Patrick,
I think I posted this before but no one is picking up on it so here
it is again. Can you try to adjust your JDBC string with a
few extra things and see if that works?
jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/YOUR_DB?logger=
Can you please use the string?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
Folks,
For whatever reason, here's my situation: I need to run a ColdFusion
4.5 application on Windows 2003 (Web Edition). CF45 doesn't recognize
that version if IIS (no surprise) and so I install with the Other
option and then manually followed the directions in this Tech Note
(http
On 8/30/06, John Paul Ashenfelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
For whatever reason, here's my situation: I need to run a ColdFusion
4.5 application on Windows 2003 (Web Edition). CF45 doesn't recognize
that version if IIS (no surprise) and so I install with the Other
option
]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 2:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: HELP: ColdFusion 4.5 on Windows 2003 (Web edition) don't ask
Folks,
For whatever reason, here's my situation: I need to run a ColdFusion
4.5 application on Windows 2003 (Web Edition). CF45 doesn't recognize
that version
Hah ... our financial group has their own dedicated Windows 2003 server to
host their site. They are using CF 4 of all things, works like a champ
though wish it did not so they were forced to upgrade. :)
On 8/30/06, John Paul Ashenfelter
Works like a champ now. You know, at least as far
Bump bump, anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install
From the logs:
Additional Notes: ERROR - standalone.xmljava.io.FileNotFoundException:
C:\CFusionMX7
.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Windows 2003 Server Install
Did CF actually install? Or did it bomb out during the install?
On 25/08/06, Crow T Robot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take one
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=228c3aaa
Mad the boot.ini change and it worked.
Sweet :)
-Original Message-
From: loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install
It installed
First time ever doing this hosted and remote.
I know there is some OS security setting in Windows 2003 that was causing my
CFMX 7 installs to fail, anyone know what I'm talking about?
I've been googling it and can't find what I mean
First time ever doing this hosted and remote.
I know there is some OS security setting in Windows 2003 that
was causing my CFMX 7 installs to fail, anyone know what I'm
talking about?
I've been googling it and can't find what I mean.
It's probably Data Execution Prevention, and I
Additional Notes: ERROR - JNDI port 2920 for
server coldfusion is not active
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install
Huh, because I did download the full one
Hope someone can help me with this...
I have a ton load of files directory (images etc etc) on a unix machine. My cf
app runs on a windows machine on the network. I need to provide ability to the
app user to be able to upload files etc to the folder on the unix machine. Also
I have to display
we've done in a distributed scenario is use windows DFS with FRS to
keep the files locally, but synchronize them with other pcs. It works
pretty well. If you have enough disk space to store the files locally, you
can do period syncs with the *nix server using rsync.
The best solution of course
Unfortunately, that is not an option. Many legacy applications are tied with
teh files folder being on unix(or linux? don't know). So we have to go for a
multi platform scenario.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly
pak-Nash wrote:
Hi folks,
I am new to coldfusion; I have successfully setup Mx coldfusion 7, IIS
5.1. Now my client has requirement to incorporate windows NT
authentication to his site. What i did for this is just edit the site
settings in IIS and i choose the Integrated windows
how to read user name and password from a prompt box that
display incase of Integrated windows authentication?
If you're using integrated Windows authentication, you can configure Windows
to record failed login attempts, and view those from the Security event log.
Within your CF application
That should be an OS level logging integration issue. Look into Windows
authentication and logging schemes.
These look hopeful:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/maintain/monito
r/logevnts.mspx
http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/24376/24376.html
One of my customers wanys to run CF5 on windows 2003.
Anyone know what exactly is meant by the statement on the Adsobe website:
ColdFusion Application Management components are not supported on this
platform.
Kevin Roche
Technical Director
Objective Internet Ltd
It definately works. At my last job we had CF5 running on Win2K3,
although to be fair I never set it up.
On 10/08/06, Kevin Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my customers wanys to run CF5 on windows 2003.
Anyone know what exactly is meant by the statement on the Adsobe website
our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Roche
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Aug 10 13:21:32 2006
Subject: CF5 on windows 2003
One of my customers wanys to run CF5 on windows 2003.
Anyone know what exactly is meant by the statement on the Adsobe website:
ColdFusion
We have a client that is having a problem w/named windows. While logged on
to the application, explicitly named windows will keep spawning off new
windows.
The problem is acting like Internet Explorer 6 is operating in self
contained execution path--where windows A doesn't see named windows from
I have randomly run into this problem before where new windows spawn instead
of using existing windows, or even a new window spawns for each link for
form submit.
The problem does just go away by itself after IE is closed down or after a
reboot.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Dan G
I have randomly run into this problem before where new windows spawn
instead
of using existing windows, or even a new window spawns for each link for
form submit.
The problem does just go away by itself after IE is closed down or after a
reboot.
The problem is at one client's location (and only
There is a setting for Explorer to open in a new window, so I would assume
that you can do the same for IE.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Dan G. Switzer, II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 July 2006 14:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer Problem - Named windows
As it has been a popular topic lately, I decided to finaly blog it.
http://russ.michaels.me.uk/index.cfm/2006/7/8/Creating-new-secure-instances-
with-ColdFusion-MX7-multi-server
-
Snake
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority
Thanks, Snake...I'll have a look!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 11:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX7 Multiserver on windows
As it has been a popular topic lately, I decided to finaly blog it.
http://russ.michaels.me.uk
Hi,
I have a windows map drive to another server. I can read the files with cffile
fine, but when I use cfcollection to index the file, it doesn't do it. When I
cfdump the status, it says File not found.
So cffile action=read file=\\abc\file\content.doc variable=content/
works fine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a windows map drive to another server. I can read the files with
cffile fine, but when I use cfcollection to index the file, it doesn't do it.
When I cfdump the status, it says File not found.
So cffile action=read file=\\abc\file\content.doc variable
I have a windows map drive to another server. I can read the
files with cffile fine, but when I use cfcollection to index
the file, it doesn't do it. When I cfdump the status, it
says File not found.
So cffile action=read file=\\abc\file\content.doc
variable=content/ works fine
recommend a long time Windows person throw it all away for Linux,
and not then spend a fair amount of time un-learning.
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership
Not going to get into a debate about this with you. But, if
you think that running VMWare in production is a bad idea,
then you certainly haven't been in very many enterprise level
operations.
Amen to that. VMware is all about production.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
I just did a little reading about Windows 2003 Web Server
Edition and it's curious that MS says you can't use SQL
Server or even the SQL Server Express Edition with it. The
describe the Web Server Edition as being built for developing
web applications...how do they expect a web
But I think Win Web Server might be a reasonably inexpensive
alternative to Win 2003 Server...I just haven't used it at all.
Anybody else using Win Web Server?
Yes, it's perfectly fine with single instances of CF that don't use large
amounts of memory.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
Another question...any idea what the actual number of
simultaneous connections is limited to running Win XP Pro?
With Windows 2000 Professional, it was ten. So, I'd guess that XP is the
same. It is not suitable for a production web server.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http
Thanks for the insights, Dave.
I guess Windows 2003 Standard Edition would be appropriate, then.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
I just
Windows uses ports
1024 to 5000 for ephemeral connections with a timeout of 4 minutes before they
can be reused. If your server is busy, it can cycle through those connections
at a higher rate and you will get all sorts of socket errors. Typically I both
set the timeout lower and raise the limit
Denny Valliant wrote:
All of the suggestions are aimed more at folks who's servers change
quite a bit more regularly than yours, but are good practice none the less,
even if one server is all you have to worry about, for the next 10 years.
No, they are aimed at people that want to throw a
But $0 expenses does not equate to $0 cost.
Don't quite follow your reasoning here...I'm only talking monetary cost...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 4:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Don't need a Windows Server OS
So, I've decided to use Apache instead of IIS as a web server.
Does this mean that my web server can now serve multiple
sites from Win XP Pro, instead of having to have a server OS,
such as Win 2000 Server, Win 2003 Server, or Win Web Server?
I'm talking about a production server.not a
a good
firewall at least?
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 11:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
So, I've decided to use Apache instead of IIS as a web server.
Does this mean
Rick Faircloth wrote:
So, I've decided to use Apache instead of IIS as a web server.
Does this mean that my web server can now serve multiple
sites from Win XP Pro, instead of having to have a server OS,
such as Win 2000 Server, Win 2003 Server, or Win Web Server?
Yes.
I'm talking about
a development server.
I wouldn't recommend this. As Jochem mentioned, there are limitations on how
many open connections a non-server Windows OS may accept. If you already
have a Windows 2000 Server, why not just use that?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf
You can hack the registry and get around that... But why would ya ever want
to?
LOL :)
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 12:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Rick
Well...in that case, I guess it's either Win 2000 Server, Win Web Server
Edition,
or Linux.
Have you (or anyone else) had any experience with Win Web Server Edition?
Do any of the Windows servers have a free developer edition? (Yeah, I
know...
Linux is free (as in beer, but not as in pain ;o
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Rick,
Great news on going apache. Why not just throw out that M$ OS entirely and
go Linux? If I am understanding you, you're wanting to run xp pro in
production? Really bad idea
Another question...any idea what the actual number of simultaneous
connections is limited to running
Win XP Pro?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using
-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Oh, man, Phil...I'm trying to get my blood pressure and stress level DOWN
and you want me to go Linux at the same time I'm installing Apache, CF7, et
al, at the same time! I'd go into tech overload and have a stroke!
I've
just haven't used it at all.
Anybody else using Win Web Server?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
So, I've decided to use Apache instead of IIS
Probably wouldn't...I want a suitable OS for a web server.
Just didn't know if Win XP would fit the bill.
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Rick,
I said that with tongue in cheek. I do certainly prefer **ix over doze. In
all actuality, I prefer OpenBSD over all for a myriad of reasons.
For people that are new **ix environments, Fedora or SUSE is great because
you can install
a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Rick,
Great news on going apache. Why not just throw out that M$ OS entirely and
go Linux? If I am understanding you, you're wanting to run xp pro in
production? Really bad idea if so. XP Pro is not geared for production use
and I can't imagine the security issues
: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
So, I've decided to use Apache instead of IIS as a web server.
Does this mean that my web server can now serve multiple sites from
Win XP Pro, instead of having to have a server OS
Thanks for the recommendation on Fedora. Someone mentioned that
to run CF I'd have to have a Linux license...got a ballpark cost for that?
-Original Message-
From: David Crean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Don't need a Windows
Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
You can download a 180 trail version of 2003 Enterprise server. So, every
180 days you take 4 hours and re-install your os and programs and you have
That is to say.. You have to have a version of CF for Linux.
-Phil
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Well...if I've got to have a Linux
Oh...gotcha...
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
That is to say.. You have to have a version of CF for Linux.
-Phil
-Original Message
but I could still use Win 2000 Server
It's always nice to have to regress back 6 years to get a system of theirs that
works right, while windows 2000 was probably their best one aren't they
stopping updates to it now? Which brings up the point of if you do go with a
windows server you
Rick Faircloth wrote:
I had just opened up another branch of inquiry for future
reference concerning what the production OS would need
to be...now I know it can't be XP Probut I could still use
Win 2000 Server, or Linux (yikes!) without spending anything.
Are you seriously considering
No...I'm going to setup Apache, CF7, DW8, and MySQL 5
on my laptop for development.
Once I'm ready for production with that environment, I'll move
to either Windows 2003 Standard or 2003 Web Edition Server.
Both can be had for about $250 - $350, so I'll just use them.
-Original Message
I think for now I'll just setup Apache, CF7, DW8, MySQL 5
on my laptop and test there.
When I've completing testing, I'll set up a new server with
Windows 2003 Standard or Windows 2003 Web Server as a
production server.
I just did a little reading about Windows 2003 Web Server Edition
and it's
on. It's
just like .net, sure its free, IF you run it on a windows server (which you
gotta spend bucks on) and of course then you will probably run sql server
(which you gotta spend big bucks on), how does free look now?
outta curiosity lets say Rick sets up a few different boxes from scratch
Off the top of my head, I would calculate the costs as follows
(where I can give a reasonable estimate):
A) Windows Solution
- Windows Box: $1000 (with RAID / hardware only including monitor)
- Windows Server 2003 Web Edition: $300
- CF Standard: $1300
- IIS
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Off the top of my head, I would calculate the costs as follows
(where I can give a reasonable estimate):
A) Windows Solution
- Windows Box: $1000 (with RAID / hardware only including monitor)
- Windows Server 2003 Web Edition: $300
You want to run CF
I think you did over estimate on your time, to set up linux, apache, mysql and
cfm (basic time frame) should only be 2 hours or so. Its the testing, loading,
ect of the machines that takes time. And most of that time frame is loading
linux on same as it would be to load windows on. And you
the bills. If I don't have to spend any money
on network AV or a firewall...well, that calculates out to $0...
Why so much more then Windows? What is so hard about typing:
apt-get upgrade
apt-get install apache
apt-get install mysql
apt-get update
This is a perfect example of why it would take
helped me in other areas (windows ssh stuff, os x in general), but the issue
is
one we all face. My folly is I seem to like the learning more than the
doing...
If I have a main folly, besides time... they're kinda related, I guess...
;-)
And all the stuff you mentioned at the end of your email...don't
snip
Well it's things like this that they get ya on. It's just like .net, sure
its free, IF you run it on a windows server
/snip
..NET runs on **ix. It is called Mono they painstakingly reproduces .NET on
windows (even reproduce .NET bugs / quirky behavior so applications don't
have
yeah but you really couldnt run a production server on that, would be like
running a production server on vmware, sure it could be done but you
certainly wouldnt want to, that would be like running an osx server on a
windows machine with pearpc.
the cheapest .net solution just might
Windows Server 2003 Web Edition What's This?
It's a new server meant just for serving web sites...none of the
other small business-type stuff...
Just what I need...
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 7:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE
Thanks for the insights, Denny...
-Original Message-
From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 8:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
On 6/17/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
enterprise level operations.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 8:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
yeah but you really couldnt run a production server on that, would be like
running
last I heard mono was still in beta and not a very good product and that maybe
the case with vmware and maybe I am thinking of something different, I am
talking about like when u run ms virtual machine on a mac to run windows, where
it runs but quirky and nowhere near full speed which is what
Dave,
Obviously, asking any M$ oriented guy about a viable alternative to .NET is
going to generate a negative response. The reality of mono it has grown up.
Google is getting on board with mono..
Check out some facts here:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-mono/
Some of the
matter to as I wont be going anywhere near it.
~Dave - formerly known as the disruptor~
From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 11:16 PM
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache
@houseoffusion.com
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
Dave,
Obviously, asking any M$ oriented guy about a viable alternative to .NET is
going to generate a negative response. The reality of mono it has grown up.
Google is getting on board with mono..
Check out some facts
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Don't need a Windows Server OS if using Apache?
They were using it as responses to it could run anywhere and they were
supporting it not going against it, they just said it didnt run
Guys, I'm looking at getting a new PC since there's a ton of deals going
on but most seem to be coming with Windows Media Center instead of WinXP
Pro.
Can CFMX run on Windows Media Center? Any limiations?
Rey...
~|
Message
, 2006 9:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Can CF run on Windows Media Center
Guys, I'm looking at getting a new PC since there's a ton of deals going on
but most seem to be coming with Windows Media Center instead of WinXP Pro.
Can CFMX run on Windows Media Center? Any limiations?
Rey
PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, I'm looking at getting a new PC since there's a ton of deals going
on but most seem to be coming with Windows Media Center instead of WinXP
Pro.
Can CFMX run on Windows Media Center? Any limiations?
Rey
I run it just fine. I'm not hosting mind you, but it runs fine. I use
Apache for the web server. I even had CFMX6 and CFMX7 running for a
while, along with BlueDragon.
Just to be clear though - I'm not hosting a production site. Just
using it for my development.
Sure Ray, we all know
hahahahahaha!
Munson, Jacob wrote:
I run it just fine. I'm not hosting mind you, but it runs fine. I use
Apache for the web server. I even had CFMX6 and CFMX7 running for a
while, along with BlueDragon.
Just to be clear though - I'm not hosting a production site. Just
using it for my
/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=47
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Can CF run on Windows Media Center
Guys, I'm looking at getting a new PC since there's a ton of deals going
Gene6 ftp server, it is prob the best ftp server currently available, and
has over taken serv-u ftp.
snake
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 May 2006 21:11
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Secure FTP Server on Windows?
We've been using Filezilla Server
to
the Windows account database.
rick
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239750
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
, simple, secure FTP server that supports FTP
over SSH. I'd PREFER that the user account database NOT be linked to
the Windows account database.
rick
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239705
Archives
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:11 PM
I'm looking for a cheap, simple, secure FTP server that supports FTP
over SSH. I'd PREFER that the user account database NOT be linked to
the Windows account database.
CoreFTP Server
I have successfully got http://www.openssh.net/ working on windows,
but its a pain to install administer mostly because the
documentation is scarse.
On 5/6/06, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been using Filezilla Server for internal and non-secure FTP but we
now have a need for secure
Subject: CFMX 7.01 and Windows XP sp 2 issue
Hi,
It's been one of those days.
Anyway, here is the scoop:
New development machine with XP Professional sp 2. Installed CFMX 7, updater
and hot fix 1 (cannot put 2 because it's not recommended for Flex 2
development)
Everything works fine, then trying
why I'm stumped. I don't know where to look. This is the setup:
Machine A:
Windows XP Sp2 CFMX 7.01 updater 1
Application works fine in Firefox but doesn't hold session in IE
Using IE to connect to other Machines on the network (that have similar
setup except XP is still with sp1 (or Windows 2003 sp1
AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7.01 and Windows XP sp 2 issue
Ben,
I agree with your statement but:
1. The same application works fine on this system using Firefox and the same
version (of the application) works fine on other machines using both IE and
Firefox 2. Connecting to another machine
Yes, I can connect to other sites using IE (including to this application
but on other servers) but not local. Local I can only access using FF and
just tried with Netscape and it's working fine.
So the bottom line is cannot hold session with IE 6 or 7 from any machine
On 5/3/06, Ben Nadel
Victor, that would tell me that the most likely place to go looking is
the Application.cfm/cfc.
Since your browser isnt the likely culprit, it has to be something on
your server or in your app.
The web server doesnt have much to do with it, and nor does the
coldfusion server. I'd challenge each
.
...
Ben Nadel
www.bennadel.com
-Original Message-
From: Victor Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7.01 and Windows XP sp 2 issue
Yes, I can connect to other sites using IE (including to this application
.
...
Ben Nadel
www.bennadel.com
-Original Message-
From: Victor Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7.01 and Windows XP sp 2 issue
Yes, I can connect to other sites using IE (including
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7.01 and Windows XP sp 2 issue
cfapplication name=#variables.myApp#
sessionmanagement=yes
clientManagement=no
sessiontimeout=#variables.sessionTimeOut#
applicationtimeout=#CreateTimeSpan(4, 0, 0, 0
Nope, no difference. I think it's a combination of WinXp sp 2 and IE but
can't figure out what. Any IE that connects to this machine is losing the
session
There are a lot of good, knowledgeable people on this list and if nobody has
encountered the problem I'm afraid that I have one of those hard
Well **I** had that problem, Victor, and I went to some effort to show
you how you can troubleshoot it, but you seem to have just dismissed
it as useless information..
Its up to you. I cant do any more than tell you what i did to find
the problem and solve it.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW,
Hi Mike,
Sorry, I responded in one email to both you and Ben. I have read your email
and we are not using Application.cfc (yet), so I don't think your example
will help my case.
Also, the application works fine on any other machine (that doesn't have Win
XP sp 2) and it works fine with Win XP sp
A stupid thing. You can find the detailed info here:
If you are using IE 5.5 or IE 6.0, and your local server name has an
underscore or other non-alphanumeric character (other than a dash) in the
name, then cookies will not work correctly. One workaround is to access the
machine by IP address;
901 - 1000 of 2371 matches
Mail list logo
