I will let it go.
Thanks and regards,
Annapoornima
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org
wrote:
it - just to educate all of us here
and me in particlar.
I hope Anu's email was explanation enough.
Yes it was to an extent and since the matter is settled, I am not sure
what you are trying to do by sending these follow-ups.
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py was specifically
and since the matter is settled, I am not sure
what you are trying to do by sending these follow-ups.
My isnt_that_odd function of ladies.py was specifically
written to bring this point. Happy to see it hit the target.
Anand, now you just come across as self-entitled and arrogant
bother to reply.
Since Vid has gone ahead and paraphrased on my behalf, though only part of
the mails I'd sent to her:
Here's what I wrote to Svaksha when I first saw the I love ladies.py on
the github page. I hadn't thought about checking the init files:
= begin quote ===
I don't know what
Am reading all the responses, including Anand's apology, so I'll reply
to those later. One at a time.
And since you responded to my email, here goes:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. I was talking about the initial mail which lacked context.
There
51 matches
Mail list logo
