Nathan Coulson wrote:
Just wanted to note that I had to add --without-pam to build without
the optional dependency pam.
Thanks Nathan. I'll have this added to the default configure command
and an explanation put in the book tomorrow.
-- DJ
--
that link in a long time,
and haven't seen any problems with it.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I've been away quite a bit lately, do we have an expected release date
for 6.3 yet? Pretty much, as long as package freeze isn't in the next 3
weeks or so, I should be able to get to the couple of bugs I just opened.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ
, that's up to the more
active editors.
I hope that helps.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
David Olsson wrote:
This got lost, I think. So here it is again.
On my BLFS 6.2 system, the SysVinit script
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop
does not kill dhcpcd. Tracing it to the script
/etc/sysconfig/network-devices/services/dhcpcd
DJ Lucas wrote:
David Olsson wrote:
This got lost, I think. So here it is again.
On my BLFS 6.2 system, the SysVinit script
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop
does not kill dhcpcd. Tracing it to the script
/etc/sysconfig/network-devices/services/dhcpcd
it turns out
the check for the infinate lease after a bug report was submitted, but I
can't remember how long ago, or how many versions ago that was...Hell,
I'm not even positive that I made the change, but I do remember the
conversations about it.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
introduction to the book. I must have dropped the ball on that one, but
FWIW, I've never seen anything that needed /usr/bin/X11.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
there was.
The build used to die on can't find Xlib.h IIRC. Do you have /usr/X11
or /opt/X11 and _no_ /usr/X11R6 symlink? If so, then I suppose it's not
needed now.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Sábado, 11 de Agosto de 2007 20:11, DJ Lucas escribió:
Execute the following command to create the compatibility symlink:
ln -s $XORG_PREFIX /usr/X11R6
=
Except if XORG_PREFIX == /usr , I think
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Sábado, 11 de Agosto de 2007 20:11, DJ Lucas escribió:
Execute the following command to create the compatibility symlink:
ln -s $XORG_PREFIX /usr/X11R6
=
Except if XORG_PREFIX == /usr , I think
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 8/11/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Sábado, 11 de Agosto de 2007 20:11, DJ Lucas escribió:
Execute the following command to create the compatibility symlink:
ln -s $XORG_PREFIX /usr/X11R6
.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
they
choose to. The experienced reader will know that it's bad when we he
or she sees 'compatibility' or 'stopgap' and take on the task if they
choose, as will our developers if/when they have the time to do so.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
Randy McMurchy wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 07/25/07 14:43 CST:
Guys, I'm getting an error in dbus-python installation.
I'm not seeing it. Compiles fine for me. Here's my stack:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build find Sources -name *py*
Sources/GNOME2/gnome-python-desktop-2.18.0
name simply brings more errors...
dbus.exceptions.py is next.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
Subversion, PDL, FreeTTS, Junit, Pilot-link, Graphviz, libidn,
Apache-ant, java-access-bridge, KDE Base, KDE Bindings, Cyrus-sasl,
cups, OpenSSH, Berkly DB, and OpenOffice.
If anyone would like to lend their experience, remaining are PDL
modules, Pilot-link, KDE Base, KDE
DJ Lucas wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
3. The GCC patch should probably be at a -2 revision level, indicating
a difference in your original.
It'll probably have to be rediffed anyway, I think they got the '
/dev/null' added in the compiler check when we get the new sources
the wiki
from the wget and md5 lists. The toughest part is remembering to do it
when the file lists change. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I don't have the
kids at home.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/blfs-book-xsl/index.html
or the book diff is also in my homedir. OOo-2.2.1 is there too.
Oops...I should mention this is not an official release, hence the
ea-b02 (early access). The official u2 is b05 which hasn't been
uploaded
of commands. I'll look into them
tomorrow if somebody else doesn't get to them first.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
in the (near?)
future as it specifically mentions the transition between X11R5 and
X11R6 as justification for /usr/X11R6. It also might be nice if we
could find some discussion about that instead of relying on speculation,
I just don't know where to look yet.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Miércoles, 27 de Junio de 2007 09:01, DJ Lucas escribió:
Also,
anyone know if the pdf book is a go with the new FOP? Guess I could
build and find out, or save if for tomorrow.
With FOP-0.93 you must to use the stylesheets used in the new-xsl branch:
svn
libraries courtesy of RedHat
AS 2.1. Wonder what version of X is installed in AS now with the latest
and greatest service release? Hopefully that should shed some light on
the why.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs
put up a test copy in my home dir tomorrow in case
anybody is bored and would like to assist with the testing. Also,
anyone know if the pdf book is a go with the new FOP? Guess I could
build and find out, or save if for tomorrow.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs
at building a replacement libmawt?
-- DJ Lucas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] X11]# xdpyinfo
name of display::0.0
version number:11.0
vendor string:The X.Org Foundation
vendor release number:7020
X.Org version: 7.2.0
maximum request size: 16777212 bytes
motion buffer size: 256
bitmap unit, bit
DJ Lucas wrote:
we need to use '--mandir=$XORG_PREFIX/share/man'
Whoops...n/m. We have already. I was looking at my $XORG_CONFIG from
the host system of about a year ago.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe
DJ Lucas wrote:
Guys, the line added to layout/build/Makefile.in in the Firefox
instructions should be:
EXTRA_DSO_LDOPTS += $(MOZ_XLIB_LDFLAGS) -lX11 -lXrender
Whoops. That should have been $(XLDFLAGS) as Dan pointed out later in
the thread. I use /opt/X11.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http
and later make some symlinks like /usr/bin/X11
- /usr/X11R6/bin. I don't know the history behind those decisions.
The history for those symlinks is in the FHS linked above.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs
]: *** [default] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/firefox-build'
make: *** [build] Error 2
I expect it would be the same with Thunderbird, but don't know about
Seamonkey.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
. I'll pass my patch set on to you soon as I find it
again...gimme a few moments.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/29/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the optional libxml2 with fontconfig, excluding the use of
expat. MesaLib choked on me as a result.
Ah, yes. I forgot about that one. In Mesa-6.5.2, expat is used in the
intel dri drivers. I'll fix that up
DJ Lucas wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/29/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the optional libxml2 with fontconfig, excluding the use of
expat. MesaLib choked on me as a result.
Ah, yes. I forgot about that one. In Mesa-6.5.2, expat is used
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/30/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I found in the xorg-server instructions
'/full/path/toMesa-6.5.2'. And thank you very much for getting rid of
that nasty sed! There is nothing wrong with the instructions as they
are, but I skipped right over
DJ Lucas wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/29/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used the optional libxml2 with fontconfig, excluding the use of
expat. MesaLib choked on me as a result.
Ah, yes. I forgot about
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/30/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And another...just a reminder for me unless you get to it first, this
test needs to be fixed upstream and in the book:
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
test -z /opt/X11/share/X11/xkb/compiled || mkdir -p
in the next
couple of weeks and start contributing a little again. I'll also confirm
your JDK results WRT XCB as soon as I get there.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I used the optional libxml2 with fontconfig, excluding the use of
expat. MesaLib choked on me as a result.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
in a windowed environment, I think FOP but
not sure. No time to check right now, but will get back soon.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
for the build, does anyone have a problem with 1.
using the Debian source tarball, and 2. calling the package ksh only
since that is all that would be installed (or needed beyond build
time)? That is unless anybody knows of an autotooled version of ksh
that doesn't require ast-lib.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
prefer the original ATT ksh noting the read limitation in
pdksh. I rarely use that syntax, prefering backtics or $(..), but I
could see it causing problems for some. I'll give it a go anyway. JDK
build is only 12 SBU now!
Thanks for the links.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
and then OOo are next on my list. I'll probably stick with
OOo-2.0.3 so JDK gets done as soon as possible, and then move on to
OOo-2.1.x afterwards.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
libs)
libXdmcp (moved from libs)
new package xcb-proto-1.0 (http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/)
new package libxcb-1.0 (http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/ (dep libxslt,
optional doxygen))
xorg-7.2 libs (minus xtrans,libXau, and libXdmcp change to updated versions)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Well since update-pciids is a script, we could just modify that to
unpack the pci.ids file.
Another mark for the KISS method. :-) I like this best.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
} \
$XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/{rstart,xdm,xinit,xserver,xsm} \
$XORG_PREFIX/share/X11/{app-defaults,xkb}
Is this same issue Ken reported in the 7.2 thread? This problem does or
does not affect 7.1?
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
I can't see anything wrong, but I'm still having problems sending to
LFS-Dev...checking the other lists I'm sub'd to as well. I know Bruce
did something the other day to try to fix it and then I changed some
things on my end as well that should have
, if you (or any admin) get time, please review and see if
you see anything funny as to why I can't post there now. I am not
getting the not subscribed message as I was before.
Subscribed address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
test
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
and Pyrex. Dropped back to 0.9.4.1 with no change. I think
I remember seeing some people working with dbus/hal recently when I was
digging through my disaster of backlogged emails. Need to figure out
what has changed since then.
-- DJ Lucas
--
This message has been scanned for viruses
Dan, this one is wanting xinputproto-1.4, currently at 1.3.2. I'm not
entirely sure what has changed, so I've backed off to xsetpointer-1.0.0
locally to avoid rebuilding the deps. I'll dig through the buildlog and
rebuild the dependent packages when I complete the scripted build.
-- DJ Lucas
this, that'll work.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
that is needed is
the restore.
For #2186, I think I'll leave it open until Ken comments on it. I'm
pretty sure #2125 will fix it, but I want to make sure.
Agreed.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
'zlib-dynamic' is needed. Also, I believe we are
missing a few optional deps (krb5 flavor, gmp, and camellia are output
by config), but haven't verified more than just that output.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs
with either package (OOo and JDK).
Need more than just the two TTF in /usr/share/font as these don't
include symbols. Try browsing maths page in wiki for instance.
For the moment, regards,
Allard.
Thanks for the feedback.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs
how long
and didn't take time to find it on his site). It might mean an
additional note/link in BLFS and a change of luit's location, but should
not be viewed as a bad thing (consequence usually implies 'bad' to me).
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
it in
the book in a matter of minutes so that others won't have trouble with
it in the future.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Simon Scheiwiller wrote:
Yes, that would be clear ;-)
Simon
Cool. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
required for XFree86 now I believe. FYI, other than
this problem, so far it looks to be pretty strait update using the
current patches, or at least so far as none of the changes affect the
patched code and it's building now.
Thanks in advance.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
continue this on blfs-support I'm sure. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
name for dvds. :-/
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
!-- Allow anyone in halusers group (gid 61) to utilize HAL --
policy group=61
allow
send_interface=org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.SystemPowerManagement/
allow send_interface=org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.LaptopPanel/
allow send_interface
and install kdelibs next (and step my way up if
needs be). I'll need it and base anyway for k3b. Looking at it now, I
have a pretty good idea that this will turn out to be an arts error.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
DJ Lucas wrote:
'ps -a | grep dhcpcd'
Whoopse 'ps -e | grep dhcpcd'
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- 1997 Yoichi Hariguchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copyright (C) January, 1998 Sergei Viznyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
now. Coincidently, the .kde directory is created, just
not the temp dir or 'link' as was in the error output.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
, and 1st NS. This requires PRINTIP=yes.
PRINTALL=yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kdebase-3.5.2]#
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Also, I wonder what else might be broken without (again assuming that is
the problem). I didn't have the time to install kde parts yet, but am
starting on them now. Coincidently, the .kde directory is created, just
not the temp dir or 'link
hope that is a little better description. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
doesn't build then
tell them to build on a sane host :-)
That's why it was removed a second time. I figured enough time had
passed. This note cannot carry into the release. If it goes back in,
it should be removed once LFS goes to rc.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Apps, which need Libs, which
need pkg-config. Actually, I'm not sure it even needs the server
(except, obviously, to be able to start the program).
Fixed.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
right in.
Similar to what I had in mind...
'libglut (not needed if Xorg7 includes the optional MesaGLUT library).'
Your addition is better. It's more descriptive for a potentially
confusing situation.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
not prepared to let either one go just yet. Xorg-7.1 is
a new release, and will not be the same as the previously planned 6.9.x
maintenance release. I don't know anything about the timeframe for the
maintenance releases...anyone heard anything on them yet?
-- DJ Lucas
--
http
files). The 7.1 release
folders only contain the updated packages just to make things more
difficult, but thanks for the script...it can be adapted to account for
the other packages from the previous release.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
is
needed for Mesa to show the availibility of freeglut, just let me know
and I'll get it in the 7.1 update. Hope that helps clarify it a bit.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information
Randy McMurchy wrote:
The text in the book that says the code base is the same needs
to be changed, unless BLFS is content on fibbing. :-)
Okay...I'll remove it tomorrow or the next day. ;-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
in the thread by nowit needs an
explanation.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 05/22/06 20:36 CST:
If you think a note is
needed for Mesa to show the availibility of freeglut, just let me know
and I'll get it in the 7.1 update. Hope that helps clarify it a bit.
Actually, it doesn't clarify it a bit for me, as Xorg
DJ Lucas wrote:
Anyway, this works since we
have to modify it, and is consistant with libpng-config's result, but
would the patch be the better option?
Forgot to add:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /media/lfs/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.10
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6
Archaic wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:25:03AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
Looks like the devices are handled in 25-lfs.rules now...including
ownership by the audio group. Shouldn't that become simply:
That is a left over that will be removed after 6.2.
After 6.2? It can be corrected
-alsa.rules EOF
# ALSA Devices
# When a sound device is detected, restore the volume settings
KERNEL==controlC[0-9]*, ACTION==add, RUN+=/usr/sbin/alsactl restore %n
EOF
chmod 644 /etc/udev/rules.d/15-alsa.rules
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 5/21/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong place. Dep info for individual packages is to be covered in the
wiki. BLFS assumes all packages are installed.
In addition to the fonts section, the lib section also mentions the
which libs need to be installed
newer autoconf/automake.
DJ, OK to commit the change s/autoreconf/autoreconf -ifv/ ?
Yes. Please do.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/20/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Please do.
One more thing. The http link is broken right now. Everything has
been removed from here:
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R7.0/src/extras/
How about using the actual site at dri.freedesktop.org
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/20/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And some better:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-May/015476.html
Have you seen a tarball list yet?
No, but take the RC2 list, and substitute the announcements from the
threaded view of 2006-May above
DJ Lucas wrote:
Should we return to the
'badged' tarballs? This _will_ eliminate any confusion as to which
versions to use, but I worry that if a single component needs updating,
it won't be covered by the wget scripts.
Now I know this is bad. There may be several small fixes to several
stripping
the so off, or maybe just fix the test in configure manually.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 5/19/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
./configure: line 19219: test: too many arguments
It needs to be regenerated...unfortuantely, the tarball was created with
older autotools as you suspected. Now to figure out why it's stripping
the so off, or maybe just fix
an eye out.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
work fine. Also, if reversing the process, make sure that console and
null remain.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
make it
easier for editors that might have to deal with them in the book. I
also think being linear, as Bruce had mentioned previously, will be
easier for users. I'm undecided, so let me know what's best.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
locally. It'll be commited tomorrow if nobody chalenges. If anyone
disagrees, speak up now.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Archaic wrote:
Finally, build the three remaining packages with the standard build
commands:
s/three/four/
Thanks. Fixed locally. Will be in soon.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
to it than being
difficult...they take forever. I don't have the time I'd like to have
to put toward LFS/BLFS anymore. This always varies from week to week,
and I've had more than usual lately, but the long build times allow me
to step away for a bit and still contribute. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote:
I'm not sure if we can obtain those values from the toplevel makefile,
but we can certainly make configure scripts use a new moz_flavour and
test for all of the above in one shot as is done in the toplevel
config_office/configure. In these tests, the standalone tests must
://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedmilestone=6.2owner=blfs-book%40linuxfromscratch.orgorder=priority
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
DJ Lucas wrote:
The instructions are
correct in the context of release7 which uses '/usr' as the default
prefix, but are really confusing when taking into account /usr/X11R6. I
honestly didn't expect anyone to build against release 6, and the
instructions weren't targeted
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Has anyone tested against XFree86? I haven't. Xorg-6.9.0 is fine
with the new Mesa
No it isn't. The problem is that parts of Mesa that come with Xorg-6.9.0
are still compiled statically into
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so
Just a reminder for those forging ahead with Xorg7. If you need these
utils before they go into the book, they are located at...
http://ttf2pt1.sourceforge.net/
and
http://polyglotman.sourceforge.net/
I'll fix tickets tomorrow...off to bed.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
are compatible with XFree86 bins. If you
already have tested, please feel free to change what I've just commented
out in the mesalib instructions.
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
601 - 700 of 922 matches
Mail list logo
