On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Pratham Gadre pratham.ga...@gmail.comwrote:
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
ref:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html
Mails with the subject :
Hi..
Its was in bad taste and treated as such, proper apology demanded and given..
hence we hope all the concerned party rest this.. or take it up in private.
..a full apology from Anand is on the maillist, posted at 9:50AM 8 Sep 2013.
rgds
Srikanth
On 08-Sep-2013, at 11:15 AM, Pratham
+1 to Svaksha Pratham for speaking out.
Anand Pillai, your conduct is unbecoming of a python community member,
leave alone a member of PSF and IPSS.
IMHO, there should be no place on PSF for people like you.
In your first response, you come off as super arrogant haughty, as if
having started
+1
Regards,
Abdul Muneer
--
Follow me on Twitter: @abdulmuneer http://twitter.com/#%21/abdulmuneer
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, T S KAMATH tsk.kam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi..
Its was in bad taste and treated as such, proper apology demanded and
given.. hence we hope all the concerned
Ouch, there was mail that came just before i hit send. I +1-ed what Mr.
Kamath said.
Its was in bad taste and treated as such, proper apology demanded and
given.. hence we hope all the concerned party rest this.. or take it up in
private.
It might be a politically incorrect thing for person
Pratham Gadre pratham.ga...@gmail.com writes:
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
I think this is getting out of hand. There were mistakes made
intentional or otherwise and this caused a lot of ill will.
I'm not particularly fond
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 September 2013 08:23 AM, svaksha wrote:
The next time you see anything related to PyLadies or women in
Foss, feel free to air your sexist view
All,
Even though I am not particularly fond of Anand's deeds or comments, he has
done a lot of work for the Python movement in his previous years. Which I
believe should have added more sense of responsibility in his actions,
given his experience. Which apparently has not happened.
I suggest
I think this is getting out of hand. There were mistakes made
intentional or otherwise and this caused a lot of ill will.
I'm not particularly fond of witch hunts. I don't think they're very
effective and the damage done to the larger organisation when one of
these things happen is often
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 September 2013 12:46 PM, svaksha wrote:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 September 2013 08:23 AM, svaksha wrote:
The
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Ramdas S ram...@gmail.com wrote:
Anand is someone who has contributed immensely as a programmer, and as an
evangelist to Python community. His humour may be distasteful, misogynist
or whatever, but that are his personal views, and definitely not as IPSS
https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py, comes off as trying too
hard to be cute. #EpicFail.
svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Hi Svaksha,
This can be fixed by sending a mail to the author and in this case,
forking, modifying and asking for a pull request.
Why is there a necessity to name and shame ? I did not find anything
derogatory in the code (that I checked).
I would normally have responded to this offlist but I
All,
Seriously, I thought people were busy not having time after the conference.
I would love to see who wants to add more commits to this particular
repository.
Come on guys, I thought you had better jobs to do than try (very) hard to
make fun of others.
If there are such jobless people, I
On second thoughts maybe this was the objectionable part
def get_purpose():
Return the purpose
raise AmbiguousMissionError, Mission unclear
Also the URL http://ladiespy.com does not resolve.
Also there are python programmers(gender-neutral term) on this list.
Maybe if there are
any
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every women
mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray all Bangalore
men in bad light. Which is not my intention. More over, I am in touch with
the PSF board itself, I had a good mind to send your repository link to the
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Svaksha,
This can be fixed by sending a mail to the author and in this case,
forking, modifying and asking for a pull request.
Why is there a necessity to name and shame ?
Is'nt Anand Pillai a PSF member? This is
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Annapoornima Koppad a.kop...@gmail.comwrote:
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every women
mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray all Bangalore
men in bad light. Which is not my intention. More over, I am in touch
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
On second thoughts maybe this was the objectionable part
def get_purpose():
Return the purpose
raise AmbiguousMissionError, Mission unclear
Also the URL http://ladiespy.com does not resolve.
Ah, maybe you
Hi,
On Sunday 08 September 2013 01:26 AM, svaksha wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
On second thoughts maybe this was the objectionable part
def get_purpose():
Return the purpose
raise AmbiguousMissionError, Mission unclear
Also the
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Also svaksha's mail did not mention what she
found objectionable.
Vinayak, did you miss this email?
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/009359.html
My replies are as inline text as I dislike
Hi,
On Sunday 08 September 2013 01:07 AM, svaksha wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Svaksha,
This can be fixed by sending a mail to the author and in this case,
forking, modifying and asking for a pull request.
Why is there a necessity to name
I've sent a few emails to Svaksha - first asking what exactly was not
right, and then followed up stating that I didn't see the source code
itself.
I don't know what Anand had in mind writing such code. Knowing him and his
strong sense of sarcastic humor, I'd like to reserve judgement on his
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:08 PM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Also svaksha's mail did not mention what she
found objectionable.
Vinayak, did you miss this email?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
On Saturday 07 September 2013 11:20 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
I've sent a few emails to Svaksha - first asking what exactly was
not right, and then followed up stating that I didn't see the
source code itself.
I don't know what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Saturday 07 September 2013 10:26 PM, Annapoornima Koppad wrote:
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every
women mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray
all Bangalore men in bad light. Which is not
Hi Anand,
Please find my answers inline.
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
On Saturday 07 September 2013 11:20 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
I've sent a few emails to Svaksha - first
@Anand,
I read this email after I typed the other response and sent it.
Apologies accepted. Yes, it did offend me. Now since you are asking sorry,
I will let it go.
Thanks and regards,
Annapoornima
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0530, Anand B Pillai wrote:
Dear all,
+1. Btw, I founded and manage this list, but I see my actions
deserve some explanation. As Sriram, said I do have a (somewhat
extreme) sense of sarcastic and dry humour. I am also a PSF member
from 2010 and also
Am reading all the responses, including Anand's apology, so I'll reply
to those later. One at a time.
And since you responded to my email, here goes:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. I was talking about the initial mail which lacked context.
There
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
+1. Btw, I founded and manage this list, but I see my actions
deserve some explanation. As Sriram, said I do have a (somewhat
extreme) sense of sarcastic and dry humour. I am also a PSF member
from 2010 and also
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
On Saturday 07 September 2013 10:26 PM, Annapoornima Koppad wrote:
More, I had a good mind to email this particular detail to every
women mailing list that I am aware of. But then, it would portray
all Bangalore
Hello Annapoornima,
I can understand your stance, but I think, this email is bit strongly
worded and could hurt the readers.
And as a helpful note, I think, leadership on your effort could be built
more in friendly cooperative way than by intimidation.
Personally, I care more about python,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sunday 08 September 2013 01:44 AM, svaksha wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
+1. Btw, I founded and manage this list, but I see my actions
deserve some explanation. As Sriram, said I
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpillai at letterboxes.org wrote:
in anyway, but in general I don't personally agree with
woman coding as a separate problem as opposed to people
coding.
I hope you raised these objections on the PSF mailing list too.
-svaksha
As a PSF
As a PSF member I'm going to delurk right now. That's because as an
admirer/supporter of the India Python community, I'm rather shocked and
saddened by this thread.
The PSF and pyladies have been affiliated for quite some time, arguably
years at this point. In fact, the PSF has provided
Hi Annapoornima
I am ready to work please share job details in Python development
Regards
Srinivasa
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Annapoornima Koppad a.kop...@gmail.comwrote:
All,
Seriously, I thought people were busy not having time after the conference.
I would love to see who wants
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sunday 08 September 2013 01:44 AM, svaksha wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Anand B Pillai
anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
+1. Btw, I founded and
Hello All,
I was naive in accepting Anand Pillai's clever play of words as an apology.
More and more, I get to see the other side of play of words.
@Anand Pillai, Can you issue a proper apology clearly stating that you will
refrain from making comments hurting other people's initiatives, now or
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:27 AM, svaksha svak...@gmail.com wrote:
Am reading all the responses, including Anand's apology, so I'll reply
to those later. One at a time.
And since you responded to my email, here goes:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 September 2013 08:23 AM, svaksha wrote:
The next time you see anything related to PyLadies or women in
Foss, feel free to air your sexist view that women's groups is an
issue more of politics than technology and society on the PSF
Audrey,
We would like to hear your thoughts on the antics pulled by Anand Pillai
(member of PSF).
ref: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2013-September/thread.html
Mails with the subject : https://github.com/pythonhacker/ladies.py
Most of us, don't like the way he is hiding behind
42 matches
Mail list logo
